You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Pharmaceutics
  • Correction
  • Open Access

20 December 2022

Correction: Gandhi et al. Ultrasound-Mediated Blood–Brain Barrier Disruption for Drug Delivery: A Systematic Review of Protocols, Efficacy, and Safety Outcomes from Preclinical and Clinical Studies. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 833

,
,
,
and
1
Department of Anatomy, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand
2
Brain Health Research Centre, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand
3
School of Pharmacy, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Error in Table
In the original publication [1], there was a mistake in Table 3 as published. The mistakes pertained to the manufacturer information listed in the rows corresponding to the Optison® and SonoVue®/Lumason® microbubbles. We acknowledge that some manufacturer information was outdated, and no longer currently accurate, e.g., the mean bubble diameters and concentrations. In addition, some information was accidentally misclassified between the two microbubbles, e.g., the gas core and shell composition. The corrected Table 3 appears below. The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.
Original:
Table 3. Comparison of five major commercially available microbubble formulations used in studies for ultrasound-mediated BBB disruption (information sourced from manufacturer) and typical doses.
Table 3. Comparison of five major commercially available microbubble formulations used in studies for ultrasound-mediated BBB disruption (information sourced from manufacturer) and typical doses.
AgentManufacturerShell CompositionGas Core CompositionMean Bubble Diameter (µm)Bubble Concentration (Bubbles/mL)Use in Identified Studies
Definity®/Luminity®Lantheus Medical ImagingLipidC3F81.1–3.31.2 × 1010Used in n = 42 preclinical studies (typical doses: 10–20 µL/kg) and n = 6 clinical studies
(typical dose: 4 µL/kg)
Optison®GE HealthcareLipidSF62.0–4.55–8 × 108Used in n = 14 preclinical studies (typical doses: 50–100 µL/kg but significantly varied in mouse studies)
SonoVue®/Lumason®Bracco Diagnostics Lipid-proteinC3F82.51–5 × 108Used in n = 29 preclinical studies (typical doses 25–150 µL/kg) and n = 2 clinical studies
(typical dose: 100 µL/kg)
Usphere Prime®Trust
Bio-sonics
LipidC3F81.02.8 × 1010Used in n = 1 preclinical study
Sonazoid®GE HealthcareLipidC4F102.0–3.09 × 108Used in n = 1 preclinical study
Corrected:
Table 3. Comparison of five major commercially available microbubble formulations used in studies for ultrasound-mediated BBB disruption (information sourced from manufacturer) and typical doses.
Table 3. Comparison of five major commercially available microbubble formulations used in studies for ultrasound-mediated BBB disruption (information sourced from manufacturer) and typical doses.
AgentManufacturerShell CompositionGas Core CompositionMean Bubble Diameter (µm)Bubble Concentration (Bubbles/mL)Use in Identified Studies
Definity®/Luminity®Lantheus Medical ImagingLipidC3F81.1–3.31.2 × 1010Used in n = 42 preclinical studies (typical doses: 10–20 µL/kg) and n = 6 clinical studies
(typical dose: 4 µL/kg)
Optison®GE HealthcareProteinC3F83.0–4.55–8 × 108Used in n = 14 preclinical studies (typical doses: 50–100 µL/kg but significantly varied in mice studies)
SonoVue®/Lumason®Bracco DiagnosticsLipidSF61.5–2.51.5–5.6 × 108Used in n = 29 preclinical studies (typical doses 25–150 µL/kg) and n = 2 clinical studies
(typical dose: 100 µL/kg)
Usphere Prime®Trust
Bio-sonics
LipidC3F81.02.8 × 1010Used in n = 1 preclinical study
Sonazoid®GE HealthcareLipidC4F102.0–3.09 × 108Used in n = 1 preclinical study

Reference

  1. Gandhi, K.; Barzegar-Fallah, A.; Banstola, A.; Rizwan, S.B.; Reynolds, J.N.J. Ultrasound-Mediated Blood–Brain Barrier Disruption for Drug Delivery: A Systematic Review of Protocols, Efficacy, and Safety Outcomes from Preclinical and Clinical Studies. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.