Next Article in Journal
Remote Sensing Detection of Forest Changes in the South Ridge Corridor and an Attribution Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
What Is the Relationship Between Forest Footprint and Export of Forest Products? Evidence from Method of Moments Quantile Regression
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Xu et al. Effects of Different Landscape Greening Pest Control Modes on Carbon Storage and Soil Physicochemical Properties. Forests 2024, 15, 2235

Research Institute of Forestry Policy and Information, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Forests 2025, 16(2), 204; https://doi.org/10.3390/f16020204
Submission received: 11 January 2025 / Accepted: 16 January 2025 / Published: 23 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Forest Health)

Error in Figure

In the original publication [1], there was a mistake in Figure 5. The pH values in Figure 5d were inadvertently generated using TP data from Figure 5c. All other components of Figure 5 and the manuscript’s analyses remain accurate. The corrected Figure 5 appears below. The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.

Reference

  1. Xu, L.; Wang, C.; He, Y.; He, Y. Effects of Different Landscape Greening Pest Control Modes on Carbon Storage and Soil Physicochemical Properties. Forests 2024, 15, 2235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 5. Effects of different LGPCMs on soil chemical properties. TN—total nitrogen; OC—organic carbon; TP—total phosphorus; pH—soil pH; Pb—lead; Cd—cadmium; Hg—mercury. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among LGPCMs (p < 0.05). The same applies below.
Figure 5. Effects of different LGPCMs on soil chemical properties. TN—total nitrogen; OC—organic carbon; TP—total phosphorus; pH—soil pH; Pb—lead; Cd—cadmium; Hg—mercury. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among LGPCMs (p < 0.05). The same applies below.
Forests 16 00204 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, L.; Wang, C.; He, Y.; He, Y. Correction: Xu et al. Effects of Different Landscape Greening Pest Control Modes on Carbon Storage and Soil Physicochemical Properties. Forests 2024, 15, 2235. Forests 2025, 16, 204. https://doi.org/10.3390/f16020204

AMA Style

Xu L, Wang C, He Y, He Y. Correction: Xu et al. Effects of Different Landscape Greening Pest Control Modes on Carbon Storage and Soil Physicochemical Properties. Forests 2024, 15, 2235. Forests. 2025; 16(2):204. https://doi.org/10.3390/f16020204

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xu, Laixian, Chao Wang, Youjun He, and Yating He. 2025. "Correction: Xu et al. Effects of Different Landscape Greening Pest Control Modes on Carbon Storage and Soil Physicochemical Properties. Forests 2024, 15, 2235" Forests 16, no. 2: 204. https://doi.org/10.3390/f16020204

APA Style

Xu, L., Wang, C., He, Y., & He, Y. (2025). Correction: Xu et al. Effects of Different Landscape Greening Pest Control Modes on Carbon Storage and Soil Physicochemical Properties. Forests 2024, 15, 2235. Forests, 16(2), 204. https://doi.org/10.3390/f16020204

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop