Correction: Kelley et al. Use of Multi-Temporal LiDAR to Quantify Fertilization Effects on Stand Volume and Biomass in Late-Rotation Coastal Douglas-Fir Forests. Forests 2021, 12, 517

The authors wish to make the following corrections to their paper [1]. We realized that one of our earlier analyses had used a date range off by one year. These values have been adjusted to match the years described in the text and other analyses. Thus, in the corrected version after publication:

• On page 9, the value “(242 SE 8)” correctly reads “(243 SE 8)”.
• On page 9, the value “(269 SE 10)” correctly reads “(270 SE 10)”
• On page 9, the value “(p = 0.035)” correctly reads “(p = 0.023)”
• On page 9, the value “(p = 0.122)” correctly reads “(p = 0.173)”
• On page 9, the value “(p = 0.002)” correctly reads “(p = 0.0002)”
• On page 9, the value “(308 SE 9)” correctly reads “(326 SE 6)”
• On page 9, the value “(266 SE 10)” correctly reads “(271 SE 11)”
• On page 9 the values “16%” correctly reads “20%”
• On page 14—Table 5—Pre-Treat column Row 2, the value “−7%” correctly reads “−4%”
• On page 14—Table 5—Post-Treat column Row 2, the value “−2%” correctly reads “0.4%”
• On page 14—Table 5—Post-Treat column Row 7, the value “16%” correctly reads “20%”

Additionally, we noticed that in Table 5 the formula in the caption was missing a “−1” term and thus the corrected version now reads (((Fertilized/Control)−1) × 100). The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused to the readers by these changes and maintain that the scientific conclusions have been unaffected.