Next Article in Journal
Concertation of Anti-Reflective, Superhydrophobic Surface Based on Rational Assembly of Dual-Size Silica
Previous Article in Journal
Gas Turbine Blade Failures Repaired Using Laser Metal Additive Remanufacturing
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

The Influence of Model Orientation on the Surface Roughness of Polymeric Models Produced by FFF, mSLA, PJ, and SLS Methods

1
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics, Rzeszów University of Technology, 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland
2
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Opole University of Technology, Mikołajczyka 5 Str., 45-001 Opole, Poland
3
Faculty of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Narbutta 85 Str., 02-524 Warsaw, Poland
4
Faculty of Automotive and Construction Machinery Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Narbutta 84 Str., 02-524 Warsaw, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2025, 18(24), 5600; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18245600
Submission received: 25 October 2025 / Revised: 5 December 2025 / Accepted: 8 December 2025 / Published: 12 December 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 3D & 4D Printing—Metrological Problems)

Abstract

The research methodology involved creating a 3D sample model that featured both flat and cylindrical surfaces inclined at angles ranging from 0° to 90° relative to the XY plane. The study investigated the surface topography of additively manufactured samples produced using various technologies, including Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF), masked Stereolithography (mSLA), PolyJet (PJ), and Selective Laser Sintering (SLS). The focus was on how material type, print angle, and measurement location influenced the results. The materials used in the study included PLA, PETG, acrylic resins, PA2200, and VeroClear. Due to the optical properties of the materials used, measurements were carried out on replicas that were prepared using a RepliSet F5 silicone compound from Struers. Consequently, a methodology was developed for measuring surface roughness using the Alicona microscope based on these replicas. A 10× objective lens was used during the measurements, and the pixel size was 0.88 µm × 0.88 µm. Each time, an area of approximately 1 mm × 4 mm was measured. The lowest roughness values were observed for mSLA samples (Sa = 6.72–8.54 µm, Spk + Sk + Svk = 33.36–42.16 µm), whereas SLS exhibited the highest roughness (Sa = 27.86 µm, Spk + Sk + Svk = 183.79 µm). PJ samples exhibited intermediate roughness with significant anisotropy (Sa = 11.65 µm, Spk + Sk + Svk = 72.1 µm), which was strongly influenced by the print angle. FFF surfaces showed directional patterns and layer-dependent roughness, with the Sa parameter being the same (12.44 µm) for both PETG and PLA materials. The steepest slopes were observed for SLS surfaces (Sdq = 7.67), while mSLA exhibited the flattest microstructure (Sdq = 0.48–0.89). Statistical analysis confirmed that material type significantly influenced topography in mSLA, while print angle strongly affected PJ and FFF (although for FFF, further studies would be beneficial). The results of the research conducted can be used to develop a methodology for optimizing the printing process to achieve the required geometric surface structure.
Keywords: additive manufacturing; orientation; surface roughness; optical measurements; polymer; vat polymerization; powder bed fusion; material extrusion; material jetting additive manufacturing; orientation; surface roughness; optical measurements; polymer; vat polymerization; powder bed fusion; material extrusion; material jetting

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bazan, A.; Turek, P.; Budzik, G.; Niesłony, P.; Grygoruk, R.; Siemiński, P. The Influence of Model Orientation on the Surface Roughness of Polymeric Models Produced by FFF, mSLA, PJ, and SLS Methods. Materials 2025, 18, 5600. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18245600

AMA Style

Bazan A, Turek P, Budzik G, Niesłony P, Grygoruk R, Siemiński P. The Influence of Model Orientation on the Surface Roughness of Polymeric Models Produced by FFF, mSLA, PJ, and SLS Methods. Materials. 2025; 18(24):5600. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18245600

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bazan, Anna, Paweł Turek, Grzegorz Budzik, Piotr Niesłony, Roman Grygoruk, and Przemysław Siemiński. 2025. "The Influence of Model Orientation on the Surface Roughness of Polymeric Models Produced by FFF, mSLA, PJ, and SLS Methods" Materials 18, no. 24: 5600. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18245600

APA Style

Bazan, A., Turek, P., Budzik, G., Niesłony, P., Grygoruk, R., & Siemiński, P. (2025). The Influence of Model Orientation on the Surface Roughness of Polymeric Models Produced by FFF, mSLA, PJ, and SLS Methods. Materials, 18(24), 5600. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18245600

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop