Next Article in Journal
Optimization of Planting Concrete Thickness and Grass Species for Roadbed Side Slopes
Previous Article in Journal
The Effect of Different Particle Sizes of Fly Ash on the Properties of Mortar
Previous Article in Special Issue
Impact of Plasma Surface Treatment on Implant Stability and Early Osseointegration: A Retrospective Cohort Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ti-Al-V/Zn-Al-Cu Composite Materials Prepared by Zinc Melt Infiltration Technology

1
Department of Metals and Corrosion Engineering, University of Chemistry and Technology, Prague, Technická 5, 166 28 Prague, Czech Republic
2
Department of Metallurgical Technologies, Faculty of Materials Science and Technology, VŠB-Technical University of Ostrava, 17. Listopadu 2172/15, Poruba, 708 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2025, 18(20), 4690; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18204690 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 4 September 2025 / Revised: 6 October 2025 / Accepted: 11 October 2025 / Published: 13 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Implant Materials and Biocompatibility)

Abstract

This work deals with the preparation and characterization of TiAlV/ZnAlCu composite materials. The aim is to create a model for biomaterial with good biocompatibility and acceptable mechanical properties. Infiltrating zinc into the reinforcement made of the titanium alloy could significantly improve the osseointegration of the bioimplant made from this material. The investigated reinforcements of three different geometries made from Ti-6Al-4V prepared by the SLM method (selective laser melting) were infiltrated with molten zinc or the Zn-based alloy. Two infiltration approaches were used—suction of the melt using a vacuum pump and centrifugal casting. By these procedures, different infiltration rates were achieved. Furthermore, the mechanical properties of the prepared composite materials were characterized by compression tests. The results were compared with the mechanical properties of the Ti-6Al-4V alloy reinforcement.

1. Introduction

Titanium and its alloys are widely used to make implants [1]. They are distinguished by their corrosion resistance, low density and biocompatibility [2]. The only disadvantage is that their strength is too high, which can cause a stress-shielding effect [3]. This can be reduced by using a special porous design, which offers another area of research—a biogenic element can be infiltrated into the pores, which could further improve biocompatibility and the ability to osseointegrate [4]. The organism would gradually absorb the biogenic element and instead build new tissue that would fit well on the implant [5,6]. Zinc is a suitable biogenic element for several reasons—it is involved in a number of metabolic pathways of various enzymes that are essential for the human body, and its antimicrobial effects are also important [7,8,9]. The alloy system that forms different phases of zinc with titanium is quite complex and it is still under investigation [10]. Its full exploration is crucial for the preparation of new biocompatible alloys. Understanding the kinetics of the formation of the intermetallic phases is also essential for designing a suitable production process. Indeed, it has been shown that with prolonged contact between titanium and zinc, the two metals react together to form an undesirable layer of brittle intermetallics, the formation of which must be prevented [11].
A method that could provide a sufficiently high melt cooling rate could be the centrifugal casting method. In addition, unlike conventional casting methods, it provides higher quality and more accurate castings [12]. Nowadays, the trend in metallurgy is towards additive methods of producing metallic materials. Additive methods are exclusive especially in their ability to create geometrically complex structures that would be difficult to create by other methods [13,14]. With these methods, each patient could receive special care, and it would not be a problem to produce a tailor-made implant for them in a short time [15].
The disadvantages of additive methods are the defects created during printing. The most common are gas pores or keyhole pores, as well as areas of insufficient fusion and balling phenomenon on the surface of the material [16,17]. These defects have to be taken into account in the development process of the material.
The recently studied Ti/(Mg-)Zn composites are usually prepared by friction stir processing [18,19] of gravity casting [20]. We have chosen the process of infiltration of the Zn (-based) melt into Ti-6Al-4V 3D-printed scaffold serving as reinforcement. The conditions used for additive manufacturing of Ti-6Al-4V by selective laser malting (SLM) technology were described in [21]. The Ti-6Al-4V alloy was taken as a most typical 3D-printed Ti-based alloy. For the same reason, the Zn-4Al-3Cu alloy was chosen as infiltrating matrix. The optimal conditions for processing of both materials are known, and the aim of this article lays in a description of infiltration success and boundary interaction. The centrifugal casting process offers the feasibility of infiltration not only into open scaffolds but also into those closed by bulk material on one side. This may be the case for Ti-based implants with a bulk centre and porous surface. For comparison, vacuum suction was performed. This process enables infiltration only of open scaffolds. In this case, the pure Zn was chosen for infiltration to prove the negligible effect of minor elements (Al, Cu) on the matrix–reinforcement join.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Preparation

Scaffolds used in this experiment were made from Ti-6Al-4V alloy. The condition of their preparation by the SLM method is given in [21]. Three different structure types of scaffolds were used for the experiments, as seen in Figure 1. These all consisted of two parts—porous lattice of various geometry and a solid back (not visible in Figure 1). The solid part was cut off in case some samples to improve the melt flow. Two methods of infiltration were tested—vacuum suction of the melt by vacuum pump and centrifugal casting. An overview of the samples and how they were prepared is summarized in Table 1.
As documented in Table 1, samples 1 and 2 and samples 5 and 6 are equivalent.

2.2. Vacuum Pump Suction

Samples 1–4 were made using the vacuum pump and technically pure zinc melt. The 3D-printed Ti-4Al-6V scaffolds without the solid backs were attached to the pump by connecting a piece made from glass, as seen in the Figure 2. To this glass piece, the scaffolds were attached either with the use of the fire-resistant silicate-based glue Technicqll or using a fine silver wire with copper filling. Suction was conducted from a melt temperature 480 °C, and the melt was cleaned by pouring into another crucible before infiltrating samples 3 and 4.

2.3. Centrifugal Casting

Samples 5–9 were prepared by centrifugal casting. In these experiments, the Zn-4Al-3Cu was used as a typical Zn-based casting alloy. The 3D-printed scaffolds were placed into rubber mold and subsequently the mold was vulcanized in the automatic vulcanization press PVM 350 CE at temperature of 150 °C, pressure of 150 bar for dwell time of 90 min. In contrast to common centrifugal casting, the scaffolds were let in the rubber mold for the infiltration process. The Zn-4Al-3Al alloy was molten in the F 50 CE furnace and the melt was kept at temperature of 480 °C. The molten alloy was transferred in a crucible to the centrifugal casting device ECO 350 CE, where the vulcanized mold with the scaffold was already rotated at 850 rpm. The outcome of several effects was studied—firstly, the position of scaffolds in the mold during casting (vertical/horizontal direction in relation to the axis of rotation); secondly, the effect of cutting off the solid parts of scaffolds, as given in Table 1.

2.4. Microstructure

The microstructure of prepared samples was investigated using an optical microscope Nikon Eclipse MA200 (Tokyo, Japan), a stereomicroscope Olympus SZX10 (Tokyo, Japan) and a scanning electron microscope TESCAN VEGA3 LMU (Brno, Czech Republic) with built-in EDS detector (Oxford Instruments, Oxford, UK). Samples were ground on silicon carbide papers (P400–P4000), polished with D2 diamond paste and a colloidal sillica suspension—either with Eposil F (for samples 1–4), or Eposil M-11 (samples 5–9). Samples 1–6 were etched for the microstructure visualization with Kroll’s etchant (5 mL HNO3, 10 mL HF, 85 mL H2O), samples 7–9 were etched with the same etchant, but diluted 1:3 with distilled water.

2.5. Mechanical Properties Testing

The compression test method was used to observe the mechanical properties of fully infiltrated samples. From these, 2 mm cubes were cut out and tested by the LabTest 5.250SP1-VM (Opava, Czech republic) universal testing machine, at deformation rate of 0.1 mm/min at room temperature. Mechanical properties of the samples, such as yield stress, ultimate stress and elastic modulus, were measured.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Infiltration Success Rate

The method of vacuum suction was overall not fully successful. The outcome of the method was uneven and unregularly infiltrated samples, as we can see in Figure 3.
In case of samples 1 and 2, quite a big part of the area was filled with the fire-resistant glue, which can be seen in Figure 4. Unfortunately, the samples 3 and 4 were not infiltrated significantly more. In addition, these samples had lower infiltration success rate, most probably due to the geometry of their lattices. The highest infiltration success rate was reached with sample 1, the rate was 53.47%.
The centrifugal casting method granted more infiltrated samples. All of them are shown in Figure 5. Samples positioned in a vertical direction in relation to the axis of rotation were fully infiltrated, regardless of the presence of the solid back part of the samples. By contrast, the results of horizontally positioned samples varied, depending on the presence of the solid back parts. Sample 7, which had its back cut off, was fully penetrated, unlike the same positioned samples 5 and 6, which had their solid backs (their infiltration success rate was 41.24% and 24.60%). Vertical axis centrifugal casting method seems to be the most suitable method, because it does not need porous material only to fully infiltrate—both sample 8 and 9 were fully infiltrated. This makes it suitable for practice, where it is expected to produce an implant with porous structure on the surface and a non-porous core.

3.2. Microstructure

Porosity effects, typical for additive manufacturing, were observed on all Ti-6Al-4V reinforcements. That includes areas of balling phenomenon and lack of fusion (green), and gas (round, red) and keyhole pores (yellow). These can be all seen in Figure 6.
Samples prepared by the vacuum suction were quite similar to each other in the matter of microstructure. Quite a considerable amount of oxidic inclusions was observed in the microstructure of all samples, even in samples where the melt was cleaned before the infiltration. Zinc oxides were mainly found at the contact surfaces with the titanium reinforcement, which can be seen in the EDS map in Figure 7.
Typical polyphase microstructure of the Zn-4Al-3Cu alloy was observed on samples made by centrifugal casting. The microstructure of the samples examined in the vertical section did not differ significantly from the microstructure in the horizontal section (Figure 8). The melt was apparently not sufficiently purified before casting, and so oxide inclusions are also observed in these samples.
Samples 5 and 6 were significant because of the different microstructure of the zinc alloy near the contact surfaces with the titanium reinforcement. EDS elemental mapping in this area does not indicate the formation of intermetallics, as seen in Figure 9. In between the titanium balls on the surface of the reinforcement, the melt probably cooled more quickly and thus formed a finer structure. In the microstructure of sample 7, this finer structure was not observed. In addition, the EDS linescan was performed at the point of direct contact between the matrix and the reinforcement, which did not show the presence of a brittle intermetallic phase.
In Figure 10, thin bands of zinc alloy around the titanium reinforcement, separated from the surrounding material, observed on the sample 8, are visible.
The EDS linescan (Figure 11), taken at the interface between the unstripped matrix and the reinforcement, does not indicate the presence of an intermetallic phase, and the microstructure of the matrix fragments remaining here is not significantly different from the rest of the matrix. The contact of the zinc melt with the titanium reinforcement was probably so rapid that the intermetallics did not have time to form.
For sample 9, higher porosity was observed despite full infiltration than for the other samples prepared by centrifugal casting. The melt was apparently not perfectly cleaned. The oxide inclusions were most likely pulled out of the sample structure during the surface treatment process to leave behind specifically shaped pores (Figure 12). Residual oxides are labelled with red arrow.
Traces of pulled out incoherent reinforcement sections were also observed in the vertical section through the sample. These, unlike the inclusion marks, are regularly spaced and rounded, as observed in Figure 13. The incoherence of the material in this case is probably due to insufficient fusion of the material during the manufacture of the reinforcement.
The microstructure is incomparable with TiAlV/Zn composite prepared by friction stir process described in [19] because that microstructure is significantly finer with residual stresses. It is possible to observe similarities in microstructure of samples of steel 3D printed scaffolds infiltrated by aluminium alloy prepared by centrifugal casting [22]. The authors distinguished intimate and nonintimate interfaces between matrix and reinforcement. Most interfaces presented in this paper are nonintimate due to the presence of powder particles on the 3D-printed scaffold surface. It was proven in this study that the temperature of 480 °C is sufficiently high for successful infiltration of Zn-based melt, but this temperature is not hight enough for creation of intermetallic phases at the interface, which happened at higher temperatures [23,24].

3.3. Uniaxial Compression Tests

The results of uniaxial compression tests are highly distorted and scattered due to the non-standard dimensions of the samples and the geometry of the scaffolds. Therefore, it is not possible to compare them with the data from the literature (see the first two rows of Table 2), only to compare the test result of the specimen and the corresponding uninfiltrated scaffold standard. The typical compression curves are given in Figure 14. The initial uninfiltrated samples taken as a standard were cut (i) fully in the porous part (labelled as standard without the back) or (ii) at the boundary between porous scaffold and bulk (labelled as standard with the back). Their comparison illustrates the influence of porosity fraction on mechanical properties and as expected, the sample with mixed (porous and bulk) structure reached higher values of compressive stress. For samples 7 (infiltrated in horizontal position) and 8 (infiltrated in vertical position), the standard is without the back, non-porous part, for sample 9 (infiltrated in vertical position) it is the standard with the back. However, even from these very scattered results, an improvement in the mechanical properties of the zinc alloy infiltrated specimens compared to the uninfiltrated scaffold standards can be observed, especially in terms of yield strength and ultimate strength.
Mechanical properties of 3D-printed scaffolds (standards) were significantly different from infiltrated samples (samples 7–9). It contrasts with samples studied in [20], where the mechanical properties are in the same order of magnitude.

4. Conclusions

TiAlV/ZnAlCu composite materials were successfully prepared using 3D-printed Ti-6Al-4V scaffolds that were infiltrated by Zn-4Al-3Cu molten alloy by centrifugal casting. The most typical Ti-based alloy was chosen for 3D printing as well as the typical Zn-based casting alloy for infiltration. Results presented in this paper prove the feasibility of infiltration process. It is promising starting point for future study with biocompatible materials. The infiltration process was successful for vertical and also for horizontal (parallel and perpendicularly to the built-up direction of 3D printing) position of the scaffold in the casting rubber mold. With this method in vertical arrangement, fully infiltrated material was prepared, independently of the presence of the solid back part. This enables the preparation of composite with Ti-based core covered by composite material. Moreover, the solidification of the melt in this process was so quick that the intermetallic phase did not have time to form. These aspects make this method suitable for practice, where it is suggested to use it to infiltrate a biomaterial with porous lattice on the surface and a solid core.
The simplified infiltration method by vacuum suction was evaluated as non-suitable, because it provides non-fully-penetrated material with unpredictable infiltration rate.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M. and D.V.; methodology, A.M. and D.V.; formal analysis, D.V. and P.L.; investigation, V.B. and A.M. and M.B.; resources, D.V.; data curation, V.B.; writing—original draft preparation, V.B.; writing—review and editing, A.M., D.V. and P.L.; visualization, V.B.; supervision, A.M. and D.V.; funding acquisition, D.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We acknowledge the infrastructural support provided by the project Mechanical Engineering of Biological and Bio-Inspired Systems, funded under project no. CZ.02.01.01/00/22_008/0004634 by the Johannes Amos Comenius Programme, call Excellent Research. The grant of Specific university research—grant No A1_FCHT_2025_011 is also acknowledged.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data used are available under the Zenodo link: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16894451.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Marin, E.; Lanzutti, A. Biomedical Applications of Titanium Alloys: A Comprehensive Review. Materials 2024, 17, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Vojtěch, D. Titan. In Kovové Materiály, 1st ed.; VŠCHT: Praha, Czech Republic, 2006; pp. 136–139. [Google Scholar]
  3. Torres, Y.; Trueba, P.; Pavon Palacio, J.; Montealegre-Meléndez, I.; Rodriguez-Ortiz, J.A. Designing, Processing and Characterisation of Titanium Cylinders with Graded Porosity: An Alternative to Stress-Shielding Solutions. Mater. Des. 2014, 63, 316–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, X.; Li, Y.; Peng, S.; Ye, B.; Lin, W.; Hu, J. Effect of Zinc Ions on Improving Implant Fixation in Osteoporotic Bone. Connect. Tissue Res. 2013, 54, 290–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sreya, P.V.; Mathew, A.M.; Gowdhami, B.; Vignesh, K.; Swathi, C.M.; Venkatesan, K.; Kadalmani, B.; Pattanayak, D.K. Biomimetic Surface Functionalization of Ti Metal Incorporated with Ca-Zn and Evaluation of In-Vitro Biological Properties. Surf. Interfaces 2023, 42, 103425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chen, Q.; Thouas, G.A. Metallic Implant Biomaterials. Mater. Sci. Eng. R 2015, 87, 1–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li, G.; Yang, H.; Zheng, Y.; Chen, X.-H.; Yang, J.-A.; Zhu, D.; Ruan, L.; Takashima, K. Challenges in the Use of Zinc and Its Alloys as Biodegradable Metals: Perspective from Biomechanical Compatibility. Acta Biomater. 2019, 97, 23–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kaur, K.; Gupta, R.; Saraf, S.A.; Saraf, S.K. Zinc: The Metal of Life. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2014, 13, 358–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Andreini, C.; Bertini, I. A Bioinformatics View of Zinc Enzymes. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2012, 111, 150–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Deng, Z.; Xu, K.; Tian, Y.; Lou, M.; Xue, R.; Zhang, L.; Liu, L.; Chang, K. Experimental Investigation and Thermodynamic Re-Assessment of the Ti–Zn System and Atomic Mobility of Its Bcc Phase. Calphad 2022, 76, 102392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tan, Y.; Lu, Z.; Li, Z.; Tao, X.; Ouyang, Y.; Du, Y. Investigation on Diffusion Characteristics and Mechanical Properties of Ti–Zn System. Intermetallics 2023, 154, 107794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Michna, Š.; Nová, I. Progresivní Technologie Odlévání. In Technologie a Zpracování Kovových Materiálů; Adin: Prešov, Slovakia, 2008; pp. 130–174. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kharat, V.J.; Singh, P.; Sharath Raju, G.; Kumar Yadav, D.; Satyanarayana; Gupta, M.; Arun, V.; Hussein Majeed, A.; Singh, N. Additive Manufacturing (3D Printing): A Review of Materials, Methods, Applications and Challenges. Mater. Today Proc. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yuan, L.; Ding, S.; Wen, C. Additive Manufacturing Technology for Porous Metal Implant Applications and Triple Minimal Surface Structures: A Review. Bioact. Mater. 2019, 4, 56–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Meng, M.; Wang, J.; Huang, H.; Liu, X.; Zhang, J.; Li, Z. 3D Printing Metal Implants in Orthopedic Surgery: Methods, Applications and Future Prospects. J. Orthop. Transl. 2023, 42, 94–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, S.; Ning, J.; Zhu, L.; Yang, Z.; Yan, W.; Dun, Y.; Xue, P.; Xu, P.; Bose, S.; Bandyopadhyay, A. Role of Porosity Defects in Metal 3D Printing: Formation Mechanisms, Impacts on Properties and Mitigation Strategies. Mater. Today 2022, 59, 133–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Chia, H.Y.; Yan, W. Mechanism of Keyhole Pore Formation in Metal Additive Manufacturing. NPJ Comput. Mater. 2022, 8, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lv, Y.; Ding, Z.; Xue, J.; Sha, G.; Lu, E.; Wang, L.; Lu, W.; Su, C.; Zhang, L.-C. Deformation Mechanisms in Surface Nano-Crystallization of Low Elastic Modulus Ti6Al4V/Zn Composite during Severe Plastic Deformation. Scr. Mater. 2018, 157, 142–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lv, Y.; Ding, Z.; Sun, X.; Li, L.; Sha, G.; Liu, R.; Wang, L. Gradient Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of Ti-6Al-4V/Zn Composite Prepared by Friction Stir Processing. Materials 2019, 12, 2795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Huang, S.-J.; Li, C.; Feng, J.-H.; Selvaraju, S.; Subramani, M. Mechanical and Corrosion Tests for Magnesium–Zinc/Ti-6Al-4V Composites by Gravity Casting. Materials 2024, 17, 1836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fousová, M.; Vojtěch, D.; Kubásek, J.; Jablonská, E.; Fojt, J. Promising Characteristics of Gradient Porosity Ti-6Al-4V Alloy Prepared by SLM Process for Bone Implant Applications. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2017, 69, 368–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Nunes, H.; Emadinia, O.; Costa, J.; Madureira, R.; Soares, R.; Silva, J.; Frada, I.; Anjos, V.; Viana, F.; Vieira, M.; et al. Infiltration of Aluminum in 3D-Printed Metallic Inserts. Appl. Res. 2023, 2, e202200062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Brice, D.A.; Samimi, P.; Ghamarian, I.; Liu, Y.; Mendoza, M.Y.; Kenney, M.J.; Reidy, R.F.; Garcia-Avila, M.; Collins, P.C. On the Eutectoid Transformation Behavior of the Ti–Zn System and Its Metastable Phases. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 718, 22–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Vassilev, G.P.; Liu, X.J.; Ishida, K. Reaction Kinetics and Phase Diagram Studies in the Ti–Zn System. J. Alloys Compd. 2004, 375, 162–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Properties: Titanium Alloys—Ti6Al4V Grade 5. AZoM. Available online: https://www.azom.com/properties.aspx?ArticleID=1547 (accessed on 1 June 2024).
  26. Properties: Zinc and Its Uses. AZoM. Available online: https://www.azom.com/properties.aspx?ArticleID=749 (accessed on 1 June 2024).
Figure 1. Detail of the used samples structures—scaffold types (A) gyroid, (B) diamond large, (C) diamond small.
Figure 1. Detail of the used samples structures—scaffold types (A) gyroid, (B) diamond large, (C) diamond small.
Materials 18 04690 g001
Figure 2. Vacuum suction method: (a) glass connecting piece, (b) sample attached with glue, (c) attached with wire.
Figure 2. Vacuum suction method: (a) glass connecting piece, (b) sample attached with glue, (c) attached with wire.
Materials 18 04690 g002
Figure 3. Samples 1–4, prepared by vacuum suction method.
Figure 3. Samples 1–4, prepared by vacuum suction method.
Materials 18 04690 g003
Figure 4. Fire-resistant glue and zinc oxide in sample 2.
Figure 4. Fire-resistant glue and zinc oxide in sample 2.
Materials 18 04690 g004
Figure 5. Samples 5–9, prepared by centrifugal casting.
Figure 5. Samples 5–9, prepared by centrifugal casting.
Materials 18 04690 g005
Figure 6. Porosity effects visible in the scaffolds. Gas pores are marked with red, keyholes with yellow and areas with lack of fusion with green.
Figure 6. Porosity effects visible in the scaffolds. Gas pores are marked with red, keyholes with yellow and areas with lack of fusion with green.
Materials 18 04690 g006
Figure 7. EDS element map of the detail of sample 3.
Figure 7. EDS element map of the detail of sample 3.
Materials 18 04690 g007
Figure 8. Vertical and horizontal section of sample 8.
Figure 8. Vertical and horizontal section of sample 8.
Materials 18 04690 g008
Figure 9. EDS element map of the fine structure of sample 6.
Figure 9. EDS element map of the fine structure of sample 6.
Materials 18 04690 g009
Figure 10. Separated thin bands of the matrix on sample 8.
Figure 10. Separated thin bands of the matrix on sample 8.
Materials 18 04690 g010
Figure 11. EDS linescan of sample 8.
Figure 11. EDS linescan of sample 8.
Materials 18 04690 g011
Figure 12. Traces of inclusions in sample 9.
Figure 12. Traces of inclusions in sample 9.
Materials 18 04690 g012
Figure 13. Specifically shaped pores after removal of the reinforcement on sample 9.
Figure 13. Specifically shaped pores after removal of the reinforcement on sample 9.
Materials 18 04690 g013
Figure 14. Compression test curves—example for each sample type.
Figure 14. Compression test curves—example for each sample type.
Materials 18 04690 g014
Table 1. Overview of the samples.
Table 1. Overview of the samples.
Sample NumberLattice StructureSolid BackMethodNotes
1B×vacuum suctionattached with glue
2B×vacuum suctionattached with glue
3C×vacuum suctionattached with wire
4A×vacuum suctionattached with wire
5Bcentrifugal castinghorizontal position
6Bcentrifugal castinghorizontal position
7B×centrifugal castinghorizontal position
8B×centrifugal castingvertical position
9Bcentrifugal castingvertical position
Table 2. Results of the uniaxial compression tests form Figure 14 (average of 3 measurements).
Table 2. Results of the uniaxial compression tests form Figure 14 (average of 3 measurements).
SampleRp0.2 (MPa)Rm (MPa)Elastic Modulus (MPa)
Ti-6Al-4V (bulk)8481080[25]
Zn75160[26]
Standard without the back75 ± 17123 ± 1127 ± 3
Standard with the back124 ± 23168 ± 942 ± 3
Sample 7287 ± 23556 ± 3857 ± 2
Sample 8421 ± 29669 ± 2149 ± 5
Sample 9332 ± 55539 ± 3546 ± 2
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Balejová, V.; Michalcová, A.; Bašistová, M.; Lichý, P.; Vojtěch, D. Ti-Al-V/Zn-Al-Cu Composite Materials Prepared by Zinc Melt Infiltration Technology. Materials 2025, 18, 4690. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18204690

AMA Style

Balejová V, Michalcová A, Bašistová M, Lichý P, Vojtěch D. Ti-Al-V/Zn-Al-Cu Composite Materials Prepared by Zinc Melt Infiltration Technology. Materials. 2025; 18(20):4690. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18204690

Chicago/Turabian Style

Balejová, Veronika, Alena Michalcová, Martina Bašistová, Petr Lichý, and Dalibor Vojtěch. 2025. "Ti-Al-V/Zn-Al-Cu Composite Materials Prepared by Zinc Melt Infiltration Technology" Materials 18, no. 20: 4690. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18204690

APA Style

Balejová, V., Michalcová, A., Bašistová, M., Lichý, P., & Vojtěch, D. (2025). Ti-Al-V/Zn-Al-Cu Composite Materials Prepared by Zinc Melt Infiltration Technology. Materials, 18(20), 4690. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18204690

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop