Next Article in Journal
Inverting Two-Stage Step-Up Converters
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of Green Bonds and Energy Use on Carbon Dioxide Emissions: Evidence from 17 Financially Developed Countries (2014–2023)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Experimental Assessment and Digital Twin Modeling of Integrated AEM Electrolyzer–PEM Fuel Cell–BESS for Smart Hydrogen Energy Applications

by
A. H. Samitha Weerakoon
and
Mohsen Assadi
*
Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Stavanger, 4021 Stavanger, Norway
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2025, 18(23), 6318; https://doi.org/10.3390/en18236318 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 28 October 2025 / Revised: 21 November 2025 / Accepted: 28 November 2025 / Published: 30 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Section A5: Hydrogen Energy)

Abstract

Rising energy demand, fossil fuel depletion, and global warming are accelerating research into sustainable energy solutions, with growing interest in hydrogen as a promising alternative. This research presents a detailed experimental investigation and novel digital twin (DT) models for an integrated hydrogen-based energy system consisting of an Anion Exchange Membrane Electrolyzer (AEMEL), Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell (PEMFC), hydrogen storage, and Battery Energy Storage System (BESS). Conducted at a real-world facility in Risavika, Norway, the study employed commercial units: the Enapter EL 4.1 AEM electrolyzer and Intelligent Energy IE-Lift 1T/1U PEMFC. Experimental tests under dynamic load conditions demonstrated stable operation, achieving hydrogen production rates of up to 512 NL/h and a specific power consumption of 4.2 kWh/Nm3, surpassing the manufacturer’s specifications. The PEMFC exhibited a unique cyclic operational mechanism addressing cathode water flooding, a critical issue in fuel cell systems, achieving steady-state efficiencies around 43.6% under prolonged (190 min) rated-power operation. Subsequently, advanced DT models were developed for both devices: a physics-informed interpolation model for the AEMEL, selected due to its linear and steady operational behavior, and an ANN-based model for the PEMFC to capture its inherently nonlinear, dynamically fluctuating characteristics. Both models were validated, showing excellent predictive accuracy (<3.8% deviation). The DTs integrated manufacturer constraints, accurately modeling transient behaviors, safety logic, and operational efficiency. The round-trip efficiency of the integrated system was calculated (~27%), highlighting the inherent efficiency trade-offs for autonomous hydrogen-based energy storage. This research significantly advances our understanding of integrated H2 systems, providing robust DT frameworks for predictive diagnostics, operational optimization, and performance analysis, supporting the broader deployment and management of hydrogen technologies.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Weerakoon, A.H.S.; Assadi, M. Experimental Assessment and Digital Twin Modeling of Integrated AEM Electrolyzer–PEM Fuel Cell–BESS for Smart Hydrogen Energy Applications. Energies 2025, 18, 6318. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18236318

AMA Style

Weerakoon AHS, Assadi M. Experimental Assessment and Digital Twin Modeling of Integrated AEM Electrolyzer–PEM Fuel Cell–BESS for Smart Hydrogen Energy Applications. Energies. 2025; 18(23):6318. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18236318

Chicago/Turabian Style

Weerakoon, A. H. Samitha, and Mohsen Assadi. 2025. "Experimental Assessment and Digital Twin Modeling of Integrated AEM Electrolyzer–PEM Fuel Cell–BESS for Smart Hydrogen Energy Applications" Energies 18, no. 23: 6318. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18236318

APA Style

Weerakoon, A. H. S., & Assadi, M. (2025). Experimental Assessment and Digital Twin Modeling of Integrated AEM Electrolyzer–PEM Fuel Cell–BESS for Smart Hydrogen Energy Applications. Energies, 18(23), 6318. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18236318

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop