# Assessing Global Long-Term EROI of Gas: A Net-Energy Perspective on the Energy Transition

^{1}

^{2}

^{3}

^{4}

^{*}

## Abstract

**:**

## 1. Introduction

#### 1.1. Gross and Net Energy

#### 1.2. Eroi of Gas at Global Scale

#### 1.3. Eroi of Gas at Local, Regional or National Scale

## 2. Materials and Methods

#### 2.1. Gas Production Model

#### 2.2. EROIs Yearly Values

#### 2.2.1. EROIs Estimates

#### 2.2.2. EROIs Dynamic Functions

## 3. Results

#### 3.1. Net vs. Gross Energy from Gas

#### 3.2. Scenario-Based Sensitivity Analysis

#### 3.2.1. EROI Estimates

#### 3.2.2. Dynamic Functions

#### 3.3. Robustness of the Results

## 4. Discussion

#### 4.1. Implications for the Low-Carbon Energy Transition

#### 4.2. On the Need of Net-Energy Studies

#### 4.3. Limitations and Future Work

## 5. Conclusions

## Author Contributions

## Funding

## Data Availability Statement

## Acknowledgments

## Conflicts of Interest

## Abbreviations

CBM | Coal Bed Methanes |

DNV | Det Norske Veritas |

EIA | Energy Information Administration |

EROI | Energy Return On Investment |

GEFC | Gas Exporting Countries Forum |

IEA | International Energy Agency |

INRIA | French National Institute for Research in Digital Science and Technology |

NEA | Net Energy Analysis |

OPEC | Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries |

PROI | Power Return On Investment |

STGs | Shale/Tight Gases |

URR | Ultimately Recoverable Resources |

WEC | World Energy Council |

## References

- Bristish Petroleum Statistical Review of World Energy. 2020. Available online: https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/business-sites/en/global/corporate/pdfs/news-and-insights/speeches/bp-stats-review-2019-bob-dudley-speech.pdf (accessed on 15 July 2021).
- Costa, D.; Jesus, J.; Branco, D.; Danko, A.; Fiúza, A. Extensive review of shale gas environmental impacts from scientific literature (2010–2015). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.
**2017**, 24, 14579–14594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - IPCC. Climate Change 2021 The Physical Science Basis. In Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Working Group I Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report; IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Loftus, P.J.; Cohen, A.M.; Long, J.C.S.; Jenkins, J.D. A critical review of global decarbonization scenarios: What do they tell us about feasibility? Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Chang.
**2014**, 6, 93–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Heard, B.; Brook, B.; Wigley, T.; Bradshaw, C. Burden of proof: A comprehensive review of the feasibility of 100% renewable-electricity systems. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
**2017**, 76, 1122–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Smil, V. Energy Transitions: Global and National Perspectives; Praeger, an Imprint of ABC-CLIO, LLC: Santa Barbara, CA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Napp, T.; Bernie, D.; Thomas, R.; Lowe, J.; Hawkes, A.; Gambhir, A. Exploring the Feasibility of Low-Carbon Scenarios Using Historical Energy Transitions Analysis. Energies
**2017**, 10, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Brown, T.; Bischof-Niemz, T.; Blok, K.; Breyer, C.; Lund, H.; Mathiesen, B. Response to ‘Burden of proof: A comprehensive review of the feasibility of 100% renewable-electricity systems’. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
**2018**, 92, 834–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - King, L.C.; van den Bergh, J.C.J.M. Implications of net energy-return-on-investment for a low-carbon energy transition. Nat. Energy
**2018**, 3, 334–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Sers, M.R.; Victor, P.A. The Energy-emissions Trap. Ecol. Econ.
**2018**, 151, 10–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Vidal, O.; Boulzec, H.L.; François, C. Modelling the material and energy costs of the transition to low-carbon energy. EPJ Web Conf.
**2018**, 189, 00018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Jewell, J.; Cherp, A. On the political feasibility of climate change mitigation pathways: Is it too late to keep warming below 1.5 °C? WIREs Clim. Chang.
**2019**, 11, e621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Capellán-Pérez, I.; de Blas, I.; Nieto, J.; de Castro, C.; Miguel, L.J.; Carpintero, Ó.; Mediavilla, M.; Lobejón, L.F.; Ferreras-Alonso, N.; Rodrigo, P.; et al. MEDEAS: A new modeling framework integrating global biophysical and socioeconomic constraints. Energy Environ. Sci.
**2020**, 13, 986–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Nieto, J.; Carpintero, Ó.; Miguel, L.J.; de Blas, I. Macroeconomic modelling under energy constraints: Global low carbon transition scenarios. Energy Policy
**2020**, 137, 111090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Moriarty, P.; Honnery, D. Feasibility of a 100% Global Renewable Energy System. Energies
**2020**, 13, 5543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Dupont, E.; Germain, M.; Jeanmart, H. Feasibility and Economic Impacts of the Energy Transition. Sustainability
**2021**, 13, 5345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Smil, V. Natural Gas: Fuel for the 21st Century; John Wiley and Sons Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Gürsan, C.; de Gooyert, V. The systemic impact of a transition fuel: Does natural gas help or hinder the energy transition? Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
**2021**, 138, 110552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Murphy, D.J. The implications of the declining energy return on investment of oil production. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci.
**2014**, 372, 20130126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Carbajales-Dale, M.; Barnhart, C.J.; Brandt, A.R.; Benson, S.M. A better currency for investing in a sustainable future. Nat. Clim. Chang.
**2014**, 4, 524–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Rana, R.L.; Lombardi, M.; Giungato, P.; Tricase, C. Trends in Scientific Literature on Energy Return Ratio of Renewable Energy Sources for Supporting Policymakers. Adm. Sci.
**2020**, 10, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Hall, C. Migration and Metabolism in a Temperate Stream Ecosystem. Ecology
**1972**, 53, 585–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hall, C. Energy Return on Investment; Springer International Publishing: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raugei, M. Net energy analysis must not compare apples and oranges. Nat. Energy
**2019**, 4, 86–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Buchanan, M. Energy costs. Nat. Phys.
**2019**, 15, 520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Murphy, D.J.; Hall, C.A.; Dale, M.; Cleveland, C. Order from Chaos: A Preliminary Protocol for Determining the EROI of Fuels. Sustainability
**2011**, 3, 1888–1907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Carbajales-Dale, M. When is EROI Not EROI? BioPhysical Econ. Resour. Qual.
**2019**, 4, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Hall, C.A.; Lambert, J.G.; Balogh, S.B. EROI of different fuels and the implications for society. Energy Policy
**2014**, 64, 141–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - White, E.; Kramer, G.J. The Changing Meaning of Energy Return on Investment and the Implications for the Prospects of Post-fossil Civilization. ONE Earth
**2019**, 1, 416–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Court, V.; Fizaine, F. Long-Term Estimates of the Energy-Return-on-Investment (EROI) of Coal, Oil, and Gas Global Productions. Ecol. Econ.
**2017**, 138, 145–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gagnon, N.; Hall, C.; Brinker, L. A Preliminary Investigation of Energy Return on Energy Investment for Global Oil and Gas Production. Energies
**2009**, 2, 490–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Brandt, A.R.; Sun, Y.; Bharadwaj, S.; Livingston, D.; Tan, E.; Gordon, D. Energy Return on Investment (EROI) for Forty Global Oilfields Using a Detailed Engineering-Based Model of Oil Production. PLoS ONE
**2015**, 10, e0144141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Dale, M.; Krumdieck, S.; Bodger, P. Net energy yield from production of conventional oil. Energy Policy
**2011**, 39, 7095–7102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Tollefson, J. Is the 2 °C world a fantasy? Nature
**2015**, 527, 436–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Raftery, A.E.; Zimmer, A.; Frierson, D.M.W.; Startz, R.; Liu, P. Less than 2 °C warming by 2100 unlikely. Nat. Clim. Chang.
**2017**, 7, 637–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Brockway, P.E.; Owen, A.; Brand-Correa, L.I.; Hardt, L. Estimation of global final-stage energy-return-on-investment for fossil fuels with comparison to renewable energy sources. Nat. Energy
**2019**, 4, 612–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Capellán-Pérez, I.; de Castro, C.; González, L.J.M. Dynamic Energy Return on Energy Investment (EROI) and material requirements in scenarios of global transition to renewable energies. Energy Strategy Rev.
**2019**, 26, 100399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gately, M. The EROI of U.S. offshore energy extraction: A net energy analysis of the Gulf of Mexico. Ecol. Econ.
**2007**, 63, 355–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Guilford, M.C.; Hall, C.A.; O’Connor, P.; Cleveland, C.J. A New Long Term Assessment of Energy Return on Investment (EROI) for U.S. Oil and Gas Discovery and Production. Sustainability
**2011**, 3, 1866–1887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Moerschbaecher, M.; Day, J.W., Jr. Ultra-Deepwater Gulf of Mexico Oil and Gas: Energy Return on Financial Investment and a Preliminary Assessment of Energy Return on Energy Investment. Sustainability
**2011**, 3, 2009–2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Freise, J. The EROI of Conventional Canadian Natural Gas Production. Sustainability
**2011**, 3, 2080–2104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Sell, B.; Murphy, D.; Hall, C.A. Energy Return on Energy Invested for Tight Gas Wells in the Appalachian Basin, United States of America. Sustainability
**2011**, 3, 1986–2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Poisson, A.; Hall, C. Time Series EROI for Canadian Oil and Gas. Energies
**2013**, 6, 5940–5959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Aucott, M.L.; Melillo, J.M. A Preliminary Energy Return on Investment Analysis of Natural Gas from the Marcellus Shale. J. Ind. Ecol.
**2013**, 17, 668–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Dale, A.T.; Khanna, V.; Vidic, R.D.; Bilec, M.M. Process Based Life-Cycle Assessment of Natural Gas from the Marcellus Shale. Environ. Sci. Technol.
**2013**, 47, 5459–5466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Nogovitsyn, R.; Sokolov, A. Preliminary Calculation of the EROI for the Production of Gas in Russia. Sustainability
**2014**, 6, 6751–6765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Yaritani, H.; Matsushima, J. Analysis of the Energy Balance of Shale Gas Development. Energies
**2014**, 7, 2207–2227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Moeller, D.; Murphy, D. Net Energy Analysis of Gas Production from the Marcellus Shale. BioPhysical Econ. Resour. Qual.
**2016**, 1, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Siažik, J.; Malcho, M.; Čaja, A. Calculation of the EROIE coefficient for natural gas hydrates in laboratory conditions. AIP Conf. Proc.
**2017**, 020036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - de Luna Marques, A.; de Queiroz Fernandes Araújo, O.; Cammarota, M.C. Biogas from microalgae: An overview emphasizing pretreatment methods and their energy return on investment (EROI). Biotechnol. Lett.
**2018**, 41, 193–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Hu, Y.; Hall, C.A.; Wang, J.; Feng, L.; Poisson, A. Energy Return on Investment (EROI) of China’s conventional fossil fuels: Historical and future trends. Energy
**2013**, 54, 352–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Kong, Z.; Dong, X.; Liu, G. Coal-based synthetic natural gas vs. imported natural gas in China: A net energy perspective. J. Clean. Prod.
**2016**, 131, 690–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Kong, Z.Y.; Dong, X.C.; Shao, Q.; Wan, X.; Tang, D.L.; Liu, G.X. The potential of domestic production and imports of oil and gas in China: An energy return on investment perspective. Pet. Sci.
**2016**, 13, 788–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Lior, N. Exergy, Energy, and Gas Flow Analysis of Hydrofractured Shale Gas Extraction. J. Energy Resour. Technol.
**2016**, 138, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Wang, J.L.; Feng, J.X.; Bentley, Y.; Feng, L.Y.; Qu, H. A review of physical supply and EROI of fossil fuels in China. Pet. Sci.
**2017**, 14, 806–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Wang, J.; Liu, M.; McLellan, B.C.; Tang, X.; Feng, L. Environmental impacts of shale gas development in China: A hybrid life cycle analysis. Resour. Conserv. Recycl.
**2017**, 120, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Kong, Z.Y.; Dong, X.C.; Lu, X.; Wan, X. Energy return on investment, energy payback time, and greenhouse gas emissions of coal seam gas (CSG) production in China: A case of the Fanzhuang CSG project. Pet. Sci.
**2017**, 15, 185–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Kong, Z.; Jiang, Q.; Dong, X.; Wang, J.; Wan, X. Estimation of China’s production efficiency of natural gas hydrates in the South China Sea. J. Clean. Prod.
**2018**, 203, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Kong, Z.; Lu, X.; Dong, X.; Jiang, Q.; Elbot, N. Re-evaluation of energy return on investment (EROI) for China’s natural gas imports using an integrative approach. Energy Strategy Rev.
**2018**, 22, 179–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Cheng, C.; Wang, Z.; Wang, J.; Liu, M.; Ren, X. Domestic oil and gas or imported oil and gas – An energy return on investment perspective. Resour. Conserv. Recycl.
**2018**, 136, 63–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Chen, Y.; Feng, L.; Tang, S.; Wang, J.; Huang, C.; Höök, M. Extended-exergy based energy return on investment method and its application to shale gas extraction in China. J. Clean. Prod.
**2020**, 260, 120933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Smith, M.R. Forecasting Oil & Gas Supply And Activity. Oil Age
**2015**, 1, 35–58. [Google Scholar] - Maggio, G.; Cacciola, G. When will oil, natural gas, and coal peak? Fuel
**2012**, 98, 111–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Mohr, S.; Wang, J.; Ellem, G.; Ward, J.; Giurco, D. Projection of world fossil fuels by country. Fuel
**2015**, 141, 120–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - DNV. Energy Transition Outlook; Det Norske Veritas: Oslo, Norway, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- GEFC. Global Gas Outlook 2050 Synopsis. Gas Export. Ctries. Forum
**2021**. Available online: https://www.gecf.org/insights/global-gas-outlook?d=2021&p=1 (accessed on 15 July 2021). - IEA. World Energy Outlook; International Energy Agency: Paris, France, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Tan, L.; Zuo, L.; Wang, B. Methods of Decline Curve Analysis for Shale Gas Reservoirs. Energies
**2018**, 11, 552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Kontorovich, A.; Epov, M.; Eder, L. Long-term and medium-term scenarios and factors in world energy perspectives for the 21st century. Russ. Geol. Geophys.
**2014**, 55, 534–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Laherrère, J. Club de Nice XVIII forum 1er décembre 2020. Bilan et perspectives énergétiques mondiales. Evolution de l’énergie: Pics passés, présents et futurs. ASPO France
**2020**. Available online: https://aspofrance.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/jean-laherrere-nice2020-cor6dec-presentation.pdf (accessed on 15 July 2021). - Valero, A.; Valero, A. Physical geonomics: Combining the exergy and Hubbert peak analysis for predicting mineral resources depletion. Resour. Conserv. Recycl.
**2010**, 54, 1074–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wang, J.; Bentley, Y. Modelling world natural gas production. Energy Rep.
**2020**, 6, 1363–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Kober, T.; Schiffer, H.W.; Densing, M.; Panos, E. Global energy perspectives to 2060—WEC’s World Energy Scenarios 2019. Energy Strategy Rev.
**2020**, 31, 100523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zou, C.; Zhao, Q.; Zhang, G.; Xiong, B. Energy revolution: From a fossil energy era to a new energy era. Nat. Gas Ind. B
**2016**, 3, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - EIA. Annual Energy Outlook; Energy Information Administration: Washington, DC, USA, 2021.
- Azari, M.; Hamza, F.; Hadibeik, H.; Ramakrishna, S. Well-Testing Challenges in Unconventional and Tight Gas Reservoirs. In Proceedings of the SPE Western Regional Meeting, Garden Grove, CA, USA, 26 April 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- OPEC. World Oil Outlook 2045; Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries: Vienna, Austria, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- IEA. Natural Gas Information: Database Documentation; International Energy Agency: Paris, France, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- McGlade, C.; Ekins, P. The geographical distribution of fossil fuels unused when limiting global warming to 2 °C. Nature
**2015**, 517, 187–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Jones, J. Energy-Return-On-Energy-Invested (EROEI) For Crude Oil and Other Sources of Energy. J. Pet. Environ. Biotechnol.
**2013**, 4, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Delannoy, L.; Longaretti, P.Y.; Murphy, D.J.; Prados, E. Peak oil and the low-carbon energy transition: A net-energy perspective. Appl. Energy
**2021**. submitted. [Google Scholar] - Heun, M.K.; de Wit, M. Energy return on (energy) invested (EROI), oil prices, and energy transitions. Energy Policy
**2012**, 40, 147–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Pearce, J.M. Thermodynamic limitations to nuclear energy deployment as a greenhouse gas mitigation technology. Int. J. Nucl. Gov. Econ. Ecol.
**2008**, 2, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - de Castro, C.; Capellán-Pérez, I. Standard, Point of Use, and Extended Energy Return on Energy Invested (EROI) from Comprehensive Material Requirements of Present Global Wind, Solar, and Hydro Power Technologies. Energies
**2020**, 13, 3036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wang, C.; Zhang, L.; Chang, Y.; Pang, M. Energy return on investment (EROI) of biomass conversion systems in China: Meta-analysis focused on system boundary unification. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
**2021**, 137, 110652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - King, C.W.; Hall, C.A. Relating Financial and Energy Return on Investment. Sustainability
**2011**, 3, 1810–1832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - King, C.; Maxwell, J.; Donovan, A. Comparing World Economic and Net Energy Metrics, Part 1: Single Technology and Commodity Perspective. Energies
**2015**, 8, 12949–12974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - King, C.; Maxwell, J.; Donovan, A. Comparing World Economic and Net Energy Metrics, Part 2: Total Economy Expenditure Perspective. Energies
**2015**, 8, 12975–12996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - King, C. Comparing World Economic and Net Energy Metrics, Part 3: Macroeconomic Historical and Future Perspectives. Energies
**2015**, 8, 12997–13020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Smil, V. Energy and Civilization; MIT Press Ltd.: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]

**Table 1.**Two-dimensional EROI nomenclature: boundaries for energy inputs and outputs. Source: Murphy et al. [26].

Energy Inputs | Extraction | Processing | End-Use |
---|---|---|---|

Direct energy and material | EROI${}_{1,d}$ | EROI${}_{2,d}$ | EROI${}_{3,d}$ |

Indirect energy and material | EROI${}_{stnd}$ | EROI${}_{2,i}$ | EROI${}_{3,i}$ |

Indirect labor consumption | EROI${}_{1,lab}$ | EROI${}_{2,lab}$ | EROI${}_{3,lab}$ |

Auxiliary services consumption | EROI${}_{1,aux}$ | EROI${}_{2,aux}$ | EROI${}_{3,aux}$ |

Environment | EROI${}_{1,env}$ | EROI${}_{2,env}$ | EROI${}_{3,env}$ |

**Table 2.**Identified models forecasting global gas supply, sorted by descending score (total number of criteria met).

Authors | Ref. | Time | Subdivision | Access | Reliability | Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

GlobalShift | [62] | 1950–2050 | 🗸 | 🗸 | 🗸 | 3 |

Maggio & Cacciola | [63] | 1940–2060 | 🗸 | 🗸 | × | 2 |

Mohr et al. | [64] | 1900–2300 | 🗸 | 🗸 | × | 2 |

DNV | [65] | 1980–2050 | × | 🗸 | × | 1 |

GEFC | [66] | 2000–2050 | 🗸 | × | × | 1 |

IEA | [67,68] | 1995–2040 | 🗸 | × | × | 1 |

Kontorovich et al. | [69] | 1900–2040 | × | 🗸 | × | 1 |

Laherrère | [70] | 1900–2150 | × | 🗸 | × | 1 |

Valero & Valero | [71] | 1900–2150 | × | 🗸 | × | 1 |

Wang & Bentley | [72] | 1990–2050 | × | 🗸 | × | 1 |

WEC | [73] | 1970–2060 | 🗸 | × | × | 1 |

Zou et al. | [74] | 1800–2200 | × | 🗸 | × | 1 |

BP | [1] | 1900–2050 | × | × | × | 0 |

EIA | [75,76] | 1980–2054 | × | × | × | 0 |

OPEC | [77] | 2019–2045 | × | × | × | 0 |

**Table 3.**Indicative Gross Heating Value of natural gas of the ten major producing countries. Source: IEA (2021) [78].

Country | Conversion Factor (PJ/bcm) | Production in 2018 (Mtoe) |
---|---|---|

United States | 38.53 | 719.0 |

Russia | 38.23 | 606.6 |

Iran | 39.36 | 190.6 |

Canada | 39.07 | 154.7 |

Qatar | 41.40 | 147.4 |

China | 38.93 | 135.3 |

Norway | 39.47 | 106.4 |

Australia | 39.76 | 101.2 |

Algeria | 39.57 | 82.6 |

Saudi Arabia | 38.00 | 79.1 |

Gas Type | Low | Medium | High | Source | EROI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|

Field gas | EROI${}_{\tilde{CF},1}$ | EROI${}_{\tilde{CF},2}$ | EROI${}_{\tilde{CF},3}$ | [30,72,79] | EROI${}_{1,lab}$ |

Shale-Tight gas | 32 | 51.9 | 82 | [44,54,56,61] | EROI${}_{stnd}$ |

Coal Bed Methane | 10 | 12.5 | 15 | [57] | EROI${}_{stnd}$ |

Offshore 0–500 m | EROI${}_{\tilde{CF},1}$ | EROI${}_{\tilde{CF},2}$ | EROI${}_{\tilde{CF},3}$ | [30,72,79] | EROI${}_{1,lab}$ |

Offshore 500–1000 m | 34.2 | 42.8 | 51.3 | [80] | EROI${}_{stnd}$ |

Offshore 1000–2000 m | 23.05 | 29.6 | 39.2 | [38,40] | EROI${}_{stnd}$ |

Offshore +2000 m | 11.9 | 16.4 | 27.1 | [40] | EROI${}_{stnd}$ |

**Table 5.**Summary of EROI dynamic functions (DF), with EROI${\left(y\right)}_{0}$ being the initial EROI value at the year 1950. They apply as long as EROI$\left(y\right)$ is greater or equal to 1, which is the minimum value EROI can hypothetically reach.

Definition | Mathematical Formulation | |
---|---|---|

DF1 | Constant | $\mathrm{EROI}\left(y\right)=\mathrm{EROI}\left({y}_{0}\right)$ |

DF2 | Linear decrease | $\mathrm{EROI}\left(y\right)=\left(\right)open="\{"\; close="\}">\begin{array}{cc}\mathrm{EROI}\left({y}_{0}\right),\hfill & \phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\mathrm{for}\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}y{y}_{D}\hfill \\ \mathrm{EROI}\left({y}_{0}\right)-{\delta}_{I}\times (y-{y}_{D}),\hfill & \phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\mathrm{for}\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}y\u2a7e{y}_{D}\hfill \end{array}$ |

DF3 | Linear decrease | $\mathrm{EROI}\left(y\right)=\left(\right)open="\{"\; close="\}">\begin{array}{cc}\mathrm{EROI}\left({y}_{0}\right),\hfill & \phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\mathrm{for}\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}y{y}_{D}\hfill \\ \mathrm{EROI}\left({y}_{0}\right)-{\delta}_{II}\times (y-{y}_{D}),\hfill & \phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\mathrm{for}\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}y\u2a7e{y}_{D}\hfill \end{array}$ |

DF4 | Geometric decrease | $\mathrm{EROI}\left(y\right)=\left(\right)open="\{"\; close="\}">\begin{array}{cc}\mathrm{EROI}\left({y}_{0}\right),\hfill & \phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\mathrm{for}\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}y{y}_{D}\hfill \\ {\gamma}_{I}\times \mathrm{EROI}(y-1),\hfill & \phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\mathrm{for}\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}y\u2a7e{y}_{D}\hfill \end{array}$ |

DF4 | Geometric decrease | $\mathrm{EROI}\left(y\right)=\left(\right)open="\{"\; close="\}">\begin{array}{cc}\mathrm{EROI}\left({y}_{0}\right),\hfill & \phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\mathrm{for}\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}y{y}_{D}\hfill \\ {\gamma}_{II}\times \mathrm{EROI}(y-1),\hfill & \phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\mathrm{for}\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}y\u2a7e{y}_{D}\hfill \end{array}$ |

DF6 | Exponential decrease | $\mathrm{EROI}\left(y\right)=\left(\right)open="\{"\; close="\}">\begin{array}{cc}\mathrm{EROI}\left({y}_{0}\right),\hfill & \phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\mathrm{for}\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}y{y}_{D}\hfill \\ \mathrm{EROI}\left({y}_{0}\right)-{e}^{\frac{y-{y}_{D}}{{\tau}_{I}}},\hfill & \phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\mathrm{for}\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}y\u2a7e{y}_{D}\hfill \end{array}$ |

DF7 | Exponential decrease | $\mathrm{EROI}\left(y\right)=\left(\right)open="\{"\; close="\}">\begin{array}{cc}\mathrm{EROI}\left({y}_{0}\right),\hfill & \phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\mathrm{for}\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}y{y}_{D}\hfill \\ \mathrm{EROI}\left({y}_{0}\right)-{e}^{\frac{y-{y}_{D}}{{\tau}_{II}}},\hfill & \phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\mathrm{for}\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}y\u2a7e{y}_{D}\hfill \end{array}$ |

DF8 | Linear bump | $\mathrm{EROI}\left(y\right)=\left(\right)open="\{"\; close="\}">\begin{array}{cc}\mathrm{EROI}\left({y}_{0}\right),\hfill & \phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\mathrm{for}\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}y{y}_{D}\hfill \\ \mathrm{EROI}\left({y}_{0}\right)+{\delta}_{I}\times (y-{y}_{D}),\hfill & \phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\mathrm{for}\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}{y}_{D}\u2a7dy{y}_{B}\hfill \\ \mathrm{EROI}\left({y}_{0}\right)-{\delta}_{I}\times (y-{y}_{D}),\hfill & \phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\mathrm{for}\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}y\u2a7e{y}_{B}\hfill \end{array}$ |

DF9 | Linear bump | $\mathrm{EROI}\left(y\right)=\left(\right)open="\{"\; close="\}">\begin{array}{cc}\mathrm{EROI}\left({y}_{0}\right),\hfill & \phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\mathrm{for}\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}y{y}_{D}\hfill \\ \mathrm{EROI}\left({y}_{0}\right)+{\delta}_{II}\times (y-{y}_{D}),\hfill & \phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\mathrm{for}\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}{y}_{D}\u2a7dy{y}_{B}\hfill \\ \mathrm{EROI}\left({y}_{0}\right)-{\delta}_{II}\times (y-{y}_{D}),\hfill & \phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\mathrm{for}\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}y\u2a7e{y}_{B}\hfill \end{array}$ |

DF10 | Geometric bump | $\mathrm{EROI}\left(y\right)=\left(\right)open="\{"\; close="\}">\begin{array}{cc}\mathrm{EROI}\left({y}_{0}\right),\hfill & \phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\mathrm{for}\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}y{y}_{D}\hfill \\ (1-{\gamma}_{I})\times \mathrm{EROI}(y-1),\hfill & \phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\mathrm{for}\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}{y}_{D}\u2a7dy{y}_{B}\hfill \\ {\gamma}_{I}\times \mathrm{EROI}(y-1),\hfill & \phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\mathrm{for}\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}y\u2a7e{y}_{B}\hfill \end{array}$ |

DF11 | Geometric bump | $\mathrm{EROI}\left(y\right)=\left(\right)open="\{"\; close="\}">\begin{array}{cc}\mathrm{EROI}\left({y}_{0}\right),\hfill & \phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\mathrm{for}\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}y{y}_{D}\hfill \\ (1-{\gamma}_{II})\times \mathrm{EROI}(y-1),\hfill & \phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\mathrm{for}\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}{y}_{D}\u2a7dy{y}_{B}\hfill \\ {\gamma}_{II}\times \mathrm{EROI}(y-1),\hfill & \phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\mathrm{for}\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}y\u2a7e{y}_{B}\hfill \end{array}$ |

DF12 | Exponential bump | $\mathrm{EROI}\left(y\right)=\left(\right)open="\{"\; close="\}">\begin{array}{cc}\mathrm{EROI}\left({y}_{0}\right),\hfill & \phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\mathrm{for}\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}y{y}_{D}\hfill \\ \mathrm{EROI}\left({y}_{0}\right)+{e}^{\frac{y-{y}_{D}}{{\tau}_{I}}},\hfill & \phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\mathrm{for}\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}{y}_{D}\u2a7dy{y}_{B}\hfill \\ \mathrm{EROI}\left({y}_{0}\right)-{e}^{\frac{y-{y}_{D}}{{\tau}_{I}}},\hfill & \phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\mathrm{for}\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}y\u2a7e{y}_{B}\hfill \end{array}$ |

DF13 | Exponential bump | $\mathrm{EROI}\left(y\right)=\left(\right)open="\{"\; close="\}">\begin{array}{cc}\mathrm{EROI}\left({y}_{0}\right),\hfill & \phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\mathrm{for}\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}y{y}_{D}\hfill \\ \mathrm{EROI}\left({y}_{0}\right)+{e}^{\frac{y-{y}_{D}}{{\tau}_{II}}},\hfill & \phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\mathrm{for}\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}{y}_{D}\u2a7dy{y}_{B}\hfill \\ \mathrm{EROI}\left({y}_{0}\right)-{e}^{\frac{y-{y}_{D}}{{\tau}_{II}}},\hfill & \phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\mathrm{for}\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}y\u2a7e{y}_{B}\hfill \end{array}$ |

Output Assessed | High | Medium | Low |
---|---|---|---|

Peak year | 2038 | 2037 | 2036 |

Peak magnitude | 226.4 | 214.7 | 189.5 |

Decrease/increase ratio | 0.8 | 0.9 | 1.2 |

Output Assessed | Constant | Constant, Decrease | Constant, Bump |
---|---|---|---|

Peak year | 2037 | 2037 | 2037 |

Peak magnitude | 211.8 | 210.0 | 211.5 |

Decrease/increase ratio | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.9 |

Output Assessed | Gross Energy | Net-Energy | $\left(\right)open="|"\; close="|">\frac{{\mathbf{x}}_{\mathbf{gross}}-{\mathbf{x}}_{\mathbf{net},\mathbf{avg}}}{{\mathit{\sigma}}_{\mathbf{net}}}$ | Scale |
---|---|---|---|---|

Peak year | 2040 | 2037 | 3.6 | ++ |

Peak magnitude | 249 | 211 | 2.5 | ++ |

Pre-peak increase | 4.3 | 3.4 | 1.8 | + |

Post-peak decrease | 2.6 | 3.1 | 2.5 | ++ |

Decrease/increase ratio | 0.6 | 0.9 | 1.8 | + |

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |

© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Delannoy, L.; Longaretti, P.-Y.; Murphy, D.J.; Prados, E.
Assessing Global Long-Term EROI of Gas: A Net-Energy Perspective on the Energy Transition. *Energies* **2021**, *14*, 5112.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en14165112

**AMA Style**

Delannoy L, Longaretti P-Y, Murphy DJ, Prados E.
Assessing Global Long-Term EROI of Gas: A Net-Energy Perspective on the Energy Transition. *Energies*. 2021; 14(16):5112.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en14165112

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Delannoy, Louis, Pierre-Yves Longaretti, David. J. Murphy, and Emmanuel Prados.
2021. "Assessing Global Long-Term EROI of Gas: A Net-Energy Perspective on the Energy Transition" *Energies* 14, no. 16: 5112.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en14165112