Next Article in Journal
Nature-Inspired Algorithm Implemented for Stable Radial Basis Function Neural Controller of Electric Drive with Induction Motor
Previous Article in Journal
Processing of Water Treatment Sludge by Bioleaching
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Influence of Nanoparticles’ Conductivity and Charging on Dielectric Properties of Ester Oil Based Nanofluid

by
Konstantinos N. Koutras
1,*,
Ioannis A. Naxakis
1,
Eleftheria C. Pyrgioti
1,*,
Vasilios P. Charalampakos
2,
Ioannis F. Gonos
3,
Aspasia E. Antonelou
4 and
Spyros N. Yannopoulos
4
1
High Voltage Laboratory, Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Patras, 26500 Patras, Greece
2
Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of the Peloponnese, 26334 Patras, Greece
3
School of Electrical & Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 15780 Athens, Greece
4
Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas, Institute of Chemical Engineering Sciences, 26504 Patras, Greece
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2020, 13(24), 6540; https://doi.org/10.3390/en13246540
Submission received: 13 November 2020 / Revised: 4 December 2020 / Accepted: 9 December 2020 / Published: 11 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Topic Applications of Nanomaterials in Energy Systems)

Abstract

:
This study addresses the effect of nanoparticles’ conductivity and surface charge on the dielectric performance of insulating nanofluids. Dispersions of alumina and silicon carbide nanoparticles of similar size (~50 nm) and concentration (0.004% w/w) were prepared in natural ester oil. The stability of the dispersions was explored by dynamic light scattering. AC, positive and negative lightning impulse breakdown voltage, as well as partial discharge inception voltage of the nanofluid samples were measured and compared with the respective properties of the base oil. The obtained results indicate that the addition of SiC nanoparticles can lead to an increase in AC breakdown voltage and also enhance the resistance of the liquid to the appearance of partial discharge. On the other hand, the induction of positive charge from the Al2O3 nanoparticles could be the main factor leading to an improved positive Lightning Impulse Breakdown Voltage and worse performance at negative polarity.

1. Introduction

The lifetime of the power transformer is a major factor for the reliability and uninterrupted operation of the electricity grid. Liquid insulation, as well as the paper immersed in dielectric liquid, should provide protection of its windings under the influence of electrical, thermal, and even environmental effects to prevent short circuits and leakage currents [1,2]. The mineral oil typically used as dielectric and thermal coolant has certain disadvantages, such as toxicity, high flammability, and reduced lifetime [3,4,5,6,7]. Therefore, the first step towards the improvement of transformer insulation is to turn the attention of research to the study of alternatives, such as natural or synthetic ester oils [7,8,9,10]. The use of ester oils entails, beyond improved properties like biodegradability and higher moisture tolerance, benefits for the transformer itself, essentially aging characteristics, enhanced lifetime, and loading capability [3,11,12].
Nanotechnology has already been used for various subsurface applications [13,14,15,16]. In liquid insulation, the integration of nanoparticles (NPs) in a base conventional oil volume has been part of recent research in an effort to achieve enhanced dielectric and thermal performance with optimum insulation quantity to recede the size of the transformer [17]. The term “nanofluid” (NF) was firstly proposed by Choi et al. [18], indicating a mixture where both the NPs and the base oil contribute to the application providing enhanced thermal conductivity. Since then, a number of reports have appeared in the literature regarding the integration of many different types of NPs in mineral or ester oils achieving improvement not only in thermal but also in dielectric properties based on their type, concentrations, shapes, and sizes [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,19,20,21,22].
It has been noticed that the addition of nitrides mainly leads to improvement of thermal properties [20,21], while Thomas et al. [3] indicated that the integration of CaCu3Ti4O12 NPs in 0.050% vol. concentration could lead to thermal conductivity enhancement of the synthetic ester oil by 10% at room temperature. The integration of metal oxides, on the other hand, could have beneficial effect on dielectric ones. Towards this direction, Zhong et al. [8] and Du et al. [2,22] have reported improvement of AC and Lightning Impulse Breakdown characteristics following the addition of semi-conductive NPs in natural ester and mineral oil volumes, respectively. The addition of magnetic [4,23] and dielectric [19,23,24] NPs, even at low weight fractions, has also shown increase in the dielectric strength with respect to the base oil. Khaled et al. [23] studied the effect of conductive Fe3O4, and dielectric Al2O3 and SiO2 NPs on AC breakdown voltage (AC BDV) of synthetic ester oil reporting 48% improvement with the addition of conductive Fe3O4 NPs (50 nm) at a concentration of 0.4 g/L, while the integration of insulating Al2O3 NPs of 13 nm size at a concentration of 0.05 g/L led to a 35% improvement. Last but not least, the viscosity of the oil is also affected based on the type and the loading of the NPs inside the matrix. Fontes et al. [25] reported a 25% rise in viscosity adding diamond NPs in transformer oil at 0.050 vol.%. Ilyas et al. [26] concluded that the dynamic viscosity of the mineral oil-based alumina NFs had decreased with the rise of temperature.
With regard to the mechanisms leading to the beneficial effects of the NPs on the aforementioned properties, a number of theories have been proposed [27,28,29]. Most of them consider the operation of NPs as “electron traps” under the application of an external electric field hindering the streamer propagation between the electrodes, adopting different explanations [27,28]. Conductive NPs can capture the fast electrons in shallow traps through charge induction [27,28]. Semi-conductive and dielectric NPs could have the same effect as the conductive ones, because they are polarized under the influence of an external electric field.
Despite the number of publications devoted to the study of the metal oxide NPs’ effect on dielectric and thermal properties of the transformer oil, there is limited literature concerning the influence of metal carbides in transformer oils, although they are widely used in other industrial sectors. The main contribution of this article is to compare the dielectric performance of insulating Al2O3 and semi-conducting SiC-ester based NFs in terms of AC breakdown voltage (AC BDV), positive and negative Lightning Impulse breakdown voltage (LI BDV) and partial discharge (PD) activity. The choice of these specific types of NPs, having similar nominal size, is based on the fact that they have similar permittivities, therefore conductivity should play a major role in the dielectric performance of the corresponding NFs.
In this study, insulating alumina and semi-conducting SiC NPs were dispersed into natural ester oil EnvirotempTM FR3TM in concentration of 0.004% w/w. The choice of this particular concentration is based on previous work [30]. After the preparation of the NF samples, dynamic light scattering was used to assess their agglomeration behavior in the dispersions. AC, positive and negative LI BDV, as well as PDIV, have been measured, analyzed, and compared to the base oil’s characteristics in an effort to conclude about their effect on dielectric performance of transformer oil. The results of the conducted measurements have indicated that the NF-containing SiC NPs possesses improved dielectric properties which is attributed to the higher conductivity of these NPs with respect to the Al2O3 NPs for the same nominal size and weight percentages.

2. Materials and Methods

This section includes the steps followed for the preparation of NF dispersions and the experiments undertaken for the study the stability and the conduction of measurements of dielectric properties.
EnvirotempTM FR3TM, purchased by Cargill, was used as matrix. It is a renewable, bio-based natural ester dielectric coolant, which is formulated from seed oils and performance enhancing additives with a density of 0.92 g∙cm−3 at 20 °C, relative permittivity 3.2, conductivity 5 × 10−14 S∙m−1, and flash and fire points greater than 250 and 300 °C, respectively. The commercially obtained dielectric alumina and semi-conducting SiC NPs were used as received without any further treatment. These NPs were selected considering their similar nominal size and permittivities. Some of the most important dielectric and thermal properties of the NPs are presented in Table 1.

2.1. Preparation of Nanofluid Samples

A two-step method was implemented for the production of NF samples. Primarily, a volume of 500 mL of FR3TM was picked as base oil for the formation of NFs. Each matrix sample was filtered and dried in hot air oven at 120 °C overnight in order to achieve moisture reduction within the prescribed limits. The level of moisture within each sample after drying was confirmed with Karl Fischer titration method, following the procedure reported elsewhere [31]. In brief, Mitsubishi Chemicals Co. CA-100 moisture meter and Metrohm KF Coulometer 831 measured and confirmed, respectively, that the remaining moisture was below the recommended values.
Subsequently, 18.4 mg of the two types of NPs under study were immersed in appropriate base oil volumes to achieve the desired w/w concentration. As NPs have high surface areas [1,32,33] they tend to agglomerate shortly after their addition in the matrix forming clusters, where primary particles are held together by van der Waals interaction forces [32,33].
In order to avoid the agglomeration of NPs, which diminishes their beneficial effects on dielectric strength [1,7,32,33], each mixture was subjected to ultrasonication and vigorous magnetic stirring to achieve good dispersion of the NPs and homogenization of the final NF samples. In fact, each sample was sonicated for 30 min with the assistance of a Raypa UCI-50 ultrasonic bath, followed by a 15 min stirring with the use of a Biosan MSH-300 magnetic stirrer. The maximum input power of the sonicator is about 300 W with a frequency of 35 kHz. Each NF sample was subjected to ultrasonication under full power and the amount of ultrasonication energy was in the range of 540 kJ. This cycle was repeated three times for both NF samples, ensuring uniform dispersion of the colloidal suspensions, as indicated in [7]. Table 2 depicts the labeling of the NF samples, as well as the base oil, which will be submitted in the same experiments as well, while images of the two NF samples are shown in Figure 1 immediately after their preparation.

2.2. Experimental Part

There are two major categories, according to which the dielectric measurements regarding any High Voltage (HV) equipment are classified: the destructive and non-destructive tests. In the context of the destructive tests, AC, positive and negative LI BDV are measured for the two NF samples along with a base oil sample. In regard to the non-destructive ones, PDIV, as well as the variation of the apparent charge for various voltage levels, have been measured.
AC BDV is the fundamental parameter for the characterization of any insulation system, as long the transformer nominally operates under AC voltage. For the determination of this property, each one of the samples under investigation is stressed under AC voltage/60 Hz using a Baur DTA 100 C generator, as illustrated in Figure 2a, according to the conditions of IEC 60,156 standard. The generator can produce up to 100 kV increasing the voltage at a rate of 2 kV/s until breakdown occurs between two Rogowski electrodes, which ensure a uniform electric field distribution, with the gap distance set at 2.5 mm. At the beginning of the experimental procedure, the electrodes are polished and cleaned. 10 sets of 6 breakdown events (60 in total) are performed, with the applied interval being 2 min between two successive breakdowns and 5 min between two sets. The results are fit to Weibull and normal distributions in order the AC BDV in low probability levels to be estimated [7,23,34].
Regarding the measurement of LI BDV, this is another property of major importance as it is an indication for the strength of the insulation in emergency conditions, such as lightning strikes. A two-stage impulse generator is used, producing up to 400 kV, with positive and negative polarity, according to IEC 60,897 standard. A point–sphere geometry is used, ensuring a highly divergent field geometry, with the gap distance set at 25 mm. The radius of curvature is 50 μm, while the diameter of the sphere is 12.7 mm. Five voltage applications are conducted for each voltage level with each sample being replaced with a new one after every BD event, ensuring a good reliability for the processing of the results. The applied lightning impulse voltage 1.2/50 μs, is monitored on oscilloscope Tektronix DPO4104; 1 GHz/5 GS s-1.
In terms of the conduction of PD measurements, a HV test transformer (HIGH VOLT GmbH Transformer PEOI 40/100,100 kV) is used with a TETTEX Instruments PD Detector DDX-9101 to measure the apparent charge to a nominal capacitor (HIPOTRONICS capacitor PSF 100-1). The schematic diagram of the configuration is displayed in Figure 2b. The test cell consists of two plate electrodes with the gap between them set at 0.75 mm. Nomex® Dupont™ insulating paper with 0.75 mm thickness impregnated to the NFs and base oil samples, is put in the gap. The AC voltage value for which the measured apparent charge exceeds the value of 10 pC is considered as the PDIV for each sample under investigation. The insulating papers impregnated to iNF, sNF, and base oil samples are stressed under AC voltage while the transformer is increasing the voltage at a rate of 0.1 kV/s until the measured apparent charge exceeds the threshold value. Each experiment is repeated 4 times for ensuring the reliability of the obtained results.

3. Results

3.1. Particle Size and Agglomeration Dynamics in Dispersions

Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) was used to study the particle size and particle size distribution of the dry powders. The NPs were drop-casted by ethanol dispersion onto Si substrates. Figure 3 illustrates typical images of the Al2O3 Figure 3a and SiC particles Figure 3b at high magnifications. For both samples, the particles seem agglomerated, as it typically occurs when particles are drop casted from a dispersion to the substrate. The images reveal that the particles sizes have the nominal values, being, in particular, ~45–50 nm in the case of SiC and in the range 30–35 for Al2O3. For both materials, image analysis over broader areas by FE-SEM, incorporating a larger number of primary particles, show very narrow particle size distributions.
The dynamics of NPs in dispersion are of paramount importance since their agglomeration rate essentially determines the high-performance lifetime of the NF. DLS is a versatile technique able to provide the rate of agglomeration process in situ. Apart from the primary particle size, the technique can sensitively furnish information on the formation of small agglomerates ad their evolution upon aging. Details about the method and data analysis applied to a similar system, namely, a TiO2-based NF, have been presented elsewhere [7]. Figure 4 shows the hydrodynamic radii of the two NFs measured at two different times, immediately after their dispersion preparation and after 5 days. The Rh data reveal that for each NF there are two different population of particles. One population with Rh around 40 nm is related to the dynamics of the primary NPs, while agglomerates with Rh of few hundreds of nm also exist in the dispersions.
The evolution of Rh against time show that a weak agglomeration, in relation to TiO2-based oil dispersion [7] takes place. Both the primary particles (nano) and their agglomerates (aggl) exhibit an increase in size following similar rates among the two types of NPs. These findings demonstrate that the proclivity toward agglomeration of SiC and Al2O3 is rather weak, e.g., compared to TiO2 NFs. This finding lends support to the accuracy of the electrical characterization, considering that possible fast agglomeration process may affect the accurate monitoring of electrical parameters.

3.2. AC Breakdown Voltage

According to the mean AC BDVs displayed in Figure 5 and Table 3, iNF and sNF samples present enhanced dielectric strength by 4.1% and 16.3%, respectively. The standard deviation of the collected AC BDV events is approximately the same for the iNF with respect to that of the base oil. On the contrary, the standard deviation of the results regarding sNF is increased.
The estimation of the BDV in low probability levels is of major importance as well. The BDV can be considered as a random variable that follows normal or/and Weibull distribution [7,33,34,35,36]. The cumulated distribution functions (CDF) of the normal and Weibull random variable x, expressing the breakdown voltage, are given by (1) and (2), respectively:
F ( x ) =   1 2 [ 1 + e r f ( x μ σ 2 ) ]
F ( x ) = 1   e x β α
where, μ is the mean value; σ is the standard deviation; α is the shape parameter and β is the scale parameter.
Firstly, Anderson–Darling goodness of fit test is performed to determine whether the sample of the BD events are normally distributed. The same procedure is followed for Weibull distribution too, because it is expected to give more precise analysis as it does not make assumptions of the skewness and kurtosis. At 5% significance level, the p-value is higher for all the samples under investigation both for normal and Weibull distribution, as shown in Table 4.
Figure 4 depicts the frequency density plot of the BD events along with adjustment to normal distribution per each sample under investigation. Such a display is necessary for the detection of possible anomalies in the distribution of the AC BDV [7,23,34]. From the plots of Figure 6, along with the goodness of fit test results; it is concluded that none of them could be rejected for the following statistical analysis.
The breakdown voltages at 1, 10, and 50% probability levels of base, iNF and sNF (Table 5) were calculated from the probability density plots for both distributions, which are demonstrated in Figure 7. The choice of these probability levels corresponds to their importance for the operation of the transformer. On the one hand, U50% gives an assessment for the expected breakdown voltage, while on the other hand, U10% represents an indication on the initiation threshold of ionization, and therefore assists in concluding about the reliability of the transformer oil sample [7,23,32,33,34,35]. Last but not least, the BDV at 1% cumulative probability is necessary information for the designing of electric equipment. U1% corresponds to the limit of voltage for safety and continuous operation of the appliance [37].
Based on the results of Table 5, both iNF and sNF demonstrate enhanced BDVs in low cumulative probability levels, with sNF showing the highest improvement with respect to the natural ester oil sample by around 16.2, 15.6, and 13.7% for U50%, U10%, and U1%, respectively.
From the U10% and U1% BD probability results, it is evident that the addition of SiC NPs could assure more reliable nominal operation of the transformer and delay the initiation of streamer propagation [23,35,37].

3.3. Positive and Negative Lightning Impulse Breakdown Voltage

The up-and-down method was implemented in order to estimate the mean LI BDV under positive and negative polarity of base oil and the two NF samples after conducting measurements in various voltage levels according to the demands of IEC 60,897 standard. The mean LI BDVs as well as the average times to breakdown are exhibited in Table 6. Figure 8 and Figure 9 depict the oscillograms of the LI BDVs at 50% breakdown probability under positive and negative polarity, respectively.
The LI strength of iNF under positive polarity is enhanced by 28.5% with respect to the base oil with the corresponding improvement of sNF being limited at 6%. The mean BD times of the samples after the application of positive LIV are almost steady, unlike with the corresponding ones under negative polarity. Under the application of negative LIV, the time to BD of iNF is restricted by 29.5% with respect to the one of the base oil, while sNF sample demonstrates almost the same BD time. In terms of their behavior under negative LIV, both NF samples show limited increase, as displayed in Table 6 and Figure 8. It is also evident that the addition of alumina NPs narrows the gap between positive and negative LI BDV.

3.4. Partial Discharge

In Figure 10, the change in apparent charge is depicted versus the applied AC voltage, while the PDIV and the value of apparent charge at the PDIV for each sample are presented in Table 7. It is evident that all the samples in question have similar behavior until about the level of 3 kV. Above this voltage level, only the paper impregnated to sNF demonstrates a stable resistance to PD activity for the whole range of AC stress, with the accumulation of apparent charge at the level of 5.5 kV (highest applied voltage) being improved by 97.5 and 95.8% in comparison to the corresponding one of the paper impregnated to base oil and iNF, respectively. Papers impregnated to sNF and iNF samples demonstrate improved resistance to PD appearance by 92 and 44% with respect to the paper impregnated to the matrix.
Figure 11 depicts the PD pulses related to the papers impregnated to sNF (Figure 11a) and iNF (Figure 11b) at the highest applied voltage. In the case of iNF impregnated insulating paper, the multiple pulses of irregular form indicate the presence of voids in the vicinity of the NF.

4. Discussion

Taking into account the U50% values from Table 5 according to Weibull distribution, the mean AC dielectric strength for a gap of 2.5 mm is 24.9 kV∙mm−1, 25.9 kV∙mm−1, and 28.9 kV∙mm−1 for base, iNF, and sNF samples, respectively. This finding could be attributed to the fact that the addition of semi-conducting SiC NPs for the selected weight fraction can lead to the delay of streamer propagation, by trapping and de-trapping the fast electrons at the tip of the streamer in shallow traps [27,28,32,38].
In an effort to explain the effect of the two types of NPs on BDV of the oil, Sima et al. [28] proposed a theory according to which the addition of NPs in the matrix results in change of the main electrodynamics in the dielectric liquid, regardless of their electrical properties. If considerable divergence exists in conductivity or permittivity between NP and base oil, then induced or polarized charges are generated at the interface between NP and matrix. These charges result in the production of a potential well that can trap the fast electrons at the tip of the streamer in shallow traps and slow down its propagation. As for the SiC NPs, they are characterized by much higher conductivity than that ofthe base oil, and due to their characterization as semi-conductors, charge induction involves also positive holes apart from electrons. These redistributed charges on the surface of SiC NPs produce a potential well, which is given by the formula [28] for the electric field direction (θ = 0) and the opposite one (θ = π):
φ S i C = { σ 2 σ 1 2 σ 1 + σ 2 R 3 E 0 1 r 2 ,   θ = 0 ,   r R σ 2 σ 1 2 σ 1 + σ 2 R 3 E 0 1 r 2 ,   θ = π ,   r R
where σ1, σ2 are the conductivities of matrix and NPs in S∙m−1, respectively, R is the radius of NP in m, E0 is the mean dielectric strength of the NF in V∙m−1 and r is the distance from the NP’s surface in m.
On the other hand, surface charges, known as bound charges, are formed at the surface of dielectric alumina NPs, due to polarization under the influence of an external electric field E0. This mechanism incorporates displacement and turning-direction polarizations. The displacement polarizations are generated very quickly in only 10−15 to 10−12 s, while turning-direction polarizations in time ranging from 10−10 s to 10−2 s [28]. Therefore, they can also produce a potential well, which is given by:
φ A l 2 O 3 = { ε 2 ε 1 2 ε 1 + ε 2 R 3 E 0 1 r 2 ,   θ = 0 ,   r R ε 2 ε 1 2 ε 1 + ε 2 R 3 E 0 1 r 2 ,   θ = π ,   r R
where ε1, ε2 are the permittivities of matrix and NPs in F∙m−1, respectively.
The potential well on each occasion is able to catch the fast-moving electrons and transform them into negatively charged NPs which are moving slowly due to their larger radius. This could lead to the delay of streamer propagation and thus higher required voltage level to bridge the gap.
Substituting the values of conductivity and permittivity of FR3TM, SiC and Al2O3 NPs, as well as the corresponding values of mean dielectric strength and radius of NPs in Equations (3) and (4), the potential well of the colloidal suspensions of SiC and Al2O3 is given as:
φ S i C   ( r ) = 3.61 × 10 15 × 1 r 2   [ V ]
φ A l 2 O 3   ( r ) = 1.32 × 10 15 × 1 r 2   [ V ]
Figure 12 demonstrates the higher potential well of the suspended SiC NPs in the oil, especially while moving closer to their surface. These types of NPs have the ability to capture more free electrons in shallow traps than the alumina NPs. This fact explains their increased dielectric performance. The total amount of charge that can be trapped by each of these two types of NPs is expressed by (7) and (8), respectively:
Q S i C =   12 π ε 1 Ε 0 R 2
Q A l 2 O 3 =   12 π ε 1 Ε 0 R 2 ε 2 2 ε 1 + ε 2  
Additionally, with substitution of the corresponding values as indicated above, they give:
Q S i C =   7.71 ×   10 17   C
Q A l 2 O 3 =   4.18 ×   10 17     C
This means that each SiC and Al2O3 NP could potentially capture approximately 482 and 300 electrons, respectively, until they are saturated. The higher amount of trapped charge carriers in sNF is ought to the higher conductivity of SiC NPs and is a result of the mechanism described above. Streamers propagate in different modes, which are characterized by increasing velocity. Atiya et al. [32] indicated that the operation of NPs as electron traps hinders the first two slow modes, which are applicable under AC voltage.
Unlike AC, higher streamer propagation velocities are applicable under Lightning Impulse Voltage (LIV). Ionization of the oil molecules begins above a threshold value of electric field which includes positive ions and electrons. During positive LIV, the space charge field created by the positive ions increases towards the grounded sphere, facilitating the propagation of positive streamers. Under negative polarity, the electric field towards the grounded sphere is weakened by the space charge field, hindering the propagation of negative streamers. This explains why negative LI BDV is higher than the positive LI BDV. Both types of NFs demonstrate increased strength under positive and negative LIV, which indicates that the trapping of high mobility electrons at the tip of the streamer in shallow traps results in increased BD performance [2,7,39]. However, the better performance of iNF during positive LIV and its worse performance during negative LIV with respect to sNF could be attributed to the distribution of the space charge field [39,40]. The positive charges induced by the Al2O3 NPs can trap the fast electrons at the tip of the streamer, inhibiting its initiation and propagation towards the grounded sphere electrode. On the other hand, under negative polarity, the addition of Al2O3 NPs increases the electric field towards the grounded sphere, accelerating the propagation of negative streamers.
The improved resistance to PD activity of both NF samples, with respect to the base oil, can be attributed to the formation of the electrical double layer (EDL) between the surface of the NP and the oil [3,7,32]. The addition of these types of NPs can augment the interfacial EDL, which can capture the charge carriers and delay the initiation of PD activity. The better performance of sNF can be interpreted by the greater ability of SiC NPs to trap the charge carriers, foremost the high mobility electrons, and delay the appearance of PD in the vicinity of the liquid, as it was explained above.

5. Conclusions

In summary, two NF samples, containing Al2O3 (iNF) and SiC (sNF) NPs in the same concentration (0.004% w/w), were synthesized and characterized. Electron microscopy showed that primary particles have a narrow particle size distribution. DLS has revealed rather good stability of the dispersion towards agglomeration over a period of five days. Both dispersions exhibit similar agglomeration behavior. AC, positive and negative LI BDV, and PD activity of the NF samples were measured and compared to the corresponding dielectric properties of a pure base oil sample. AC BDV results indicated that sNF demonstrates the highest improvement in terms of dielectric strength by 16.3%. The statistical analysis also showed that the same sample demonstrates increased AC BDV by 15.6 and 13.7% at 10 and 1% probability levels, providing an indication of enhanced reliability for the uninterrupted operation of the power transformer. These findings have been attributed to the greater ability of SiC NPs to trap charge carriers in shallow traps, because of their higher conductivity.
On the other hand, the increase in positive LI BDV of iNF can be attributed to the positive charge induced by alumina NPs, which results in delaying the streamer propagation from the positive point. Finally, sNF impregnated paper also demonstrates the greatest resistance to the appearance of PD, delaying its initiation by 92% with respect to the paper impregnated to matrix. This finding could be attributed to the role of charge carriers’ trapping from the augmented interfacial zone between SiC NPs and matrix. Our future research work includes an attempt to find an appropriate surface modification technique in order to achieve long-term stability of the Al2O3 and SiC dispersions, which will be followed by the conduction of measurements of dielectric and thermal properties to address the effect of surface modification on them.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.N.K., I.A.N., E.C.P. and V.P.C.; methodology, K.N.K., I.A.N. and A.E.A.; validation, E.C.P., I.F.G. and S.N.Y.; formal analysis, K.N.K. and I.A.N.; investigation, K.N.K., I.A.N., E.C.P. and V.P.C.; resources, E.C.P.; data curation, I.F.G., A.E.A. and S.N.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, K.N.K. and V.P.C.; writing—review and editing, I.F.G. and S.N.Y.; supervision, E.C.P. and S.N.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

Authors want to express their gratitude to Christina Polyzou of the Laboratory of Physical, Inorganic and Nuclear Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of Patras for the assistance in the synthesis of the NF samples.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hussain, M.R.; Khan, Q.; Khan, A.A.; Refaat, S.S.; Abu-Rub, H. Dielectric Performance of Magneto-Nanofluids for Advancing Oil-Immersed Power Transformer. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 163316–163328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Du, Y.; Lv, Y.; Li, C.; Chen, M.; Zhong, Y.; Zhou, J.; Li, X.; Zhou, Y. Effect of semiconductive nanoparticles on insulating performances of transformer oil. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2012, 19, 770–776. [Google Scholar]
  3. Thomas, P.; Hudedmani, N.; Prasath, R.T.A.R.; Roy, N.K.; Mahato, S.N. Synthetic Ester Oil Based High Permittivity CaCu3Ti4O12 (CCTO) Nanofluids an Alternative Insulating Medium for Power Transformer. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2019, 26, 314–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Peppas, G.D.; Charalampakos, V.P.; Pyrgioti, E.C.; Gonos, I.F. Electrical and optical measurements investigation of the pre-breakdown processes in natural ester oil under different impulse voltage waveforms. IET Sci. Meas. Technol. 2016, 10, 545–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Farade, R.A.; Wahab, N.I.A.; Mansour, D.A.; Azis, N.B.; Jasni, J.; Soudagar, M.E.M.; Siddappa, V. Development of Graphene Oxide-Based Nonedible Cottonseed Nanofluids for Power Transformers. Materials 2020, 13, 2569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Katiyar, A.; Dhar, P.; Nandi, T.; Maganti, L.S.; Das, S.K. Enhanced Breakdown Performance of Anatase and Rutile Titania based Nanooils. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2016, 23, 3494–3503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Koutras, K.N.; Naxakis, I.A.; Antonelou, A.E.; Charalampakos, V.P.; Pyrgioti, E.C.; Yannopoulos, S.N. Dielectric strength and stability of natural ester oil based TiO2 nanofluids. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 316, 113901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhong, Y.; Lv, Y.; Li, C.; Du, Y.; Chen, M.; Zhang, S.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, L. Insulating properties and charge characteristics of natural ester fluid modified by TiO2 semiconductive nanoparticles. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2013, 20, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Charalampakos, V.P.; Peppas, G.D.; Pyrgioti, E.C.; Bakandritsos, A.; Polykrati, A.D.; Gonos, I.F. Dielectric Insulation Characteristics of Natural Ester Fluid Modified by Colloidal Iron Oxide Ions and Silica Nanoparticles. Energies 2019, 12, 3259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. McShane, C. New safety dielectric coolants for distribution and power transformers. IEEE Ind. Appl. Mag. 2000, 6, 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Salama, M.M.M.; Mansour, D.A.; Daghrah, M.; Abdelkasouda, S.M.; Abbasa, A.A. Thermal performance of transformers filled with environmentally friendly oils under various loading conditions. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2020, 118, 105743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Daghrah, M.; Wang, Z.; Liu, Q.; Hilker, A.; Gyore, A. Experimental study of the influence of different liquids on the transformer cooling performance. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2019, 34, 588–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Ali, M.; Sahito, M.F.; Jha, N.K.; Arain, Z.U.A.; Memon, S.; Keshavarz, A.; Iglauer, S.; Saeedi, A.; Sarmadivaleh, M. Effect of nanofluid on CO2-wettability reversal of sandstone formation; implications for CO2 geo-storage. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020, 559, 304–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Jha, N.K.; Lebedev, M.; Iglauer, S.; Ali, M.; Roshan, H.; Barifcani, A.; Sangwai, J.S.; Sarmadivaleh, M. Pore scale investigation of low salinity surfactant nanofluid injection into oil saturated sandstone via X-ray micro-tomography. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020, 562, 370–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Al-Anssari, S.; Arain, Z.U.A.; Shanshool, H.A.; Ali, M.; Keshavarz, A.; Iglauer, S.; Sarmadivaleh, M. Effect of Nanoparticles on the Interfacial Tension of CO2-Oil System at High Pressure and Temperature: An Experimental Approach. In Proceedings of the SPE Asia Pacific Oil & Gas Conference and Exhibition, Bali, Indonesia, 12–14 October 2020. [Google Scholar]
  16. Aftab, A.; Ali, M.; Arif, M.; Panhwar, S.; Saady, N.M.C.; Al-Khdheeawi, E.A.; Mahmoud, O.; Ismail, A.R.; Kesharvaz, A.; Iglauer, S. Influence of tailor-made TiO2/API bentonite nanocomposite on drilling mud performance: Towards enhanced drilling operations. Appl. Clay Sci. 2020, 199, 105862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rafiq, M.; Shafique, M.; Azam, A.; Ateeq, M. Transformer oil-based nanofluid: The application of nanomaterials on thermal, electrical and physicochemical properties of liquid insulation—A review. Ain Shams Eng. J. 2020. in Press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Choi, S.U.S.; Eastman, J.A. Enhancing Thermal Conductivity of Fluids with Nanoparticles. In Proceedings of the 1995 International Mechanical Engineering Congress Exposition, San Francisco, CA, USA, 12–17 November 1995; pp. 99–105. [Google Scholar]
  19. Mohamad, N.A.; Azis, N.; Jasni, J.; Ab Kadir, M.Z.A.; Yunus, R.; Yaakub, Z. Impact of Fe3O4, CuO and Al2O3 on the AC Breakdown Voltage of Palm Oil and Coconut Oil in the Presence of CTAB. Energies 2019, 12, 1605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Wang, X.; Xu, X.; Choi, S.U.S. Thermal conductivity of nanoparticle-fluid mixture. J. Thermophys. Heat Transf. 1999, 13, 474–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Du, B.X.; Li, X.L.; Xiao, M. High Thermal Conductivity Transformer Oil Filled with BN Nanoparticles. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2015, 22, 851–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Du, Y.; Lv, Y.; Li, C.; Chen, M.; Zhou, J.; Li, X.; Zhou, Y.; Tu, Y. Effect of electron shallow trap on breakdown performance of transformer oil-based nanofluids. J. Appl. Phys. 2011, 110, 104104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Khaled, U.; Beroual, A. AC Dielectric Strength of Synthetic Ester Based Fe3O4, Al2O3 and SiO2 Nanofluids—Conformity with Normal and Weibull Distributions. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2019, 26, 625–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rafiq, M.; Chengrong, L.; Lv, Y. Effect of Al2O3 nanorods on dielectric strength of aged transformer oil/paper insulation system. J. Mol. Liq. 2019, 284, 700–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fontes, D.H.; Ribatski, G.; Filho, E.P.B. Experimental evaluation of thermal conductivity, viscosity and breakdown voltage AC of nanofluids of carbon nanotubes and diamond in transformer oil. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2015, 58, 115–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ilyas, S.U.; Pendyala, R.; Narahari, M.; Susin, L. Stability, rheology and thermal analysis of functionalized alumina- thermal oil-based nanofluids for advanced cooling systems. Energy Convers. Manag. 2017, 142, 215–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hwang, J.G.; Zahn, M.; O’Sullivan, F.M.; Pettersson, L.A.A.; Hjortstam, O.; Liu, R. Effects of nanoparticle charging on streamer development in transformer oil-based nanofluids. J. Appl. Phys. 2010, 107, 014310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Sima, W.; Shi, J.; Yang, Q.; Huang, S.; Cao, X. Effects of Conductivity and Permittivity of Nanoparticle on Transformer Oil Insulation Performance: Experiment and Theory. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2015, 22, 380–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Miao, J.; Dong, M.; Ren, M.; Wu, X.; Shen, L.; Wang, H. Effect of nanoparticle polarization on relative permittivity of transformer oil-based nanofluids. J. Appl. Phys. 2013, 113, 204103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Koutras, K.; Pyrgioti, E.; Naxakis, I.; Charalampakos, V.; Peppas, G. AC Breakdown Performance of A12O3 and SiC Natural Ester Based Nanofluids. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering and 2020 IEEE Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Europe (EEEIC/I&CPS Europe), Madrid, Spain, 9–12 June 2020; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  31. Peppas, G.D.; Charalampakos, V.P.; Pyrgioti, E.C.; Danikas, M.G.; Bakandritsos, A.; Gonos, I.F. Statistical investigation of AC breakdown voltage of nanofluids compared with mineral and natural ester oil. IET Sci. Meas. Technol. 2016, 10, 644–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Atiya, E.G.; Mansour, D.A.; Khattab, R.M. Dispersion behavior and breakdown strength of transformer oil filled with TiO2 nanoparticles. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2015, 22, 2463–2472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Pyrgioti, E.C.; Koutras, K.N.; Charalampakos, V.P.; Peppas, G.D.; Bakandritsos, A.P.; Naxakis, I.A. An experimental study on the influence of surface modification of TiO2 nanoparticles on breakdown voltage of natural ester nanofluid. Lect. Notes Electr. Eng. 2020, 599, 279–288. [Google Scholar]
  34. Martin, D.; Wang, Z.D. Statistical analysis of the AC breakdown voltages of ester based transformer oils. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2008, 15, 1044–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Khaled, U.; Beroual, A. AC dielectric strength of mineral oil-based Fe3O4 and Al2O3 nanofluids. Energies 2018, 11, 3505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Dang, V.-H.; Beroual, A.; Perrier, C. Comparative study of statistical breakdown in mineral, synthetic and natural ester oils under AC voltage. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2012, 19, 1508–1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Khaled, U.; Beroual, A. Statistical Investigation of AC Breakdown Voltage of Natural Ester with Electronic Scavenger Additives. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2019, 26, 2012–2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, J.; Zhang, Z.; Zou, P.; Grzybowski, S.; Zahn, M. Preparation of a vegetable oil-based nanofluid and investigation of its breakdown and dielectric properties. IEEE Electr. Insul. Mag. 2012, 28, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lv, Y.; Ge, Y.; Li, C.; Wang, Q.; Zhou, Y.; Qi, B.; Yi, K.; Chen, X.; Yuan, J. Effect of TiO2 Nanoparticles on Streamer Propagation in Transformer Oil under Lightning Impulse Voltage. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2016, 23, 2110–2115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Massala, G.; Lesaint, O. Positive streamer propagation in large oil gaps: Electrical properties of streamers. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 1998, 5, 371–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The NF samples shortly after their synthesis: sNF left; iNF right.
Figure 1. The NF samples shortly after their synthesis: sNF left; iNF right.
Energies 13 06540 g001
Figure 2. AC BDV and PD apparatuses: (a) BAUR DTA test cell with Rogowski electrodes. (b) Schematic diagram of the PD setup.
Figure 2. AC BDV and PD apparatuses: (a) BAUR DTA test cell with Rogowski electrodes. (b) Schematic diagram of the PD setup.
Energies 13 06540 g002
Figure 3. Representative FE-SME images of (a) Al2O3 and (b) SiC NPs at high magnification.
Figure 3. Representative FE-SME images of (a) Al2O3 and (b) SiC NPs at high magnification.
Energies 13 06540 g003
Figure 4. Hydrodynamic radii estimated by DLS data in dispersion, measured at short and long times after the dispersion preparation.
Figure 4. Hydrodynamic radii estimated by DLS data in dispersion, measured at short and long times after the dispersion preparation.
Energies 13 06540 g004
Figure 5. Mean AC BDVs and standard deviation of the NF and base oil samples.
Figure 5. Mean AC BDVs and standard deviation of the NF and base oil samples.
Energies 13 06540 g005
Figure 6. Frequency density plots of the breakdown events for each sample in question with conformity to Normal distribution.
Figure 6. Frequency density plots of the breakdown events for each sample in question with conformity to Normal distribution.
Energies 13 06540 g006
Figure 7. Probability density plots of the breakdown events for each sample in question according to Normal and Weibull distributions.
Figure 7. Probability density plots of the breakdown events for each sample in question according to Normal and Weibull distributions.
Energies 13 06540 g007
Figure 8. Oscillogram of the positive LI BDVs of the under-study samples at 50% breakdown probability level.
Figure 8. Oscillogram of the positive LI BDVs of the under-study samples at 50% breakdown probability level.
Energies 13 06540 g008
Figure 9. Oscillogram of the negative LI BDVs of the under-study samples at 50% breakdown probability level.
Figure 9. Oscillogram of the negative LI BDVs of the under-study samples at 50% breakdown probability level.
Energies 13 06540 g009
Figure 10. Change of the apparent charge as a function of the applied voltage for the three samples under investigation.
Figure 10. Change of the apparent charge as a function of the applied voltage for the three samples under investigation.
Energies 13 06540 g010
Figure 11. Waveforms of PD pulses at 5.5 kV applied voltage: (a) Paper impregnated to sNF; (b) Paper impregnated to iNF.
Figure 11. Waveforms of PD pulses at 5.5 kV applied voltage: (a) Paper impregnated to sNF; (b) Paper impregnated to iNF.
Energies 13 06540 g011
Figure 12. Potential well distribution versus the distance from the NPs’ surface.
Figure 12. Potential well distribution versus the distance from the NPs’ surface.
Energies 13 06540 g012
Table 1. Dielectric and thermal properties of the NPs.
Table 1. Dielectric and thermal properties of the NPs.
PropertyAl2O3SiC
Nominal average diameter (nm)5050
Relative permittivity9.89.7
Conductivity (S∙m−1) 10−123.16 × 10−3
Thermal Conductivity (W∙m−1/°C at 25 °C)25.5350
Table 2. Details of nanofluids studied in this work.
Table 2. Details of nanofluids studied in this work.
Sample NameNPs Concentration (% w/w)
Base0
iNFNF with 0.004% Al2O3 NPs
sNFNF with 0.004% SiC NPs
Table 3. Descriptive statistics of the compared samples.
Table 3. Descriptive statistics of the compared samples.
Sample Name (n)Mean BDV (kV)Standard Deviation (kV)ScaleShape
Base61.38.58.764.8
iNF63.88.38.967.4
sNF71.39.98.575.5
Table 4. Goodness of fit test (Anderson-Darling).
Table 4. Goodness of fit test (Anderson-Darling).
Sample Name (n)p-Value
NormalWeibull
Base0.07>0.25
iNF0.12>0.25
sNF0.32>0.25
Table 5. Breakdown Voltages at 1, 10 and 50% probability levels for normal and Weibull distributions.
Table 5. Breakdown Voltages at 1, 10 and 50% probability levels for normal and Weibull distributions.
Sample Name (n)Breakdown Cumulative Probability (%)
DistributionU50% (kV)U10% (kV)U1% (kV)
BaseNormal61.350.341.3
Weibull62.250.138.6
iNFNormal63.853.144.4
Weibull64.752.340.3
sNFNormal71.358.648.2
Weibull72.357.943.9
Table 6. Mean positive and negative LI BDVs and time to breakdown.
Table 6. Mean positive and negative LI BDVs and time to breakdown.
Sample Name (n)LI BDV (kV)Time to Breakdown (μs)
PositiveNegativePositiveNegative
Base73.4−118.716.622.3
iNF94.3−120.514.815.7
sNF77.5−123.415.724.2
Table 7. PDIV and apparent charge at the PDIV.
Table 7. PDIV and apparent charge at the PDIV.
Sample Name (n)PDIV (kV)Apparent Charge (pC)
Base2.5043.1
iNF3.60257.0
sNF4.8020.0
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Koutras, K.N.; Naxakis, I.A.; Pyrgioti, E.C.; Charalampakos, V.P.; Gonos, I.F.; Antonelou, A.E.; Yannopoulos, S.N. The Influence of Nanoparticles’ Conductivity and Charging on Dielectric Properties of Ester Oil Based Nanofluid. Energies 2020, 13, 6540. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13246540

AMA Style

Koutras KN, Naxakis IA, Pyrgioti EC, Charalampakos VP, Gonos IF, Antonelou AE, Yannopoulos SN. The Influence of Nanoparticles’ Conductivity and Charging on Dielectric Properties of Ester Oil Based Nanofluid. Energies. 2020; 13(24):6540. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13246540

Chicago/Turabian Style

Koutras, Konstantinos N., Ioannis A. Naxakis, Eleftheria C. Pyrgioti, Vasilios P. Charalampakos, Ioannis F. Gonos, Aspasia E. Antonelou, and Spyros N. Yannopoulos. 2020. "The Influence of Nanoparticles’ Conductivity and Charging on Dielectric Properties of Ester Oil Based Nanofluid" Energies 13, no. 24: 6540. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13246540

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop