You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
  • Erratum
  • Open Access

8 December 2020

Erratum: Ekenga, C.; et al. Long-Term Employment Outcomes among Female Cancer Survivors. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2751

,
,
and
1
Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA
2
Department of Social Work, St. Cloud State University, St. Cloud, MN 56301, USA
3
Department of Social Work, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Special Issue Return to Work and Occupational Health Services
Due to an error during production, Section 3.2 in the results section was inadvertently omitted in the published paper [1]. The corrected section is provided below:
3.2. Cancer and Employment Status
Table 2 presents estimates from random slope logistic regression models for employment status. In all models, women were less likely to be employed overtime. Significant intra-individual differences in employment status changes were found, with some women experiencing an improvement in employment status and others a decline. Model 1 contains the estimates for the effect of cancer on the initial level and rate of change in employment status, after adjusting for sociodemographic and health-related factors. At baseline, there was no significant difference in employment status between cancer survivors and the comparison group. Over time, however, compared to women without cancer, cancer survivors had a 1.33 times greater likelihood of working (95% Confidence Interval (CI) = 1.11–1.58).
Table 2. Cancer and Employment Status among Women a.
In Model 2, we estimated the effects of time since cancer diagnosis on employment status. Compared with women without cancer, ≤2 year cancer survivors had a 2.8 times greater likelihood of being employed at baseline (95% CI = 1.02–7.85) and a 3.3 times greater likelihood of working overtime (95% CI =1.65–6.61). Occupation type did not modify the association between cancer and employment status (Model 3). Women who were 6–10 year cancer survivors had a 2.3 times higher likelihood of being employed at baseline (95% CI = 1.04–5.20) and overtime (95% CI = 1.44–3.85) than women without a history of cancer; however, if these women had professional jobs, they were less likely to work overtime than women with unskilled or manual jobs (OR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.21–0.74) (Model 4). Health status indicators, such as fatigue and depression, were not associated with employment and had minimal impact on multivariable model estimates.
These changes do not affect the scientific results. We apologize for any inconvenience caused to readers or authors by this error. The article will be updated and the original will remain on the webpage.

Reference

  1. Ekenga, C.; Kwon, E.; Kim, B.; Park, S. Long-Term Employment Outcomes among Female Cancer Survivors. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2751. [Google Scholar]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.