Abstract
In the past few years, human health risks caused by fine particulate matters (PM2.5) and other air pollutants have gradually received attention. According to the Disaster Prevention and Protection Act of Taiwan’s Government enforced in 2017, “suspended particulate matter” has officially been acknowledged as a disaster-causing hazard. The long-term exposure to high concentrations of air pollutants negatively affects the health of citizens. Therefore, the precise determination of the spatial long-term distribution of hazardous high-level air pollutants can help protect the health and safety of residents. The analysis of spatial information of disaster potentials is an important measure for assessing the risks of possible hazards. However, the spatial disaster-potential characteristics of air pollution have not been comprehensively studied. In addition, the development of air pollution potential maps of various regions would provide valuable information. In this study, Hsinchu County was chosen as an example. In the spatial data analysis, historical PM2.5 concentration data from the Taiwan Environmental Protection Administration (TWEPA) were used to analyze and estimate spatially the air pollution risk potential of PM2.5 in Hsinchu based on a geographic information system (GIS)-based radial basis function (RBF) spatial interpolation method. The probability that PM2.5 concentrations exceed a standard value was analyzed with the exceedance probability method; in addition, the air pollution risk levels of tourist attractions in Hsinchu County were determined. The results show that the air pollution risk levels of the different seasons are quite different. The most severe air pollution levels usually occur in spring and winter, whereas summer exhibits the best air quality. Xinfeng and Hukou Townships have the highest potential for air pollution episodes in Hsinchu County (approximately 18%). Hukou Old Street, which is one of the most important tourist attractions, has a relatively high air pollution risk. The analysis results of this study can be directly applied to other countries worldwide to provide references for tourists, tourism resource management, and air quality management; in addition, the results provide important information on the long-term health risks for local residents in the study area.
    1. Introduction
Air pollution is a topic of concern worldwide; it affects the atmospheric and ecological environment and poses a serious threat to the health of humans. Owing to the rapid development of the modern industrial society, global climate change, and increasing environmental awareness of people, air pollution has received increasing attention. According to the Disaster Prevention and Protection Act of Taiwan’s Government enforced on 22 November 2017, “suspended particulate matter” has officially been acknowledged as a disaster-causing hazard.
Haze is caused by extremely small dry particles in the air, which impair visibility. Suspended particulate matter can be classified according to the particle diameter. Particles with sizes of less than 10 μm are PM10, and those with sizes of less than 2.5 μm are PM2.5. The different particle sizes have different effects on the human body; PM2.5 is smaller than PM10 and can therefore penetrate the human cilia and mucus, reach the bronchi and alveoli and then the walls of the bronchioles, and finally interfere with the gas exchange in the lungs. In addition, PM2.5 is more easily suspend in air, does not settle easily, and interacts with other air pollutants [,]. Once inhaled by a human, PM2.5 can reach the depth of the lungs and even penetrate the alveoli and enter the cardiovascular system. As blood circulates throughout the entire body, the harm to human health and ecology is more severe than that from other suspended particulate matter [,,,]. Many researchers have further pointed out that airborne fine particulate matter can directly or indirectly lead to chronic respiratory diseases, cardiovascular diseases, cancer, neurotoxicity, and even dementia diseases [,,,,]. In addition, the long-term exposure to high-concentrations of air pollutants is even more harmful [,,]. Therefore, analyzing the long-term spatial distributions of air pollution hazards (particularly PM2.5) will provide valuable information for protecting the health and safety of residents.
Over the past few years, China has repeatedly experienced extremely hazardous PM2.5 concentrations [,]. For example, on 19 October 2016, 11 provinces in China were severely affected by air pollutants. Moreover, many cities in western Taiwan are affected by both transboundary and local pollutants, and their air quality is very poor. As Taiwan’s geographical location is close to the southeast of China, it is also the main route for the cold high pressure traveling from China in winter; the transboundary pollutants from China may affect Taiwan’s air quality and the atmospheric circulation. In addition, local or regional sources of pollutants, such as transportation vehicles and factories, produce airborne particulate matter [,,].
The spatial analysis of disaster potentials is a very important part of risk assessments. As assessing the risk of hazards is crucial for a timely evacuation, the analysis of disaster potentials has become very common. The Water Resources Agency of the Ministry of Economic Affairs of Taiwan and researchers have published and applied several generations of flood potential maps for many years [,]. In addition, in the Taiwan Central Geological Survey, researchers developed and applied soil liquefaction potential maps [,,]. However, potential disasters caused by suspended particulate matter and the spatial characteristics of air pollution in the past have not been comprehensively investigated; i.e., no potential map of PM2.5 has been drawn before. In addition, a pollution potential map of various regions would provide valuable information.
Tourist attractions are important gathering places for people, particularly on holidays. Most visitors wish to relax and expect high air quality. Many researchers have studied the relationship between areas of interest and air quality; in particular, they have investigated the integration of low-cost air quality monitoring Internet of Things systems and air quality big data models [,,,,,]. Over the past few years, some Chinese researchers have analyzed the air pollution characteristics of certain specific tourist attractions [,]. However, the relationship between the overall tourist attractions and air quality has not been studied.
Hsinchu County in Taiwan has diversified industry, with equal emphasis on agriculture, industry, technology, businesses, and leisure tourism. In addition, Hsinchu County is adjacent to Hsinchu City and Hsinchu Science Park. The population and industry are developing rapidly, and large numbers of people enter Hsinchu County’s major tourism and recreation areas every holiday season. Therefore, high air quality around tourist attractions is very important. A previous study of the characteristics of air pollutants in Hsinchu has shown that the PM2.5, total PAHs (Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons), and BaPeq (benzo(a)pyrene equivalent) mass concentrations during the seasons had the following order: winter > autumn > spring > summer with significant seasonal variations []. Some early studies focused on the impacts of the large and dense high-tech industries in the Hsinchu Science Park on health and the environment [,,]; in addition, the researchers considered the emissions of toxic compounds such as VOCs (Volatile Organic Compounds) and arsenical emissions; however, there have been few relevant studies in the past decade.
Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the exposure risks of tourist attractions based on the potential map of PM2.5 calculated by the exceedance probability and spatial estimation methods. In this study, the Hsinchu County area was taken as an example. Historical data of PM2.5 concentrations from the Taiwan Environmental Protection Administration (TWEPA) were used to analyze spatially the air pollution hazard potential of PM2.5 concentrations in Hsinchu County based on geographic information system (GIS) statistics. The potential threat of PM2.5 concentrations exceeding a certain standard was spatially investigated with the exceedance probability method; furthermore, the air pollution risk levels of areas with tourist attractions in Hsinchu County were determined. The analysis results of this study can be directly applied to other countries worldwide; they provide references for tourists, tourism resource management, and air quality management, and important information on the long-term health risks for local residents in the study area.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
The terrain of Hsinchu County is mainly composed of flat land, hills, and mountains. There are 13 administrative districts (towns and cities), and its development industries are diverse; they can be mainly classified into agriculture, industry (including science and high technology), commerce, and leisure tourism (Figure 1). Zhubei City is an important town in terms of commerce, economics, and politics; its industries develop high-tech electronics (such as in the Taiyuan Science and Technology Park). The inflow of industrial capital into Zhudong town comprises real estate capital and high-tech manufacturing capital. Like those of Zhubei City, its industries comprise mainly commerce and industry (such as the Industrial Technology Research Institute). The Hukou and Baoshan Townships have the most developed industries and are the production bases for the technology and manufacturing industries, such as the Hsinchu Industrial Park of the Industrial Development Bureau, the Ministry of Economic Affairs in Hukou Township, and high-tech companies such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company and other high-tech factories in Baoshan Township. Baoshan Reservoir and Baoshan Second Reservoir are important water resources for the Hsinchu Science Park. Moreover, the Emei and Wufeng Townships focus on agriculture (tea, oranges, peaches, and sweet persimmons). The Xinfeng, Xinpu, Qionglin, and Beipu Townships exhibit agricultural activities and the establishment of regional industrial zones for the industrial development. Guanxi town, Jianshi Township, and Hengshan Township focus mainly on agriculture and the development of tourism and leisure industries (such as Guanxi Grass, Neiwan Old Street, orchard sightseeing, and visits to the Taiwanese aboriginal people).
      
    
    Figure 1.
      Main industry types of 13 townships and cities in Hsinchu County.
  
To minimize the impacts of disasters, the disaster characteristics of local key industries are studied based on disaster potential data. The results should be sent to the local governmental agencies and key industries (such as the industrial and agricultural management units) in Hsinchu County as an important reference for disaster prevention. More importantly, improvements in areas with higher risks should be prioritized. The main disaster types faced in Hsinchu County can be roughly distinguished according to the topography. The administrative areas on flat land, such as the Zhudong, Hukou, and Xinpu Townships, may experience floods and droughts, and the mountainous administrative areas, such as the Jianshi and Wufeng Townships, can predominantly suffer from landslides or mudflows; in addition, the area close to the sea may face tsunamis. Owing to the development of industrial areas, the Hukou, Baoshan, and Qionglin Townships may suffer man-made disasters caused by toxic chemicals and air pollutants. The industrial characteristics and major and minor risks in the 13 towns and cities in Hsinchu County are summarized in Table 1.
       
    
    Table 1.
    Main industrial characteristics and potential disaster risks of 13 townships and cities in Hsinchu County.
  
2.2. Framework of Risk Analysis
The potential refers to the frequency or probability of the occurrence of disasters in an area; the determined potential can be used as a reference for future risk assessments. In this study, the hourly data of PM2.5 concentrations measured by the TWEPA in Taiwan in 2017 were used, and spatial interpolation was applied to estimate the hourly PM2.5 concentration of each grid point in the county. Subsequently, the probability that the PM2.5 concentration of each grid point exceeds the standard value statistically was calculated. The air quality index that corresponds to the unhealthy PM2.5 concentration for sensitive groups (35.4 μg/m3) was used as the concentration standard. This probability can be represented based on the exceedance probability of older data, which represents the spatial distribution of the potential of PM2.5. The analysis process is shown in Figure 2.
      
    
    Figure 2.
      Flow chart of the construction of an air pollution potential map and risk analysis.
  
After determining the spatial distribution of the air pollution potentials, the air pollution risk levels in various tourist areas in Hsinchu County were examined. As shown in Figure 2, the PM2.5 concentrations are based on data from the TWEPA’s Taiwan-wide air quality-monitoring stations from 2017; in addition, radial basis function (RBF) spatial interpolation was used to estimate the grid-like PM2.5 concentrations in the Hsinchu County area, and the exceedance probability method was applied to calculate the probability that the PM2.5 concentration of each grid point exceeds the standard. Finally, the potential air pollution risks in the areas of the major tourist attractions in Hsinchu County were examined. The PM2.5 concentration standard used in this study is based on the air quality index, which considers six levels: good, normal, unhealthy for sensitive groups, unhealthy for all people, very unhealthy, and hazardous. When the “unhealthy for sensitive groups” degree has been reached, it is generally recommended that residents reduce outdoor activities and prolonged vigorous exercise. Therefore, the PM2.5 concentration standard (35.4 μg/m3) corresponding to the “unhealthy air quality for sensitive groups” degree was used as the threshold. In this study, the analysis results of the probability that the PM2.5 concentration exceeds the standard were classified into eight levels. In addition, most areas of the Jianshi and Wufeng Townships are too far from the TWEPA’s air quality monitoring station (15 km from the monitoring station) and mainly in high mountainous terrain; thus, they were not included in the calculations.
2.3. Data Collection
First, the hourly PM2.5 concentrations collected by 76 air quality-monitoring stations of the TWEPA in Taiwan in 2017 were collected. The 327 datasets from areas with tourist attractions originate from the official open data website of the Hsinchu County Government, which were collected in 2019 (https://www.hsinchu.gov.tw/OpenDataDetail.aspx?n=902&s=272).
2.4. Spatial Analysis of Data
The PM2.5 concentrations throughout Taiwan were estimated with the data from the monitoring stations and RBF spatial interpolation method [,,]. The RBF interpolation is one of the most precise interpolation methods. The interpolation function must pass through the observation value of each station and generate a smooth surface. RBF interpolation is a mesh-free method, constructing high-order accurate interpolants of unstructured data. It takes the form of a weighted sum of radial basis functions. In addition, the RBF interpolation method uses a symmetric function centered at each observation point and calculates the change in the distance from the observation point to obtain the weight of each function:
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
        where  is a centrosymmetric function and  the weight of each function; the interpolation function  can be obtained by solving the equations.
The RBF interpolation method has a good effect on flat surfaces (for concentration diffusion, for instance). In this study, Taiwan was divided into approximately 32,000 grid points, the hourly PM2.5 concentration of each grid point was estimated with the RBF interpolation method, and the probabilities that the grid points exceed the concentration standard were determined; and finally, we cut and selected the study area of Hsinchu County; ESRI ArcGIS was used to calculate and draw the exceedance probability map. In this study, the exceedance probability of the hourly air pollution concentration was defined as the probability that the hourly data (of an entire year) exceed a certain concentration standard. The air quality index that corresponds to the unhealthy PM2.5 concentration for sensitive groups (35.4 μg/m3) was used as the concentration standard:
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
        where  is the exceedance probability,  the number of times in which the hourly data exceed a certain concentration standard in one year, and  the total number of hourly data of one year. The research data were analyzed with Python and ESRI ArcGIS.
3. Results
3.1. Analysis of Air Pollution Potential
The PM2.5 concentration is greatly affected by meteorological factors; therefore, the data were investigated according to the different seasons (spring: March–May; summer: June–August; autumn: September–November; winter: December–February). The results are shown in Figure 3. The gray area is too far from the air quality station and was therefore excluded. The analysis results show that the pollution potential in spring (Figure 3a) and winter (Figure 3d) is higher; the probability that the standard concentration in all towns and cities is exceeded is 9.5%, particularly in spring when the Xinfeng and Hukou Townships have probabilities of more than 18%; the probability decreases from the northwest plain area to the southeast mountainous area. The pollution potential in summer and autumn is relatively low; the probability that the standard is exceeded in autumn is generally only approximately 5%. The potential in the northern area of Hsinchu County adjacent to Taoyuan City is higher. In summer, the probability does not exceed 1%, and the probability of pollution in the area near Zhudong Station is slightly higher. Figure 4 and Table 2 show the detailed boxplots and basic statistics of the exceedance probabilities of the 13 townships and cities in Hsinchu County, respectively.
      
    
    Figure 3.
      Distribution of PM2.5 potential in the study area in Hsinchu County in different seasons. Overall, 76 air quality-monitoring stations of the Taiwan Environmental Protection Administration (TWEPA) across the whole of Taiwan were used for spatial estimation, and we extracted the region of Hsinchu County for further analysis. (a) PM2.5 potential map in spring. (b) PM2.5 potential map in summer. (c) PM2.5 potential map in fall. (d) PM2.5 potential map in winter.
  
      
    
    Figure 4.
      Boxplot of exceedance probabilities of 13 townships and cities in Hsinchu County.
  
       
    
    Table 2.
    Basic statistics of exceedance probabilities of 13 townships and cities in Hsinchu County.
  
3.2. Risk Analysis of Areas with Tourist Attractions
The spatial distribution map of the PM2.5 potential was overlaid on a map of the various tourist areas in Hsinchu County; the most severe spring PM2.5 potential was chosen, as shown in Figure 5, Table 3 and Table 4. The results show that the probability that the standard is exceeded is greater than 18%; the areas with the most severe air pollution potential level (level 6) have three important tourist attractions: the Caixiang Trail, Xiansheng Temple, and Hukou Armored New Village (Village B). The areas of level 5 (16% to 18% chance of exceeding the standard) and level 4 (14% to 16% chance of exceeding the standard) potential—slightly higher potential—have 11 and 7 tourist attractions, respectively. The 11 tourist attractions with level 5 potential are Rongyuanpu Farm, Laohukou Catholic Church Cultural Center, Renhe Trail, Yao Art Street and Bicycle Taro, Hanqing Trail, Hukou Old Street, Xinfeng Sanyuan Temple, Yongning Temple, Chifu Wangye Temple, Hongmaogang Ecological Recreation Area, and Xinfengpuyuan Temple. Another 114 tourist areas are at level 3 (exceeding rates of 12% to 14%), and 124 tourist areas are at level 2 (exceeding rates of 10% to 12%); these locations still exhibit rates greater than 10% in spring (Table A1). These areas encounter a higher risk of air pollution with excessive PM2.5 concentrations. The highest air pollution potentials of the tourist attractions with levels 5 and 6 in Hsinchu County are shown in Table 4; they are located in the Hukou and Xinfeng Townships. As many tourist areas in Hsinchu County are located in hilly or mountainous areas, they are less exposed to PM2.5. Only the scenic spots in the Hukou and Xinfeng Townships experience relatively high PM2.5 concentrations. The detailed PM2.5 air pollution potential of each tourist attraction in Hsinchu County is shown in Appendix A.
      
    
    Figure 5.
      Distribution of PM2.5 potential in tourist areas in Hsinchu County in spring in 2017.
  
       
    
    Table 3.
    Levels of air pollution potential and numbers of affected tourist attractions.
  
       
    
    Table 4.
    Highest air pollution potentials of tourist attractions—levels 5 and 6—in Hsinchu County.
  
3.3. Analysis of Population Density and Air Pollution Exposure Risk
Moreover, the PM2.5 potential spatial distribution map was investigated based on the population density of each township in Hsinchu County (Table 5) to analyze the long-term air pollution exposure risks for residents. According to Figure 6, the population density is correlated with the PM2.5 potential distribution. The Pearson correlation coefficient between the PM2.5 potential and population density in towns throughout the year is 0.44. If it is explored according to the season, the correlation coefficients between the PM2.5 potential and population density in spring, summer, autumn, and winter are 0.36, −0.46, 0.34, and 0.64, respectively. Zhubei City (3885.10 persons per square kilometer), Zhudong town (1811.10 persons per square kilometer), Hukou Township (1325.41 persons per square kilometer), and Xinfeng Township (1226.25 persons per square kilometer) have higher population densities than the remaining areas and therefore higher PM2.5 potentials. A high population density reflects the degree of development and traffic in the city. According to Figure 7, the main industrial areas of Hsinchu County are mostly concentrated in these towns and villages and the main source of pollution. Owing to the prevailing northeast monsoon conditions in winter, these areas have higher pollution risks. Although many tourist attractions are not located in the areas with high air pollution potentials, many residents live in areas with relatively high air pollution potentials for a long time.
       
    
    Table 5.
    Population density of each township in Hsinchu County in 2020.
  
      
    
    Figure 6.
      PM2.5 potential distribution and population density of each township in Hsinchu County.
  
      
    
    Figure 7.
      Map of industrial areas and air quality stations.
  
4. Discussion
The change in and accumulation, diffusion, and transmission of PM2.5 concentrations are greatly affected by the meteorological conditions or weather patterns [,,]. The analysis results of the air pollution potentials in Figure 3 are consistent with the general air pollution season in Taiwan (winter and spring). The main reason is that the main prevailing wind in Taiwan in winter and spring is the northeast monsoon; thus, the western half is not affected because of the mountains. The leeward places are likely to experience accumulations of pollutants, particularly central and southwestern Taiwan [,,]. Furthermore, the northeast monsoon tends to bring foreign pollutants from west China into this area []. Therefore, the Xinfeng and Hukou areas in Hsinchu County have the highest pollution potentials in winter and spring. In addition, Hsinchu Industrial Park lies in the Xinfeng and Hukou area, and the northern region is close to major stationary pollution sources, such as Taoyuan Youth Industrial Park, Pingjhen Industrial Park, and Yongan Industrial Park (Figure 7). Zhubei City and Hsinchu Science Park in the south are densely populated areas with long-term traffic congestion and are the main sources of mobile pollution in Hsinchu County and Hsinchu City [,,,]. Both spring and winter are high-pollution seasons, but spring exhibits more evident pollution sources (Figure 3).
In order to further compare the PM2.5 potential distribution in different years, in addition to Figure 5 showing 2017, Figure 8 shows the dynamic distributions of PM2.5 potential in tourist areas in Hsinchu County in spring in 2018 and 2019. They show spatial distributions similar to 2017, and Xinfeng and Hukou also have the highest potential. However, it is obvious that the overall probability of PM2.5 exceeding the standard has been declining in the entire region in recent years. In addition to the influences of meteorological conditions in different years, it may be due to the implementation of government policies and the increase in people’s awareness of environmental protection.
      
    
    Figure 8.
      Dynamic distribution of PM2.5 potential in tourist areas in Hsinchu County in spring in (a) 2018 (b) 2019.
  
Moreover, Xinpu, Guanxi, Qionglin, Baoshan, Emei, and Beipu are dominated by hilly land; this less densely populated area exhibits agricultural, industrial, and touristic activities; thus, the air quality is evidently better than in other areas in all seasons. The Hengshan, Jianshi, and Wufeng Townships have mostly mountainous terrain, and the populations are sparser; consequently, they have the best air quality. In addition, because the west side of Hsinchu is adjacent to the sea and the east side exhibits mostly hilly terrain, the topographical effect is affected by the prevailing wind and major sources of emissions in the air pollution season []. Therefore, air pollutants in Hsinchu accumulate easily in the relatively flat plains, such as in Xinfeng and Hukou, which is consistent with the results of this study. Some researchers have investigated the impacts of terrain effects on air pollution [], particularly the basin effects [,]; some researchers have used geostatistical models to estimate the PM2.5 concentrations []. Fortunately, most of the tourist areas in Hsinchu County are located in areas with lower PM2.5 air pollution potentials, and the areas with higher air pollution potentials are mostly those with industrial and technological activities. Nevertheless, the areas with high pollution potentials have higher population densities. A high population density leads to more emission sources. Some researchers have used the spatial econometric model to investigate the relationship between the population density and air pollution in Chinese cities; they have discovered a significant positive correlation between the population density and PM2.5 concentration [,], which is consistent with the results of this study.
5. Conclusions
In this study, an air pollution potential map was constructed. The results show that the potentials of different seasons are quite different. The most severe air pollution seasons are spring and winter, whereas summer exhibits the best air quality. Xinfeng and Hukou Townships in Hsinchu County have the highest potential (approximately 18%). Hukou Old Street, which is the most famous tourist attraction, has a relatively high pollution risk. The population density is positively correlated with the PM2.5 potential distribution in most seasons, except for summer. In this study, the hazard potential levels of PM2.5 concentrations exceeding a certain standard were investigated; the exceedance probability and the air pollution potential levels of various tourist areas in Hsinchu County were examined. However, the information on tourist attractions considered in this research study is limited and based on only few important attractions. The air pollution potential map can be combined with more detailed tourist attraction maps in the future. In addition, the map can be applied to investigate the impacts of pollution on schools, elderly people, hospitals, and nurseries to determine their potential long-term exposure risks. Although the study area in Hsinchu County has only three important tourist attractions with the most severe air pollution potential levels (level 6), there are still many schools and residents in these areas.
In the future, a map for the entire country will be constructed; the proposed framework can be directly applied to other countries worldwide. In addition, the spatial and temporal changes in the air pollution potential during different years can be analyzed, and the air pollution data of one year can be expanded to more than five or ten years. In addition to reducing the possibility of being more extreme in certain years, understanding the temporal changes in the spatial distribution of the pollution potentials is more effective for assessing dynamic risks. In addition to providing a reference for tourists, the results provide information on the long-term health risks for local residents in the study area.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, Y.-C.L.; methodology, Y.-C.L.; software, C.-Y.L. and H.-S.S.; validation, Y.-C.L. and H.-S.S.; formal analysis, C.-Y.L. and H.-S.S.; investigation, Y.-C.L.; resources, Y.-C.L. and J.-K.T.; data curation, C.-Y.L.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.-C.L. and C.-Y.L.; writing—review and editing, Y.-C.L.; visualization, C.-Y.L. and H.-S.S.; supervision, Y.-C.L.; project administration, Y.-C.L. and J.-K.T.; funding acquisition, Y.-C.L. and J.-K.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
We are grateful for the support funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology (Taiwan): project numbers MOST 108-2119-M-008-003, MOST 108-2636-E-008-004 (Young Scholar Fellowship Program), and MOST 108-2638-E-008-001-MY2 (Shackleton Program Grant).
Acknowledgments
In addition, we are thankful for the cooperation of the Research Center for Hazard Mitigation and Prevention of the National Central University, the Fire Bureau, Hsinchu County Government, and the National Science and Technology Center for Disaster Reduction (NCDR). The ESRI ArcGIS tool and Python and its modules served as powerful tools in our data analysis.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Appendix A
       
    
    Table A1.
    Detailed air pollution potential of each tourist attraction in Hsinchu County.
  
Table A1.
    Detailed air pollution potential of each tourist attraction in Hsinchu County.
      | Number | Name | District | Longitude | Latitude | The Level of Air Pollution Potential | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Caixiang trail | Hukou Township | 121.02028 | 24.891221 | 6 | 
| 2 | Xiansheng Temple | Hukou Township | 121.047989 | 24.902892 | 6 | 
| 3 | Hukou Armored New Village (Village B) | Hukou Township | 121.047808 | 24.904483 | 6 | 
| 4 | Rongyuanpu Farm | Hukou Township | 121.0442 | 24.8754 | 5 | 
| 5 | Laohukou Catholic Church Cultural Center | Hukou Township | 121.05516 | 24.87657 | 5 | 
| 6 | Renhe Trail | Hukou Township | 121.058497 | 24.877032 | 5 | 
| 7 | Yao Art Street and Bicycle Taro | Hukou Township | 121.0575 | 24.8773 | 5 | 
| 8 | Hanqing Trail | Hukou Township | 121.05192 | 24.877399 | 5 | 
| 9 | Hukou Old Street | Hukou Township | 121.052612 | 24.877742 | 5 | 
| 10 | Xinfeng Sanyuan Temple | Xinfeng Township | 120.9979 | 24.8999 | 5 | 
| 11 | Yongning Temple | Xinfeng Township | 120.985265 | 24.90248 | 5 | 
| 12 | Chifu Wangye Temple | Xinfeng Township | 120.9764 | 24.9102 | 5 | 
| 13 | Hongmaogang Ecological Recreation Area | Xinfeng Township | 120.976365 | 24.910229 | 5 | 
| 14 | Xinfengpuyuan Temple | Xinfeng Township | 120.977599 | 24.924916 | 5 | 
| 15 | Golden World Leisure Farm | Xinpu Township | 121.022115 | 24.853193 | 4 | 
| 16 | Pinewood Brick and Tile Exhibition Hall | Xinfeng Township | 120.990757 | 24.868983 | 4 | 
| 17 | Hukou Tourist Tea Garden | Hukou Township | 121.0779 | 24.8729 | 4 | 
| 18 | Xinfeng Golf Course | Xinfeng Township | 120.976496 | 24.882496 | 4 | 
| 19 | Zaixing Golf Course | Hukou Township | 121.091008 | 24.883679 | 4 | 
| 20 | Xinfeng Wetland | Xinfeng Township | 120.9719 | 24.9072 | 4 | 
| 21 | Xinfeng Seawall | Xinfeng Township | 120.97 | 24.9075 | 4 | 
| 22 | Yuquanshan Puzhao Temple | Zhudong Township | 121.082939 | 24.732835 | 3 | 
| 23 | Luliaokeng Trail | Qionglin Township | 121.116898 | 24.733726 | 3 | 
| 24 | Forest Park Trail | Zhudong Township | 121.084495 | 24.73457 | 3 | 
| 25 | Tree Qilin Cultural Center | Zhudong Township | 121.095789 | 24.735623 | 3 | 
| 26 | Touqianxi Ecological Park | Zhudong Township | 121.099787 | 24.736033 | 3 | 
| 27 | Five Harmony Temple | Qionglin Township | 121.1201 | 24.7364 | 3 | 
| 28 | Zhudong Central Market | Zhudong Township | 121.091482 | 24.736809 | 3 | 
| 29 | Ruanqiao Rainbow Village | Zhudong Township | 121.091482 | 24.736809 | 3 | 
| 30 | Zhudong Forestry Exhibition Hall | Zhudong Township | 121.093314 | 24.736851 | 3 | 
| 31 | Zhudong Forestry Exhibition Hall | Zhudong Township | 121.093314 | 24.736851 | 3 | 
| 32 | Ue Pine Wood Bamboo East Branch Office | Zhudong Township | 121.0932 | 24.7373 | 3 | 
| 33 | Draw a new page | Zhudong Township | 121.094026 | 24.737928 | 3 | 
| 34 | Zhudong Railway Station | Zhudong Township | 121.094831 | 24.738177 | 3 | 
| 35 | Zhudong City Bike Path | Zhudong Township | 121.094742 | 24.738245 | 3 | 
| 36 | Flower World Play Cloth Workshop | Zhudong Township | 121.08613 | 24.738522 | 3 | 
| 37 | Xiao Rusong Art Park | Zhudong Township | 121.088201 | 24.739425 | 3 | 
| 38 | Xiao Rusong Former Residence Complex | Zhudong Township | 121.088201 | 24.739425 | 3 | 
| 39 | Huangcheng Bamboo Curtain Cultural Center | Zhudong Township | 121.091755 | 24.739675 | 3 | 
| 40 | Ganlu Temple | Zhudong Township | 121.080823 | 24.744548 | 3 | 
| 41 | Juqing | Zhudong Township | 121.0856 | 24.745265 | 3 | 
| 42 | Mingguan Art Museum | Zhudong Township | 121.080119 | 24.745529 | 3 | 
| 43 | Duanmu Shiitake Mushroom Farm | Qionglin Township | 121.140157 | 24.747489 | 3 | 
| 44 | Luliaokeng Mushroom Farm | Qionglin Township | 121.1402 | 24.7475 | 3 | 
| 45 | Zhubei. Zhudongtou Qianxi Bicycle Path | Qionglin Township | 121.094635 | 24.749005 | 3 | 
| 46 | Jiujiu Health Tomato Museum | Qionglin Township | 121.095419 | 24.751802 | 3 | 
| 47 | Xionglin Luliaokeng Bell Room | Qionglin Township | 121.140648 | 24.758295 | 3 | 
| 48 | Fulin Farm | Qionglin Township | 121.090064 | 24.761744 | 3 | 
| 49 | Feifeng Wenchang | Qionglin Township | 121.091294 | 24.762308 | 3 | 
| 50 | Shiming Tomato Farm | Guanxi Township | 121.173188 | 24.765512 | 3 | 
| 51 | Wenlin Court | Qionglin Township | 121.0826 | 24.7733 | 3 | 
| 52 | Deng Yuxian Music and Culture Memorial Park | Qionglin Township | 121.085126 | 24.773326 | 3 | 
| 53 | Zhiliaowo Papermaking Workshop | Qionglin Township | 121.082624 | 24.780282 | 3 | 
| 54 | Jin Yong DIY Tomato Farm | Guanxi Township | 121.180745 | 24.782149 | 3 | 
| 55 | Jin Guangfu Mansion | Guanxi Township | 121.176841 | 24.78657 | 3 | 
| 56 | Luo Wu College | Guanxi Township | 121.175658 | 24.787931 | 3 | 
| 57 | Guanxi Windward Museum | Guanxi Township | 121.183708 | 24.788557 | 3 | 
| 58 | Guanxi Taiwan Black Tea Company | Guanxi Township | 121.175753 | 24.791305 | 3 | 
| 59 | Taiwan Red Tea Cultural Center | Guanxi Township | 121.175753 | 24.791305 | 3 | 
| 60 | Guanxi Donganqiao | Guanxi Township | 121.178174 | 24.791512 | 3 | 
| 61 | Instant burned grass, natural ancient flavor [Agricultural good companion 1. Guanxi Town Farmers’ Association Tour] | Guanxi Township | 121.176829 | 24.791634 | 3 | 
| 62 | Guanxi Niulan River Bicycle Path | Guanxi Township | 121.180862 | 24.792248 | 3 | 
| 63 | Guanxi Catholic Church | Guanxi Township | 121.176419 | 24.794329 | 3 | 
| 64 | Xinbao Tourist Orchard | Xinpu Township | 121.085477 | 24.796986 | 3 | 
| 65 | Pinglin Hiking Trail | Guanxi Township | 121.14066 | 24.80115 | 3 | 
| 66 | Mingdeng Ancient Road | Guanxi Township | 121.187 | 24.802 | 3 | 
| 67 | Guanxi Town Farmers’ Association Xiancao Processing Factory | Guanxi Township | 121.162535 | 24.8029 | 3 | 
| 68 | Yuanhe Temple | Guanxi Township | 121.135645 | 24.803515 | 3 | 
| 69 | Daluo Strawberry Farm | Guanxi Township | 121.160606 | 24.803821 | 3 | 
| 70 | Fukuda Strawberry Farm | Guanxi Township | 121.160099 | 24.804235 | 3 | 
| 71 | Gaoping Tomato Farm | Guanxi Township | 121.152527 | 24.805734 | 3 | 
| 72 | Gillian Strawberry Farm | Guanxi Township | 121.144999 | 24.805949 | 3 | 
| 73 | Lu Ji Farm | Guanxi Township | 121.144999 | 24.805949 | 3 | 
| 74 | Shiquan Farm | Guanxi Township | 121.144999 | 24.805949 | 3 | 
| 75 | Da Asah Valley Orchid Farm | Guanxi Township | 121.140345 | 24.809045 | 3 | 
| 76 | Xiangzhangyuan Leisure Farm | Xinpu Township | 121.080152 | 24.810143 | 3 | 
| 77 | Agen Strawberry Farm | Guanxi Township | 121.116085 | 24.816814 | 3 | 
| 78 | Shuangyuan Leisure Farm | Zhubei City | 121.0357 | 24.8239 | 3 | 
| 79 | Leofoo Village Theme Park | Guanxi Township | 121.180728 | 24.824679 | 3 | 
| 80 | Yunhai Leisure Tea Factory | Guanxi Township | 121.162268 | 24.824891 | 3 | 
| 81 | Xiaolixi Bicycle Path | Xinpu Township | 121.087924 | 24.825068 | 3 | 
| 82 | Yuanxin Persimmon | Guanxi Township | 121.1168 | 24.8254 | 3 | 
| 83 | Guannanyangtang Tang House | Guanxi Township | 121.114123 | 24.82637 | 3 | 
| 84 | Xinpu Liu Family Ancestral Hall | Xinpu Township | 121.075093 | 24.827271 | 3 | 
| 85 | Xinpu Zhu Family Temple | Xinpu Township | 121.076351 | 24.827356 | 3 | 
| 86 | Xinpu Pan House | Xinpu Township | 121.075982 | 24.827584 | 3 | 
| 87 | Sky, People, Things, I-Whole People Xinpu | Xinpu Township | 121.071 | 24.828 | 3 | 
| 88 | Zhaomen Agricultural Recreation Area | Xinpu Township | 121.071278 | 24.828042 | 3 | 
| 89 | Xinpu Elementary School Principal Dormitory | Xinpu Township | 121.079223 | 24.828081 | 3 | 
| 90 | Happy childhood | Xinpu Township | 121.079138 | 24.828126 | 3 | 
| 91 | Zhu Jincheng Studio | Xinpu Township | 121.036754 | 24.82826 | 3 | 
| 92 | Wow, delicious persimmon! | Xinpu Township | 121.074935 | 24.828382 | 3 | 
| 93 | Xinpu Chen’s Ancestral Hall | Xinpu Township | 121.076451 | 24.828393 | 3 | 
| 94 | Xinpu Fan Family Temple | Xinpu Township | 121.07597 | 24.828541 | 3 | 
| 95 | Xinpu Lin Family Temple | Xinpu Township | 121.0761 | 24.8292 | 3 | 
| 96 | Comic Art Square | Xinpu Township | 121.073196 | 24.829343 | 3 | 
| 97 | Yiyuan Hakka Cuisine | Guanxi Township | 121.122728 | 24.830801 | 3 | 
| 98 | New farmers market | Xinpu Township | 121.087698 | 24.831114 | 3 | 
| 99 | Sansheng Temple | Xinpu Township | 121.098799 | 24.831432 | 3 | 
| 100 | Flying Dragon Hiking Trail | Xinpu Township | 121.098799 | 24.831432 | 3 | 
| 101 | Persimmon Dyeing Workshop | Xinpu Township | 121.079142 | 24.833894 | 3 | 
| 102 | Zhubei Tianhou Temple | Zhubei City | 121.011231 | 24.835694 | 3 | 
| 103 | Shaotanwo Old Road | Xinpu Township | 121.049186 | 24.837801 | 3 | 
| 104 | Wu Zhuoliu’s Former Residence | Xinpu Township | 121.109831 | 24.838011 | 3 | 
| 105 | Xinpu Shangfangliao Liu House | Xinpu Township | 121.04949 | 24.838082 | 3 | 
| 106 | Chunhe Farm | Xinpu Township | 121.039527 | 24.838179 | 3 | 
| 107 | The happy persimmon feeling blown by the wind | Xinpu Township | 121.076663 | 24.840959 | 3 | 
| 108 | Barbarian’s Fortune Land | Zhubei City | 120.997423 | 24.841493 | 3 | 
| 109 | Fengshanxi Fangliao Village Bicycle Path | Xinpu Township | 121.0442 | 24.8416 | 3 | 
| 110 | Zhubei Citizen Farm | Zhubei City | 120.998011 | 24.842051 | 3 | 
| 111 | Xinpu Baozhong Pavilion | Xinpu Township | 121.036271 | 24.843354 | 3 | 
| 112 | Jinhan Dried Persimmons, Arrow Bamboo Nest, Orchard, Zhulan Garden” Rural Regeneration Tour of Daping Community, Xinpu 1 | Xinpu Township | 121.078579 | 24.844258 | 3 | 
| 113 | Drying Persimmon in Jinhan Farm | Xinpu Township | 121.078578 | 24.84426 | 3 | 
| 114 | Shangpinxiang Orchard | Xinpu Township | 121.069021 | 24.84437 | 3 | 
| 115 | Li Village Farm | Xinpu Township | 121.0715 | 24.84738 | 3 | 
| 116 | Zhaomen Trail Group-Huaizu Trail | Xinpu Township | 121.105264 | 24.848389 | 3 | 
| 117 | Fuming New Farm | Xinpu Township | 121.101378 | 24.849639 | 3 | 
| 118 | Lin Family Orchard | Xinpu Township | 121.101759 | 24.851476 | 3 | 
| 119 | Gou Bei Kiln Studio | Zhubei City | 120.985133 | 24.852155 | 3 | 
| 120 | Nanping, Beipingli Bicycle Path | Xinpu Township | 121.0864 | 24.8525 | 3 | 
| 121 | Bamboo Garden | Xinpu Township | 121.101963 | 24.852972 | 3 | 
| 122 | Crossing the Borders and Traveling in the North Country Scenery ~ Winter’s Jingu Farm | Xinpu Township | 121.105574 | 24.854441 | 3 | 
| 123 | Fuxiang Cactus Succulent Botanical Garden | Xinpu Township | 121.092191 | 24.855623 | 3 | 
| 124 | Liujiazhuang Braised Chicken | Xinpu Township | 121.105662 | 24.856742 | 3 | 
| 125 | Zhoujiazhuang Sightseeing Farm (Recreation Inn) | Xinpu Township | 121.1042 | 24.857374 | 3 | 
| 126 | Red Dragon Fruit Sightseeing Orchard | Zhubei City | 120.96128 | 24.858706 | 3 | 
| 127 | Chenjia Farm | Xinpu Township | 121.103731 | 24.860894 | 3 | 
| 128 | Zhaomen Trail Group-Guannan Trail | Xinpu Township | 121.1037 | 24.8609 | 3 | 
| 129 | Wind movement, Jinghai, Xiange | Zhubei City | 120.963966 | 24.861473 | 3 | 
| 130 | Zhubei‧Binhai Recreation Area | Zhubei City | 120.946333 | 24.865234 | 3 | 
| 131 | Tiande Temple | Xinfeng Township | 120.9797 | 24.8675 | 3 | 
| 132 | Zhubei Coastal Forest Conservation Area | Zhubei City | 120.95143 | 24.87045 | 3 | 
| 133 | Lianhua Temple | Zhubei City | 120.961164 | 24.876555 | 3 | 
| 134 | Fengqi Sunset | Zhubei City | 120.961164 | 24.876555 | 3 | 
| 135 | Zhubei Lotus Temple Wetland | Zhubei City | 120.9612 | 24.8766 | 3 | 
| 136 | Sakura Forest Leisure Farm | Wufeng Township | 121.092207 | 24.63246 | 2 | 
| 137 | Liangshan Tribe | Wufeng Township | 121.1236 | 24.6451 | 2 | 
| 138 | Shangrui Orange Garden | Zhudong Township | 121.1151 | 24.6626 | 2 | 
| 139 | Beipu Cold Spring | Beipu Township | 121.072811 | 24.663056 | 2 | 
| 140 | Shangping Old Street | Zhudong Township | 121.093986 | 24.66359 | 2 | 
| 141 | Youdian Grass Ecological Farm | Beipu Township | 121.05329 | 24.67397 | 2 | 
| 142 | Huisen Natural Leisure Farm | Beipu Township | 121.0545 | 24.6744 | 2 | 
| 143 | Riding a Dragon | Hengshan Township | 121.150594 | 24.68251 | 2 | 
| 144 | Dashanbei Leisure Farm | Hengshan Township | 121.150594 | 24.68251 | 2 | 
| 145 | Emei Catholic Church | Emei Township | 121.021722 | 24.688162 | 2 | 
| 146 | Emei Catholic Church | Emei Township | 121.021722 | 24.688162 | 2 | 
| 147 | Mingsheng Ecological Leisure Farm | Beipu Township | 121.041911 | 24.688309 | 2 | 
| 148 | Emei Lake Scenic Area | Emei Township | 121.019586 | 24.688769 | 2 | 
| 149 | Dangui Temple | Emei Township | 121.021527 | 24.688846 | 2 | 
| 150 | Emei Elementary School | Emei Township | 121.020109 | 24.688953 | 2 | 
| 151 | Dahu Mountain Forest | Beipu Township | 121.087718 | 24.690279 | 2 | 
| 152 | Bamboo Yucha Reed Sweet Potato | Beipu Township | 121.041675 | 24.692211 | 2 | 
| 153 | Summer Garden Organic Farm | Zhudong Township | 121.102428 | 24.69276 | 2 | 
| 154 | King Kong Temple | Beipu Township | 121.044 | 24.6928 | 2 | 
| 155 | North Point Suspension Bridge | Jianshi Township | 121.202652 | 24.696684 | 2 | 
| 156 | Maike Tianyuan Leisure Farm | Beipu Township | 121.042268 | 24.697066 | 2 | 
| 157 | Beipu Jiang Family Temple | Beipu Township | 121.056501 | 24.697733 | 2 | 
| 158 | Xiaomi decorative artwork | Jianshi Township | 121.205046 | 24.698166 | 2 | 
| 159 | Deng Nanguang Image Memorial Hall | Beipu Township | 121.058038 | 24.698537 | 2 | 
| 160 | Deng Nanguang Image Memorial Hall | Beipu Township | 121.058038 | 24.698537 | 2 | 
| 161 | Beipu Zhongshu Church | Beipu Township | 121.057879 | 24.698851 | 2 | 
| 162 | Dashanbei Leshantang | Hengshan Township | 121.139447 | 24.699327 | 2 | 
| 163 | Chen Yongbin Woodworking DIY Studio | Beipu Township | 121.04361 | 24.699473 | 2 | 
| 164 | Xiuluan Park | Beipu Township | 121.0601 | 24.6996 | 2 | 
| 165 | Beipu Old Street, Nanpu Village Bicycle Path | Beipu Township | 121.057392 | 24.6997 | 2 | 
| 166 | Green World Leisure Farm | Beipu Township | 121.072648 | 24.699712 | 2 | 
| 167 | Beipu Citian Temple | Beipu Township | 121.058449 | 24.699739 | 2 | 
| 168 | Beipu Township “Farmers Direct Sales Station” | Beipu Township | 121.055402 | 24.70079 | 2 | 
| 169 | Erliao Shenmu | Beipu Township | 121.056389 | 24.702038 | 2 | 
| 170 | Wuzhi Shan Scenic Area | Beipu Township | 121.056389 | 24.702038 | 2 | 
| 171 | Neiwan Old Street | Hengshan Township | 121.1322 | 24.7025 | 2 | 
| 172 | Sharing and glory | Jianshi Township | 121.199393 | 24.70343 | 2 | 
| 173 | Huazhouyuan Puppet Theater | Hengshan Township | 121.180842 | 24.704501 | 2 | 
| 174 | Jianshiyan | Jianshi Township | 121.201251 | 24.705095 | 2 | 
| 175 | Da Ba Jianshan | Jianshi Township | 121.201251 | 24.705095 | 2 | 
| 176 | Aboriginal Cultural Relics Museum of Jianshi Township | Jianshi Township | 121.201251 | 24.705095 | 2 | 
| 177 | Neiwan Station | Hengshan Township | 121.182277 | 24.705331 | 2 | 
| 178 | Xiaojiao’s Cheering Paradise | Hengshan Township | 121.182277 | 24.705331 | 2 | 
| 179 | Riverbank Hot Springs | Hengshan Township | 121.175728 | 24.705483 | 2 | 
| 180 | Water Moon Bay Wonderland | Hengshan Township | 121.180002 | 24.705915 | 2 | 
| 181 | Neiwan Police Station | Hengshan Township | 121.182453 | 24.706254 | 2 | 
| 182 | Neiwan Catholic Church | Hengshan Township | 121.18067 | 24.706336 | 2 | 
| 183 | Guangji Temple | Hengshan Township | 121.181782 | 24.706458 | 2 | 
| 184 | Jack and the Magic Bean | Hengshan Township | 121.169889 | 24.706619 | 2 | 
| 185 | Inner Bay Suspension Bridge | Hengshan Township | 121.180469 | 24.706837 | 2 | 
| 186 | Ancient Trojan Horse Road | Hengshan Township | 121.183028 | 24.707095 | 2 | 
| 187 | Tenren Rock House | Hengshan Township | 121.1665 | 24.7105 | 2 | 
| 188 | Toyota Village, Baishi Lake Bicycle Path | Hengshan Township | 121.166472 | 24.710547 | 2 | 
| 189 | Watermelon Manor Cultural Education Park | Beipu Township | 121.059063 | 24.715161 | 2 | 
| 190 | Watermelon Manor | Beipu Township | 121.059063 | 24.715161 | 2 | 
| 191 | Fengxiang Waterfall Recreation Area | Hengshan Township | 121.142277 | 24.715778 | 2 | 
| 192 | Youluo Valley | Hengshan Township | 121.142277 | 24.715778 | 2 | 
| 193 | Hexin, Hexing, everyone agrees | Hengshan Township | 121.15353 | 24.716795 | 2 | 
| 194 | Hexing Station | Hengshan Township | 121.15353 | 24.716795 | 2 | 
| 195 | Fugui Station | Hengshan Township | 121.15346 | 24.717244 | 2 | 
| 196 | Inspiration Pumping Truck | Hengshan Township | 121.121782 | 24.717573 | 2 | 
| 197 | Cihuitang | Zhudong Township | 121.074723 | 24.721329 | 2 | 
| 198 | Boss Leisure Farm | Hengshan Township | 121.131424 | 24.726749 | 2 | 
| 199 | Shishang Hot Spring | Jianshi Township | 121.222791 | 24.730172 | 2 | 
| 200 | Baoshan Golf Course | Baoshan Township | 120.943582 | 24.73083 | 2 | 
| 201 | Wax Candle Art House | Baoshan Township | 120.960506 | 24.730999 | 2 | 
| 202 | Jianshih Lavender Cottage | Jianshi Township | 121.233957 | 24.733288 | 2 | 
| 203 | Fusha Osaki Trail | Hengshan Township | 121.1658 | 24.735299 | 2 | 
| 204 | Petite Teresa Church | Baoshan Township | 120.9689 | 24.7356 | 2 | 
| 205 | Baoshan Sugar Factory Bicycle Road Line | Baoshan Township | 120.970236 | 24.735987 | 2 | 
| 206 | Wetland farm | Qionglin Township | 121.14539 | 24.736695 | 2 | 
| 207 | Songtao Tianyuan Leisure Farm | Baoshan Township | 121.020534 | 24.736961 | 2 | 
| 208 | Baoshan Reservoir and Baoshan Second Reservoir | Baoshan Township | 121.038856 | 24.738962 | 2 | 
| 209 | Nine Dragon Temple | Baoshan Township | 120.974491 | 24.747297 | 2 | 
| 210 | Xuyang Golf Course | Guanxi Township | 121.183553 | 24.747565 | 2 | 
| 211 | Shahuli Art Village | Baoshan Township | 121.044635 | 24.750122 | 2 | 
| 212 | Lord Guanxi Golf Course | Guanxi Township | 121.197329 | 24.752341 | 2 | 
| 213 | Blonde Pitaya Farm | Guanxi Township | 121.169523 | 24.752877 | 2 | 
| 214 | Double-vitality-hope | Zhudong Township | 121.055347 | 24.765024 | 2 | 
| 215 | Goyulang Tribe | Guanxi Township | 121.241998 | 24.766027 | 2 | 
| 216 | Huashan Leisure Farm | Guanxi Township | 121.178748 | 24.766915 | 2 | 
| 217 | Mountain Creek Golf Course | Guanxi Township | 121.211636 | 24.767379 | 2 | 
| 218 | Zhudong Dazhen | Zhudong Township | 121.056815 | 24.767488 | 2 | 
| 219 | Jin Geum Shan Yimin Temple | Guanxi Township | 121.22436 | 24.767702 | 2 | 
| 220 | Guanxi Bat Cave | Guanxi Township | 121.224211 | 24.767959 | 2 | 
| 221 | Shenjing Village Tea Garden District | Baoshan Township | 120.999394 | 24.76848 | 2 | 
| 222 | Baohu Suspension Bridge. Bihu Suspension Bridge | Baoshan Township | 120.999394 | 24.76848 | 2 | 
| 223 | Geumsan Shiitake Farm | Guanxi Township | 121.229277 | 24.770571 | 2 | 
| 224 | Two monuments at Zhudongtou | Zhudong Township | 121.029867 | 24.780819 | 2 | 
| 225 | Sleepy bear | Zhudong Township | 121.030683 | 24.781257 | 2 | 
| 226 | Li Yi Golf Course | Guanxi Township | 121.190366 | 24.783718 | 2 | 
| 227 | Jin Guangcheng Cultural Center | Guanxi Township | 121.212456 | 24.788457 | 2 | 
| 228 | Xionglin. Six bicycle lanes | Qionglin Township | 121.074692 | 24.790157 | 2 | 
| 229 | Shiniu Mountain Trail | Guanxi Township | 121.253322 | 24.793516 | 2 | 
| 230 | Mercy Farm | Guanxi Township | 121.231258 | 24.798199 | 2 | 
| 231 | Lonely Odoby | Zhubei City | 121.03933 | 24.807568 | 2 | 
| 232 | The birth of new Gila | Zhubei City | 121.03933 | 24.807568 | 2 | 
| 233 | Hsinchu High Speed Rail Station | Zhubei City | 121.040226 | 24.808196 | 2 | 
| 234 | Zhubei Tongdetang | Zhubei City | 121.047616 | 24.809173 | 2 | 
| 235 | Zhubei Liuzhanglilin Family Shrine | Zhubei City | 121.0222 | 24.8107 | 2 | 
| 236 | Zhubei Six Zhangli Doctor | Zhubei City | 121.02444 | 24.810887 | 2 | 
| 237 | Four-sided view | Zhubei City | 121.035146 | 24.811017 | 2 | 
| 238 | Xinwawu Hakka Culture Preservation Area | Zhubei City | 121.026943 | 24.811667 | 2 | 
| 239 | Zhubei Liuzhangli Zhongxiao Hall (No. 13 Dongpingli) | Zhubei City | 121.025204 | 24.811753 | 2 | 
| 240 | Zhubei Liuzhangli asked the auditorium | Zhubei City | 121.02511 | 24.811791 | 2 | 
| 241 | Chubei Quanzhou Chuo Fenyang Hall | Zhubei City | 121.017008 | 24.816685 | 2 | 
| 242 | Bodhi Love | Zhubei City | 121.031998 | 24.820934 | 2 | 
| 243 | Zhubei Stadium | Zhubei City | 121.022673 | 24.821273 | 2 | 
| 244 | Litou Mountain Trail | Xinpu Township | 121.045586 | 24.821301 | 2 | 
| 245 | Zhubei Liuzhangli Zhongxiao Hall (No. 18, Dongpingli) | Zhubei City | 121.0142 | 24.8221 | 2 | 
| 246 | Zhubei County Fuyuan | Zhubei City | 121.015146 | 24.824672 | 2 | 
| 247 | Lianhua Temple | Zhubei City | 121.025643 | 24.825271 | 2 | 
| 248 | Zhubei Lianhua Temple | Zhubei City | 121.025643 | 24.825271 | 2 | 
| 249 | Time story | Zhubei City | 121.01073 | 24.826267 | 2 | 
| 250 | Hsinchu County Government | Zhubei City | 121.0129 | 24.8269 | 2 | 
| 251 | Zhubei Guangming Commercial District | Zhubei City | 121.019572 | 24.828918 | 2 | 
| 252 | Collection, Fenghua | Zhubei City | 121.012496 | 24.830096 | 2 | 
| 253 | Hsinchu County Art Museum | Zhubei City | 121.012496 | 24.830096 | 2 | 
| 254 | Hsinchu County History Museum | Zhubei City | 121.012496 | 24.830096 | 2 | 
| 255 | Hsinchu County History Museum | Zhubei City | 121.012496 | 24.830096 | 2 | 
| 256 | Dingfeng Bee Farm | Zhubei City | 120.992908 | 24.833797 | 2 | 
| 257 | Li Longquan Multi-art Space | Zhubei City | 120.986656 | 24.836262 | 2 | 
| 258 | Niupu Creek‧Mangrove Scenic Area | Zhubei City | 120.948543 | 24.851247 | 2 | 
| 259 | Tokai Organic Lime Garden | Zhubei City | 120.947401 | 24.853197 | 2 | 
| 260 | Guize Mountain Trail | Wufeng Township | 121.123057 | 24.614147 | 1 | 
| 261 | Wufeng Liangshan Camping Area | Wufeng Township | 121.102357 | 24.615732 | 1 | 
| 262 | Saixia Basdaai Festival | Wufeng Township | 121.0994 | 24.6225 | 1 | 
| 263 | Guyan Waterfall | Wufeng Township | 121.12403 | 24.624802 | 1 | 
| 264 | Bamboo Forest Health Village Cooperative | Wufeng Township | 121.120559 | 24.625633 | 1 | 
| 265 | Maibari tribe | Wufeng Township | 121.120672 | 24.625933 | 1 | 
| 266 | Fairy Lake Camping Area | Wufeng Township | 121.116313 | 24.626549 | 1 | 
| 267 | Shengying Farm and Aboriginal Rattan Weaving | Wufeng Township | 121.143845 | 24.631032 | 1 | 
| 268 | Qingquan Scenery Area | Wufeng Township | 121.119632 | 24.632065 | 1 | 
| 269 | Bailan Tribe | Wufeng Township | 121.119632 | 24.632065 | 1 | 
| 270 | Heping Tribe Recreational Agriculture Area | Wufeng Township | 121.119632 | 24.632065 | 1 | 
| 271 | Saixia Dwarf Spirit Festival | Wufeng Township | 121.119632 | 24.632065 | 1 | 
| 272 | Meihouman Waterfall | Wufeng Township | 121.157475 | 24.649665 | 1 | 
| 273 | Wan Fo An | Emei Township | 121.02287 | 24.65199 | 1 | 
| 274 | Shuilian Bridge Trail | Emei Township | 121.024447 | 24.655557 | 1 | 
| 275 | Lion Mountain Trail | Emei Township | 121.024447 | 24.655557 | 1 | 
| 276 | Tianhu Farm | Jianshi Township | 121.179965 | 24.668714 | 1 | 
| 277 | Song Yunxuan Coffee House | Emei Township | 120.991693 | 24.668766 | 1 | 
| 278 | Plum Blossom Villa | Jianshi Township | 121.195189 | 24.674083 | 1 | 
| 279 | Shiliiao Leisure Agricultural Park | Emei Township | 120.986031 | 24.675063 | 1 | 
| 280 | Emei Lake, Twelve Liao, Shishan Visitor Center Bicycle Path | Emei Township | 120.985319 | 24.6794 | 1 | 
| 281 | Little Raindrop Art Space | Emei Township | 120.974407 | 24.688101 | 1 | 
| 282 | Emei Fuxing Tea Factory (including the House of Lu Kingdom and Zeng Zhengzhang) | Emei Township | 120.971711 | 24.688161 | 1 | 
| 283 | Shen Dongning Studio | Emei Township | 121.0094 | 24.6909 | 1 | 
| 284 | Fuxing Tea Exhibition Center | Emei Township | 120.986019 | 24.69716 | 1 | 
| 285 | Dance of Youth | Emei Township | 120.998063 | 24.715319 | 1 | 
| 286 | Fengcheng Charcoal Kiln (House of Charcoal) | Baoshan Township | 120.997016 | 24.721236 | 1 | 
| 287 | Dongkeng Xinfeng Temple | Baoshan Township | 120.980247 | 24.722726 | 1 | 
| 288 | Sanfeng Farmers’ Orchard | Baoshan Township | 120.997522 | 24.724663 | 1 | 
| 289 | Dongkeng Bogong Temple | Baoshan Township | 120.985804 | 24.731756 | 1 | 
| 290 | Nun temple | Baoshan Township | 120.977819 | 24.750516 | 1 | 
| 291 | Baosheng Temple | Baoshan Township | 121.009258 | 24.750518 | 1 | 
| 292 | Sunfull Temple | Baoshan Township | 120.990303 | 24.765395 | 1 | 
| 293 | Baoshan Ecological Farm Pond | Baoshan Township | 120.991274 | 24.765525 | 1 | 
| 294 | Baxian Waterfall | Wufeng Township | 121.095289 | 24.534444 | 0 | 
| 295 | Cinsbus Giant Trees | Jianshi Township | 121.296087 | 24.54063 | 0 | 
| 296 | Town West Fort Church | Jianshi Township | 121.3024 | 24.5731 | 0 | 
| 297 | Huang Guanglai Greenhouse Honey Peach Garden (Duanmu Mushroom Garden) | Jianshi Township | 121.301585 | 24.573782 | 0 | 
| 298 | Sanmao Residence | Wufeng Township | 121.105808 | 24.573931 | 0 | 
| 299 | Qingquan Hot Spring | Wufeng Township | 121.105564 | 24.574473 | 0 | 
| 300 | Taoshan Elementary School | Wufeng Township | 121.106182 | 24.57514 | 0 | 
| 301 | Leha Mountain Farm Camping Area | Wufeng Township | 121.0799 | 24.5753 | 0 | 
| 302 | Guanwu National Forest Recreation Area | Wufeng Township | 121.113756 | 24.575489 | 0 | 
| 303 | Qingquan Catholic Church | Wufeng Township | 121.10381 | 24.576976 | 0 | 
| 304 | Yuanyang Lake Natural Ecological Conservation Area | Jianshi Township | 121.406221 | 24.577652 | 0 | 
| 305 | People have sculpture park | Wufeng Township | 121.107493 | 24.579401 | 0 | 
| 306 | Bailan Leisure Agriculture Area | Wufeng Township | 121.087456 | 24.579457 | 0 | 
| 307 | Xinguang Tribe | Jianshi Township | 121.3032 | 24.5799 | 0 | 
| 308 | Xiweng Waterfall | Wufeng Township | 121.1481323 | 24.5915394 | 0 | 
| 309 | Taoshan Tunnel | Wufeng Township | 121.108272 | 24.600923 | 0 | 
| 310 | Tianyue Farm | Wufeng Township | 121.095966 | 24.603535 | 0 | 
| 311 | Shanshang Renjia Leisure Farm | Wufeng Township | 121.089037 | 24.604624 | 0 | 
| 312 | Liying Mountain Trail | Jianshi Township | 121.3338 | 24.6526 | 0 | 
| 313 | Jianshi TAPUNG Castle (Li Wei Aiyong Supervision Office) | Jianshi Township | 121.322805 | 24.660641 | 0 | 
| 314 | Jinmei Suspension Bridge | Jianshi Township | 121.207775 | 24.670304 | 0 | 
| 315 | Natural Valley Hot Spring | Jianshi Township | 121.2696 | 24.6718 | 0 | 
| 316 | Secret Garden Coffee Garden | Jianshi Township | 121.251724 | 24.677793 | 0 | 
| 317 | Shanqing Leisure Farm | Jianshi Township | 121.21037 | 24.678877 | 0 | 
| 318 | Naluowan Leisure Farm | Jianshi Township | 121.243623 | 24.679272 | 0 | 
| 319 | Luoxing Trout Leisure Farm | Jianshi Township | 121.236604 | 24.679805 | 0 | 
| 320 | Hengshan and Ulao Bicycle Paths | Jianshi Township | 121.247229 | 24.680325 | 0 | 
| 321 | Jinping Church | Jianshi Township | 121.2287 | 24.6977 | 0 | 
| 322 | Jinping Park | Jianshi Township | 121.218639 | 24.698443 | 0 | 
| 323 | Linghai Mountain Forest Leisure Farm | Jianshi Township | 121.2831 | 24.7065 | 0 | 
| 324 | Bu Lao Ju Leisure Farm | Jianshi Township | 121.2693 | 24.7135 | 0 | 
| 325 | Lao Liu Orchard in Bawu Mountain | Jianshi Township | 121.279338 | 24.716784 | 0 | 
| 326 | Bali Forest Hot Spring Resort | Jianshi Township | 121.235676 | 24.721937 | 0 | 
| 327 | Paddy field camp | Jianshi Township | 121.259345 | 24.734987 | 0 | 
References
- Kim, K.-H.; Kabir, E.; Kabir, S. A review on the human health impact of airborne particulate matter. Environ. Int. 2015, 74, 136–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 - Cheriyan, D.; Hyun, K.Y.; Jaegoo, H.; Choi, J.-H. Assessing the distributional characteristics of PM10, PM2.5, and PM1 exposure profile produced and propagated from a construction activity. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 276, 124335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Yu, H.-L.; Lin, Y.-C.; Kuo, Y.-M. A time series analysis of multiple ambient pollutants to investigate the underlying air pollution dynamics and interactions. Chemosphere 2015, 134, 571–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 - Yu, H.-L.; Lin, Y.-C.; Sivakumar, B.; Kuo, Y.-M. A study of the temporal dynamics of ambient particulate matter using stochastic and chaotic techniques. Atmospheric Environ. 2013, 69, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Wu, Y.; Lin, Y.; Yu, H.; Chen, J.; Chen, T.; Sun, Y.; Wen, L.; Yip, P.; Chu, Y.; Chen, Y. Association between air pollutants and dementia risk in the elderly. Alzheimer’s Dement. Diagn. Assess. Dis. Monit. 2015, 1, 220–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Lippmann, M. Toxicological and epidemiological studies of cardiovascular effects of ambient air fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and its chemical components: Coherence and public health implications. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 2014, 44, 299–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - WHO Ambient (Outdoor) Air Pollution. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ambient-(outdoor)-air-quality-and-health (accessed on 23 November 2020).
 - Chen, J.; Wang, X.; ScD, G.A.W.; Serre, M.L.; Driscoll, I.; Casanova, R.; McArdle, J.J.; Manson, J.E.; Chui, H.C.; Espeland, M.A. Ambient air pollution and neurotoxicity on brain structure: Evidence from women’s health initiative memory study. Ann. Neurol. 2015, 78, 466–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Kioumourtzoglou, M.-A.; Schwartz, J.D.; Weisskopf, M.G.; Melly, S.J.; Wang, Y.; Dominici, F.; Zanobetti, A. Long-term PM 2.5 Exposure and Neurological HospitalAdmissions in the Northeastern United States. Environ. Heal. Perspect. 2016, 124, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Chen, H.; Kwong, J.C.; Copes, R.; Hystad, P.; Van Donkelaar, A.; Tu, K.; Brook, J.R.; Goldberg, M.S.; Martin, R.V.; Murray, B.J.; et al. Exposure to ambient air pollution and the incidence of dementia: A population-based cohort study. Environ. Int. 2017, 108, 271–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 - Peters, R.; Ee, N.; Peters, J.; Booth, A.; Mudway, I.; Anstey, K.J. Air Pollution and Dementia: A Systematic Review. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2019, 70, S145–S163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 - Li, T.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J.; Xu, D.; Yin, Z.; Chen, H.-S.; Lv, Y.; Luo, J.; Zeng, Y.; Liu, Y.; et al. All-cause mortality risk associated with long-term exposure to ambient PM2·5 in China: a cohort study. Lancet Public Heal. 2018, 3, e470–e477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Amoatey, P.; Sicard, P.; De Marco, A.; Khaniabadi, Y.O. Long-term exposure to ambient PM2.5 and impacts on health in Rome, Italy. Clin. Epidemiology Glob. Heal. 2020, 8, 531–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Faridi, S.; Shamsipour, M.; Krzyzanowski, M.; Künzli, N.; Amini, H.; Azimi, F.; Malkawi, M.; Momeniha, F.; Gholampour, A.; Hassanvand, M.S.; et al. Long-term trends and health impact of PM2.5 and O3 in Tehran, Iran, 2006–2015. Environ. Int. 2018, 114, 37–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 - Wang, S.; Zhou, C.; Wang, Z.; Feng, K.; Hubacek, K. The characteristics and drivers of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) distribution in China. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 142, 1800–1809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Liang, F.; Xiao, Q.; Gu, D.; Xu, M.; Tian, L.; Guo, Q.; Wu, Z.; Pan, X.; Liu, Y. Satellite-based short- and long-term exposure to PM2.5 and adult mortality in urban Beijing, China. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 242, 492–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 - Chen, Y.-C.; Chiang, H.-C.; Hsu, C.-Y.; Yang, T.-T.; Lin, T.-Y.; Chen, M.-J.; Chen, N.-T.; Wu, Y.-S. Ambient PM2.5-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Changhua County, central Taiwan: Seasonal variation, source apportionment and cancer risk assessment. Environ. Pollut. 2016, 218, 372–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Tseng, Y.-L.; Yuan, C.-S.; Bagtasa, G.; Chuang, H.-L.; Li, T.-C. Inter-correlation of Chemical Compositions, Transport Routes, and Source Apportionment Results of Atmospheric PM2.5 in Southern Taiwan and the Northern Philippines. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2019, 9, 2645–2661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Lu, H.-Y.; Wu, Y.-L.; Mutuku, J.K.; Chang, K.-H. Various Sources of PM2.5 and their Impact on the Air Quality in Tainan City, Taiwan. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2019, 19, 601–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Flood vulnerability and risk maps in Taipei City, Taiwan. Compr. Flood Risk Manag. 2012. [CrossRef]
 - Doong, D.-J.; Lo, W.; Vojinovic, Z.; Lee, W.-L.; Lee, S.-P. Development of a New Generation of Flood Inundation Maps—A Case Study of the Coastal City of Tainan, Taiwan. Water 2016, 8, 521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Lee, D.-H.; Ku, C.-S.; Yuan, H. A study of the liquefaction risk potential at Yuanlin, Taiwan. Eng. Geol. 2004, 71, 97–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Wang, M.-H.; Chen, M.-H.; Loh, C.-H. Liquefaction Potential Study of Taiwan. In Proceedings of the World Conferences on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zeland, 30 January–4 February 2000. [Google Scholar]
 - Hsiao, D.H.; Zheng, Z.-Y. Simplified Empirical Method for Predicting Liquefaction Potential and Its Application to Kaohsiung Areas in Taiwan. Int. J. Geotech. Geolog. Eng. 2019, 13, 482–490. [Google Scholar]
 - Zheng, Y.; Chen, X.; Jin, Q.; Chen, Y.; Qu, X.; Liu, X.; Chang, E.; Ma, W.-Y.; Rui, Y.; Sun, W. A cloud-based knowledge discovery system for monitoring fine-grained air quality. Available online: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/UAir20Demo.pdf (accessed on 23 November 2020).
 - Hsieh, H.-P.; Lin, S.-D.; Zheng, Y. Inferring Air Quality for Station Location Recommendation Based on Urban Big Data. In Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 10–15 August 2015; pp. 437–446. [Google Scholar]
 - Yuan, M.; Song, Y.; Huang, Y.; Hong, S.; Huang, L. Exploring the Association between Urban Form and Air Quality in China. J. Plan. Educ. Res. 2017, 38, 413–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Zheng, Y.; Liu, F.; Hsieh, H.-P. U-Air: When urban air quality inference meets big data. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Chicago, IL, USA, 11–14 August 2013; pp. 1436–1444. [Google Scholar]
 - Yu, R.; Yang, Y.; Yang, L.; Han, G.; Move, O.A. RAQ–A Random Forest Approach for Predicting Air Quality in Urban Sensing Systems. Sensors 2016, 16, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 - Gao, Y.; Dong, W.; Guo, K.; Liu, X.; Chen, Y.; Liu, X.; Bu, J.; Chen, C. Mosaic: A low-cost mobile sensing system for urban air quality monitoring. In Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM 2016—The 35th Annual IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications, San Francisco, CA, USA, 10–14 April 2016; pp. 1–9. [Google Scholar]
 - Wu, Z.; Liu, F.; Fan, W. Characteristics of PM10 and PM2.5 at Mount Wutai Buddhism Scenic Spot, Shanxi, China. Atmosphere 2015, 6, 1195–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Shi, J.; Gao, H.; Cheng, H.; Sun, H.; Huang, D. Study on the exposure risk based on the PM2.5 pollution characteristics of POIs and their attractiveness to the crowd. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. Int. J. 2020, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Yang, T.-T.; Hsu, C.-Y.; Chen, Y.-C.; Young, L.-H.; Huang, C.-H.; Ku, C.-H. Characteristics, Sources, and Health Risks of Atmospheric PM2.5-Bound Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Hsinchu, Taiwan. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2017, 17, 563–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Chang, S.; Tu, W.; Chiu, H.-M. The silence of silicon lambs: speaking out health and environmental impacts within Taiwan’s hsinchu science-based industrial park. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, 2004. Conference Record. 2004, Scottsdale, AZ, USA, 10–13 May 2004; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE): Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2004; pp. 10–13. [Google Scholar]
 - Nian, H.-C.; Liu, H.-W.; Wu, B.-Z.; Chang, C.-C.; Chiu, K.-H.; Lo, J.-G. Impact of inclement weather on the characteristics of volatile organic compounds in ambient air at the Hsinchu Science Park in Taiwan. Sci. Total. Environ. 2008, 399, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Chein, H.; Hsu, Y.-D.; Aggarwal, S.G.; Chen, T.-M.; Huang, C.-C. Evaluation of arsenical emission from semiconductor and opto-electronics facilities in Hsinchu, Taiwan. Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40, 1901–1907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Chen, S.; Cowan, C.; Grant, P. Orthogonal least squares learning algorithm for radial basis function networks. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 1991, 2, 302–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Orr, M.J. Introduction to Radial Basis Function Networks; Center for Cognitive Science, University of Edinburgh: Edinburgh, Scotland, 1996. [Google Scholar]
 - Park, J.; Sandberg, I.W. Approximation and Radial-Basis-Function Networks. Neural Comput. 1993, 5, 305–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Chuang, M.-T.; Chou, C.C.-K.; Lin, N.-H.; Takami, A.; Hsiao, T.-C.; Lin, T.-H.; Fu, J.S.; Pani, S.K.; Lu, Y.-R.; Yang, T.-Y. A Simulation Study on PM2.5 Sources and Meteorological Characteristics at the Northern tip of Taiwan in the Early Stage of the Asian Haze Period. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2017, 17, 3166–3178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Cheng, F.-Y.; Hsu, C.-H. Long-term variations in PM2.5 concentrations under changing meteorological conditions in Taiwan. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 - Hsu, C.-H.; Cheng, F.-Y. Classification of weather patterns to study the influence of meteorological characteristics on PM2.5 concentrations in Yunlin County, Taiwan. Atmos. Environ. 2016, 144, 397–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Lu, H.-C.; Chang, C.-L.; Hsieh, J.-C. Classification of PM10 distributions in Taiwan. Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40, 1452–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Hsu, C.-H.; Cheng, F.-Y. Synoptic Weather Patterns and Associated Air Pollution in Taiwan. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2019, 19, 1139–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Lin, C.; Liu, S.; Chou, C.; Huang, S.; Liu, C.; Kuo, C.; Young, C. Long-range transport of aerosols and their impact on the air quality of Taiwan. Atmos. Environ. 2005, 39, 6066–6076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Fang, S.-H.; Chen, H.-W. Air quality and pollution control in Taiwan. Atmos. Environ. 1996, 30, 735–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Lai, H.-C.; Lin, M.-C. Characteristics of the upstream flow patterns during PM2.5 pollution events over a complex island topography. Atmos. Environ. 2020, 227, 117418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Lee, M.; Lin, L.; Chen, C.-Y.; Tsao, Y.; Yao, T.-H.; Fei, M.-H.; Fang, S.-H. Forecasting Air Quality in Taiwan by Using Machine Learning. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Kikaj, D.; Chambers, S.D.; Kobal, M.; Crawford, J.; Vaupotič, J. Characterizing atmospheric controls on winter urban pollution in a topographic basin setting using Radon-222. Atmos. Res. 2020, 237, 104838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Zhang, L.; Guo, X.; Zhao, T.; Gong, S.; Xu, X.; Li, Y.; Luo, L.; Gui, K.; Wang, H.; Zheng, Y.; et al. A modelling study of the terrain effects on haze pollution in the Sichuan Basin. Atmos. Environ. 2019, 196, 77–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Yang, Q.; Yuan, Q.; Yue, L.; Li, T. Investigation of the spatially varying relationships of PM2.5 with meteorology, topography, and emissions over China in 2015 by using modified geographically weighted regression. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 262, 114257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 - Han, S.; Sun, B. Impact of population density on PM2.5 concentrations: A case study in Shanghai, China. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Han, S.; Sun, B.; Zhang, T. Mono- and polycentric urban spatial structure and PM2.5 concentrations: Regarding the dependence on population density. Habitat Int. 2020, 104, 102257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.  | 
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).