Next Article in Journal
Emerging Natural Focal Infectious Diseases in Russia: A Medical–Geographical Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Adolescent Participation in Research, Policies and Guidelines for Chronic Disease Prevention: A Scoping Review Protocol
Previous Article in Journal
Occupational Performance Coaching with Parents to Promote Community Participation and Quality of Life of Young Children with Developmental Disabilities: A Feasibility Evaluation in Hong Kong
Previous Article in Special Issue
Elements of Effective Population Surveillance Systems for Monitoring Obesity in School Aged Children
Article

Healthy Living and Co-Production: Evaluation of Processes and Outcomes of a Health Promotion Initiative Co-Produced with Adolescents

1
Management and Healthcare Laboratory-Institute of Management and Department EMbeDS, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, 56127 Pisa, Italy
2
Department of Economics, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(21), 8007; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218007
Received: 31 August 2020 / Revised: 9 October 2020 / Accepted: 27 October 2020 / Published: 30 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Obesity Prevention and Intervention in Children and Adolescents)
Co-production is an approach to designing, delivering, and evaluating public services through strict collaboration among professionals and the people using services with an equal and reciprocal relationship. Health promotion initiatives that include education services rarely use the co-production approach. Nevertheless, the value of co-production is widely recognized, although it is considered a normative good, and scarce and mixed evidence is available in literature. The purpose of this paper is to provide evidence supporting the hypothesis that a co-production approach, applied to an intervention for preventing obesity, can be effective and efficient. To this end, an evaluation of the processes, outputs meant as intermediate results, and behavioral and economic outcomes of a public health-promotion initiative co-produced and co-delivered with adolescents (beFood) was conducted. Mixed methods were used, including field-observations, two self-reported questionnaires, and an opportunity–cost analysis that compared beFood to traditional approaches of public health promotion. The co-production model was successfully implemented and appears to be effective—more than 5000 adolescents were reached by only 49 co-producer adolescents, who reported behavioral changes (e.g., eating better and practicing more physical activity). The cost analysis showed that the co-production approach was also efficient, producing relevant savings and potentially making available more than 3000 h of professionals’ time. This research can support a re-thinking of public institutions’ organization, public initiatives’ design, and public servants’ role. View Full-Text
Keywords: obesity prevention; health promotion; adolescents; co-production; evaluation; opportunity–cost; public value obesity prevention; health promotion; adolescents; co-production; evaluation; opportunity–cost; public value
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

De Rosis, S.; Pennucci, F.; Noto, G.; Nuti, S. Healthy Living and Co-Production: Evaluation of Processes and Outcomes of a Health Promotion Initiative Co-Produced with Adolescents. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 8007. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218007

AMA Style

De Rosis S, Pennucci F, Noto G, Nuti S. Healthy Living and Co-Production: Evaluation of Processes and Outcomes of a Health Promotion Initiative Co-Produced with Adolescents. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(21):8007. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218007

Chicago/Turabian Style

De Rosis, Sabina, Francesca Pennucci, Guido Noto, and Sabina Nuti. 2020. "Healthy Living and Co-Production: Evaluation of Processes and Outcomes of a Health Promotion Initiative Co-Produced with Adolescents" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 21: 8007. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218007

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop