Next Article in Journal
Antifungal Effect of Henna against Candida albicans Adhered to Acrylic Resin as a Possible Method for Prevention of Denture Stomatitis
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of Heat Stress and the Indoor Climate Control Requirements for Movable Refuge Chambers
Open AccessArticle

Geographic Clustering of Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Metropolitan Centres in France and Australia

1
Centre for Population Health Research, School of Health Sciences, Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide SA 5001, Australia
2
Research Center of the Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montréal, QC H4H 1R3, Canada
3
Inserm, UMR-S 1136, Pierre Louis Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, Nemesis Team, Paris 75012, France
4
Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR-S 1136, Pierre Louis Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, Nemesis Team, Paris 75012, France
5
Discipline of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide SA 5001, Australia
6
Centre d’Investigations Préventives et Cliniques, Paris 75116, France
7
Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, St Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne, Fitzroy VIC 3065, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Paul B. Tchounwou
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13(5), 519; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13050519
Received: 29 February 2016 / Revised: 22 April 2016 / Accepted: 16 May 2016 / Published: 21 May 2016
Understanding how health outcomes are spatially distributed represents a first step in investigating the scale and nature of environmental influences on health and has important implications for statistical power and analytic efficiency. Using Australian and French cohort data, this study aimed to describe and compare the extent of geographic variation, and the implications for analytic efficiency, across geographic units, countries and a range of cardiometabolic parameters (Body Mass Index (BMI) waist circumference, blood pressure, resting heart rate, triglycerides, cholesterol, glucose, HbA1c). Geographic clustering was assessed using Intra-Class Correlation (ICC) coefficients in biomedical cohorts from Adelaide (Australia, n = 3893) and Paris (France, n = 6430) for eight geographic administrative units. The median ICC was 0.01 suggesting 1% of risk factor variance attributable to variation between geographic units. Clustering differed by cardiometabolic parameters, administrative units and countries and was greatest for BMI and resting heart rate in the French sample, HbA1c in the Australian sample, and for smaller geographic units. Analytic inefficiency due to clustering was greatest for geographic units in which participants were nested in fewer, larger geographic units. Differences observed in geographic clustering across risk factors have implications for choice of geographic unit in sampling and analysis, and highlight potential cross-country differences in the distribution, or role, of environmental features related to cardiometabolic health. View Full-Text
Keywords: Intra-Class Correlation; cross-country comparison; geographic clustering; geographic variation; cardiometabolic risk factors Intra-Class Correlation; cross-country comparison; geographic clustering; geographic variation; cardiometabolic risk factors
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Paquet, C.; Chaix, B.; Howard, N.J.; Coffee, N.T.; Adams, R.J.; Taylor, A.W.; Thomas, F.; Daniel, M. Geographic Clustering of Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Metropolitan Centres in France and Australia. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13, 519.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map

1
Back to TopTop