Next Article in Journal
Bioactivity of Fucoidan-Rich Extracts from Fucus vesiculosus against Rotavirus and Foodborne Pathogens
Next Article in Special Issue
OSMAC Method to Assess Impact of Culture Parameters on Metabolomic Diversity and Biological Activity of Marine-Derived Actinobacteria
Previous Article in Journal
The Preventive Mechanism of Anserine on Tert-Butyl Hydroperoxide-Induced Liver Injury in L-02 Cells via Regulating the Keap1-Nrf2 and JNK-Caspase-3 Signaling Pathways
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Marine Drugs
Volume 21
Issue 9
10.3390/md21090476
marinedrugs-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Kocuria flava, a Bacterial Endophyte of the Marine Macroalga Bryopsis plumosa, Emits 8-Nonenoic Acid Which Inhibits the Aquaculture Pathogen Saprolegnia parasitica

by
Ynon Deutsch
1,2,
Mohamed Samara
3,
Ahmed Nasser
3,
Ilana Berman-Frank
2 and
David Ezra
1,*
1
Department of Plant Pathology and Weed Research, The Volcani Institute, Agricultural Research Organization, Rishon LeZion 7528809, Israel
2
Leon H. Charney School of Marine Sciences, Department of Marine Biology, University of Haifa, Haifa 3103301, Israel
3
The Inter-Institutional Analytical Instrumentation Unit (IU), The Volcani Institute, Agricultural Research Organization, Rishon LeZion 7528809, Israel
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mar. Drugs 2023, 21(9), 476; https://doi.org/10.3390/md21090476
Submission received: 13 July 2023 / Revised: 22 August 2023 / Accepted: 23 August 2023 / Published: 29 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diversity of Marine Microorganisms as a Source of Bioactive Natural Products)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Secondary metabolites—organic compounds that are often bioactive—produced by endophytes, among others, provide a selective advantage by increasing the organism’s survivability. Secondary metabolites mediate the symbiotic relationship between endophytes and their host, potentially providing the host with tolerance to, and protection against biotic and abiotic stressors. Secondary metabolites can be secreted as a dissolved substance or emitted as a volatile. In a previous study, we isolated bioactive endophytes from several macroalgae and tested them in vitro for their ability to inhibit major disease-causing pathogens of aquatic animals in the aquaculture industry. One endophyte (isolate Abp5, K. flava) inhibited and killed, in vitro, the pathogen Saprolegnia parasitica, an oomycete that causes saprolegniasis—a disease affecting a wide range of aquatic animals. Here, using analytical chemistry tools, we found that Abp5 produces the volatile organic compound (VOC) 8-nonenoic acid. Once we confirmed the production of this compound by the endophyte, we tested the compound’s ability to treat S. parasitica in in vitro and in vivo bioassays. In the latter, we found that 5 mg/L of the compound improves the survival of larvae challenged with S. parasitica by 54.5%. Our isolation and characterization of the VOC emitted by the endophytic K. flava establish the groundwork for future studies of endophytic biocontrol agents from macroalgae. Use of this compound could enable managing oomycete agricultural pathogens in general, and S. parasitica in particular, a major causal agent in aquaculture diseases.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Endophytes are microorganisms, mostly fungi and bacteria that inhabit the inner plant tissue; they can be found in all plants in nature [1]. They form a mutualistic relationship with the plant host which provides the endophyte with a living niche and food, while the endophyte provides tolerance to, and protection against biotic and abiotic stressors. Endophytes have been found to secrete specialized metabolites that contribute to their survival in hostile environments [2,3], termed secondary metabolites. Secondary metabolites can be categorized into various chemical groups: alkaloids, flavonoids, phenolic acids, fatty acids, quinones, steroids, alcohols, tannins, terpenoids, ketones, xanthones, and many others [4]. Endophytes use their secondary metabolites as antifungals, antibacterial, antivirals and antioxidants [5,6,7], as part of their defense against competitors. As a side effect, those metabolites benefit the host plant by protecting them against pests and other stressors. Some of those secondary metabolites are also known for their pharmaceutical properties (i.e., as anticarcinogens, anti-inflammatories, antiarthritics, antidiabetics, and immunosuppressants [4,8]).
Endophytes comprise many phyla. For example, Actinobacteria—gram-positive bacteria, many of which are producers of medicinal antibiotics—can be found in terrestrial and aquatic environments [5,9,10,11]. One such actinomycete is K. flava, first described by Zhou et al. (2008) as yellow, aerobic, non-motile and coccoid cells. It can be found in many environments, such as air [12], soil, plants [13,14], roots [15], marine sediment [16], sponges [17] and algae [18,19]. K. flava is known for its versatile abilities, showing methanol catalytic activity, thermotolerance, antifouling activity, chromate tolerance, plant growth induction and more [15,19,20]. We previously isolated K. flava, isolate ABp5, as an endophyte from the marine macroalga Bryopsis plumosa [18]. B. plumosa is a seaweed of the phylum Chlorophyta. Bryopsis sp. is known for their ability to attract, select, and maintain specific endophytes within their cells; they use these endophytes for wound repair and propagation in the face of biotic stresses [21].
In our previous study, we isolated seven different endophytes from B. plumosa, all of them were found to be biologically active against aquaculture pathogens. K. flava isolate ABp5 was active against S. parasitica in in vitro assays [18]. S. parasitica is an oomycete (water mold) causing saprolegniasis, a disease affecting freshwater fish eggs and juvenile fish in hatcheries worldwide. In mature fish, it is characterized by visible white or gray patches of filamentous mycelium on the body or fins. Saprolegnia infections were previously controlled with Malachite green, but since this compound was banned internationally in 2002, this oomycete has become a serious problem in the aquaculture industry, mainly of catfish (Ictalurus spp.), salmon (Salmo spp.), and trout species [22,23].
Aquaculture is the fastest growing food industry. The increasing demand for healthy animal-sourced protein and a rapidly growing economy have resulted in an annual growth rate of 5.8% for the aquaculture industry since 2001 [24]. The salmon farming industry has grown exponentially in the last three decades, with Norway and Chile as the major suppliers. This industry holds a 4.5% of the world’s aquaculture industry with fish yield of 2.5 million tons in 2018. It has become an integral part of the global aquaculture market due to its large economic share. It is estimated that 10% of all hatched salmon die due to Saprolegnia infections, causing major financial losses for this industry [23,25,26].
In this study, we isolated and identified an active compound from the endophytic bacterium K. flava. The compound was tested for bioactivity against the aquaculture pathogen S. parasitica by both in vitro and in vivo bioassays, demonstrating potential for using as a control agent for one of the major diseases in the world aquaculture industry today.

2. Results

2.1. Bioactivity Assays

The endophytic isolate ABp5 fully inhibited S. parasitica in an antibiosis test performed on synthetic solid growth medium in a closed petri dish (Figure 1B). This activity was not obtained when we cultured the isolate in liquid medium followed by liquid/liquid chloroform crude extraction of the secreted secondary metabolites. We therefore assumed that the active metabolites are volatiles and not secreted into the media. To examine this assumption, we performed an assay designed to evaluate volatile activity, using a two-compartment petri dish that allows the volatiles emitted by the bacteria, but not the secreted metabolites, to migrate into the oomycete chamber. Full inhibition of the pathogen was observed, restoring the endophyte activity that we had observed in the solid medium bioassays (Figure 1A). S. parasitica plugs from both the solid antibiosis and volatile two-compartment assays were examined for viability. In both cases, the pathogens transferred onto a plate with fresh medium without the endophyte, were dead (Figure 1C).

2.2. VOC Identification

To further understand the basis of ABp5′s bioactivity, we chemically analyzed the gas phase of the endophyte grown on NPDA agar slant by GC–MS. Table 1 presents the 10 different suggested compounds identified by GC–MS (see Table S1 for additional information). These compounds belonged to the ketone, alcohol, phenol, fatty acid and ester families. Nine of them were commercially available (oxime-, methoxy-phenyl-_ was not available).

2.2.1. Testing Standards for Bioactivity against S. parasitica

All nine purchased compounds were examined for their ability to inhibit the growth of S. parasitica. 8-nonenoic acid (Figure 2, on the left) was the only to demonstrate strong growth inhibition, with 100 μg of 8-nonenoic acid causing an inhibition zone of 17–21 mm on agar plates. Ethanol as a control did not cause inhibition, moreover it can be seen that the oomycote is growing towards it (Figure 2 on the right).

2.2.2. 8-Nonenoic Acid Identification by GC Comparison

A second method to test the identity of the active compound as 8-nonenoic acid was based on comparing the retention times of the endophytic volatile and the standard on a GC column. The standard’s retention time (Figure 3A, 14.762 min) and fragmentation (41, 55, 60, 69, 73, 96, 114, 123, 138 m/z) (Figure 3B) were identical to the endophyte’s product.

2.3. In Vitro 8-Nonenoic Acid Concentration Bioassay

The growth radius of S. parasitica mycelium in water + Potato Dextrose Broth (PDB) only (control) was smaller than on agar (5 and 25 mm, respectively). To compare the two types of medium, we calculated the percentage of S. parasitica growth compared to the relevant control (Figure 4). No inhibition of S. parasitica growth was recorded when 0.1, 0.5, 1 or 2.5 μg/mL 8-nonenoic acid was added in the agar assay, whereas a significant decrease in S. parasitica growth was recorded in water for concentrations of 0.5–2.5 μg/mL. Full inhibition was recorded in water at 2.5 μg/mL and above. On the other hand, on agar medium, inhibition of the pathogen was observed only at 5 μg/mL 8-nonenoic acid and above. Reduction of growth on agar continued to full inhibition at 20 μg/mL. We found a significant difference between solid and liquid media for 8-nonenoic acid concentrations of 0.5, 1, 2.5, 5 and 7.5 μg/mL (p = 0.0284, 0.0027, <0.001, 0.001 and 0.0064, respectively). In this range, the pathogen was greatly inhibited in liquid media but not, or only barely inhibited in solid media. Viability assays were performed on the fully and partially inhibited S. parasitica plugs from both water and solid assays on new media plates. From the solid assay, loss of viability was achieved only with 20 μg/mL 8-nonenoic acid. Loss of viability of plugs from the liquid assay was demonstrated at as low as 0.5 μg/mL 8-nonenoic acid.

2.4. In Vivo Influence of 8-Nonenoic Acid on Tilapia Eggs Challenged with S. parasitica

The survival of tilapia eggs/larvae challenged with S. parasitica in the presence of 8-nonenoic acid was examined in in vivo bioassays. We performed a preliminary assay to find the lowest effective concentration of 8-nonenoic acid on S. parasitica that we could use in the tilapia egg bioassays. We did not find any additive effect when adding 7.5, 10 or 15 mg/L to the flasks compared to 5 mg/L. We did find a reduction in larvae’s survival when it was treated with 1 mg/L 8-nonenoic acid, a survival rate of 27%. The assays were initiated on eggs that were 4 days postfertilization. At this time point, the eggs have already started to develop but are still a few days before hatching. We evaluated the number of hatched larvae 5 days post-inoculation with the pathogen. The control treatment (eggs with ethanol only) showed 100% survival and proper development of the larvae (Figure 5 and Figure 6A). Within 2 days of adding S. parasitica to the flasks, we could see mortality characterized by round filamentous growth around the eggs. Survival rate 5 days post-inoculation was 22.5% (Figure 5 and Figure 6D). In this treatment, all larvae died after 14 days. When 5 mg/L 8-nonenoic acid was added to the eggs challenged with S. parasitica, the survival rate increased to 77% (Figure 5). In this case, mortality was not characterized by round filamentous units, but rather by a non-vital egg/larva (Figure 6C). In this treatment, challenged larvae were reared for more than 2 weeks to follow their development, which was normal. Ninety-eight percent of the eggs in flasks that were supplemented with 5 mg/L 8-nonenoic acid only hatched and developed properly, suggesting that the compound could be used in future applications on the eggs at this concentration. No toxicity of 30 mg/L 8-nonenoic acid was observed, and hatching and development were normal. Interactions between treatments were found to be significant: control vs. S. parasitica (p < 0.001), 5 mg/L 8-nonenoic acid only vs. S. parasitica (p < 0.001) and 5 mg/L 8-nonenoic acid + S. parasitica vs. S. parasitica (p = 0.0015).

3. Discussion

ABp5 was previously isolated [18] as an endophyte from the seaweed B. plumosa. ABp5 demonstrated inhibitory activity against the fish pathogen S. parasitica in in vitro assays. We therefore decided to isolate and identify the secondary active molecules that it secretes. Because of the endophyte’s activity in antibiosis petri-plate assays, we initially assumed that the active compounds are secreted into the growth medium. However, our attempts to additionally extract active crude from liquid growth medium were unsuccessful. Yet, when we re-cultured ABp5 from this liquid growth medium on solid agar medium, it was once again found to be active against S. parasitica. Therefore, we assumed that the active metabolites are not secreted by the bacteria but are emitted as active volatile compounds. To test this assumption, we conducted an assay designed to evaluate the activity of volatile metabolites by using a two-compartment petri plate. Our results demonstrated inhibition of S. parasitica by the volatiles of ABp5 in this assay.
To identify the VOCs emitted by ABp5, we used SPME. The fiber was incubated with the growing endophyte prior to GC–MS analysis. The GC–MS analysis suggested 10 low-molecular-weight (151–256) molecules from different families of secondary metabolites (Table 1). We purchased nine of them; the volatile compound oxime-, methoxy-phenyl-_ was not available for purchase, but a review of the literature showed that this volatile is known for its anti-viral, anti-bacterial and anti-fungal bioactivity [27,28]. The other nine metabolites were tested in in vitro assays for their inhibitory activity against the aquaculture pathogen S. parasitica. Of these, only 8-nonenoic acid exhibited meaningful biological activity against S. parasitica. 8-Nonenoic acid is a medium-chain fatty acid with the molecular formula C9H16O2. It is mainly a starting or intermediate material for reactions found in nature [29,30] or in the industry [31,32]. However, it is found as an end product in substances secreted by different animals as a defense mechanism or for behavioral purposes [33,34]. It is also found in extracts of different plants and is considered to have antimicrobial properties [35,36].
Although identification of the active bacterial compound from the NIST library was 8-nonenoic acid, we confirmed its identity by two more methods: biological and chemical. The biological method consisted of an antibiosis activity test of the standard against S. parasitica (Figure 2). The chemical method consisted of exposing SPME fiber to the 8-nonenoic acid standard and the endophyte under the same conditions and analyzing it by GC–MS. Both methods gave the same result: the active compound in the VOCs and the 8-nonenoic acid standard acted the same (Figure 2 and Figure 3). This, to our understanding, proves that the identity of the emitted compound from ABp5 is 8-nonenoic acid.
A concentration assay in liquid and solid media was performed to determine the most effective concentration for full pathogen inhibition. We were also interested in determining whether the state of the medium (liquid/solid) influences the compound’s activity. Due to the fact that the growth radios of control treatment (S. parasitica plug with only water and PDB) in liquid was smaller than control treatment in solid media, we had to normalize the results of S. parasitica’s growth radius from all other treatments by presenting the percentage of growth compered to control. This allowed us to compare the efficiency of 8-nonenoic acid’s inhibition between solid and liquid. Since 8-nonenoic acid was discovered as a volatile, we initially tested its ability to inhibit S. parasitica as a volatile and not by direct contact (as described in Liarzi et al., 2020). Unexpectedly, 8-nonenoic acid did not inhibit S. parasitica in the whole petri-plate area. Therefore, we tested its activity by adding the standard directly into the medium (Figure 4). We think that when this metabolite is added to a solid culture it evaporates to the upper air volume of the compartment. As a volatile, this molecule is active, but the concentration needs to be higher than that in direct contact in order to affect the pathogen. Although the compound’s solubility in water is very limited (284 mg/L at 30 °C) it demonstrates activity at a much lower concentration in water than as a volatile or in solid culture. We do not know why this is the case, but it is not the first time that we have encountered this behavior of volatile metabolites [37]. We speculate it has to do with the molecule ability to move and migrate easier in the liquid media than in the agar matrix but was not demonstrated in our study.
A simple in vivo bioassay was performed by exposing tilapia eggs to S. parasitica in the presence or absence of 8-nonenoic acid. We chose to use tilapia as a model for infected eggs as they are easy to treat, relatively easy to infect with the pathogen and available at the hatchery in the department of fisheries at the Volcani Institute (Rishon LeZion, Israel). We found that 8-nonenoic acid at very low concentrations can control the pathogen and prevent disease development on tilapia eggs, while exhibiting no toxicity to the eggs or larvae, which grew and developed normally. We found a significant effect of the S. parasitica-inoculation treatment on the eggs’ mortality compared to the non-inoculated eggs (control) or the eggs treated with 8-nonenoic acid only. This means that the inoculation of S. parasitica was successful and that at 5 mg/L, 8-nonenoic acid is not lethal to the eggs. Moreover, addition of 5 mg/L 8-nonenoic acid to eggs infected by S. parasitica significantly reduced egg mortality, meaning that it prevents infection of the eggs and enables them to develop normally (Figure 5). As a comparison Willoughby 1992 reported the efficiency of Malachite green oxalate against S. parasitica at the 0.25 mg/L in salmonid fish hatcheries [38]. Since 1983, Malachite green oxalate was banned for use in aquaculture and food related applications in many countries due to its classification as a Class II Health Hazard and evidence to its toxicity and carcinogenicity [39]. Other compounds were screened and tested in search after a safe competent control for Saprolegnia spp. and other fish pathogens, among those bronopol (2-bromo-2-nitropropane-1,3-diol) was found effective at the ranges of 50–100 mg/L against S. parasitica [40], Formalin at the range of 100–400 mg/L, it is needs to be pointed that as with Malachite green formalin is currently not approved as a veterinary medicine for the treatment of live fish in most of the EU countries [39]. Additional compounds known to inhibit Saprolegnia spp. are Copper sulphate (1 mg/L), iodophores (50 mg/L) [41], Sodium chloride and a mixture of sodium and calcium chloride (20–30 g/L), Hydrogen peroxide and boric acid (0.2–4 g/L) [39]. Tedesco et al. 2019 described the screening of a list of other relatively considered safe chemicals and found some to be effective at the range of 50–5000 mg/L [39]. our result suggests that 8-nonenoic acid may be used in aquaculture hatcheries to treat the eggs against pathogens, using a low effective concentration. Nevertheless, these results need to be repeated and tested not only under laboratory conditions, but also under hatchery-like conditions.
Another aspect of this isolate that interested us was its potential pathogenicity to humans. This is relevant to its use as a biocontrol agent in aquaculture facilities. We used the PathogenFinder tool (version 1.1, Elixir bio.tools, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, UK) [42] on a whole-genome sequence of ABp5, and the isolate was predicted to be non-pathogenic to humans (A1_ PathogenFinder).
To conclude, in this study we demonstrated the biological activity of an algal endophyte against a specific aquaculture pathogen, the oomycete S. parasitica. We isolated an active secondary metabolite, identified it in biological and chemical analyses as 8-nonenoic acid, and suggest its use in aquaculture based on the results of in vitro and in vivo bioassays. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time such a link, and its demonstration between the compound and the pathogen, have been published.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Endophyte Isolation and Maintenance

K. flava isolate ABp5 was obtained as an endophyte from the seaweed Bryopsis plumosa. The seaweed was sampled from the Mediterranean shoreline, Israel (31°49′03.8″ N 34°38′24.9″ E). The endophyte was isolated as described in Deutsch et al. (2021) [18]. Briefly, the seaweed was surface-sterilized by two washes in 70% ethanol and 5 mm2 pieces were placed on nutrient agar (NA) growth medium (Acumedia, Lansing, MI, USA) and incubated at 25 °C for 8 days. The endophytes growing from the seaweed thallus were re-cultivated to obtain a “single-colony” culture. Identity of the isolate was verified using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification and multisequencing analysis as described in Deutsch et al. (2021) [18]. The endophyte was stored in 30% glycerol at −80 °C.

4.2. Bioactivity Assays

Isolate strain ABp5 was grown on NPDA [1/2 NA + 1/2 potato dextrose agar (PDA)] (Acumedia) and incubated at 25 °C for 7 days. Then, the oomycete pathogen S. parasitica was introduced to the culture plate by adding a plug of PDA harboring S. parasitica mycelia (inoculum from culture of five days growth), on the opposite side of the plate. The culture plate was incubated at 25 °C. Activity was evaluated in a two-compartment petri dish [Figure 1A, for volatile organic compounds (VOCs)], or a one-compartment petri dish (Figure 1B). The effect of ABp5 on S. parasitica was examined after 3 days, by comparing S. parasitica growth in the presence and absence of the isolate. The pathogen’s viability was evaluated by transferring inoculum plugs from the exposed pathogen to a fresh NPDA plate and evaluating its growth for 7 days (Figure 1C). All assays were performed in triplicate.

4.3. VOC Identification

Isolate ABp5 was grown on NAPD agar slant in 20 mL headspace screw-top vials (Thermo Scientific, Langerwehe, Germany). The isolate was spread on the NAPD agar in each vial and incubated at 25 °C for 3 days. A vial with only NAPD agar was incubated as a control, to subtract the media’s volatiles from the sample. A solid-phase microextraction (SPME) fiber assembly with a 50/30 μm polydimethylsiloxane/divinylbenzene/carboxen (PDMS/DVB/CAR) fiber, StableFlex (2 cm) 24 Ga needle, and manual holder (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA) was introduced into the vial headspace for 24 h. The exposed SPME fiber was then inserted into the injector port of a gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) apparatus for 10 min. VOCs were analyzed in a 7890B GC, 5977A GC/MSD system equipped with an HP-5ms (5%-phenyl)-methylpolysiloxane phase capillary column, 1.33 m × 150 μm × 0.25 μm length × diameter × bore (Agilent Technologies, San Diego, CA, USA). The injector temperature was 160 °C, and pulsed splitless injection was used. The detector temperature was 280 °C. The oven temperature was held at 50 °C for 2 min, then increased to 180 °C at a rate of 8 °C/min, and then to 280 °C at 50 °C/min. The recorded mass range was 40 to 800 m/z, with electron energy of 70 eV. The GC-MS spectrum profiles were analyzed with Mass Hunter software combined with NIST 14 library. The volatiles were identified by comparison of their retention indices with published values (Table 1).

4.3.1. Testing Standards for Bioactivity against S. parasitica

Standards of the compounds identified by GC-MS (Table 1 and Table S1) were purchased and tested for bioactivity against S. parasitica by adding 100 μg of each standard dissolved in 100% Ethanol to a sterile 6 mm Whatman filter disk together with plugs of S. parasitica mycelia (inoculum from culture of five days growth) on PDA plates at 19 °C (Figure 2). The standard found bioactive against S. parasitica (8-nonenoic acid) was subjected to identification by GC comparison.

4.3.2. 8-Nonenoic Acid Identification by GC Comparison

Identification of the bioactive compound 8-nonenoic acid was validated by comparing the GC-MS retention time output and molecular fragmentation of the endophytic product with an available authentic standard obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). ABp5 on NPDA agar slant grown for three days and 100 μg/mL of the standard dissolved in double-distilled water (DDW) were exposed to SPME fiber for 24 h. Then, fibers were inserted into GC–MS apparatus and VOCs were compared.

4.4. In Vitro 8-Nonenoic Acid Concentration Bioassay

The inhibitory activity of the compound 8-nonenoic acid was examined in both liquid and solid media. For the liquid assay, a 48 well plate was used. A 5 mm plug of PDA harboring S. parasitica mycelia (inoculum from culture of five days growth) was introduced into wells containing 1 mL of sterile DDW with 10 μL of potato dextrose broth (PDB) and varying concentrations of 8-nonenoic acid dissolved in ethanol (0, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, 20 μg/mL). The plate was incubated at 19 °C for 3 days. For the solid assay, a 5 mm plug of PDA harboring S. parasitica mycelia (inoculum from culture of five days growth) was introduced into 50 mm petri plates with PDA containing varying concentrations of 8-nonenoic acid dissolved in ethanol (as for the liquid assay) and incubated at 19 °C for 3 days. For both liquid and solid assays, mycelium growth radius was measured and percent growth compared to the control (taken as 100%) was calculated. S. parasitica plug viability was evaluated by transferring them to fresh PDB/PDA and observing growth for 7 days. All experiments were performed in triplicate.

4.5. In Vivo Influence of 8-Nonenoic Acid on Tilapia Eggs Challenged with S. parasitica

An in vivo bioassay was performed using Mozambique tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus) eggs obtained from the hatchery at the department of fisheries of the Agricultural Research Organization, Volcani Institute. Tilapia eggs, 3 days postfertilization, were collected from the mouth of an adult female and brought to the laboratory. Eggs were rinsed with filtered tap water. Dead, undeveloped and disrupted eggs were removed from the batch. Eggs were counted and then divided into thirty 100 mL Erlenmeyer flasks (10 eggs per flask). The flasks, containing 25 mL filtered tap water, were subjected to five different treatments (two different experiments with three flasks per treatment in each experiment): (1) control treatment—eggs with 12.5 μL ethanol; (2) eggs with 5 mg/L 8-nonenoic acid dissolved in ethanol (12.5 μL ethanol); (3) eggs with 5 mg/L 8-nonenoic acid and two clover seeds inoculated with S. parasitica; (4) eggs with 12.5 μL ethanol and two clover seeds inoculated with S. parasitica; (5) toxicity treatment—eggs with 30 mg/L of 8-nonenoic acid dissolved in ethanol (12.5 μL ethanol). Flasks were incubated on a shaker incubator at 25 °C, 115 rpm and natural daylight for 5 days. Then the number of viable hatched larvae was recorded.

4.6. Statistical Analysis

S. parasitica growth (in vitro assay) and larval survival (in vivo assay) values were analyzed with the JMP 10 software package (SAS Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Mean values of % maximal S. parasitica growth and % viable larvae were subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey–Kramer multiple comparison test, with significance set to p < 0.05.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/md21090476/s1, Table S1: Volatiles secreted by isolate ABp5–additional information.

Author Contributions

Y.D.: Writing—Original draft preparation, Methodology, Investigation, Conceptualization, Visualization, Formal analysis. M.S.: Methodology, Software, Resources. A.N.: Resources, Validation. I.B.-F.: Conceptualization, Writing—review & editing, Supervision. D.E.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Writing—review & editing, Supervision, Project administration. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is part of COST Action CA18238 (Ocean4Biotech), supported by the COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) program. This work was supported by a grant from the Chief Scientist of the Israeli Ministry of Agriculture (grant # 20-02-0122) and Copia Agro Israel.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the Agricultural Research Organization committee for ethics as no animal use in the experiments and was carried out in compliance with the current laws governing biological research in Israel (Approval number: 954/22 IL).

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article or Supplementary Materials. The data presented in this study are available in this article or Supplementary Materials Table S1.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Rita Smirnov and Tamir Ofek from The Central Laboratory for Fish Health, Nir David, Israel for providing the fish pathogen S. parasitica; and Avner Cnaani and Tali Nitzan from the department of fisheries at the Agricultural Research Organization’s Volcani Institute for providing tilapia eggs for the in vivo assays.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results. The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Rodriguez, R.; Redman, R. More than 400 million years of evolution and some plants still can’t make it on their own: Plant stress tolerance via fungal symbiosis. J. Exp. Bot. 2008, 59, 1109–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Liarzi, O.; Bar, E.; Lewinsohn, E.; Ezra, D. Use of the endophytic fungus Daldinia cf. concentrica and Its volatiles as bio-control agents. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0168242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bacon, C.W.; White, J.F. Functions, mechanisms and regulation of endophytic and epiphytic microbial communities of plants. Symbiosis 2016, 68, 87–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gouda, S.; Das, G.; Sen, S.K.; Shin, H.S.; Patra, J.K. Endophytes: A treasure house of bioactive compounds of medicinal importance. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Masand, M.; Jose, P.A.; Menghani, E.; Jebakumar, S.R.D. Continuing hunt for endophytic actinomycetes as a source of novel biologically active metabolites. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 31, 1863–1875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Newman, D.J.; Cragg, G.M. Plant endophytes and epiphytes: Burgeoning sources of known and “unknown” cytotoxic and antibiotic agents? Planta Med. 2020, 86, 891–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Flewelling, A.J.; Ellsworth, K.T.; Sanford, J.; Forward, E.; Johnson, J.A.; Gray, C.A. Macroalgal endophytes from the Atlantic coast of Canada: A potential source of antibiotic natural products? Microorganisms 2013, 1, 175–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Girão, M.; Ribeiro, I.; Ribeiro, T.; Azevedo, I.C.; Pereira, F.; Urbatzka, R.; Leão, P.N.; Carvalho, M.F. Actinobacteria isolated fromI laminaria ochroleuca: A source of new bioactive compounds. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Barka, E.A.; Vatsa, P.; Sanchez, L.; Gaveau-Vaillant, N.; Jacquard, C.; Klenk, H.-P.; Clément, C.; Ouhdouch, Y.; van Wezel, G.P. Taxonomy, physiology, and natural products of Actinobacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2016, 80, 1–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Anandan, R.; Dharumadurai, D.; Manogaran, G.P. An Introduction to Actinobacteria; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2016; ISBN 978-953-51-2248-7. [Google Scholar]
  11. Manivasagan, P.; Venkatesan, J.; Sivakumar, K.; Kim, S.K. Pharmaceutically active secondary metabolites of marine Actinobacteria. Microbiol. Res. 2014, 169, 262–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhou, G.; Luo, X.; Tang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Yang, Q.; Qiu, Y.; Fang, C.X. Kocuria flava sp. nov. and Kocuria turfanensis sp. nov., airborne Actinobacteria isolated from Xinjiang, China. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2008, 58, 1304–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Rakshit, A.; Sukul, S. Studies on two indole acetic acid (IAA) producing endophytic bacteria from Thelypteris interrupta (Wild.) K. Iwats and their effect on seed germination. Res. J. Agric. Sci. 2021, 12, 2037–2043. [Google Scholar]
  14. Pachaiyappan, A.; Sadhasivam, G.; Kumar, M.; Muthuvel, A. Biomedical potential of astaxanthin from novel endophytic pigment producing bacteria Pontibacter korlensis AG6. Waste Biomass Valori. 2021, 12, 2119–2129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Singh, N.K.; Rai, U.N.; Verma, D.K.; Rathore, G. Kocuria flava induced growth and chromium accumulation in Cicer arietinum L. Int. J. Phytoremediation 2013, 16, 14–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kaur, H.; Dolma, K.; Kaur, N.; Malhotra, A.; Kumar, N.; Dixit, P.; Sharma, D.; Mayilraj, S.; Choudhury, A.R. Marine microbe as nano-factories for copper biomineralization. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 2015, 20, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sun, W.; Liu, C.; Zhang, F.; Zhao, M.; Li, Z. Comparative genomics provides insights into the marine adaptation in sponge-derived Kocuria flava S43. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Deutsch, Y.; Gur, L.; Berman Frank, I.; Ezra, D. Endophytes from algae, a potential source for new biologically active metabolites for disease management in aquaculture. Front. Mar. Sci. 2021, 8, 636636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ba-akdah, M.A.; Satheesh, S. Characterization and antifouling activity analysis of extracellular polymeric substances produced by an epibiotic bacterial strain Kocuria flava associated with the green macroalga Ulva lactuca. Acta Oceanol. Sin. 2021, 40, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Najjar, A.; Hassan, E.A.; Zabermawi, N.; Saber, S.H.; Bajrai, L.H.; Almuhayawi, M.S.; Abujamel, T.S.; Almasaudi, S.B.; Azhar, L.E.; Moulay, M.; et al. Optimizing the catalytic activities of methanol and thermo tolerant Kocuria flava lipases for biodiesel production from cooking oil wastes. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 13659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hollants, J.; Decleyre, H.; Leliaert, F.; De Clerck, O.; Willems, A. Life without a cell membrane: Challenging the specificity of bacterial endophytes within Bryopsis (Bryopsidales, chlorophyta). BMC Microbiol. 2011, 11, 255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Van West, P. Saprolegnia parasitica, an oomycete pathogen with a fishy appetite: New challenges for an old problem. Mycologist 2006, 20, 99–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Earle, G.; Hintz, W. New approaches for controlling Saprolegnia parasitica, the causal agent of a devastating fish disease. Trop. Life Sci. Res. 2014, 25, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Schar, D.; Klein, E.Y.; Laxminarayan, R.; Gilbert, M.; Boeckel, T.P. Van Global trends in antimicrobial use in aquaculture. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 21878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Luthman, O.; Jonell, M.; Troell, M. Governing the salmon farming industry: Comparison between national regulations and the ASC salmon standard. Mar. Policy 2019, 106, 103534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nation. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2020; Sustainability in Action; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2020; pp. 1–244. [Google Scholar]
  27. Siri-udom, S.; Suwannarach, N.; Lumyong, S. Existence of Muscodor vitigenus, M. equiseti and M. heveae Sp. Nov. in leaves of the rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis Müll. Arg.), and their biocontrol potential. Ann. Microbiol. 2016, 66, 437–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Burranboina, K.K.; Kumar, K.M.; Manjunatha Reddy, G.B.; Yogisharadhya, R.; Prashantha, C.N.; Dhulappa, A. GC-MS analysis, molecular docking and pharmacokinetic studies of various bioactive compounds from methanolic leaf extracts of Leucas aspera (L) against anti-capripox viral activity. Chem. Data Collect. 2022, 39, 100873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sisido, K.; Kawanisi, M.; Kondö, K.; Morimoto, T.; Saitö, A.; Hukue, N. Syntheses of 9-keto- and 10-hydroxy-trans-2-decenoic acids and related compounds. J. Org. Chem. 1962, 27, 4073–4076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chan, T.H.; Stossel, D. Chemistry of l,3,5-tris(trimethylsiloxy)-l-methoxyhexa-l,3,5-triene, a β-tricarbonyl trianion equivalent. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 2423–2428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kula, J.; Smigielski, K.; Quang, T.B.; Grzelak, I.; Sikora, M. Preparation of ω-hydroxynonanoic acid and its ester derivatives. JAOCS J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 1999, 76, 811–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Unanyan, M.P.; Vinogradova, L.P.; Filippov, V.V.; Zav’yalov, S.I. New method of synthesis of biologically important derivatives of pelargonic acid. Bull. Acad. Sci. USSR Div. Chem. Sci. 1967, 16, 1722–1724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. De Facci, M.; Wang, H.L.; Yuvaraj, J.K.; Dublon, I.A.N.; Svensson, G.P.; Chapman, T.W.; Anderbrant, O. Chemical composition of anal droplets of the eusocial gall-inducing thrips Kladothrips intermedius. Chemoecology 2014, 24, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Khazanehdari, C.; Buglass, A.J.; Waterhouse, J.S. Anal Gland secretion of european mole: Volatile constituents and significance in territorial maintenance. J. Chem. Ecol. 1996, 22, 383–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yakubu, O.E.; Abah, M. Comparative determination of antioxidant activities and phytochemicals from fractions of ethanol extract of Senna occidentalis using GC-MS. J. Emerg. Technol. Innov. Res. 2021, 8, 195–211. [Google Scholar]
  36. Ravichandran, Y.D.; Yetayih, M.M. The GC–MS analysis of the diethylether and ethylacetate fraction of the peel of Solanum incanum and the study of their antibacterial activity. Adv. Tradit. Med. 2022, 22, 809–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Liarzi, O.; Benichis, M.; Gamliel, A.; Ezra, D. trans-2-octenal, a single compound of a fungal origin, controls Sclerotium rolfsii, both in vitro and in soil. Pest Manag. Sci. 2020, 76, 2068–2071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Willoughby, L.G.; Roberts, R.J. Towards strategic use of fungicides against Saprolegnia parasitica in salmonid fish hatcheries. J. Fish Dis. 1992, 15, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tedesco, P.; Fioravanti, M.L.; Galuppi, R. In vitro activity of chemicals and commercial products against Saprolegnia parasitica and Saprolegnia delica strains. J. Fish Dis. 2019, 42, 237–248. [Google Scholar]
  40. Oono, H.; Hatai, K.; Miura, M.; Tuchida, N.; Kiryu, T. The use of bronopol to control fungal infection in rainbow trout eggs. Biocontrol Sci. 2007, 12, 55–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Eissa, A.E.; Abdelsalam, M.; Tharwat, N.; Zaki, M. Detection of Saprolegnia parasitica in eggs of angelfish Pterophyllum scalare (cuvier–valenciennes) with a history of decreased hatchability. Int. J. Vet. Sci. 2013, 1, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Cosentino, S.; Voldby Larsen, M.; Møller Aarestrup, F.; Lund, O. Pathogenfinder–distinguishing friend from foe using bacterial whole genome sequence data. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e77302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Marinedrugs 21 00476 g001
Figure 1. In vitro bioactivity assays of K. flava isolate ABp5 against the aquaculture pathogen Saprolegnia parasitica. ABp5 was grown in the middle of an NPDA plate for a week (A + B, right plates) before a plug of solid medium harboring live S. parasitica mycelia was added to the plates. Control plates were inoculated with S. parasitica in the absence of ABp5 (A + B, left plates). (A) A two-compartment petri plate used for the bioactive volatile emission assay. The divider prevents any direct contact of ABp5 and its secreted secondary metabolites with the pathogen, allowing only volatile movement in the headspace between the compartments. (B) One-compartment petri plate. In this assay, ABp5 can inhibit the pathogen through both direct and indirect contact with secondary metabolites (secreted or emitted through the agar or the headspace, respectively). In both panels A and B, S. parasitica was fully inhibited by ABp5. (C) Pathogen viability assay. S. parasitica from both assays (direct and headspace exposure) were transferred to a plate with new medium plate in the absence of ABp5. There was no growth of pathogens from either assay (shown for the headspace experiment only); a plug from the control plate was viable and grew as expected (right side of the plate).
Figure 1. In vitro bioactivity assays of K. flava isolate ABp5 against the aquaculture pathogen Saprolegnia parasitica. ABp5 was grown in the middle of an NPDA plate for a week (A + B, right plates) before a plug of solid medium harboring live S. parasitica mycelia was added to the plates. Control plates were inoculated with S. parasitica in the absence of ABp5 (A + B, left plates). (A) A two-compartment petri plate used for the bioactive volatile emission assay. The divider prevents any direct contact of ABp5 and its secreted secondary metabolites with the pathogen, allowing only volatile movement in the headspace between the compartments. (B) One-compartment petri plate. In this assay, ABp5 can inhibit the pathogen through both direct and indirect contact with secondary metabolites (secreted or emitted through the agar or the headspace, respectively). In both panels A and B, S. parasitica was fully inhibited by ABp5. (C) Pathogen viability assay. S. parasitica from both assays (direct and headspace exposure) were transferred to a plate with new medium plate in the absence of ABp5. There was no growth of pathogens from either assay (shown for the headspace experiment only); a plug from the control plate was viable and grew as expected (right side of the plate).
Marinedrugs 21 00476 g001
Marinedrugs 21 00476 g002
Figure 2. 8-nonenoic acid inhibitory activity against Saprolegnia parasitica in agar plates exam. Inhibition was recorded after seven days. S. parasitica plugs, 100 μg of 8-nonenoic acid (left disk) and ethanol (right disk) as a control. Inhibition is expressed as avoidance of growth towards the paper disk loaded with 8-nonenoic acid while the Saprolegnia mycelium grows with no disturbance towards the ethanol loaded discs.
Figure 2. 8-nonenoic acid inhibitory activity against Saprolegnia parasitica in agar plates exam. Inhibition was recorded after seven days. S. parasitica plugs, 100 μg of 8-nonenoic acid (left disk) and ethanol (right disk) as a control. Inhibition is expressed as avoidance of growth towards the paper disk loaded with 8-nonenoic acid while the Saprolegnia mycelium grows with no disturbance towards the ethanol loaded discs.
Marinedrugs 21 00476 g002
Marinedrugs 21 00476 g003
Figure 3. Identification of 8-nonenoic acid. (A) Comparative analysis of GC–MS retention times (RT) of ABp5 and authentic standard. 8-Nonenoic acid standard peak (light orange) with RT of ~14 min post-injection and the ABp5 peaks (red), released from the SPME, showing one peak at ~14 min post-injection with similar features (shape and slope) as the authentic standard. (B) Fractionation comparing the peak identified as 8-nonenoic acid secreted by ABp5 (red-line columns above axis) and the peak produced by the purchased authentic standard (blue-line columns below axis). The fractionations given by the GC–MS are identical for both.
Figure 3. Identification of 8-nonenoic acid. (A) Comparative analysis of GC–MS retention times (RT) of ABp5 and authentic standard. 8-Nonenoic acid standard peak (light orange) with RT of ~14 min post-injection and the ABp5 peaks (red), released from the SPME, showing one peak at ~14 min post-injection with similar features (shape and slope) as the authentic standard. (B) Fractionation comparing the peak identified as 8-nonenoic acid secreted by ABp5 (red-line columns above axis) and the peak produced by the purchased authentic standard (blue-line columns below axis). The fractionations given by the GC–MS are identical for both.
Marinedrugs 21 00476 g003
Marinedrugs 21 00476 g004
Figure 4. Bioactivity of 8-nonenoic acid against Saprolegnia parasitica. Different concentrations of 8-nonenoic acid were added to solid (PDA) and liquid (DDW and PDB) media. Results present the percentage of maximal (control) growth of S. parasitica at the different concentrations. The results were subjected to ANOVA followed by Tukey–Kramer multiple comparison test; different letters above points on curve indicate a significant difference between solid and liquid media at p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 4. Bioactivity of 8-nonenoic acid against Saprolegnia parasitica. Different concentrations of 8-nonenoic acid were added to solid (PDA) and liquid (DDW and PDB) media. Results present the percentage of maximal (control) growth of S. parasitica at the different concentrations. The results were subjected to ANOVA followed by Tukey–Kramer multiple comparison test; different letters above points on curve indicate a significant difference between solid and liquid media at p ≤ 0.05.
Marinedrugs 21 00476 g004
Marinedrugs 21 00476 g005
Figure 5. Effect of 8-nonenoic acid on Saprolegnia parasitica pathogenicity on tilapia eggs. Percent survival of tilapia eggs 5 days post-inoculation with S. parasitica in the presence or absence of 8-nonenoic acid is presented as a column graph. Control: eggs with ethanol only; 8-nonenoic acid 5 mg/L: eggs with 8-nonenoic acid only at a concentration of 5 mg/L; S. parasitica + 8-None 5 mg/L: eggs inoculated with S. parasitica and 5 mg/L 8-nonenoic acid; S. parasitica: eggs with S. parasitica only. Results were subjected to ANOVA followed by Tukey–Kramer multiple comparison test; different letters above the bars indicate a significant difference between treatments at p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 5. Effect of 8-nonenoic acid on Saprolegnia parasitica pathogenicity on tilapia eggs. Percent survival of tilapia eggs 5 days post-inoculation with S. parasitica in the presence or absence of 8-nonenoic acid is presented as a column graph. Control: eggs with ethanol only; 8-nonenoic acid 5 mg/L: eggs with 8-nonenoic acid only at a concentration of 5 mg/L; S. parasitica + 8-None 5 mg/L: eggs inoculated with S. parasitica and 5 mg/L 8-nonenoic acid; S. parasitica: eggs with S. parasitica only. Results were subjected to ANOVA followed by Tukey–Kramer multiple comparison test; different letters above the bars indicate a significant difference between treatments at p ≤ 0.05.
Marinedrugs 21 00476 g005
Marinedrugs 21 00476 g006
Figure 6. Effect of 8-nonenoic acid on tilapia eggs/larvae inoculated with Saprolegnia parasitica, evaluated 5 days post-inoculation. (A) Eggs with ethanol only: all of the larvae developed and hatched normally. (B) Eggs with 5 mg/L 8-nonenoic acid: 98% of the larvae developed and hatched normally. (C) Eggs with 5 mg/L 8-nonenoic acid inoculated with S. parasitica: 77% developed and hatched normally, dead eggs did not develop fungal-like growth. (D) Eggs inoculated with S. parasitica: 22.5% survived, infected eggs developed fungal-like growth.
Figure 6. Effect of 8-nonenoic acid on tilapia eggs/larvae inoculated with Saprolegnia parasitica, evaluated 5 days post-inoculation. (A) Eggs with ethanol only: all of the larvae developed and hatched normally. (B) Eggs with 5 mg/L 8-nonenoic acid: 98% of the larvae developed and hatched normally. (C) Eggs with 5 mg/L 8-nonenoic acid inoculated with S. parasitica: 77% developed and hatched normally, dead eggs did not develop fungal-like growth. (D) Eggs inoculated with S. parasitica: 22.5% survived, infected eggs developed fungal-like growth.
Marinedrugs 21 00476 g006
Table 1. Volatiles secreted by isolate ABp5 and identified by GC–MS through a comparison of their retention indices with published values (NIST 14).
Table 1. Volatiles secreted by isolate ABp5 and identified by GC–MS through a comparison of their retention indices with published values (NIST 14).
Retention Time (Min)Compound *FamilyMolecular FormulaMassScoreHeightArea
6.882Oxime-, methoxy-phenyl-_PhenolC8H9NO2151.179.121,321,30753,113,398
9.4882-Propyl-1-pentanolAlcoholC8H18O130.185.711,055,72042,679,237
10.7732-NonanoneKetoneC9H18O142.182.442,906,36985,262,293
12.1372-DecanoneKetoneC10H20O156.275.061,167,69233,491,708
12.3838-Nonenoic acidFatty acidC9H16O2156.182.06755,02328,399,821
14.5132-UndecanoneKetoneC11H22O170.291.033,424,02579,041,922
14.6232-UndecanolAlcoholC11H24O172.283.821,391,47944,357,455
15.7162-DodecanoneKetoneC12H24O184.273.231,460,93639,991,523
17.232-TridecanoneKetoneC13H26O198.288.751,502,87436,978,277
19.3792,2,4-Trimethyl-1,3-pentanediol diisobutyrateEsterC16H30O4286.283.72,495,85173,829,637
* Identified according to NIST Mass Spectral Library.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Deutsch, Y.; Samara, M.; Nasser, A.; Berman-Frank, I.; Ezra, D. Kocuria flava, a Bacterial Endophyte of the Marine Macroalga Bryopsis plumosa, Emits 8-Nonenoic Acid Which Inhibits the Aquaculture Pathogen Saprolegnia parasitica. Mar. Drugs 2023, 21, 476. https://doi.org/10.3390/md21090476

AMA Style

Deutsch Y, Samara M, Nasser A, Berman-Frank I, Ezra D. Kocuria flava, a Bacterial Endophyte of the Marine Macroalga Bryopsis plumosa, Emits 8-Nonenoic Acid Which Inhibits the Aquaculture Pathogen Saprolegnia parasitica. Marine Drugs. 2023; 21(9):476. https://doi.org/10.3390/md21090476

Chicago/Turabian Style

Deutsch, Ynon, Mohamed Samara, Ahmed Nasser, Ilana Berman-Frank, and David Ezra. 2023. "Kocuria flava, a Bacterial Endophyte of the Marine Macroalga Bryopsis plumosa, Emits 8-Nonenoic Acid Which Inhibits the Aquaculture Pathogen Saprolegnia parasitica" Marine Drugs 21, no. 9: 476. https://doi.org/10.3390/md21090476

APA Style

Deutsch, Y., Samara, M., Nasser, A., Berman-Frank, I., & Ezra, D. (2023). Kocuria flava, a Bacterial Endophyte of the Marine Macroalga Bryopsis plumosa, Emits 8-Nonenoic Acid Which Inhibits the Aquaculture Pathogen Saprolegnia parasitica. Marine Drugs, 21(9), 476. https://doi.org/10.3390/md21090476

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop