The Significance of Serum CA-125 Level on the Live Birth Rates of In Vitro Fertilisation in Women with Endometriosis
Abstract
1. Introduction
Plain Language Summary
2. Materials and Methods
Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Demographic Characteristics
3.2. Serum CA-125 Levels During Stimulated IVF and Frozen Embryo Transfer Cycles
3.3. Association of Serum CA-125 Levels and Live Birth in Fresh and Frozen Embryo Transfer Cycles
3.4. Effect of Endometriosis Surgery on Serum CA-125 and Anti-Mullerian Hormone (AMH) Levels
4. Discussion
4.1. Key Findings
4.2. Change in Serum CA-125 Level During the Stimulated IVF Cycle
4.3. Effect of Serum CA-125 Level on the Ovarian Response and Pregnancy Rate
4.4. Effect of Endometriosis Surgery on Serum CA-125 Levels and Outcomes
4.5. Limitations
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| IVF | In vitro fertilization |
| GnRH | Gonadotrophin releasing hormone |
| LH | Luteinising hormone |
| PPOS | Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation |
| HCG | Human chorionic gonadotrophin |
| AMH | Anti-mullerian hormone |
References
- Morris, G.; Lilly, C.; Jefferys, A.; O’Donovan, O.; Akande, V. Endometriosis and subfertility. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2024, 26, 32–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Barnhart, K.; Dunsmoor-Su, R.; Coutifaris, C. Effect of endometriosis on in vitro fertilization. Fertil. Steril. 2002, 77, 1148–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Feichtinger, M.; Nordenhök, E.; Olofsson, J.I.; Hadziosmanovic, N.; Rodriguez-Wallberg, K.A. Endometriosis and cumulative live birth rate after fresh and frozen IVF cycles with single embryo transfer in young women: No impact beyond reduced ovarian sensitivity—A case control study. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2019, 36, 1649–1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Hamdan, M.; Dunselman, G.; Li, T.C.; Cheong, Y. The impact of endometrioma on IVF/ICSI outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum. Reprod. Update 2015, 21, 809–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hamdan, M.; Mukhri Omar, S.Z.; Dunselman, G.; Cheong, Y. Influence of endometriosis on assisted reproductive technology outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet. Gynecol. 2015, 125, 79–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Alson, S.; Henic, E.; Jokubkiene, L.; Sladkevicius, P. Endometriosis diagnosed by ultrasound is associated with lower live birth rates in women undergoing their first in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment. Fertil. Steril. 2024, 121, 832–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Harb, H.M.; Gallos, I.D.; Chu, J.; Harb, M.; Coomarasamy, A. The effect of endometriosis on in vitro fertilisation outcome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2013, 120, 1308–1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Morcel, K.; Merviel, P.; Bouée, S.; Le Guillou, M.; Carlier, M.; James, P.; Drapier, H.; Beauvillard, D. What is the impact of endometriosis and the AFS stage on cumulative pregnancy rates in IVF programs? Reprod. Health 2024, 21, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Burghaus, S.; Drazic, P.; Wölfler, M.; Mechsner, S.; Zeppernick, M.; Meinhold-Heerlein, I.; Mueller, M.D.; Rothmund, R.; Vigano, P.; Becker, C.M.; et al. Multicenter evaluation of blood-based biomarkers for the detection of endometriosis and adenomyosis: A prospective non-interventional study. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2024, 164, 305–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Cheng, Y.M.; Wang, S.T.; Chou, C.Y. Serum CA-125 in preoperative patients at high risk for endometriosis. Obstet. Gynecol. 2002, 99, 375–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lee, J.; Hong, D.G. Serum anti-Müllerian hormone recovery after ovarian cystectomy for endometriosis: A retrospective study among Korean women. Medicine 2022, 101, e30977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Mohamed, M.L.; El Behery, M.M.; Mansour, S.A.E.-A. Comparative study between VEGF-A and CA-125 in diagnosis and follow-up of advanced endometriosis after conservative laparoscopic surgery. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2013, 287, 77–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Önal, M.; Karli, P.; Özdemir, A.Z.; Kocaman, A.; Katirci, Y.; Çoban, G.; Nakişli, G.K.; Civil, Y.; Avci, B. Serum kisspeptin levels in deep-infiltrating, ovarian, and superficial endometriosis: A prospective observational study. Medicine 2022, 101, e31529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Ruan, Y.Q.; Liang, W.G.; Huang, S.H. Analysis of laparoscopy on endometriosis patients with high expression of CA125. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2015, 19, 1334–1337. [Google Scholar]
- Santulli, P.; Streuli, I.; Melonio, I.; Marcellin, L.; M’Baye, M.; Bititi, A.; Borghese, B.; Lafay Pillet, M.C.; Chapron, C. Increased serum cancer antigen-125 is a marker for severity of deep endometriosis. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2015, 22, 275–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sarbazi, F.; Akbari, E.; Karimi, A.; Nouri, B.; Noori Ardebili, S.H. The Clinical Outcome of Laparoscopic Surgery for Endometriosis on Pain, Ovarian Reserve, and Cancer Antigen 125 (CA-125): A Cohort Study. Int. J. Fertil. Steril. 2021, 15, 275–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Brandenberger, A.W.; Bersinger, N.A.; Huber, P.R.; Berger, E.; Glanzmann, P.; Birkhaeuser, M.H. CA-125 concentrations in the serum and pregnancy outcome in IVF cycles. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 1998, 15, 390–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Chryssikopoulos, A.; Mantzavinos, T.; Kanakas, N.; Karagouni, E.; Dotsika, E.; Zourlas, P.A. Correlation of serum and follicular fluid concentrations of placental protein 14 and CA-125 in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer patients. Fertil. Steril. 1996, 66, 599–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Miller, K.A.; Deaton, J.L.; Pittaway, D.E. Evaluation of serum CA 125 concentrations as predictors of pregnancy with human in vitro fertilization. Fertil. Steril. 1996, 65, 1184–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hauzman, E.E.; Lagarde, A.R.; Nagy, K.; Fancsovits, P.; Murber, A.; Jánoki, G.; Papp, Z.; Urbancsek, J. Prognostic value of serum CA-125 measurements on stimulation day 1 and on the day of oocyte pickup in the prediction of IVF treatment outcome. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2005, 22, 265–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Urbancsek, J.; Hauzman, E.E.; Murber, A.; Lagarde, A.R.; Rabe, T.; Papp, Z.; Strowitzki, T. Serum CA-125 and inhibin B levels in the prediction of ovarian response to gonadotropin stimulation in in vitro fertilization cycles. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 2005, 21, 38–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Vujisić, S.; Kupesić, S.; Mihaljević, D.; Aksamija, A.; Kurjak, A. Evaluation of serum CA 125 concentration before and during hormonal induced cycles as predictor of IVF/ET outcome. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2002, 48, 355–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Tavmergen, E.; Sendag, F.; Goker, E.N.; Levi, R. Value of serum CA-125 concentrations as predictors of pregnancy in assisted reproduction cycles. Hum. Reprod. 2001, 16, 1129–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Liu, C.; Tian, T.; Lou, Y.; Li, J.; Liu, P.; Li, R.; Qiao, J.; Wang, Y.; Yang, R. Live birth rate of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist versus luteal phase gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist protocol in IVF/ICSI: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Rev. Mol. Med. 2023, 26, e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Bon, G.G.; Kenemans, P.; Dekker, J.J.; Hompes, P.G.; Verstraeten, R.A.; van Kamp, G.J.; Schoemaker, J. Fluctuations in CA 125 and CA 15-3 serum concentrations during spontaneous ovulatory cycles. Hum. Reprod. 1999, 14, 566–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- McLemore, M.R.; Aouizerat, B.E.; Lee, K.A.; Chen, L.M.; Cooper, B.; Tozzi, M.; Miaskowski, C. A comparison of the cyclic variation in serum levels of CA125 across the menstrual cycle using two commercial assays. Biol. Res. Nurs. 2012, 14, 250–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Balachandran, A.; Nayak, S.R. An Observational Study of Factors affecting CA125 Levels in Premenopausal Women. Adv. Biomed. Res. 2023, 12, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lanzone, A.; Fulghesu, A.M.; Guida, C.; Muscatello, R.; Caruso, A.; Mancuso, S. Serum CA-125 levels do not depend on ovarian steroidogenesis. Fertil. Steril. 1990, 54, 415–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hallamaa, M.; Huhtinen, K.; Suvitie, P.; Perheentupa, A. Serum concentrations of HE4 change little during in vitro fertilization. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2014, 93, 640–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kafali, H.; Artuc, H.; Demir, N. Use of CA125 fluctuation during the menstrual cycle as a tool in the clinical diagnosis of endometriosis; a preliminary report. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2004, 116, 85–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Oliveira, M.A.P.; Raymundo, T.S.; Soares, L.C.; Pereira, T.R.D.; Demôro, A.V.E. How to Use CA-125 More Effectively in the Diagnosis of Deep Endometriosis. BioMed Res. Int. 2017, 2017, 9857196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wang, Y.; Yi, Y.C.; Guu, H.F.; Chen, Y.F.; Kung, H.F.; Chang, J.C.; Chen, L.Y.; Chuan, S.T.; Chen, M.J. Impact of adenomyosis and endometriosis on IVF/ICSI pregnancy outcome in patients undergoing gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist treatment and frozen embryo transfer. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 6741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Fish, K.E.; Phipps, M.; Trimarchi, J.; Weitzen, S.; Blazar, A.S. CA-125 serum levels and pregnancy outcome in in vitro fertilization. Fertil. Steril. 2004, 82, 1705–1707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Baalbergen, A.; Janssen, J.W.; van der Weiden, R.M. CA-125 levels are related to the likelihood of pregnancy after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2000, 43, 21–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Daniilidis, A.; Grigoriadis, G.; Kalaitzopoulos, D.R.; Angioni, S.; Kalkan, Ü.; Crestani, A.; Merlot, B.; Roman, H. Surgical Management of Ovarian Endometrioma: Impact on Ovarian Reserve Parameters and Reproductive Outcomes. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 5324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]

| Parameters | All (n = 234) | <35 IU/L (n = 90) | ≥35 IU/L (n = 144) | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age of women (years) | 36.0 (34.0–37.0) | 35.0 (33.5–37.0) | 36.0 (34.0–37.0) | 0.610 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 21.2 (19.6–23.0) | 20.7 (19.5–22.5) | 21.5 (19.7–23.3) | 0.136 |
| Duration of infertility (years) | 3.0 (2.0–5.0) | 3.0 (2.0–5.0) | 3.0 (2.0–5.0) | 0.818 |
| Antral follicle count | 7.0 (5.0–11.0) | 8.0 (5.0–12.0) | 7.0 (4.0–11.0) | 0.797 |
| Anti-Mullerian hormone (ng/mL) | 1.5 (0.8–2.7) | 1.5 (0.8–2.7) | 1.6 (0.8–2.8) | 0.812 |
| Diagnosis of endometriosis | ||||
| By operation | 163/234 (69.7%) | 60/90 (66.7) | 103/144 (71.5) | 0.555 |
| By sonography | 71/234 (30.3%) | 30/90 (33.3) | 41/144 (28.5 | |
| Previous endometriosis surgery | 152/234 (65.0) | 52/90 (57.8) | 100/144 (69.4) | 0.155 |
| Presence of endometrioma during ovarian stimulation | 129/216 (59.1%) | 36/77 (46.8%) | 93/139 (66.9%) | 0.009 * |
| Size of endometrioma if any (mm) | 16.0 (0–26.0) | 0 (0–22.5) | 18.5 (0–27.0) | 0.005 * |
| Ovarian stimulation protocol | 0.315 | |||
| GnRH antagonist | 157 (68.0%) | 57 (64.0%) | 100 (70.4%) | |
| PPOS | 74 (32.0%) | 32 (36.0%) | 42 (29.6%) | |
| Total dose of gonadotropins (IU) | 3000 (2400–3600) | 2925 (2250–3525) | 2963 (2456–3600) | 0.682 |
| Peak serum estradiol level (pmol/L) | 12,334 (7007–17,763) | 12,852 (7270–17,737) | 17,793 (6833–17,836) | 0.532 |
| Number of oocytes retrieved | 6.0 (4.0–11.0) | 7.0 (4.0–12.5) | 6.0 (3.0–10.0) | 0.081 |
| Pregnancy rate in the fresh IVF cycle | 20/70 (28.6%) | 6/26 (23.1%) | 14/44 (31.8%) | 0.585 |
| Live birth rate in the fresh IVF cycle | 9/67 (13.4%) | 3/25 (12.0%) | 6/42 (14.3%) | 0.762 |
| Parameters | Attainment of Live Birth | p-Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes (n = 9) | No (n = 58) | ||
| Age of women (year) | 37.0 (33.0–38.0) | 36.0 (34.0–38.0) | 0.492 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 22.7 (20.3–23.6) | 21.5 (20.0–24.5) | 0.455 |
| Duration of infertility (years) | 4.0 (2.5–5.0) | 4.0 (2.0–5.0) | 0.800 |
| Antral follicle count | 7.0 (4.5–8.0) | 6.0 (4.0–8.0) | 0.625 |
| Anti-Mullerian hormone (ng/mL) | 1.7 # | 1.2 (0.7–2.3) | 0.667 |
| Presence of endometrioma during ovarian stimulation | 5/9 (55.6%) | 35/54 (64.8%) | 0.593 |
| Size of endometrioma if any (mm) | 18.0 (0–22.0) | 19.5 (0–30.0) | 0.290 |
| Baseline serum CA-125 level (IU/L) | 55.4 (23.0–81.1) | 45.8 (28.7–104.5) | 0.971 |
| Baseline serum CA-125 level ≥ 35 IU/L | 6 (66.7%) | 35 (60.3%) | 1.000 |
| Serum CA-125 level on the trigger day (IU/L) | 43.5 (18.5–75.5) | 32.0 (21.6–70.4) | 0.815 |
| Serum CA-125 level on the trigger day ≥ 35 IU/L | 6 (66.7%) | 25 (43.1%) | 0.287 |
| Total dose of gonadotropins (IU) | 3300 (2138–3450) | 3038 (2644–3600) | 0.530 |
| Peak serum estradiol level (pmol/L) | 9596 (6444–14,547) | 8682 (4883–13,903) | 0.429 |
| Number of oocytes retrieved | 8.0 (6.0–11.5) | 8.0 (5.0–12.0) | 0.993 |
| Parameters | Attainment of Live Birth | p-Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes (n = 31) | No (n = 94) | ||
| Age of women at the time of transfer (year) | 36.0 (33.0–37.0) | 36.0 (34.0–37.0) | 0.605 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 20.9 (19.6–23.4) | 21.1 (19.5–22.7) | 0.878 |
| Duration of infertility (years) | 4.0 (2.0–5.0) | 3.0 (2.0–5.0) | 0.830 |
| Antral follicle count | 10.0 (6.5–13.0) | 9.0 (6.0–13.0) | 0.376 |
| Anti-Mullerian hormone (ng/mL) | 1.9 (0.9–2.5) | 1.9 (1.0–2.9) | 0.789 |
| Endometrial thickness | 9.9 (8.6–12.4) | 10.7 (9.5–12.5) | 0.230 |
| Type of cycles | 0.833 | ||
| Natural cycle | 19/31 (61.3) | 55/94 (58.5) | |
| Hormone replacement | 10/31 (32.3) | 35/94 (37.2) | |
| Letrozole-induced | 2/31 (6.5) | 4/94 (4.3) | |
| Baseline serum CA-125 level (IU/L) | 31.4 (23.3–84.3) | 42.6 (23.2–105.1) | 0.515 |
| Baseline serum CA-125 level ≥ 35 IU/L (%) | 15 (48.4%) | 53 (56.4%) | 0.534 |
| Serum CA-125 level on day of LH surge or starting progestogen (IU/L) | 23.9 (20.3–46.9) | 32.2 (17.3–70.7) | 0.498 |
| Serum CA-125 level on day of LH surge or starting progestogen ≥ 35 IU/L (%) | 10 (32.3%) | 42 (45.7%) | 0.293 |
| Parameters | All (n = 234) | <35 IU/L (n = 117) | ≥35 IU/L (n = 117) | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age of women (years) | 36.0 (34.0–37.0) | 36.0 (33.0–37.0) | 36.0 (34.0–37.0) | 0.453 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 21.2 (19.6–23.0) | 20.7 (19.5–22.6) | 21.7 (19.9–23.2) | 0.083 |
| Duration of infertility (years) | 3.0 (2.0–5.0) | 3.0 (2.0–5.0) | 3.0 (2.0–5.0) | 0.818 |
| Antral follicle count | 7.0 (5.0–11.0) | 7.5 (5.0–11.0) | 7.0 (4.0–11.25) | 0.880 |
| Anti-Mullerian hormone (ng/mL) | 1.5 (0.8–2.7) | 1.3 (0.8–2.6) | 1.7 (0.8–2.9) | 0.372 |
| Presence of endometrioma during ovarian stimulation | 129/216 (59.7%) | 49/102 (48.0%) | 80/114 70.2%) | 0.001 * |
| Size of endometrioma if any (mm) | 16.0 (0–26.0) | 0 (0–22.3) | 19.0 (0–27.0) | 0.001 * |
| Ovarian stimulation protocol | 0.003 * | |||
| GnRH antagonist | 160 (68.4%) | 69 (59.0%) | 91 (77.8%) | |
| PPOS | 74 (31.6%) | 48 (41.0%) | 26 (22.2%) | |
| Total dose of gonadotropins (IU) | 3000 (2400–3600) | 3000 (2325–3600) | 2963 (2475–3356) | 0.998 |
| Peak serum estradiol level (pmol/L) | 12,334 (7007–17,763) | 12,370 (6871–17,024) | 12,220 (7070–20,183) | 0.550 |
| Number of oocytes retrieved | 6.0 (4.0–11.0) | 7.0 (4.0–12.0) | 6.0 (3.0–10.0) | 0.173 |
| Pregnancy rate in the fresh IVF cycle | 20/70 (28.6%) | 6/35 (17.1%) | 14/35 (40.0%) | 0.036 * |
| Live birth rate in the fresh IVF cycle | 9/67 (13.4%) | 3/35 (8.6%) | 6/32 (18.8%) | 0.287 |
| Parameters | Serum Level in the Mid-Cycle <35 IU/L (n = 84) | Serum Level in the Mid-Cycle ≥35 IU/L (n = 57) | Odds Ratio (95% Confidence Interval) | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age of women at the time of transfer (years) | 36.0 (34.0–37.0) | 35.5 (33.0–37.0) | --- | 0.576 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 20.5 (19.5–22.4) | 21.2 (19.8–23.3) | --- | 0.274 |
| Endometrial thickness (mm) | 10.6 (9.2–12.3) | 10.4 (9.0–12.3) | --- | 0.476 |
| Type of cycles | --- | 0.413 | ||
| Natural cycle | 51 (60.1%) | 33 (57.9%) | ||
| Hormone replacement | 26 (31.0%) | 22 (38.6%) | ||
| Letrozole-induced | 4 (4.8%) | 2 (3.5%) | ||
| Pregnancy rate in frozen embryo transfer cycle | 34/81 (42.0%) | 20/56 (35.7%) | 0.750 (0.295–1.907) | 0.479 |
| Live birth rate in frozen embryo transfer cycles | 21/73 (28.8%) | 10/52 (19.2%) | 0.934 (0.429–2.036) | 0.293 |
| Endometriosis Surgery (n = 152) | No Endometriosis Surgery (n = 82) | p-Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Antral follicle count | 7.0 (4.0–11.0) | 8.0 (6.0–12.3) | 0.650 |
| Anti-Mullerian hormone level (ng/mL) | 1.3 (0.7–2.4) | 2.3 (1.1–4.0) | 0.013 * |
| Baseline serum CA-125 level (IU/L) (cases with existing endometrioma excluded) | 39.7 (19.2–79.4) | 35.5 (23.0–58.5) | 0.600 |
| Serum CA-125 level on the trigger day (IU/L) (cases with existing endometrioma excluded) | 29.5 (18.4–52.1) | 32.6 (18.9–53.2) | 0.761 |
| Ovarian stimulation protocol | |||
| GnRH antagonist | 106/152 (69.7) | 56/82 (68.3) | 0.883 |
| PPOS | 46/152 (30.2) | 26 (31.7) | |
| Total dose of gonadotrophins (IU) | 3000 (2475–3600) | 2700 (2250–3300) | 0.040 * |
| Number of oocytes retrieved | 6.0 (3.0–10.0) | 6.5 (4.0–13.0) | 0.094 |
| Fresh embryo transfer | 48/152 | 22/82 | 0.553 |
| Pregnancy rate in fresh IVF cycle | 16/48 (33.3) | 4/22 (18.2) | 0.170 |
| Live birth rate in fresh IVF cycle | 9/46 (19.6) | 0/21 (0) | 0.028 * |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Published by MDPI on behalf of the Lithuanian University of Health Sciences. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Chung, H.K.; Lai, S.F.; Wan, R.S.F.; Ko, J.K.Y.; Ng, E.H.Y.; Li, R.H.W. The Significance of Serum CA-125 Level on the Live Birth Rates of In Vitro Fertilisation in Women with Endometriosis. Medicina 2026, 62, 53. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62010053
Chung HK, Lai SF, Wan RSF, Ko JKY, Ng EHY, Li RHW. The Significance of Serum CA-125 Level on the Live Birth Rates of In Vitro Fertilisation in Women with Endometriosis. Medicina. 2026; 62(1):53. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62010053
Chicago/Turabian StyleChung, Hoi Ki, Shui Fan Lai, Rebecca Siu Fan Wan, Jennifer Ka Yee Ko, Ernest Hung Yu Ng, and Raymond Hang Wun Li. 2026. "The Significance of Serum CA-125 Level on the Live Birth Rates of In Vitro Fertilisation in Women with Endometriosis" Medicina 62, no. 1: 53. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62010053
APA StyleChung, H. K., Lai, S. F., Wan, R. S. F., Ko, J. K. Y., Ng, E. H. Y., & Li, R. H. W. (2026). The Significance of Serum CA-125 Level on the Live Birth Rates of In Vitro Fertilisation in Women with Endometriosis. Medicina, 62(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62010053

