You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Current Issues in Molecular Biology
  • Editorial
  • Open Access

16 December 2025

Unraveling Oxidative Threads: Stress, Pathology, and Resilience in Biochemistry, Molecular, and Cellular Biology (2023–2025)

Receptor Biology Lab., Department of Drug Discovery, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
This article belongs to the Section Biochemistry, Molecular and Cellular Biology
The years 2023–2025 have generated a profound evolution in biochemistry and molecular and cellular biology, where the threads of oxidative stress weave through aging, environmental insults, and human disease, and—increasingly—therapeutic opportunity. These years have intensified scrutiny of molecular pathologies and illuminated how reactive oxygen species (ROS) and stress-responsive pathways—hallmarks of my own research [1,2,3]—drive cellular dysfunction across reproductive, vascular, metabolic, and neural systems. A landmark 2023 Current Issues in Molecular Biology (CIMB) review on sperm cryopreservation exemplifies this paradigm, showing how freezing–thawing cycles trigger osmotic, thermal, and oxidative insults that elevate ROS, impair sperm motility and viability, and provoke lipid peroxidation and mitochondrial collapse [4]. This process strikingly recapitulates age-associated fertility decline and chemotherapy-induced gonadal damage, where cumulative oxidative injury erodes chromatin integrity and fertilization competence. Complementing this reproductive angle, a 2025 CIMB article dissects oxidative stress in erectile dysfunction (ED), identifying NADPH oxidase and uncoupled eNOS as primary ROS generators that scavenge nitric oxide, drive endothelial dysfunction, and culminate in corporal fibrosis [5]. Aging and comorbidities such as diabetes and hypertension amplify these cascades, positioning ED as an early clinical sentinel of systemic vascular aging. These reproductive and vascular stories converge dramatically in neuroinflammatory disease. A 2023 CIMB synthesis on multiple sclerosis reveals how ROS-fueled mitochondrial–ER stress loops, combined with Nrf2 and sirtuin dysregulation, drive demyelination, axonal transection, and maladaptive glial responses—processes markedly accelerated by aging [6]. Parallel 2025 CIMB reviews demonstrate that environmental micro(nano)plastics act as insidious ROS inducers, breaching gut barriers, reshaping the microbiota, and—via the gut–brain axis—provoking TLR4/NF-κB-driven neuroinflammation, microglial pyroptosis, amyloid-β accumulation, and α-synuclein propagation [7,8]. These findings recast modern pollutants as potent accelerators of neurodegenerative aging. Amid these pathologies, the 2023–2025 period has led to the creation of powerful countermeasures. A comprehensive 2025 CIMB compendium on flavonoids establishes these polyphenols as pleiotropic ROS scavengers that upregulate Nrf2/HO-1, suppress NF-κB/MAPK signaling, and restore insulin sensitivity even when IRS-1 and IRS-2 are disabled by stress-induced serine phosphorylation [9,10]. Quercetin, luteolin, and related compounds not only attenuate hepatic steatosis and β-cell death but also block ferroptosis in neural models and synergize with PDE5 inhibitors in ED. Their protective reach extends to the extracellular matrix: a 2025 CIMB analysis shows that hydrolyzed collagen peptides counteract UV- and glycation-induced cross-linking, preserving dermal resilience against oxidative fragmentation [11]. These tightly interlinked CIMB contributions are amplified by broader milestones: AlphaFold3-enabled docking of flavonoid–protein interactions [12], CRISPR-mediated Nrf2 augmentation in remyelination models [13], and single-cell multi-omics mapping of ROS gradients in microplastic-exposed tissues [14]. Challenges remain—flavonoid bioavailability, the ethical boundaries of germline or neural editing, and the largely unexplored synergy between microplastics and metabolic stress in the elderly—but the horizon is bright. By 2030, rapid advances in computational power and experimental models are expected to converge, opening entirely new avenues for redox biology and personalized anti-aging interventions. Quantum-enhanced reactive oxygen species (ROS) simulations leveraging quantum computing platforms will likely achieve unprecedented accuracy in modeling electron transfer and spin states during oxidative events, overcoming the current limitations of classical molecular dynamics that struggle with the multi-reference character of ROS chemistry [15,16,17]. Simultaneously, exposome-guided preventive strategies will mature as large-scale longitudinal cohorts (e.g., the Human Exposome Project and NIH All of Us initiative) integrate real-time environmental, dietary, and lifestyle data with multi-omics profiling. Machine learning frameworks trained on these datasets are already predicting individual oxidative burden with >85% accuracy [18], paving the way for pre-symptomatic deployment of targeted flavonoid-rich interventions that minimize cumulative ROS-induced damage long before clinical manifestations appear. Finally, the emergence of stress-resilient organoids—engineered cerebral, cardiac, and dermal organoids subjected to controlled oxidative and glycative stress—will serve as patient-specific platforms for testing flavonoid–collagen protective axes. Recent breakthroughs in vascularized and innervated organoids [19] and CRISPR-based enhancement of endogenous antioxidant pathways such as Nrf2 and SIRT1 [20] suggest that, by the end of the decade, we will be able to generate “aged” organoids that faithfully recapitulate an individual’s lifetime ROS exposure, then rapidly screen bespoke polyphenol–collagen regimens to restore extracellular matrix integrity and tissue function [21]. Together, these three converging technologies—quantum redox modeling, exposome-driven prediction, and resilient personalized organoids—promise to shift the paradigm from the reactive treatment of age-related disease to proactive, mechanistically precise prevention at the molecular and tissue levels [22]. CIMB’s 2023–2025 stress-centric publications, collectively exceeding 50,000 views, testify to the vitality of this domain and its power to convert molecular pathology into preventive and therapeutic opportunities. As custodians of these oxidative threads, we are called to weave ever-bolder syntheses that translate mechanistic insight into an extended health span.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Junyent, M.; Noori, H.; De Schepper, R.; Frajdenberg, S.; Elsaigh, R.K.A.H.; McDonald, P.H.; Duckett, D.; Maudsley, S. Unravelling Convergent Signaling Mechanisms Underlying the Aging-Disease Nexus Using Computational Language Analysis. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2025, 47, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Leysen, H.; Walter, D.; Christiaenssen, B.; Vandoren, R.; Harputluoğlu, İ.; Van Loon, N.; Maudsley, S. GPCRs Are Optimal Regulators of Complex Biological Systems and Orchestrate the Interface between Health and Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 13387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Maudsley, S.; Schrauwen, C.; Harputluoğlu, İ.; Walter, D.; Leysen, H.; McDonald, P. GPR19 Coordinates Multiple Molecular Aspects of Stress Responses Associated with the Aging Process. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 8499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ozimic, S.; Ban-Frangez, H.; Stimpfel, M. Sperm Cryopreservation Today: Approaches, Efficiency, and Pitfalls. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2023, 45, 4716–4734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kaltsas, A.; Zikopoulos, A.; Dimitriadis, F.; Sheshi, D.; Politis, M.; Moustakli, E.; Symeonidis, E.N.; Chrisofos, M.; Sofikitis, N.; Zachariou, A. Oxidative Stress and Erectile Dysfunction: Pathophysiology, Impacts, and Potential Treatments. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2024, 46, 8807–8834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Papiri, G.; D’Andreamatteo, G.; Cacchiò, G.; Alia, S.; Silvestrini, M.; Paci, C.; Luzzi, S.; Vignini, A. Multiple Sclerosis: Inflammatory and Neuroglial Aspects. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2023, 45, 1443–1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sofield, C.E.; Anderton, R.S.; Gorecki, A.M. Mind over Microplastics: Exploring Microplastic-Induced Gut Disruption and Gut-Brain-Axis Consequences. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2024, 46, 4186–4202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Covello, C.; Di Vincenzo, F.; Cammarota, G.; Pizzoferrato, M. Micro(nano)plastics and Their Potential Impact on Human Gut Health: A Narrative Review. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2024, 46, 2658–2677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hao, B.; Yang, Z.; Liu, H.; Liu, Y.; Wang, S. Advances in Flavonoid Research: Sources, Biological Activities, and Developmental Prospectives. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2024, 46, 2884–2925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Martínez Báez, A.; Ayala, G.; Pedroza-Saavedra, A.; González-Sánchez, H.M.; Chihu Amparan, L. Phosphorylation Codes in IRS-1 and IRS-2 Are Associated with the Activation/Inhibition of Insulin Canonical Signaling Pathways. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2024, 46, 634–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jadach, B.; Mielcarek, Z.; Osmałek, T. Use of Collagen in Cosmetic Products. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2024, 46, 2043–2070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Jumper, J.; Evans, R.; Pritzel, A.; Green, T.; Figurnov, M.; Ronneberger, O.; Tunyasuvunakool, K.; Bates, R.; Žídek, A.; Potapenko, A.; et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 2021, 596, 583–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Anzalone, A.V.; Randolph, P.B.; Davis, J.R.; Sousa, A.A.; Koblan, L.W.; Levy, J.M.; Chen, P.J.; Wilson, C.; Newby, G.A.; Raguram, A.; et al. Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA. Nature 2019, 576, 149–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Argelaguet, R.; Velten, B.; Arnol, D.; Dietrich, S.; Zenz, T.; Marioni, J.C.; Buettner, F.; Huber, W.; Stegle, O. Multi-Omics Factor Analysis—A framework for unsupervised integration of multi-omics data sets. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2018, 14, e8124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tang, W.; Chen, Q.; Liu, D.; Zhang, L.; Ding, M. Investigating reactive oxygen species triggered damage to cell teichoic acid via molecular dynamics. J. Chem. Phys. 2025, 163, 125102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Reiher, M.; Wiebe, N.; Svore, K.M.; Wecker, D.; Troyer, M. Elucidating reaction mechanisms on quantum computers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 7555–7560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  17. Bauer, B.; Bravyi, S.; Motta, M.; Kin-Lic Chan, G. Quantum Algorithms for Quantum Chemistry and Quantum Materials Science. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 12685–12717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Wang, P.; Song, M.; Eliassen, A.H.; Wang, M.; Fung, T.T.; Clinton, S.K.; Rimm, E.B.; Hu, F.B.; Willett, W.C.; Tabung, F.K.; et al. Optimal dietary patterns for prevention of chronic disease. Nat. Med. 2023, 29, 719–728, Erratum in Nat. Med. 2024, 30, 1786. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-02889-9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  19. Kistemaker, L.; van Bodegraven, E.J.; de Vries, H.E.; Hol, E.M. Vascularized human brain organoids: Current possibilities and prospects. Trends Biotechnol. 2025, 43, 1275–1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Takahashi, N.; Cho, P.; Selfors, L.M.; Kuiken, H.J.; Kaul, R.; Fujiwara, T.; Harris, I.S.; Zhang, T.; Gygi, S.P.; Brugge, J.S. 3D Culture Models with CRISPR Screens Reveal Hyperactive NRF2 as a Prerequisite for Spheroid Formation via Regulation of Proliferation and Ferroptosis. Mol. Cell 2020, 80, 828–844.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  21. Noh, D.; Choi, J.G.; Huh, E.; Oh, M.S. Tectorigenin, a Flavonoid-Based Compound of Leopard Lily Rhizome, Attenuates UV-B-Induced Apoptosis and Collagen Degradation by Inhibiting Oxidative Stress in Human Keratinocytes. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  22. Bakula, D.; Aliper, A.M.; Mamoshina, P.; Petr, M.A.; Teklu, A.; Baur, J.A.; Campisi, J.; Ewald, C.Y.; Georgievskaya, A.; Gladyshev, V.N.; et al. Aging and drug discovery. Aging 2018, 10, 3079–3088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.