Next Article in Journal
Correction: Senceroglu et al. Constructing an Intelligent Model Based on Support Vector Regression to Simulate the Solubility of Drugs in Polymeric Media. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 1405
Previous Article in Journal
Hitting the Target: Model-Informed Precision Dosing of Tobramycin in Pediatric Patients with Cystic Fibrosis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pharmaceuticals
Volume 19
Issue 1
10.3390/ph19010151
pharmaceuticals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Investigation on N-Aryl-2-(4-sulfamoylphenyl)hydrazine-1-carbothioamide as Human Carbonic Anhydrases Inhibitors

by
Morteza Abdoli
1,
Andrea Angeli
2,
Alessandro Bonardi
2,3,
Paola Gratteri
3,
Ludmila Jackevica
1,
Antons Sizovs
1,4,
Claudiu T. Supuran
2 and
Raivis Žalubovskis
1,5,*
1
Latvian Institute of Organic Synthesis, LV-1006 Riga, Latvia
2
Department of Neurofarba, Università degli Studi di Firenze, 50019 Florence, Italy
3
Pharmaceutical and Nutraceutical Section and Laboratory of Molecular Modeling Cheminformatics & QSAR, Department of NEUROFARBA, University of Florence, Via U. Schiff 6, Sesto Fiorentino, 50019 Florence, Italy
4
Baltic Biomaterials Centre of Excellence, Headquarters at Riga Technical University, LV-1048 Riga, Latvia
5
Institute of Chemistry and Chemical Technology, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Technology, Riga Technical University, LV-1048 Riga, Latvia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceuticals 2026, 19(1), 151; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph19010151
Submission received: 9 December 2025 / Revised: 8 January 2026 / Accepted: 11 January 2026 / Published: 14 January 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Medicinal Chemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

Background: Among the 15 human (h) carbonic anhydrase (CA; EC 4.2.1.1) isoforms, hCA IX and XII are particularly important due to their roles in tumor cell growth and survival, identifying them as promising targets for anticancer therapy. As a result, considerable effort has been directed toward the development of novel inhibitors that are highly selective for these isoforms. Methods: A library of twelve novel N-aryl-2-(4-sulfamoylphenyl)hydrazine-1-carbothioamides 3 along with two new N-aryl-2-(4-sulfamoylphenyl)hydrazine-1-carboxamide derivatives 5 were synthesized and their inhibition abilities were tested against four human carbonic anhydrase isozymes (hCA I, II, IX and XII) related to some global diseases including glaucoma, cancer and osteoporosis. Results: All compounds exhibited potent inhibition of the tested isoforms in the nanomolar range. Compound 3i showed the highest inhibition of hCA I activity but demonstrated poor selectivity toward the other isoforms. Compound 3h displayed superior selectivity for hCA II over hCA I (hCA I/II = 37) and exhibited 2.5-fold higher inhibitory activity compared to acetazolamide (AAZ). Among the tested compounds, 3l (Ki = 32.1 nM) demonstrated markedly improved selectivity for hCA IX over hCA I, II, and XII relative to the standard drug. Notably, compound 3a showed the most potent inhibition against hCA XII (Ki = 6.8 nM), comparable to AAZ, while exhibiting significantly greater selectivity over off-target isoforms and the other tumor-associated isozyme (hCA IX/XII = 20 versus hCA IX/XII = 4.5 for AAZ). Conclusions: The present study suggests potent lead compounds as selective hCA IX and XII inhibitors with anticancer activity.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Carbonic anhydrases (CAs, EC 4.2.1.1) comprise a family of lyase enzymes that are widely distributed across living organisms [1]. To date, 15 isoforms of CA have been discovered in humans and among them, 12 isoforms (CA I–IV, VA–VB, VI–VII, IX, and XII–XIV) possess zinc in their active site and exhibit catalytic activity [2]. The catalytic activity of these isoforms is identical (facilitating the reversible hydration of carbon dioxide and water into protons and bicarbonate); however, they differ in oligomeric arrangement, cellular localization, tissue distribution, expression levels, and kinetic properties [3]. The CA-catalyzed reaction is involved in numerous physiological processes across various tissues and cellular compartments, including respiration, pH regulation, electrolyte transport, and metabolism [4]. Abnormal levels or activity of CAs can lead to various pathological conditions related to pH buffering, metabolism, signaling, and other processes [5]. Therefore, the selective inhibition of specific CA isoforms is considered as a promising therapeutic approach for diseases resulting from their abnormal activity [6]. In this context, the crucial role of plasma membrane-associated CA isoforms, CA IX and CA XII, in tumor progression, acidification, and metastasis has positioned them as significant therapeutic targets for cancer [7,8].
Among the various pharmacophores reported as Zn-binding groups that can fit/block the active site of CAs, sulfonamides are the most effective group in both marketed and reported CA inhibitors (CAIs) (Figure 1) [9,10]. However, they are often associated with severe side effects due to their poor selectivity and potent binding to multiple CA isoforms [11]. Therefore, further structural modifications are necessary to develop more effective and truly selective CAIs.
Intriguingly, recent studies have shown that incorporating (thio)urea moieties into sulfonamide-containing compounds leads to CAIs with enhanced efficiency and selectivity [12,13,14,15]. For example (Figure 2), 4-(3-((3,4-dichlorophenyl)carbamoyl)thioureido)benzenesulfonamide I having acyl thiourea moiety has been demonstrated as an efficient in vitro inhibitor of Plasmodium falciparum CA (PfaCA) [16], while sulfonamide II which contains a thiourea moiety, has been identified as a potent inhibitor of CA IX [17]. More interestingly, SLC-0111, an unsymmetrical disubstituted urea derivative, is the only CA IX inhibitor that has successfully completed Phase I clinical trials [18,19,20].
Keeping these interesting findings in mind and continuing our research on the field of CAIs [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30], herein, we aimed to design and synthesize a series of novel N-aryl-2-(4-sulfamoylphenyl)hydrazine-1-carbothioamides and evaluate their inhibitory activity against four human (h)CA isoforms, hCA I, II, IX and XII (Figure 3).

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Synthesis

A panel of twelve novel N-aryl-2-(4-sulfamoylphenyl)hydrazine-1-carbothioamide derivatives 3 were prepared by reaction of (4-sulfamoylphenyl)hydrazine hydrochloride 1 with equimolar quantities of respective aryl isothiocyanates 2 in acetonitrile under basic conditions (Scheme 1a). Two new N-aryl-2-(4-sulfamoylphenyl)hydrazine-1-carboxamides 5a and 5b were similarly synthesized by reaction of (4-sulfamoylphenyl)hydrazine hydrochloride 1 with aryl isocyanates 4 (Scheme 1b). The structures of the target compounds were confirmed by spectroscopic methods (1H NMR, 13C NMR and HRMS).

2.2. Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibition

All newly synthesized N-aryl-2-(4-sulfamoylphenyl)hydrazine-1-carbothioamides (3a–3l) were evaluated for their capacity to suppress four physiologically relevant hCA isoforms (hCA I, hCA II, hCA IX, and CA XII), which have been defined as drug targets. The evaluation was conducted using a stopped-flow CO2 hydrase assay [31], with acetazolamide (AAZ) serving as the standard inhibitor (Table 1).
According to the data in Table 1, the structure–activity relationships (SAR) of the titled compounds can be summarized as follows:
(i)
The slow cytosolic isoform hCA I was effectively inhibited by all newly developed sulfonamides 3a–3l with inhibition constants (Ki) ranging from 7.7 nM to 0.7 µM, spanning low nanomolar to very low micromolar levels. A 91-fold variation across the series indicates that the inhibitory potency of this class of compounds is greatly influenced by the nature and position of substituents on the phenyl ring periphery of substrates. Overall, the relative inhibitory activity of the tested compounds followed the order: meta-substituted ≥ para-substituted > ortho-substituted derivatives. Regarding the nature of the substituents, a comparison of differently functionalized para-substituted derivatives revealed that compounds bearing a 4-nitro group (a hydroneutral moiety capable of forming hydrogen bonds) exhibited superior inhibitory potency compared to those with 4-alkyl substituents, which in turn outperformed the 4-halo-substituted analogs.
(ii)
The physiologically relevant and ubiquitous cytosolic isoform hCA II was strongly inhibited by all investigated compounds of type 3 with Ki ranging from 4.3 to 78.8 nM compared to the standard AAZ with Ki value of 12.1 nM. Notably, two-thirds of these compounds exhibited superior inhibitory activity compared to the reference drug. Compound 3i showed the best inhibition against hCA II with a Ki of 4.3 nM, which was almost 3-fold higher than that of AAZ. The SAR showed that ortho-substituted derivatives displayed weakest inhibitory capability against this isoform, similar to the trend observed for hCA I.
(iii)
The tumor-associated transmembrane isoform hCA IX was inhibited strongly to moderately by all synthesized compounds 3a–3l, with Ki values ranging from 23.9 to 251.0 nM, compared to standard AAZ (25.7 nM). The results showed that the nature of the substituents had a greater impact on the inhibitory activity against this isoform than their position on the aromatic ring. The five most potent compounds were 3e, 3h, 3i, 3k and 3l with very low nanomolar Ki values 27.5, 31.2, 23.9, 68.7 and 32.1 nM, respectively. Interestingly, in these five molecules, R was a halide group (Cl or Br).
(iv)
The other tumor-associated transmembrane isoform hCA XII was also effectively inhibited by all of the tested sulfonamides 3 with Ki values only differing by 4-fold and ranging between 5.5 and 23.1 nM. Here, no significant differences in inhibitory potency were observed among the molecules with different substituents. Compound 3f displayed the best inhibition against this isoform, equal to that of AAZ, but significantly more selective over the other tumor-associated isoform hCA IX (hCA IX/XIII = 22) compared to AAZ (hCA IX/XIII = 4.5).
To compare the inhibitory potency of the newly developed compounds 3 with their urea analogues, two N-aryl-2-(4-sulfamoylphenyl)hydrazine-1-carboxamides 5 were synthesized and evaluated against the same set of isoforms (Table 2).
The results showed that both N-aryl-2-(4-sulfamoylphenyl)hydrazine-1-carboxamide derivatives 5a and 5b effectively inhibited all four tested isoforms, and they demonstrated potencies nearly equivalent to those of their corresponding carbothioamide analogues, 3a and 3b.

2.3. In Silico Studies

To investigate the binding mode of compound 3l, the most selective of the series in respect of both target isoforms CA IX and CA XII compared to the cytosolic hCA I and II (hCA I/IX = 21.8; hCA II/IX = 2.5; hCA I/XII = 73.6; hCA II/XII = 8.3), combined docking and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were performed.
As reported in the literature [32,33,34,35], all docking solutions placed the benzenesulfonamide moiety deeply within the active site, coordinating the zinc ion through the deprotonated sulfonamide nitrogen (SO2NH−) and completing the metal tetrahedral coordination sphere with H94, H96, and H119 in both isoforms. This coordination is further stabilized by two H-bonds between the sulfonamide NH− and S=O groups and the side-chain OH and backbone NH of T199, respectively.
The best score docking poses were subjected to 200 ns-long MD simulations to explore the time-dependent evolution of ligand–target interactions (Figure 4 and Figure 5).
In CA IX, ligand 3l maintained an RMSD of ~4.4 Å for the first 130 ns, before fluctuating and stabilizing at ~3.9 Å for the rest of the simulation (Figure 4A). Two major binding mode clusters were identified (Figure 4B,C): the first persisted for 36.1% of the trajectory (Figure 4B,D), while the second was more abundant (54.0%) and representative (Figure 4C,D).
As shown in Figure 4E, the binding mode of the sulfonamide group remained stable throughout the 200-ns trajectory (100%), both in terms of Zn2+ coordination and hydrogen bonding with T199. In addition, hydrophobic van der Waals (vdW) interactions of the benzenesulfonamide ring with H94 (~11%), V121 (~7%), and L198 (~50%) contributed to stabilizing its orientation within the binding pocket.
In the first cluster (Figure 4B,E), the sulfonamide binding mode was further reinforced by a water-bridged hydrogen bond between the sulfonamide NH− and the sidechain OH of T200, as well as by an H-bond network involving the sidechain NH2 of Q92. The dichlorobenzene ring was oriented toward a hydrophobic pocket defined by T69, L91, and the aliphatic chain of Q92, occasionally forming halogen bond with the backbone C=O of L91 (~2%).
In the second, more abundant cluster (Figure 4C,E), the C=S group of the hydrazine-1-carbothioamide linker engaged an H-bond with the backbone C=O of P201, either directly (~23% of the trajectory) or water-mediated (~17%). This interaction was further stabilized by an additional water molecule bridging the linker nitrogen to the sidechain OH of T200 (~11%). The dichlorobenzene ring was oriented within a more lipophilic pocket defined by L91, V121, V131, L141, and V143, establishing vdW contacts with L91 (~5%) and V131 (~25%), as well as halogen bonds with the backbone C=O of L91 (~2%), V121 (~1%), and H122 (~2%).
In CA XII, ligand 3l quickly stabilized at an RMSD of ~5.7 Å and maintained this value throughout the 200 ns-long MD simulation (Figure 5A), giving rise to three main binding clusters (Figure 5B–D). The first cluster, which formed early, was also the most persistent (52.7%, Figure 5B,E), fluctuating around a second (13.7%, Figure 5C,E) and a third (22.6%, Figure 5D,E) cluster related conformations.
As in CA IX, the sulfonamide binding mode remained fully stable during the 200 ns MD trajectory (100%), both in terms of Zn2+ coordination and hydrogen bonding with T199 (Figure 5F). Additional vdW contacts between the benzenesulfonamide ring and H94 (~20%), V121 (~16%), and L198 (~69%) further stabilized its orientation within the active site.
In the first cluster (Figure 5B,F), the orientation of the hydrazine-1-carbothioamide linker was stabilized by a bidentate water-bridged hydrogen bond involving both the C=S and –N= groups with the backbone C=O of P201 (~46%). In some cases, the C=S group formed a direct H-bond with the backbone C=O of the residue (~5%). Moreover, water-mediated hydrogen-bonding networks connected the sulfonamide NH− and the 2-chloro substituent to N62, Q92, and T200, as well as the 4-chloro substituent to S132 and N136.
In the second, less persistent cluster (Figure 5C,F), the benzenesulfonamide ring underwent distortion to engage in π–π stacking with H94 (~17%). This rearrangement enabled the 2-chloro atom to form a water-bridged hydrogen bond with the sidechain NH2 of Q92 and the protonated NH3+ group of the peculiar K67. Again, extended water-mediated hydrogen-bonding networks anchored the ligand to S65, T91, and P201.
In the third cluster (Figure 5D,F), the canonical orientation of the sulfonamide ring was restored, while the dichlorobenzene ring shifted toward residue K67, forming a strong π-cation interaction (~23%). The hydrazine-1-carbothioamide linker was further stabilized by a hydrogen-bonding network involving water molecules bridging the =N– group to the sidechains of T200 and Q92.
Overall, the selectivity of ligand 3l can be rationalized by its ability to establish strong and stable interactions within the less sterically hindered active sites of CA IX and CA XII—sites that are more restricted in CA I/II due to the presence of A131/F131 and F91/I91. Additionally, unlike other ligands in the series, compound 3l exploits both chlorine substituents to form weak H-bonds or halogen bonds with isoform-specific residues, contributing to its distinct binding profile.

2.4. Cytotoxicity Studies

The in vitro cytotoxicity of two representative carbothioamides 3a the most selective inhibitor of hCA XII, and 3l, the most potent inhibitor of both tumor-associated isoforms was evaluated in six human cancer cell lines (MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-435, PANC-1, U-118, A2780 and A549) after 48 h of exposure, giving IC50 values in the 31.4–89.6 µM range, with 3l generally more potent than 3a in MDA-MB-231, U-118, A2780 and A549 cells (Table 3). These micromolar IC50 values are in line with those reported for many sulfonamide CA inhibitors with anticancer activity, which typically exhibit low- to mid-micromolar anti-proliferative.
Importantly, CA IX and CA XII are overexpressed in hypoxic, aggressive tumors where they regulate extracellular pH, promote invasion and metastasis, and correlate with poor prognosis. Selective inhibition of these tumor-associated isoforms is considered a promising anticancer strategy. In contrast, the ubiquitously expressed cytosolic isoforms CA I and CA II are regarded as off-target isoforms whose inhibition can sequester non-selective CAIs and contribute to systemic side effects, underscoring the need for isoform-selective agents.
Compounds 3a and 3l combine low-nanomolar inhibition of the tumor-associated CA isoforms (Table 2) with micromolar-range cytotoxicity (Table 3), placing their cellular effects within the range reported for other CA IX/XII-directed sulfonamides and indicating that the target isoforms can be efficiently inhibited at concentrations where non-specific cytotoxicity remains moderate.
It is worth to stress that synthesis of N-aryl-2-(4-sulfamoylphenyl)hydrazine-1-carbothioamides 3 is not reported in the literature. Moreover, our results demonstrate the potency on these compounds as effective and surprisingly selective inhibitors of CAs with potency for treatment of cancer.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials and Methods

All reagents and solvents were obtained from commercial suppliers (Sigma-Aldrich, Burlington, MA, USA, BLDpharm, Shanghai, China, TCI, Tokyo, Japan, Enamine, Kyiv, Ukraine, and Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and were used without any further purification. Analytical TLC was carried out on MERCK precoated silica gel F254 aluminum plates using a methanol–dichloromethane mixture as the eluent, and reaction progress was monitored under UV light. The 1H and 13C NMR spectra (see the Supporting Information) were recorded in DMSO-d6 on Bruker Avance spectrometer at 400 and 100 MHz, respectively, using deuterated dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO-d6) and Me4Si (TMS) as internal standard at room temperature, and can be find in Supporting Information. High-resolution mass spectra (HRMS) were attained on a mass spectrometer with a Q-TOF micro mass analyzer using the electrospray ionization (ESI) technique.
MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-435, PANC-1, U-118, A2780, and A549 human cancer cell lines were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) and maintained according to the supplier’s recommendations. Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) and fetal bovine serum (FBS) were purchased from ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA). Penicillin and streptomycin were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (MA, USA). MTT reagent (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) was purchased from TCI EUROPE N.V. (Zwijndrecht, Belgium).

3.2. CA Inhibitory Assay

An Applied Photophysics stopped-flow instrument was used to assay the CA catalyzed CO2 hydration activity [31]. Phenol red (at a concentration of 0.2 mM) was used as an indicator, working at the absorbance maximum of 557 nm, with 20 mM Hepes (pH 7.4) as a buffer, and 20 mM Na2SO4 (to maintain constant ionic strength), following the initial rates of the CA-catalyzed CO2 hydration reaction for a period of 10–100 s. The CO2 concentrations ranged from 1.7 to 17 mM for the determination of the kinetic parameters and inhibition constants [6]. Enzyme concentrations ranged between 5–12 nM. For each inhibitor, at least six traces of the initial 5–10% of the reaction were used to determine the initial velocity. The uncatalyzed rates were determined in the same manner and subtracted from the total observed rates. Stock solutions of the inhibitor (0.1 mM) were prepared in distilled–deionized water and dilutions up to 0.01 nM were done thereafter with the assay buffer. Inhibitor and enzyme solutions were preincubated together for 15 min at room temperature prior to the assay, to allow for the formation of the E–I complex. The inhibition constants were obtained by non-linear least-squares methods using PRISM 3 and the Cheng–Prusoff equation as reported earlier and represent the mean from at least three different determinations. All CA isoforms were recombinant proteins obtained in house, as reported earlier [36,37].

3.3. In Silico Studies

The crystal structures of hCA IX (PDB 5FL4) [34] and hCA XII (PDB 1JD0) [35] were downloaded from the Protein Data Bank (RCSB.org) [38] and prepared using the Protein Preparation module implemented in the Maestro Schrödinger suite [39], assigning bond orders, adding hydrogens, deleting water molecules, and optimizing H-bonding networks. Finally, energy minimization with a Root Means Square Deviation (RMSD) value of 0.30 was applied using an Optimized Potential for Liquid Simulation (OPLS4) force field [39,40,41,42]. The 3D ligand structures were prepared by Maestro [39] (a) and evaluated for their ionization states at pH 7.3 ± 1.0 with Epik [39] (b). The conjugate gradient method in Macromodel [39] (c) was used for energy minimization. Grids for docking were centered on the centroid of the complexed ligand. 3D ligand structures were prepared by Maestro [39] (a). Docking studies were carried out with the program Glide [39] (d) using the standard precision (SP) mode. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were performed using Desmond Molecular Dynamics System (v.7.0) [39] (e) and OPLS4 force field. The MD simulation protocol included a starting relaxation step followed by a final production phase of 200 ns. Protein RMSD, ligand RMSD/RMSF (Root Mean Square Fluctuation), ligand torsions evolution, and occurrence of intermolecular H-bonds and hydrophobic contacts were provided by the Simulation Interaction Diagram (SID) implemented in Maestro, along with the production phase of the MD simulation. The 1000 frames resulting from MDs were clustered using the Conformer Cluster tool implemented in the Schrödinger suite into 10 clusters. Figures were generated with Maestro and Chimera [39,43].

3.4. Cell Culture and MTT Cell Viability Assay

Cells were seeded at a density of 1000 cells per well in 96-well plates and cultured in DMEM (MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-435, PANC-1, U-118, A549) or RPMI medium (A2780) supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS, 100 µg/mL penicillin, and 100 µg/mL streptomycin. Cultures were maintained at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. After 24 h of incubation to allow cell attachment, the medium was replaced with fresh medium containing the tested compounds at final concentrations ranging 3.9–500 µM (n = 6 wells per concentration). Following 48 h of exposure, the medium was aspirated and cell viability was assessed using the MTT assay. Cells incubated with complete growth medium in the absence of test compound served as the negative control, cells treated with 0.1% saponin for 30 min prior to the MTT assay served as the positive (cytotoxic) control.
MTT results were analyzed using GraphPad Prism v.10.3.1 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) and IC50 values were obtained by fitting the viability data with a four-parameter logistic (4PL) sigmoidal non-linear regression model.

4. Conclusions

CAs are well known to be involved in various diseases such as cancer, glaucoma, brain edema, altitude sickness, epilepsy, and obesity have become specific targets in drug designing. The potential of (thio)urea-substituted benzene sulfonamide derivatives as isoform selective CAIs led us to synthesize a novel series of twelve N-aryl-2-(4-sulfamoylphenyl)hydrazine-1-carbothioamides 3 along with two new N-aryl-2-(4-sulfamoylphenyl)hydrazine-1-carboxamide derivatives 5 to evaluate their effect on four hCA isozymes (hCA I, II, IX and XII). Kinetic studies revealed that all compounds exhibited strong inhibition against the tested isozymes in the nanomolar range. Compound 3i demonstrated the highest inhibition of hCA I activity but showed poor selectivity towards the other three isozymes. Compound 3h displayed superior selectivity against hCA II vs. hCA I (hCA I/II = 37), while it showed 2.5-fold higher inhibitory activity against this isozyme compared to AAZ. Among the tested compounds, compound 3l (with Ki = 32.1) displayed much better selectivity against hCA IX vs. hCA I, II, and XII compared to the standard drug. On the other hand, compound 3a displayed the most potent inhibition against hCA XII with a Ki of 6.8 nM, comparable to that of AAZ, while demonstrating significantly greater selectivity over off-target isoforms and over the other tumor-associated isozyme (hCAIX/XII = 20) compared to AAZ (hCA IX/XII = 4.5). The combined docking and MD studies revealed that the high selectivity of ligand 3l toward tumor-associated isoforms arises from its ability to establish strong and stable interactions within the less sterically hindered active sites of CA IX and CA XII. In addition, both of its distinctive chlorine substituents contribute by forming weak hydrogen or halogen bonds with isoform-specific residues. Based on these findings, these compounds could serve as a starting point for the development of isoform-selective hCAIs, particularly for highly effective and selective molecules targeting cytosolic hCA II and tumor-associated hCA XII.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ph19010151/s1, Experimental procedures for the synthesis of inhibitors; 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra of inhibitors; High resolution mass spectra of inhibitors.

Author Contributions

All authors were involved in the conception and design studied molecules. M.A. performed the synthesis and inhibition studies. M.A. and R.Ž. performed the analysis and interpretation of data for the synthesized compounds. C.T.S. performed the interpretation of inhibition data. L.J. and A.S. performed cell viability studies and interpretation. A.B. and P.G. performed in silico studies and interpretation. M.A. and R.Ž. drafted the paper. A.A. performed critical revising of the paper for the intellectual content and the final approval of the version to be published. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the funding from the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) project No. 5.2.1.1.i.0/2/24/I/CFLA/001 grant Nr. 40/OSI/ZG.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. DiMario, R.J.; Machingura, M.C.; Waldrop, G.L.; Moroney, J.V. The many types of carbonic anhydrases in photosynthetic organisms. Plant Sci. 2018, 268, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Pinard, M.A.; Mahon, B.; McKenna, R. Probing the surface of human carbonic anhydrase for clues towards the design of isoform specific inhibitors. BioMed Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 453543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hassan, M.I.; Shajee, B.; Waheed, A.; Ahmad, F.; Sly, W.S. Structure, function and applications of carbonic anhydrase isozymes. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2013, 21, 1570–1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Aspatwar, A.; Tolvanen, M.E.; Barker, H.; Syrjänen, L.; Valanne, S.; Purmonen, S.; Waheed, A.; Sly, W.S.; Parkkila, S. Carbonic anhydrases in metazoan model organisms: Molecules, mechanisms, and physiology. Physiol. Rev. 2022, 102, 1327–1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zamanova, S.; Shabana, A.M.; Mondal, U.K.; Ilies, M.A. Carbonic anhydrases as disease markers. Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 2019, 29, 509–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Supuran, C.T. Carbonic anhydrases: Novel therapeutic applications for inhibitors and activators. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2008, 7, 168–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. McDonald, P.C.; Chafe, S.C.; Supuran, C.T.; Dedhar, S. Cancer Therapeutic Targeting of Hypoxia Induced Carbonic Anhydrase IX: From Bench to Bedside. Cancers 2022, 14, 3297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Nerella, S.G.; Singh, P.; Arifuddin, M.; Supuran, C.T. Anticancer carbonic anhydrase inhibitors: A patent and literature update 2018–2022. Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 2022, 32, 833–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Carta, F.; Supuran, C.T.; Scozzafava, A. Sulfonamides and their isosters as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. Future Med. Chem. 2014, 6, 1149–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Swenson, E.R. New insights into carbonic anhydrase inhibition, vasodilation, and treatment of hypertensive-related diseases. Curr. Hypertens. Rep. 2014, 16, 467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Abdoli, M.; De Luca, V.; Capasso, C.; Supuran, C.T.; Žalubovskis, R. Inhibition Studies on Carbonic Anhydrase Isoforms I, II, IX, and XII with a Series of Sulfaguanidines. ChemMedChem 2023, 18, e202200658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Lomelino, C.L.; Mahon, B.P.; McKenna, R.; Carta, F.; Supuran, C.T. Novel 3,4-diarylpyrazolines as potent cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonists with lower lipophilicity. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2016, 24, 976–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Serbian, I.; Schwarzenberger, P.; Loesche, A.; Hoenke, S.; Al-Harrasi, A.; Csuk, R. Ureidobenzenesulfonamides as efficient inhibitors of carbonic anhydrase II. Bioorg. Chem. 2019, 91, 103123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Abdoli, M.; Bonardi, A.; Paoletti, N.; Aspatwar, A.; Parkkila, S.; Gratteri, P.; Supuran, C.T.; Žalubovskis, R. Inhibition Studies on Human and Mycobacterial Carbonic Anhydrases with N-((4-Sulfamoylphenyl)carbamothioyl) Amides. Molecules 2023, 28, 4020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Abdoli, M.; Bonardi, A.; Supuran, C.T.; Žalubovskis, R. Investigation of novel alkyl/benzyl (4-sulphamoylphenyl)carbamimidothioates as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2023, 38, 2152811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Krungkrai, J.; Krungkrai, S.R.; Supuran, C.T. Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors: Inhibition of Plasmodium falciparum carbonic anhydrase with aromatic/heterocyclic sulfonamides—In vitro and in vivo studies. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 5466–5471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cecchi, A.; Hulikova, A.; Pastorek, J.; Pastoreková, S.; Scozzafava, A.; Winum, J.Y.; Montero, J.L.; Supuran, C.T. Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. Design of fluorescent sulfonamides as probes of tumor-associated carbonic anhydrase IX that inhibit isozyme IX-mediated acidification of hypoxic tumors. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 4834–4841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Andreucci, E.; Ruzzolini, J.; Peppicelli, S.; Bianchini, F.; Laurenzana, A.; Carta, F.; Supuran, C.T.; Calorini, L. The carbonic anhydrase IX inhibitor SLC-0111 sensitises cancer cells to conventional chemotherapy. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2019, 34, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. McDonald, P.C.; Chia, S.; Bedard, P.L.; Chu, Q.; Lyle, M.; Tang, L.; Singh, M.; Zhang, Z.; Supuran, C.T.; Renouf, D.J.; et al. A Phase 1 Study of SLC-0111, a Novel Inhibitor of Carbonic Anhydrase IX, in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors. Am. J. Clin. Oncol. 2020, 43, 484–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Eloranta, K.; Pihlajoki, M.; Liljeström, E.; Nousiainen, R.; Soini, T.; Lohi, J.; Cairo, S.; Wilson, D.B.; Parkkila, S.; Heikinheimo, M. SLC-0111, an inhibitor of carbonic anhydrase IX, attenuates hepatoblastoma cell viability and migration. Front. Oncol. 2023, 13, 1118268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Abdoli, M.; De Luca, V.; Capasso, C.; Supuran, C.T.; Žalubovskis, R. Benzenesulfonamides Incorporating Hydantoin Moieties Effectively Inhibit Eukaryoticand Human Carbonic Anhydrases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 14115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Abdoli, M.; Giovannuzzi, S.; Supuran, C.T.; Žalubovskis, R. 4-(3-Alkyl/benzyl-guanidino)benzenesulfonamides as selective carbonic anhydrase VII inhibitors. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2022, 37, 1568–1576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Abdoli, M.; Bonardi, A.; Supuran, C.T.; Žalubovskis, R. 4-Cyanamidobenzenesulfonamide derivatives: A novel class of human and bacterial carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2023, 38, 156–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Abdoli, M.; De Luca, V.; Capasso, C.; Supuran, C.T.; Žalubovskis, R. Novel thiazolone-benzenesulphonamide inhibitors of human and bacterial carbonic anhydrases. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2023, 38, 2163243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Abdoli, M.; Krasniqi, V.; Bonardi, A.; Gütschow, M.; Supuran, C.T.; Žalubovskis, R. 4-Cyanamido-substituted benzenesulfonamides act as dual carbonic anhydrase and cathepsin inhibitors. Bioorg. Chem. 2023, 139, 106725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sobati, M.; Abdoli, M.; Bonardi, A.; Gratteri, P.; Supuran, C.T.; Žalubovskis, R. Inhibition Profiles of Some Novel Sulfonamide-Incorporated α-Aminophosphonates on Human Carbonic Anhydrases. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2023, 14, 1067–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Abdoli, M.; Luca, V.D.; Capasso, C.; Supuran, C.T.; Žalubovskis, R. Investigation of carbonic anhydrase inhibitory potency of (Z/E)-alkyl N ′-benzyl-N-(arylsulfonyl)-carbamimidothioates. Future Med. Chem. 2023, 15, 615–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sobati, M.; Abdoli, M.; Angeli, A.; Bonardi, A.; Ferraroni, M.; Supuran, C.T.; Žalubovskis, R. Sulfonamide-incorporated bis(α-aminophosphonates) as promising carbonic anhydrase inhibitors: Design, synthesis, biological evaluation, and X-ray crystallographic studies. Arch. Pharm. 2024, 357, e2400038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Abdoli, M.; Bonardi, A.; Supuran, C.T.; Žalubovskis, R. Synthesis and Carbonic Anhydrase I, II, IX, and XII Inhibition Studies with a Series of Cyclic Sulfonyl Guanidines. ChemMedChem 2024, 19, e202400197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Abdoli, M.; Bonardi, A.; Gratteri, P.; Supuran, C.T.; Žalubovskis, R. Synthesis, carbonic anhydrase inhibition studies and modelling investigations of phthalimide-hydantoin hybrids. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2024, 39, 2335927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Khalifah, R.G. The carbon dioxide hydration activity of carbonic anhydrase. I. Stop-flow kinetic studies on the native human isoenzymes B and C. J. Biol. Chem. 1971, 246, 2561–2573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Srivastava, D.K.; Jude, K.M.; Banerjee, A.L.; Haldar, M.; Manokaran, S.; Kooren, J.; Mallik, S.; Christianson, D.W. Structural analysis of charge discrimination in the binding of inhibitors to human carbonic anhydrases I and II. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 5528–5537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Behnke, C.A.; Le Trong, I.; Godden, J.W.; Merritt, E.A.; Teller, D.C.; Bajorath, J.; Stenkamp, R.E. Atomic resolution studies of carbonic anhydrase II. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2010, 66, 616–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Leitans, J.; Kazaks, A.; Balode, A.; Ivanova, J.; Zalubovskis, R.; Supuran, C.T.; Tars, K. Efficient Expression and Crystallization System of Cancer-Associated Carbonic Anhydrase Isoform IX. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 58, 9004–9009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Whittington, D.A.; Waheed, A.; Ulmasov, B.; Shah, G.N.; Grubb, J.H.; Sly, W.S.; Christianson, D.W. Crystal structure of the dimeric extracellular domain of human carbonic anhydrase XII, a bitopic membrane protein overexpressed in certain cancer tumor cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 9545–9550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Abdoli, M.; Angeli, A.; Bozdag, M.; Carta, F.; Kakanejadifard, A.; Saeidian, H.; Supuran, C.T. Synthesis and carbonic anhydrase I, II, VII, and IX inhibition studies with a series of benzo[d]thiazole-5- and 6-sulfonamides. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2017, 32, 1071–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Abdoli, M.; Bozdag, M.; Angeli, A.; Supuran, C.T. Benzamide-4-Sulfonamides Are Effective Human Carbonic Anhydrase I, II, VII, and IX Inhibitors. Metabolites 2018, 8, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Berman, H.M.; Westbrook, J.; Feng, Z.; Gilliland, G.; Bhat, T.N.; Weissig, H.; Shindyalov, I.N.; Bourne, P.E. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Schrödinger Suite Release, version 2024-3; (a) Maestro v.14.1; (b) Epik, v.6.9; (c) Macromodel v.14.5; (d) Glide, v.10.4; (e) Desmond, v.7.9; (f) Prime, v.5.5; (g) Impact, v.10.4; (h) Jaguar, v.12.5; Schrödinger, LLC: New York, NY, USA, 2024.
  40. Lu, C.; Wu, C.; Ghoreishi, D.; Chen, W.; Wang, L.; Damm, W.; Ross, G.A.; Dahlgren, M.K.; Russell, E.; Von Bargen, C.D.; et al. OPLS4: Improving Force Field Accuracy on Challenging Regimes of Chemical Space. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2021, 17, 4291–4300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kaminski, G.A.; Friesner, R.A.; Tirado-Rives, J.; Jorgensen, W.L. Evaluation and Reparametrization of the OPLS-AA Force Field for Proteins via Comparison with Accurate Quantum Chemical Calculations on Peptides. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 6474–6487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Angeli, A.; Paoletti, N.; Supuran, C.T. Five-Membered Heterocyclic Sulfonamides as Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors. Molecules 2023, 28, 3220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Pettersen, E.F.; Goddard, T.D.; Huang, C.C.; Couch, G.S.; Greenblatt, D.M.; Meng, E.C.; Ferrin, T.E. UCSF Chimera—A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25, 1605–1612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pharmaceuticals 19 00151 g001
Figure 1. Examples of FDA-approved sulfonamide-based CAIs.
Figure 1. Examples of FDA-approved sulfonamide-based CAIs.
Pharmaceuticals 19 00151 g001
Pharmaceuticals 19 00151 g002
Figure 2. Examples of isoform selective sulfonamide-based CAIs having (thio)urea moieties.
Figure 2. Examples of isoform selective sulfonamide-based CAIs having (thio)urea moieties.
Pharmaceuticals 19 00151 g002
Pharmaceuticals 19 00151 g003
Figure 3. General structure of N-aryl-2-(4-sulfamoylphenyl)hydrazine-1-carbothioamides discussed in the paper.
Figure 3. General structure of N-aryl-2-(4-sulfamoylphenyl)hydrazine-1-carbothioamides discussed in the paper.
Pharmaceuticals 19 00151 g003
Pharmaceuticals 19 00151 sch001
Scheme 1. General synthetic scheme of (a) N-aryl-2-(4-sulfamoylphenyl)hydrazine-1-carbothioamides 3; (b) N-aryl-2-(4-sulfamoylphenyl)hydrazine-1-carboxamides 5.
Scheme 1. General synthetic scheme of (a) N-aryl-2-(4-sulfamoylphenyl)hydrazine-1-carbothioamides 3; (b) N-aryl-2-(4-sulfamoylphenyl)hydrazine-1-carboxamides 5.
Pharmaceuticals 19 00151 sch001
Pharmaceuticals 19 00151 g004
Figure 4. (A) 200 ns-long MD trajectory of the ligand 3l–CA IX complex. (B,C) Representative binding modes of ligand 3l for each cluster conformation. H-bonds are shown as black dashed lines. The ligand is depicted with progressively darker coloring along the course of the simulation. Water molecules and Zn2+ are represented as red and gray spheres, respectively. (D) Pie chart showing the representative conformers per cluster and their relative abundances. (E) Histogram of the contacts in the 3l–CA IX complex. A value of 1.00 corresponds to 100% persistence, while values greater than 1.00 indicate that the same residue engages in more than one interaction with the ligand (e.g., T199 forms two H-bonds with the sulfonamide group of 3l).
Figure 4. (A) 200 ns-long MD trajectory of the ligand 3l–CA IX complex. (B,C) Representative binding modes of ligand 3l for each cluster conformation. H-bonds are shown as black dashed lines. The ligand is depicted with progressively darker coloring along the course of the simulation. Water molecules and Zn2+ are represented as red and gray spheres, respectively. (D) Pie chart showing the representative conformers per cluster and their relative abundances. (E) Histogram of the contacts in the 3l–CA IX complex. A value of 1.00 corresponds to 100% persistence, while values greater than 1.00 indicate that the same residue engages in more than one interaction with the ligand (e.g., T199 forms two H-bonds with the sulfonamide group of 3l).
Pharmaceuticals 19 00151 g004
Pharmaceuticals 19 00151 g005
Figure 5. (A) 200 ns-long MD trajectory of the ligand 3l–CA XII complex. (B–D) Representative binding modes of ligand 3l for each cluster conformation. H-bonds, π–π stacking, and π–cation interactions are shown as black, cyan, and green dashed lines, respectively. The ligand is depicted with progressively darker coloring along the course of the simulation. Water molecules and Zn2+ are represented as red and gray spheres, respectively. (E) Pie chart showing the representative conformers per cluster and their relative abundances. (F) Histogram of the contacts in the 3l–CA XII complex. A value of 1.00 corresponds to 100% persistence, while values greater than 1.00 indicate that the same residue engages in more than one interaction with the ligand (e.g., T199 forms two H-bonds with the sulfonamide group of 3l).
Figure 5. (A) 200 ns-long MD trajectory of the ligand 3l–CA XII complex. (B–D) Representative binding modes of ligand 3l for each cluster conformation. H-bonds, π–π stacking, and π–cation interactions are shown as black, cyan, and green dashed lines, respectively. The ligand is depicted with progressively darker coloring along the course of the simulation. Water molecules and Zn2+ are represented as red and gray spheres, respectively. (E) Pie chart showing the representative conformers per cluster and their relative abundances. (F) Histogram of the contacts in the 3l–CA XII complex. A value of 1.00 corresponds to 100% persistence, while values greater than 1.00 indicate that the same residue engages in more than one interaction with the ligand (e.g., T199 forms two H-bonds with the sulfonamide group of 3l).
Pharmaceuticals 19 00151 g005
Table 1. CA inhibition data with N-aryl-2-(4-sulfamoylphenyl)hydrazine-1-carbothioamides (3a–3l) and acetazolamide (AAZ) as a standard drug, by the stopped-flow CO2 hydrase assay.
Table 1. CA inhibition data with N-aryl-2-(4-sulfamoylphenyl)hydrazine-1-carbothioamides (3a–3l) and acetazolamide (AAZ) as a standard drug, by the stopped-flow CO2 hydrase assay.
Pharmaceuticals 19 00151 i001
CompoundRKi (nM) [a]Selectivity Index [b]
hCA IhCA IIhCA IXhCA XIIhCA XII/hCAIX
3aH533.956.6133.36.819.6
3b4-Me95.66.1251.019.712.7
3c4-iPr74.56.6198.39.022.0
3d4-Br187.77.681.96.612.4
3e4-Cl92.97.727.523.11.2
3f4-NO227.67.1122.05.522.2
3g3-Me77.766.573.29.37.9
3h3-Br176.64.831.217.61.8
3i3-Cl7.74.323.97.93.0
3j3-CN87.65.7122.57.217.0
3k2-Br354.943.768.76.310.9
3l2,4-(Cl)2699.478.832.19.53.4
AAZ-250.012.125.75.74.5
[a] Mean from 3 different assays, by a stopped flow technique (errors were in the range of ±5–10% of the reported values). [b] Calculated as the ratio Ki (CA XII)/Ki (CA IX).
Table 2. CA inhibition data with N-aryl-2-(4-sulfamoylphenyl)hydrazine-1-carboxamides (5a,b) and acetazolamide (AAZ) as a standard drug, by the stopped-flow CO2 hydrase assay.
Table 2. CA inhibition data with N-aryl-2-(4-sulfamoylphenyl)hydrazine-1-carboxamides (5a,b) and acetazolamide (AAZ) as a standard drug, by the stopped-flow CO2 hydrase assay.
Pharmaceuticals 19 00151 i002
CompoundRKi (nM) [a]Selectivity Index [b]
hCA IhCA IIhCA IXhCA XIIhCA XII/hCA IX
5aH749.992.8255.08.231.1
5b4-Me86.39.1278.86.642.2
AAZ-250.012.125.75.74.5
[a] Mean from 3 different assays, by a stopped flow technique (errors were in the range of ±5–10% of the reported values). [b] Calculated as the ratio Ki (CA XII)/Ki (CA IX).
Table 3. In vitro cytotoxicity (IC50, µM) of N-aryl-2-(4-sulfamoylphenyl)hydrazine-1-carbothioamides 3a and 3l after 48 h of incubation.
Table 3. In vitro cytotoxicity (IC50, µM) of N-aryl-2-(4-sulfamoylphenyl)hydrazine-1-carbothioamides 3a and 3l after 48 h of incubation.
CompoundCell Line
MDA-MB-231MDA-MB-435PANC-1U-118A2780A549
3a50.8 ± 1.580.1 ± 7.087.1 ± 3.385.3 ± 6.053.9 ± 4.681.0 ± 7.0
3l31.4 ± 3.089.6 ± 11.483.0 ± 11.247.2 ± 3.141.1 ± 7.538.4 ± 2.3
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abdoli, M.; Angeli, A.; Bonardi, A.; Gratteri, P.; Jackevica, L.; Sizovs, A.; Supuran, C.T.; Žalubovskis, R. Investigation on N-Aryl-2-(4-sulfamoylphenyl)hydrazine-1-carbothioamide as Human Carbonic Anhydrases Inhibitors. Pharmaceuticals 2026, 19, 151. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph19010151

AMA Style

Abdoli M, Angeli A, Bonardi A, Gratteri P, Jackevica L, Sizovs A, Supuran CT, Žalubovskis R. Investigation on N-Aryl-2-(4-sulfamoylphenyl)hydrazine-1-carbothioamide as Human Carbonic Anhydrases Inhibitors. Pharmaceuticals. 2026; 19(1):151. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph19010151

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abdoli, Morteza, Andrea Angeli, Alessandro Bonardi, Paola Gratteri, Ludmila Jackevica, Antons Sizovs, Claudiu T. Supuran, and Raivis Žalubovskis. 2026. "Investigation on N-Aryl-2-(4-sulfamoylphenyl)hydrazine-1-carbothioamide as Human Carbonic Anhydrases Inhibitors" Pharmaceuticals 19, no. 1: 151. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph19010151

APA Style

Abdoli, M., Angeli, A., Bonardi, A., Gratteri, P., Jackevica, L., Sizovs, A., Supuran, C. T., & Žalubovskis, R. (2026). Investigation on N-Aryl-2-(4-sulfamoylphenyl)hydrazine-1-carbothioamide as Human Carbonic Anhydrases Inhibitors. Pharmaceuticals, 19(1), 151. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph19010151

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop