1. Introduction
Rolling element bearings are commonly used in rotating machines to support and facilitate shaft rotation and power transmission. A bearing is a mechanical system that consists of the outer ring, inner ring, rolling elements (balls or rollers), and a cage. As the bearing components are subjected to dynamic loadings in operation, they could be damaged for reasons such as fatigue and severe wear [
1,
2]. According to a previous investigation [
3], more than 50% of rotatory machine imperfections are related to bearing faults. Therefore, new techniques of reliable bearing fault detection and diagnosis are critically needed in industries to recognize bearing defects as early as possible to prevent machine operation degradation, improve safety, and reduce costs of maintenance by preventing unnecessary machine downtime.
Fault detection is the process of applying some signal processing technique(s) to extract representative features from the measured signals to predict the health conditions of the machine, we use rolling element bearings in this work. Signals are measured by using appropriate sensors to transform physical quantities to electrical data. Bearing fault detection can be performed by analyzing signals in forms such as temperature, pressure, acoustics, lubricant, and vibration. Vibration signals usually have a higher signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) than other types of signals in machine fault detection [
4], which will also be used in this work.
Bearing component materials are subjected to dynamic loading in operation. Bearing defects can occur when material fatigue limits are exceeded. Whenever the faulty location on a bearing element interacts with other bearing elements, abrupt changes in the contact stresses generate impact impulses, which will cause resonance vibrations of the bearing housing and its support structure. Based on the defect location, the respective characteristic frequencies for the bearing with an outer race defect (
), inner race fault (
), and rolling element damage (
) are represented as [
2]:
where
Z is the number of rolling elements,
is shaft rotating speed (Hz),
D is the pitch diameter,
is the contact angle, and
d is the diameter of the rolling element.
Many techniques have been proposed in the literature for bearing fault detection. They can be classified into the time domain, frequency domain, and time–frequency domain analysis. In time domain analysis, bearing faults are detected by analyzing the vibration signal using some statistical indicators, such as skewness, root mean square, and kurtosis [
5]. However, these methods have low accuracy in analyzing non-stationary signals, which usually correspond to faulty bearing features.
Signal processing can be performed in the frequency domain using techniques such as the Fourier Transform (FT) and cepstrum analysis. The spectrum of a vibration signal can be used to examine the theoretical characteristic frequencies for bearing fault detection [
6]. However, the fault characteristic frequencies for many bearing fault conditions (e.g., inner race and rolling element faults) are non-stationary due to variations in load and rotational speed, slip in bearings, and nonlinear effects in the transmission system. Envelope analysis is another method in frequency domain analysis for bearing fault detection [
7], which could overcome some of the shortcomings of the classical FT and the related methods. In envelope analysis, the signals are bandpass filtered, and only the signals around the resonance frequencies are applied to detect the bearing fault characteristic frequencies [
8]. However, it is usually difficult to select proper frequency bands for envelope analysis.
Time–frequency domain analysis studies signal properties in both the time domain and the frequency domain simultaneously. There are several time–frequency signal processing methods in the literature, such as the wavelet transform (WT) [
9] and the short-time FT [
10]. WT analysis has low time resolution under high-frequency conditions and low-frequency resolution under high-time conditions, which ultimately undermines the accuracy of fault detection [
11]. Moreover, if the signal changes due to an unexpected impact or noise, the original mother wavelet may not properly represent the signal properties in fault detection. To address these problems, empirical mode decomposition (EMD) has been applied for bearing fault detection. EMD is an adaptive data-processing method that provides multi-resolution over different frequency scales [
12]. Using the instantaneous amplitude and instantaneous frequency, EMD can decompose the original signal into a set of intrinsic mode functions (IMFs). Several techniques have been proposed to select proper IMFs for bearing fault detection, for example, based on the energy associated with the IMF [
13,
14]. The fault representative IMF can also be selected based on correlation coefficients with the signal. However, EMD cannot decompose a signal strictly orthogonally. As a result, selecting one or two IMFs may lead to less reliable fault detection and sometimes make it difficult to apply EMD to long, non-stationary signals [
15]. Hence, new IMF processing techniques are needed to address these limitations so as to provide more efficient and reliable bearing fault diagnosis.
In general, the Hilbert–Huang transform (HHT) performs better than the WT and short-time FT in bearing fault detection [
13,
16]. However, the HHT also has some limitations in edge distortion and mode mixing, which can degrade its processing accuracy [
17]. The Teager–Kaiser (TK) energy operator needs only a few samples for energy calculation at each instant time instant for nonlinear and non-stationary signal processing. Several combined techniques have been suggested for bearing fault detection, for example, using a TK-energy transformation [
1], TK-envelope technique [
18], TK-energy operator [
19], and TK-singular spectrum analysis [
20]. Although TK analysis could provide better performance than the HHT in machine fault detection, the TK spectrums are very sensitive to high-frequency noise caused by speed variations, impacts, and sudden load changes.
To tackle the aforementioned limitations in existing techniques, the objective of this work is to propose an enhanced TK technique, eTK in short, for more accurate nonstationary signal analysis and bearing fault detection using vibration signals. The proposed eTK technique is new in the following aspects: (1) A new EMD analysis method is suggested to recognize the representative IMFs with different frequency components. (2) An eTK denoising filter is proposed to improve the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the selected IMF features. The formulated analytical signal spectrum analysis is conducted to identify representative features for bearing fault detection. The effectiveness of the proposed eTK technique is verified through experimental tests conducted under different bearing conditions.
The remainder of the paper is organized as follows: The proposed eTK technique is discussed in
Section 2. The effectiveness of the eTK technique is examined in
Section 3 by systematic experimental tests.
3. Performance Verification
The effectiveness of the proposed eTK technique will be examined in this section by experimental tests using vibration signals. Its robustness will be tested using datasets from a different experimental setup.
3.1. Experimental Setup
Figure 10 shows the experimental setup used in this test. It is driven by a 3 HP electric motor operating at speeds ranging from 100 to 4200 rpm, regulated by a frequency converter (VFD022B21A, WiAutomation, CA, USA). Elastic couplings are utilized to eliminate high-frequency impacts and vibrations from the motor and the gearbox. An optical sensor provides a one-pulse-per-revolution signal to measure shaft speed. The bearing under test (MBER-10K, MAT, ON, Canada) is located on the left bearing housing, with the following bearing parameters: eight balls, ball diameter of 7.938 mm, a pitch diameter of 33.503 mm, and a contact angle of 0°. Static loads are applied using two heavy mass disks and a dynamic load is introduced through a brake system connected via a gearbox. Vibration signals are acquired using smart vibration sensors developed by the authors’ research team. General accelerometers (ICP-603C01) mounted on the top of another bearing housing are used for verification. The collected signals are processed and analyzed using MATLAB R2024a (MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA).
In this test, four bearing health conditions are considered: healthy bearings, bearings with outer race defects, bearings with inner race defects, and bearings with rolling element defects.
Table 1 summarizes the characteristic frequencies in terms of shaft speed
for bearings with different health conditions using Equations (1)–(3).
3.2. Test Result Analysis
The performance of the proposed eTK technique includes denoising and IMF synthesis. It is represented as eTK, which is compared with two other related techniques.
(1) To compare the effectiveness of the proposed eTK, another related technique named HHT is used for comparison, specified as HHT.
(2) To verify the necessity of the denoising process, a comparison is provided with the proposed eTK but without using the denoising filter, denoted as TK.
All the techniques are implemented in MATLAB R2023b. Many tests have been undertaken under different speed and load conditions. A set of typical processing results with shaft speed of fR = 30 Hz (or 1800 RPM), load level of 2.3 Nm, and sampling frequency of 20 kHz, are used for illustration.
To quantify the fault detection effectiveness using the related techniques, a diagnostic clarity index is adopted for evaluation:
where
S(
f) is the spectral amplitude at frequency
f, which is normalized by the maximum spectral amplitude
over the bandwidth;
fc denotes a bearing characteristic frequency and its first three harmonics.
3.2.1. Healthy Bearing Analysis
Firstly, the tests are undertaken on a healthy bearing. The bearing characteristic frequency in this case is
fH = 30 Hz.
Figure 11 shows the processing results using related techniques. The selected IMFs are the first and second IMFs (i.e., IMF
1 and IMF
2). As shown in
Figure 11a, the classical HHT can recognize the characteristic frequency (
fH = 30 Hz) and its harmonics; however, it does not dominate the resulting spectrum, which may result in false diagnosis; its diagnostic clarify index is
DI = 87.5%. Examining the TK in
Figure 11b, it is seen that TK, or eTK without denoising, can only recognize the third harmonic of the characteristic frequency with a very low magnitude (
DI = 90.8%). On the other hand, the eTK with the denoising filter performs better than the TK method, which not only has a much higher magnitude (0.08 vs. 0.008), but also can recognize the fundamental characteristic frequency (
fH = 30 Hz) clearly, as shown in
Figure 11c with
DI = 96.5%.
3.2.2. Outer Race Fault Detection
The outer race is the fixed ring in most bearing applications. When a bearing is damaged, the amplitude modulation of fault characteristic frequency is usually masked by strong noise. The selected IMFs in this case are the first, second, and fourth IMFs (i.e., IMF
1, IMF
2, and IMF
4).
Figure 12 shows the processing results using related techniques. In this case, the characteristic fault frequency is
fOD = 87.82 Hz. As shown in
Figure 12b, although the KT can recognize the fault characteristic frequency, it is very close to the third harmonic of the shaft speed, but with a lower magnitude. Correspondingly, the diagnostic information is not clear, with a
DI = 79.6%. Examining
Figure 12a, the HHT method can clearly predict the bearing outer race fault with
DI = 95.3%. However, in comparison with the processing results of the proposed eTK technique in
Figure 12c, it is seen that the eTK method performs better, which exhibits higher spectral magnitude at the fault frequency and its second harmonic (
DI = 99.4%) because of its unique feature selection and denoising effects.
3.2.3. Inner Race Fault Detection
The second and third IMFs (i.e., IMF
2 and IMF
3) are selected for inner race fault detection. The fault characteristic frequency in this case is
fID = 142.9 Hz. As shown in
Figure 13a, although the HHT can recognize the fault characteristic frequency and its harmonic in this case (
DI = 72.3%), the shaft rotating frequencies dominate the spectrum, which degrades fault detection reliability. The inner race rotates with the shaft, which makes it difficult to detect the fault spectral features, especially considering the slip and load zone dynamic variations. Both the TK method in
Figure 13b and the eTK technique in
Figure 13b clearly predict the occurrence of the bearing inner race defect, in this case with dominant fault characteristic frequency, the eTK in
Figure 13b performs even better than the TK, because the eTK denoising filter can effectively improve the SNR and highlight the fault features against noise. In this case, the diagnostic clarity index of TK is
DI = 97.3% and the eTK technique is
DI = 99.5%.
3.2.4. Rolling Element Fault Detection
Detecting faults in a rolling element (a ball) is usually the most challenging task in bearing fault detection. In this case, the fault characteristic frequency is
fBD = 113.2 Hz. The selected IMFs are the first, second, and third IMFs (i.e., IMF
1, IMF
2, and IMF
3). As shown in
Figure 14a,b, both the HHT and TK have failed to recognize the fault features to predict the bearing fault in this case, with
DI = 12.4% and 7.6% for the HHT and TK, respectively. The proposed eTK, however, is the only technique that can provide some indication of the rolling element damage, as shown in
Figure 14c, even though the feature does not dominate the spectrum (
DI = 77.8%). It is because a ball rotates as well as slides, which makes the fault resonance modes change over time. The vibration patterns change when the damaged ball moves from the load zone to the unload zone. Complex impacts and vibrations are generated due to these effects.
3.3. Robustness Testing
To evaluate the robustness of the proposed eTK technique, different vibration datasets from Case Western Reserve University (CWRU) [
23] are used for this investigation. Experiments are conducted using the experimental setup, as shown in
Figure 15. The system is driven by a 2 hp motor. The vibration signals are measured using accelerometers attached to the housing using magnetic bases. Accelerometers are placed at both the drive-end and fan-end of the motor housing. Data from the drive-end is used for analysis in this work. Vibration signals are collected using a sampling frequency of 12,000 Hz. More details about the bearing test conditions can be found in [
23].
The tested bearings are 6205-2RS JEM, SKF, CA, USA (deep groove ball bearing from SKF), with the following parameters: rolling elements, Z: 8; rolling element diameter, d: 7.94 mm; pitch diameter, D: 39.04 mm; and contact angle, : 0 degree.
The tested bearings have different health conditions (e.g., healthy, outer, inner, and rolling element faults). By Equations (1)–(3), the corresponding characteristic frequencies in terms of shaft rotation speed
are summarized in
Table 2.
3.3.1. Healthy Bearing Condition Monitoring (Simulation Test)
Firstly, processing results of a healthy bearing using the same techniques are shown in
Figure 16. In this case, the characteristic frequency of the bearing is
fH = 29.53 Hz. It is seen that the TK in
Figure 16b and eTK in
Figure 16c perform better than the HHT (
DI = 87.6%) in
Figure 16a. On the other hand, the eTK (
DI = 98.7%) outperforms TK (
DI = 90.5%), because the eTK has a higher SNR using its efficient denoising filter.
3.3.2. Outer Race Fault Detection
Figure 17 shows the processing results for a bearing with an outer race defect. In this case, the fault characteristic frequency is
fOD = 106 Hz. Although all three techniques can predict the outer race bearing fault, the proposed eTK technique in
Figure 17c performs the best with
DI = 99.1%, due to its efficient denoising filtering improve the SNR. The HHT method in
Figure 17a has a higher noise level (
DI = 92.2%) than the eTK. Even though the TK in
Figure 17b can predict the bearing fault, the dominant frequency is the second harmonic of the characteristic frequency (
DI = 90.5%).
3.3.3. Inner Race Fault Detection
The processing results of a bearing with an inner race fault are shown in
Figure 18. The fault characteristic frequency in this case is
fID = 160 Hz. It is seen that the proposed eTK technique (
DI = 98.7%) in
Figure 18c outperforms the HHT (
DI = 91.4%) in
Figure 18a and the TK method (
DI = 88.5%) in
Figure 18b, in terms of SNR and clarity in diagnosing fault characteristic frequency.
3.3.4. Rolling Element Fault Detection
Figure 19 shows the processing results using the related techniques for a bearing with a rolling element defect. The characteristic frequency in this case is
fBD = 139 Hz. Both the HHT (
DI = 27.8%) in
Figure 19a and the TK method (
DI = 18.6%) in
Figure 19b failed to predict the fall fault bearing condition. Although the proposed eTK technique in
Figure 19c with denoising filtering can recognize the fault spectral features in this case (
DI = 47.2%), the characteristic frequency component is not a prominent frequency on the spectral map.