This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessArticle
A Comparative Assessment of Sentinel-2 and UAV-Based Imagery for Soil Organic Carbon Estimations Using Machine Learning Models
by
Imad El-Jamaoui
Imad El-Jamaoui *,
Maria José Martínez Sánchez
Maria José Martínez Sánchez ,
Carmen Pérez Sirvent
Carmen Pérez Sirvent
and
Salvadora Martínez López
Salvadora Martínez López *
Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Geology and Pedology, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2025, 25(17), 5281; https://doi.org/10.3390/s25175281 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 25 June 2025
/
Revised: 4 August 2025
/
Accepted: 22 August 2025
/
Published: 25 August 2025
Abstract
As the largest carbon reservoir in terrestrial ecosystems, soil organic carbon (SOC) plays a critical role in the global carbon cycle and climate change mitigation. A promising approach to swiftly procuring geographically dispersed SOC data is the amalgamation of UAV-based multispectral imagery at the local scale and Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at the regional scale. This integrated approach is particularly well-suited for precision agriculture and real-time monitoring. In this study, we evaluated the performance of UAVs and Sentinel-2 imagery in predicting SOC using four machine-learning models: Multiple Linear Regression (MLR), Support Vector Regression (SVR), Random Forest (RF), and Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs). UAV imagery outperformed Sentinel-2, achieving more accurate detection of local SOC variability thanks to its finer spatial resolution (5–10 cm versus 10–20 m). Among the models tested, the Random Forest algorithm achieved the highest accuracy, with an R2 of up to 0.85 using UAV data and 0.65 using Sentinel-2 data, along with low RMSE values. All models confirmed the superiority of UAV imagery based on key error metrics (SSE, MSE, RMSE, and NSE). Although Sentinel-2 remains valuable for regional assessments, UAV imagery combined with Random Forest provides the most reliable SOC estimates at local scales. The spatial SOC maps generated from both UAV and Sentinel-2 imagery showed more nuanced spatial variability than standard interpolation techniques. While prediction accuracy using UAV-based models was slightly lower in some cases, UAV imagery provided greater spatial detail in SOC distribution. However, this is associated with higher acquisition and processing costs compared to freely available Sentinel-2 imagery. Given their respective advantages, we recommend using UAV imagery for detailed, site-specific SOC estimations and Sentinel-2 data for broader regional-to-global SOC mapping efforts.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
El-Jamaoui, I.; Martínez Sánchez, M.J.; Pérez Sirvent, C.; Martínez López, S.
A Comparative Assessment of Sentinel-2 and UAV-Based Imagery for Soil Organic Carbon Estimations Using Machine Learning Models. Sensors 2025, 25, 5281.
https://doi.org/10.3390/s25175281
AMA Style
El-Jamaoui I, Martínez Sánchez MJ, Pérez Sirvent C, Martínez López S.
A Comparative Assessment of Sentinel-2 and UAV-Based Imagery for Soil Organic Carbon Estimations Using Machine Learning Models. Sensors. 2025; 25(17):5281.
https://doi.org/10.3390/s25175281
Chicago/Turabian Style
El-Jamaoui, Imad, Maria José Martínez Sánchez, Carmen Pérez Sirvent, and Salvadora Martínez López.
2025. "A Comparative Assessment of Sentinel-2 and UAV-Based Imagery for Soil Organic Carbon Estimations Using Machine Learning Models" Sensors 25, no. 17: 5281.
https://doi.org/10.3390/s25175281
APA Style
El-Jamaoui, I., Martínez Sánchez, M. J., Pérez Sirvent, C., & Martínez López, S.
(2025). A Comparative Assessment of Sentinel-2 and UAV-Based Imagery for Soil Organic Carbon Estimations Using Machine Learning Models. Sensors, 25(17), 5281.
https://doi.org/10.3390/s25175281
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
For more information on the journal statistics, click
here.
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.