You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Sensors
  • Article
  • Open Access

2 January 2023

Assessing the Role of AI-Based Smart Sensors in Smart Cities Using AHP and MOORA

and
1
Department of Accounting and Information Systems, College of Business and Economics, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar
2
Department of Computer Science, University of Swabi, Swabi 23430, Pakistan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Special Issue Artificial Intelligence and Advances in Smart IoT

Abstract

We know that in today’s advanced world, artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML)-grounded methodologies are playing a very optimistic role in performing difficult and time-consuming activities very conveniently and quickly. However, for the training and testing of these procedures, the main factor is the availability of a huge amount of data, called big data. With the emerging techniques of the Internet of Everything (IoE) and the Internet of Things (IoT), it is very feasible to collect a large volume of data with the help of smart and intelligent sensors. Based on these smart sensing devices, very innovative and intelligent hardware components can be made for prediction and recognition purposes. A detailed discussion was carried out on the development and employment of various detectors for providing people with effective services, especially in the case of smart cities. With these devices, a very healthy and intelligent environment can be created for people to live in safely and happily. With the use of modern technologies in integration with smart sensors, it is possible to use energy resources very productively. Smart vehicles can be developed to sense any emergency, to avoid injuries and fatal accidents. These sensors can be very helpful in management and monitoring activities for the enhancement of productivity. Several significant aspects are obtained from the available literature, and significant articles are selected from the literature to properly examine the uses of sensor technology for the development of smart infrastructure. The analytical hierarchy process (AHP) is used to give these attributes weights. Finally, the weights are used with the multi-objective optimization on the basis of ratio analysis (MOORA) technique to provide the different options in their order of importance.

1. Introduction

It has been demonstrated that the employment of AI- and ML-based algorithms in the creation of automated systems is quite effective. In smart buildings, tracking devices and sensors generate a large amount of data. One of the cutting-edge components that can enhance intelligent urban infrastructure is big-data analytics. Intelligent IoT devices, automated systems, and sensing equipment continuously gather massive amounts of data in smart cities. The application of data analytics and machine learning techniques determines how accurate a forecast is.
An analysis of the existing approaches for detection in smart buildings was presented through investigation. Contents cover monitoring applications in intelligent cities, sensing platforms, and technical issues related to these technologies. A variety of applications and the technical difficulties involved with these applications are covered in an attempt to provide a comprehensive understanding of how sensing technologies function in smart cities. The information provided in this study attempts to connect these gaps, because some of these methodologies fall under the purview of distinct subject areas. This optimistic overview can assist professionals in recognizing how sophisticated detection can contribute to the development of smart cities [1]. Ramírez-Moreno et al. [2] examined the various sensors that are frequently employed in projects to build smart cities. There are insights regarding various applications and communication technologies, as well as the primary potential and difficulties encountered when converting to a smart city. In the end, this study is about more than just smart urban infrastructure; it is also about how these new digitalization and monitoring advancements enhance living conditions. Smarter societies are those that invest in, socialize with, and adapt to these innovations in conformity with local and regional societal requirements and ideals.
Smart cities are playing a very important role in providing people with quick services. For handling the hurdles of the heterogeneity of the sensors, Fazio et al. [3] developed a novel paradigm that is capable of dual abstraction of sophisticated sensing networks and the knowledge they gather. Offering a global solution that is adaptable and scalable is a crucial component of the proposed approach. The architecture framework utilizes the Contiki operating system and is focused on Sensor Web Enablement standard protocols to deploy the Internet of Things. Channi and Kumar [4] drew attention to the necessity of sensing devices in smart cities for remotely controlled systems. The sophisticated temperature sensors were described in depth. With illustrations such as water management systems, sustainable energy, lighting control mechanisms, and sewage treatment, the implementations of super-clever temperature sensors in smart buildings were also covered. Cities with smart buildings can supply vital services more swiftly and effectively due to an array of sensors, camera systems, cabling, wireless connections, and data centers.
Due to various unique and interesting technologies, such as the Internet of Things, smart sensing-based systems can be employed for peoples’ well-being and progress. The efficient usage of such methodologies can provide people with basic needs at their doorstep. The main goals of this suggested approach are:
  • to analyze the impacts of sensor-grounded systems on the lives of human beings;
  • to consider the role of modern technology in the implementation of intelligent IoT-based systems;
  • to extract useful parameters and select significant parameters from the available techniques;
  • to use AHP to calculate the weights of these attributes and to utilize the MOORA process to carry out the ranking of options.
This article is organized as follows: Section 1 provides an overview of the study. A summary of the currently used research methodologies is provided in Section 2. The study’s executed technique is provided in Section 3. The study’s findings are the focus of Section 4. A general summary of the entire research is presented in Section 5.

3. Methodology

The use of smart sensors plays a very crucial role in the prediction and effective decision-making architectures. They are very helpful in the development of intelligent embedded systems for achieving high accuracy in complex and difficult tasks, such as power management, health-related decision making, and educational activities. Their usage is gaining increasing attention with the implementation of information and communication technologies.
With the rise of smart cities, the research seeks to investigate the security issues that are introduced by suspicious network assaults in human resources administration. Initially, the privacy of the data physics platform is successfully assessed using the Stackelberg game theory methodological approach to characterize the relationship between sensing devices and smart jammers. To secure the confidentiality of embedded systems, a denoise autoencoder machine architecture, which may be employed in human resource management using demographic information, is provided. In the end, its performance is examined and modeled [27]. Doran et al. [28] outlined how individuals might act as human sensors to provide additional, alternative, and alternative data resources for smart cities. That article offers a way of extracting from social media posts the opinions that could be pertinent to projects involving smart cities, using a probabilistic learning algorithm. We analyzed geo-tagged tweets from New York City over two months to demonstrate the possibilities of social media-powered individual monitors. The capacity to self-monitor and react to impulses and the transmission of information from a wide range of physical devices powers smart city initiatives. The paper advances a theoretical framework to understand AI, specifically in urban contexts. It develops the concept of urban artificial intelligence, capturing the main manifestations of AI in cities. It examines the case of Masdar City, an Emirati urban experiment, to show how the genesis of urban AI is part of a long-standing process of technological development [29]. The study offers new information about how AI might help cities become smarter. As the methodologic strategy, a thorough evaluation of the literature is chosen. The main components of smart city development—economy, society, environment, and governance—are used to categorize the results [30].

3.1. Extracted Features

The extremely valuable and significant features are assembled from the literature, as shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Extracted Features.

3.2. Selected Features

The following essential traits are revealed by a comprehensive analysis of the literature, as shown in Figure 1. These features were considered as they are the most common features used in the literature and people demonstrate greater preference for them.
Figure 1. Selected Features.

3.3. AHP Methodology

This computational mathematics approach works well for managing and analyzing challenging decisions. AHP offers a practical method for handling various problems in various circumstances, while coming to wise and practical conclusions. Using the scale Saaty created, which is depicted in Table 2, we may make informed decisions among the numerous options that are accessible, in light of several considerations. In 1980, Saaty originally proposed this tactic [31].
Table 2. Saaty scale.
The several underpinning principles of the AHP approach are shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2. AHP.
AHP Tree Diagram. This diagram presents the issue as a hierarchical structure with three levels. The first level displays the objective, while the second level displays the criteria. The third level, as shown in Figure 3, explains the potential outcomes. The figure shows the goal, criteria, and alternatives for the proposed study. There are total of six features and alternaties.
Figure 3. Hierarchical Diagram.
Pair-Wise Comparison Matrix. By providing each attribute with a precise score on the Saaty scale, based on the needs of the person in charge, a matrix is created. The pair-wise comparison matrix for the current condition is shown in Table 3.
Table 3. Pair-Wise Comparison Matrix.
Normalized Matrix. As shown in Table 4, the required normalized matrix may be calculated using Equation (1). The intial score was given to each criterion and alternative, after which the pairwise comparison was carried out. The various infrastructures included infrastructure 1 to infrastructure 6. These show the different situations for which the pairwise comparisons were carried out.
A i j = X i j s u m   o f   e a c h   c o l u m n
Table 4. Normalized Matrix.
Criteria Weights. As shown in Table 5, the average of each row of the normalized pair-wise comparison matrix is used to determine each criterion’s weight (2).
C . W . = X i j   n
Table 5. Criteria Weights.
Consistency Index. C.I. may be calculated through the use of Equation (3).
C . I = λ m a x n n 1 C . I = 7.29572 6 6 1 C . I =   0.25914
Consistency Ratio. Equation (4) was used to calculate an estimate of the value of C.R.
C . R = C . I R . I
These equations show the consistency index and the consistency ratio for the study, for pairwise comparisons.
Resultant Weights. The results of the attributes assessed using the analytical hierarchy process are shown in Figure 4.
Figure 4. Calculated Weights.

3.4. MOORA Method

Each component of the decision matrix is first changed in MOORA to produce the regular lattice, as shown in Table 6. Then, network nodes are constructed for each attribute. The base stations have the highest benefit-type measured values and the lowest cost-type parameter value. The aggregation of factors and biases for the cost type of parameter must be subtracted from the aggregate of weights and biases for the benefit type of criteria to get the evaluation values. Depending on these assessment scores, the choices are ultimately rated. The architectural depiction of the judgment matrix is shown in (5) [32]. This matrix shows the process of pairwise comparisons for each feature, along with its alternative.
A = [ a 11 a 12 a 1 n a 21 a 22 a 2 n a m 1 a m 2 a m n ]
Table 6. Decision Matrix.
Flow of MOORA. The MOORA procedure adhered to the following ideas, as shown in Figure 5.
Figure 5. MOORA.
Normalized Matrix. A normalized choice matrix was produced using Equation (6), as shown in Table 7.
X i j * = x i j i = 1 m x i j 2
Table 7. Normalized Matrix.
Beneficial and Non-beneficial Features. The total of the favorable and unfavorable characteristics is calculated using Equations (7) and (8), as shown in Table 8.
s u m   o f   b e n e f i c i a l   p a r a m e t e r = y i + = j = 1 g w j x i j *
s u m   o f   n o n b e n e f i c i a l   p a r a m e t e r = y i = j = g + 1 n w j x i j *
Table 8. Beneficial and Non-beneficial Features.
Ranking. The choices were determined on the basis of the difference between using Equation (7) or the MOORA technique (8). The candidate with the greatest difference value was ranked first, then the next contender, as shown in Table 9.
Table 9. Ranking of the Alternatives.

4. Results and Discussion

The world is changing very rapidly with the development of modern information and communication technologies. The implementation of automation is the focus of every sector of our lives. To achieve efficiency and feasibility in daily activities, the Internet of Things, along with other technologies, is revolutionizing every task. Smart and intelligent sensors are used for the collection of data related to various parameters such as health, environment, and energy. This article provides an analysis of the contributions made by clever sensing technologies in integration with artificial intelligence and machine learning for effective monitoring and management procedures. The significant use of sensors in smart cities may help provide inhabitants with quality healthcare options. The Internet of Things is discussed from the standpoint of certain applications and services, such as automation and intelligent surveillance. Smart and automated sensors that are based on the Internet of Things are making the concept of intelligent cities a reality. The available literature has many important qualities, the most important of which have been selected to rank the alternatives. The weights of these qualities have been determined using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP), and the rankings were determined using the multi-objective optimization on the basis of research analysis (MOORA) method. Figure 6 shows that, in terms of statistics, Infrastructure 6 was rated at the top and Infrastructure 3 at the bottom.
Figure 6. Ranking.
Figure 7 displays the overall relationship among the chosen alternatives as determined by the research design.
Figure 7. Relationship among alternatives.

5. Conclusions

By examining a variety of purposes and defining additional features and concepts for sensors and detecting platforms used in green infrastructure, power networks, and electric grids, this article’s ultimate objective was to provide readers with a better understanding of the existing techniques in this field. The sensors-grounded paradigms are very beneficial for use in vehicles for avoiding any unwanted situation and can also be used for navigation purposes. They have numerous applications in the health sector, including smart monitoring, treatment, and pandemic prevention and control. For the positive consumption of energy resources and other assets, sensors can be employed with smart checking and analytics. A problem that commonly occurs in our cities is the inability to find open parking places. People who commute to work are looking for a space to park, clogging the roads. The most common urban problems, such as parking availability and traffic congestion, are being solved through IoT. Allocating scores to the chosen qualities is accomplished using the multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) approach known as AHP, while the ranking is accomplished using the MOORA methodology. The current study took into account a thorough listing of the publications that are available in the field of investigation. The investigation found different approaches in the literature survey, which suggests that academics might determine fresh approaches in the sector.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.U.K. and S.N.; Methodology, H.U.K. and S.N.; Software, H.U.K. and S.N.; Validation, H.U.K. and S.N.; Formal analysis, H.U.K. and S.N.; Investigation, H.U.K. and S.N.; Resources, H.U.K. and S.N.; Data curation, H.U.K. and S.N.; Writing—original draft, H.U.K. and S.N.; Writing—review & editing, S.N.; Visualization, S.N.; Supervision, S.N.; Project administration, S.N.; Funding acquisition, S.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The Qatar University Internal Grant No. QUHI-CBE-21/22-1 funded this publication.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hancke, G.P.; de Carvalho e Silva, B.; Hancke, G.P., Jr. The role of advanced sensing in smart cities. Sensors 2012, 13, 393–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ramírez-Moreno, M.A.; Keshtkar, S.; Padilla-Reyes, D.A.; Ramos-López, E.; García-Martínez, M.; Hernández-Luna, M.C.; Mogro, A.E.; Mahlknecht, J.; Huertas, J.I.; Peimbert-García, R.E. Sensors for sustainable smart cities: A review. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 8198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Fazio, M.; Paone, M.; Puliafito, A.; Villari, M. Heterogeneous sensors become homogeneous things in smart cities. In Proceedings of the 2012 Sixth International Conference on Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing, Palermo, Italy, 4–6 July 2012; pp. 775–780. [Google Scholar]
  4. Channi, H.K.; Kumar, R. The role of smart sensors in smart city. In Smart Sensor Networks; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022; pp. 27–48. [Google Scholar]
  5. Shetty, C.; Dhananjaya, B.; Rashmi, N. Intelligent Sensors based Waste Disposal system for Smart Cities. In Proceedings of the 2020 4th International Conference on Electronics, Communication and Aerospace Technology (ICECA), Coimbatore, India, 5–7 November 2020; pp. 63–68. [Google Scholar]
  6. Quasim, M.T.; Khan, M.A.; Algarni, F.; Alshahrani, M.M. Fundamentals of Smart Cities. In Smart Cities: A Data Analytics Perspective; Khan, M.A., Algarni, F., Quasim, M.T., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switerland, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sumi, L.; Ranga, V. Sensor enabled Internet of Things for smart cities. In Proceedings of the 2016 Fourth International Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Grid Computing (PDGC), Waknaghat, India, 22–24 December 2016; pp. 295–300. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ji, Y. Application of fault detection using distributed sensors in smart cities. Phys. Commun. 2021, 46, 101182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bogatinoska, D.C.; Malekian, R.; Trengoska, J.; Nyako, W.A. Advanced sensing and internet of things in smart cities. In Proceedings of the 2016 39th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO), Opatija, Croatia, 30 May–3 June 2016; pp. 632–637. [Google Scholar]
  10. Vakula, D.; Kolli, Y.K. Low cost smart parking system for smart cities. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Intelligent Sustainable Systems (ICISS), Palladam, India, 7–8 December 2017; pp. 280–284. [Google Scholar]
  11. Rathee, G.; Iqbal, R.; Waqar, O.; Bashir, A.K. On the design and implementation of a blockchain enabled e-voting application within iot-oriented smart cities. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 34165–34176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Shamsir, S.; Mahbub, I.; Islam, S.K.; Rahman, A. Applications of sensing technology for smart cities. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 60th International Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems (MWSCAS), Boston, MA, USA, 6–9 August 2017; pp. 1150–1153. [Google Scholar]
  13. Menon, V.G.; Jacob, S.; Joseph, S.; Sehdev, P.; Khosravi, M.R.; Al-Turjman, F. An IoT-enabled intelligent automobile system for smart cities. Internet Things 2022, 18, 100213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Morello, R.; Mukhopadhyay, S.C.; Liu, Z.; Slomovitz, D.; Samantaray, S.R. Advances on sensing technologies for smart cities and power grids: A review. IEEE Sens. J. 2017, 17, 7596–7610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. De Paz, J.F.; Bajo, J.; Rodríguez, S.; Villarrubia, G.; Corchado, J.M. Intelligent system for lighting control in smart cities. Inf. Sci. 2016, 372, 241–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Aydin, I.; Karakose, M.; Karakose, E. A navigation and reservation based smart parking platform using genetic optimization for smart cities. In Proceedings of the 2017 5th International Istanbul Smart Grid and Cities Congress and Fair (ICSG), Istanbul, Turkey, 19–21 April 2017; pp. 120–124. [Google Scholar]
  17. Shi, L.; Nazir, S.; Chen, L.; Zhu, R. Secure Convergence of Artificial Intelligence and Internet of Things for cryptographic cipher- a decision support system. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2021, 80, 31451–31463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Nazir, S.; Ali, Y.; Ullah, N.; García-Magariño, I. Internet of Things for Healthcare Using Effects of Mobile Computing: A Systematic Literature Review. Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput. 2019, 2019, 5931315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kang, B.; Kim, S.; Choi, M.-I.; Cho, K.; Jang, S.; Park, S. Analysis of types and importance of sensors in smart home services. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE 18th International Conference on High Performance Computing and Communications; IEEE 14th International Conference on Smart City; IEEE 2nd International Conference on Data Science and Systems (HPCC/SmartCity/DSS), Sydney, NSW, Australia, 12–14 December 2016; pp. 1388–1389. [Google Scholar]
  20. Patsakis, C.; Venanzio, R.; Bellavista, P.; Solanas, A.; Bouroche, M. Personalized medical services using smart cities’ infrastructures. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA), Lisboa, Portugal, 11–12 June 2014; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  21. Csáji, B.C.; Kemény, Z.; Pedone, G.; Kuti, A.; Váncza, J. Wireless multi-sensor networks for smart cities: A prototype system with statistical data analysis. IEEE Sens. J. 2017, 17, 7667–7676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Jia, G.; Han, G.; Rao, H.; Shu, L. Edge computing-based intelligent manhole cover management system for smart cities. IEEE Internet Things J. 2017, 5, 1648–1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Duangsuwan, S.; Takarn, A.; Nujankaew, R.; Jamjareegulgarn, P. A study of air pollution smart sensors lpwan via nb-iot for thailand smart cities 4.0. In Proceedings of the 2018 10th International Conference on Knowledge and Smart Technology (KST), Chiang Mai, Thailand, 31 January–3 February 2018; pp. 206–209. [Google Scholar]
  24. García-Magariño, I.; Nasralla, M.M.; Nazir, S. Real-Time Analysis of Online Sources for Supporting Business Intelligence Illustrated with Bitcoin Investments and IoT Smart-Meter Sensors in Smart Cities. Eectronics 2020, 9, 1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Amin, R.; Nazir, S.; García-Magariño, I. A Collocation Method for Numerical Solution of Nonlinear Delay Integro-Differential Equations for Wireless Sensor Network and Internet of Things. Sensors 2020, 20, 1962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Amin, R.; Nazir, S.; Magrino, I.G. Efficient sustainable algorithm for numerical solution of nonlinear delay Fredholm-Volterra integral equations via Haar wavelet for dense sensor networks in emerging telecommunications. Trans. Emerg. Telecommun. Technol. 2019, 33, e3877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, S.; Cao, H.; Wang, D.; Li, A. Security of Intelligent Sensors and Their Collaborative Roles in Human Resource Management in the Development of Smart Cities. Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput. 2022, 2022, 6285777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Doran, D.; Gokhale, S.; Dagnino, A. Human sensing for smart cities. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, Niagara Falls, ON, Canada, 25–28 August 2013; pp. 1323–1330. [Google Scholar]
  29. Cugurullo, F. Urban Artificial Intelligence: From Automation to Autonomy in the Smart City. Front. Sustain. Cities 2020, 2, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yigitcanlar, T.; Desouza, K.C.; Butler, L.; Roozkhosh, F. Contributions and Risks of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Building Smarter Cities: Insights from a Systematic Review of the Literature. Energies 2020, 13, 1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hang, Y.; Khan, S.; Alharbi, A.; Nazir, S. Assessing English teaching linguistic and artificial intelligence for efficient learning using analytical hierarchy process and Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution. J. Softw. Evol. Process 2022, e2462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bandyopadhyay, S. Comparison among multi-criteria decision analysis techniques: A novel method. Prog. Artif. Intell. 2021, 10, 195–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.