Next Article in Journal
A Survey on Security and Privacy in Emerging Sensor Networks: From Viewpoint of Close-Loop
Previous Article in Journal
Application of MEMS Accelerometers and Gyroscopes in Fast Steering Mirror Control Systems
Open AccessReview

Balance Improvement Effects of Biofeedback Systems with State-of-the-Art Wearable Sensors: A Systematic Review

1
Interdisciplinary Division of Biomedical Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China
2
Rehabilitation Engineering Research Institute, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing 100068, China
3
Li Ning Sports Science Research Center, Beijing 101111, China
4
Institute of Active Ageing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Vittorio M. N. Passaro
Sensors 2016, 16(4), 434; https://doi.org/10.3390/s16040434
Received: 31 January 2016 / Revised: 19 March 2016 / Accepted: 21 March 2016 / Published: 25 March 2016
(This article belongs to the Section Physical Sensors)
Falls and fall-induced injuries are major global public health problems. Balance and gait disorders have been the second leading cause of falls. Inertial motion sensors and force sensors have been widely used to monitor both static and dynamic balance performance. Based on the detected performance, instant visual, auditory, electrotactile and vibrotactile biofeedback could be provided to augment the somatosensory input and enhance balance control. This review aims to synthesize the research examining the effect of biofeedback systems, with wearable inertial motion sensors and force sensors, on balance performance. Randomized and non-randomized clinical trials were included in this review. All studies were evaluated based on the methodological quality. Sample characteristics, device design and study characteristics were summarized. Most previous studies suggested that biofeedback devices were effective in enhancing static and dynamic balance in healthy young and older adults, and patients with balance and gait disorders. Attention should be paid to the choice of appropriate types of sensors and biofeedback for different intended purposes. Maximizing the computing capacity of the micro-processer, while minimizing the size of the electronic components, appears to be the future direction of optimizing the devices. Wearable balance-improving devices have their potential of serving as balance aids in daily life, which can be used indoors and outdoors. View Full-Text
Keywords: falls; wearable sensors; balance; inertial motion sensors; force sensors; real-time biofeedback; sensory augmentation falls; wearable sensors; balance; inertial motion sensors; force sensors; real-time biofeedback; sensory augmentation
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Ma, C.Z.-H.; Wong, D.W.-C.; Lam, W.K.; Wan, A.H.-P.; Lee, W.C.-C. Balance Improvement Effects of Biofeedback Systems with State-of-the-Art Wearable Sensors: A Systematic Review. Sensors 2016, 16, 434. https://doi.org/10.3390/s16040434

AMA Style

Ma CZ-H, Wong DW-C, Lam WK, Wan AH-P, Lee WC-C. Balance Improvement Effects of Biofeedback Systems with State-of-the-Art Wearable Sensors: A Systematic Review. Sensors. 2016; 16(4):434. https://doi.org/10.3390/s16040434

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ma, Christina Z.-H.; Wong, Duo W.-C.; Lam, Wing K.; Wan, Anson H.-P.; Lee, Winson C.-C. 2016. "Balance Improvement Effects of Biofeedback Systems with State-of-the-Art Wearable Sensors: A Systematic Review" Sensors 16, no. 4: 434. https://doi.org/10.3390/s16040434

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop