Transcriptional Responses to Alkaline pH Across Fungi: Common and Differential Features, and Biotechnological Applications
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. The Transcriptional Response to High pH Across Fungi
2.1. Saccharomyces cerevisiae
| Organism | Experimental Conditions | Technology | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Saccharomyces cerevisiae | |||
| pH 6.0 to 7.9, time course 0–100 min, WT | Affymetrix YE6100 gene chips | [8] | |
| pH 4.0 to pH 8.0 (2 h), WT, rim101 mutant | GeneFilter macroarray | [11] | |
| pH 6.4 to 7.6 (5, 25, 45 min), WT | DNA microarrays [17] | [18] | |
| pH 6.2 to 8.0, at 10, 20, and 45 min (WT, cnb1, crz1 mutants) | DNA microarrays [17] | [19] | |
| pH 6.2 to pH 8.2, WT, and slt2 mutant (15 and 30 min) | DNA microarrays [17] | [20] | |
| pH 5.5 to pH 8.0, WT and msn2 msn4 mutant (10 and 30 min,) | DNA microarrays [17] | [21] | |
| pH 5.5 to pH 8.0/glucose starvation, snf1 mutant, 10 min | DNA microarrays [17] | [22] | |
| Time course, pH 8.0, Genomic run-On, comparison with other stresses and mRNA instability | DNA microarrays [17] | [23] | |
| Aspergillus nidulans | |||
| pH 4.0 to 8.0, WT and sltA mutant (1 h) | RNA-seq | [24] | |
| Aspergillus niger | |||
| Growth at pH 2.5, 4.5 and 6.0 | Affimetrix microarrays | [25] | |
| Aspergillus fumigatus | |||
| pH 5.0 to 8.0, 1 h | Af293 DNA amplicon microarrays | [26] | |
| pH 5 to 8, time course (5, 15 30, 45, and 60 min) | TIGR A. fumigatus oligo slides v. 3 | [27] | |
| Candida albicans | |||
| WT and rim101 mutant, pH 4.0 to pH 8.0, (4 h) | DNA microarrays | [28] | |
| pH 4 and 7.6 (several hours), WT, rim101−/− strain, and strain overexpressing RIM101 | RNA-seq | [29] | |
| Aureobasidium pullulans | |||
| Growth at pH 4, 7, and 10 | RNA-seq | [30] | |
| Ustilago maydis | |||
| pH 9.0 for 14 h, WT and rim101 mutant | DNA microarrays NimbleGen | [31] | |
| pH 3.0, 7.0, and 9.0 for 16 h | DNA microarrays NimbleGen | [32] | |
| Trichoderma reesei | |||
| pH 3, 4.5, and 6, after 17 and 24 h | DNA microarrays | [33] | |
| Trichoderma virens | |||
| pH 4 to 8.0, pacC +/− (1 h) | DNA microarrays (oligos) | [34] | |
| Schizosaccharomyces pombe | |||
| pH 5.4 to 8.0 (2 h) | DNA microarrays (3D-Gene S. pombe Yeast Oligo Chip 6k) | [35] | |
| Debaryomyces hansenii | |||
| pH 6 to pH 8.0, +/− 1 M Na+ (3 h) | DNA microarrays | [36] | |
| Komagataella phaffii | |||
| pH 5.5 to pH 8 8.2, WT strain on YPD and YPGly (15, 30, and 60 min) | RNA-seq | [37] | |
| pH 5.5 to pH 8, WT, crz1 and rim101 mutants (15, 30, and 60 min) | RNA-seq | [38] |
2.2. Aspergillus nidulans
2.3. Aspergillus fumigatus
2.4. Aspergillus niger
2.5. Candida albicans
2.6. Schizosaccharomyces pombe
2.7. Debaryomyces hansenii
2.8. Aureobasidium pullulans
2.9. Trichoderma sp.
2.10. Ustilago maydis
2.11. Komagataella phaffii
3. An Integrative Overview of the Transcriptional Responses to Alkaline pH

4. Linking the Alkaline Transcriptional Response to Biotechnological Applications
5. Conclusions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Brakhage, A.A.; Spröte, P.; Al-Abdallah, Q.; Gehrke, A.; Plattner, H.; Tüncher, A. Regulation of Penicillin Biosynthesis in Filamentous Fungi. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 2004, 88, 45–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Davis, D. Adaptation to Environmental PH in Candida Albicans and Its Relation to Pathogenesis. Curr. Genet. 2003, 44, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Serra-Cardona, A.; Canadell, D.; Ariño, J. Coordinate Responses to Alkaline PH Stress in Budding Yeast. Microb. Cell 2015, 2, 182–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cornet, M.; Gaillardin, C. PH Signaling in Human Fungal Pathogens: A New Target for Antifungal Strategies. Eukaryot. Cells 2014, 13, 342–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maeda, T. The Signaling Mechanism of Ambient PH Sensing and Adaptation in Yeast and Fungi. FEBS J. 2012, 279, 1407–1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farhadi Cheshmeh Morvari, S.; McCann, B.L.; Bignell, E.M. Conserved and Divergent Features of PH Sensing in Major Fungal Pathogens. Curr. Clin. Microbiol. Rep. 2023, 10, 120–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ariño, J. Integrative Responses to High PH Stress in S. Cerevisiae. OMICS 2010, 14, 517–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Causton, H.C.; Ren, B.; Koh, S.S.; Harbison, C.T.; Kanin, E.; Jennings, E.G.; Lee, T.I.; True, H.L.; Lander, E.S.; Young, R.A. Remodeling of Yeast Genome Expression in Response to Environmental Changes. Mol. Biol. Cell 2001, 12, 323–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Garciadeblas, B.; Rubio, F.; Quintero, F.J.; Banuelos, M.A.; Haro, R.; Rodriguez-Navarro, A. Differential Expression of Two Genes Encoding Isoforms of the ATPase Involved in Sodium Efflux in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1993, 236, 363–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, S.K.; Han, S.B.; Snyder, M.; Choi, E.Y. SHC1, a High PH Inducible Gene Required for Growth at Alkaline PH in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1999, 255, 116–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lamb, T.M.; Xu, W.; Diamond, A.; Mitchell, A.P. Alkaline Response Genes of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae and Their Relationship to the RIM101 Pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 1850–1856, Erratum in J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 12476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ogawa, N.; DeRisi, J.; Brown, P.O. New Components of a System for Phosphate Accumulation and Polyphosphate Metabolism in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Revealed by Genomic Expression Analysis. Mol. Biol. Cell 2000, 11, 4309–4321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gerasimaite, R.; Mayer, A. Enzymes of Yeast Polyphosphate Metabolism: Structure, Enzymology and Biological Roles. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2016, 44, 234–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Puig, S.; Askeland, E.; Thiele, D.J. Coordinated Remodeling of Cellular Metabolism during Iron Deficiency through Targeted MRNA Degradation. Cell 2005, 120, 99–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Philpott, C.C.; Protchenko, O.; Kim, Y.W.; Boretsky, Y.; Shakoury-Elizeh, M. The Response to Iron Deprivation in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae: Expression of Siderophore-Based Systems of Iron Uptake. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2002, 30, 698–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lyons, T.J.; Gasch, A.P.; Gaither, L.A.; Botstein, D.; Brown, P.O.; Eide, D.J. Genome-Wide Characterization of the Zap1p Zinc-Responsive Regulon in Yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 7957–7962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alberola, T.M.; Garcia-Martinez, J.; Antunez, O.; Viladevall, L.; Barcelo, A.; Arino, J.; Perez-Ortin, J.E. A New Set of DNA Macrochips for the Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae: Features and Uses. Int. Microbiol. 2004, 7, 199–206. [Google Scholar]
- Serrano, R.; Ruiz, A.; Bernal, D.; Chambers, J.R.; Arino, J. The Transcriptional Response to Alkaline PH in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae: Evidence for Calcium-Mediated Signalling. Mol. Microbiol. 2002, 46, 1319–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Viladevall, L.; Serrano, R.; Ruiz, A.; Domenech, G.; Giraldo, J.; Barcelo, A.; Arino, J. Characterization of the Calcium-Mediated Response to Alkaline Stress in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 43614–43624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Serrano, R.; Martín, H.; Casamayor, A.; Ariño, J.; Martin, H.; Casamayor, A.; Arino, J. Signaling Alkaline PH Stress in the Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae through the Wsc1 Cell Surface Sensor and the Slt2 MAPK Pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 39785–39795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casado, C.; González, A.; Platara, M.; Ruiz, A.; Ariño, J. The Role of the Protein Kinase A Pathway in the Response to Alkaline PH Stress in Yeast. Biochem. J. 2011, 438, 523–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casamayor, A.; Serrano, R.; Platara, M.; Casado, C.; Ruiz, A.; Ariño, J. The Role of the Snf1 Kinase in the Adaptive Response of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae to Alkaline PH Stress. Biochem. J. 2012, 444, 39–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Canadell, D.; García-Martínez, J.; Alepuz, P.; Pérez-Ortín, J.E.; Ariño, J. Impact of High PH Stress on Yeast Gene Expression: A Comprehensive Analysis of MRNA Turnover during Stress Responses. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Gene Regul. Mech. 2015, 1849, 653–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Picazo, I.; Etxebeste, O.; Requena, E.; Garzia, A.; Espeso, E.A. Defining the Transcriptional Responses of Aspergillus Nidulans to Cation/Alkaline PH Stress and the Role of the Transcription Factor SltA. Microb. Genom. 2020, 6, e000415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andersen, M.R.; Lehmann, L.; Nielsen, J. Systemic Analysis of the Response of Aspergillus Niger to Ambient PH. Genome Biol. 2009, 10, R47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McDonagh, A.; Fedorova, N.D.; Crabtree, J.; Yu, Y.; Kim, S.; Chen, D.; Loss, O.; Cairns, T.; Goldman, G.; Armstrong-James, D.; et al. Sub-Telomere Directed Gene Expression during Initiation of Invasive Aspergillosis. PLoS Pathog. 2008, 4, e1000154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Loss, O.; Bertuzzi, M.; Yan, Y.; Fedorova, N.; McCann, B.L.; Armstrong-James, D.; Espeso, E.A.; Read, N.D.; Nierman, W.C.; Bignell, E.M. Mutual Independence of Alkaline- and Calcium-Mediated Signalling in Aspergillus Fumigatus Refutes the Existence of a Conserved Druggable Signalling Nexus. Mol. Microbiol. 2017, 106, 861–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bensen, E.S.; Martin, S.J.; Li, M.; Berman, J.; Davis, D.A. Transcriptional Profiling in Candida Albicans Reveals New Adaptive Responses to Extracellular PH and Functions for Rim101p. Mol. Microbiol. 2004, 54, 1335–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Garnaud, C.; García-Oliver, E.; Wang, Y.; Maubon, D.; Bailly, S.; Despinasse, Q.; Champleboux, M.; Govin, J.; Cornet, M. The Rim Pathway Mediates Antifungal Tolerance in Candida Albicans through Newly Identified Rim101 Transcriptional Targets, Including Hsp90 and Ipt1. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62, 10–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, K.; Wang, W.; Yang, Q. Transcriptome Analysis Reveals the Regulation of Aureobasidium Pullulans under Different PH Stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 16103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Franco-Frías, E.; Ruiz-Herrera, J.; Aréchiga-Carvajal, E.T. Transcriptomic Analysis of the Role of Rim101/PacC in the Adaptation of Ustilago Maydis to an Alkaline Environment. Microbiology 2014, 160, 1985–1998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cervantes-Montelongo, J.A.; Aréchiga-Carvajal, E.T.; Ruiz-Herrera, J. Adaptation of Ustilago Maydis to Extreme PH Values: A Transcriptomic Analysis. J. Basic Microbiol. 2016, 56, 1222–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Häkkinen, M.; Sivasiddarthan, D.; Aro, N.; Saloheimo, M.; Pakula, T.M. The Effects of Extracellular PH and of the Transcriptional Regulator PACI on the Transcriptome of Trichoderma Reesei. Microb. Cell Factories 2015, 14, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Trushina, N.; Levin, M.; Mukherjee, P.K.; Horwitz, B.A. PacC and PH-Dependent Transcriptome of the Mycotrophic Fungus Trichoderma Virens. BMC Genom. 2013, 14, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tominaga, A.; Higuchi, Y.; Mori, H.; Akai, M.; Suyama, A.; Yamada, N.; Takegawa, K. Catechol O-Methyltransferase Homologs in Schizosaccharomyces Pombe Are Response Factors to Alkaline and Salt Stress. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 103, 4881–4887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sánchez, N.S.; Calahorra, M.; Ramírez, J.; Peña, A. Salinity and High PH Affect Energy Pathways and Growth in Debaryomyces Hansenii. Fungal Biol. 2018, 122, 977–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Albacar, M.; Zekhnini, A.; Pérez-Valle, J.; Martínez, J.L.; Casamayor, A.; Ariño, J. Transcriptomic Profiling of the Yeast Komagataella Phaffii in Response to Environmental Alkalinization. Microb. Cell Factories 2023, 22, 63, https://doi.org/10.1186/S12934-023-02074-6. Erratum in Microb. Cell Factories 2023, 22, 210. [Google Scholar]
- Albacar, M.; Casamayor, A.; Zekhnini, A.; González, A.; Ariño, J. Signaling Pathways Contributing to the Transcriptional Response to Alkalinization in Komagataella Phaffii: Role of the Transcription Factors Crz1 and Rim101. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 35841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lamb, T.M.; Mitchell, A.P. The Transcription Factor Rim101p Governs Ion Tolerance and Cell Differentiation by Direct Repression of the Regulatory Genes NRG1 and SMP1 in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2003, 23, 677–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Penalva, M.A.; Arst, H.N., Jr. Regulation of Gene Expression by Ambient PH in Filamentous Fungi and Yeasts. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2002, 66, 426–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Platara, M.; Ruiz, A.; Serrano, R.; Palomino, A.; Moreno, F.; Arino, J. The Transcriptional Response of the Yeast Na+-ATPase ENA1 Gene to Alkaline Stress Involves Three Main Signaling Pathways. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 36632–36642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Serrano, R.; Bernal, D.; Simón, E.; Arino, J. Copper and Iron Are the Limiting Factors for Growth of the Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae in an Alkaline Environment. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 19698–19704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Roque, A.; Petrezsélyová, S.; Serra-Cardona, A.; Ariño, J. Genome-Wide Recruitment Profiling of Transcription Factor Crz1 in Response to High PH Stress. BMC Genom. 2016, 17, 662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spielvogel, A.; Findon, H.; Arst, H.N.; Araújo-Bazán, L.; Hernández-Ortíz, P.; Stahl, U.; Meyer, V.; Espeso, E.A. Two Zinc Finger Transcription Factors, CrzA and SltA, Are Involved in Cation Homoeostasis and Detoxification in Aspergillus Nidulans. Biochem. J. 2008, 414, 419–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Penalva, M.A.; Arst, H.N., Jr. Recent Advances in the Characterization of Ambient PH Regulation of Gene Expression in Filamentous Fungi and Yeasts. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2004, 58, 425–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, R.; Chen, Y.; Wang, W.; Chen, J.; Liu, D.; Zhang, L.; Xiang, Q.; Zhao, K.; Ma, M.; Yu, X.; et al. Combined Transcriptomic and Metabolomic Analysis Revealed That PH Changes Affected the Expression of Carbohydrate and Ribosome Biogenesis-Related Genes in Aspergillus Niger SICU-33. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1389268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davis, D.A. How Human Pathogenic Fungi Sense and Adapt to PH: The Link to Virulence. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2009, 12, 365–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cornet, M.; Gaillardin, C.; Richard, M.L. Deletions of the Endocytic Components VPS28 and VPS32 in Candida Albicans Lead to Echinocandin and Azole Hypersensitivity. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2006, 50, 3492–3495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.; Liang, Y.; Zhang, B.; Zheng, W.; Xing, L.; Li, M. Alkaline Stress Triggers an Immediate Calcium Fluctuation in Candida Albicans Mediated by Rim101p and Crz1p Transcription Factors. FEMS Yeast Res. 2011, 11, 430–439. [Google Scholar]
- Higuchi, Y.; Mori, H.; Kubota, T.; Takegawa, K. Analysis of Ambient PH Stress Response Mediated by Iron and Copper Intake in Schizosaccharomyces Pombe. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2018, 125, 92–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benito, B.; Garciadeblas, B.; Rodriguez-Navarro, A. Potassium- or Sodium-Efflux ATPase, a Key Enzyme in the Evolution of Fungi. Microbiology 2002, 148, 933–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gostinčar, C.; Ohm, R.A.; Kogej, T.; Sonjak, S.; Turk, M.; Zajc, J.; Zalar, P.; Grube, M.; Sun, H.; Han, J.; et al. Genome Sequencing of Four Aureobasidium Pullulans Varieties: Biotechnological Potential, Stress Tolerance, and Description of New Species. BMC Genom. 2014, 15, 549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schmoll, M.; Schuster, A. Biology and Biotechnology of Trichoderma. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 87, 787–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Barone, G.D.; Emmerstorfer-Augustin, A.; Biundo, A.; Pisano, I.; Coccetti, P.; Mapelli, V.; Camattari, A. Industrial Production of Proteins with Pichia Pastoris—Komagataella Phaffii. Biomolecules 2023, 13, 441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dancis, A.; Yuan, D.S.; Haile, D.; Askwith, C.; Eide, D.; Moehle, C.; Kaplan, J.; Klausner, R.D. Molecular Characterization of a Copper Transport Protein in S. Cerevisiae: An Unexpected Role for Copper in Iron Transport. Cell 1994, 76, 393–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Askwith, C.; Eide, D.; Van Ho, A.; Bernard, P.S.; Li, L.; Davis-Kaplan, S.; Sipe, D.M.; Kaplan, J. The FET3 Gene of S. Cerevisiae Encodes a Multicopper Oxidase Required for Ferrous Iron Uptake. Cell 1994, 76, 403–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martínez-Pastor, M.T.; Puig, S. Adaptation to Iron Deficiency in Human Pathogenic Fungi. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res. 2020, 1867, 118797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eisendle, M.; Oberegger, H.; Buttinger, R.; Illmer, P.; Haas, H. Biosynthesis and Uptake of Siderophores Is Controlled by the PacC-Mediated Ambient-PH Regulatory System in Aspergillus Nidulans. Eukaryot. Cell 2004, 3, 561–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schrettl, M.; Ibrahim-Granet, O.; Droin, S.; Huerre, M.; Latgé, J.P.; Haas, H. The Crucial Role of the Aspergillus Fumigatus Siderophore System in Interaction with Alveolar Macrophages. Microbes Infect. 2010, 12, 1035–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Austin, S.; Mayer, A. Phosphate Homeostasis—A Vital Metabolic Equilibrium Maintained Through the INPHORS Signaling Pathway. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yip, H.M.; Cheng, S.; Olson, E.J.; Crone, M.; Maerkl, S.J. Perfect Adaptation Achieved by Transport Limitations Governs the Inorganic Phosphate Response in S. Cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2023, 120, e2212151120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, B.Z.; Zhou, X.; O’Shea, E.K. Evolution of Reduced Co-Activator Dependence Led to Target Expansion of a Starvation Response Pathway. eLife 2017, 6, e25157, https://doi.org/10.7554/ELIFE.25157. Erratum in eLife 2017, 11, e84187. [Google Scholar]
- Carter-O’Connell, I.; Peel, M.T.; Wykoff, D.D.; O’Shea, E.K. Genome-Wide Characterization of the Phosphate Starvation Response in Schizosaccharomyces Pombe. BMC Genom. 2012, 13, 697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lev, S.; Djordjevic, J.T. Why Is a Functional PHO Pathway Required by Fungal Pathogens to Disseminate within a Phosphate-Rich Host: A Paradox Explained by Alkaline PH-Simulated Nutrient Deprivation and Expanded PHO Pathway Function. PLoS Pathog. 2018, 14, e1007021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Michonneau, F.; Brown, J.W.; Winter, D.J. Rotl: An R Package to Interact with the Open Tree of Life Data. Methods Ecol. Evol 2016, 7, 1476–1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hinchliff, C.E.; Smith, S.A.; Allman, J.F.; Burleigh, J.G.; Chaudhary, R.; Coghill, L.M.; Crandall, K.A.; Deng, J.; Drew, B.T.; Gazis, R.; et al. Synthesis of Phylogeny and Taxonomy into a Comprehensive Tree of Life. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 12764–12769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zvyagilskaya, R.A.; Lundh, F.; Samyn, D.; Pattison-Granberg, J.; Mouillon, J.M.; Popova, Y.; Thevelein, J.M.; Persson, B.L. Characterization of the Pho89 Phosphate Transporter by Functional Hyperexpression in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 2008, 8, 685–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Acosta-Zaldívar, M.; Qi, W.; Mishra, A.; Roy, U.; King, W.R.; Li, Y.; Patton-Vogt, J.; Anderson, M.Z.; Köhler, J.R. Candida Albicans’ Inorganic Phosphate Transport and Evolutionary Adaptation to Phosphate Scarcity. PLoS Genet. 2024, 20, e1011156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Köhler, J.R.; Acosta-Zaldívar, M.; Qi, W. Phosphate in Virulence of Candida Albicans and Candida Glabrata. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Serra-Cardona, A.; Petrezsélyová, S.; Canadell, D.; Ramos, J.; Ariño, J. Coregulated Expression of the Na+/Phosphate Pho89 Transporter and Ena1 Na+-ATPase Allows Their Functional Coupling under High-PH Stress. Mol. Cell Biol. 2014, 34, 4420–4435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, Z.P.; McCullough, N.; Martel, R.; Hemmingsen, S.; Young, P.G. Gene Amplification at a Locus Encoding a Putative Na+/H+ Antiporter Confers Sodium and Lithium Tolerance in Fission Yeast. EMBO J. 1992, 11, 1631–1640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dutta, D.; Fliegel, L. Structure and Function of Yeast and Fungal Na+/H+ Antiporters. IUBMB Life 2018, 70, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mager, W.H.; De Kruijff, A.J. Stress-Induced Transcriptional Activation. Microbiol. Rev. 1995, 59, 506–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiong, L.; Zeng, Y.; Tang, R.Q.; Alper, H.S.; Bai, F.W.; Zhao, X.Q. Condition-Specific Promoter Activities in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae. Microb. Cell Factories 2018, 17, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahn, J.; Hong, J.; Park, M.; Lee, H.; Lee, E.; Kim, C.; Lee, J.; Choi, E.S.; Jung, J.K.; Lee, H. Phosphate-Responsive Promoter of a Pichia Pastoris Sodium Phosphate Symporter. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 3528–3534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xie, Z.; Fong, W.P.; Tsang, P.W.K. Engineering and Optimization of Phosphate-Responsive Phytase Expression in Pichia Pastoris Yeast for Phytate Hydrolysis. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2020, 137, 109533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bernat-Camps, N.; Ebner, K.; Schusterbauer, V.; Fischer, J.E.; Nieto-Taype, M.A.; Valero, F.; Glieder, A.; Garcia-Ortega, X. Enabling Growth-Decoupled Komagataella Phaffii Recombinant Protein Production Based on the Methanol-Free PDH Promoter. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2023, 11, 1130583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ebner, K.; Bernat-Camps, N.; Scheipel, S.; Dörner, C.; Valero, F.; Glieder, A.; Garcia-Ortega, X. Next-Generation Stress-Inducible Komagataella Phaffii Promoter Variants. Microb. Cell Factories 2025, 24, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, X.; Xu, K.; Ahmad, N.; Qin, L.; Li, C. Recent Advances in Engineering of Microbial Cell Factories for Intelligent PH Regulation and Tolerance. Biotechnol. J. 2021, 16, 2100151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rajkumar, A.S.; Liu, G.; Bergenholm, D.; Arsovska, D.; Kristensen, M.; Nielsen, J.; Jensen, M.K.; Keasling, J.D. Engineering of Synthetic, Stress-Responsive Yeast Promoters. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, e136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, L.; Schmelzer, B.; Wilkinson, S.; Mattanovich, D. From Natural to Synthetic: Promoter Engineering in Yeast Expression Systems. Biotechnol. Adv. 2024, 77, 108446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zekhnini, A.; Casamayor, A.; Ariño, J. Combinatorial Alkali-Responsive Hybrid Promoters as Tools for Heterologous Protein Expression in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae. Microb. Biotechnol. 2025, 18, e70213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stathopoulos, A.M.; Cyert, M.S. Calcineurin Acts through the CRZ1/TCN1-Encoded Transcription Factor to Regulate Gene Expression in Yeast. Genes Dev. 1997, 11, 3432–3444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zekhnini, A.; Albacar, M.; Casamayor, A.; Ariño, J. The ENA1 Na+-ATPase Gene Is Regulated by the SPS Sensing Pathway and the Stp1/Stp2 Transcription Factors. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 5548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

| Induced Genes |
|---|
| Phosphate transport and metabolism |
| PHO89, PHO84, PHO12, VTC1, VTC3, VTC4, SPL2, PHM7 |
| Iron and copper homeostasis |
| FRE1, FET3, FET5, FIT1, FIT2, FIT3, ARN1, ARN2, TIS11 |
| Oxidative stress response |
| NCE103, GRX1, GRX6, TSA2, GRE3 |
| Glycogen metabolism |
| GSY1, GSY2, GLC3, GDB1, GLG1, GIP2, GLC8, PIG2 |
| Trehalose metabolism |
| TPS1, TPS2, TPS3, TSL1, ATH1, NTH1 |
| Sugar transport |
| HXT2, HXT7, HXT6, HXT4, HXT5 |
| Na+/K+ transport |
| ENA1, ENA2, KHA1 |
| Cell wall |
| SRL3, DFG5, SKT5 (1), GSC2, CRH1 |
| Acetate synthesis |
| ALD3, ALD2, ALD4, ALD6, ACS1 |
| Amino acid metabolism (2) |
| Arg biosynthesis (ARG4, ARG3, ALT1, ARG7, ARG1) |
| Cys and Met metabolism (SER3, STR3, SER33, ADI1, SER1) |
| His metabolism (HIS4, HIS5, ALD3, ALD2) |
| Repressed genes |
| Ribosomal proteins |
| RPS22A, RPL14A, RPS25B, RPL42A, RPL25, RPL33B, RPS10A, RPS9A, RPL19A, RPS16B, RPL12B, RPL27B, RPS23A, RPL42B |
| Ribosomal biogenesis |
| JJJ1, RRB1, RPB95, DBP10, ARB1, NOC2, BMT5, PWP1, SDA1, KRI1, RRS1, ZUO1, NSR1 |
| Induced Genes |
|---|
| Phosphate transport and metabolism |
| AN8956 (PHO89) |
| Iron and copper homeostasis |
| AN3690, AN8365, AN7518, AN5397, AN5378, AN3763, AN3264, AN0878 |
| Amino acid metabolism |
| AN4355, AN10298, AN5426, AN5610, AN1673, AN0840, AN4401, AN1883, AN6231, AN5701, AN5886, AN8866, AN7722, AN0717, AN5957, AN1990, AN5999, AN2914, AN2873, AN6782 |
| tRNA aminoacylation |
| AN9157, AN7479, AN1913, AN5662, AN0705, AN10195, AN10475, AN0057, AN1380, AN11125, AN2150, AN4550 |
| Glucan and chitin metabolism |
| AN2388, AN3046, AN8480, AN0558, AN9380, AN1602 |
| Na+/K+ transport |
| AN1628, AN6642, AN5035, AN4131 |
| Repressed genes |
| Phosphate transport and metabolism |
| AN1612 (PHO84), AN5935 (PHO84), AN5549 (GIT1), AN1148 (PPN1), AN8363 (PHO11) |
| Fatty acid biosynthesis |
| AN8412, AN1034, AN7855, AN4135, AN7856, AN2035, AN2032, AN3612, AN6731, AN3396, AN0981, AN0918, AN7825, AN0523, AN3386, AN3282, AN9407, AN10430, AN1036, AN6126, AN3276, AN3381 |
| Na+/K+ transport |
| AN7250, AN1022 |
| Induced Genes |
|---|
| Phosphate transport and metabolism |
| PHO84 (C1_11480W_A), PHO89 (C4_01940W_A), PHO8 (C1_10430W_A), PHO100 (C1_07430W_A), GDE1 (C5_04510W_A), PHO4 (C4_05680W_A), VTC3 (CR_03610C_A) |
| Iron, copper, and zinc homeostasis |
| FRE7 (CR_07290W_A), FRE30 (CR_07280W_A), SIT1 (C2_08050C_A), FET34 (C6_00440C_A), FET31 (C6_00480C_A), FRE9 (C2_05070W_A), SMF3 (C2_00580C_A), SMF12 (C2_07160W_A), FRP2 (C7_00100W_A), CFL1 (C4_05770C_A), CFL2 (C4_05780C_A), FTH1 (C1_09400C_A), FLC1 (C3_00980W_A), FTR1/2 (C1_14220C_A), CTR1 (C6_00790C_A), ZRT1 (C4_06970C_A), CCC2 (C5_03020W_A) |
| Na+/K+ transport |
| ENA2 (C1_00390W_A), ENA21 (C7_02910W_A), C3_01680C_A |
| Antioxidant activity |
| GPX2 (C6_00840W_A), SOD4 (C2_00660C_A), SOD5 (C2_00680C_A) |
| Cell wall and hyphal growth |
| ALS10 (orf19.2355), ALS1 (C6_03700W_A), CHT2 (C5_04130C_A), CRH1 (C4_02900C_A), ECM38 (C4_03540C_A), KRE6 (C3_05830W_A), PHR1 (C4_04530C_A), PRA1 (C4_06980W_A), SRB1 (C3_07950C_A), UAP1 (C5_02530W_A), HYR1 (C1_13450W_A), ECM21 (C1_10180C_A), MP65 (C2_10030C_A), PGA31 (C4_04080C_A), CSA1 (C7_00090C_A), ECE1 (C4_03470C_A), HWP1 (C4_03570W_A), HYR1 (C1_13450W_A), IHD1 (C6_03850C_A), RBT1 (C4_03520C_A), RBT4 (C1_07030C_A), SAP4 (C6_03500C_A), SAP6 (C6_02710C_A), SAP9 (C3_03870C_A), SAP5 (C6_03030W_A) |
| Ribosomal proteins |
| RPL10A (C6_02240C_A), RPL11 (C2_06810C_A), RPL13 (C1_03020C_A), RPL15A (CR_04100C_A), RPL16A (C1_00180W_A), RPL18 (C3_05100C_A), RPL21A (C2_03810C_A), RPL23A (C6_02070C_A), RPL3 (C2_09430W_A), RPL4B (C1_14110C_A), RPL5 (C7_01790C_A), RPL8B (C3_05240C_A), RPL9B (C3_02470C_A), RPS1 (C1_03090W_A), RPS12 (C3_07150C_A), RPS15 (C3_04670C_A), RPS18 (C7_00960W_A), RPS20 (CR_08150W_A), RPS22A (C1_06460C_A), RPS26A (C2_01610C_A), RPS4A (C2_10620W_A), RPS6A (C4_01270W_A), RPS7A (C3_01490W_A), RPS8A (C2_05610C_A) |
| Amino acid metabolism |
| AAT1 (C2_05250C_A), ARO4 (C1_05110C_A), ARO7 (C1_11500C_A), ARO8 (C2_00340C_A), CAR1 (C5_04490C_A), CAR2 (C4_00160C_A), CYS3 (CR_08340W_A), CYS4 (C1_01870C_A), IDP1 (C2_05890C_A), ILV6 (C4_01370W_A), LEU3 (C5_02180C_A), PRO3 (C4_00240C_A), PUT1 (C5_02600W_A), PUT2 (C5_04880C_A), SAH1 (C5_04270C_A), SAM2 (C1_11450C_A), SAM4 (C1_08410C_A), MET15 (C4_00200C_A) |
| Amino acid transport |
| GAP6 (C5_03500W_A), GAP1 (C5_02790C_A), HIP1 (C5_01800C_A), GNP2 (CR_09920W_A), MUP1 (C1_11870W_A), AGP2 (C4_01100C_A) |
| Repressed Genes |
| Iron, copper, and zinc homeostasis |
| CCC1 (C3_03710W_A), CRP1 (C1_09250W_A), FRE10 (C4_04320W_A), ZRT2 (C2_02590W_A), CFL4 (C5_01360W_A), FET3 (C6_00460C_A), CTR2 (C1_08620W_A) |
| Sugar transport |
| HGT17 (C4_01070W_A), HGT19 (C3_00220W_A), HGT13 (C7_00290C_A) *, HXT5 (CR_03450W), HGT10 (C6_03790C_A) |
| Amino acid metabolism |
| ACO1 (CR_08210C_A), ARG1 (CR_00620C_A), ARG3 (C6_03230W_A), ARG4 (C7_03570W_A), ARG5, 6 (C1_09290C_A), ARO10 (CR_06860C_A), CHA1 (C2_01270W_A), CPA1 (C4_01550C_A), GAD1 (C1_11660W_A), GLT1 (C1_06550W_A), LEU1 (CR_00360C_A), CAN1 (C6_00960W_A), LEU4 (C1_00170W_A), MET16 (C4_07030W_A), GAP2 (C3_05580C_A) |
| Antioxidant activity |
| GTT12 (C3_03600C_A), SOD2 (C1_01520C_A), DOT5 (C3_00480C_A), TTR1 (C1_00490C_A), AHP1 (C4_02410C_A), CCP1 (C3_02480C_A), CAT1 (C1_06810W_A) |
| Electron transfer |
| SDH2 (CR_05180C_A), NDH51 (C2_04550C_A), FESUR1 (C3_07060W_A), RIP1 (C3_04430W_A), C2_07550W_A, NUC2 (C7_01900W_A), CYT1 (C2_04950C_A), TTR1 (C1_00490C_A), CYC1 (C2_10110W_A), C5_01960C_A |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ariño, J. Transcriptional Responses to Alkaline pH Across Fungi: Common and Differential Features, and Biotechnological Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 11450. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262311450
Ariño J. Transcriptional Responses to Alkaline pH Across Fungi: Common and Differential Features, and Biotechnological Applications. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26(23):11450. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262311450
Chicago/Turabian StyleAriño, Joaquín. 2025. "Transcriptional Responses to Alkaline pH Across Fungi: Common and Differential Features, and Biotechnological Applications" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 23: 11450. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262311450
APA StyleAriño, J. (2025). Transcriptional Responses to Alkaline pH Across Fungi: Common and Differential Features, and Biotechnological Applications. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(23), 11450. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262311450
