Next Article in Journal
Atypical Presentations and Molecular Diagnosis of Ocular Bartonellosis
Previous Article in Journal
Interaction Between the UCP2 rs659366 Polymorphism and Dietary Capsaicin Intake in Relation to the Inflammatory State in Mexican Adults
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Identification of Quantitative Trait Loci and Candidate Genes Involved in Rice Seedling Growth Under Hypoxic Stress

1
Department of Applied Biosciences, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Republic of Korea
2
Coastal Agriculture Research Institute, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Republic of Korea
3
Natural and Medical Science Research Center, University of Nizwa, Nizwa 616, Oman
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(21), 10420; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262110420
Submission received: 6 October 2025 / Revised: 24 October 2025 / Accepted: 25 October 2025 / Published: 27 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Plant Sciences)

Abstract

Studying hypoxia in rice is particularly important because oxygen deficiency during germination severely limits seedling establishment. Understanding the molecular and physiological mechanisms underlying hypoxic tolerance is therefore crucial for improving rice yield stability under flooded or waterlogged conditions. Progress in developing rice cultivars that thrive under flooding and low oxygen (hypoxic) conditions has been limited over the past two decades due to a lack of tolerant plant varieties and a limited understanding of genetic mechanisms. This study evaluated hypoxia tolerance in the Cheongcheong Nagdong Double Haploid (CNDH) rice population, along with their parent lines, for hypoxia tolerance. Significant phenotypic differences were identified, with the Cheongcheong and CNDH lines CNDH13, CNDH35, and CNDH91 showing strong hypoxia tolerance, while Nagdong and CNDH lines CNDH14-2, CNDH43, and CNDH50-1 were susceptible to hypoxia. Root length was unaffected by hypoxia, while shoot length and fresh weight were key tolerance indicators. Comprehensive quantitative trait loci (QTL) analysis based on logarithm of the odds (LOD) scores above 3.0 identified three QTLs associated with hypoxia tolerance, indicating significant genetic control: qSL-8 and qSL-10 (shoot length) and qFW-2 (fresh weight). The gene expression analysis performed under hypoxic conditions highlighted that 35 candidate genes within these QTL regions exhibited differential regulation: Os02g0184200, Os08g0430200, Os08g0431900, and Os08g0432500 were upregulated, whereas Os08g0439100, Os10g0343400, Os10g0395400, and Os10g0405600 were downregulated in both resistant and susceptible lines. Os08g0431900 displayed significant expression changes correlating with hypoxia resistance. Phylogenetic and protein–protein interaction analyses revealed that Os08g0431900 is highly conserved and interacts with proteins involved in stress responses, suggesting that these proteins are crucial in hypoxia tolerance. These findings provide valuable insights into the genetic basis of hypoxia tolerance and identify key genes for future breeding programs to develop hypoxia-resistant rice varieties.

1. Introduction

Global warming has highlighted flooding as a serious worldwide issue, which poses a significant threat to plants, especially crops. Flooding impacts rice plant growth and photosynthesis, leading to severe yield losses [1]. Moreover, flooding can occur as waterlogging or submergence, reducing oxygen availability to plants and causing hypoxia [2]. Plant cells experience hypoxic conditions in various situations, such as waterlogged soil, flooding, dense plant tissues, seeds with gas-blocking layers, underground plant parts, or growth at high altitudes [3,4]. Subsequently, terrestrial plants have developed various adaptations to avoid severe hypoxia in their organs or enhance metabolism when oxygen is scarce [5]. For instance, rice adapts to flooding or deepwater by employing an escape strategy, producing long stems through rapid internode elongation. Additionally, rice can increase in length by 20 to 25 cm daily under flooded conditions to ensure its leaves remain above the water and normal respiration occurs [6]. Studies have shown that rice regulates phytohormones, such as ethylene, abscisic acid, and gibberellin, under deepwater conditions to enhance internode length [7,8]. Despite this rapid elongation, rice under deepwater conditions exhibits the same morphology as ordinary paddy rice [9].
In higher plants, oxygen deprivation disrupts essential cellular functions, such as mitochondrial respiration, ATP production, and overall energy supply, potentially resulting in cell death [10]. Here, the absence of oxygen means the reduced compounds generated during glycolysis and the Krebs cycle cannot be re-oxidized via the electron transport chain. Consequently, plants switch to a fermentative pathway, where NADH produced by glycolysis is re-oxidized, allowing some ATP production. During hypoxia, plants adapt by reprogramming their metabolism through the expression of specific genes that aid in overcoming adverse environmental conditions [11,12,13,14]. Waterlogging and flooding adversely affect the growth and seed production of nearly all crops, resulting in significant agricultural productivity losses and threatening food security. For instance, between 2010 and 2014, extreme monsoon rains in Pakistan led to widespread flooding, which resulted in the loss of at least 11 billion tons of crops, including rice, sugarcane, maize, and cotton, resulting in an economic losses exceeding USD 16 billion [15]. In Europe, the rise in rainfall intensity has led to numerous flooding events with severe economic impacts [16]. The detrimental effect of flooding on plant performance is primarily due to the reduction in tissue oxygen levels. Notably, rice is the only crop species capable of surviving extended periods of submergence; however, the growth and yield of rice are also affected by hypoxic conditions.
The molecular mechanisms through which plants respond to hypoxic conditions, such as flooding, submergence, and waterlogging, have been extensively studied using Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and rice (Oryza sativa) as model organisms [2]. Indeed, plants quickly adjust the transcription rates of various genes during changes in cellular oxygen levels. Therefore, these genes are crucial for optimizing energy use, maintaining oxygen balance, and protecting against harmful anaerobic metabolism byproducts. Rice is a semi-aquatic plant, meaning the roots of rice plants exhibit significant tolerance to hypoxic stress. MADS-box transcription factors are key regulators of various developmental and environmental responses in plants, including tolerance to abiotic stresses, such as hypoxia or submergence. Specifically, MADS-box transcription factor 23 (MADS23) plays a role in enhancing tolerance to such conditions in plants through several mechanisms. Notably, oxygen levels are limited under hypoxia or submergence conditions, meaning plants must switch from aerobic respiration to anaerobic metabolism to survive. Meanwhile, MADS-box transcription factors (TFs) have been implicated in performing key roles in adapting plants to abiotic stress. However, the underlying mechanisms through which the MADS-box proteins regulate plant stress responses remain largely unclear. MADS23 may also modulate hormone signaling pathways that are important for stress responses, such as ABA and ethylene. Moreover, MADS23 can regulate ABA-responsive genes, promoting stomatal closure, reducing water loss, and enhancing survival under stress conditions. A recent study reported that overexpression of the OsMADS23 TF in rice plants significantly conferred osmotic stress [17]. Xingxing Li et al. (2021) further noted that the OsMADS23 TF enhanced the indigenous ABA and proline biosynthesis pathways by regulating OsNCED2, OsNCED3, OsNCED4, and OsP5CR, which are the main components in these processes [17]. Several studies have reported that ABA is a key hormone in plant growth regulation, development, seed germination, seed dormancy, seed longevity, and seedling establishment [18,19,20,21]. The MADS23 TF induces ABA, which results in stomata formation on submerged leaves, thus controlling stomatal movement by regulating the size of guard cells and finally mediating water potential in plants [21,22,23]. Meanwhile, OsMADS23 in rice plants is reportedly involved in ABA-induced stomata closure [1]. Reports show that ABA accumulation during hypoxic stress is inhibited while the catabolism cascade is increased, and thus, exogenous ABA can increase the tolerance of plants to hypoxic stress [24,25]. Some reports have evaluated that ABA pretreatment of soybean plants enables the plant to withstand flooding due to ABA-induced glycolysis, fermentation, and the tricarboxylic acid cycle [26,27,28].
Furthermore, data from previous reports have predicted that MADS23 can regulate ethylene, which modifies the hypoxic stress response in rice plants. The MADS-box protein SICMB1 has been reported to regulate ethylene biosynthesis in tomato plants [29]. Ethylene is the initial signal for plant adaptation in flooding/hypoxia conditions, which governs ABA, GA, and auxin, all of which affect plant growth and development under hypoxic stress [24,30,31,32]. Moreover, ethylene plays a role in bud elongation, aerenchyma formation, and the development of adventitious roots under flooding/hypoxic conditions [33,34,35]. Mechanistically, the MADS protein is supposed to induce ethylene, inhibit the expression of NCEDs, reduce ABA, and enhance GA, leading to rapid shoot elongation during submergence [36]. Meanwhile, ethylene and its precursor, 1-aminocyclopropane carboxylic acid (ACC), rapidly induce OsABA8ox1 expression, promoting ABA degradation under flooding, whereas 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) inhibits this effect [37]. Submergence enhances ABA degradation in a Sub1A-independent manner, and exogenous ABA reduces Sub1 gene expression [38]. This suggests that ABA reduction is crucial for Sub1 accumulation during submergence and highlights the need to explore the mechanisms through which ethylene regulates ABA biosynthesis and signaling under hypoxic stress. Furthermore, adventitious roots are important for coping with hypoxic stress: Adventitious roots can form and grow under water and absorb oxygen more than regular roots. Meanwhile, it has been reported that silencing the MADS-box protein in tomatoes promoted the positive regulation of adventitious roots [39]. Aerenchyma formation is a critical adaptive feature under hypoxic conditions that facilitates oxygen diffusion from shoots to roots. It has been reported that in MADS-box gene transgenic rice plants, the aerenchyma in leaves differentiated earlier than in the wild-type plants. The aerenchyma cavities were also larger in transgenic rice plants than in wild-type plants. These results show that the MADS protein enhances parenchyma development and increases the cavity size [40]. It is assumed that MADS-box transcription factor 23 enhances hypoxia or submergence stress tolerance in plants by regulating anaerobic metabolism, hormone pathways, and morphological adaptations. This integrated response allows plants to survive in low-oxygen environments.
Over the past two decades, researchers have employed various strategies to enhance seedling growth and develop seeds that thrive under flooding and low oxygen conditions. Despite these efforts, progress has been slow due to a shortage of tolerant plant varieties and a limited understanding of the genetic factors involved. Thus, identifying the QTLs or genes associated with seed germination and seedling growth under low oxygen conditions can greatly aid in developing cultivars resistant to low oxygen and flooding. The doubled haploid (DH) method offers significant advantages in plant breeding by enabling the rapid development of completely homozygous lines in a single generation. This technique not only shortens the breeding cycle but also enhances the precision of genetic analysis and quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping. In rice, DH populations such as the Cheongcheong Nagdong Double Haploid (CNDH) lines provide an ideal resource for studying complex traits, including tolerance to abiotic stresses like hypoxia. The uniform genetic background of DH lines allows for accurate phenotypic evaluation and facilitates the identification of stable QTLs and candidate genes associated with stress tolerance. Therefore, this study aimed to identify rice lines within the CNDH population resistant or susceptible to hypoxic conditions. This study also sought to pinpoint the specific QTLs and genes linked to hypoxia tolerance. This research will contribute to breeding rice varieties that can better withstand environments with low oxygen and flooding.

2. Results

2.1. Evaluation of Hypoxia-Resistant and Susceptible CNDH Lines

This study assessed the responses of 120 CNDH lines and their parent lines to hypoxic conditions. The plants were continuously submerged for two weeks to simulate hypoxic stress. After treatment, the plants were evaluated by measuring shoot length, root length, and fresh weight to assess their resistance or susceptibility to hypoxic conditions. The results indicated that the Cheongcheong parent line exhibited significant resilience under hypoxic conditions, maintaining higher shoot length and fresh weight than the Nagdong parent line, which showed susceptibility with significantly reduced shoot length and fresh weight (Figure 1A,C). Within the CNDH population, lines CNDH13, CNDH35, and CNDH91 demonstrated enhanced shoot length and fresh weight under hypoxic conditions, indicating strong resistance similar to the Cheongcheong parent line, whereas CNDH lines CNDH14-2, CNDH43, and CNDH50-1 exhibited markedly reduced shoot length and fresh weight, paralleling the susceptibility seen in the Nagdong parent line (Figure 1A,C). Interestingly, hypoxic conditions did not significantly impact the root length across resistant and susceptible lines (Figure 1B). The phenotypes based on hypoxia conditions among the CNDH population are listed in Figure S1. The frequency distribution of shoot length, root length, and fresh weight in the CNDH population was assessed using histograms (Figure 1D–F). Normality was further evaluated using the D’Agostino–Pearson and Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests. The results indicated that shoot length and root length followed a normal distribution, whereas fresh weight deviated from normality (Table S1). These observations suggest that they are quantitative in nature and likely regulated by multiple genes. Based on the correlation analysis, all traits exhibited a positive correlation, with no negative correlation observed. In particular, fresh weight demonstrated a highly significant positive correlation with shoot length and root length (Figure 2A). Principal component analysis (PCA) revealed that the first two PCs accounted for 77% of the variance in the dataset. With an eigenvalue of 1.59, PC1 was the primary contributor, representing 52.87% of the total variation and impacting most observed traits. Additionally, PC2 had an eigenvalue of 0.78 and represented 25.88% of the total variability (Figure 2B). Further, the parent lines and selected CNDH lines were categorized into resistant and susceptible groups based on overall plant health under hypoxia. The Cheongcheong and CNDH lines CNDH13, CNDH35, and CNDH91 maintained normal growth and displayed minimal adverse effects from hypoxic stress. In contrast, the Nagdong and CNDH lines CNDH14-2, CNDH43, and CNDH50-1 were significantly affected, with some plants exhibiting severe damage or death (Figure S1). This phenotypic categorization facilitated subsequent gene expression analysis related to hypoxia tolerance, identifying Cheongcheong, Nagdong and CNDH lines CNDH13, CNDH35, CNDH91, CNDH14-2, CNDH43, and CNDH50-1 as promising candidates for further genetic studies and potential breeding programs aimed at enhancing hypoxia tolerance in rice.

2.2. Genetic Mapping of Hypoxia-Responsive QTLs

To investigate the genetic basis of hypoxia tolerance, we performed a comprehensive QTL analysis using shoot length, root length, and fresh weight as phenotypic traits. In two independent trials, these traits were measured in parent lines and across all CNDH lines. Based on our phenotypic data, we identified three QTLs with a LOD score exceeding 3.0. These QTLs were distributed across three chromosomes: one QTL was detected on chromosome 2, one on chromosome 8, and one on chromosome 10 (Figure 3). Specifically, two QTLs were associated with shoot length (qSL-8 and qSL-10), and one with fresh weight (qFW-2). The lack of overlapping QTLs among the identified regions suggests that these traits are not influenced by multiple genomic regions but rather by specific loci. We focused on QTLs with a LOD score higher than 3 to detect candidate genes highly associated with hypoxic stress. Consequently, we selected three QTLs that showed a higher LOD score: qSL-8 and qSL-10, associated with shoot length, and qFW-2, related to fresh weight. These QTLs were detected on chromosomes 8, 10, and 2, respectively (Figure 4 and Table 1). The qSL-8 QTL exhibited a LOD score of 3.02 and was located between markers RM264 and RM23314. The qSL-10 QTL exhibited a LOD score of 5.03 and was located between markers RM25128 and RM25036. The qFW-2 QTL exhibited a LOD score of 3.60 and was located between markers RM12339 and RM12532. The phenotypic variation proportion attributable to qSL-8, qSL-10, and qFW-2 was 34%, 28%, and 28%, respectively, derived from the alleles of Cheongcheong and Nagdong (Figure 4 and Table 1). These findings provide valuable insights into the genetic loci associated with hypoxia tolerance, potentially guiding future research and breeding programs to improve this trait.

2.3. Selection and Relative Expression of Candidate Genes Regulated Against Hypoxia

To refine our analysis and identify the most promising candidate genes associated with hypoxia tolerance, we specifically assessed QTLs with a LOD score above 3 since this score is recognized as a significant threshold for gene evaluation, providing a robust basis for reducing potential regions of interest. Based on this criterion, we selected three QTLs: one between markers RM264 and RM23314 on chromosome 8, a second between markers RM25128 and RM25036 on chromosome 10, and a third one between markers RM12339 and RM12532 on chromosome 2. Within these regions, we identified 119 genes between markers RM264 and RM23314, 291 genes between markers RM25128 and RM25036, and 263 genes between markers RM12339 and RM12532. These genes were annotated using the NCBI and RiceXpro databases and selected based on their predicted functional annotations. From this selection, nine genes on qSL-8, 11 on qSL-10, and 15 on qFW-2 were chosen (Table S3). Figure 5 illustrates the phylogenetic relationships and functional annotations of the selected genes across the three QTLs using a Venn diagram.
To investigate the genes most closely associated with hypoxic stress, we determined the relative expression levels of the 35 selected genes (from qSL-8, qSL-10, and qFW-2) by qRT-PCR under hypoxic conditions. This analysis was conducted using parent lines as well as three resistant (CNDH13, CNDH35, and CNDH91) and three susceptible lines (CNDH14-2, CNDH43, and CNDH50-1) (Figure 6). The qRT-PCR results revealed that several genes presented significant changes in expression under hypoxic conditions. Notably, Os02g0184200, Os08g0430200, Os08g0431900, and Os08g0432500 were significantly upregulated in resistant and susceptible lines under hypoxic stress compared to control plants. Conversely, Os08g0439100, Os10g0343400, Os10g0395400, and Os10g0405600 were significantly downregulated in resistant and susceptible lines under hypoxic stress compared to control plants. Specifically, the expression of Os08g0431900 was induced in hypoxic stress compared to control plants in all the lines. The expression pattern and functional annotation of the Os08g0431900 gene indicate that Os08g0431900 is highly associated with hypoxic stress. These findings underscore the importance of Os08g0431900 as a potential target for improving hypoxia tolerance through genetic and breeding strategies. Overall, by focusing on QTLs with high LOD scores and conducting detailed gene expression analyses, we have identified key genetic elements that play crucial roles in the hypoxia response of plants. This approach provides valuable insights for future research and practical applications in enhancing plant hypoxia tolerance.

2.4. Phylogenetic, Sequence Homology, and Protein–Protein Interaction Analysis of Selected Genes

The Os08g0431900 (OsMADS23q8) gene was identified due to its transcriptional regulation in rice lines under hypoxic stress. This finding suggests that Os08g0431900 plays a crucial role in the molecular response to hypoxia. Given the significant roles of Os08g0431900 in the stress responses, Os08g0431900 is a promising candidate for further functional characterization and could be a valuable target in breeding programs to improve hypoxia tolerance in rice plants. Hence, we conducted a series of analyses to gain deeper insights into the Os08g0431900 gene, including phylogenetic studies, sequence homology assessments with other grass species, and protein–protein interaction evaluations using MEGA 11, NCBI, and STRING programs, respectively.
The phylogenetic analysis of Os08g0431900 revealed a high degree of sequence conservation among several species within the Poaceae family. Notably, Os08g0431900 shares substantial similarities with homologous genes from Oryza brachyantha, Oryza glaberrima, Panicum hallii, Phragmites australis, Sorghum bicolor, and Zea mays (Figure 7A,B). This conservation suggests that Os08g0431900 has a functionally important role preserved across these species. Additionally, protein domain analysis showed that Os08g0431900 exhibits sequence homology with several well-characterized proteins involved in stress responses, such as MPK2, MPK4, MPK5, MPK6, MPK8, MPK11, MPK13, MPK15, MPK16, and Q0DBX9_ORYSJ (Figure 7C).
In summary, the phylogenetic, sequence homology, and protein–protein interaction analyses of Os08g0431900 underscore its critical roles in the hypoxic stress response. The high degree of sequence conservation and the identified protein interactions support the notion that Os08g0431900 is functionally significant in stress adaptation. These insights provide a foundation for targeted functional studies to elucidate the precise mechanisms through which Os08g0431900 contributes to hypoxia tolerance and highlight their potential as targets for genetic improvement efforts to develop rice varieties with enhanced resilience to hypoxic conditions.

3. Discussion

This study provides significant insights into the genetic mechanisms underlying hypoxia tolerance in rice, a trait of paramount importance for cultivation in regions prone to flooding. We identified phenotypic markers and genetic loci associated with hypoxia tolerance by evaluating the CNDH rice population and its parent lines under continuous submergence. The observed differential responses, particularly in shoot length and fresh weight, underscore the complexity of hypoxia resistance. Our comprehensive analysis of QTLs pinpointed specific regions on chromosomes 2, 8, and 10, highlighting key genetic determinants. The current study identified 35 hub genes associated with hypoxic stress based on phenotypic evaluations in the QTL analysis. These findings advance our understanding of the genetic basis for hypoxia tolerance and pave the way for targeted breeding strategies to develop resilient rice varieties.
The primary goal of crop breeding technologies is to develop new cultivars better suited to withstand stress conditions. This study evaluated 120 CNDH lines for their response to hypoxic stress induced by deepwater conditions. Based on growth patterns and phenotypic assessments under these conditions, we categorized the CNDH population into resistant and susceptible lines. Among the resistant lines, we identified three highly resistant (CNDH13, CNDH35, and CNDH91) and three highly susceptible lines (CNDH14-2, CNDH43, and CNDH50-1). These selected lines were further evaluated for the expression of specific genes to validate their response to hypoxic stress. Phenotypic assessments revealed that the resistant lines exhibited significantly higher shoot length and fresh weight than the susceptible lines; meanwhile, both the shoot length and fresh weight demonstrated a normal distribution (Figure 1). Similarly, root length was significantly reduced in the susceptible lines compared to the resistant lines, indicating that low oxygen stress negatively affected root development in the susceptible genotypes (Figure 1B). Unlike many other crops, rice plants possess unique adaptive traits that enable them to tolerate submergence. One such trait is the development of aerenchyma. These longitudinally interconnected gas-filled spaces within plant tissues facilitate internal aeration by allowing the transfer of gases between the shoots and roots [41,42,43]. Additionally, rice benefits from leaf gas films, thin layers of air trapped between submerged leaves and surrounding water, which enhance internal aeration during submergence. This adaptation significantly contributes to the ability of the plants to survive and thrive under submerged conditions [44,45,46]. However, many lowland rice cultivars can still succumb to complete submergence, whereby the leaves and stems of these plants only moderately elongate to reach the surface of the water, which often depletes the energy reserves and can lead to death when the flooding becomes too deep and prolonged [47,48]. Some researchers suggest that rice sometimes adopts a strategy of reduced growth to conserve carbohydrates for long-term survival under deepwater conditions [49]. In contrast, our study noted that the resistant CNDH lines (CNDH13, CNDH35, and CNDH91) exhibited increased stem elongation to survive. In contrast, the susceptible lines (CNDH14-2, CNDH43, and CNDH50-1) showed reduced growth and died under prolonged complete submergence. Our results demonstrate that significantly enhanced shoot length during prolonged and complete submergence is a key strategy for hypoxia tolerance in the resistant cell lines, indicating the ability of these plants to survive in deepwater conditions for extended periods. Furthermore, our results showed that the roots of hypoxia-susceptible lines were shorter than those of resistant lines (Figure 1). Several researchers have reported that oxygen supply to the root apex in anaerobic soil during submergence can cause reduced root length [41,42,50,51]. This aligns with our findings, where the reduced root length in susceptible lines under hypoxic conditions highlights the limited ability of these plants to cope with such stress compared to the resistant lines. Overall, our study highlights the importance of shoot elongation as a survival strategy under deepwater submergence and identifies specific CNDH lines that could be valuable for breeding programs to improve submergence tolerance in rice plants.
Additionally, this study identified several QTLs across different chromosomes by focusing primarily on QTLs related to hypoxia tolerance. However, based on a LOD score greater than 3.0, we selected three specific QTLs that are more specifically associated with hypoxic stress: qSL-8, qSL-10, and qFW-2. Furthermore, utilizing predicted functional annotations, we identified 35 genes potentially involved in hypoxic stress responses (Table S3). From the relative expression analysis of these genes, nine showed significant regulation in both resistant and susceptible lines under hypoxic conditions (Figure 6). These genes included Os02g0184200 (inorganic H+ pyrophosphatase family protein), Os08g0430200 (Rad23 family protein), Os08g0432500 (ClpS family protein), Os08g0439100 (Pleckstrin domain-containing protein), Os10g0343400 (cellulose synthase family protein (CSLF7)), Os10g0395400 (glutathione S-transferase), Os10g0405600 (phosphofructokinase family protein), and Os08g0431900 (MADS23). Among these, Os02g0184200, Os08g0430200, Os08g0432500, and Os08g0431900 were significantly enhanced in both the resistant and susceptible lines under hypoxic conditions compared to control plants. The likely reason for the upregulation of these four genes is the presence of hypoxia-responsive elements (HREs) in the promoter regions, which are activated under low oxygen conditions. HREs are specific DNA sequences that bind to transcription factors activated by hypoxia and promote the transcription of genes that help the plant cope with low oxygen levels. Additionally, these genes may play roles in stress response pathways activated under hypoxia, such as anaerobic respiration, which allows plants to produce energy without relying on oxygen. These genes could also be involved in metabolic adjustments that help conserve energy and resources during hypoxic stress, such as switching from aerobic to anaerobic metabolic pathways. Alternatively, the expressions of Os08g0439100, Os10g0343400, Os10g0405600, and Os10g0395400 were significantly reduced under hypoxic conditions in both the resistant and susceptible lines. Since these genes were downregulated in both cell lines, these data suggest that these genes might not have a direct role in hypoxic stress mitigation. Instead, suppressing these genes could be a strategy to conserve energy for essential survival processes. Hence, downregulating these genes could allow the plant to allocate more resources towards critical functions necessary for surviving low oxygen conditions. While both the resistant and susceptible lines show similar gene expression and suppression trends under hypoxic conditions, the resistant lines likely possess additional mechanisms or more efficient gene regulation processes that confer greater tolerance. However, the exact functions of these genes in response to hypoxia in rice have yet to be fully elucidated and require further molecular, physiological, anatomical, and metabolic assessment. Understanding these mechanisms in greater detail could provide valuable insights into improving hypoxia tolerance in rice and other crops.
Our study identified Os08g0431900 (MADS23 transcription factor) as a key gene among nine differentially regulated genes in resistant and susceptible CNDH lines under hypoxic stress based on its expression pattern and functional annotation; these data are consistent with previously published studies. OsMADS23 promotes the accumulation of endogenous ABA and proline by activating the transcription of key biosynthetic genes, including OsNCED2, OsNCED3, and OsNCED4 for ABA, and OsP5CR for proline [17]. Consistent with previous QTL-meta analyses identifying Os02g0304900, Os01g0568400, and Os01g0566500 as regulators of ABA metabolism and signaling during anaerobic germination [52], our study highlights MADS23 as a candidate gene modulating the ABA pathway, suggesting that ABA-mediated signaling is a conserved mechanism underlying hypoxia tolerance in rice seedlings. Os08g0431900 was significantly induced under hypoxic stress in both the susceptible and resistant lines (Figure 6). To elucidate the role of Os08g0431900 during hypoxic stress, it is essential to understand the mechanism through which the MADS family genes mitigate hypoxic stress. The MADS-box gene family comprises transcription factors characterized by a conserved DNA-binding domain known as the MADS-box. These genes are widely distributed across various living organisms and play diverse functional roles. MADS-box genes are classified into two major evolutionary lineages in plants: type I and type II [53,54]. Approximately 100 functionally active MADS-box genes have been identified in Arabidopsis and around 70 in rice [55]. OsMADS26 has been reported to trigger multiple responses associated with various stress conditions and roles in flower development, vegetative growth, and root development [56]. Interestingly, the cell lines overexpressing OsMADS26 demonstrated an increased expression of genes involved in ethylene biosynthesis, suggesting a potential role of OsMADS26 in regulating ethylene-related pathways [56]. It has also been reported that SICMB1 (MADS-box protein) regulates ethylene biosynthesis in tomato plants [29]. Ethylene promotes hypoxia tolerance in Arabidopsis [57] and acts as a primary signal for plant adaptation to flooding and hypoxic conditions, regulating key hormones such as ABA, GA, and auxins, which collectively modulate plant growth and development under these stress conditions [24,30,31,32]. Recently, integrating GWAS and transcriptome data identified five genes such as, LOC_Os01g07420, LOC_Os02g01890, LOC_Os03g45720, LOC_Os04g56920, and LOC_Os11g41680, potentially associated with rice hypoxic germination tolerance, with LOC_Os11g41680 encoding a cytochrome P450, and such genes are known to regulate plant height via brassinosteroid pathways acting synergistically with gibberellins and auxins [58,59]. Hypoxia-tolerant rice has higher levels of IAA, and applying IAA to sensitive varieties improves their survival, showing that IAA helps seedlings grow and cope with low-oxygen stress [60]. Additionally, ethylene is critical in promoting bud elongation, aerenchyma formation, and the development of adventitious roots; these processes are essential for plant survival in response to flooding and hypoxia [33,34,35]. Supporting this, a recent study on brassinosteroids in submerged rice found that among the differentially expressed genes (DEGs), several ethylene synthesis genes, along with GA oxidation and JA synthesis genes, were identified, highlighting the central role of ethylene in regulating coleoptile elongation under hypoxic conditions [61]. This study did not quantify ethylene levels due to resource limitations. However, qRT-PCR analysis indicated that rice plants may induce ethylene production through the upregulation of the MADS23 gene, suggesting a potential regulatory role of this gene in ethylene biosynthesis under hypoxic conditions. Additionally, ethylene stabilizes the ethylene-responsive factors (ERFs) [62], which are crucial in mitigating hypoxic stress. Consistent with our findings, several studies have reported the involvement of ERFs under hypoxic/low oxygen stress [3,63,64]. It was previously reported that rice varieties cultivated in deep paddies induce the ERF transcription factor, enabling rapid stem elongation in slowly established foods [65]. Recent studies have shown that the ERF transcription factor family is pivotal in regulating gene expression under low oxygen conditions, redundantly activating a range of hypoxia-responsive genes through direct promoter interaction [66,67,68]. For instance, overexpression of the ERF family member RAP2.12 induced the primary hypoxic transcriptional response in Arabidopsis [69]. Under hypoxic conditions, ERF–VII proteins stabilize and initiate the transcription of anaerobic genes by binding to the hypoxia-responsive promoter element (HRPE) in the promoter regions of these genes [68]. The fermentative genes PDC1 and ADH are activated anaerobic genes [64]. The transcriptional activation of these fermentation pathways, along with glycolysis, ensures the production of minimal ATP necessary for essential cellular functions, thereby maintaining cell integrity and viability under hypoxic conditions [70].
Overall, our research highlights critical genetic and phenotypic adaptations that confer hypoxia tolerance in rice plants. Identifying key QTLs and the expression of Os08g0431900 (MADS23 transcription factor) offer new insights into the mechanisms involved in hypoxia resistance. These findings suggest that MADS23 may be involved in ethylene biosynthesis, which plays a crucial role in plant adaptation to hypoxic stress by regulating key hormones, aerenchyma formation, and root development. Furthermore, the regulation of ethylene-responsive factors underscores the importance of these factors in mitigating hypoxic stress, with ERF transcription factors activating hypoxia-responsive genes to promote anaerobic metabolism and ensure plant survival. This insight expands our understanding of how the MADS-box protein and ethylene signaling contribute to stress tolerance mechanisms in rice, providing a foundation for future studies to enhance crop resilience under suboptimal environmental conditions.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Material and Experimental Design

The CNDH population was developed using a doubled haploid from a cross between Cheongcheong (Indica) and Nagdong (Japonica), originating from the F1 hybrid anther culture [71]. To identify hypoxia-resistant and susceptible lines within the CNDH population, we initially screened the entire population under hypoxic conditions. The experiment used 50 trays in a greenhouse maintained under optimal environmental conditions. Before planting, seeds were sterilized using Spotak pesticide (Hankooksamgong, Seoul, South Korea) and soaked for three days at 33 °C in an incubator, following a previous method [72]. After successful germination, the seeds were transferred to the trays, with ten seedlings grown per hole for each line. Two-week-old seedlings were subjected to hypoxic stress through submersion in a 30 cm deepwater tub for two weeks. Hypoxia has previously been reported to regulate the shoot length, root length, and fresh weight of the Medicago truncatula plant [73]. Therefore, measuring shoot length, root length, and fresh weight in rice under hypoxic conditions is essential to assess the physiological adaptations performed by each plant, such as shoot elongation for gas exchange and root development for nutrient uptake, both of which are impaired under low oxygen. Moreover, identifying the QTLs associated with these traits can aid in breeding rice varieties that are better adapted to hypoxic stress, ultimately improving survival and yield in flood-prone or waterlogged environments.

4.2. Construction of a Genetic Map and Analysis of QTLs Following Hypoxia

A total of 778 simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers were used to generate the genetic map of the CNDH population. A total of 423 SSR markers among the 778 SSR markers observed demonstrated a polymorphism, with 222 screened further using PCR amplification of the co-dominant genes [71,74]. The genetic map for the CNDH population covered a total distance of approximately 2112.7 cM, with an average marker spacing of 10.6 cM [75]. QTL analysis for hypoxia tolerance was conducted using Win QTL Cartographer 2.5 software (North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA). This software requires input of the genetic distances between markers, marker names, chromosome numbers, genotypic data, and target trait values. Composite Interval Mapping (CIM) was performed across the genome using a logarithm of the odds (LOD) score threshold set at 3.0 to ensure statistical significance in the QTL detection. Identified QTLs were named following the method proposed by McCough [76].

4.3. Annotation of Candidate Genes Related to Hypoxia

The identified QTLs were further examined for potential candidate genes using the RiceXpro database (https://ricexpro.dna.affrc.go.jp) and RAP-DB (https://rapdb.dna.affrc.go.jp), accessed in March 2024. Several candidate genes were identified between the two markers. Gene functions were annotated through Gene Ontology (GO) analysis, utilizing the resources provided by the Rice Genome Annotation Project (http://rice.uga.edu/index.shtml), also accessed in March 2024. To analyze homologous sequences, we employed NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) and Jalview 2.11.2.0 (https://www.jalview.org), with access in April 2024. Phylogenetic trees were constructed using MEGA 11 (https://www.megasoftware.net), and protein–protein interactions were assessed using STRING version 11.0 (https://string-db.org).

4.4. Relative Gene Expression

Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed to assess the expression levels of the selected candidate genes. Based on average shoot length, average root length, average fresh weight (three replicates of each single line), and overall plant health, three hypoxia-resistant rice lines (CNDH13, CNDH35, and CNDH91) and three hypoxia-susceptible rice lines (CNDH14-2, CNDH43, and CNDH50-1) were chosen, along with the parental lines Cheongcheong and Nagdong. These selected lines were grown under the same previously described hypoxic conditions. For RNA extraction, three leaves from three plants of each line were collected after two weeks of hypoxia treatment. RNA was isolated using the RNeasy Plant Mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized using the UltraScript 2.0 cDNA Synthesis kit (PCRBIOSYSTEM, Wayne, PA, USA) per the provided guidelines. qRT-PCR was performed using the StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR System (Fisher Scientific, Hampton, NH, USA) with 2X Real-time PCR Master Mix (including SYBR® Green I) (BIOFACT, Daejeon, Korea). The amplification conditions were as follows: polymerase activation at 95 °C for 10 min, denaturation and annealing at 95 °C for 15 s, and extension at 60 °C for 1 min. OsActin was used as the reference (housekeeping) gene, and relative expression levels were calculated using the 2−∆∆CT method [77]. The qRT-PCR assays were conducted in triplicate to determine the average and standard deviation. The primers used for the selected genes are listed in Table S2.

4.5. Statistical Analysis

To assess the significance of the differences between the means of the replicates, Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT) using SPSS (IBM SPSS Statistics, version 25, Redmond, WA, USA) and two-way ANOVA were conducted using GraphPad Prism software (version 8.0.2, Dotmatics, San Diego, CA, USA). Statistical significance is as follows: * indicates a p < 0.05, and ** represents a p < 0.01, reflecting the significance of differences among the three biological replicates.

5. Conclusions

Our study elucidates the genetic mechanisms underpinning hypoxia tolerance in rice plants, which is vital for cultivation in flood-prone areas. By assessing the CNDH rice population and its parent lines under continuous submergence, we identified phenotypic markers and genetic loci associated with hypoxia tolerance, specifically on chromosomes 2, 8, and 10. The differential expression of candidate genes, particularly Os08g0431900, and their conservation across related species underscore their potential roles in the hypoxia response. Our findings suggest enhanced shoot elongation is a critical strategy for hypoxia resistance, with resistant lines displaying significantly greater shoot length and fresh weight than susceptible lines. Expression analysis revealed nine genes significantly regulated under hypoxic conditions. Among these, Os08g0431900 was significantly expressed under hypoxic stress, indicating its involvement in hypoxic stress mitigation. This study advances our understanding of hypoxia tolerance in rice by identifying key genetic determinants and adaptive traits. These insights can provide a valuable framework for targeted breeding strategies to develop rice varieties resilient to flooding and hypoxic stress, ensuring sustainable rice production in vulnerable regions.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms262110420/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.K., R.J. and K.-M.K.; methodology, N.K.; software, N.K., S.A. (Saleem Asif); validation, R.J., S.A. (Sajjad Asaf) and K.-M.K.; formal analysis, N.K.; investigation, N.K., S.A. (Saleem Asif), and Z.K.; resources, K.-M.K.; data curation, K.-M.K.; writing—original draft preparation, N.K.; writing—review and editing, N.K., R.J., and S.A. (Sajjad Asaf); visualization, S.A. (Saleem Asif); supervision, K.-M.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Regional Innovation System & Education (RISE) Glocal 30 program through the Daegu RISE Center, funded by the Ministry of Education (MOE) and the Daegu, Republic of Korea, (2025-RISE-03-001). This work was carried out with the support of “Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science and Technology Development (Project No. RS-2025-00512751)” Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Gautam, P.; Lal, B.; Raja, R.; Tripathi, R.; Shahid, M.; Baig, M.; Puree, C.; Mohanty, S.; Nayak, A. Effect of simulated flash flooding on rice and its recovery after flooding with nutrient management strategies. Ecol. Eng. 2015, 77, 250–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Fukao, T.; Barrera-Figueroa, B.E.; Juntawong, P.; Peña-Castro, J.M. Submergence and waterlogging stress in plants: A review highlighting research opportunities and understudied aspects. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Giuntoli, B.; Licausi, F.; van Veen, H.; Perata, P. Functional balancing of the hypoxia regulators RAP2. 12 and HRA1 takes place in vivo in Arabidopsis thaliana plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Abbas, M.; Sharma, G.; Dambire, C.; Marquez, J.; Alonso-Blanco, C.; Proaño, K.; Holdsworth, M.J. An oxygen-sensing mechanism for angiosperm adaptation to altitude. Nature 2022, 606, 565–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bailey-Serres, J.; Voesenek, L. Flooding stress: Acclimations and genetic diversity. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008, 59, 313–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hattori, Y.; Miura, K.; Asano, K.; Yamamoto, E.; Mori, H.; Kitano, H.; Matsuoka, M.; Ashikari, M. A major QTL confers rapid internode elongation in response to water rise in deepwater rice. Breed. Sci. 2007, 57, 305–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kende, H.; Van Der Knaap, E.; Cho, H.-T. Deepwater rice: A model plant to study stem elongation. Plant Physiol. 1998, 118, 1105–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Métraux, J.-P.; Kende, H. The role of ethylene in the growth response of submerged deep water rice. Plant Physiol. 1983, 72, 441–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hamamura, K. Floating rice. Sci. Rice Plant 1993, 1, 66–70. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zaidi, P.H.; Rashid, Z.; Vinayan, M.T.; Almeida, G.D.; Phagna, R.K.; Babu, R. QTL mapping of agronomic waterlogging tolerance using recombinant inbred lines derived from tropical maize (Zea mays L) germplasm. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0124350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Loreti, E.; Poggi, A.; Novi, G.; Alpi, A.; Perata, P. A genome-wide analysis of the effects of sucrose on gene expression in Arabidopsis seedlings under anoxia. Plant Physiol. 2005, 137, 1130–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lasanthi-Kudahettige, R.; Magneschi, L.; Loreti, E.; Gonzali, S.; Licausi, F.; Novi, G.; Beretta, O.; Vitulli, F.; Alpi, A.; Perata, P. Transcript profiling of the anoxic rice coleoptile. Plant Physiol. 2007, 144, 218–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mustroph, A.; Lee, S.C.; Oosumi, T.; Zanetti, M.E.; Yang, H.; Ma, K.; Yaghoubi-Masihi, A.; Fukao, T.; Bailey-Serres, J. Cross-kingdom comparison of transcriptomic adjustments to low-oxygen stress highlights conserved and plant-specific responses. Plant Physiol. 2010, 152, 1484–1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Narsai, R.; Rocha, M.; Geigenberger, P.; Whelan, J.; van Dongen, J.T. Comparative analysis between plant species of transcriptional and metabolic responses to hypoxia. New Phytol. 2011, 190, 472–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rehman, A.; Jingdong, L.; Du, Y.; Khatoon, R.; Wagan, S.A.; Nisar, S.K. Flood disaster in Pakistan and its impact on agriculture growth (a review). Env. Dev Econ 2016, 6, 39–42. [Google Scholar]
  16. Olesen, J.E.; Trnka, M.; Kersebaum, K.C.; Skjelvåg, A.O.; Seguin, B.; Peltonen-Sainio, P.; Rossi, F.; Kozyra, J.; Micale, F. Impacts and adaptation of European crop production systems to climate change. Eur. J. Agron. 2011, 34, 96–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, X.; Yu, B.; Wu, Q.; Min, Q.; Zeng, R.; Xie, Z.; Huang, J. OsMADS23 phosphorylated by SAPK9 confers drought and salt tolerance by regulating ABA biosynthesis in rice. PLoS Genet. 2021, 17, e1009699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Zhou, W.; Chen, F.; Meng, Y.; Chandrasekaran, U.; Luo, X.; Yang, W.; Shu, K. Plant waterlogging/flooding stress responses: From seed germination to maturation. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 148, 228–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Khan, I.U.; Ali, A.; Khan, H.A.; Baek, D.; Park, J.; Lim, C.J.; Zareen, S.; Jan, M.; Lee, S.Y.; Pardo, J.M. PWR/HDA9/ABI4 complex epigenetically regulates ABA dependent drought stress tolerance in Arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chandrasekaran, U.; Luo, X.; Zhou, W.; Shu, K. Multifaceted signaling networks mediated by abscisic acid insensitive 4. Plant Commun. 2020, 1, 100040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Zhu, J.-K. Abiotic stress signaling and responses in plants. Cell 2016, 167, 313–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Iida, S.; Ikeda, M.; Amano, M.; Sakayama, H.; Kadono, Y.; Kosuge, K. Loss of heterophylly in aquatic plants: Not ABA-mediated stress but exogenous ABA treatment induces stomatal leaves in Potamogeton perfoliatus. J. Plant Res. 2016, 129, 853–862, Correction in J. Plant Res. 2017, 130, 1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. He, F.; Wang, H.L.; Li, H.G.; Su, Y.; Li, S.; Yang, Y.; Feng, C.H.; Yin, W.; Xia, X. Pe CHYR 1, a ubiquitin E3 ligase from Populus euphratica, enhances drought tolerance via ABA-induced stomatal closure by ROS production in Populus. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2018, 16, 1514–1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Dawood, T.; Yang, X.; Visser, E.J.; Te Beek, T.A.; Kensche, P.R.; Cristescu, S.M.; Lee, S.; Floková, K.; Nguyen, D.; Mariani, C. A co-opted hormonal cascade activates dormant adventitious root primordia upon flooding in Solanum dulcamara. Plant Physiol. 2016, 170, 2351–2364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. De Ollas, C.; González-Guzmán, M.; Pitarch, Z.; Matus, J.T.; Candela, H.; Rambla, J.L.; Granell, A.; Gómez-Cadenas, A.; Arbona, V. Identification of ABA-mediated genetic and metabolic responses to soil flooding in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L. Mill). Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 613059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Komatsu, S.; Han, C.; Nanjo, Y.; Altaf-Un-Nahar, M.; Wang, K.; He, D.; Yang, P. Label-free quantitative proteomic analysis of abscisic acid effect in early-stage soybean under flooding. J. Proteome Res. 2013, 12, 4769–4784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yin, X.; Nishimura, M.; Hajika, M.; Komatsu, S. Quantitative proteomics reveals the flooding-tolerance mechanism in mutant and abscisic acid-treated soybean. J. Proteome Res. 2016, 15, 2008–2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, X.; Sakata, K.; Komatsu, S. An integrated approach of proteomics and computational genetic modification effectiveness analysis to uncover the mechanisms of flood tolerance in soybeans. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Zhang, J.; Hu, Z.; Yao, Q.; Guo, X.; Nguyen, V.; Li, F.; Chen, G. A tomato MADS-box protein, SlCMB1, regulates ethylene biosynthesis and carotenoid accumulation during fruit ripening. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 3413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Steffens, B.; Wang, J.; Sauter, M. Interactions between ethylene, gibberellin and abscisic acid regulate emergence and growth rate of adventitious roots in deepwater rice. Planta 2006, 223, 604–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Vidoz, M.L.; Loreti, E.; Mensuali, A.; Alpi, A.; Perata, P. Hormonal interplay during adventitious root formation in flooded tomato plants. Plant J. 2010, 63, 551–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yang, X.; Jansen, M.J.; Zhang, Q.; Sergeeva, L.; Ligterink, W.; Mariani, C.; Rieu, I.; Visser, E.J. A disturbed auxin signaling affects adventitious root outgrowth in Solanum dulcamara under complete submergence. J. Plant Physiol. 2018, 224, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Voesenek, L.; Benschop, J.; Bou, J.; Cox, M.; Groeneveld, H.; Millenaar, F.; Vreeburg, R.; Peeters, A. Interactions between plant hormones regulate submergence-induced shoot elongation in the flooding-tolerant dicot Rumex palustris. Ann. Bot. 2003, 91, 205–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Rajhi, I.; Yamauchi, T.; Takahashi, H.; Nishiuchi, S.; Shiono, K.; Watanabe, R.; Mliki, A.; Nagamura, Y.; Tsutsumi, N.; Nishizawa, N.K. Identification of genes expressed in maize root cortical cells during lysigenous aerenchyma formation using laser microdissection and microarray analyses. New Phytol. 2011, 190, 351–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Nguyen, T.-N.; Tuan, P.A.; Mukherjee, S.; Son, S.; Ayele, B.T. Hormonal regulation in adventitious roots and during their emergence under waterlogged conditions in wheat. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 4065–4082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Wang, Q.; Wang, L.; Chandrasekaran, U.; Luo, X.; Zheng, C.; Shu, K. ABA biosynthesis and signaling cascades under hypoxia stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 661228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Saika, H.; Okamoto, M.; Miyoshi, K.; Kushiro, T.; Shinoda, S.; Jikumaru, Y.; Fujimoto, M.; Arikawa, T.; Takahashi, H.; Ando, M. Ethylene promotes submergence-induced expression of OsABA8ox1, a gene that encodes ABA 8′-hydroxylase in rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 2007, 48, 287–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Fukao, T.; Bailey-Serres, J. Submergence tolerance conferred by Sub1A is mediated by SLR1 and SLRL1 restriction of gibberellin responses in rice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 16814–16819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Li, A.; Chen, G.; Wang, Y.; Liang, H.; Hu, Z. Silencing of the MADS-box gene SlMADS83 enhances adventitious root formation in tomato plants. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2020, 39, 941–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Fornara, F.; Parenicová, L.; Falasca, G.; Pelucchi, N.; Masiero, S.; Ciannamea, S.; Lopez-Dee, Z.; Altamura, M.M.; Colombo, L.; Kater, M.M. Functional characterization of OsMADS18, a member of the AP1/SQUA subfamily of MADS box genes. Plant Physiol. 2004, 135, 2207–2219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Armstrong, W. Aeration in higher plants. In Advances in Botanical Research; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1980; Volume 7, pp. 225–332. [Google Scholar]
  42. Colmer, T. Long-distance transport of gases in plants: A perspective on internal aeration and radial oxygen loss from roots. Plant Cell Environ. 2003, 26, 17–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Colmer, T.; Pedersen, O. Oxygen dynamics in submerged rice (Oryza sativa). New Phytol. 2008, 178, 326–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Colmer, T.D.; Pedersen, O. Underwater photosynthesis and respiration in leaves of submerged wetland plants: Gas films improve CO2 and O2 exchange. New Phytol. 2008, 177, 918–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Pedersen, O.; Rich, S.M.; Colmer, T.D. Surviving floods: Leaf gas films improve O2 and CO2 exchange, root aeration, and growth of completely submerged rice. Plant J. 2009, 58, 147–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Raskin, I.; Kende, H. How does deep water rice solve its aeration problem. Plant Physiol. 1983, 72, 447–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Bailey-Serres, J.; Fukao, T.; Ronald, P.; Ismail, A.; Heuer, S.; Mackill, D. Submergence tolerant rice: SUB1’s journey from landrace to modern cultivar. Rice 2010, 3, 138–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Jackson, M.B.; Ram, P.C. Physiological and molecular basis of susceptibility and tolerance of rice plants to complete submergence. Ann. Bot. 2003, 91, 227–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Colmer, T.; Voesenek, L. Flooding tolerance: Suites of plant traits in variable environments. Funct. Plant Biol. 2009, 36, 665–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Colmer, T.; Bloom, A. A comparison of NH4+ and NO3–net fluxes along roots of rice and maize. Plant Cell Environ. 1998, 21, 240–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Jackson, M.; Armstrong, W. Formation of aerenchyma and the processes of plant ventilation in relation to soil flooding and submergence. Plant Biol. 1999, 1, 274–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Snehi, S.; Singh, P.K.; Beena, R.; Kota, S.; Sanwal, S.K.; Kiran, K.R.; Anilkumar, C.; Chattopadhyay, K.; Prakash, N.R.; Sah, R.P. QTL-Meta-analysis and Candidate Gene (s) for Anaerobic Germination Potential in Rice. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2025, 44, 3304–3317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Alvarez-Buylla, E.R.; Liljegren, S.J.; Pelaz, S.; Gold, S.E.; Burgeff, C.; Ditta, G.S.; Vergara-Silva, F.; Yanofsky, M.F. MADS-box gene evolution beyond flowers: Expression in pollen, endosperm, guard cells, roots and trichomes. Plant J. 2000, 24, 457–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Becker, A.; Theißen, G. The major clades of MADS-box genes and their role in the development and evolution of flowering plants. Mol. Phylogenetics Evol. 2003, 29, 464–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Nam, J.; Kim, J.; Lee, S.; An, G.; Ma, H.; Nei, M. Type I MADS-box genes have experienced faster birth-and-death evolution than type II MADS-box genes in angiosperms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 1910–1915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Lee, S.; Woo, Y.-M.; Ryu, S.-I.; Shin, Y.-D.; Kim, W.T.; Park, K.Y.; Lee, I.-J.; An, G. Further characterization of a rice AGL12 group MADS-box gene, OsMADS26. Plant Physiol. 2008, 147, 156–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ugalde, J.M. Every breath you don’t take, I’ll be helping you: Ethylene promotes hypoxia tolerance. Plant Physiol. 2022, 190, 1085–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Li, Z.; Wang, Q.; Pan, J.; Liu, W. Functional analysis of height regulation of cyptochrome P450 gene OsDWARF48 in rice. Shandong Agri Sci 2018, 50, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  59. Tang, C.; Bai, D.; Wang, X.; Dou, G.; Lv, J.; Bao, Y.; Wang, N.; Yu, L.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, J. Identification of Candidate Genes for Hypoxia Tolerance in Rice by Genome-Wide Association Analysis and Transcriptome Sequencing. Rice 2025, 18, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Chen, J.; Li, Q.; Guo, J.; Li, Z.; Huang, Z.; Ding, Q.; Miao, J.; Zhang, C.; Pu, S.; Li, J. Multi-omics analysis reveals insights into hypoxia-tolerant rice growth and identifies the 1-Cys peroxiredoxin B-like protease. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 312, 143953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Sun, B.; Meng, W.; Yin, W.; Niu, M.; Liu, D.; Liu, J.; Zhang, X.; Dong, N.; Yang, Y.; Li, X. Vital contribution of brassinosteroids to hypoxia-stimulated coleoptile elongation in submerged rice. Crop J. 2024, 12, 1379–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hartman, S.; Liu, Z.; Van Veen, H.; Vicente, J.; Reinen, E.; Martopawiro, S.; Zhang, H.; Van Dongen, N.; Bosman, F.; Bassel, G.W. Ethylene-mediated nitric oxide depletion pre-adapts plants to hypoxia stress. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 4020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Loreti, E.; Perata, P. ERFVII transcription factors and their role in the adaptation to hypoxia in Arabidopsis and crops. Front. Genet. 2023, 14, 1213839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Loreti, E.; Valeri, M.C.; Novi, G.; Perata, P. Gene regulation and survival under hypoxia requires starch availability and metabolism. Plant Physiol. 2018, 176, 1286–1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Locke, A.M.; Barding Jr, G.A.; Sathnur, S.; Larive, C.K.; Bailey-Serres, J. Rice SUB1A constrains remodelling of the transcriptome and metabolome during submergence to facilitate post-submergence recovery. Plant Cell Environ. 2018, 41, 721–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Bui, L.T.; Giuntoli, B.; Kosmacz, M.; Parlanti, S.; Licausi, F. Constitutively expressed ERF-VII transcription factors redundantly activate the core anaerobic response in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Sci. 2015, 236, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Papdi, C.; Pérez-Salamó, I.; Joseph, M.P.; Giuntoli, B.; Bögre, L.; Koncz, C.; Szabados, L. The low oxygen, oxidative and osmotic stress responses synergistically act through the ethylene response factor VII genes RAP 2.12, RAP 2.2 and RAP 2.3. Plant J. 2015, 82, 772–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Gasch, P.; Fundinger, M.; Müller, J.T.; Lee, T.; Bailey-Serres, J.; Mustroph, A. Redundant ERF-VII transcription factors bind to an evolutionarily conserved cis-motif to regulate hypoxia-responsive gene expression in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2016, 28, 160–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Mustroph, A.; Zanetti, M.E.; Jang, C.J.; Holtan, H.E.; Repetti, P.P.; Galbraith, D.W.; Girke, T.; Bailey-Serres, J. Profiling translatomes of discrete cell populations resolves altered cellular priorities during hypoxia in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 18843–18848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Perata, P.; Alpi, A. Plant responses to anaerobiosis. Plant Sci. 1993, 93, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Park, J.R.; Yang, W.T.; Kim, D.H.; Kim, K.M. Identification of a novel gene, osbht, in response to high temperature tolerance at booting stage in rice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Asif, S.; Kim, E.-G.; Jang, Y.-H.; Jan, R.; Kim, N.; Asaf, S.; Farooq, M.; Kim, K.-M. Identification of the OsCML4 Gene in Rice Related to Salt Stress Using QTL Analysis. Plants 2022, 11, 2467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Sarra, E.; Jihène, J.; Samira, S.-A. Physiological responses of Medicago truncatula growth under prolonged hypoxia stress. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2015, 10, 3073–3079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kim, N.; Jan, R.; Park, J.-R.; Asif, S.; Zhao, D.-D.; Kim, E.-G.; Jang, Y.-H.; Eom, G.-H.; Lee, G.-S.; Kim, K.-M. QTL mapping and candidate gene analysis for seed germination response to low temperature in Rice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 7379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Zhao, D.-D.; Jang, Y.-H.; Kim, E.-G.; Park, J.-R.; Jan, R.; Asaf, S.; Asif, S.; Farooq, M.; Chung, H.; Kang, D.-J. Identification of a Major Locus for Lodging Resistance to Typhoons Using QTL Analysis in Rice. Plants 2023, 12, 449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. McCough, S.R.; Doerge, R.W. QTL mapping in rice. Trends Genet. 1995, 11, 482–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Zhao, D.-D.; Jang, Y.-H.; Farooq, M.; Park, J.-R.; Kim, E.-G.; Du, X.-X.; Jan, R.; Kim, K.-H.; Lee, S.I.; Lee, G.-S. Identification of a major QTL and validation of related genes for tiller angle in rice based on QTL analysis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 5192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Assessment of plant growth parameters and frequency distribution of shoot length, root length, and fresh weight in the CNDH population. (AC) Evaluation of shoot length, root length, and fresh weight. (DF) Frequency distribution analysis. Data are shown as the mean ± standard deviation. Different letters above the bars represent a significant difference (p < 0.05) as evaluated by Duncan’s multiple range test. CH: Cheongcheong; ND: Nagdong.
Figure 1. Assessment of plant growth parameters and frequency distribution of shoot length, root length, and fresh weight in the CNDH population. (AC) Evaluation of shoot length, root length, and fresh weight. (DF) Frequency distribution analysis. Data are shown as the mean ± standard deviation. Different letters above the bars represent a significant difference (p < 0.05) as evaluated by Duncan’s multiple range test. CH: Cheongcheong; ND: Nagdong.
Ijms 26 10420 g001
Figure 2. Statistical analysis of shoot length, root length, and fresh weight in the CNDH population. (A) Correlation analysis among the investigated traits. (B) Principal component analysis (PCA) biplot regarding the three examined traits. ** indicates that the correlation is significant at the 0.01 level, while * correlation is significant at the 0.05 level. SL: shoot length; RL: root length; FW: fresh weight.
Figure 2. Statistical analysis of shoot length, root length, and fresh weight in the CNDH population. (A) Correlation analysis among the investigated traits. (B) Principal component analysis (PCA) biplot regarding the three examined traits. ** indicates that the correlation is significant at the 0.01 level, while * correlation is significant at the 0.05 level. SL: shoot length; RL: root length; FW: fresh weight.
Ijms 26 10420 g002
Figure 3. QTL mapping associated with hypoxia in the CNDH population. The QTLs were detected in RM264–RM23314, RM25128–RM25036, and RM12339–RM12532, on chromosomes 8, 10, and 2, respectively. SL: shoot length; FW: fresh weight.
Figure 3. QTL mapping associated with hypoxia in the CNDH population. The QTLs were detected in RM264–RM23314, RM25128–RM25036, and RM12339–RM12532, on chromosomes 8, 10, and 2, respectively. SL: shoot length; FW: fresh weight.
Ijms 26 10420 g003
Figure 4. QTL analysis and physical mapping of hypoxia-related genes. Hypoxia-related genes corresponding to biosynthetic process, molecular function, protein binding, response to stress, and signal transduction were identified in RM264–RM23314, RM25128–RM25036, and RM12339–RM12532 on chromosomes 8, 10, and 2, respectively. Among them, OsMADS23q8 was screened.
Figure 4. QTL analysis and physical mapping of hypoxia-related genes. Hypoxia-related genes corresponding to biosynthetic process, molecular function, protein binding, response to stress, and signal transduction were identified in RM264–RM23314, RM25128–RM25036, and RM12339–RM12532 on chromosomes 8, 10, and 2, respectively. Among them, OsMADS23q8 was screened.
Ijms 26 10420 g004
Figure 5. Clustering of candidate genes related to hypoxia. (A) A phylogenetic tree was constructed using the genetic distances of each candidate gene, which were divided into five groups and further into subgroups. (B) Venn diagram of the candidate genes related to hypoxia. G: gene expression and regulation; M: metabolism and enzymatic activity; P: protein processing, degradation, and modification; T: transport and signal transduction; S: growth, development, and stress response.
Figure 5. Clustering of candidate genes related to hypoxia. (A) A phylogenetic tree was constructed using the genetic distances of each candidate gene, which were divided into five groups and further into subgroups. (B) Venn diagram of the candidate genes related to hypoxia. G: gene expression and regulation; M: metabolism and enzymatic activity; P: protein processing, degradation, and modification; T: transport and signal transduction; S: growth, development, and stress response.
Ijms 26 10420 g005
Figure 6. Analysis of the relative expression level of genes related to hypoxia based on QTL analysis. Data are shown as the mean ± standard deviation, and asterisks show a significant difference (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01) following two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni test analysis. Pink bar: control; green bar: hypoxia treatment. CH: Cheongcheong; ND: Nagdong; resistant cell lines: CNDH13, CNDH35, and CNDH91; susceptible cell lines: CNDH14-2, CNDH43, and CNDH50-1.
Figure 6. Analysis of the relative expression level of genes related to hypoxia based on QTL analysis. Data are shown as the mean ± standard deviation, and asterisks show a significant difference (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01) following two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni test analysis. Pink bar: control; green bar: hypoxia treatment. CH: Cheongcheong; ND: Nagdong; resistant cell lines: CNDH13, CNDH35, and CNDH91; susceptible cell lines: CNDH14-2, CNDH43, and CNDH50-1.
Ijms 26 10420 g006
Figure 7. OsMADS23q8 sequence analysis. (A) Multiple sequence alignment of OsMADS23q8. A high similarity is illustrated among Oryza sativa, Oryza brachyantha, Oryza glaberrima, Panicum hallii, Phragmites australis, Sorghum bicolor, and Zea mays. (B) The phylogenetic tree was used to investigate OsMADS23q8 and the homologous gene. (C) OsMADS23q8 interacts with MPK2, MPK16, MPK4, MPK8, MPK15, MPK11, MPK6, MPK5, MPK13, and Q0DBX9_ORYSJ.
Figure 7. OsMADS23q8 sequence analysis. (A) Multiple sequence alignment of OsMADS23q8. A high similarity is illustrated among Oryza sativa, Oryza brachyantha, Oryza glaberrima, Panicum hallii, Phragmites australis, Sorghum bicolor, and Zea mays. (B) The phylogenetic tree was used to investigate OsMADS23q8 and the homologous gene. (C) OsMADS23q8 interacts with MPK2, MPK16, MPK4, MPK8, MPK15, MPK11, MPK6, MPK5, MPK13, and Q0DBX9_ORYSJ.
Ijms 26 10420 g007
Table 1. QTLs associated with hypoxia in the CNDH population.
Table 1. QTLs associated with hypoxia in the CNDH population.
TraitsQTLsChrInterval Markers zLODAdditive Effect yR2 xIncreasing Effects w
Shoot length (cm)qSL-88RM264–RM233143.024.240.34Cheong
Cheong
qSL-1010RM25128–RM250365.036.390.28Cheong
cheong
Fresh weight (mg)qFW-22RM12339–RM125323.60−0.120.28Nagdong
SL: shoot length; FW: fresh weight. z The markers in the significance threshold. y The positive values indicate the contribution from the mother plant. x The phenotypic variation. w The source of the allele generating an increase in assessed traits.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, N.; Jan, R.; Asif, S.; Asaf, S.; Khan, Z.; Kim, K.-M. Identification of Quantitative Trait Loci and Candidate Genes Involved in Rice Seedling Growth Under Hypoxic Stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 10420. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262110420

AMA Style

Kim N, Jan R, Asif S, Asaf S, Khan Z, Kim K-M. Identification of Quantitative Trait Loci and Candidate Genes Involved in Rice Seedling Growth Under Hypoxic Stress. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26(21):10420. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262110420

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Nari, Rahmatullah Jan, Saleem Asif, Sajjad Asaf, Zakirullah Khan, and Kyung-Min Kim. 2025. "Identification of Quantitative Trait Loci and Candidate Genes Involved in Rice Seedling Growth Under Hypoxic Stress" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 21: 10420. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262110420

APA Style

Kim, N., Jan, R., Asif, S., Asaf, S., Khan, Z., & Kim, K.-M. (2025). Identification of Quantitative Trait Loci and Candidate Genes Involved in Rice Seedling Growth Under Hypoxic Stress. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(21), 10420. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262110420

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop