You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Review
  • Open Access

9 October 2022

The Involvement of Smooth Muscle, Striated Muscle, and the Myocardium in Scleroderma: A Review

,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
and
1
Department of Rheumatology and Physiotherapy, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 16 University Street, 700115 Iasi, Romania
2
Department of Pharmacology, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 16 University Street, 700115 Iasi, Romania
3
Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 16 Universitatii Street, 700115 Iasi, Romania
4
Department of Psychiatry, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 16 University Street, 700115 Iasi, Romania
This article belongs to the Special Issue From Pathogenesis to Treatment—New Perspectives in Rheumatology

Abstract

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a complex autoimmune disease characterized by heterogeneous changes involving numerous organs and systems. The currently available data indicate that muscle injury (both smooth and striated muscles) is widespread and leads to significant morbidity, either directly or indirectly. From the consequences of smooth muscle involvement in the tunica media of blood vessels or at the level of the digestive tract, to skeletal myopathy (which may be interpreted strictly in the context of SSc, or as an overlap with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies), muscular injury in scleroderma translates to a number of notable clinical manifestations. Heart involvement in SSc is heterogenous depending on the definition used in the various studies. The majority of SSc patients experience a silent form of cardiac disease. The present review summarizes certain important features of myocardial, as well as smooth and skeletal muscle involvement in SSc. Further research is needed to fully describe and understand the pathogenic pathways and the implications of muscle involvement in scleroderma.

1. Introduction

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a connective tissue disease defined by a complex pathogenesis that includes vascular damage, immune system impairment, and fibrosis of the skin and internal organs [,]. The two main subsets of the disease (the limited cutaneous SSc–lcSSc, and diffuse cutaneous SSc–dcSSc) share numerous features, yet differ in terms of prognosis, with the diffuse form being associated with a higher risk of morbidity and mortality [,,,]. The most widely studied clinical changes of the disease include Raynaud’s phenomenon, digital ulcers, cardiopulmonary and kidney involvement, and digestive manifestations [,,].
Muscle involvement in scleroderma is complex and affects both smooth muscle (such as vascular and digestive smooth muscle) and skeletal muscle []. In recent years, the knowledge of the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying the heterogeneous involvement of the smooth muscle has considerably improved. The new methods of analyzing smooth muscle cells from the vascular wall or gastrointestinal tract have facilitated a better understanding of the clinical aspects [,,]. Regarding skeletal muscle involvement, it has been shown that in SSc it is represented either by myositis, or by non-inflammatory myopathy, both being important debilitating factors for SSc patients [,].
The pathogenesis and implications of smooth and striated muscle involvement in scleroderma remains poorly studied compared with other types of organ involvement [,]. The present review summarizes certain important features of smooth muscle, skeletal muscle, and myocardial involvement in SSc.
The search of the published data was performed on the EMBASE, EBSCO and PubMed databases, combining the following terms: “systemic sclerosis” or “scleroderma” with “smooth muscle”, “skeletal muscle”, “gastric wall”, “intestinal wall”, “muscle biopsy”, “myopathy”, “myositis”, “anti-PM-Scl antibodies”, “scleromyositis”, “sarcopenia”, “endomyocardial biopsy”, and “cardiac magnetic resonance”.

2. Smooth Muscle Involvement

2.1. Vascular Smooth Muscle

SSc is defined by a widespread vasculopathy existing before the onset of tissue fibrosis [,,]. It is one of the main pathogenic features involved in the development of Raynaud’s phenomenon, digital ulcers, pulmonary arterial hypertension, and scleroderma renal crisis [,,]. The failure to repair the local vascular injury leads to a chaotic deposition of extracellular matrix []. The progressive tissue fibrosis that follows the microvascular impairment involves the appearance of profibrotic myofibroblasts []. Myofibroblasts have contractile properties and originate from the vascular endothelial cells through an endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EndoMT), a process that is triggered by molecules such as TGF-β (transforming growth factor β), ET-1 (endothelin-1), IL1-β (interleukin 1-β), TNF-α (tumor necrosis factor-α), and other pro-inflammatory cytokines []. These unique cells are characterized by particular functions and immunophenotypic aspects: a reduction in their endothelial-specific indicators and the gain of myofibroblast-specific products such as α-SMA [,,]. Therefore, EndoMT determines an aberrant architecture of the microvascular network, with capillary loss and dermal fibrosis [,]. Furthermore, the EndoMT process is not exclusively a skin process, as it has also been detected in the lungs, gastrointestinal wall, myocardium, and kidneys [,,].
The vascular tunica media contains smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) that regulate the blood vessel tone and pressure [,]. Fully differentiated VSMCs are characterized by a contractile phenotype and the expression of normal contractile proteins, maintaining a quiescent form []. However, as a response to specific stimuli (environmental, inflammatory, growth, or mechanical factors) they may switch to a synthetic phenotype, developing into proliferative/migratory cells and extracellular matrix component (ECM) producers []. During this change, the expression of α-SMA and smooth muscle myosin heavy chain is downregulated, while other markers are newly acquired (non-muscle myosin heavy-chain isoform-B, cellular retinol-binding protein-1, platelet-derived growth factor-A, collagen type I, and others) []. This transformation was described as responsible for the development of atherosclerosis or systemic hypertension [,,]. In SSc, this mechanism is present as well, contributing to the extensive tissue fibrosis that follows the initial vasculopathy [].
Altorok et al. described a novel method for the isolation of VSMCs from the punch-skin biopsy. The authors investigated six subjects, three with late dcSSc and three healthy controls, and observed an increased proliferation rate, with higher metabolic activity, resistance to apoptosis, and longer viability of VSMCs from SSc patients compared with the control group. Therefore, the altered VSMCs determine uncontrolled vascular tone, and intimal and media proliferation, finally leading to subsequent fibrosis [].
It has been stated that Th17 (T helper 17) cells are involved in the pathogenesis of SSc []. In addition, a study reported the proliferative role of IL-17A (interleukin 17A) on dermal VSMCs in SSc, causing increased collagen synthesis and secretion []. Following this statement, studies were carried out regarding the inhibition of IL-17A as a potential therapeutic target in SSc, but more research is needed to elucidate the extent to which IL-17 blockade could influence SSc manifestations [,].
The mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs)—the main source of VSMCs—possess unique alterations in their differentiation process as a response to specific growth factors (connective tissue growth factor, CTGF; basic fibroblast growth factor, b-FGF; platelet derived growth factor BB, PDGF-BB; and transforming growth factor β1, TGF-β1). An in vitro study showed that the MSCs collected from SSc patients differentiated mainly into myofibroblasts, with uncontrolled contractile VSMCs conversion. Before adding the growth factors, the MSCs from healthy controls and SSc patients had a comparable phenotype with irregular shapes and α-SMA. In response to CTGF, the SSc-MSCs failed to differentiate into normal contractile VSMCs, while b-FGF promoted the synthetic phenotype. Moreover, in SSc, TGF-β1 generated more myofibroblast differentiation compared with healthy controls [].
Notably, pulmonary arterial hypertension is one of the most severe and potentially life-threatening complications in SSc [,]. The VSMCs’ activity also plays an important role in the development of pulmonary arterial hypertension through the same conversion from a contractile phenotype to a synthetic one [,]. The presence of reactive oxygen species at the level of pulmonary arterial muscle cells may favor collagen synthesis. After exposure to the sera from patients with SSc-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension, pulmonary arterial smooth muscle cells exhibited an oxidative stress-related enhancement in collagen production [,]. Moreover, the level of leukotriene B4 was found to increase in patients with SSc and pulmonary arterial hypertension []. The presence of leukotriene B4 was shown to determine hypertrophy and increased the proliferation of the pulmonary arterioles’ smooth muscle cells [].
The pulmonary vascular smooth muscle impairment is associated with the dysregulation of transcription factors such as Krűppel-like factor 5 (KLF5). These factors play a key role in the proliferation and apoptosis of VSMCs in pulmonary hypertension []. Complex autoimmune and inflammatory mechanisms were investigated as part of the pulmonary arterial hypertension pathogenesis, along with autoantibody production and genetic abnormalities [,,]. However, the relationship between inflammation, the immune system and the pulmonary wall remains a matter of further investigation.
The VSMCs’ dysfunction and the differentiation from fibroblast to myofibroblast involves the PDGFR (platelet-derived growth factor receptor) molecular pathway []. A recent study indicated the decisive role of macrophage-derived PDGF-B in the pathological development of the smooth muscle cells []. High levels of PDGF, PDGFR-β, and anti-PDGFR-α antibodies were also identified in SSc patients’ skin [,]. A study published in 2017 evaluated the in vitro effects of these molecules on human smooth muscle cells of 11 SSc patients. After exposing the smooth muscle cells to anti-PDGFR-α antibodies from SSc patients’ sera, the smooth muscle cells converted into a synthetic phenotype, with all the aforementioned properties [,].
When combined with IgG from SSc patients’ sera, VSMCs were shown to exhibit a higher growth index and develop a profibrotic response through the activation of various protein kinases that adjust the vascular remodeling process []. Moreover, studies reported the presence of VSMC antibodies in SSc patients’ sera, irrespective of pulmonary hypertension. These antibodies alter VSMCs’ contraction and are directed against STIP1 (stress-induced phosphoprotein 1) and α-enolase [].

2.2. Digestive Smooth Muscle

2.2.1. Esophageal Involvement

Some of the most common clinical features in SSc patients result from esophageal involvement, which leads to dysphagia and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) [,]. Esophageal dysfunction may appear in approximately 90% of SSc patients [,,]. In a very early stage, the clinical symptoms may be absent, although esophageal involvement can be present at a histological level [,]. Smooth muscle atrophy and fibrosis play an important role in the appearance of esophageal dismotility. This results in reduced pressure and the absence of coordination in the lower esophageal sphincter, together with an inefficient peristaltic pump [,]. In the beginning, vasculopathy may generate irreversible muscle and nerve lesions. Similar to Raynaud’s phenomenon, the vasospasm decreases the muscle blood supply, leading to motor impairment, and platelet and endothelin activation as a response to ischemia [,]. As a consequence, there is a disproportionate extracellular matrix formation and aberrant collagen deposition [,].
A case–control study evaluated the esophageal biopsy samples of 74 patients with SSc post-mortem. The authors found important histological findings in the smooth muscle layer in over 90% of the samples. Atrophic areas observed in the circular smooth muscle layer were present in all subjects. In 66% of the samples, atrophic modifications in the longitudinal layer were also present. Moreover, the atrophy was more severe in the circular layer, although there was no correlation between the disease duration and the degree of atrophy. In some cases with diffuse esophagitis, inflammatory cells were also present in the muscular layer of the esophagus [].
Another study that included the endoscopic and endosonographic examination of the esophagus in 25 patients with SSc observed a thicker esophageal wall compared with healthy controls. Moreover, the esophageal muscularis layer and submucosa were thicker in SSc patients that suffered from dysphagia. The study did not identify any correlation between disease duration and the structure and width of the esophageal wall [].
Taroni et al. published a histological and molecular overview of the esophageal changes in scleroderma. The authors identified three molecular subsets: inflammatory, proliferative, and non-inflammatory signatures. They are different from the classical clinical subtypes and do not depend on disease duration, antibodies, skin score, or collagen deposition. The study suggested the possibility of an inflammatory mechanism as part of the esophageal involvement, since interferon-induced proteins and inflammasomes were detected in the inflammatory subset [].

2.2.2. Gastric Involvement

Gastric involvement appears in approximately 50% of patients with scleroderma [] and is characterized by the presence of GAVE (gastric antral vascular ectasia), gastric hypomotility, and gastroparesis. The most common symptoms of gastric involvement include early satiety, bloating, regurgitation, nausea, vomiting, eructation, and abdominal pain []. Gastric dysmotility leads to prolonged gastric emptying and is reflected by altered myoelectric activity []. The histological modifications of the gastric wall were previously described in various studies (Table 1).
Table 1. Histological aspects of the gastric wall in systemic sclerosis.

2.2.3. Lower Digestive Tract Involvement

Small bowel involvement includes dysmotility, leading to chronic pseudo-obstruction or small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO). Patients often present with abdominal distention, nausea, diarrhea, bloating, abdominal pain, and other symptoms due to malabsorption [,,]. Colonic involvement can be suggested by the presence of alternating constipation with diarrhea, fecal incontinence, steatorrhea, or such potentially life-threatening complications as colonic volvulus or perforation [,].
Several studies showed there is a progressive fibrosis of the bowel smooth muscle and vasculopathy that promotes bacterial overgrowth []. Moreover, there is a defective contractile function, with reduced power and decreased velocity of the smooth muscle cells that combines with the stiffness of the tissue []. There is also an increased collagen deposition in the mucosa, submucosa and muscularis, especially in the large intestine. The reduced colonic contractility as a response to a cholinergic agonist was demonstrated using a scleroderma mouse model [].
A recent study investigated the histological aspect of the intestines in SSc on autopsy segments of the small bowel and colon, which were compared with material from healthy controls. Vascular impairment was more often present in SSc patients, especially in the small bowel. The enteric nervous system was altered, especially in the colon, where neuronal density was decreased in the myenteric plexus, but not in the muscularis propria. The presence of α-SMA (α-smooth muscle actin) protein was no different between SSc and healthy controls. However, more inclusion bodies, an both focal and generalized fibrosis were more often present in the circular layers of SSc patients. Moreover, focal fibrosis was found with a greater frequency in the colon, as well as in the longitudinal layers [].
Internal anal sphincter involvement may also be present due to neuropathy or myopathy, although it is usually not reported by patients. Studies show that the internal sphincter’s function is altered, with severe hypotonia due to tissue fibrosis and excessive collagen deposition [,,].

3. Skeletal Muscle Involvement

Skeletal involvement in SSc can range from unspecific muscle involvement without muscular inflammation to real inflammatory myositis. However, there is a “grey” area with patients who are hard to classify as having one or the other.
Patients may experience non-progressive non-inflammatory myopathy as a consequence of digestive disturbance, malnutrition, a sedentary lifestyle, or contractures of fibrotic skin. In other cases, it appears as an overlapping syndrome with inflammatory myopathy when patients meet the classification criteria for both diseases [,,]. SSc-associated myopathy was also described when patients meeting the SSc classification criteria developed muscle weakness, myalgia, elevated CK (creatin-kinase), abnormal EMG (electromyography), MRI (magnetic resonance imaging), or muscle biopsy []. Another term cited in the literature is scleromyositis, referring to patients with anti-PM/Scl autoantibodies and Raynaud’s phenomenon, scleroderma skin changes, arthralgias/arthritis, myalgia/myositis, interstitial lung disease, and/or calcinosis, with increased mortality due to cardiopulmonary involvement []. Patients often have marked peripheral muscle weakness in the upper and lower limbs, with reduced range of motion in the shoulders, reduced strength in the lower limbs, and physical disability [,].
Moreover, SSc may be associated with idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM). Maundrell et al. reported that myositis antibodies and myositis-specific histological features were more often present in the SSc-IIM group compared with IIM alone, suggesting a possible connection between the two diseases [].

3.1. Systemic Sclerosis and Inflammatory Myopathy

The prevalence of skeletal myopathy varies between 5 and 96%, with differences between the geographic areas []. This variation depends also on the criteria that each study used in defining muscle involvement. A recent study showed that SSc patients with a history of exposure to environmental factors, especially silica, had a higher frequency of myopathy []. In some cases, the SSc/polymyositis overlap syndrome may not be fully differentiated from SSc-associated myopathy [,,]. Currently, whether the presence of inflammatory skeletal muscle changes should be regarded primarily as a disease-related manifestation or rather as a sign of overlap with IIM remains a matter of debate.
The recognition of muscle involvement in SSc can be based on symptoms, clinical signs, and abnormal elevated values of accessible laboratory tests such as serum CK or aldolase, and should represent a priority in the clinical follow-up, as it is associated with higher mortality and poor quality of life [,,]. The clinical presentation shares symptoms with polymyositis or dermatomyositis, the most frequently reported being myalgia, muscle weakness, and tenderness []. The skeletal muscle involvement is usually symmetric in the proximal limbs. Distal weakness can also be present, although it is difficult to differentiate from the consequences of severe skin sclerosis []. Although rare, other muscles may also be involved, such as the cervical muscles, as a manifestation of SSc–IIM overlap syndrome [,]. Moreover, skeletal and cardiac involvement are associated, patients with myopathy being at risk for congestive heart failure [].
Regarding the laboratory findings in myopathy, CK and aldolase levels have been studied, the latter having the highest predictive value [,]. However, these are sometimes unreliable markers; thus, other examinations are required such as EMG, MRI, or muscle biopsy []. EMG is usually altered, with modifications similar to those present in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies []. Currently, whole-body MRI is a more common method of investigation as it is non-invasive and can detect the presence of myositis, despite the absence of standard scoring systems. In a cohort of 34 SSc patients, muscle edema was present in 13 of the subjects, of which only 2 had myopathy symptoms, suggesting the importance of imaging to fully evaluate these patients, regardless of the presence of symptoms. Moreover, it was associated with male gender and the diffuse cutaneous phenotype, although no relationship was found between skeletal and cardiac muscle involvement []. Furthermore, MRI can be used to evaluate the presence of diffuse fibrosis in the peripheral muscles using extracellular volume determination []. Certain key clinical and laboratory findings from studies of skeletal muscle involvement in SSc patients are described in Table 2.
Table 2. Skeletal muscle involvement in SSc as reported by previous studies: clinical and laboratory findings.
In SSc-associated skeletal myopathy, the histological changes described to date were similar to (or suggestive of) polymyositis, dermatomyositis, immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy, fibrosing myopathy, or non-specific myositis (Table 3) []. Lefebvre et al. performed a scoping review including all major studies published between 1955 and 2019 that provided information on the histological features in patients with SSc and myositis. They reviewed 77 studies and summarized 559 muscle biopsies. Inflammatory infiltrates, composed mostly of T cells, were the most prevalent finding in 57% of the biopsies, 49% of them being endomysial, 42% perimysial, and 41% perivascular. In 48% of the biopsies, myofiber atrophy was described, mostly perifascicular. Necrosis of the muscle fibers was reported in 56% of the biopsies and in 41% regenerative fibers were present. The presented data suggest that the predominant features are not specific for SSc-myositis patients, although up to a third of patients present acute neurogenic atrophy and fibrosis []. Furthermore, fibrosis was associated with younger age of SSc onset, diffuse cutaneous form, African American population, lower forced vital capacity, positivity for anti-Scl-70 and U3-RNP antibodies, and increased mortality compared with patients with inflammatory myopathy [].
A recent study reported a specific histological pattern called “minimal myositis with capillary pathology” (MMCP) present in a high percentage of patients with lcSSc. Usually, patients with MMCP have rare organ involvement, mild CK elevation, and mild disease activity, yet no association with SSc-specific antibodies [].
Table 3. Muscle biopsy patterns reported in patients with SSc and muscle involvement symptoms.
Table 3. Muscle biopsy patterns reported in patients with SSc and muscle involvement symptoms.
AuthorPatientsFindings
Paik et al. []The study included a database of 2830 patients, from which 42 had muscle weakness and underwent a muscle biopsy. Necrosis and inflammation were the most prevalent findings, accounting for 67% and 48%, respectively. Fibrosis was present in 33% of the biopsies. A marker for acute neurogenic atrophy (esterase positivity of angular atrophic fibers) was described in 48% of the muscle biopsies. The most common patterns found were non-specific myositis in 38.5% of the cases and necrotizing myopathy in 21.4% of the biopsies.
Corallo et al. []The study included 35 patients with clinical, biological, and EMG exams of muscle involvement. The most common patterns found included fibrosis in 81% of cases and microangiopathy in 92% of the biopsies. In 85% of cases there was no inflammatory infiltrate. They also described loss in small endomysial vessels and complement deposition in endomysial capillaries.
Siegert et al. []From the 367-patient cohort, 18 patients underwent a muscle biopsy due to the presence of muscle involvement symptoms. In 12 biopsies, a unique pattern was described as “minimal myositis with capillary pathology”, characterized as a mild myositis with rare histopathological alterations. The rest of the biopsies were very different: one had typical anti-synthetase syndrome alterations and five were non-specific.
From the serology markers, it can be seen that anti-PM/Scl antibodies were associated with a distinct phenotype, muscle involvement being reported more frequently in PM/Scl-positive patients [,]. In SSc, the prevalence of anti-PM/Scl antibodies varies between 3 and 17.5% as highlighted in Table 4 [,]. They are directed against two main autoantigenic proteins, PM/Scl-75 and PM/Scl-100. These antibodies are not specific for SSc as they can be found in polymyositis, dermatomyositis, and SSc-polymyositis overlap syndrome [,]. Patients with anti-PM/Scl antibodies developed muscle weakness and interstitial lung disease as the disease progressed. Compared with patients with the antisynthetase syndrome, dermatomyositis, and immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy, they have been more often diagnosed with the following in the order of their prevalence: “mechanic’s hands”, Raynaud’s phenomenon, sclerodactyly, telangiectasias, esophageal reflux disease, subcutaneous edema, puffy hands, and calcinosis []. Moreover, positivity for these antibodies was correlated with pulmonary fibrotic patterns and cardiac complications [].
Table 4. Studies that tested the presence of anti-PM/Scl antibodies in SSc patients.
Scleromyositis is a term proposed for the SSc-IIM overlap syndrome, characterized by the presence of both classification criteria of SSc and myositis, using the 2013 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for SSc and the 2017 EULAR/ACR classification criteria for idiopathic inflammatory myopathies [,,]. It is also the most frequent, accounting for almost 44% of all other SSc overlap syndromes []. It is also the most frequent SSc overlap, accounting for almost 44% of all SSc overlap syndromes [].
A recent study that included 42 patients with scleromyositis hypothesized the possibility of distinct subsets of scleromyositis based on the autoantibody profile. The subjects were divided into three groups based on the presence of SSc-specific, SSc-overlap, or no SSc-related antibodies, where SSc-specific antibodies were considered anti-centromere, anti-topoisomerase-I, anti-RNA-polymerase-III, anti-Th/To, and anti-fibrillarin, and the antibodies indicative of SSc-overlap were anti-PM/Scl, anti-Ku, and anti-U1RNP antibodies. The authors found that skin thickening was absent in 50% of the SSc-overlap group and in 30% of the no SSc-related group. Proximal muscle weakness was present in more than 70% of all of the groups, while distal weakness was present in 57% of the SSc-overlap group and in 55% of the no SSc-related group. Moreover, head drop/bent spine, elevated CK levels and other overlap features such as Raynaud’s phenomenon, calcinosis, and arthritis were more frequent in scleromyositis.
Regarding histopathology features, perifascicular atrophy, necrosis, inflammation, and neurogenic changes were described in the SSc-overlap group []. Furthermore, in a Hungarian cohort, the genetic features HLA-DRB1 and DQA1 and dysphagia were more common in overlap patients, while some characteristics present at the onset of SSc, such as fever, subcutaneous calcinosis, heart involvement, and claw hand deformity, were correlated with pulmonary arterial hypertension in this group [,]. A group of authors also described a seronegative form of scleromyositis, with the absence of SSc-specific or SSc-overlap antibodies, and explored the non-ACR/EULAR features that led to a positive diagnosis of scleromyositis. The authors hypothesized that myositis might represent an early SSc manifestation since it was present in 55% of the subjects as the first non-Raynaud manifestation. Moreover, skin involvement was absent in almost half of the patients at the time of myositis diagnosis, while several features (Raynaud’s phenomenon, ANA, SSc pattern in capillaroscopy, and lower esophageal dysmotility) were established as possible indicators for a scleromyositis diagnosis [].

3.2. Sarcopenia

SSc patients have impaired muscle function associated with fatigue and disability that can be sometimes a consequence of a natural phenomenon called sarcopenia. Although it is mainly found in the older population, sarcopenia may also be described in certain chronic diseases, irrespective of age [,]. Several studies have proved that chronic inflammation is an important risk factor for sarcopenia. Systemic inflammation may significantly contribute to the appearance of sarcopenia in chronic immune-inflammatory diseases such as scleroderma [,]. Furthermore, SSc disturbs the patients’ physical status and nutrition, being a major risk factor for sarcopenia, especially in cases of longer disease duration [,]. The EWGSOP (European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People) proposed a definition of sarcopenia in 2010, as well as a revised definition and diagnosis criteria in 2019. In the latter version, low muscle strength indicates probable sarcopenia, low muscle quantity or quality confirms the diagnosis, and, if low physical performance is also present, sarcopenia is regarded as severe [].
The prevalence of sarcopenia in SSc varies between 15% and 53%, depending on the definition and the analyzed group of subjects. A number of studies use only the SMI (skeletal muscle index—a tool for the assessment of muscle mass), while others included an evaluation of muscle strength (the handgrip strength index), as described in Table 5 [,,,,,].
Table 5. The presence and clinical significance of sarcopenia in SSc patients.

4. Cardiac Muscle Involvement

Recent studies suggest that the risk of cardiovascular disease in SSc is higher compared with the general population []. Moreover, according to the EUSTAR database analysis, it accounts for 27% of the deaths []. Apart from the traditional cardiovascular risk factors, there are a series of other risk factors that are associated with the primary myocardial disease: male gender, advanced age, the diffuse form of SSc, muscle involvement, digital ulcers, rapid skin progression, and the presence of anti-topoisomerase I antibodies [,,]. Cardiac involvement in SSc is heterogenous depending on the definition used in the various studies, ranging between 80% when defined from the histopathological point of view, and 5% when defined from the clinical point of view [,]. The majority of SSc patients experience a silent form of cardiac disease [,].
Besides the myocardium, the pericardium, conduction system, and cardiac valves may also be involved []. The cardiac manifestations include a wide range of clinical possibilities, including myocardial fibrosis, ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunction, myocarditis, congestive heart failure, pericardial disease, arrhythmias, conduction defects, and microvascular dysfunction [,,].
The pathogenesis of cardiovascular involvement is very complex, beginning with microvascular and immune dysfunction. The cardiac Raynaud’s phenomenon and the collagen deposition that lead to hyperplasia of the intramural arteries cause intermittent ischemia. As a consequence, areas of necrosis develop that will be replaced by myocardial fibrosis [,,]. Patchy myocardial fibrosis is considered the hallmark of myocardial involvement in SSc. It is present in both ventricles and does not correlate with the distribution of coronary arteries [,]. Histopathological patterns of the myocardium involvement in SSc are described in detail in Table 6, from the first reported autopsies to the most recent endomyocardial biopsies.
Table 6. Histopathological studies performed on SSc patients’ myocardium.
For a proper diagnosis of myocardial involvement in SSc, various investigations are being used to assess cardiac injury, such as cardiac biomarkers, electrocardiography, transthoracic echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), nuclear techniques, or endomyocardial biopsy [,,]. CMR is one of the most accurate non-invasive and non-irradiating methods used to evaluate myocardial inflammation and fibrosis, being able to identify cardiac disease through specific indexes and measurements. High T2 signal values are used to diagnose myocarditis, indicating myocardial edema. LGE (late gadolinium enhancement) measures focal fibrosis and is frequently found in SSc patients in a nonischemic pattern. Moreover, T1 mapping and ECV (mean extracellular volume) quantification are a way of measuring the relaxation and expansion of the myocardial tissue with values that are significantly higher in SSc []. Studies that evaluated SSc patients using CMR are described in detail in Table 7.
Table 7. Recent studies that used cardiac magnetic resonance to evaluate systemic sclerosis patients.

5. Conclusions

The muscle involvement in SSc includes, to a variable extent, both smooth and skeletal muscle. The altered VSMCs acquire higher metabolic and proliferative rates, leading to important remodeling of the vessel wall. Very few studies have managed to isolate VSMCs from SSc patients and describe the intimal and media proliferation together with the final fibrosis stage. This conversion is clinically translated into Raynaud’s phenomenon, digital ulcers, pulmonary arterial hypertension, and scleroderma renal crisis.
GI dysmotility develops through a staged process where different pathophysiological mechanisms overlap, leading to the clinical forms that the clinician sees. Progressive vasculopathy and myopathy, a neurological disorder of the neuromuscular junction, or the presence of antimyenteric antibodies appear to be the most common theories for the mechanism of GI dysfunction.
Skeletal involvement is often part of the onset symptoms of the disease, causing significant disability and low quality of life together with a poor prognosis. Regardless of the diagnosis method used (electromyography, MRI, elevated CK levels, or muscle biopsy), fatigue, muscle weakness, and myalgia are the most common symptoms. Furthermore, the impaired muscle function can lead to secondary sarcopenia.
Heart involvement in SSc is heterogenous depending on the definition used in the various studies. The majority of SSc patients experience a silent form of cardiac disease.
Systemic sclerosis is a complex autoimmune disease characterized by heterogeneous changes involving numerous organs and systems. The currently available data suggest that muscle injury (both smooth and striated muscles) is widespread and leads to a number of notable clinical manifestations. Nevertheless, further research is needed to fully describe and understand the pathogenic pathways and the implications of muscle involvement in scleroderma.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.R.; resources, C.R., M.C.B., I.B., A.M.B., A.C., L.A.M., P.R. and G.R.-Z.; writing—original draft preparation, I.B., A.M.B., A.C., L.A.M., P.R. and G.R.-Z.; writing—review and editing, C.R., A.S., I.B. and A.M.B.; supervision, E.R., M.C.B., C.R. and A.S.; project administration, E.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Denton, C.; Khanna, D. Systemic sclerosis. Lancet 2017, 390, 1685–1699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Varga, J.; Trojanowska, M.; Kuwana, M. Pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis: Recent insights of molecular and cellular mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities. J. Scleroderma Relat. Disord. 2017, 2, 137–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ferreli, C.; Gasparini, G.; Parodi, A.; Cozzani, E.; Rongioletti, F.; Atzori, L. Cutaneous Manifestations of Scleroderma and Scleroderma-Like Disorders: A Comprehensive Review. Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol. 2017, 53, 306–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Di Battista, M.; Barsotti, S.; Orlandi, M.; Lepri, G.; Codullo, V.; Della Rossa, A.; Guiducci, S.; Del Galdo, F. One year in review 2021: Systemic sclerosis. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2021, 39 (Suppl. 131), 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cutolo, M.; Soldano, S.; Smith, V. Pathophysiology of systemic sclerosis: Current understanding and new insights. Expert Rev. Clin. Immunol. 2019, 15, 753–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Asano, Y. The Pathogenesis of Systemic Sclerosis: An Understanding Based on a Common Pathologic Cascade across Multiple Organs and Additional Organ-Specific Pathologies. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 2687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Korman, B. Evolving insights into the cellular and molecular pathogenesis of fibrosis in systemic sclerosis. Transl. Res. 2019, 209, 77–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Truchetet, M.E.; Brembilla, N.C.; Chizzolini, C. Current Concepts on the Pathogenesis of Systemic Sclerosis. Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol. 2021, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Romano, E.; Rosa, I.; Fioretto, B.; Matucci-Cerinic, M.; Manetti, M. New Insights into Profibrotic Myofibroblast Formation in Systemic Sclerosis: When the Vascular Wall Becomes the Enemy. Life 2021, 11, 610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Trojanowska, M. Cellular and molecular aspects of vascular dysfunction in systemic sclerosis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2010, 6, 453–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sallam, H.; McNearney, T.A.; Chen, J.D.Z. Systematic review: Pathophysiology and management of gastrointestinal dysmotility in systemic sclerosis (scleroderma). Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2006, 23, 691–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Romano, E.; Rosa, I.; Fioretto, B.S.; Matucci-Cerinic, M.; Manetti, M. The Role of Pro-fibrotic Myofibroblasts in Systemic Sclerosis: From Origin to Therapeutic Targeting. Curr. Mol. Med. 2022, 22, 209–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Lóránd, V.; Czirják, L.; Minier, T. Musculoskeletal involvement in systemic sclerosis. Presse. Med. 2014, 43 Pt 2, e315–e328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Randone, S.B.; Guiducci, S.; Cerinic, M.M. Musculoskeletal involvement in systemic sclerosis. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Rheumatol. 2008, 22, 339–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Corallo, C.; Cutolo, M.; Volpi, N.; Franci, D.; Aglianó, M.; Montella, A.; Chirico, C.; Gonnelli, S.; Nuti, R.; Giordano, N. Histopathological findings in systemic sclerosis-related myopathy: Fibrosis and microangiopathy with lack of cellular inflammation. Ther. Adv. Musculoskelet. Dis. 2016, 9, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ranque, B.; Authier, F.; Berezne, A.; Guillevin, L.; Mouthon, L. Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Myopathy. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2007, 1108, 268–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jinnin, M. ‘Narrow-sense’ and ‘broad-sense’ vascular abnormalities of systemic sclerosis. Immunol. Med. 2020, 43, 107–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Maciejewska, M.; Sikora, M.; Maciejewski, C.; Alda-Malicka, R.; Czuwara, J.; Rudnicka, L. Raynaud’s Phenomenon with Focus on Systemic Sclerosis. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 2490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bruni, C.; Cuomo, G.; Rossi, F.W.; Praino, E.; Bellando-Randone, S. Kidney involvement in systemic sclerosis: From pathogenesis to treatment. J. Scleroderma Relat. Disord. 2018, 3, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. van Caam, A.; Vonk, M.; van den Hoogen, F.; van Lent, P.; van der Kraan, P. Unraveling SSc Pathophysiology; The Myofibroblast. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 2452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Manetti, M.; Romano, E.; Rosa, I.; Guiducci, S.; Bellando-Randone, S.; De Paulis, A.; Ibba-Manneschi, L.; Matucci-Cerinic, M. Endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition contributes to endothelial dysfunction and dermal fibrosis in systemic sclerosis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2017, 76, 924–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Di Benedetto, P.; Ruscitti, P.; Berardicurti, O.; Vomero, M.; Navarini, L.; Dolo, V.; Cipriani, P.; Giacomelli, R. Endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition in systemic sclerosis. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2021, 205, 12–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Rosa, I.; Romano, E.; Fioretto, B.S.; Manetti, M. The contribution of mesenchymal transitions to the pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis. Eur. J. Rheumatol. 2020, 7 (Suppl. 3), S157–S164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Manetti, M.; Neumann, E.; Milia, A.F.; Tarner, I.H.; Bechi, P.; Matucci-Cerinic, M.; Ibba-Manneschi, L.; Müller-Ladner, U. Severe fibrosis and increased expression of fibrogenic cytokines in the gastric wall of systemic sclerosis patients. Arthritis Care Res. 2007, 56, 3442–3447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jimenez, S.A.; Piera-Velazquez, S. Endothelial to mesenchymal transition (EndoMT) in the pathogenesis of Systemic Sclerosis-associated pulmonary fibrosis and pulmonary arterial hypertension. Myth or reality? Matrix Biol. 2016, 51, 26–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Wang, G.; Jacquet, L.; Karamariti, E.; Xu, Q. Origin and differentiation of vascular smooth muscle cells. J. Physiol. 2015, 593, 3013–3030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Shi, J.; Yang, Y.; Cheng, A.; Xu, G.; He, F. Metabolism of vascular smooth muscle cells in vascular diseases. Am. J. Physiol. Circ. Physiol. 2020, 319, H613–H631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lechartier, B.; Berrebeh, N.; Huertas, A.; Humbert, M.; Guignabert, C.; Tu, L. Phenotypic Diversity of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Implications for Therapy. Chest 2022, 161, 219–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Miano, J.M.; Fisher, E.A.; Majesky, M.W. Fate and State of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells in Atherosclerosis. Circulation 2021, 143, 2110–2116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sorokin, V.; Vickneson, K.; Kofidis, T.; Woo, C.C.; Lin, X.Y.; Foo, R.; Shanahan, C.M. Role of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Plasticity and Interactions in Vessel Wall Inflammation. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 599415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Altorok, N.; Nada, S.; Kahaleh, B. The isolation and characterization of systemic sclerosis vascular smooth muscle cells: Enhanced proliferation and apoptosis resistance. J. Scleroderma Relat. Disord. 2016, 1, 307–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bălănescu, P.; Bălănescu, E.; Bălănescu, A. IL-17 and Th17 cells in systemic sclerosis: A comprehensive review. Romanian J. Intern. Med. 2017, 55, 198–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Liu, M.; Yang, J.; Xing, X.; Cui, X.; Li, M. Interleukin-17A promotes functional activation of systemic sclerosis patient-derived dermal vascular smooth muscle cells by extracellular-regulated protein kinases signalling pathway. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2014, 16, 4223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  34. Liu, M.; Yang, J.; Li, M. Tanshinone IIA attenuates interleukin-17A-induced systemic sclerosis patient-derived dermal vascular smooth muscle cell activation via inhibition of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase signaling pathway. Clinics 2015, 70, 250–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Karatas, A.; Celik, C.; Oz, B.; Akar, Z.A.; Etem, E.O.; Dagli, A.F.; Koca, S.S. Secukinumab and metformin ameliorate dermal fibrosis by decreasing tissue interleukin-17 levels in bleomycin-induced dermal fibrosis. Int. J. Rheum. Dis. 2021, 24, 795–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hegner, B.; Schaub, T.; Catar, R.; Kusch, A.; Wagner, P.; Essin, K.; Lange, C.; Riemekasten, G.; Dragun, D. Intrinsic Deregulation of Vascular Smooth Muscle and Myofibroblast Differentiation in Mesenchymal Stromal Cells from Patients with Systemic Sclerosis. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0153101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jiang, Y.; Turk, M.A.; Pope, J.E. Factors associated with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in systemic sclerosis (SSc). Autoimmun. Rev. 2020, 19, 102602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Trojanowska, M. Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Scleroderma and Connective Tissue Disease: Potential Molecular and Cellular Targets. Adv. Pulm. Hypertens. 2017, 16, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kherbeck, N.; Tamby, M.C.; Bussone, G.; Dib, H.; Perros, F.; Humbert, M.; Mouthon, L. The Role of Inflammation and Autoimmunity in the Pathophysiology of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol. 2011, 44, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Boin, F.; Erre, G.L.; Posadino, A.M.; Cossu, A.; Giordo, R.; Spinetti, G.; Passiu, G.; Emanueli, C.; Pintus, G. Oxidative stress-dependent activation of collagen synthesis is induced in human pulmonary smooth muscle cells by sera from patients with scleroderma-associated pulmonary hypertension. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2014, 9, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Svegliati, S.; Amico, D.; Spadoni, T.; Fischetti, C.; Finke, D.; Moroncini, G.; Paolini, C.; Tonnini, C.; Grieco, A.; Rovinelli, M.; et al. Agonistic Anti-PDGF Receptor Autoantibodies from Patients with Systemic Sclerosis Impact Human Pulmonary Artery Smooth Muscle Cells Function In Vitro. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 75. [Google Scholar]
  42. Liang, M.; Lv, J.; Jiang, Z.; He, H.; Chen, C.; Xiong, Y.; Zhu, X.; Xue, Y.; Yu, Y.; Yang, S.; et al. Promotion of Myofibroblast Differentiation and Tissue Fibrosis by the Leukotriene B4-Leukotriene B4 Receptor Axis in Systemic Sclerosis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020, 72, 1013–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Qian, J.; Tian, W.; Jiang, X.; Tamosiuniene, R.; Sung, Y.K.; Shuffle, E.M.; Tu, A.B.; Valenzuela, A.; Jiang, S.; Zamanian, R.T.; et al. LTB4 activates pulmonary artery adventitial fibroblasts in pulmonary hypertension. Hypertension 2015, 66, 1227–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  44. Noda, S.; Asano, Y.; Nishimura, S.; Taniguchi, T.; Fujiu, K.; Manabe, I.; Nakamura, K.; Yamashita, T.; Saigusa, R.; Akamata, K.; et al. Simultaneous downregulation of KLF5 and Fli1 is a key feature underlying systemic sclerosis. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Shu, T.; Xing, Y.; Wang, J. Autoimmunity in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Evidence for Local Immunoglobulin Production. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2021, 8, 680109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Huertas, A.; Tu, L.; Humbert, M.; Guignabert, C. Chronic inflammation within the vascular wall in pulmonary arterial hypertension: More than a spectator. Cardiovasc. Res. 2020, 116, 885–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ntokou, A.; Dave, J.M.; Kauffman, A.C.; Sauler, M.; Ryu, C.; Hwa, J.; Herzog, E.L.; Singh, I.; Saltzman, W.M.; Greif, D.M. Macrophage-derived PDGF-B induces muscularization in murine and human pulmonary hypertension. JCI Insight 2021, 6, e139067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Trojanowska, M. Role of PDGF in fibrotic diseases and systemic sclerosis. Rheumatology 2008, 47 (Suppl. 5), v2–v4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Baroni, S.S.; Santillo, M.; Bevilacqua, F.; Luchetti, M.; Spadoni, T.; Mancini, M.; Fraticelli, P.; Sambo, P.; Funaro, A.; Kazlauskas, A.; et al. Stimulatory Autoantibodies to the PDGF Receptor in Systemic Sclerosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006, 354, 2667–2676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Atanelishvili, I.; Akter, T.; Noguchi, A.; Vuyiv, O.; Wollin, L.; Silver, R.M.; Bogatkevich, G.S. Antifibrotic efficacy of nintedanib in a cellular model of systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2019, 119, 115–124. [Google Scholar]
  51. Arts, M.R.; Baron, M.; Chokr, N.; Fritzler, M.J.; Servant, M.J.; the Canadian Scleroderma Research Group (CSRG). Systemic Sclerosis Immunoglobulin Induces Growth and a Pro-Fibrotic State in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells through the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e100035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Bussone, G.; Tamby, M.C.; Calzas, C.; Kherbeck, N.; Sahbatou, Y.; Sanson, C.; Ghazal, K.; Dib, H.; Weksler, B.B.; Broussard, C.; et al. IgG from patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension and/or systemic sclerosis binds to vascular smooth muscle cells and induces cell contraction. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2011, 71, 596–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Petcu, A.; Ghib, L.J.; Grad, S.M.; Popovici, C.; Rogojan, L.; Rednic, N.V.; Rednic, S. Upper gastrointestinal involvement in systemic sclerosis: Findings in a real-life setting. Exp. Ther. Med. 2019, 18, 5095–5100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Frech, T.M.; Mar, D. Gastrointestinal and Hepatic Disease in Systemic Sclerosis. Rheum. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 2018, 44, 15–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Voulgaris, T.; Karamanolis, G. Esophageal manifestations in patients with scleroderma. World J. Clin. Cases 2021, 9, 5408–5419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Denaxas, K.; Ladas, D.; Karamanolis, P. Evaluation and management of esophageal manifestations in systemic sclerosis. Ann. Gastroenterol. 2018, 31, 165–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Vischio, J.; Saeed, F.; Karimeddini, M.; Mubashir, A.; Feinn, R.; Caldito, G.; Striegel, K.; Rothfield, N. Progression of Esophageal Dysmotility in Systemic Sclerosis. J. Rheumatol. 2012, 39, 986–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Lepri, G.; Guiducci, S.; Bellando-Randone, S.; Giani, I.; Bruni, C.; Blagojevic, J.; Carnesecchi, G.; Radicati, A.; Pucciani, F.; Marco, M.-C. Evidence for oesophageal and anorectal involvement in very early systemic sclerosis (VEDOSS): Report from a single VEDOSS/EUSTAR centre. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2013, 74, 124–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Thonhofer, R.; Siegel, C.; Trummer, M.; Graninger, W. Early endoscopy in systemic sclerosis without gastrointestinal symptoms. Rheumatol. Int. 2010, 32, 165–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kimmel, J.N.; Carlson, D.A.; Hinchcliff, M.; Carns, M.A.; Aren, K.A.; Lee, J.; Pandolfino, J.E. The association between systemic sclerosis disease manifestations and esophageal high-resolution manometry parameters. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2016, 28, 1157–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Li, B.; Yan, J.; Pu, J.; Tang, J.; Xu, S.; Wang, X. Esophageal Dysfunction in Systemic Sclerosis: An Update. Rheumatol. Ther. 2021, 8, 1535–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Roberts, C.; Hummers, L.; Ravich, W.; Wigley, F.; Hutchins, G. A case-control study of the pathology of oesophageal diseae in systemic sclerosis (Scleroderma). Gut 2006, 55, 1697–1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Zuber-Jerger, I.; Müller, A.; Kullmann, F.; Gelbmann, C.M.; Endlicher, E.; Müller-Ladner, U.; Fleck, M. Gastrointestinal manifestation of systemic sclerosis—Thickening of the upper gastrointestinal wall detected by endoscopic ultrasound is a valid sign. Rheumatology 2009, 49, 368–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  64. Taroni, J.N.; Martyanov, V.; Huang, C.-C.; Mahoney, J.M.; Hirano, I.; Shetuni, B.; Yang, G.-Y.; Brenner, D.; Jung, B.; Wood, T.A.; et al. Molecular characterization of systemic sclerosis esophageal pathology identifies inflammatory and proliferative signatures. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2015, 17, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Mcmahan, Z.H.; Hummers, L.K. Gastrointestinal involvement in systemic sclerosis: Diagnosis and management. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 2018, 30, 533–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Marie, I.; Levesque, H.; Ducrotté, P.; Denis, P.; Hellot, M.F.; Benichou, J.; Cailleux, N.; Courtois, H. Gastric Involvement in Systemic Sclerosis: A Prospective Study. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2001, 96, 77–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Miller, J.; Gandhi, N.; Clarke, J.; McMahan, Z. Gastrointestinal involvement in systemic sclerosis: An update. J. Clin. Rheumatol. 2018, 24, 328–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ibba-Manneschi, L.; Del Rosso, A.; Pacini, S.; Tani, A.; Bechi, P.; Cerinic, M.M. Ultrastructural study of the muscle coat of the gastric wall in a case of systemic sclerosis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2002, 61, 754–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Manetti, M.; Milia, A.F.; Benelli, G.; Messerini, L.; Matucci-Cerinic, M.; Ibba-Manneschi, L. The gastric wall in systemic sclerosis patients: A morphological study. Ital. J. Anat. Embryol. 2010, 115, 115–121. [Google Scholar]
  70. Kumar, S.; Singh, J.; Rattan, S.; Dimarino, A.J.; Cohen, S.; Jimenez, S.A. Review article: Pathogenesis and clinical manifestations of gastrointestinal involvement in systemic sclerosis. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2017, 45, 883–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Sakkas, L.I.; Simopoulou, T.; Daoussis, D.; Liossis, S.-N.; Potamianos, S. Intestinal Involvement in Systemic Sclerosis: A Clinical Review. Am. J. Dig. Dis. 2018, 63, 834–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Brandler, J.B.; Sweetser, S.; Khoshbin, K.; Babameto, M.; Prokop, L.J.; Camilleri, M. Colonic Manifestations and Complications Are Relatively Under-Reported in Systemic Sclerosis: A Systematic Review. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2019, 114, 1847–1856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Polkowska-Pruszyńska, B.; Gerkowicz, A.; Szczepanik-Kułak, P.; Krasowska, D. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in systemic sclerosis: A review of the literature. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 2018, 311, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Gregersen, H.; Liao, D.; Pedersen, J.; Drewes, A. A new method for evaluation of intestinal muscle contraction properties: Studies in normal subjects and in patients with systemic sclerosis. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2007, 19, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Thoua, N.M.; Derrett-Smith, E.C.; Khan, K.; Dooley, A.; Shi-Wen, X.; Denton, C.P. Gut fibrosis with altered colonic contractility in a mouse model of scleroderma. Rheumatology 2012, 51, 1989–1998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Braber-Ymker, M.D.; Vonk, M.C.; Grünberg, K.; Lammens, M.; Nagtegaal, I.D. Intestinal hypomotility in systemic sclerosis: A histological study into the sequence of events. Clin. Rheumatol. 2020, 40, 981–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Pinto, R.A.; Corrêa Neto, I.J.F.; Nahas, S.C.; Bustamante Lopes, L.A.; Sobrado Júnior, C.W.; Cecconello, I. Functional and Anatomical analysis of the anorectum of female scleroderma patients at a center for pelvic floor disorders. Arq. Gastroenterol. 2018, 55 (Suppl. 1), 47–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Sattar, B.; Chokshi, R.V. Colonic and Anorectal Manifestations of Systemic Sclerosis. Curr. Gastroenterol. Rep. 2019, 21, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Follansbee, W.P.; Zerbe, T.R.; Medsger, T.A. Cardiac and skeletal muscle disease in systemic sclerosis (scleroderma): A high risk association. Am. Heart J. 1993, 125, 194–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Paik, J.; Mammen, A.; Wigley, F.; Gelber, A. Myopathy in scleroderma, its identification, prevalence, and treatment: Lessons learned from cohort studies. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 2014, 26, 124–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Jablonska, S.; Blaszcyk, M. Scleromyositis: A scleroderma/polymyositis overlap syndrome. Clin. Rheumatol. 1998, 17, 465–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Justo, A.C.; Guimarães, F.S.; Ferreira, A.S.; Soares, M.S.; Bunn, P.S.; Lopes, A.J. Muscle function in women with systemic sclerosis: Association with fatigue and general physical function. Clin. Biomech. 2017, 47, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Pettersson, H.; Boström, C.; Bringby, F.; Walle-Hansen, R.; Jacobsson, L.; Svenungsson, E.; Nordin, A.; Alexanderson, H. Muscle endurance, strength, and active range of motion in patients with different subphenotypes in systemic sclerosis: A cross-sectional cohort study. Scand. J. Rheumatol. 2019, 48, 141–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Maundrell, A.; Proudman, S.; Limaye, V. Prevalence of other connective tissue diseases in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Rheumatol. Int. 2019, 39, 1777–1781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Paik, J. Myopathy in scleroderma and in other connective tissue diaseses. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 2016, 28, 631–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Aguila, L.A.; da Silva, H.C.; Medeiros-Ribeiro, A.C.; Bunjes, B.G.; Luppino-Assad, A.P.; Sampaio-Barros, P.D. Is exposure to environmental factors associated with a characteristic clinical and laboratory profile in systemic sclerosis? A retrospective analysis. Rheumatol. Int. 2020, 41, 1143–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Paik, J.J. Muscle disease in scleroderma. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 2018, 30, 576–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Walker, U.A.; Clements, P.J.; Allanore, Y.; Distler, O.; Oddis, C.V.; Khanna, D.; Furst, D.E. Muscle involvement in systemic sclerosis: Points to consider in clinical trials. Rheumatology 2017, 56 (Suppl. 5), v38–v44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Jung, M.; Bonner, A.; Hudson, M.; Baron, M.; Pope, J.; the Canadian Scleroderma Research Group (CSRG). Myopathy is a poor prognostic feature in systemic sclerosis: Results from the Canadian Scleroderma Research Group (CSRG) cohort. Scand. J. Rheumatol. 2013, 43, 217–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Paik, J.J.; Wigley, F.M.; Mejia, A.F.; Hummers, L.K. Independent Association of Severity of Muscle Weakness With Disability as Measured by the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index in Scleroderma. Arthritis Care Res. 2016, 68, 1695–1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Ranque, B.; Bérezné, A.; Le-Guern, V.; Pagnoux, C.; Allanore, Y.; Launay, D.; Hachulla, E.; Authier, F.J.; Gherardi, R.; Kahan, A.; et al. Myopathies related to systemic sclerosis: A case-control study of associated clinical and immunological features. Scand. J. Rheumatol. 2010, 39, 498–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Araujo, C.; Miossi, R.; De Souza, F.; Costa, M.; Da Silva, A.; Campos, E.; Zanoteli, E.; Shinjo, S. Brachio-cervical inflammatory myopathy associated with systemic sclerosis. Case series and review of literature. Reumatismo 2021, 73, 122–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Shimada, T.; Higashida-Konishi, M.; Akiyama, M.; Hama, S.; Takei, H.; Izumi, K.; Oshima, H.; Okano, Y. Dropped head in systemic sclerosis: A case based review. Rheumatol. Int. 2021, 42, 1483–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Tolédano, C.; Gain, M.; Kettaneh, A.; Baudin, B.; Johanet, C.; Chérin, P.; Rivière, S.; Cabane, J.; Tiev, K.P. Aldolase predicts subsequent myopathy occurrence in systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2012, 14, R152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Ross, L.; Lindqvist, A.; Costello, B.; Hansen, D.; Brown, Z.; Day, J.A.; Stevens, W.; Burns, A.; Perera, W.; Pianta, M.; et al. Using magnetic resonance imaging to map the hidden burden of muscle involvement in systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2022, 24, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Dumitru, R.B.; Goodall, A.F.; Broadbent, D.A.; Del Galdo, F.; Tan, A.L.; Biglands, J.D.; Buch, M.H. First pilot study of extracellular volume MRI measurement in peripheral muscle of systemic sclerosis patients suggests diffuse fibrosis. Rheumatology 2021, 61, 1651–1657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Ranque, B.; Authier, F.J.; Le-Guern, V.; Pagnoux, C.; Berezne, A.; Allanore, Y.; Launay, D.; Hachulla, E.; Kahan, A.; Cabane, J.; et al. A descriptive and prognostic study of systemic sclerosis-associated myopathies. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2008, 68, 1474–1477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Schanz, S.; Henes, J.; Ulmer, A.; Kötter, I.; Fierlbeck, G.; Claussen, C.D.; Horger, M. Magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients with systemic scleroderma and musculoskeletal symptoms. Eur. Radiol. 2012, 23, 212–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Zhou, M.; Jiang, L.; Nie, L.; Chen, T.; Zhang, T.; Sun, W.; Sutikno, J.; Du, Y.; Xue, J. Myopathy is a Risk Factor for Poor Prognosis of Patients with Systemic Sclerosis: A retrospective cohort study. Medicine 2020, 99, e21734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Baumberger, R.; Jordan, S.; Distler, O.; Pfister, P.B.; Maurer, B. Diagnostic measures for patients with systemic sclerosis-associated myopathy. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2021, 39 (Suppl. 131), 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Lefebvre, F.; Giannini, M.; Ellezam, B.; Leclair, V.; Troyanov, Y.; Hoa, S.; Bourré-Tessier, J.; Satoh, M.; Fritzler, M.J.; Senécal, J.-L.; et al. Histopathological features of systemic sclerosis-associated myopathy: A scoping review. Autoimmun. Rev. 2021, 20, 102851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Paik, J.J.; Wigley, F.M.; Shah, A.A.; Corse, A.M.; Casciola-Rosen, L.; Hummers, L.K.; Mammen, A.L. Association of Fibrosing Myopathy in Systemic Sclerosis and Higher Mortality. Arthritis Care Res. 2017, 69, 1764–1770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Siegert, E.; Uruha, A.; Goebel, H.-H.; Preuße, C.; Casteleyn, V.; Kleefeld, F.; Alten, R.; Burmester, G.R.; Schneider, U.; Höppner, J.; et al. Systemic sclerosis-associated myositis features minimal inflammation and characteristic capillary pathology. Acta Neuropathol. 2021, 141, 917–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Paik, J.J.; Wigley, F.M.; Lloyd, T.E.; Corse, A.M.; Casciola-Rosen, L.; Shah, A.A.; Boin, F.; Hummers, L.K.; Mammen, A.L. Spectrum of Muscle Histopathologic Findings in Forty-Two Scleroderma Patients With Weakness. Arthritis Care Res. 2015, 67, 1416–1425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Koschik, R.W.; Fertig, N.; Lucas, M.R.; Domsic, R.T.; Medsger, T.A. Anti-PM-Scl antibody in patients with systemic sclerosis. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2022, 30 (Suppl. 71), S12–S16. [Google Scholar]
  106. Wielosz, E.; Dryglewska, M.; Majdan, M. The prevalence and significance of anti-PM/Scl antibodies in systemic sclerosis. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 2021, 28, 189–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Mahler, M.; Raijmakers, R. Novel aspects of autoantibodies to the PM/Scl complex: Clinical, genetic and diagnostic insights. Autoimmun. Rev. 2007, 6, 432–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Hamaguchi, Y.; Takehara, K. Anti-nuclear autoantibodies in systemic sclerosis: News and perspectives. J. Scleroderma Relat. Disord. 2018, 3, 201–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. De Lorenzo, R.; Pinal-Fernandez, I.; Huang, W.; Albayda, J.; Tiniakou, E.; Johnson, C.; Milisenda, J.C.; Casal-Dominguez, M.; Corse, A.M.; Danoff, S.K.; et al. Muscular and extramuscular clinical features of patients with anti-PM/Scl autoantibodies. Neurology 2018, 90, e2068–e2076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Cozzani, E.; Muracchioli, A.; Murdaca, G.; Beccalli, M.; Caprioli, S.; Zentilin, P.; Ameri, P.; Grosso, M.; Russo, R.; Carmisciano, L.; et al. Correlation Between Skin and Affected Organs in 52 Sclerodermic Patients Followed in a Diseases Management Team: Development of a Risk Prediction Model of Organ-Specific Complications. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 588753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. D’Aoust, J.; Hudson, M.; Tatibouet, S.; Wick, J.; Mahler, M.; Baron, M.; Fritzler, M.J.; the Canadian Scleroderma Research Group. Clinical and Serologic Correlates of Anti-PM/Scl Antibodies in Systemic Sclerosis: A Multicenter Study of 763 Patients. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014, 66, 1608–1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Wodkowski, M.; Hudson, M.; Proudman, S.; Walker, J.; Stevens, W.; Nikpour, M.; Assassi, S.; Mayes, M.D.; Tatibouet, S.; Wang, M. Clinical correlates of monospecific anti-PM75 and anti-PM100 antibodies in a tri-nation cohort of 1574 systemic sclerosis subjects. Autoimmunity 2015, 48, 542–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Leurs, A.; Dubucquoi, S.; Machuron, F.; Balden, M.; Renaud, F.; Rogeau, S.; Lopez, B.; Lambert, M.; Morell-Dubois, S.; Maillard, H.; et al. Extended myositis-specific and -associated antibodies profile in systemic sclerosis: A cross-sectional study. Jt. Bone Spine 2021, 88, 105048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Lazzaroni, M.-G.; Marasco, E.; Campochiaro, C.; DeVries-Bouwstra, J.; Gonzalez-Perez, M.-I.; Rojas-Serrano, J.; Hachulla, E.; Zanatta, E.; Barsotti, S.; Furini, F.; et al. The clinical phenotype of systemic sclerosis patients with anti-PM/Scl antibodies: Results from the EUSTAR cohort. Rheumatology 2021, 60, 5028–5041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Arandia, N.I.; Espinosa, G.; Del Castillo, A.G.; Tolosa-Vilella, C.; Colunga-Argüelles, D.; Lledó, G.M.; Comet, L.S.; Ortego-Centeno, N.; Hito, J.A.V.; Rubio-Rivas, M.; et al. Anti-Polymyositis/Scl Antibodies in Systemic Sclerosis: Clinical Associations in a Multicentric Spanish Cohort and Review of the Literature. J. Clin. Rheumatol. 2022, 28, e180–e188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Fredi, M.; Cavazzana, I.; Franceschini, F. The clinico-serological spectrum of overlap myositis. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 2018, 30, 637–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Van den Hoogen, F.; Khanna, D.; Fransen, J.; Johnson, S.R.; Baron, M.; Tyndall, A.; Matucci-Cerinic, M.; Naden, R.P.; Medsger, T.A., Jr.; Carreira, P.E.; et al. 2013 classification criteria for systemic sclerosis: An American college of rheumatology/European league against rheumatism collaborative initiative. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2013, 72, 1747–1755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Bottai, M.; Tjärnlund, A.; Santoni, G.; Werth, V.P.; Pilkington, C.; de Visser, M.; Alfredsson, L.; Amato, A.A.; Barohn, R.J.; Liang, M.H.; et al. EULAR/ACR classification criteria for adult and juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies and their major subgroups: A methodology report. RMD Open 2017, 3, e000507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Leclair, V.; D’Aoust, J.; Gyger, G.; Landon-Cardinal, O.; Meyer, A.; O'Ferrall, E.; Karamchandani, J.; Massie, R.; Ellezam, B.; Satoh, M.; et al. Autoantibody profiles delineate distinct subsets of scleromyositis. Rheumatology 2021, 61, 1148–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Szabó, K.; Bodoki, L.; Nagy-Vincze, M.; Béldi, T.; Vincze, A.; Zilahi, E.; Varga, J.; Szűcs, G.; Dankó, K.; Griger, Z. Clinical, Serological, and Genetic Characteristics of a Hungarian Myositis-Scleroderma Overlap Cohort. BioMed Res. Int. 2022, 2022, 6251232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Bhansing, K.J.; Lammens, M.; Knaapen, H.K.; Van Riel, P.L.; Van Engelen, B.G.; Vonk, M.C. Scleroderma-polymyositis overlap syndrome versus idiopathic polymyositis and systemic sclerosis: A descriptive study on clinical features and myopathology. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2014, 16, R111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Landon-Cardinal, O.; Baril-Dionne, A.; Hoa, S.; Meyer, A.; LeClair, V.; Bourré-Tessier, J.; Mansour, A.-M.; Zarka, F.; Makhzoum, J.-P.; Nehme, J.; et al. Recognising the spectrum of scleromyositis: HEp-2 ANA patterns allow identification of a novel clinical subset with anti-SMN autoantibodies. RMD Open 2020, 6, e001357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. An, H.; Tizaoui, K.; Terrazzino, S.; Cargnin, S.; Lee, K.; Nam, S.; Kim, J.; Yang, J.; Lee, J.; Smith, L.; et al. Sarcopenia in Autoimmune and Rheumatic Diseases: A Comprehensive Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Cruz-Jentoft, A.J.; Baeyens, J.P.; Bauer, J.M.; Boirie, Y.; Cederholm, T.; Landi, F.; Martin, F.C.; Michel, J.-P.; Rolland, Y.; Schneider, S.M.; et al. Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: Report of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Age Ageing 2010, 39, 412–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Dalle, S.; Rossmeislova, L.; Koppo, K. The Role of Inflammation in Age-Related Sarcopenia. Front. Physiol. 2017, 8, 1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Beyer, I.; Mets, T.; Bautmans, I. Chronic low-grade inflammation and age-related sarcopenia. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 2012, 15, 12–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Marighela, T.F.; Genaro, P.D.S.; Pinheiro, M.M.; Szejnfeld, V.L.; Kayser, C. Risk factors for body composition abnormalities in systemic sclerosis. Clin. Rheumatol. 2013, 32, 1037–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Cruz-Jentoft, A.J.; Bahat, G.; Bauer, J.; Boirie, Y.; Bruyère, O.; Cederholm, T.; Cooper, C.; Landi, F.; Rolland, Y.; Sayer, A.A.; et al. Writing Group for the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 (EWGSOP2), and the Extended Group for EWGSOP2. Sarcopenia: Revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing 2019, 48, 16–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Caimmi, C.; Caramaschi, P.; Venturini, A.; Bertoldo, E.; Vantaggiato, E.; Viapiana, O.; Ferrari, M.; Lippi, G.; Frulloni, L.; Rossini, M. Malnutrition and sarcopenia in a large cohort of patients with systemic sclerosis. Clin. Rheumatol. 2017, 37, 987–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Siegert, E.; March, C.; Otten, L.; Makowka, A.; Preis, E.; Buttgereit, F.; Riemekasten, G.; Müller-Werdan, U.; Norman, K. Prevalence of sarcopenia in systemic sclerosis: Assessing body composition and functional disability in patients with systemic sclerosis. Nutrition 2018, 55–56, 51–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Corallo, C.; Fioravanti, A.; Tenti, S.; Pecetti, G.; Nuti, R.; Giordano, N. Sarcopenia in systemic sclerosis: The impact of nutritional, clinical, and laboratory features. Rheumatol. Int. 2019, 39, 1767–1775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Paolino, S.; Goegan, F.; Cimmino, M.A.; Casabella, A.; Pizzorni, C.; Patanè, M.; Schenone, C.; Tomatis, V.; Sulli, A.; Gotelli, E.; et al. Advanced microvascular damage associated with occurence of sarcopenia in systemic sclerosis patients: Results from a retrospective cohort study. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2020, 38 (Suppl. 125), 65–72. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  133. Hax, V.; Santo, R.C.D.E.; dos Santos, L.P.; Farinon, M.; de Oliveira, M.S.; Três, G.L.; Gasparin, A.A.; de Andrade, N.P.B.; Bredemeier, M.; Xavier, R.M.; et al. Practical screening tools for sarcopenia in patients with systemic sclerosis. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0245683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Doerfler, B.; Allen, T.S.; Southwood, C.; Brenner, D.; Hirano, I.; Sheean, P. Medical Nutrition Therapy for Patients With Advanced Systemic Sclerosis (MNT PASS): A Pilot Intervention Study. J. Parenter. Enter. Nutr. 2015, 41, 678–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Cen, X.; Feng, S.; Wei, S.; Yan, L.; Sun, L. Systemic sclerosis and risk of cardiovascular disease: A PRISMA-compliant systemic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Medicine 2020, 99, e23009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Elhai, M.; Meune, C.; Boubaya, M.; Avouac, J.; Hachulla, E.; Balbir-Gurman, A.; Riemekasten, G.; Airã, P.; Joven, B.; Vettori, S.; et al. Mapping and predicting mortality from systemic sclerosis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2017, 76, 1897–1905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Jaeger, V.; Wirz, E.G.; Allanore, Y.; Rossbach, P.; Riemekasten, G.; Hachulla, E.; Distler, O.; Airò, P.; Carreira, P.E.; Gurman, A.B.; et al. Incidences and Risk Factors of Organ Manifestations in the Early Course of Systemic Sclerosis: A Longitudinal EUSTAR Study. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0163894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Allanore, Y.; Meune, C.; Vonk, M.; Airo, P.; Hachulla, E.; Caramaschi, P.; Riemekasten, G.; Cozzi, F.; Beretta, L.; Derk, C.T.; et al. Prevalence and factors associated with left ventricular dysfunction in the EULAR Scleroderma Trial and Research group (EUSTAR) database of patients with systemic sclerosis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2009, 69, 218–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Parks, J.L.; Taylor, M.H.; Parks, L.P.; Silver, R.M. Systemic Sclerosis and the Heart. Rheum. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 2014, 40, 87–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Ross, L.; Prior, D.; Proudman, S.; Vacca, A.; Baron, M.; Nikpour, M. Defining primary systemic sclerosis heart involvement: A scoping literature review. Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 2019, 48, 874–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Krumm, P.; Mueller, K.A.L.; Klingel, K.; Krämer, U.; Horger, M.S.; Zitzelsberger, T.; Kandolf, R.; Gawaz, M.; Nikolaou, K.; Klumpp, B.D.; et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance patterns of biopsy proven cardiac involvement in systemic sclerosis. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 2016, 18, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Sandmeier, B.; Jaeger, V.; Nagy, G.; Carreira, P.E.; Tzankov, A.; Widuchowska, M.; Antic, M.; Distler, O.; Reichert, H.; Distler, J.H.W.; et al. Autopsy versus clinical findings in patients with systemic sclerosis in a case series from patients of the EUSTAR database. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2015, 33 (Suppl. 91), S75–S79. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  143. Bournia, V.-K.; Tountas, C.; Protogerou, A.D.; Panopoulos, S.; Mavrogeni, S.; Sfikakis, P.P. Update on assessment and management of primary cardiac involvement in systemic sclerosis. J. Scleroderma Relat. Disord. 2018, 3, 53–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Bruni, C.; Ross, L. Cardiac involvement in systemic sclerosis: Getting to the heart of the matter. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Rheumatol. 2021, 35, 101668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Allanore, Y.; Meune, C. Primary myocardial involvement in systemic sclerosis: Evidence for a microvascular origin. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2010, 28 (Suppl. 62), S48–S53. [Google Scholar]
  146. Giucă, A.; Gegenava, T.; Mihai, C.M.; Jurcuţ, C.; Săftoiu, A.; Gȋrniţă, D.M.; Popescu, B.A.; Marsan, N.A.; Jurcuț, R. Sclerodermic Cardiomyopathy—A State-of-the-Art Review. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. D’Angelo, W.; Fries, J.; Masi, A.; Shulman, L. Pathologic observations in systemic sclerosis (scleroderma). A study of fifty-eight autopsy cases and fifty-eight matched controls. Am. J. Med. 1969, 46, 428–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Bulkley, B.H.; Ridolfi, R.L.; Salyer, W.R.; Hutchins, G.M. Myocardial lesions of progressive systemic sclerosis. A cause of cardiac dysfunction. Circulation 1976, 53, 483–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Murata, I.; Takenaka, K.; Shinohara, S.; Suzuki, T.; Sasaki, T.; Yamamoto, K. Diversity of myocardial involvement in systemic sclerosis: An 8-year study of 95 Japanese patients. Am. Heart J. 1998, 135 Pt 1, 960–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Fernandes, F.; Ramires, F.J.A.; Arteaga, E.; Ianni, B.M.; Bonfá, E.S.D.O.; Mady, C. Cardiac remodeling in patients with systemic sclerosis with no signs or symptoms of heart failure: An endomyocardial biopsy study. J. Card. Fail. 2003, 9, 311–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Mueller, K.A.L.; Mueller, I.I.; Eppler, D.; Zuern, C.; Seizer, P.; Kramer, U.; Koetter, I.; Roecken, M.; Kandolf, R.; Gawaz, M.; et al. Clinical and Histopathological Features of Patients with Systemic Sclerosis Undergoing Endomyocardial Biopsy. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0126707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. De Luca, G.; Campochiaro, C.; De Santis, M.; Sartorelli, S.; Peretto, G.; Sala, S.; Canestrari, G.; De Lorenzis, E.; Basso, C.; Rizzo, S.; et al. Systemic sclerosis myocarditis has unique clinical, histological and prognostic features: A comparative histological analysis. Rheumatology 2020, 59, 2523–2533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Sano, M.; Satoh, H.; Suwa, K.; Nobuhara, M.; Saitoh, T.; Saotome, M.; Urushida, T.; Katoh, H.; Shimoyama, K.; Suzuki, D.; et al. Characteristics and clinical relevance of late gadolinium enhancement in cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with systemic sclerosis. Hear. Vessel. 2014, 30, 779–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Rodríguez-Reyna, T.S.; Morelos-Guzman, M.; Hernández-Reyes, P.; Montero-Duarte, K.; Martínez-Reyes, C.; Reyes-Utrera, C.; Madrid, J.V.-L.; Morales-Blanhir, J.; Núñez-Álvarez, C.; Cabiedes-Contreras, J. Assessment of myocardial fibrosis and microvascular damage in systemic sclerosis by magnetic resonance imaging and coronary angiotomography. Rheumatology 2014, 54, 647–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Mavrogeni, S.I.; Bratis, K.; Karabela, G.; Spiliotis, G.; Van Wijk, K.; Hautemann, D.; Reiber, J.H.C.; Koutsogeorgopoulou, L.; Markousis-Mavrogenis, G.; Kolovou, G.; et al. Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging clarifies cardiac pathophysiology in early, asymptomatic diffuse systemic sclerosis. Inflamm. Allergy-Drug Targets 2015, 14, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Barison, A.; Gargani, L.; De Marchi, D.; Aquaro, G.D.; Guiducci, S.; Picano, E.; Cerinic, M.M.; Pingitore, A. Early myocardial and skeletal muscle interstitial remodelling in systemic sclerosis: Insights from extracellular volume quantification using cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Eur. Hear. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2014, 16, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Mavrogeni, S.; Karabela, G.; Koutsogeorgopoulou, L.; Stavropoulos, E.; Katsifis, G.; Plastiras, S.C.; Kitas, G.D.; Panopoulos, S.; Pentazos, G.; Tzatzaki, E.; et al. Pseudo-infarction pattern in diffuse systemic sclerosis. Evaluation using cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Int. J. Cardiol. 2016, 214, 465–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Kobayashi, Y.; Kobayashi, H.; Giles, J.T.; Yokoe, I.; Hirano, M.; Nakajima, Y.; Takei, M. Detection of Left Ventricular Regional Dysfunction and Myocardial Abnormalities Using Complementary Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis without Cardiac Symptoms: A Pilot Study. Intern. Med. 2016, 55, 237–243. [Google Scholar]
  159. Meduri, A.; Di Molfetta, D.V.; Natale, L.; Manfredi, R. Cardiac magnetic resonance in systemic sclerosis patients with cardiac symptoms. Eur. Rev. Med Pharmacol. Sci. 2017, 21, 4797–4803. [Google Scholar]
  160. Mavrogeni, S.; Koutsogeorgopoulou, L.; Karabela, G.; Stavropoulos, E.; Katsifis, G.; Raftakis, J.; Plastiras, S.; Noutsias, M.; Markousis-Mavrogenis, G.; Kolovou, G. Silent myocarditis in systemic sclerosis detected by cardiovascular magnetic resonance using Lake Louise criteria. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 2017, 17, 187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Hromádka, M.; Seidlerová, J.; Suchý, D.; Rajdl, D.; Lhotský, J.; Ludvík, J.; Rokyta, R.; Baxa, J. Myocardial fibrosis detected by magnetic resonance in systemic sclerosis patients—Relationship with biochemical and echocardiography parameters. Int. J. Cardiol. 2017, 249, 448–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Giacomelli, R.; Di Cesare, E.; Cipriani, P.; Ruscitti, P.; Di Sibio, A.; Liakouli, V.; Gennarelli, A.; Carubbi, F.; Splendiani, A.; Berardicurti, O.; et al. Pharmacological stress, rest perfusion and delayed enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance identifies very early cardiac involvement in systemic sclerosis patients of recent onset. Int. J. Rheum. Dis. 2017, 20, 1247–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Muresan, L.; Oancea, I.; Mada, R.O.; Petcu, A.; Pamfil, C.; Muresan, C.; Rinzis, M.; Pop, D.; Zdrenghea, D.; Rednic, S. Relationship Between Ventricular Arrhythmias, Conduction Disorders, and Myocardial Fibrosis in Patients With Systemic Sclerosis. JCR J. Clin. Rheumatol. 2018, 24, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Lee, D.C.; Hinchcliff, M.E.; Sarnari, R.; Stark, M.M.; Lee, J.; Koloms, K.; Hoffmann, A.; Carns, M.; Thakrar, A.; Aren, K.; et al. Diffuse cardiac fibrosis quantification in early systemic sclerosis by magnetic resonance imaging and correlation with skin fibrosis. J. Scleroderma Relat. Disord. 2018, 3, 159–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Gyllenhammar, T.; Kanski, M.; Engblom, H.; Wuttge, D.M.; Carlsson, M.; Hesselstrand, R.; Arheden, H. Decreased global myocardial perfusion at adenosine stress as a potential new biomarker for microvascular disease in systemic sclerosis: A magnetic resonance study. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 2018, 18, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Bissell, L.A.; Dumitru, R.B.; Erhayiem, B.; Abignano, G.; Fent, G.; Kidambi, A.; Donica, H.; Burska, A.; Del Galdo, F.; Biglands, G.; et al. Incidental significant arrhythmia in scleroderma associates with cardiac magnetic resonance measure of fibrosis and hs-TnI and NT-proBNP. Rheumatology 2019, 58, 1221–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Tipparot, T.; Foocharoen, C.; Mahakkanukrauh, A.; Suwannaroj, S.; Nanagara, R.; Pussadhamma, B.; Chaosuwannakit, N. Clinical and laboratory predictions of myocardial inflammation as detected by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with systemic sclerosis: A pilot study. Int. J. Rheum. Dis. 2019, 22, 2125–2133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Sugiyama, K.; Kobayashi, H.; Kobayashi, Y.; Yokoe, I.; Takei, M.; Kitamura, N. Association of cardiac magnetic resonance-detected myocardial abnormalities with disease characteristics and brain natriuretic peptide levels in systemic sclerosis without cardiac symptoms. Int. J. Rheum. Dis. 2019, 22, 1016–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Rodríguez-Reyna, T.S.; Rosales-Uvera, S.G.; Kimura-Hayama, E.; Hernández-Reyes, P.; Mercado-Velázquez, P.; Benavides-Suárez, S.A.; Esquinca-González, A.; Núñez-Álvarez, C.A. Myocardial fibrosis detected by magnetic resonance imaging, elevated U-CRP and higher mRSS are predictors of cardiovascular complications in systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients. Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 2019, 49, 273–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Markousis-Mavrogenis, G.; Bournia, V.-K.; Panopoulos, S.; Koutsogeorgopoulou, L.; Kanoupakis, G.; Apostolou, D.; Katsifis, G.; Polychroniadis, M.; Dimitroulas, T.; Kolovou, G.; et al. Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Identifies High-Risk Systemic Sclerosis Patients with Normal Echocardiograms and Provides Incremental Prognostic Value. Diagnostics 2019, 9, 220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Gigante, A.; Galea, N.; Borrazzo, C.; Tubani, L.; Liberatori, M.; Ciolina, F.; Fiorelli, A.; Romaniello, A.; Barbano, B.; Romaggioli, L.; et al. Role of autonomic dysfunction in the regulation of myocardial blood flow in systemic sclerosis evaluated by cardiac magnetic resonance. Int. J. Rheum. Dis. 2019, 22, 1029–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Bratis, K.; Lindholm, A.; Hesselstrand, R.; Arheden, H.; Karabela, G.; Stavropoulos, E.; Katsifis, G.; Kolovou, G.; Kitas, G.D.; Sfikakis, P.P.; et al. CMR feature tracking in cardiac asymptomatic systemic sclerosis: Clinical implications. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0221021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Terrier, B.; Dechartres, A.; Gouya, H.; Ben Arfi, M.; Bérézne, A.; Régent, A.; Dunogué, B.; London, J.; Cohen, P.; Guillevin, L.; et al. Cardiac Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging With T1 Mapping to Assess Myocardial Perfusion and Fibrosis in Systemic Sclerosis: Association With Cardiac Events From a Prospective Cohort Study. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020, 72, 1571–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Poindron, V.; Chatelus, E.; Canuet, M.; Gottenberg, J.-E.; Arnaud, L.; Gangi, A.; Gavand, P.-E.; Guffroy, A.; Korganow, A.-S.; Germain, P.; et al. T1 mapping cardiac magnetic resonance imaging frequently detects subclinical diffuse myocardial fibrosis in systemic sclerosis patients. Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 2019, 50, 128–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Mavrogeni, S.; Gargani, L.; Pepe, A.; Monti, L.; Markousis-Mavrogenis, G.; De Santis, M.; De Marchi, D.; Koutsogeorgopoulou, L.; Karabela, G.; Stavropoulos, E.; et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance predicts ventricular arrhythmias in scleroderma: The Scleroderma Arrhythmia Clinical Utility Study (SAnCtUS). Rheumatology 2019, 59, 1938–1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Markousis-Mavrogenis, G.; Koutsogeorgopoulou, L.; Katsifis, G.; Dimitroulas, T.; Kolovou, G.; Kitas, G.D.; Sfikakis, P.P.; Mavrogeni, S.I. The Double-Edged Sword of T1-Mapping in Systemic Sclerosis—A Comparison with Infectious Myocarditis Using Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. Diagnostics 2020, 10, 335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Galea, N.; Rosato, E.; Gigante, A.; Borrazzo, C.; Fiorelli, A.; Barchetti, G.; Trombetta, A.C.; DiGiulio, M.A.; Francone, M.; Catalano, C.; et al. Early myocardial damage and microvascular dysfunction in asymptomatic patients with systemic sclerosis: A cardiovascular magnetic resonance study with cold pressor test. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0244282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Bordonaro, V.; Bivort, D.; Dresselaers, T.; De Langhe, E.; Bogaert, J.; Symons, R. Myocardial T1 mapping and extracellular volume quantification as novel biomarkers in risk stratification of patients with systemic sclerosis. Clin. Radiol. 2020, 76, 162.e1–162.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Hromadka, M.; Baxa, J.; Seidlerova, J.; Miklik, R.; Rajdl, D.; Sudova, V.; Suchy, D.; Rokyta, R. Myocardial Involvement Detected Using Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis: A Prospective Observational Study. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 5364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Dumitru, R.B.; Bissell, L.-A.; Erhayiem, B.; Fent, G.; Kidambi, A.; Swoboda, P.; Abignano, G.; Donica, H.; Burska, A.; Greenwood, J.P.; et al. Predictors of subclinical systemic sclerosis primary heart involvement characterised by microvasculopathy and myocardial fibrosis. Rheumatology 2020, 60, 2934–2945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Dumitru, R.B.; Bissell, L.-A.; Erhayiem, B.; Kidambi, A.; Dumitru, A.-M.H.; Fent, G.; Abignano, G.; Donica, H.; Burska, A.; Greenwood, J.P.; et al. Cardiovascular outcomes in systemic sclerosis with abnormal cardiovascular MRI and serum cardiac biomarkers. RMD Open 2021, 7, e001689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Vos, J.L.; Butcher, S.C.; Fortuni, F.; Galloo, X.; Rodwell, L.; Vonk, M.C.; Bax, J.J.; van Leuven, S.I.; de Vries-Bouwstra, J.K.; Snoeren, M.; et al. The Prognostic Value of Right Atrial and Right Ventricular Functional Parameters in Systemic Sclerosis. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2022, 9, 845359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Palumbo, P.; Ruscitti, P.; Cannizzaro, E.; Berardicurti, O.; Conforti, A.; Di Cesare, A.; Di Cola, I.; Giacomelli, R.; Splendiani, A.; Barile, A.; et al. Unenhanced Cardiac Magnetic Resonance may improve detection and prognostication of an occult heart involvement in asymptomatic patients with systemic sclerosis. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 5125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Knight, D.S.; Karia, N.; Cole, A.R.; Maclean, R.H.; Brown, J.T.; Masi, A.; Patel, R.K.; Razvi, Y.; Chacko, L.; Venneri, L.; et al. Distinct cardiovascular phenotypes are associated with prognosis in systemic sclerosis: A cardiovascular magnetic resonance study. Eur. Heart J.—Cardiovasc. Imaging 2022, jeac120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.