Next Article in Journal
Application of Deferoxamine in Tissue Regeneration Attributed to Promoted Angiogenesis
Next Article in Special Issue
2-Pyridylmetallocenes, Part IX. Sulphur-Substituted 2-Pyridylferrocene: Synthesis and Reactivity towards Pt(II) and Hg(II)
Previous Article in Journal
Adenosine Encapsulation and Characterization through Layer-by-Layer Assembly of Hydroxypropyl-β-Cyclodextrin and Whey Protein Isolate as Wall Materials
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 29
Issue 9
10.3390/molecules29092047
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Cleavage of [Pd2(PP)2(μ-Cl)2][BArF24]2 (PP = Bis(phosphino)ferrocene, BArF24 = Tetrakis(3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)borate) with Monodentate Phosphines

by
Ian S. Leiby
1,
Virginia Parparcén
1,
Natalya Ding
1,†,
Klara J. Kunz
1,‡,
Sadie A. Wolfarth
1,§,
Jeremiah E. Stevens
2 and
Chip Nataro
1,*
1
Department of Chemistry, Lafayette College, Easton, PA 18045, USA
2
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Current address: Southern Lehigh High School, Center Valley, PA 18034, USA.
‡
Current address: Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.
§
Current address: Department of Chemistry, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.
Molecules 2024, 29(9), 2047; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29092047
Submission received: 25 March 2024 / Revised: 17 April 2024 / Accepted: 27 April 2024 / Published: 29 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ferrocene and Related Iron Complexes: Synthesis, Reactivity and Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The addition of Na[BArF24] (BArF24 = tetrakis(3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)borate) to [Pd(PP)Cl2] (PP = 1,1′-bis(phosphino)ferrocene ligands) compounds results in the loss of a chloride ligand and the formation of the dimeric species [Pd2(PP)2(μ-Cl)2][BArF24]2. In most cases, the addition of a monodentate phosphine, PR3, to these dimeric species leads to cleaving of the dimer and formation of [Pd(PP)(PR3)Cl][BArF24]. While these reactions are readily observed via a significant color change, the 31P{1H} NMR spectra offer more significant support, as the singlet for the dimer is replaced with three doublets of doublets. The reaction seems to take place for a wide range of PR3 ligands, although there do appear to be steric limitations to the reaction. The compounds were thoroughly characterized by NMR, and X-ray crystal structures of several of the compounds were obtained. In addition, the ferrocenyl backbone of the 1,1′-bis(phosphino)ferrocene ligands provides an opportunity to examine the oxidative electrochemistry of these compounds. In general, the potential at which oxidations of these compounds occurs shows a dependence on the phosphine substituents.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Palladium(II) compounds with the general formula [Pd(PP)Cl2] (PP = two monodentate phosphines or a bidentate phosphine) are commonly used in a wide variety of catalytic applications [1]. When it comes to stoichiometric reactions, one of the more common is the abstraction of a chloride ligand, typically resulting in the formation of a dicationic dimer with the general formula [Pd2(PP)2(μ-Cl)2][X]2. Numerous reagents have been employed to form these dimers, including BF3 [2,3,4], alkali metal salts [5,6,7], [Cu(MeCN)4][ClO4] [8], silver salts [3,6,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23], thallium salts [24,25], and [Et3O][BF4] [19]. There have also been several reports in which these dimers form over time in solutions of related species [26,27,28]. While there are many possible routes to these dimers, there are additional factors in their formation. The choice of solvent is significant, as the addition of AgX (X = BF4− or ClO4−) to [Pd(dppe)Cl2] in pyridine, dimethylformamide, or dimethylsulfoxide leads to the formation of the solvent-bound species [Pd(dppe)(S)Cl][X] (S = py, dmf or dmso), while the same reactions in acetone, methanol, acetonitrile, tetrahydrofuran, and benzene gave [Pd2(dppe)2(μ-Cl)2][X]2 [9,29]. Both the solvent and the anion influence the relative stability of the dimer with respect to formation of monometallic compounds for [Pd2(bicyclo [3.2.0]heptanyl diphosphinite)2(μ-Cl)2]X2 [6]. The ligands also played a role in this reactivity, as the related [Pd(Ph2ECH2CH2E′Ph2)Cl2] (E = P, E′ = As or E = E′ = As) reacted with AgX to give dimers in all of the aforementioned solvents [29].
Although dimer formation has been reported using a variety of different reagents, there have been surprisingly few studies examining the reactivity of these dimers. The majority of these reactions have focused on the addition of L-type ligands that replace the L-type interaction of a bridging chloride [30]. The first reported study showed that the phosphine can have a significant impact on the reactivity, as there was no reaction between CO and [Pd2(PPh3)4(μ-Cl)2][BF4]2, but CO cleaved the analogous PEt3 dimer to give [Pd(PEt3)2(CO)Cl][BF4] [2,3]. A later study determined that there was no reaction between CO and [Pd2(dppe)2(μ-Cl)2][ClO4]2, but the addition of PPh3 to [Pd2(dppe)2(μ-Cl)2][ClO4]2 resulted in breaking the dimer and formation of [Pd(dppe)(PPh3)Cl][ClO4] [29]. While not prepared directly from [Pd2(PEt3)4(μ-Cl)2][BF4]2, the addition of PR3 (R = Et or Ph) to [Pd(PEt3)2Cl2] in the presence of Na[BPh4] to give [Pd(PEt3)2(PR3)Cl][BPh4] suggests that [Pd2(PEt3)4(μ-Cl)2][BF4]2 could be cleaved by the addition of monodentate phosphines [3]. When [Pd2(dppf)2(μ-Cl)2][BF4]2 (dppf = 1,1′-bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene) was dissolved in MeCN, the dimer was cleaved to give [Pd(dppf)(MeCN)Cl][BF4] [14]. A similar reaction was observed for [Pd2(dppp)2(μ-Cl)2][P(1,2-C6H4O2)3]2 [7]. The reverse reaction of dimer formation can also be accomplished by adding chloride to a dimer, as shown by the reaction of [Pd(dppo)2(μ-Cl)2][BArF24]2 (dppo = 1,1′-bis(diphenylphosphino)osmocene and BArF24 = tetrakis(3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)borate) with [PPN]Cl (PPN = bis(triphenylphosphine)iminium) [31]. One additional reaction that has been reported is the addition of HSiMe(OEt)2 to what is presumed to be [Pd2(BINAP)2(μ-Cl)2][OTf]2, which results in the formation of [Pd(BINAP)(H)Cl] [20].
Additional stoichiometric reactions of these dimers focused on the substitution of the remaining chloride ligands. The addition of two equivalents of Ag[BF4] to [Pd2(dppf)2(μ-Cl)2][BF4]2 results in the removal of the chloride ligands and the formation of [Pd(dppf)(dmf)2][BF4] if the reaction is performed in DMF or [Pd2(dppf)2(μ-OH)2][BF4]2 if the reaction is performed in MeOH [10]. Interestingly, the combination of [Pd2(PPh3)4(μ-Cl)2][PF6]2, [H3L][PF6]2 ([H3L][PF6]2 = 3,5-bis(methylimidazolium-1-ylmethyl]-1H-pyrazole bis(hexafluorophosphate)), and 2.5 equivalents of Ag2O does not result in chloride loss, but rather yields [Pd2(PPh3)2(μ-L)2Cl2)][PF6]4 [19]. When two equivalents of Tl[acac] were added to [Pd2((1R,2R)-(PPh2NH)2C6H10)(μ-Cl)2][ClO4]2, the monometallic [Pd((1R,2R)-(PPh2NH)2C6H10)(acac)][ClO4] forms, whereas with two equivalents of Ag[OAc], the product remains a dimer, [Pd2((1R,2R)-(PPh2NH)2C6H10)2(μ-OAc)2][ClO4] [15]. Finally, the reaction of [Pd2(PPh3)4(μ-Cl)2][BF4]2 with sodium propargylglycinate yields [Pd(PPh3)2(propargylglycinate)][BF4] [32].
There have also been limited studies of the catalytic activity of these dimeric species. For the isomerization of 1-octene, the dimeric species [Pd2(PP)2(μ-Cl)2][ClO4]2 (PP = 2 PMePh2 or dppe) were found to possess inferior catalytic activity compared to the corresponding [Pd(PP)(acetone)2][ClO4]2 compounds [33]. That study also found that the same dimers were generally poorer catalysts than the monometallic species for the isomerization and hydrogenation of 1-octene under varying pressures of hydrogen. Finally, the dimer [Pd2(dppe)2(μ-Cl)2][BF4]2 was found to be inactive as a polymerization catalyst, whereas [Pd(dppe)(MeCN)2][BF4]2 was an active catalyst for alkene polymerization and the co-polymerization of alkenes and carbon monoxide [26]. As these dimeric species generally show inferior catalytic activity and can readily form in the presence of species that can be present in catalytic mixtures, for example alkali metal salts [5,6,7], further examination of their reactivity is warranted.
Previous work in this laboratory has focused on the synthesis and reactivity of similar dimeric species with bis(phosphino)metallocene ligands (Figure 1). The first reported dimer of this type was [Pd2(dppf)2(μ-Cl)2][PF6]2 [34,35]. Related compounds with a variety of different substituents on phosphorous were prepared by the addition of Na[BArF24] to [Pd(PP)Cl2] (PP = dppf, dippf, dcpf, and dppdtbpf) [36]. Further work examined dimers with the ruthenium and osmium analogs of dppf [31]. Most recently, the reactivity of [Pd2(dppf)2(μ-Cl)2][BArF24]2 with three monodentate phosphines to yield [Pd(dppf)(PR3)Cl][BArF24] was reported [37]. Herein, additional reactions of dimeric species containing 1,1′-bis(phosphino)ferrocene ligands with monodentate phosphines are reported (Figure 2). The new compounds were all characterized by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy and cyclic voltammetry, and, in several cases, X-ray crystal structures were obtained.

2. Results and Discussion

The synthesis of [Pd2(dfurpf)2(μ-Cl)2][BArF24]2 was performed similarly to that of the related dimers in this study. The addition of Na[BArF24] to a solution of [Pd(dfurpf)Cl2] in CH2Cl2 resulted in an immediate color change from orange to brown–green. A downfield shift in the 31P{1H} NMR signal, typically seen in dimer formation, was noted [36]. The electrochemistry of [Pd2(dfurpf)2(μ-Cl)2][BArF24]2 was examined, and the oxidative electrochemistry displays a single reversible wave at 0.74 V vs. FcH0/+. Oxidation of the neutral dichloride, [Pd(dfurpf)Cl2], occurs at 0.55 V vs. FcH+ [38], and the more positive potential found for the oxidation of the dimeric species is consistent with the dimer being a dication. The potential at which oxidation of the dfurpf dimer occurs is similar to the potential for the most positive oxidative wave for the [Pd2(PP)2(μ-Cl)2][BArF24]2 (PP = dppf (0.74 V), dippf (0.70 V), dcpf (0.73 V), or dppdtbpf (0.74 V)) [36]. The similarity of these is somewhat surprising, as the potentials at which the oxidation of the [Pd(PP)Cl2] compounds (PP = dppf (0.57 V) [39], dippf (0.43 V) [40], dcpf (0.47 V) [41], and dpptdtbpf (0.51 V) [39]) occur show a greater dependence on the substituents on phosphorus. A single, irreversible wave for the reduction of [Pd2(dfurpf)2(μ-Cl)2][BArF24]2 was observed at −0.73 V vs. FcH0/+. The related compounds also displayed a single, irreversible wave, i.e., [Pd2(PP)2(μ-Cl)2][BArF24]2 (PP = dppf (−0.75 V), dippf (−0.95 V), dcpf (−0.82 V), or dppdtbpf (−0.71 V)) [36], which also showed more dependence on the phosphorus substituents than the oxidative wave.
During the course of this investigation, crystals of [Pd2(dppdtbpf)2(μ-Cl)2][BArF24]2 suitable for X-ray analysis were obtained. While there are potentially two different isomers of [Pd2(dppdtbpf)2(μ-Cl)2][BArF24]2 (syn- and anti-), the compound adopts the anti-form in the solid state (Figure 3). The solution NMR data suggest that there is a single isomer present [36], presumably the anti-isomer observed in the solid state. However, the possibility that both isomers do exist in solution as either an undetectable amount of one isomer, fast exchange of both isomers, or coincidental signals for both isomers cannot be ruled out. The structural parameters of [Pd2(dppdtbpf)2(μ-Cl)2][BArF24]2 are quite similar to those for [Pd(dppdtbpf)Cl2] [42] (Table 1). The percent buried volume (%Vbur) is a calculation used to quantify the steric bulk of various ligands [43], and there is an increase in this parameter for the dppdtbpf ligand in [Pd2(dppdtbpf)2(μ-Cl)2][BArF24]2 as compared to [Pd(dfurpf)Cl2]. A similar trend has been noted for the analogous dppf [36], 1,1′-bis(diphenylphosphino)ruthenocene [31] and 1,1′-bis(diphenylphosphino)osmocene [31] compounds. The [Pd2(dppdtbpf)2(μ-Cl)2][BArF24]2 also shows a slight decrease in the P–Pd–P bite angle as compared to [Pd(dppdtbpf)Cl2], but the overall geometries of the palladium centers, as indicated by the four-coordinate geometry indices τ4 [44] and τ′4 [45], are identical.
The addition of two equivalents of a monodentate phosphine to the various [Pd2(PP)2(μ-Cl)2][BArF24]2 dimers typically resulted in an immediate change in the color of the solution from green–brown to orange–red. The single peak in the 31P{1H} spectra for most of the dimers is replaced by three doublets of doublets, two of which exhibit large coupling constants (approx. 500 Hz) indicative of coupling for trans-phosphorus atoms (Table 2). When comparing the same monodentate phosphine, there is an apparent trend in the magnitude of the trans-coupling constants with dfurpf > dppf > dippf > dcpf > dppdtbpf. In the case of [Pd2(dppdtbpf)2(μ-Cl)2][BArF24]2, the dimer exhibits two peaks due to the inequivalent phosphorus atoms, but upon the addition of a monodentate phosphine, this changes to three doublets of doublets (Figure 4). The similarity of dppdtbpf to dippf and dcpf in the ranking of trans-coupling constants suggests that the monodentate phosphines add trans- to the –PtBu2 group. Similarly, the signal for the –PtBu2 group in dppdtbpf occurs approximately 30 ppm downfield compared to peak for the –PPh2 groups in the dppdtbpf and dppf compounds, and this downfield peak displays coupling to the trans-PR3 group.
There were two notable exceptions in which no reaction was observed, and in both cases this can most likely be attributed to steric considerations. The first was the addition of P(o-tol)3 to [Pd2(dppf)2(μ-Cl)2][BArF24]2. The %Vbur of P(o-tolyl)3 is 41.4%, which is significantly larger than P(p-tol)3 (28.2%)[43] and P(m-tol)3 (28.0%) which was calculated from the reported structure [46]. The second was the addition of PPh3 to [Pd2(dcpf)2(μ-Cl)2][BArF24]2. The %Vbur for the [PdCl2(PP)] compounds has been calculated, and dcpf (57.5%) [43] is larger than dippf (56.5%) [43], dppf (55.5%) [43], and dfurpf (53.7%) [47], suggesting that the steric hinderance of the bis(phosphino)ferrocene ligand may prevent a reaction from occurring. The %Vbur for dppdtbpf in [Pd(dppdtbpf)Cl2] has also been calculated (58.2%) [48], and this value suggests that [Pd2(dppdtbpf)2(μ-Cl)2][BArF24]2 may not react with PPh3. However, the %Vbur value for dppdtbpf in these compounds is the exact average of dppf and dtbpf (dtbpf = 1,1′-bis(ditert-butylphosphino)ferrocene, 60.9%) [43], and, thus, the inherent asymmetry in dppdtbpf may provide sufficient access to the palladium center to allow for a reaction with PPh3.
Structures of several of these new compounds with both alkyl and aryl monodentate phosphine ligands were obtained. For the alkylphosphines, the structures of [Pd(PP)(PR3)Cl][BArF24] (PP = dippf or dcpf and PR3 = PMe3; PP = dppf and PR3 = PiPr3) (Figure 5) were determined. In comparing the same monodentate phosphine, PMe3, some general trends can be noted. For the [Pd(PP)Cl2] compounds, the %Vbur values vary by 2%, with dppf being the smallest, followed by dippf (56.5), and then dcpf (57.5) [43]. In the [Pd(PP)(PMe3)Cl][BArF24] compounds, the order of the %Vbur values is dippf (56.6) > dppf (55.1) > dcpf (55.0) (Table 3). Additional structural metrics provide some insight into this discrepancy. The ability of the C5 rings in the 1,1′-bis(phosphino)ferrocene ligands to twist (C–Cent–Cent–C) allow for these ligands to adopt a variety of different conformations [49,50]. The twist angle in [Pd(dppf)(PMe3)Cl][BArF24] is nearly double that of the dippf and dcpf analogues. The bite angles for the dippf and dcpf ligands are within the experimental error of each other and are significantly larger than that of dppf in these compounds. There is also significant distortion at the palladium center, as the palladium in the dppf compound is much closer to the idealized square planar geometry than in the dippf or dcpf analogues. The %Vbur for the PMe3 ligand spans a range of 0.6% in these compounds, suggesting that it is the flexibility of the 1,1′-bis(phosphino)ferrocene ligands that allows for coordination of the monodentate phosphine.
The structure of [Pd(dppf)(PiPr3)Cl][BArF24] allows for comparison of structures in which the bis(phosphino)ferrocene ligand is kept constant while the monodentate phosphine is changed. In comparison to the PMe3 analogue, [Pd(dppf)(PiPr)Cl][BArF24] shows a significant compression (5.8°) of the dppf bite angle. This is accompanied by further distortion from the idealized square planar geometry of palladium. There is also an increase in the deviation from the C5 rings being parallel of 0.5° and a decrease in the twist angle of 3.7°. The %Vbur is significantly smaller compared to similar dppf compounds, as the 52.1% value found for this compound is well outside one standard deviation of the average value of 54.0% found for 61 similar compounds [37].
In addition to the tri-alkyl phosphines, the structures of two new tri-aryl phosphine compounds were determined (Figure 6). Not surprisingly, there are not tremendous differences between the structures of [Pd(dppf)(PPh3)Cl][BArF24] and [Pd(dppf)(P(p-C6H4F)3)Cl][BArF24] (Table 4). The monodentate phosphines were calculated to have the same %Vbur (27.9). The dppf has a slightly larger %Vbur in the P(p-C6H4F)3 compound (56.1 vs. 55.4), the P–Pd–P bite angle decreases by 0.75°, and there is a slightly larger deviation from the ideal square planar geometry for the palladium. For [Pd(dfurpf)(P(p-C6H4CF3)3)Cl][BArF24], the monodentate phosphine has a slightly larger %Vbur, while the dfurpf ligand has a %Vbur that is approximately 4% less than that of dppf in [Pd(dppf)(PPh3)Cl][BArF24]. This is somewhat surprising, as dfurpf only has a 1.5% difference in %Vbur in the corresponding [Pd(PP)Cl2] compounds [47].
The oxidative electrochemistry of the [Pd(PP)(PR3)Cl][BArF24] compounds was examined in CH2Cl2. With the exception of the [Pd(PP)(PPh2Fc)Cl][BArF24] compounds, a single, reversible wave at potentials more positive than that of the corresponding [Pd(PP)Cl2] compounds is observed. Variations in the 1,1′-bis(phosphino)ferrocene ligands have a significant impact on the potential at which oxidation of the [Pd(PP)Cl2] compounds occurs, and a similar trend is noted for the [Pd(PP)(PR3)Cl][BArF24] compounds, wherein alkyl substituents on the 1,1′-bis(phosphino)ferrocene ligands lead to less positive potentials (Table 5). Varying the PR3 group has a minimal effect on the potentials at which oxidations occur, with the various [Pd(PP)(PR3)Cl][BArF24] compounds undergoing oxidation at similar potentials for PMe3 and PPh3 derivatives.
Two waves were observed for the [Pd(PP)(PPh2Fc)Cl][BArF24] compounds, as both iron centers undergo oxidation at significantly different potentials (Figure 7). The separation of the peaks classifies all of these compounds as Class I Robin–Day mixed valence systems with Kc < 102 [51,52]. There was no change in the reversibility of the waves at approximately 0.25 V vs. FcH0/+ when the switching potential was set at 0.55 V. The oxidation at approximately 0.25 V is likely due to the oxidation of the iron center of the PPh2Fc ligand. Free PPh2Fc undergoes oxidation at 0.06 V vs. FcH0/+ [53], which is significantly less positive than the potential, 0.23 V vs. FcH0/+ [54], at which the oxidation of free dppf occurs. Coordination of these ligands leads to a further positive shift in the potentials at which oxidation occurs. For [Pd(dppf)Cl2], oxidization occurs at 0.62 V vs. FcH0/+ [55]. In [Pd(PPh2Fc)2Cl2] the presence of the two iron centers results in two oxidative waves, the first at 0.14 V vs. FcH0/+ and the second at 0.26 V [56]. Based on these compounds, it is reasonable to suggest that for the [Pd(PP)(PPh2Fc)Cl][BArF24] compounds in this study, the oxidation at approximately 0.26 V is likely due to the iron of the PPh2Fc ligand, while the wave at approximately 0.65 V is likely due to oxidation of the iron of the PP ligands. The similarity of the potential for the second oxidation in the [Pd(PP)(PPh2Fc)Cl][BArF24] compounds to that of the lone oxidation for other [Pd(PP)(PR3)Cl][BArF24] compounds is also supportive of this assignment. However, it is somewhat surprising that the second oxidation in these compounds does not occur at even more positive potentials, as the oxidation of the second iron center in [Pd(PPh2Fc)2Cl2] occurs 0.12 V more positive than the first wave [56].
The electrochemistry of several other [Pd(PP)(PR3)Cl][BArF24] compounds, primarily with dppf as the bis(phosphino)ferrocene ligand, was also examined. These compounds display a single reversible wave (Figure 8). The potentials at which the oxidation of these compounds occur are quite narrow for the variety of phosphines employed in this study, indicating that the iron center is somewhat insulated from the effects by small changes in the electron richness and the steric properties of the monodentate phosphine (Table 6).

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General Procedures

All experiments were conducted under an argon atmosphere, employing standard Schlenk techniques, unless otherwise specified. Reagents were used in their as-received form from the manufacturer, except as otherwise indicated. Bis(acetonitrile) palladium dichloride [PdCl2(MeCN)2], triphenylphosphine (PPh3), 1.0 M trimethylphosphine (PMe3) in THF, and tetrabutylammonium hexafluorophosphate [NBu4][PF6] were purchased from Aldrich. The 1,1′-bis(phosphino)ferrocene ligands, ferrocene (FcH), tri-isopropylphoshine, tribenzylphosphine, tri(o-tol)phosphine, tri(m-tol)phosphine, tri(p-tol)phosphine, tri(p-methoxyphenyl)phosphine, tri(p-fluorophenyl)phosphine, and tris(p-trifluoromethylphenyl)phosphine were purchased from Strem. Diphenylphosphinoferrocene (PPh2Fc) [57], Na[BArF24] [58], and the dimers [Pd2(PP)2(μ-Cl)2][BArF24]2 (PP = dppf, dippf, dcpf, or dppdtbpf) [36] were synthesized following the literature methods. Solvents were obtained from Fisher Scientific. The [NBu4][PF6] was dried at 100 °C under vacuum prior to use. FcH was sublimed prior to use. The purification of methylene chloride (CH2Cl2) and diethyl ether (Et2O) was performed using a Solv-Tek purification system [59]. The 31P{1H}, 13C{1H}, 19F {1H}, and 1H NMR spectra were recorded in the reported solvents using a Bruker Avance III HD 400 FT-NMR spectrometer. The 1H and 13C{1H} NMR spectra were referenced to residual solvent peaks. The 31P{1H} NMR spectra were referenced using external 85% H3PO4, and the 19F{1H} NMR spectra were referenced to external C6F6. Elemental analysis was carried out by Midwest Microlab.

3.2. Synthetic Procedures and Characterization

3.2.1. Synthesis of [Pd2(dfurpf)2(μ-Cl)2][BArF24]2

Equal molar amounts of [Pd(dfurpf)Cl2] (0.2100 g, 0.281 mmol) and Na[BArF24] (0.2437 g, 0.281 mmol) were placed in a flask equipped with a stir bar. After placing the solids under an atmosphere of argon, CH2Cl2 (15 mL) was added to the flask. The solution quickly changed color from orange to brown–green, and the reaction was stirred for 15 min. The reaction mixture was then filtered through celite, and the volume of the resulting filtrate was reduced to approximately 5 mL. The solution was then layered with Et2O (20 mL), and the solution was placed in a −10 °C freezer for approximately 3 d, during which time brown–green crystals formed. The resulting solution was filtered, and the solid was washed with Et2O (5 mL) and dried under vacuum. The product was obtained as a green–brown solid (0.6075 g, 96% yield). 1H NMR (CD2Cl2): δ 7.64 (br s, 8H, BArF24), 7.48 (br s, 4H, BArF24), 6.75 (br s, 4H, -furanyl), 6.09 (br s, 4H, -furanyl), 4.55 (AA′XX′, 4H, -C5H4), 4.40 (AA′XX′, 4H, -C5H4), 2.22 (s, 12H, -Me). 13C{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ 161.9 (q, 1JB-C = 49.9 Hz, no DEPT, BArF24), 161.9 (s, no DEPT, -furanyl), 137.9 (d, 1JP-C = 103.2 Hz, no DEPT, -furanyl), 134.9 (m, DEPT +, BArF24), 129.0 (m, no DEPT, BArF24), 127.3 (s, DEPT +, -furanyl), 124.7 (q, 1JF-C = 272.4 Hz, no DEPT, BArF24), 117.6 (m, DEPT +, BArF24), 109.0 (s, DEPT +, -furanyl), 77.3 (s, DEPT +, -C5H4), 76.0 (s, DEPT +, -C5H4), 68.3 (d, 1JP-C = 84.4 Hz, no DEPT, -C5H4), 14.0 (s, DEPT +, -Me). 19F{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ −62.8 (s). 31P{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ 2.7 (s). Anal. Calc. for C124H80B2Cl2F48Fe28P4Pd2: C, 32.28; H, 1.80. Found: C, 32.02; H, 1.64%.

3.2.2. Synthesis of [Pd(PP)(PR3)Cl][BArF24] Compounds

Approximately 100 mg of the appropriate [Pd2(PP)2(μ-Cl)2][BArF24]2 complex was placed in a flask equipped with a stir bar. For air-stable phosphines, two molar equivalents of the desired phosphine were added to the flask, which was then degassed and filled with argon before the CH2Cl2 (10 mL) was added. For air-sensitive phosphines, the flask was degassed, filled with argon, and then CH2Cl2 (10 mL), followed by two molar equivalents of the appropriate phosphine, were added. The reaction was then stirred overnight. The volume of the solution was reduced to approximately 3 mL and then layered with Et2O and placed in a −10 °C freezer for 48 h. The resulting solid was collected by filtration, washed with Et2O, and dried under vacuum.

[Pd(dippf)(PMe3)Cl][BArF24]

The product was isolated as an orange solid in 70% yield. 1H NMR (CD2Cl2) δ: 7.64 (br s, 8H, BArF24), 7.48 (br s, 4H, BArF24), 4.50 (m, 8H, -C5H4), 2.96 (m, 2H, -CHMe2), 2.30 (m, 2H, -CHMe2), 1.65 (d, 2JP-H = 10.4 Hz, 9H, -Me), 1.12 (m, 18H, -CHMe2). 13C{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ 161.7 (q, 1JB-C = 49.9 Hz, no DEPT, BArF24), 134.8 (m, DEPT +, BArF24), 128.8 (m, no DEPT, BArF24), 124.6 (q, 1JF-C = 272.3 Hz, no DEPT, BArF24), 117.5 (m, DEPT +, BArF24), 74.5 (d, 2JP-C = 7.5 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 74.0 (d, 2JP-C = 6.6 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 73.4 (d, 3JP-C = 5.2 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 73.3 (d, 3JP-C = 6.4 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 72.4 (m, no DEPT, -C5H4), 28.0 (d, 1JP-C = 26.2 Hz, -CHMe2), 19.6 (s, DEPT +, -CHMe2), 17.1 (d, 1JP-C = 30.2 Hz, DEPT +, -PCH3). 19F{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ −62.8 (s). 31P{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ 67.7 (dd, 2JP-P = 31.2 and 12.0 Hz, -PiPr2), 57.9 (dd, 2JP-P = 446.1 and 12.0, -PiPr2), −11.0 (dd, 2JP-P = 446.1 and 31.2 Hz, -PMe3). Anal. Calc. for C47H57BClF24FeP3Pd: C, 44.34; H, 4.51. Found: C, 44.22; H, 4.44%.

[Pd(dippf)(PPh3)Cl][BArF24]

The product was isolated as an orange solid in 58% yield. 1H NMR (CD2Cl2) δ: 7.64 (br s, 11H, -Ph and BArF24), 7.54–7.38 (m, 13H, -Ph and BArF24), 7.23 (m, 3H, -Ph), 4.57 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 4.52 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 4.50 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 4.48 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 2.97 (m, 2H, -CHMe2), 2.49 (m, 2H, -CHMe2), 1.18 (m, 18H, -CHMe2). 13C{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ 161.9 (q, 1JB-C = 49.8 Hz, no DEPT, BArF24), 135.4 (d, 3JP-C = 10.1 Hz, DEPT +m -Ph), 134.9 (m, DEPT +, BArF24), 131.9 (d, 4JP-C = 3.0 Hz, DEPT +, -Ph), 131.0 (d, 1JP-C = 47.6 Hz, no DEPT, -Ph), 129.1 (m, no DEPT, BArF24), 128.9 (d, 2JP-C = 10.4 Hz, DEPT +, -Ph), 124.7 (q, 1JF-C = 272.5 Hz, no DEPT, BArF24), 117.6 (m, DEPT +, BArF24), 74.7 (d, 2JP-C = 7.4 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 74.2 (d, 2JP-C = 6.7 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 73.6 (d, 3JP-C = 5.6 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 73.3 (d, 3JP-C = 6.6 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 72.6 (m, no DEPT, -C5H4), 28.2 (d, 1JP-C = 26.5 Hz, DEPT +, -CHMe2), 19.8 (s, DEPT +, -CHMe2). 19F{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ −62.8 (s). 31P{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ 65.5 (dd, 2JP-P = 24.0 and 14.1 Hz, -PiPr2), 62.5 (dd, 2JP-P = 428.1 and 14.1, -PiPr2), 23.7 (dd, 2JP-P = 428.1 and 24.0 Hz, -PPh3). Anal. Calc. for C72H63BClF24FeP3Pd: C, 54.76; H, 4.02. Found: C, 54.87; H, 4.29%.

[Pd(dippf)(PPh2Fc)Cl][BArF24]

The product was isolated as a red–purple solid in 59% yield. 1H NMR (CD2Cl2) δ: 7.83 (br s, 4H, -Ph), 7.65 (br s, 8H, BArF24), 7.46 (m, 6H, -Ph and BArF24), 7.27 (m, 4H, -Ph), 4.57 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 4.52 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 4.48 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 4.45 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 4.41 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 3.97 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 3.94 (s, 5H, Cp), 2.93 (m, 4H, -CHMe2), 1.18 (m, 18H, -CHMe2). 13C{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ 161.9 (q, 1JB-C = 49.9 Hz, no DEPT, BArF24), 134.9 (m, DEPT +, BArF24), 134.8 (d, 1JP-C = 47.5 Hz, no DEPT, -Ph), 133.5 (d, 2JP-C = 19.3 Hz, DEPT +, -Ph), 131.8 (d, 4JP-C = 2.6 Hz, DEPT +, -Ph), 129.0 (m, no DEPT, BArF24), 128.3 (d, 3JP-C = 10.6 Hz, DEPT +, -Ph), 124.7 (q, 1JF-C = 272.5 Hz, no DEPT, BArF24), 117.6 (m, DEPT +, BArF24), 74.6 (d, 3JP-C = 7.1 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 74.3 (d, 1JP-C = 24.5 Hz, no DEPT, -C5H4), 74.2 (d, 3JP-C = 6.8 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 74.1 (d, 1JP-C = 34.9 Hz, no DEPT, -C5H4), 73.5 (d, 3JP-C = 5.5 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 73.3 (d, 2JP-C = 9.8 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 73.1 (d, 2JP-C = 6.2 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 72.9 (d, 1JP-C = 13.4 Hz, no DEPT, -C5H4), 71.7 (d, 2JP-C = 8.4 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 71.4 (s, DEPT +, Cp), 28.0 (d, 1JP-C = 26.5 Hz, DEPT +, -CHMe2), 19.8 (s, DEPT +, -CHMe2). 19F{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ −62.8 (s). 31P{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ 64.1 (dd, 2JP-P = 23.5 and 9.7 Hz, -PiPr2), 58.8 (dd, 2JP-P = 434.6 and 9.7, -PiPr2), 20.0 (dd, 2JP-P = 434.6 and 23.5 Hz, -PPh2Fc). Anal. Calc. for C76H67BClF24Fe2P3Pd: C, 54.10; H, 4.00. Found: C, 54.25; H, 4.11%.

[Pd(dppdtbpf)(PMe3)Cl][BArF24]

The product was isolated as a red solid in 73% yield. 1H NMR (CD2Cl2) δ: 7.96 (m, 4H, -Ph), 7.64 (br s, 8H, BArF24), 7.55 (m, 6H, -Ph), 7.48 (br s, 4H, BArF24), 4.69 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 4.44 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 4.29 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 4.16 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 1.57 (s, 18H, -CMe3), 1.65 (d, 2JP-H = 14.5 Hz, 9H, -PMe3). 13C{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ 161.7 (q, 1JB-C = 49.8 Hz, no DEPT, BArF24), 134.8 (m, DEPT +, BArF24), 134.1 (d, 2JP-C = 13.6 Hz, DEPT +, -Ph), 138.4 (s, DEPT +, -Ph), 132.3 (d, 1JP-C = 50.7 Hz, no DEPT, -Ph), 129.7 (d, 3JP-C = 11.6 Hz, DEPT +, -Ph), 128.9 (m, no DEPT, BArF24), 124.6 (q, 1JF-C = 272.4 Hz, no DEPT, BArF24), 117.5 (m, DEPT +, BArF24), 77.3 (d, 2JP-C = 11.0 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 76.5 (d, 1JP-C = 61.5 Hz, no DEPT, -C5H4), 75.3 (d, 3JP-C = 6.7 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 73.2 (m, DEPT +, -C5H4), 41.0 (d, 1JP-C = 14.3 Hz, no DEPT, -CMe3), 31.6 (s, DEPT +, -CMe3), 14.8 (d, 1JP-C = 33.2 Hz, DEPT +, -PCH3). 19F{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ −62.8 (s). 31P{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ 74.0 (dd, 2JP-P = 430.7 and 5.5 Hz, -PtBu2), 43.5 (dd, 2JP-P = 23.5 and 5.5 Hz, -PPh2), −8.0 (dd, 2JP-P = 430.7 and 23.5 Hz, -PMe3). Anal. Calc. for C65H57BClF24FeP3Pd: C, 52.42; H, 3.86. Found: C, 52.03; H, 3.75%.

[Pd(dppdtbpf)(PPh3)Cl][BArF24]

The product was isolated as a red solid in 98% yield. 1H NMR (CD2Cl2) δ: 8.00–7.05 (m, 37H, -Ph and BArF24), 7.48 (m, 8H, BArF24), 4.94 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 4.59 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 4.33 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 3.63 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 1.75 (d, 3JP-H = 14.7 Hz, 18H, -Me). 13C{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ 161.7 (q, 1JB-C = 49.9 Hz, no DEPT, BArF24), 135.1 (d, 3JP-C = 9.4 Hz, DEPT +, -Ph), 134.8 (m, DEPT +, BArF24), 133.6 (d, 3JP-C = 9.0 Hz, DEPT +, -Ph), 132.5 (d, 4JP-C = 2.8 Hz, DEPT +, -Ph), 130.8 (d, 4JP-C = 2.9 Hz, DEPT +, -Ph), 129.9 (m, no DEPT, -Ph), 129.2 (d, 2JP-C = 11.6 Hz, DEPT +, -Ph), 129.0 (m, no DEPT, -Ph), 128.6 (m, no DEPT, BArF24), 128.2 (d, 2JP-C = 10.4 Hz, DEPT +, -Ph), 124.6 (q, 1JF-C = 272.3 Hz, no DEPT, BArF24), 117.5 (m, DEPT +, BArF24), 77.3 (m, DEPT +, -C5H4), 75.7 (m, no DEPT, -C5H4), 73.3 (m, DEPT +, -C5H4), 42.5 (d, 1JP-C = 15.4 Hz, no DEPT, -CMe3), 32.0 (s, DEPT +, -Me). 19F{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ −62.8 (s). 31P{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ 78.8 (dd, 2JP-P = 423.0 and 6.2 Hz, -PtBu2), 44.1 (dd, 2JP-P = 19.6 and 6.2, -PPh2), 24.2 (dd, 2JP-P = 423.0 and 19.6 Hz, -PPh3). Anal. Calc. for C80H63BClF24FeP3Pd: C, 57.35; H, 3.74. Found: C, 57.12; H, 3.84%.

[Pd(dppdtbpf)(PPh2Fc)Cl][BArF24]

The product was isolated as a red–purple solid in 66% yield. 1H NMR (CD2Cl2) δ: 7.90–6.90 (m, 24H, -Ph and BArF24), 5.25 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 4.74 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 4.42 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 4.38 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 4.17 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 3.75 (s, 5H, Cp), 3.42 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 1.63 (d, 3JP-H = 14.5 Hz, 18H, -Me). 13C{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ 161.9 (q, 1JB-C = 49.7 Hz, no DEPT, BArF24), 134.9 (m, DEPT +, BArF24), 132.5 (s, DEPT +, -Ph), 130.3 (s, no DEPT, -Ph), 129.4 (d, 2JP-C = 11.4 Hz, DEPT +, -Ph), 129.0 (m, no DEPT, BArF24), 127.3 (d, 3JP-C = 10.4 Hz, DEPT +, -Ph), 124.7 (q, 1JF-C = 272.2 Hz, no DEPT, BArF24), 117.6 (m, DEPT +, BArF24), 77.4 (m, DEPT +, -C5H4), 77.1 (m, DEPT +, -C5H4), 75.7 (m, no DEPT, -C5H4), 73.3 (m, DEPT +, -C5H4), 71.4 (s, DEPT +, Cp), 70.8 (m, DEPT +, -C5H4), 42.4 (d, 1JP-C = 14.9 Hz, no DEPT, -CMe3), 32.1 (s, DEPT +, -Me). 19F{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ −62.8 (s). 31P{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ 74.4 (dd, 2JP-P = 429.6 and 6.1 Hz, -PtBu2), 43.0 (dd, 2JP-P = 18.1 and 6.1, -PPh2), 22.8 (dd, 2JP-P = 429.6 and 18.1 Hz, -PPh2Fc). Anal. Calc. for C82H67BClF24Fe2P3Pd: C, 55.98; H, 3.84. Found: C, 56.11; H, 3.93%.

[Pd(dcpf)(PMe3)Cl][BArF24]

The product was isolated as an orange solid in 74% yield. 1H NMR (CD2Cl2) δ: 7.64 (br s, 8H, BArF24), 7.48 (br s, 4H, BArF24), 4.51 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 4.49 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 4.45 (m, 4H, -C5H4), 2.71 (m, 2H, -Cy), 2.03–1.04 (m, 40H, -Cy), 1.68 (d, 2JP-H = 11.1 Hz, 9H, -Me), 1.08 (m, 2H, -Cy). 13C{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ 161.9 (q, 1JB-C = 49.7 Hz, no DEPT, BArF24), 134.9 (m, DEPT +, BArF24), 129.0 (m, no DEPT, BArF24), 124.7 (q, 1JF-C = 272.3 Hz, no DEPT, BArF24), 117.6 (m, DEPT +, BArF24), 77.0 (d, 1JP-C = 10.9 Hz, no DEPT, -C5H4), 76.5 (d, 1JP-C = 10.0 Hz, no DEPT, -C5H4), 74.9 (d, 2JP-C = 7.9 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 74.3 (d, 3JP-C = 6.6 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 73.4 (d, 3JP-C = 5.6 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 73.2 (d, 3JP-C = 6.5 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 39.0 (d, 1JP-C = 38.8 Hz, DEPT + -Cy), 37.8 (d, 1JP-C = 24.4 Hz, DEPT +, -Cy), 31.1 (d, 3JP-C = 11.0 Hz, DEPT -, -Cy), 30.7 (d, 3JP-C = 13.9 Hz, DEPT -, -Cy), 27.5 (dd, JP-C = 28.5 and 13.4 Hz, DEPT -, -Cy), 26.9 (dd, JP-C = 21.4 and 10.7 Hz, DEPT -, -Cy), 26.0 (s, DEPT -, -Cy), 25.6 (s, DEPT -, -Cy), 17.4 (dd, JP-C = 29.9 and 2.6 Hz, DEPT +, -Me). 19F{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ −62.8 (s). 31P{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ 60.6 (dd, 2JP-P = 30.4 and 13.6, -PCy2), 50.2 (dd, 2JP-P = 443.0 and 13.6 Hz, -PCy2), −11.0 (dd, 2JP-P = 443.0 and 30.4 Hz, -PMe3). Anal. Calc. for C69H73BClF24FeP3Pd: C, 53.35; H, 4.74. Found: C, 53.04; H, 4.51%.

[Pd(dfurpf)(PMe3)Cl][BArF24]

The product was isolated as a red–orange solid in 86% yield. 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ: 7.64 (br s, 8H, BArF24), 7.44 (br s, 4H, BArF24), 6.99 (br s, 2H, -furanyl), 6.27 (br s, 2H, -furanyl), 6.12 (br s, 2H, -furanyl), 5.79 (br s, 2H, -furanyl), 4.44 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 4.41 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 4.34 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 3.93 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 2.14 (d, 2JP-H = 15.0 Hz, 9H, -Me), 1.19 (s, 12H, -Me). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3): δ 160.7 (q, 1JB-C = 49.5 Hz, no DEPT, BArF24), 158.3 (d, 1JP-C = 8.1 Hz, no DEPT, -furanyl), 139.0 (m, no DEPT, -furanyl), 133.6 (m, DEPT +, BArF24), 130.5 (d, 3JP-C = 2.9 Hz, DEPT +, -furanyl), 127.9 (m, no DEPT, BArF24), 125.2 (d, 2JP-C = 17.0 Hz, DEPT +, -furanyl), 124.8 (d, 2JP-C = 17.0 Hz, DEPT +, -furanyl), 123.5 (q, 1JF-C = 272.4 Hz, no DEPT, BArF24), 116.4 (m, DEPT +, BArF24), 108.0 (d, 3JP-C = 7.3 Hz, -furanyl), 107.4 (d, 3JP-C = 7.3 Hz, -furanyl), 75.1 (d, 2JP-C = 13.9 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 74.1 (d, 2JP-C = 11.6 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 73.7 (d, 3JP-C = 9.3 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 73.4 (d, 3JP-C = 7.2 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 28.7 (s, DEPT +, furanyl-CH3), 12.8 (d, 1JP-C = 60.1 Hz, DEPT +, -PCH3), 32.1 (s, DEPT +, -Me). 19F{1H} NMR (CDCl3): δ −62.4 (s). 31P{1H} NMR (CDCl3): δ 31.4 (dd, 2JP-P = 493.0 and 15.7, -PPh2), −5.9 (dd, 2JP-P = 15.7 and 12.9 Hz, -P(furanyl)2), −9.4 (dd, 2JP-P = 493.0 and 12.9 Hz, -P(furanyl)2. Anal. Calc. for C65H49BClF24FeO4P3Pd: C, 50.53; H, 3.20. Found: C, 50.34; H, 3.11%.

[Pd(dfurpf)(PPh3)Cl][BArF24]

The product was isolated as a red–orange solid in 57% yield. 1H NMR (CDCl2) δ: 7.65 (br s, 8H, BArF24), 7.50–7.20 (m, 19H, -Ph and BArF24), 6.99 (br s, 2H, -furanyl), 6.33 (br s, 2H, -furanyl), 6.16 (br s, 2H, -furanyl), 5.86 (br s, 2H, -furanyl), 4.44 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 4.39 (AA′XX′, 4H, -C5H4), 4.01 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 2.34 (s, 6H, -Me), 2.01 (s, 6H, -Me). 13C{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ 161.9 (q, 1JB-C = 49.8 Hz, no DEPT, BArF24), 159.8 (d, 1JP-C = 5.9 Hz, no DEPT, -furanyl), 159.7 (d, 1JP-C = 6.6 Hz, no DEPT, -furanyl), 139.9 (m, DEPT +, BArF24), 135.4 (d, 2JP-C = 10.3 Hz, DEPT +, -Ph), 134.9 (s, DEPT +, -furanyl), 134.8 (s, DEPT +, -furanyl), 134.7 (s, DEPT +, -furanyl), 129.0 (m, no DEPT, BArF24), 128.6 (d, 3JP-C = 6.6 Hz, DEPT +, -Ph), 128.5 (s, DEPT +, -furanyl), 128.4 (s, DEPT +, -furanyl), 126.3 (d, 1JP-C = 16.7 Hz, no DEPT, -Ph), 126.0 (s, DEPT +, -Ph), 125.9 (m, DEPT +, -furanyl), 124.7 (q, 1JF-C = 272.2 Hz, no DEPT, BArF24), 117.6 (m, DEPT +, BArF24), 109.2 (s, DEPT +, -furanyl), 109.1 (s, DEPT +, -furanyl), 108.4 (s, DEPT +, -furanyl), 108.3 (s, DEPT +, -furanyl), 76.1 (d, 2JP-C = 13.9 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 75.4 (d, 2JP-C = 11.3 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 74.9 (d, 3JP-C = 9.4 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 74.7 (d, 3JP-C = 7.4 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 74.3 (m, no DEPT, -C5H4), 73.4 (m, no DEPT, -C5H4), 14.0 (s, DEPT +, furanyl-CH3), 13.5 (s, DEPT +, -furanyl-CH3). 19F{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ −62.8 (s). 19F{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ −62.8 (s). 31P{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ 31.8 (dd, 2JP-P = 491.0 and 17.1, -PPh2Fc), −5.8 (dd, 2JP-P = 17.1 and 11.7 Hz, -P(furanyl)2), −9.0 (dd, 2JP-P = 491.0 and 11.7 Hz, -P(furanyl)2). Anal. Calc. for C80H52BClF24FeO4P3Pd: C, 55.94; H, 3.03. Found: C, 56.23; H, 2.94%.

[Pd(dfurpf)(PPh2Fc)Cl][BArF24]

The product was isolated as a dark red solid in 95% yield. 1H NMR (CDCl2) δ: 7.64 (br s, 8H, BArF24), 7.58–7.45 (m, 8H, -Ph and BArF24), 7.39 (t, 2H, JH-H = 7.5 Hz, -Ph), 7.28 (m, 4H, -Ph), 6.97 (br s, 2H, -furanyl), 6.45 (br s, 2H, -furanyl), 6.16 (br s, 2H, -furanyl), 5.89 (br s, 2H, -furanyl), 4.41 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 4.36 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 4.09 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 4.01 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 3.85 (s, 5H, -Cp), 2.36 (s, 6H, -Me), 2.03 (s, 6H, -Me). 13C{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ 161.9 (q, 1JB-C = 50.0 Hz, no DEPT, BArF24), 159.7 (d, 1JP-C = 5.9 Hz, no DEPT, -furanyl), 159.4 (d, 1JP-C = 6.5 Hz, no DEPT, -furanyl), 134.9 (m, DEPT +, BArF24), 134.2 (s, DEPT +, -furanyl), 134.0 (s, DEPT +, -furanyl), 131.4 (s, DEPT +, -furanyl), 129.0 (m, no DEPT, BArF24), 128.2 (s, DEPT +, -furanyl), 128.1 (s, DEPT +, -furanyl), 125.9 (m, DEPT +, -furanyl), 124.7 (q, 1JF-C = 272.6 Hz, no DEPT, FArF24), 117.6 (m, DEPT +, BArF24), 109.1 (s, DEPT +, -furanyl), 109.0 (s, DEPT +, -furanyl), 108.4 (s, DEPT +, -furanyl), 108.3 (s, DEPT +, -furanyl), 75.9 (d, 2JP-C = 9.2 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 75.3 (m, DEPT +, -C5H4), 74.7 (d, 3JP-C = 9.2 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 74.4 (d, 3JP-C = 9.2 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 71.4 (m, no DEPT, -C5H4), 70.7 (s, DEPT +, Cp), 14.0 (s, DEPT +, furanyl-CH3), 13.6 (s, DEPT +, -furanyl-CH3). 19F{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ −62.8 (s). 31P{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ 30.1 (dd, 2JP-P = 500.8 and 15.6, -PPh2Fc), −5.9 (dd, 2JP-P = 17.6 and 15.6 Hz, -P(furanyl)2), −10.6 (dd, 2JP-P = 500.8 and 17.3 Hz, -P(furanyl)2). Anal. Calc. for C84H59BClF24Fe2O4P3Pd: C, 57.77; H, 3.41. Found: C, 57.44; H, 3.42%.

[Pd(dppf)(P(NMe2)3)Cl][BArF24]

The product was isolated as a red solid in 86% yield. 1H NMR (CD2Cl2) δ: 8.06–7.06 (m, 32H, -Ph and BArF24), 4.65 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 4.59 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 4.13 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 3.18 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 2.56 (s, 18H, -Me). 13C{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ 161.9 (q, 1JB-C = 51.1 Hz, no DEPT, BArF24), 134.9 (m, DEPT +, BArF24), 132.4 (s, DEPT +, -Ph), 131.4 (s, DEPT +, -Ph), 128.9 (m, DEPT +, -Ph and BArF24), 124.7 (q, 1JF-C = 272.2 Hz, no DEPT, BArF24), 117.6 (m, DEPT +, BArF24), 77.6 (d, 1JP-C = 12.6 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 76.4 (m, no DEPT, -C5H4), 75.7 (d, 2JP-C = 6.8 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 75.3 (d, 2JP-C = 5.9 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 73.9 (d, 3JP-C = 5.5 Hz, no DEPT, -C5H4), 40.1 (d, 2JP-C = 7.8 Hz, DEPT +, -Me). 19F{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ −62.8 (s). 31P{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ 94.3 (dd, 2JP-P = 607.0 and 10.0 Hz, -P(NMe2)3), 32.2 (dd, 2JP-P = 17.5 and 9.9, -PPh2), 19.0 (dd, 2JP-P = 607.0 and 17.5 Hz, -PPh2). Anal. Calc. for C52H58BClF24FeN3P3Pd: C, 45.39; H, 4.25. Found: C, 45.01; H, 3.99%.

[Pd(dppf)(PiPr3)Cl][BArF24]

The product was isolated as a red solid in 75% yield. 1H NMR (CD2Cl2) δ: 7.73 (dd, JH-H = 11.4 and 7.7 Hz, 4H, -Ph), 7.64 (m, 8H, BArF24), 7.48 (m, 4H, BArF24), 7.45 (m, 12H, -Ph), 7.16 (t, JH-H = 8.2 Hz, -Ph), 4.89 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 4.68 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 4.23 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 3.00 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 2.11 (m, 3H, -CHMe2). 1.17 (d, JH-H = 14.7 Hz, -Me), 1.15 (d, JH-H = 14.7 Hz, -Me). 13C{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ 161.7 (q, 1JB-C = 49.9 Hz, no DEPT, BArF24), 134.7 (m, DEPT +, BArF24), 134.6 (s, DEPT +, -Ph), 134.5 (s, DEPT +, -Ph), 133.4 (d, 1JP-C = 53.5 Hz, no DEPT, -Ph), 132.9 (d, 3JP-C = 2.6 Hz, DEPT +, -Ph), 131.4 (d, 3JP-C = 2.6 Hz, DEPT +, -Ph), 129.0 (m, no DEPT, BArF24), 128.8 (d, 2JP-C = 11.3 Hz, DEPT +, -Ph), 128.6 (d 2JP-C = 10.6 Hz, DEPT +, -Ph), 128.6 (d 2JP-C = 11.6 Hz, DEPT +, -Ph), 124.6 (q, 1JF-C = 272.6 Hz, no DEPT, BArF24), 117.4 (m, DEPT +, BArF24), 79.0 (d, 2JP-C = 13.8 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 76.0 (d, 3JP-C = 8.0 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 75.5 (d, 2JP-C = 8.8 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 74.2 (d, 3JP-C = 5.8 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 68.4 (d, 1JP-C = 46.4Hz, no DEPT, -C5H4), 24.8 (d, 1JP-C = 20.5 Hz, DEPT +, -CHMe2), 20.3 (s, DEPT +, -Me). 19F{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ −62.8 (s). 31P{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ 50.6 (dd, 2JP-P = 450.0 and 17.6 Hz, -PiPr3), 32.7 (dd, 2JP-P = 17.6 and 5.9, -PPh2), 21.6 (dd, 2JP-P = 450.0 and 5.9 Hz, -PPh2). Anal. Calc. for C75H61BClF24FeP3Pd: C, 55.83; H, 3.81. Found: C, 56.02; H, 3.97%.

[Pd(dppf)(P(CH2Ph)3)Cl][BArF24]

The product was isolated as an orange–red solid in 84% yield. 1H NMR (CD2Cl2) δ: 7.86–6.94 (m, 47H, -Ph and BArF24), 4.41 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 4.37 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 3.99 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 3.80 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 2.93 (d, 2JP-H = 9.4 Hz, 6H, -CH2Ph). 13C{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ 161.9 (q, 1JB-C = 50.0 Hz, no DEPT, BArF24), 134.9 (m, DEPT +, BArF24), 134.6 (d, 2JP-C = 10.9 Hz, DEPT +, -Ph), 134.4 (d, 2JP-C = 12.5 Hz, DEPT +, -Ph), 133.2 (m, no DEPT, -Ph), 133.2 (s, DEPT +, -Ph), 132.0 (d, 3JP-C = 2.8 Hz, -Ph), 131.2 (m, no DEPT, -Ph), 130.4 (d, 3JP-C = 5.3 Hz, DEPT +, -Ph), 129.6 (d, 2JP-C = 11.6 Hz, -Ph), 129.4 (d, 3JP-C = 2.2 Hz, DEPT +, -Ph), 129.0 (m, no DEPT, BArF24), 128.8 (d, 2JP-C = 10.8 Hz, DEPT +, -Ph), 128.5 (m, no DEPT, -Ph), 127.9 (d, 3JP-C = 2.9 Hz, -Ph), 124.7 (q, 1JF-C = 272.3 Hz, no DEPT, BArF24), 117.6 (m, DEPT +, BArF24), 77.2 (d, 2JP-C = 12.3 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 76.8 (d, 2JP-C = 10.0 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 75.1 (d, 3JP-C = 2.2 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 75.0 (d, 3JP-C = 4.1 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 69.7 (m, no DEPT, -C5H4), 69.2 (m, no DEPT, -C5H4), 29.4 (dd, J = 19.9 and 2.9 Hz, DEPT -, -CH2Ph). 19F{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ −62.8 (s). 31P{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ 34.0 (dd, 2JP-P = 16.0 and 6.5 Hz, -PPh2), 30.1 (dd, 2JP-P = 452.4 and 6.5, -PPh2), 18.9 (dd, 2JP-P = 452.4 and 16.0 Hz, -PPh3). Anal. Calc. for C87H61BClF24FeP3Pd: C, 59.46; H, 3.50. Found: C, 59.14; H, 3.65%.

[Pd(dppf)(P(m-tolyl)3)Cl][BArF24]

The product was isolated as an orange–red solid in 72% yield. 1H NMR (CD2Cl2) δ: 8.03–7.00 (m, 44H, -Ph, -tol, and BArF24), 4.74 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 4.67 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 4.36 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 3.55 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 2.23 (s, 9H, -CH3). 13C{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ 161.9 (q, 1JB-C = 49.9 Hz, no DEPT, BArF24), 138.6 (s, DEPT +, -Ph), 138.5 (s, DEPT +, -Ph), 134.7 (m, DEPT +, BArF24), 134.2 (m, no DEPT, -Ph), 132.1 (d, 3JP-C = 2.8 Hz, DEPT +, -Ph), 131.7 (d, 3JP-C = 2.6 Hz, DEPT +, -Ph), 131.4 (s, DEPT +, -Ph), 130.5 (m, no DEPT, -Ph), 129.2 (d, 2JP-C = 10.1 Hz, DEPT +, -Ph), 129.0 (m, no DEPT, BArF24), 128.7 (d 2JP-C = 9.8 Hz, DEPT +, -Ph), 128.6 (d 2JP-C = 11.6 Hz, DEPT +, -Ph), 128.2 (m, no DEPT, -Ph), 125.6 (m, DEPT +, -Ph), 124.7 (q, 1JF-C = 272.3 Hz, no DEPT, BArF24), 117.6 (m, DEPT +, BArF24), 77.6 (d, 2JP-C = 12.3 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 76.0 (d, 2JP-C = 12.3 Hz, no DEPT, -C5H4), 76.0 (d, 3JP-C = 8.1 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 75.4 (d, 2JP-C = 8.1 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 74.6 (d, 3JP-C = 6.1 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 21.2 (s, DEPT +, -CH3). 19F{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ −62.9 (s). 31P{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ 35.2 (dd, 2JP-P = 17.5 and 5.8 Hz, -PPh2), 30.2 (dd, 2JP-P = 478.7 and 17.5, -P(m-tol)3), 26.5 (dd, 2JP-P = 478.7 and 5.8 Hz, -PPh2). Anal. Calc. for C87H64BClF24FeP3Pd: C, 59.35; H, 3.66. Found: C, 59.28; H, 3.72%.

[Pd(dppf)(P(p-tolyl)3)Cl][BArF24]

The product was isolated as an orange–red solid in 88% yield. 1H NMR (CD2Cl2) δ: 7.89–6.91 (m, 44H, -Ph, -tol, and BArF24), 4.56 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 4.51 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 4.23 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 3.50 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 2.24 (s, 9H, -CH3). 13C{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ 161.7 (q, 1JB-C = 49.6 Hz, no DEPT, BArF24), 142.3 (s, DEPT +, -Ph), 134.7 (m, DEPT +, BArF24), 134.2 (m, no DEPT, -Ph), 132.1 (d, 3JP-C = 2.8 Hz, DEPT +, -Ph), 131.7 (d, 3JP-C = 2.6 Hz, DEPT +, -Ph), 131.4 (s, DEPT +, -Ph), 130.5 (m, no DEPT, -Ph), 129.2 (d, 2JP-C = 10.1 Hz, DEPT +, -Ph), 129.0 (m, no DEPT, BArF24), 128.7 (d 2JP-C = 9.8 Hz, DEPT +, -Ph), 128.6 (d 2JP-C = 11.6 Hz, DEPT +, -Ph), 128.2 (m, no DEPT, -Ph), 125.6 (m, DEPT +, -Ph), 124.6 (q, 1JF-C = 272.3 Hz, no DEPT, BArF24), 117.5 (m, DEPT +, BArF24), 77.3 (d, 2JP-C = 12.0 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 76.5 (m, no DEPT, -C5H4), 75.8 (d, 3JP-C = 8.2 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 75.2 (d, 2JP-C = 9.7 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 74.4 (d, 3JP-C = 5.6 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 75.2 (m, no DEPT, -C5H4), 21.1 (s, DEPT +, -CH3). 19F{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ −62.8 (s). 31P{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ 35.2 (dd, 2JP-P = 17.6 and 5.9 Hz, -PPh2), 30.3 (dd, 2JP-P = 479.3 and 17.6, -P(p-tol)3), 26.5 (dd, 2JP-P = 479.3 and 5.9 Hz, -PPh2). Anal. Calc. for C87H64BClF24FeP3Pd: C, 59.35; H, 3.66. Found: C, 59.28; H, 3.72%.

[Pd(dppf)(P(p-C6H4OMe)3)Cl][BArF24]

The product was isolated as an orange–red solid in 45% yield. 1H NMR (CD2Cl2) δ: 7.90–6.98 (m, 44H, -Ph, -C6H4OMe, and BArF24), 4.53 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 4.50 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 4.23 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 3.70 (s, 9H, -OCH3), 3.54 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4). 13C{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ 162.2 (d, 4JP-C = 1.5 Hz, no DEPT, -OCH3), 161.9 (q, 1JB-C = 49.8 Hz, no DEPT, BArF24), 136.1 (d, 3JP-C = 4.4 Hz, DEPT +, -Ph), 136.0 (d, 3JP-C = 4.4 Hz, DEPT +, -Ph), 134.9 (m, DEPT +, BArF24), 134.2 (d, 2JP-C = 12.1 Hz, DEPT +, -Ph), 132.3 (d, 3JP-C = 2.9 Hz, DEPT +, -Ph), 131.8 (s, DEPT +, -Ph), 130.8 (m, no DEPT, -Ph), 129.2 (m, no DEPT, BArF24), 128.9 (d, 2JP-C = 3.3 Hz, DEPT +, -Ph), 128.8 (d, 2JP-C = 11.6 Hz, DEPT +, -Ph), 124.7 (q, 1JF-C = 272.3 Hz, no DEPT, BArF24), 120.1 (m, no DEPT, -Ph), 117.6 (m, DEPT +, BArF24), 114.2 (d, 3JP-C = 3.2 Hz, DEPT +, -Ph), 114.1 (d, 3JP-C = 3.4 Hz, DEPT +, -Ph), 77.3 (d, 2JP-C = 12.1 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 76.0 (d, 3JP-C = 6.8 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 75.3 (d, 2JP-C = 8.2 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 74.5 (d, 3JP-C = 5.0 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 69.8 (m, no DEPT, -C5H4), 69.1 (m, no DEPT, -C5H4), 68.2 (s, DEPT +, -OCH3). 19F{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ −62.8 (s). 31P{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ 50.5 (dd, 2JP-P = 451.9 and 17.7 Hz, -P(p-C6H4OMe)3), 32.6 (dd, 2JP-P = 17.7 and 6.3, -PPh2), 21.6 (dd, 2JP-P = 451.9 and 6.3 Hz, -PPh2). Anal. Calc. for C87H64BClF24FeO3P3Pd: C, 57.78; H, 3.57. Found: C, 58.09; H, 3.71%.

[Pd(dppf)(P(p-C6H4F)3)Cl][BArF24]

The product was isolated as an orange–red solid in 75% yield. 1H NMR (CD2Cl2) δ: 7.90–6.78 (m, 44H, -Ph, -C6H4F, and BArF24), 4.48 (m, 4H, -C5H4), 4.28 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4), 3.69 (AA′XX′, 2H, -C5H4). 13C{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ 163.6 (d, 1JF-C = 248.6 Hz, no DEPT, CF), 161.9 (q, 1JB-C = 49.6 Hz, no DEPT, BArF24), 134.9 (m, DEPT +, BArF24), 133.9 (d, 2JP-C = 12.2 Hz, DEPT +, -Ph), 132.9 (m, DEPT +, -Ph), 132.2 (s, DEPT +, -Ph), 131.8 (s, DEPT +, -Ph), 130.1 (m, no DEPT, -Ph), 129.2 (m, no DEPT, BArF24), 128.9 (d, 2JP-C = 3.3 Hz, DEPT +, -Ph), 128.8 (m, no DEPT +, -Ph), 124.7 (q, 1JF-C = 272.2 Hz, no DEPT, BArF24), 124.3 (m, no DEPT, -Ph), 117.6 (m, DEPT +, BArF24), 116.3 (dd, J = 21.9 and 7.5 Hz, DEPT +, -Ph), 115.9 (dd, J = 21.1 and 7.5 Hz, DEPT +, -Ph), 77.1 (d, 2JP-C = 11.9 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 76.5 (m, no DEPT, -C5H4), 76.2 (d, 3JP-C = 6.8 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 75.9 (m, no DEPT, -C5H4), 75.6 (d, 2JP-C = 8.2 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 74.9 (d, 3JP-C = 5.9 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4). 19F{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ −62.8 (s, BArF24), −106.7 (s, -C6H4F). 31P{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ 36.5 (dd, 2JP-P = 18.2 and 6.4 Hz, -PPh2), 30.4 (dd, 2JP-P = 486.7 and 6.4, -P(p-C6H4F)3), 26.1 (dd, 2JP-P = 486.7 and 18.2 Hz, -PPh2). Anal. Calc. for C84H55BClF27FeP3Pd: C, 56.92; H, 3.13. Found: C, 57.07; H, 3.01%.

[Pd(dfurpf)(P(p-C6H4CF3)3)Cl][BArF24]

The product was isolated as an orange–red solid in 67% yield. 1H NMR (CDCl2) δ: 7.64 (br s, 8H, BArF24), 7.58–7.32 (m, 16H, -C6H4CF3 and BArF24), 6.96 (br s, 2H, -furanyl), 6.47 (br s, 2H, -furanyl), 6.19 (br s, 2H, -furanyl), 5.94 (br s, 2H, -furanyl), 4.45 (m, 4H, -C5H4), 4.22 (m, 4H, -C5H4), 2.33 (s, 6H, -Me), 2.08 (s, 6H, -Me). 13C{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ 161.7 (q, 1JB-C = 49.8 Hz, no DEPT, BArF24), 160.3 (d, 1JP-C = 6.1 Hz, no DEPT, -furanyl), 159.9 (d, 1JP-C = 6.5 Hz, no DEPT, -furanyl), 139.6 (m, DEPT +, BArF24), 135.0 (d, 2JP-C = 11.4 Hz, DEPT +, -Ph), 134.2 (s, DEPT +, -furanyl), 134.0 (s, DEPT +, -furanyl), 133.5 (s, DEPT +, -furanyl), 132.6 (d, 1JP-C = 48.3 Ha, no DEPT, -Ph), 131.2 (q, 1JF-C = 32.51 Hz, no DEPT, -CF3), 128.8 (m, no DEPT, BArF24), 126.5 (d, 3JP-C = 16.4 Hz, DEPT +, -Ph), 126.3 (s, DEPT +, -furanyl), 126.1 (s, DEPT +, -furanyl), 125.6 (m, DEPT +, -furanyl), 124.6 (s, DEPT +, -Ph), 124.6 (q, 1JF-C = 272.4 Hz, no DEPT, BArF24), 122.9 (d, 1JP-C = 74.3 Hz, no DEPT, -Ph), 117.5 (m, DEPT +, BArF24), 109.5 (s, DEPT +, -furanyl), 109.4 (s, DEPT +, -furanyl), 108.7 (s, DEPT +, -furanyl), 108.7 (s, DEPT +, -furanyl), 75.9 (d, 2JP-C = 12.7 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 75.7 (d, 2JP-C = 14.0 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 75.2 (d, 3JP-C = 9.5 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 75.1 (d, 3JP-C = 8.1 Hz, DEPT +, -C5H4), 72.4 (m, no DEPT, -C5H4), 69.2 (m, no DEPT, -C5H4), 13.9 (s, DEPT +, furanyl-CH3), 13.5 (s, DEPT +, -furanyl-CH3). 19F{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ −62.8 (s, BArF24), −63.7 (s, -CF3). 19F{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ −62.8 (s). 31P{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ 28.0 (dd, 2JP-P = 495.2 and 19.6, -P(p-C6H4CF3)3), −5.2 (dd, 2JP-P = 19.6 and 6.0 Hz, -P(furanyl)2), −6.4 (dd, 2JP-P = 495.2 and 6.0 Hz, -P(furanyl)2). Anal. Calc. for C83H52BClF33FeO4P3Pd: C, 51.51; H, 2.71. Found: C, 51.14; H, 2.94%.

3.3. Electrochemical Methods

Cyclic voltammetry was performed using a CH Instruments Model CHI620D potentiostat. The experiments took place under an argon atmosphere in 10.0 mL of CH2Cl2 at a temperature of 21 ± 1 °C. The supporting electrolyte, [NBu4][PF6], was 0.1 M, and initial background scans were conducted prior to introducing the analyte, which was present at a concentration of 1.0 mM. A non-aqueous Ag/AgCl reference electrode, separated from the solution by a porous frit, was employed. The working electrode consisted of a glassy carbon electrode, polished with 1.0 μm and 0.25 μm diamond paste and rinsed with CH2Cl2 before use. The counter–electrode was a Pt wire. Data acquisition occurred at scan rates ranging from 100 to 1000 mV/s in 100 mV increments, with all reported data at 100 mV/s; background subtraction was employed. Following each experiment, the internal reference FcH0/+ was introduced at the same concentration as the analyte.

3.4. X-ray Crystallography

Crystals of all compounds were grown by vapor diffusion of diethyl ether into a solution of the corresponding compound in CH2Cl2. The single crystal X-ray diffraction studies were carried out on a Rigaku XtaLab Mini II (Tokyo, Japan) diffractometer equipped with Mo Kα radiation (λ = 0.71073 A°) and a HyPixBantam (Rigaku/Oxford Diffraction, Tokyo, Japan) hybrid photon–counting (HPC) detector. The crystal was mounted on a MiTeGen Micromount with paratone oil. Data were collected in a nitrogen gas stream at 100(2) K using ϕ and ω scans. Additional experimental parameters can be found in the supporting information. Data collection strategies and data processing were performed using CrysAlisPro (v43, Rigaku/Oxford Diffraction, Tokyo, Japan) [60]. The data were integrated and scaled within the Rigaku CrysAlisPro software package. Structure solution and refinement were carried out within the Olex2-1.5 software package [61]. Solution by direct methods (SHELXT [62]) produced a complete phasing model for refinement. All nonhydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically using full-matrix least-squares on F2 (SHELXL-2014 [63]). Hydrogen atoms were placed using a riding model, with positions constrained relative to their parent atom using the appropriate HFIX command in SHELXL-2014.

4. Conclusions

The addition of monodentate phosphines to the dimeric species, [Pd2(PP)2(μ-Cl)2][BArF24]2 (PP = 1,1′-bis(phosphino)ferrocene ligands) typically results in cleavage of the dimer and the formation of [Pd(PP)(PR3)Cl][BArF24] compounds. These reactions are readily observed visually be the solutions changing color from green–brown to orange–red. The 31P{1H} NMR spectra confirm the presence of three inequivalent phosphorus atoms with a strong trans-coupling of approximately 500 Hz noted for two of the signals. The magnitude of these coupling constants varies based on the PP ligands, with dfurpf > dppf > dippf > dcpf > dppdtbpf. With especially bulky PP or PR3 ligands, no reaction was observed. The structures of several of these new compounds provide insight into how the conformational flexibility of the 1,1′-bis(phosphino)ferrocene ligands allows for binding of the monodentate phosphines. The oxidative electrochemistry of most of the [Pd(PP)(PR3)Cl][BArF24] compounds show one reversible oxidation. The potential at which the oxidation occurs shows dependence on the phosphorus substituents on the 1,1′-bis(phosphino)ferrocene ligands, but the range of potentials, 0.10 V, is less than was observed for the analogous [Pd(PP)Cl2] compounds, 0.14 V. The potential at which oxidation of these compounds occurs shows a dependence on the PR3 ligand, but with a somewhat limited range of 0.07 V for a variety of different monodentate phosphines, suggesting minimal communication between the iron center of the 1,1′-bis(phosphino)ferrocene ligand and the monodentate phosphine. This is especially apparent in the [Pd(PP)(PPh2Fc)Cl][BArF24] compounds, which display two oxidative waves. The wave at less positive potentials is attributed to the PPh2Fc ligand, while the wave at higher potentials is attributed to the PP ligand. This second wave is formally due to the oxidation of [Pd(PP)(PPh2Fc+)Cl][BArF24], yet the presence of the PPh2Fc+ ligand does not significantly impact the potential at which oxidation of the PP ligand occurs with respect to other PR3 ligands.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules29092047/s1: CCDC 2340750-2340755 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for the [Pd2(dppdtbpf)2(μ-Cl)2][BArF24]2 and [Pd(PP)(PR3)Cl][BArF24] (PP = dppf, PR3 = PiPr3 or P(p-C6H4F)3; PP = dippf or dcpf, PR3 = PMe3; PP = dfurpf, PR3 = P(p-C6H4CF3)3) compounds. These data can be obtained free of charge via http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/conts/retrieving.html, or from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK; fax: (+44) 1223-336-033; or e-mail: [email protected]. The following supporting information can be downloaded: 31P{1H} NMR spectra, crystallographic experimental details, %Vbur results, and CV scans for all compounds.

Author Contributions

Synthesis and characterization, I.S.L., V.P., N.D., K.J.K. and S.A.W.; writing—original draft preparation, C.N.; writing—review and editing, I.S.L. and J.E.S.; X-ray structure determination, J.E.S. and C.N.; funding acquisition, C.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

I.S.L.: V.P. and C.N. acknowledge the Academic Research Committee at Lafayette College for funding through the EXCEL scholar program. N.D. and C.N. thank the American Chemical Society Project SEED program for funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

We thank the McCutcheon Foundation for partial support in the purchase of the X-ray diffractometer.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Nataro, C. Ferrocene: To infinity and back again. In Comprehensive Coordination Chemistry III: From Biology to Nanotechnology; Constable, E., Parkin, G., Que, L., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; Volume 5, pp. 572–656. ISBN 978-0-12-409547-2. [Google Scholar]
  2. Clark, H.C.; Dixon, K.R.; Jacobs, W.J. Cationic carbonyls of platinum, palladium, and nickel. Chem. Commun. 1968, 2, 93–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Clark, H.C.; Dixon, K.R. Chemistry of metal hydrides. IV. Synthesis of platinum and palladium cations [MX(CO)(R3P)2]+ and [MX(R3P)3]+. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1969, 91, 596–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hursthouse, M.B.; Kelly, D.G.; Light, M.E.; Toner, A.J. CP/MAS NMR and X-ray crystallographic characterization of trans-PdX2(PPh2vinyl)2 (X = Cl, I);UV and Et2O·BF3 reaction studies, including the formation of [Pd(μ-Cl)(PPh2vinyl)2]2[BF4]2. Can. J. Chem. 2000, 78, 1073–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Smith, R.C.; Protasiewicz, J.D. A trans-spanning diphosphine ligand based on a m—Terphenyl scaffold and its palladium and nickel complexes. Organometallics 2004, 23, 4215–4222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fairlamb, I.J.S.; Grant, S.; Tommasi, S.; Lynam, J.M.; Bandini, M.; Dong, H.; Lin, Z.; Whitwood, A.C. Phosphinite ligand effects in palladium(II)-catalysed cycloisomerisation of 1,6-dienes: Bicyclo [3.2.0]heptanyl diphosphinite (B [3.2.0]DPO) ligands exhibit flexible bite angles, an effect derived from conformational changes (exo—Or endo-envelope) in the bicyclic ligand scaffold. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2006, 348, 2515–2530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Siu, P.W.; Gates, D.P. M[P(1,2-O2C6H4)3] (M = K or Na)—Synthesis, characterization, and use in halide abstraction. Can. J. Chem. 2012, 90, 574–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, Q.-S.; Wan, C.-Q.; Xu, F.-B.; Song, H.-B.; Zhang, Z.-Z. Synthesis of a novel pyridine-diamino bridged diphosphine ligand and its macrocyclic metal complexes. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2005, 358, 2283–2291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Davies, J.A.; Hartley, F.R.; Murray, S.G. Hard ligands as donors to soft metals. Part 1. Formation of oxygen-bonded dimethyl sulphoxide complexes of palladium(II) and platinum(II) promoted by steric crowding. J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1979, 11, 1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Longato, B.; Pilloni, G.; Valle, G.; Corain, B. Synthesis and solvolytic behavior of cis-[1,1′-bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene]platinum(II) and -palladium(II) complexes. X-ray structure of bis-(μ-hydroxy)bis[1,1′-bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene]diplatinum(II) tetrafluoroborate. Inorg. Chem. 1988, 27, 956–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kumar, J.S.; Singh, A.K.; Yang, J.; Drake, J.E. Di-μ-chlorobis[1,2-bis(diphenylphosphino)ethanepalladium(II)]: Synthesis and crystal structure. J. Coord. Chem. 1998, 44, 335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Badía, A.; Navarro, R.; Urriolabeitia, E.P. Synthesis and structure of PdII and PtII complexes containing chiral diphosphazane ligands. J. Organomet. Chem. 1998, 554, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Schmidt, U.; Ilg, K.; Werner, H. The first palladium(II) complexes containing arsino(phosphino)methanes as ligands. J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 2000, 7, 1005–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Neo, Y.C.; Yeo, J.S.L.; Low, P.M.N.; Chien, S.W.; Mak, T.C.W.W.; Vittal, J.J.; Hor, T.S.A.A. Isolation and structural characterization of some stable Pd(II) carboxylate complexes supported by 1,1′-bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene (dppf). J. Organomet. Chem. 2002, 658, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bravo, J.; Cativiela, C.; Chaves, J.E.; Navarro, R.; Urriolabeitia, E.P. 31P NMR spectroscopy as a powerful tool for the determination of enantiomeric excess and absolute configurations of α-amino acids. Inorg. Chem. 2003, 42, 1006–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Li, C.; Pattacini, R.; Graff, R.; Braunstein, P. Diphosphinite AgI and PdII dinuclear complexes as adaptable anion receptors: An unprecedented bridging mode for the PF6− ion. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 6856–6859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Li, C.; Pattacini, R.; Braunstein, P. A fluorene-based diphosphinite ligand, its Ni, Pd, Pt, Fe, Co and Zn complexes and the first structurally characterized diphosphinate metal chelates. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2010, 363, 4337–4345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Xiao, X.-Q.; Jin, G.-X. Reactivity differences between nickel and palladium complexes bearing 1,2-diphosphino-1,2-dicarba-dodecaborane ligand. J. Organomet. Chem. 2011, 696, 504–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Reindl, S.A.; Pöthig, A.; Hofmann, B.; Herrmann, W.A.; Kühn, F.E. Dinuclear palladium complexes of pyrazolato-bridged imidazolium- and NHC-ligands: Synthesis and characterization. J. Organomet. Chem. 2015, 775, 130–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ahn, H.; Son, I.; Lee, J.; Lim, H.J. Palladium-hydride-catalyzed regiodivergent isomerization of 1-alkenes. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2017, 6, 335–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kunchur, H.S.; Radhakrishna, L.; Pandey, M.K.; Balakrishna, M.S. Novel approach to benzo-fused 1,2-azaphospholene involving a Pd(II)-assisted tandem P–C bond cleavage and P–N bond formation reaction. Chem. Commun. 2021, 57, 4835–4838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Tay, D.W.P.; Nobbs, J.D.; Aitipamula, S.; Britovsek, G.J.P.; Van Meurs, M. Directing Selectivity to aldehydes, alcohols, or esters with diphobane ligands in Pd-catalyzed alkene carbonylations. Organometallics 2021, 40, 1914–1925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ritter, F.; John, L.; Schindler, T.; Schroers, J.P.; Teeuwen, S.; Tauchert, M.E. Evaluation of Pd→B interactions in diphosphinoborane complexes and impact on inner-sphere reductive elimination. Chem. Eur. J. 2020, 26, 13436–13444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Brown, M.D.; Levason, W.; Reid, G.; Watts, R. Synthesis spectroscopic and structural properties of transition metal complexes of the O-xylyl diphosphine o-C6H4(CH2PPh2)2. Polyhedron 2005, 24, 75–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Devic, T.; Batail, P.; Fourmigué, M.; Avarvari, N. Unexpected reactivity of PdCl2 and PtCl2 complexes of the unsaturated diphosphine o-Me2TTF(PPh2)2 toward chloride abstraction with thallium triflate. Inorg. Chem. 2004, 43, 3136–3141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Abu-Surrah, A.S.; Klinga, M.; Repo, T.; Leskela, M.; Debaerdemaeker, T.; Rieger, B. Inhibition of a palladium(II) catalyst upon formation of a di-μ-chloro complex: Di-μ-chloro-bis[1,2-bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane-P,P′]dipalladium(II) bis(tetrafluoroborate) bis(deuterochloroform) solvate. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. C Cryst. Struct. Commun. 2000, C56, e44–e45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Leone, A.; Gischig, S.; Consiglio, G. Carbonylation studies of Pd-methyl complexes modified with 1,4-Cs-symmetrical diphosphine ligands. J. Organomet. Chem. 2006, 691, 4816–4828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sava, X.; Ricard, L.; Mathey, F.; Le Floch, P. Di- and tetranuclear palladium complexes incorporating phospha- and diphosphaferrocenes as ligands. Chem. Eur. J. 2001, 7, 3159–3166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Davies, J.A.; Hartley, F.R.; Murray, S.G. Hard ligands as donors to soft metals. 2. Cationic monomeric and dimeric complexes of palladium(II) and platinum(II): Towards the isolation of weakly bonded species. Inorg. Chem. 1980, 19, 2299–2303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Parkin, G. 1.01—Classification of organotransition metal compounds. In Comprehensive Organometallic Chemistry III; Mingos, D.M.P., Crabtree, R.H., Eds.; Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2007; pp. 1–57. ISBN 978-0-08-045047-6. [Google Scholar]
  31. Warnick, E.P.; Dupuis, R.J.; Piro, N.A.; Kassel, W.S.; Nataro, C. Compounds containing weak, non-covalent interactions to the metal in the backbone of 1,1′-bis(phosphino)metallocene ligands. Polyhedron 2016, 114, 156–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ponikwar, W.; Hauck, T.; Beck, W. Metallkomplexe mit biologisch wichtigen liganden. CLXIII N,O-chelatkomplexe mit propargylglycinat. Z. Anorg. Allge. Chem. 2006, 632, 1983–1985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hartley, F.R.; Murray, S.G.; Wilkinson, A. Palladium(II) and Platinum(II) containing monodentate tertiary phosphine ligands. Inorg. Chem. 1989, 28, 549–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Huang, Z.-H.; Huang, Z.-X.; Zhang, H.-H. Crystal structure of binuclear bridging complex [(dppf)2PdII2(μ-Cl)2][PF6]2. Jiegou Huaxue 1997, 16, 324–327. [Google Scholar]
  35. Huang, Z.-H. Synthesis, characterization and CV study of polynuclear bridged complex [(dppf)2Pd(II)2(μ-Cl)2][PF6]2·CHCl3. Hecheng Huaxue 1999, 7, 275–281. [Google Scholar]
  36. Gramigna, K.M.; Oria, J.V.; Mandell, C.L.; Tiedemann, M.A.; Dougherty, W.G.; Piro, N.A.; Kassel, W.S.; Chan, B.C.; Diaconescu, P.L.; Nataro, C. Palladium(II) and platinum(II) compounds of 1,1′-bis(phosphino)metallocene (M = Fe, Ru) ligands with metal-metal interactions. Organometallics 2013, 32, 5966–5979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wolfarth, S.A.; Colicchio, N.G.; Nataro, C.S.; Reinheimer, E.W.; Nataro, C. Cleavage of the dimeric heterometallic complexes [Pd(dppf)(μ-Cl)]2[BArF24]2 (dppf = 1,1′-bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene, BArF24 = tetrakis(bis-3,5-trifluoromethylphenyl)borate) via addition of monodentate phosphine ligands. Polyhedron 2022, 222, 115915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hendricks, M.E.; Xu, X.; Boller, T.R.; Samples, E.M.; Johnson, A.R.; Nataro, C. Synthesis, characterization and electrochemistry of [Pd(PP)MeCl] compounds with 1,1′-bis(phosphino)ferrocene ligands. Polyhedron 2021, 199, 115104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kahn, S.L.; Breheney, M.K.; Martinak, S.L.; Fosbenner, S.M.; Seibert, A.R.; Kassel, W.S.; Dougherty, W.G.; Nataro, C. Synthesis, characterization, and electrochemistry of compounds containing 1-diphenylphosphino-1′-(di-tert-butylphosphino)ferrocene (dppdtbpf). Organometallics 2009, 28, 2119–2126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ong, J.H.L.; Nataro, C.; Golen, J.A.; Rheingold, A.L. Electrochemistry of late transition metal complexes containing the ligand 1,1′-bis(diisopropylphosphino)ferrocene (dippf). Organometallics 2003, 22, 5027–5032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hagopian, L.E.; Campbell, A.N.; Golen, J.A.; Rheingold, A.L.; Nataro, C. Synthesis and electrochemistry of late transition metal complexes containing 1,1′-bis(dicyclohexylphosphino)ferrocene (dcpf). The X-ray structure of [PdCl2(dcpf)] and Buchwald-Hartwig catalysis using [PdCl2(Bisphosphinometallocene)] precursors. J. Organomet. Chem. 2006, 691, 4890–4900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Trivedi, M.; Ujjain, S.K.; Singh, G.; Kumar, A.; Dubey, S.K.; Rath, N.P. Syntheses, characterization, and electrochemistry of compounds containing 1-Diphenylphosphino-1′-(di-tert-butylphosphino)ferrocene (dppdtbpf). J. Organomet. Chem. 2014, 772–773, 202–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Clavier, H.; Nolan, S.P. Percent buried volume for phosphine and N-heterocyclic carbene ligands: Steric properties in organometallic chemistry. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 841–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Yang, L.; Powell, D.R.; Houser, R.P. Structural variation in copper(I) complexes with pyridylmethylamide ligands: Structural analysis with a new four-coordinate geometry index, t4. Dalton Trans. 2007, 9, 955–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Okuniewski, A.; Rosiak, D.; Chojnacki, J.; Becker, B. Coordination polymers and molecular structures among complexes of mercury(II) halides with selected 1-benzoylthioureas. Polyhedron 2015, 90, 47–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sterkhova, I.V.; Smirnov, V.I.; Malysheva, S.F.; Kuimov, V.A.; Belogorlova, N.A. Molecular and crystal structures of tris(3-methylphenyl)phosphine and its chalcogenides. J. Mol. Struct. 2019, 1197, 681–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mandell, C.L.; Kleinbach, S.S.; Dougherty, W.G.; Kassel, W.S.; Nataro, C. Electrochemistry of 1,1′-bis(2,4-dialkylphosphetanyl)ferrocene and 1,1′-bis(2,5-dialkylphospholanyl)ferrocene ligands: Free phosphines, metal complexes, and chalcogenides. Inorg. Chem. 2010, 49, 9718–9727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Hartlaub, S.F.; Lauricella, N.K.; Ryczek, C.N.; Furneaux, A.G.; Melton, J.D.; Piro, N.A.; Kassel, W.S.; Nataro, C. Late transition metal compounds with 1,1′-bis(phosphino)ferrocene ligands. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2017, 2017, 424–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Gan, K.-S.; Hor, T.S.A. 1,1′-Bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene—Coordination chemistry, organic synthesis and catalysis. In Ferrocenes: Homogeneous Catalysis, Organic Synthesis, Materials Science; Togni, A., Hayashi, T., Eds.; VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 1995; pp. 3–104. [Google Scholar]
  50. Bandoli, G.; Dolmella, A. Ligating ability of 1,1′-bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene: A structural survey (1994–1998). Coord. Chem. Rev. 2000, 209, 161–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Demadis, K.D.; Hartshorn, C.M.; Meyer, T.J. The localized-to-delocalized transition in mixed-valence chemistry. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 2655–2685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Ventura, K.; Smith, M.B.; Prat, J.R.; Echegoyen, L.E.; Villagrán, D. Introducing students to inner sphere electron transfer concepts through electrochemistry studies in diferrocene mixed-valence systems. J. Chem. Educ. 2017, 94, 526–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kotz, J.C.; Nivert, C.L.; Lieber, J.M.; Reed, R.C. Organometallic ligands. II. Coordination chemistry of 1-[(dimethylamino)methyl]-2-(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene. J. Organomet. Chem. 1975, 84, 255–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Corain, B.; Longato, B.; Favero, G.; Ajo, D.; Pilloni, G.; Russo, U.; Kreissl, F.R. Heteropolymetallic complexes of 1,1′-dis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene (dppf). III. Comparative physicochemical properties of (dppf)MCl2 (M = cobalt, nickel, palladium, platinum, zinc, cadmium, mercury). Inorg. Chim. Acta 1989, 157, 259–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Nataro, C.; Campbell, A.N.; Ferguson, M.A.; Incarvito, C.D.; Rheingold, A.L. Group 10 metal compounds of 1,1′-bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene (dppf) and 1,1′-bis(diphenylphosphino)ruthenocene: A structural and electrochemical investigation. X-ray structures of [MCl2(dppr)] (M=Ni, Pd). J. Organomet. Chem. 2003, 673, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Milde, B.; Lohan, M.; Schreiner, C.; Rueffer, T.; Lang, H. (Metallocenylphosphane)palladium dichlorides—Synthesis, electrochemistry and their application in C-C coupling reactions. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2011, 2011, 5437–5449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Tlili, A.; Voituriez, A.; Marinetti, A.; Thuery, P.; Cantat, T. Synergistic effects in ambiphilic phosphino-borane catalysts for the hydroboration of CO2. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 7553–7555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Yakelis, N.A.; Bergman, R.G. Safe preparation and purification of sodium tetrakis[(3,5-trifluoromethyl)phenyl]borate (NaBArF24): Reliable and sensitive analysis of water in solutions of fluorinated tetraarylborates. Organometallics 2005, 24, 3579–3581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Pangborn, A.B.; Giardello, M.A.; Grubbs, R.H.; Rosen, R.K.; Timmers, F.J. Safe and convenient procedure for solvent purification. Organometallics 1996, 15, 1518–1520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Diffraction, R.O. CrysAlisPro, version 43_32.111a; Agilent Technologies: Yarnton, UK, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  61. Dolomanov, O.V.; Bourhis, L.J.; Gildea, R.J.; Howard, J.A.K.; Puschmann, H. OLEX2: A Complete structure solution, refinement and analysis program. J. Appl. Cryst. 2009, 42, 339–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Sheldrick, G.M. SHELXT—Integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A Found. Adv. 2015, 71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Sheldrick, G.M. Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. C Cryst. Struct. Commun. 2015, 71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 29 02047 g001
Figure 1. 1,1′-Bis(phosphino)ferrocene ligands employed in this study.
Figure 1. 1,1′-Bis(phosphino)ferrocene ligands employed in this study.
Molecules 29 02047 g001
Molecules 29 02047 g002
Figure 2. Synthesis of [Pd(PP)(PR3)Cl][BArF24] compounds.
Figure 2. Synthesis of [Pd(PP)(PR3)Cl][BArF24] compounds.
Molecules 29 02047 g002
Molecules 29 02047 g003
Figure 3. Structure of [Pd2(dppdtbpf)2(μ-Cl)2][BArF24]2. Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level and the H atoms and two [BArF24]− are omitted for clarity.
Figure 3. Structure of [Pd2(dppdtbpf)2(μ-Cl)2][BArF24]2. Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level and the H atoms and two [BArF24]− are omitted for clarity.
Molecules 29 02047 g003
Molecules 29 02047 g004
Figure 4. 31P{1H} NMR spectrum of [Pd(dppdtbpf)(PPh3)Cl][BArF24] in CDCl2. Expanded views of each signal are inset.
Figure 4. 31P{1H} NMR spectrum of [Pd(dppdtbpf)(PPh3)Cl][BArF24] in CDCl2. Expanded views of each signal are inset.
Molecules 29 02047 g004
Molecules 29 02047 g005
Figure 5. Structures of [Pd(PP)(PR3)Cl][BArF24] (PP = dippf or dcpf and PR3 = PMe3; PP = dppf and PR3 = PiPr3). Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level, and the H atoms, [BArF24]−, and any solvent molecules are omitted for clarity.
Figure 5. Structures of [Pd(PP)(PR3)Cl][BArF24] (PP = dippf or dcpf and PR3 = PMe3; PP = dppf and PR3 = PiPr3). Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level, and the H atoms, [BArF24]−, and any solvent molecules are omitted for clarity.
Molecules 29 02047 g005
Molecules 29 02047 g006
Figure 6. Structures of [Pd(PP)(PR3)Cl][BArF24] (PP = dppf and PR3 = P(p-C6H4F)3; PP = dfurpf and PR3 = P(p-C6H4CF3)3). Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level and the H atoms, [BArF24]- and any solvent molecules are omitted for clarity.
Figure 6. Structures of [Pd(PP)(PR3)Cl][BArF24] (PP = dppf and PR3 = P(p-C6H4F)3; PP = dfurpf and PR3 = P(p-C6H4CF3)3). Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level and the H atoms, [BArF24]- and any solvent molecules are omitted for clarity.
Molecules 29 02047 g006
Molecules 29 02047 g007
Figure 7. CV scan of 1.0 mM [Pd(dfurpf)(PPh2Fc)Cl][BArF24] with 0.1 M [NBu4][PF6] as the supporting electrolyte, measured at 100 mV s−1.
Figure 7. CV scan of 1.0 mM [Pd(dfurpf)(PPh2Fc)Cl][BArF24] with 0.1 M [NBu4][PF6] as the supporting electrolyte, measured at 100 mV s−1.
Molecules 29 02047 g007
Molecules 29 02047 g008
Figure 8. CV scan of 1.0 mM [Pd(dppf)(PiPr3)Cl][BArF24] with 0.1 M [NBu4][PF6] as the supporting electrolyte, measured at 100 mV s−1.
Figure 8. CV scan of 1.0 mM [Pd(dppf)(PiPr3)Cl][BArF24] with 0.1 M [NBu4][PF6] as the supporting electrolyte, measured at 100 mV s−1.
Molecules 29 02047 g008
Table 1. Structural parameters for [Pd2(dppdtbpf)2(μ-Cl)2][BArF24]2.
Table 1. Structural parameters for [Pd2(dppdtbpf)2(μ-Cl)2][BArF24]2.
[Pd(dppdtbpf)Cl2] [42][Pd2(dppdtbpf)2(μ-Cl)2][BArF24]2
PtBu–Pd, Å2.3183(9)2.2977(7)
PPh–Pd, Å2.2917(9)2.2917(6)
Pd–Cl (trans- to Ph), Å2.3395(10)2.3620(8)
Pd–Cl (cis- to Ph), Å2.3416(9)2.3794(9)
P–Pd–P, °101.37(3)99.35(3)
Cl–Pd–Cl, °85.64(3)81.04(3)
τ4 a0.140.14
τ′4 b0.120.12
Cent–Fe–Cent, °179.08(10)177.60(6)
C–Cent–Cent–C, ° c23.8(2)19.25(17)
θ, ° d3.05(14)4.42(10)
%Vbur58.360.0
a Four-coordinate geometry index, where τ4 = 0.00 is square planar and τ4 = 1.00 is tetrahedral [44]. b Modified four-coordinate geometry index, where τ′4 = 0.00 is square planar and τ′4 = 1.00 is tetrahedral [45]. c The torsion angle formed between CA-CentA-CentB-CB, with C being the carbon atom bonded to the phosphorus and Cent being the centroid of the C5 ring. d The dihedral angle between the two C5 rings.
Table 2. 31P{1H} NMR data for [Pd(PP)(PR3)Cl][BArF24] compounds.
Table 2. 31P{1H} NMR data for [Pd(PP)(PR3)Cl][BArF24] compounds.
PPPR331P NMR Signal in ppm (Coupling Constant in Hz)
dppf aPMe336.1 (19.8 and 4.7)32.8 (471.1 and 4.7)−5.3 (471.1 and 19.8)
dippfPMe367.7 (31.2 and 12.0)57.9 (446.1 and 12.0)−11.0 (446.1 and 31.2)
dppdtbpfPMe374.0 (430.7 and 5.5)43.5 (23.5 and 5.5)−8.0 (430.7 and 23.5)
dcpfPMe360.6 (30.4 and 13.6)50.2 (443.0 and 13.6)−11.0 (443.0 and 30.4)
dfurpfPMe331.4 (493.0 and 15.7)−5.9 (15.7 and 12.9)−9.4 (493.0 and 12.9)
dppf aPPh335.5 (17.6 and 4.9)31.0 (480.6 and 17.6)27.1 (480.6 and 4.9)
dippfPPh365.5 (24.0 and 14.1)62.5 (428.1 and 14.1)23.7 (428.1 and 24.0)
dppdtbpfPPh378.8 (423.0 and 6.2)44.1 (19.6 and 6.2)24.2 (423.0 and 19.6)
dfurpfPPh331.8 (491.0 and 17.1)−5.8 (17.1 and 11.7)−9.0 (491.0 and 11.7)
dppf aPPh2Fc36.4 (20.0 and 5.4)30.3 (480.8 and 20.0)24.4 (480.4 and 5.4)
dippfPPh2Fc64.1 (23.5 and 9.7)58.8 (434.6 and 9.7)20.0 (434.6 and 23.5)
dppdtbpfPPh2Fc74.4 (429.6 and 18.1)43.0 (18.1 and 6.1)22.8 (429.6 and 18.1)
dfurpfPPh2Fc30.1 (500.8 and 17.3)−5.9 (17.6 and 15.6)−10.6 (500.8 and 17.3)
dppfP(NMe2)394.3 (607.0 and 10.0)32.2 (17.5 and 9.9)19.0 (607.0 and 17.5)
dppfPiPr350.6 (450.0 and 17.6)32.7 (17.6 and 5.9)21.6 (450.0 and 5.9)
dppfP(CH2Ph)334.0 (16.0 and 6.5)30.1 (452.4 and 6.5)18.9 (452.4 and 16.0)
dppfP(m-tol)335.2 (17.5 and 5.8)30.2 (478.7 and 17.5)26.5 (478.7 and 5.8)
dppfP(p-tol)335.2 (17.6 and 5.9)30.3 (479.3 and 17.6)26.5 (479.3 and 5.9)
dppfP(p-C6H4OMe)350.5 (451.9 and 17.7)32.6 (17.7 and 6.3)21.6 (451.9 and 6.3)
dppfP(p-C6H4F)336.5 (18.2 and 6.4)30.4 (486.7 and 6.4)26.1 (486.7 and 18.2)
dfurpfP(p-C6H4CF3)328.0 (495.2 and 19.6)−5.2 (19.6 and 6.0)−6.4 (495.2 and 6.0)
a Reference [37].
Table 3. Structural parameters for [Pd(PP)(PR3)Cl)][BArF24] compounds where R = alkyl.
Table 3. Structural parameters for [Pd(PP)(PR3)Cl)][BArF24] compounds where R = alkyl.
[Pd(PP)(PR3)Cl][BArF24]
PPdippfdcpfdppf [37]dppf
PR3PMe3PMe3PMe3PiPr3
Pd–P (trans-PR3), Å2.3728(7)2.3815(12)2.3666(15)2.4211(7)
Pd–P (cis-PR3), Å2.2902(7)2.3039(13)2.2833(14)2.2981(6)
Pd–PR3, Å2.3908(9)2.3915(14)2.3722(15)2.3767(6)
Pd–Cl, Å2.3367(7)2.3467(13)2.3324(14)2.3378(6)
PPP–Pd–PPP, °100.25(3)100.30(5)98.81(5)93.01(2)
Cl–Pd–PR3, °78.74(3)80.28(5)82.83(5)85.031
τ4 a0.230.190.120.19
τ′4 b0.200.150.110.17
Cent–Fe–Cent, °178.40(7)178.27(13)179.03(5)179.23(5)
C–Cent–Cent–C, ° c21.96(19)24.4(3)40.2(4)36.49(12)
θ, ° d3.46(11)4.4(2)4.4(2)4.90(9)
%Vbur (PP)56.655.055.152.1
%Vbur (PR3)21.621.522.129.1
a Four-coordinate geometry index, where τ4 = 0.00 is square planar and τ4 = 1.00 is tetrahedral [44]. b Modified four-coordinate geometry index, where τ′4 = 0.00 is square planar and τ′4 = 1.00 is tetrahedral [45]. c The torsion angle formed between CA–CentA–CentB–CB, with C being the carbon atom bonded to the phosphorus and Cent being the centroid of the C5 ring. d The dihedral angle between the two C5 rings.
Table 4. Structural parameters for [Pd(PP)(PR3)Cl)][BArF24] compounds where R = aryl.
Table 4. Structural parameters for [Pd(PP)(PR3)Cl)][BArF24] compounds where R = aryl.
[Pd(PP)(PR3)Cl][BArF24]
PPdppfdppf [37]dfurpf
PR3P(p-C6H4F)3PPh3P(p-C6H4CF3)3
Pd–P (trans-PR3), Å2.3449(13)2.3517(7)2.3686(17)
Pd–P (cis-PR3), Å2.2781(14)2.2803(6)2.2651(15)
Pd–PR3, Å2.3786(13)2.3822(7)2.3516(17)
Pd–Cl, Å2.3435(15)2.3435(6)2.3301(14)
PPP–Pd–PPP, °98.99(5)99.74(2)95.28(6)
Cl–Pd–PR3, °83.36(5)82.90(2)88.65(5)
τ4 a0.210.190.22
τ′4 b0.180.160.20
Cent–Fe–Cent, °178.46(15)178.70(3)179.27(14)
C–Cent–Cent–C, ° c37.4(5)38.32(15)26.6(4)
θ, ° d6.00(3)5.59(11)3.8(3)
%Vbur (PP)56.155.451.3
%Vbur (PR3)27.927.928.7
a Four-coordinate geometry index, where τ4 = 0.00 is square planar and τ4 = 1.00 is tetrahedral [44]. b Modified four-coordinate geometry index, where τ′4 = 0.00 is square planar and τ′4 = 1.00 is tetrahedral [45]. c The torsion angle formed between CA–CentA–CentB–CB with C being the carbon atom bonded to the phosphorus and Cent being the centroid of the C5 ring. d The dihedral angle between the two C5 rings.
Table 5. Cyclic voltammetry (E in V vs. FcH0/+) data for [Pd(PP)(PR3)Cl][BArF24] with similar PR3 ligands in CH2Cl2.
Table 5. Cyclic voltammetry (E in V vs. FcH0/+) data for [Pd(PP)(PR3)Cl][BArF24] with similar PR3 ligands in CH2Cl2.
dppfdippfdppdtbpfDcpfdfurpf
[Pd(PP)Cl2]0.57 [39]0.43 [40]0.51 [39]0.47 [41]0.55 [38]
[Pd(PP)(PMe3)Cl][BArF24]0.66 [37]0.580.590.560.64
[Pd(PP)(PPh3)Cl][BArF24]0.69 [37]0.590.58 0.62
[Pd(PP)(PPh2Fc)Cl[BArF24]0.23 [37]0.220.24 0.24
0.68 [37]0.640.630.65
Table 6. Cyclic voltammetry data for [Pd(PP)(PR3)Cl][BArF24] with various PR3 ligands in CH2Cl2.
Table 6. Cyclic voltammetry data for [Pd(PP)(PR3)Cl][BArF24] with various PR3 ligands in CH2Cl2.
[Pd(dppf)(PR3)Cl][BArF24][Pd(dfurpf)(PR3)Cl][BArF24]
PMe30.66 [37]0.64
P(NMe2)30.63
PiPr30.65
P(CH2Ph)30.68
PPh30.69 [37]0.62
P(m-tol)30.65
P(p-tol)30.64
P(p-C6H4OMe)30.62
P(p-C6H4F)30.65
P(p-C6H4CF3)3 0.59
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Leiby, I.S.; Parparcén, V.; Ding, N.; Kunz, K.J.; Wolfarth, S.A.; Stevens, J.E.; Nataro, C. Cleavage of [Pd2(PP)2(μ-Cl)2][BArF24]2 (PP = Bis(phosphino)ferrocene, BArF24 = Tetrakis(3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)borate) with Monodentate Phosphines. Molecules 2024, 29, 2047. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29092047

AMA Style

Leiby IS, Parparcén V, Ding N, Kunz KJ, Wolfarth SA, Stevens JE, Nataro C. Cleavage of [Pd2(PP)2(μ-Cl)2][BArF24]2 (PP = Bis(phosphino)ferrocene, BArF24 = Tetrakis(3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)borate) with Monodentate Phosphines. Molecules. 2024; 29(9):2047. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29092047

Chicago/Turabian Style

Leiby, Ian S., Virginia Parparcén, Natalya Ding, Klara J. Kunz, Sadie A. Wolfarth, Jeremiah E. Stevens, and Chip Nataro. 2024. "Cleavage of [Pd2(PP)2(μ-Cl)2][BArF24]2 (PP = Bis(phosphino)ferrocene, BArF24 = Tetrakis(3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)borate) with Monodentate Phosphines" Molecules 29, no. 9: 2047. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29092047

APA Style

Leiby, I. S., Parparcén, V., Ding, N., Kunz, K. J., Wolfarth, S. A., Stevens, J. E., & Nataro, C. (2024). Cleavage of [Pd2(PP)2(μ-Cl)2][BArF24]2 (PP = Bis(phosphino)ferrocene, BArF24 = Tetrakis(3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)borate) with Monodentate Phosphines. Molecules, 29(9), 2047. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29092047

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop