Topic Editors

Department of Forestry Sciences and Landscape Architecture, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Qt. de Prados, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal
1. Sciences Faculty, Porto University (FCUP) Rua do Campo Alegre, s.n., 4169-007 Porto, Portugal
2. Institute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology (INESC TEC), Portugal, R. Dr. Roberto Frias, Porto, Portugal

Sustainability in Agri-Food and Forestry Ecosystems—2nd Edition

Abstract submission deadline
30 September 2026
Manuscript submission deadline
30 November 2026
Viewed by
3626

Topic Information

Dear Colleagues,

Food and timber production are principal ecosystem services that are often taken for granted by consumers. However, modern consumption patterns and the need to produce more and at a lower cost have led to situations of resource overexploitation and serious ecological imbalances. The rural–forest interface establishes the contact zone between food production areas, forest goods production areas, and wilderness areas. The adoption of sustainable models of agro-forestry production will make it possible to maintain the delicate balance between the various ecosystem services (production, conservation, regulation, and contemplation).

With the presentation of this topic, we aim to disseminate new agro-forestry management and exploitation models that allow the reduction of the impact of human activities on natural resources (soil and water) and sustainable production.

Potential topics include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Food and timber production;
  • Smart farming and precision agriculture;
  • Smart forestry and precision silviculture;
  • Sustainable primary production;
  • Ecosystem services.

Prof. Dr. José Aranha
Dr. Mario Cunha
Topic Editors

Keywords

  • food and timber production
  • smart farming and precision agriculture
  • smart forestry and precision silviculture
  • sustainable primary production
  • ecosystem services

Participating Journals

Journal Name Impact Factor CiteScore Launched Year First Decision (median) APC
Agronomy
agronomy
3.4 6.7 2011 17 Days CHF 2600 Submit
Biosphere
biosphere
- - 2025 15.0 days * CHF 1000 Submit
Forests
forests
2.5 4.6 2010 16.8 Days CHF 2600 Submit
Resources
resources
3.2 7.2 2012 23.3 Days CHF 1800 Submit
Sustainability
sustainability
3.3 7.7 2009 17.9 Days CHF 2400 Submit

* Median value for all MDPI journals in the second half of 2025.


Preprints.org is a multidisciplinary platform offering a preprint service designed to facilitate the early sharing of your research. It supports and empowers your research journey from the very beginning.

MDPI Topics is collaborating with Preprints.org and has established a direct connection between MDPI journals and the platform. Authors are encouraged to take advantage of this opportunity by posting their preprints at Preprints.org prior to publication:

  1. Share your research immediately: disseminate your ideas prior to publication and establish priority for your work.
  2. Safeguard your intellectual contribution: Protect your ideas with a time-stamped preprint that serves as proof of your research timeline.
  3. Boost visibility and impact: Increase the reach and influence of your research by making it accessible to a global audience.
  4. Gain early feedback: Receive valuable input and insights from peers before submitting to a journal.
  5. Ensure broad indexing: Web of Science (Preprint Citation Index), Google Scholar, Crossref, SHARE, PrePubMed, Scilit and Europe PMC.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Journals
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
25 pages, 881 KB  
Article
Comparative Analysis of Crop Methods and Harvest Season on Agronomic Yield and Spear Quality of Asparagus in Thailand
by Ornprapa Thepsilvisut, Nuengruethai Srikan, Preuk Chutimanukul and Jutamas Romkaew
Resources 2026, 15(4), 56; https://doi.org/10.3390/resources15040056 - 16 Apr 2026
Viewed by 453
Abstract
Asparagus (Asparagus officinalis L.) represents a high-value horticultural crop in Thailand with significant export potential; however, optimizing productivity in tropical environments requires a precise understanding of how cultivation practices and harvest seasons influence marketability. Here, a split-plot experiment arranged in a completely [...] Read more.
Asparagus (Asparagus officinalis L.) represents a high-value horticultural crop in Thailand with significant export potential; however, optimizing productivity in tropical environments requires a precise understanding of how cultivation practices and harvest seasons influence marketability. Here, a split-plot experiment arranged in a completely randomized design with three replications was conducted to examine how different crop methods and harvest seasons affect asparagus yield and quality in Lopburi Province, Thailand. The main plots were categorized by harvest season—summer, rainy, and winter—while the subplots included three crop methods: conventional, GAP, and organic. Summer produced the highest yield and asparagus with the greatest levels of total chlorophyll, phenolics, and DPPH radical scavenging activity compared to other seasons. Although the conventional methods yielded the most spears per plant, these spears contained higher levels of contaminants, including cadmium, lead, and nitrate. In contrast, spears from GAP and organic methods had higher phosphorus levels. However, no pesticide residues were found in any spear samples. Economically, the organic method had the shortest payback period, owing to lower production costs; despite a lower annual yield, stable market prices kept it profitable. In addition, organic soils had the highest levels of organic matter, nitrogen, and phosphorus. Overall, while conventional methods enhance the yield and certain qualities, organic farming, particularly when harvested in summer, yields the highest economic returns and the most sustainable system among those tested. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

30 pages, 14066 KB  
Article
Agricultural Expansion and Forest Transition in Mozambique: Evidence of Premature Decoupling (2001–2024)
by Sebastião De Hermínia Lucas Vilanculos, Sosdito Estevão Mananze and Mário Campos Cunha
Resources 2026, 15(2), 26; https://doi.org/10.3390/resources15020026 - 3 Feb 2026
Viewed by 2545
Abstract
This study analyzes forest cover change patterns, agricultural expansion, and economic growth in Mozambique from 2001 to 2024, using remote sensing data from Global Forest Watch and socioeconomic indicators from the World Bank and FAO. Mozambique lost approximately 4.6 million hectares of forest [...] Read more.
This study analyzes forest cover change patterns, agricultural expansion, and economic growth in Mozambique from 2001 to 2024, using remote sensing data from Global Forest Watch and socioeconomic indicators from the World Bank and FAO. Mozambique lost approximately 4.6 million hectares of forest during the analyzed period, with agriculture accounting for 97.4% of total deforestation. GDP per capita increased by 90.5%, while cultivated area expanded by 116.4%. However, agricultural productivity declined by 25.3%, revealing a paradox: production growth relied on extensive land expansion rather than intensification. Statistical analysis of three 8-year sub-periods identified significant differences in GDP per capita, agricultural GDP per capita, population, and agricultural employment (p < 0.001), but agricultural deforestation remained statistically stable (p = 0.065). This pattern suggests premature decoupling between economic growth and deforestation at income levels (USD 604) substantially below historical Environmental Kuznets Curve thresholds (USD 8000–10,000). However, this decoupling is fragile, driven by capital-intensive extractive sectors that generate GDP growth without absorbing rural populations. The persistence of extensive agricultural expansion, combined with weak governance, demographic pressures, and climate variability, indicates that observed stabilization represents an initial, vulnerable phase requiring structural transformation through agricultural intensification, inclusive industrialization, land tenure reform, and climate resilience building. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop