Search Results (114)

With the swift progression of the High-Standard Farmland Construction Program in China and worldwide, many dryland wheat fields can be irrigated once during the wheat growth stage (one-off irrigation). However, the combined strategies of one-off irrigation, tillage, and N management for augmenting wheat grain yield and quality are still undeveloped in drought regions. Two-site split–split field experiments were conducted to study the impacts of irrigation, tillage, and N management and their combined effects on grain yield; the contents of protein and protein components; processing quality; and the characteristics of N accumulation and translocation in wheat from a typical dryland wheat production area in China from 2020 to 2022. The irrigation practices (I0, zero irrigation and I1, one-off irrigation), tillage methods (RT, rotary tillage; PT, plowing; and SS, subsoiling) and N management (N0, N120, N180, and N240) were applied to the main plots, subplots and sub-subplots, respectively. The experimental sites, experimental years, irrigation practices, tillage methods, and N management methods and their interaction significantly affected the yield, quality, and plant N characteristics of wheat in most cases. Compared to zero irrigation, one-off irrigation significantly increased the plant N accumulation, enhancing grain yield by 33.7% while decreasing the contents of total protein, albumin, globulin, gliadin, and glutenin by 4.4%, 6.4%, 8.0%, 12.2%, and 10.0%, respectively. It also decreased the wet gluten content, stability time, sedimentation value, extensibility by 4.1%, 10.7%, 9.7%, and 5.5%, respectively, averaged across sites and years. Subsoiling simultaneously enhanced the aforementioned indicators compared to rotary tillage and plowing in most sites and years. With the increase in N rates, wheat yield firstly increased and then decreased under zero irrigation combined with rotary tillage, while it gradually increased when one-off irrigation was combined with subsoiling; however, the contents of total protein and protein components and the quality tended to increase firstly and then stabilize regardless of irrigation practices and tillage methods. The correlations of yield and quality indicators with plant N characteristics were negative when using distinct irrigation practices and tillage methods, while they were positive under varying N management. The decrease in wheat quality induced by one-off irrigation could be alleviated by optimizing N management. I1STN180 exhibited higher yield, plant N accumulation and translocation, and better quality in most cases; thus, all metrics of wheat quality were significantly increased, with a yield enhancement of 50.3% compared to I0RTN180. Therefore, one-off irrigation with subsoiling and an N rate of 180 kg ha⁻¹ is an optimal strategy for high yield, high protein, and high quality in dryland wheat production systems where one-off irrigation is assured. Full article

Living mulch intercropping systems are considered as nature-based solutions with a low environmental footprint for managing weeds, improving biodiversity and agroecosystem sustainability. In drylands, however, they may increase intra/inter-specific competition for water, reducing crop productivity. We tested conservation tillage (TLG) carob plots with and without irrigation (TLG_irr; TLG_dry) vs. rainfed intercropping systems of carob and (i) thyme (Thymbra capitata; T-System) or (ii) clover (Trifolium squarrosum; C-System), strategically planted on the south (sun)-exposed soil side (SES) of carobs, to reduce soil temperature/evaporation. Carob water relations, productivity and environmental footprints were examined for three years under semi-arid, low weed-competition (Skarinou-SKR) and arid high weed-competition (Vrysoules-VRY) conditions in Cyprus. Carob yield efficiency (kg/m³) in SKR, was >27% higher for the T-System (p < 0.05; SES cover ca. 85%; year-3), matching a higher leaf water content (p < 0.001) compared to TLG_dry. The T-System reached 28% and 56% of TLG_irr yields during very dry and normal rainfall years; TLG_dry yields approached zero. For VRY, no negative impacts on carob leaf water, at 25% SES cover, were found. SKR’s C-System improved leaf water content (p < 0.05) for only one year. The T-System also outperformed TLG_irr and TLG_dry in terms of reducing irrigation needs and energy consumption, breaking new grounds for dryland agroforestry. Full article

Maize (Zea mays) is one of the most cultivated crops in South Africa, serving as a staple food, stock feed, and a key element in several industrial applications. It contributes significantly to the growth of the South African agricultural economy. The cultivation of maize generates a large amount of agricultural waste, mainly in the form of maize stover (MS), which encapsulates leaves, stalks, cobs, and husks. Approximately 5.15 metric tons (Mt) yr⁻¹ of MS are generated in South Africa. This corresponds to an energy potential of 94 PJ. There is immense potential to surpass the annual yield of MS by 126% up to about 11.66 Mt yr⁻¹ through practices such as zero tillage and improved agricultural production systems. MS may pose a serious threat to the environment if not managed in a sustainable and eco-friendly manner. Valorization of MS into biogas presents an excellent opportunity to effectively control biomass waste while contributing to renewable energy production and mitigating dependence on depleting fossil fuels. However, MS continues to be overlooked as a sustainable bioenergy resource due to its lignocellulosic structure. This study explores the potential of converting MS into biogas for heat and power generation, addressing both energy needs and waste management in South Africa. The purpose is to provide knowledge that will inform researchers, innovators, industrialists, policy makers, investors, and other key stakeholders interested in renewable energy systems. Collaborative efforts among multiple stakeholders are vital to leverage biogas as a technology to promote socio-economic development in South Africa. Full article

This study underscores the critical role of tillage methods in optimizing soybean yield and quality. Plowed tillage + strip-drill sowing (PSD) offers a balance between crop productivity and quality by maintaining soil structure while enhancing nutrient availability. Reduced tillage methods such as zero tillage + strip-drill (ZSD) and no-plowed tillage + strip-drill (NSD) can improve leaf greenness by about 10–15% and pod numbers by 6.7% and 3.5%, respectively. However, such methods may reduce seed quality and germination capacity, impacting the overall yield. In contrast, plowed tillage + conventional row sowing (PCR) promotes balanced nutrient composition and carbohydrate production under optimal soil conditions. Tillage practices significantly influence nutrient components such as ash content, which ranges from 55.8 g kg⁻¹,(PCR) to 57.4 g kg⁻¹ (ZSD). ZSD was found to enhance protein levels by 3% at the expense of carbohydrates, likely due to improved nutrient retention. The present analysis highlights ZSD as an effective method for stabilizing protein yield (mean value 843.8 kg ha⁻¹) and fat yield (mean value 449.3 kg ha⁻¹) across variable environments, supporting the use of ZSD in conservation agriculture. Future studies should explore how tillage practices affect soil health, economic sustainability, and yield stability over time, especially under changing climatic conditions. Optimizing plant density, enhancing seed traits, and improving germination can collectively drive significant improvements in soybean productivity across diverse agro-ecological zones. Full article

Agriculture in the Indian Sundarbans deltaic region primarily depends on a rice-based monocropping system during the rainy season, with the subsequent season often remaining fallow. To mitigate this issue, a series of experiments using zero tillage and straw mulching (ZTSM) potato cultivation were conducted over eight consecutive years (2017–2024) across various islands in the Sundarbans Delta, West Bengal, aimed to intensify the cropping system and ensure the betterment of the land use pattern using climate-smart agricultural practices. In the initial two years, the experiments concentrated on assessing different potato cultivars and nutrient dosages under zero tillage and paddy straw mulching conditions. During the subsequent years, the focus shifted to field demonstrations under diverse climatic conditions. The research included the application of different macronutrients and growth regulators, in combination with different depths of straw mulching. In the final years of the study, the intervention was dedicated solely to the horizontal expansion of cultivated land. These initiatives aimed to enhance agricultural productivity and sustainable land use in the polders, promoting climate-resilient farming practices. From the sets of experiments, we standardized the sustainable nutrient management strategies and selection of appropriate potato cultivars vis-à-vis depth of straw mulching and, finally, the overall best agronomic practices for the region. The adoption of the ZTSM potato cultivation system demonstrated considerable success, as evidenced by the remarkable increase in the number of farmers employing this sustainable agricultural practice. The number of farmers practicing zero tillage potato cultivation surged from 23 in the initial year to over 1100, covering an area of more than 15 ha, highlighting the effectiveness of the technology. The analysis of the estimated adoption also showed that more than 90% adoption is likely to be achieved within a decade. This potential expansion underscores the benefits of the ZTSM potato cultivation system in improving soil health, conserving water, and reducing labour and costs. As more farmers recognize the advantages of zero tillage potato mulching, this approach is poised to play a pivotal role in sustainable agriculture, enhancing productivity while promoting environmental stewardship. Full article

The winter wheat and summer maize double cropping system is the primary cropping pattern for wheat and maize in dryland areas of China. The management of tillage in this system is typically conducted before wheat sowing. However, few studies have validated and quantified the impact of tillage methods before wheat sowing and irrigation practices during the wheat season on the yield formation and water use efficiency of summer maize. Therefore, this study hypothesized that subsoiling before wheat sowing improves maize yield and WUE by enhancing soil moisture retention and plant development. A three-year field experiment with a two-factor split-plot design was conducted at the junction of the Loess Plateau and the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain in China for validation, from 2019 to 2022. Three tillage methods before wheat sowing (RT: rotary tillage; PT: plowing, SS: subsoiling) were assigned to the main plots, and two irrigation practices during wheat growing season (W0: zero-irrigation; W1: one-off irrigation) were assigned to subplots. We measured the soil moisture, grain yield, dry matter accumulation, nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) accumulation, and water use efficiency of summer maize. The results indicated that subsoiling before wheat sowing increased soil water storage at the sowing of summer maize, thereby promoting dry matter and nutrient accumulation. Compared to rotary tillage and plowing, subsoiling before wheat sowing increased grain yield and water use efficiency of maize by an average of 19.5% and 21.8%, respectively. One-off irrigation during the wheat season had negative effects on pre-sowing soil water storage and maize productivity in terms of yield and dry matter accumulation. However, subsoiling before wheat sowing can mitigate these negative effects of one-off irrigation. Correlation analysis and path model results indicated that tillage methods before wheat sowing had a greater impact on soil water storage and maize productivity than irrigation practices during wheat growing season. The most direct factor affecting maize yield was dry matter accumulation, whereas the most direct factor affecting water use efficiency was nutrient accumulation. The technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) comprehensive evaluation indicated that subsoiling before wheat sowing was superior for achieving high maize yield and water use efficiency under the practice of one-off irrigation during the wheat season. These findings offer practical guidance for optimizing soil water use and maize productivity in drylands. Full article

Rice-based cropping systems are the predominant sources of livelihood for farmers in South Asia, where soil quality decline is a major concern. An experiment was conducted at Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India, in 2018–2019 and 2019–2020. It comprised two rice cultivars, ‘Manaswini’ (M) and ‘Hasanta’ (H), and three nitrogen management practices—100% soil test-based nitrogen (STN) (N₁₀₀), 75% STN + in situ green manuring (Sesbania) (N₇₅+GM), and 50% STN + green manuring (N₅₀+GM)—in the main plot. Meanwhile, sub-plots consisted of three tillage methods for succeeding toria–sweet corn, namely zero tillage (ZT), conventional tillage (CT), and a furrow-irrigated raised bed (FIRB). The experiment was laid out in a split plot design with four replications to assess system nutrient uptake, productivity, and soil quality. Both rice cultivars were equal in terms of system nutrient uptake. The N₇₅+GM practice recorded the highest system NPK uptake (304.1, 70.34, and 343.5 kg ha⁻¹, respectively), enhancing the system N uptake by 10.7 and 7.4%, P uptake by 18.8 and 12.2%, and K uptake by 9.8 and 9.6% over N₁₀₀ and N₅₀+GM, respectively. ZT recorded the highest system NPK uptake (299.9, 70.6, and 339.7 kg ha⁻¹, respectively). The most promising treatments, M+(N₇₅+GM)-ZT and H+(N₇₅+GM)-ZT, recorded the maximum system economic yield (10.72 and 10.64 t ha⁻¹), residue yield (22.36 and 21.98 t ha⁻¹), biological yield (33.07 and 32.63 t ha⁻¹), and relative soil quality index (0.84 and 0.91). Correlation and principal component analyses exhibited positive and close relationships between all biological yield and soil quality parameters, except for micro water-stable aggregates, the fungal population, and the bulk density. The application of N₇₅+GM in M or H rice and ZT in succeeding toria–sweet corn can sustain productivity and soil quality in Eastern India. Full article

The tillage method and straw returning are the two most important agronomic measures for crop production, but their combined effects on nutrient accumulation and utilization and grain yield in dryland winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L., namely wheat)–summer maize (Zea mays L., namely maize) double-cropping system are still poorly understood. The present study delves into the impact of the tillage method and straw returning on yield and nutrient accumulation and utilization in wheat–maize double-cropping system based on a field split-plot positioning experiment (started in October 2009). Three tillage methods—plowing (PT, 30–35 cm in depth), rotary tillage (RT, 12–15 cm in depth), no-tillage (NT)—and two straw management—zero straw returning (S0) and straw returning (SR)—were assigned to the main plots and subplots, respectively, thus encompassing six distinct treatments of PTS0, PTSR, RTS0, RTSR, NTS0, and NTSR. The grain yield and its components; the nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) accumulation at maturity; and the internal efficiency of N, P, and K in wheat and maize from 2018 to 2022 were investigated. The results indicated that in the experimental years, tillage methods and straw management significantly affected wheat, maize, and annual yield. Compared with NT, RT significantly increased wheat yield by 9.5% and maize K accumulation by 5.8%, and PT significantly increased wheat K accumulation by 11.1% and the yield and N, P, and K accumulation of maize by 6.3%, 7.8%, 8.9%, and 5.3%. Compared with RT, PT significantly increased yield and K accumulation in wheat and yield and N and P accumulation in maize. Compared with NTSR, PTSR significantly increased the yield and N, P, and K accumulation in wheat, but it did not affect yield and nutrient accumulation in maize; RTSR significantly increased wheat yield while it significantly decreased yield and N, P, and K accumulation in maize. Compared with RTSR, PTSR significantly increased the yield and N, P, and K accumulation by 4.0%, 19.5%, 19.6%, and 7.0% in wheat, respectively, and 7.5%, 6.1%, 13.3% and 13.6% in maize. Under the same tillage method, compared with S0, SR significantly increased crop yield and N, P, and K accumulation by 2.4–25.4%, 8.5–43.3%, 12.9–37.8%, and 11.0–51.0%, but it significantly reduced wheat K internal efficiency and maize N, P, K internal efficiency. The effectiveness of straw management on crop yield and N, P, and K accumulation was greater than that of tillage methods. Therefore, the combination of plowing tillage with straw returning (PTSR) is an effective tactic to promote crop yield in dryland wheat–maize double-cropping system. This study offered insights for achieving high yield by regulating the accumulation and internal efficiency of plant N, P, and K nutrients in wheat–maize double-cropping system in drought-prone areas and environments similar to the study areas. Full article

Zero-tillage (ZT) is a conservation soil management approach which relies more heavily on herbicide application for weed control than in ploughed soil. Changes in soil management can influence the structure and organisation of pore space in soil, which drives changes in the transport of particulates and dissolved substances. Formulation of pesticides can be used to change the delivery of active ingredients to soil; however, it is currently unknown how changing the formulation of an herbicide can influence the transport properties between ZT vs. ploughing. We investigated the bioefficacy of two formulations of the herbicide atrazine, a pre- and post-emergence herbicide that inhibits photosystem II. Bioefficacy was assessed using physical measures and survival analysis of an early photosynthesis-dependent weed species, Amaranthus retroflexus L., over time, and soil pore network structure was assessed by analysing three-dimensional images produced by X-ray Computed Tomography. Increasing the herbicide application rate generally improved bioefficacy, though it was reduced in soils managed under ZT. Under herbicide-treated ZT samples, survival time was higher, ranging from 13.4 to 18.2 days compared with 12.6 to 15.4 days in ploughed samples, the mean dry plant mass was higher, ranging from 0.5 to 2.5 mg compared with 0.05 to 0.68 mg in ploughed samples, and the mean total plant length was higher, ranging from 1.73 to 12.1 mm compared with 0.2 to 5.45 mm in ploughed samples. Changes in the soil pore network previously demonstrated to be indicators of preferential transport were correlated with measures of bioefficacy, including pore thickness and connectivity density. Reduced atrazine efficacy under ZT is problematic considering the inherent reliance on chemical methods for weed control, we suggest that pursuing formulation strategies to alleviate potential risks of loss via preferential transport may be fruitful. Full article

Intensive agriculture is the chief cause of soil degradation, particularly in regions with low soil organic carbon status, such as semi-arid southern India. In the quest to attain sustainable yield and improved soil quality, conservation agriculture (CA) is being advocated and adopted globally, including in India. In this experiment, CA was implemented to investigate the synergistic impacts of tillage and weed management on soil quality index and system yield and to identify a remunerative treatment combination that can sustain system yield and enhance soil quality. Contrasting tillage practices (main plots) included the T₁: conventional tillage with cotton–conventional tillage with maize–fallow, i.e., no Sesbania rostrata (Farmers’ practice), T₂: conventional tillage with cotton–zero tillage with maize–zero tillage with Sesbania rostrata and T₃: zero tillage with cotton + Sesbania rostrata residues–zero tillage with maize + cotton residues–zero tillage with Sesbania rostrata + maize stubbles. Weed management tactics (sub-plots) were W₁: chemical weed control, W₂: herbicide rotation, W₃: integrated weed management and W₄: single hand-weeded control in a split-plot design with cotton–maize–Sesbania cropping system over 3 years, in a split-plot design. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed using the soil quality index (SQI)-CAL Version 1.0 software tool to extract minimum datasets from measured soil properties. A total of 40 soil variables were analyzed at 60 DAS and after the maize harvest, then subjected to principal component analysis (PCA) and subjected to PCA in soil quality index (SQI)-CAL software as to choose variables, minimum dataset and obtain soil quality index. The following soil properties, soil organic carbon (SOC), silt fraction, available soil zinc (Zn), iron (Fe), potassium (K), nitrogen (N), pH, electrical conductivity (EC), soil carbon to nitrogen (C:N) and cation exchange capacity (CEC), were selected as indicators based on correlations, calculated PCA and adept opinions on texture and lime concretions of experimental soil. The soil quality index improved by 23.34% in the T₃W₄ compared to T₁W₁. The system yield was 51.79% higher with the adoption of T₃W₃ compared to T₃W₄ combinations. Therefore, considering both system yield and soil quality index, T₃ and W₃ were remunerative and the best treatment combination among all others to sustain both soil and crop productivity in this region. Full article

The growing demand for quality food has intensified agricultural practices, thus deteriorating soil fertility. In response, reclamation techniques such as minimum, zero, or no tillage have been applied, especially in the Bajio region of the State of Guanajuato, Mexico. However, a reliable tool to evaluate the effectiveness of these techniques remains elusive. This study evaluated the effect of zero tillage and conventional tillage by developing a Soil Quality Index (SQI) from eight agricultural soils in the Bajio region. A set of 26 physicochemical indicators was used, reducing them by means of principal component analysis (PCA). Subsequently, the SQI methodology called “unified weighted” was applied. The resulting SQI_u included key indicators such as C/N, SND, ESP, and Fe. Although significant differences in soil quality were observed among the samples tested, the SQI_u was unable to discern soil quality under the different tillage schemes. This may be attributed to the limited application time of zero tillage, which might not be sufficient to achieve significant recovery of SQI indicators. Nevertheless, the SQI_u could be useful as a monitoring tool to evaluate the progress of soil recovery under zero tillage, both in the studied area and in similar contexts at the national or international level. Full article

Soil health is essential for sustainable agricultural operations, as it supports farm production and ecosystem services. The adoption of sustainable agriculture practices such as conservation tillage, cover cropping, and crop rotation provides significant benefits for both crop productivity and environmental sustainability. These practices can increase soil biodiversity, nutrient cycling, and organic matter, which increase the resilience of agroecosystems. This narrative review synthesizes the insights of the soil health practices adoption literature, with a focus on common farming practices that can improve soil health and enhance crop yields, reviewing the results of various approaches and pointing out the challenges and opportunities for implementing sustainable agriculture on a larger scale. This paper discusses the effects of various tillage and cropping system approaches on soil health, including no-till and conventional tillage systems, crop rotation, cover cropping, cultivator combinations, and fertilizer application. This study found that conservation tillage is more beneficial to soil health than conventional tillage—which is still debated among scientists and farmers—and that different tillage methods interact differently. In contrast, agricultural yields increase more with intercropping, crop rotation, and cover crops than monocropping. For maintaining soil fertility, this study shows that agricultural yields could be increased by implementing zero tillage. This review identifies the most suitable farming practices for improving soil health while boosting crop production with minimal negative impact on the soil. It also highlights the benefits of these practices in maintaining soil quality. Full article

The sustainable productivity of rice–wheat cropping systems relies on soil health, and soil health can be positively influenced by treating previous crop residues using conservation tillage practices. The present study examined the impact of three rice residue-management practices under zero-tilled wheat (ZTW) and conventionally tilled wheat (CTW), along with two rice-sowing practices, during rice cultivation on soil functional microbial diversity, physiological profiling, and grain yields of rice and wheat. Anchored residues (ARs) under ZTW exhibited significantly (p ≤ 0.05) high average well color development—31.43% more than CTW with no residue (NR). CTW with residue burning (BUR) showed a 5.42% increase in the Shannon diversity index compared to CTW-NR. Substrate richness was 10.02% higher in CTW-BUR compared to CTW-NR. CTW-BUR demonstrated the highest 17.98% increase in the Shannon evenness index compared to CTW-NR. The direct-seeded rice (DSR) system generally surpassed puddled transplanted rice (PTR) in most indices, except for the Shannon evenness index values. ZTW-AR exhibited the highest utilization of amino acids, carboxylic acids, and phenolic compounds, while CTW-BUR exhibited the highest utilization of carbohydrates and polymers utilization, and ZTW with no-residue (NR) exhibited the highest utilization of amines. Rice and wheat grain yields were highest with full residue in ZTW and lowest in CTW-NR. PTR supported higher rice yields, while DSR was superior for wheat. These findings highlight the favorable role of residue retention with no tillage during wheat cultivation in the maintenance of soil quality and rice–wheat productivity. Full article

In spite of the detrimental effects of climate change and decreasing resource efficiency, maize farming is essential to the world’s food and nutritional security. With regard to sustainable maize farming in this environment, conservation agriculture (CA) offers a framework that holds promise in terms of low soil disturbance, perennial soil cover, and sustainable crop rotation. In order to acquire more profound information on the research advancements and publication patterns related to maize under CA scenarios, a bibliometric analysis was conducted. This involved utilizing René Descartes’s Discourse Framework to extract and screen 2587 documents spanning the years 2001 to 2023 from the Dimensions.ai database. The mapping showed that different stakeholders were becoming more interested in maize research under various CA pathways, with a greater emphasis on reaching the second sustainable development target, or “zero hunger”. The most influential journals were “Soil and Tillage Research” and “Field Crops Research”, with 131 and 85 papers with 6861 and 6186 citations, respectively. The performance analysis found “Christian L. Thierfelder” and “Mangi Lal Jat” as the eminent researchers in the areas of maize research under CA. Thus, the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) and the Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI) were identified as the important institutions in conducting research pertaining to maize under CA systems, while the United States, India, and Mexico emerged as prominent countries with notable collaboration efforts for imparting research under the given scenarios. Three thematic clusters delineating keywords from three distinct sections—key drivers, objectives, and methodology—were identified through co-word analysis using word clouds, tree maps, and thematic networking of the keywords from the abstract and titles of screened publications. These thematic clusters highlighted the growing emphasis on region-specific studies under CA, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa and the Indo-Gangetic plain, to enhance the resilience of the agri-food system. Therefore, mapping maize’s potentialities within the CA framework has revealed the field’s dynamic nature and offers insightful information to researchers and policymakers that could help them plan future studies and cooperative initiatives aimed at boosting the productivity and sustainability of maize-based systems under the CA framework. Full article

Scientific evaluation of cultivated land quality (CLQ) is necessary for promoting rational utilization of cultivated land and achieving one of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Zero Hunger. However, the CLQ evaluation system proposed in previous studies was diversified, and the methods were inefficient. In this study, based on China’s first national standard “Cultivated Land Quality Grade” (GB/T 33469-2016), we constructed a unified county-level CLQ evaluation system by selecting 15 indicators from five aspects—site condition, environmental condition, physicochemical property, nutrient status and field management—and used the Delphi method to calculate the membership degree of the indicators. Taking Jimo district of Shandong Province, China, as a case study, we compared the performance of three machine learning models, including random forest, AdaBoost, and support vector regression, to evaluate CLQ using multi-temporal remote sensing data. The comprehensive index method was used to reveal the spatial distribution of CLQ. The results showed that the CLQ evaluation based on multi-temporal remote sensing data and machine learning model was efficient and reliable, and the evaluation results had a significant positive correlation with crop yield (r was 0.44, p < 0.001). The proportions of cultivated land of high-, medium- and poor-quality were 27.43%, 59.37% and 13.20%, respectively. The CLQ in the western part of the study area was better, while it was worse in the eastern and central parts. The main limiting factors include irrigation capacity and texture configuration. Accordingly, a series of targeted measures and policies were suggested, such as strengthening the construction of farmland water conservancy facilities, deep tillage of soil and continuing to construct well-facilitated farmland. This study proposed a fast and reliable method for evaluating CLQ, and the results are helpful to promote the protection of cultivated land and ensure food security. Full article