Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (972)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = screening bias

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
26 pages, 1589 KiB  
Systematic Review
Machine Learning and Generative AI in Learning Analytics for Higher Education: A Systematic Review of Models, Trends, and Challenges
by Miguel Ángel Rodríguez-Ortiz, Pedro C. Santana-Mancilla and Luis E. Anido-Rifón
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(15), 8679; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15158679 (registering DOI) - 5 Aug 2025
Abstract
This systematic review examines how machine learning (ML) and generative AI (GenAI) have been integrated into learning analytics (LA) in higher education (2018–2025). Following PRISMA 2020, we screened 9590 records and included 101 English-language, peer-reviewed empirical studies that applied ML or GenAI within [...] Read more.
This systematic review examines how machine learning (ML) and generative AI (GenAI) have been integrated into learning analytics (LA) in higher education (2018–2025). Following PRISMA 2020, we screened 9590 records and included 101 English-language, peer-reviewed empirical studies that applied ML or GenAI within LA contexts. Records came from 12 databases (last search 15 March 2025), and the results were synthesized via thematic clustering. ML approaches dominate LA tasks, such as engagement prediction, dropout-risk modelling, and academic-performance forecasting, whereas GenAI—mainly transformer models like GPT-4 and BERT—is emerging in real-time feedback, adaptive learning, and sentiment analysis. Studies spanned world regions. Most ML papers (n = 75) examined engagement or dropout, while GenAI papers (n = 26) focused on adaptive feedback and sentiment analysis. No formal risk-of-bias assessment was conducted due to heterogeneity. While ML methods are well-established, GenAI applications remain experimental and face challenges related to transparency, pedagogical grounding, and implementation feasibility. This review offers a comparative synthesis of paradigms and outlines future directions for responsible, inclusive, theory-informed AI use in education. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 1351 KiB  
Review
Functional and Neuroplastic Effects of Cross-Education in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review with Bibliometric Analysis
by Jorge M. Vélez-Gutiérrez, Andrés Rojas-Jaramillo, Juan D. Ascuntar-Viteri, Juan D. Quintero, Francisco García-Muro San José, Bruno Bazuelo-Ruiz, Roberto Cannataro and Diego A. Bonilla
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(15), 8641; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15158641 (registering DOI) - 4 Aug 2025
Abstract
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) results in prolonged muscle weakness, impaired neuromuscular control, and delayed return to sport. Cross-education (CE), unilateral training of the uninjured limb, has been proposed as an adjunct therapy to promote bilateral adaptations. This scoping review evaluated the functional [...] Read more.
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) results in prolonged muscle weakness, impaired neuromuscular control, and delayed return to sport. Cross-education (CE), unilateral training of the uninjured limb, has been proposed as an adjunct therapy to promote bilateral adaptations. This scoping review evaluated the functional and neuroplastic effects of CE rehabilitation post-ACLR. Following PRISMA-ScR and JBI guidelines, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and PEDro were searched up to February 2025. A bibliometric analysis was also conducted to report keyword co-occurrence and identify trends in this line of research. Of 333 screened references, 14 studies (price index: 43% and low-to-moderate risk of bias) involving 721 participants (aged 17–45 years) met inclusion criteria. CE protocols (6–12 weeks; 2–5 sessions/week) incorporating isometric, concentric, and eccentric exercises demonstrated strength gains (10–31%) and strength preservation, alongside improved limb symmetry (5–14%) and dynamic balance (7–18%). There is growing interest in neuroplasticity and corticospinal excitability, although neuroplastic changes were assessed heterogeneously across studies. Findings support CE as a feasible and low-cost strategy to complement early-stage ACLR rehabilitation, especially when direct loading of the affected limb is limited. Standardized protocols for clinical intervention and neurophysiological assessment are needed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Approaches of Physical Therapy-Based Rehabilitation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 446 KiB  
Systematic Review
Environmental Enrichment in Dairy Small Ruminants: A PRISMA-Based Review on Welfare Implications and Future Research Directions
by Fabiana Ribeiro Caldara, Jéssica Lucilene Cantarini Buchini and Rodrigo Garófallo Garcia
Dairy 2025, 6(4), 42; https://doi.org/10.3390/dairy6040042 - 1 Aug 2025
Viewed by 124
Abstract
Background: Environmental enrichment is a promising strategy to improve the welfare of dairy goats and sheep. However, studies in this field remain scattered, and its effects on productivity are unclear. Objectives: To evaluate the effects of environmental enrichment on behavioral, physiological, and productive [...] Read more.
Background: Environmental enrichment is a promising strategy to improve the welfare of dairy goats and sheep. However, studies in this field remain scattered, and its effects on productivity are unclear. Objectives: To evaluate the effects of environmental enrichment on behavioral, physiological, and productive parameters in dairy goats and sheep. Data sources: Scopus and Web of Science were searched for studies published from 2010 to 2025. Study eligibility criteria: Experimental or observational peer-reviewed studies comparing enriched vs. non-enriched housing in dairy goats or sheep, reporting on welfare or productivity outcomes. Methods: This review followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines and the PICO framework. Two independent reviewers screened and extracted data. Risk of bias was assessed with the SYRCLE tool. Results: Thirteen studies were included, mostly with goats. Physical, sensory, and social enrichments showed benefits for behavior (e.g., activity, fewer stereotypies) and stress physiology. However, results varied by social rank, enrichment type, and physiological stage. Only three studies assessed productive parameters (weight gain in kids/lambs); none evaluated milk yield or quality. Limitations: Most studies had small samples and short durations. No meta-analysis was conducted due to heterogeneity. Conclusions: Environmental enrichment can benefit the welfare of dairy goats and sheep. However, evidence on productivity is scarce. Long-term studies are needed to evaluate its cost-effectiveness and potential impacts on milk yield and reproductive performance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Dairy Small Ruminants)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 340 KiB  
Review
Methodological Standards for Conducting High-Quality Systematic Reviews
by Alessandro De Cassai, Burhan Dost, Serkan Tulgar and Annalisa Boscolo
Biology 2025, 14(8), 973; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14080973 (registering DOI) - 1 Aug 2025
Viewed by 236
Abstract
Systematic reviews are a cornerstone of evidence-based research, providing comprehensive summaries of existing studies to answer specific research questions. This article offers a detailed guide to conducting high-quality systematic reviews in biology, health and social sciences. It outlines key steps, including developing and [...] Read more.
Systematic reviews are a cornerstone of evidence-based research, providing comprehensive summaries of existing studies to answer specific research questions. This article offers a detailed guide to conducting high-quality systematic reviews in biology, health and social sciences. It outlines key steps, including developing and registering a protocol, designing comprehensive search strategies, and selecting studies through a screening process. The article emphasizes the importance of accurate data extraction and the use of validated tools to assess the risk of bias across different study designs. Both meta-analysis (quantitative approach) and narrative synthesis (qualitative approach) are discussed in detail. The guide also highlights the use of frameworks, such as GRADE, to assess the certainty of evidence and provides recommendations for clear and transparent reporting in line with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. This paper aims to adapt and translate evidence-based review principles, commonly applied in clinical research, into the context of biological sciences. By highlighting domain-specific methodologies, challenges, and resources, we provide tailored guidance for researchers in ecology, molecular biology, evolutionary biology, and related fields in order to conduct transparent and reproducible evidence syntheses. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Theoretical Biology and Biomathematics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 624 KiB  
Systematic Review
Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Perinatal Care Pathways: A Scoping Review of Reviews of Applications, Outcomes, and Equity
by Rabie Adel El Arab, Omayma Abdulaziz Al Moosa, Zahraa Albahrani, Israa Alkhalil, Joel Somerville and Fuad Abuadas
Nurs. Rep. 2025, 15(8), 281; https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15080281 - 31 Jul 2025
Viewed by 143
Abstract
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have been reshaping maternal, fetal, neonatal, and reproductive healthcare by enhancing risk prediction, diagnostic accuracy, and operational efficiency across the perinatal continuum. However, no comprehensive synthesis has yet been published. Objective: To conduct a scoping [...] Read more.
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have been reshaping maternal, fetal, neonatal, and reproductive healthcare by enhancing risk prediction, diagnostic accuracy, and operational efficiency across the perinatal continuum. However, no comprehensive synthesis has yet been published. Objective: To conduct a scoping review of reviews of AI/ML applications spanning reproductive, prenatal, postpartum, neonatal, and early child-development care. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus through April 2025. Two reviewers independently screened records, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality using AMSTAR 2 for systematic reviews, ROBIS for bias assessment, SANRA for narrative reviews, and JBI guidance for scoping reviews. Results: Thirty-nine reviews met our inclusion criteria. In preconception and fertility treatment, convolutional neural network-based platforms can identify viable embryos and key sperm parameters with over 90 percent accuracy, and machine-learning models can personalize follicle-stimulating hormone regimens to boost mature oocyte yield while reducing overall medication use. Digital sexual-health chatbots have enhanced patient education, pre-exposure prophylaxis adherence, and safer sexual behaviors, although data-privacy safeguards and bias mitigation remain priorities. During pregnancy, advanced deep-learning models can segment fetal anatomy on ultrasound images with more than 90 percent overlap compared to expert annotations and can detect anomalies with sensitivity exceeding 93 percent. Predictive biometric tools can estimate gestational age within one week with accuracy and fetal weight within approximately 190 g. In the postpartum period, AI-driven decision-support systems and conversational agents can facilitate early screening for depression and can guide follow-up care. Wearable sensors enable remote monitoring of maternal blood pressure and heart rate to support timely clinical intervention. Within neonatal care, the Heart Rate Observation (HeRO) system has reduced mortality among very low-birth-weight infants by roughly 20 percent, and additional AI models can predict neonatal sepsis, retinopathy of prematurity, and necrotizing enterocolitis with area-under-the-curve values above 0.80. From an operational standpoint, automated ultrasound workflows deliver biometric measurements at about 14 milliseconds per frame, and dynamic scheduling in IVF laboratories lowers staff workload and per-cycle costs. Home-monitoring platforms for pregnant women are associated with 7–11 percent reductions in maternal mortality and preeclampsia incidence. Despite these advances, most evidence derives from retrospective, single-center studies with limited external validation. Low-resource settings, especially in Sub-Saharan Africa, remain under-represented, and few AI solutions are fully embedded in electronic health records. Conclusions: AI holds transformative promise for perinatal care but will require prospective multicenter validation, equity-centered design, robust governance, transparent fairness audits, and seamless electronic health record integration to translate these innovations into routine practice and improve maternal and neonatal outcomes. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 974 KiB  
Systematic Review
Biofeedback in Pediatric, Adolescent, and Young Adult Cancer Care: A Systematic Review
by Marie Barnett, Shari A. Langer, Konstantina Matsoukas, Sanjana Dugad, Anelisa Mdleleni and Inna Khazan
Children 2025, 12(8), 998; https://doi.org/10.3390/children12080998 - 29 Jul 2025
Viewed by 302
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Biofeedback interventions are increasingly utilized in pediatric and adult care, with evidence in treating specific medical conditions and specific symptoms. However, evidence supporting their efficacy among children and adolescents and young adults (AYAs, aged 15–39) with cancer is limited. The aims [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Biofeedback interventions are increasingly utilized in pediatric and adult care, with evidence in treating specific medical conditions and specific symptoms. However, evidence supporting their efficacy among children and adolescents and young adults (AYAs, aged 15–39) with cancer is limited. The aims of this systematic review are to present, assess, and synthesize the existing research on biofeedback in pediatric and AYA oncology, identify gaps in biofeedback research within this population, and provide recommendations for future research and clinical implications. Methods: A systematic search for articles was conducted using six bibliographic databases—PubMed/MEDLINE (NLM), EMBASE (Elsevier), CINAHL (EBSCO), SPORTDiscus (EBSCO), PsycINFO (OVID), and PEDro (NeuRA)—with an update on 5/7/2025. Included were studies involving pediatric/AYA oncology participants (0–39 years old) and those receiving at least one biofeedback modality. The methodological quality and risk of bias among included articles were assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (ROB) Tool (modified version for non-randomized studies). A narrative synthesis of included studies examined the type of cancer studied, type of biofeedback used, study designs and methodological quality, and key outcomes evaluated. Results: While the literature suggests that biofeedback may offer beneficial outcomes for managing various pediatric/AYA oncology-related symptoms, such as pain, anxiety, and fatigue, only 8 studies out of 1013 screened (<1%) met inclusion criteria. Limitations included low study quality (small sample sizes, lack of control groups, and methodological inconsistencies). Conclusions: While biofeedback shows promise as a feasible and effective intervention, there is a call to action for well-designed, methodologically rigorous studies to substantiate its effectiveness and inform evidence-based practice specifically for pediatric/AYA oncology patients and clinicians. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 3788 KiB  
Article
On-Wafer Gate Screening Test for Improved Pre-Reliability in p-GaN HEMTs
by Giovanni Giorgino, Cristina Miccoli, Marcello Cioni, Santo Reina, Tariq Wakrim, Virgil Guillon, Nossikpendou Yves Sama, Pauline Gaillard, Mohammed Zeghouane, Hyon-Ju Chauveau, Maria Eloisa Castagna, Aurore Constant, Ferdinando Iucolano and Alessandro Chini
Micromachines 2025, 16(8), 873; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16080873 - 29 Jul 2025
Viewed by 383
Abstract
In this paper, preliminary gate reliability of p-GaN HEMTs under high positive gate bias is studied. Gate robustness is of great interest both from an academic and industrial point of view; in fact, different tests and models can be explored to estimate the [...] Read more.
In this paper, preliminary gate reliability of p-GaN HEMTs under high positive gate bias is studied. Gate robustness is of great interest both from an academic and industrial point of view; in fact, different tests and models can be explored to estimate the device lifetime, which must meet some minimum product requirements, as specified by international standards (AEC Q101, JESD47, etc.). However, reliability characterizations are usually time-consuming and are performed in parallel on multiple packaged devices. Therefore, it would be useful to have a faster method to screen out weaker gate trials, already on-wafer, before reaching the packaging step. For this purpose, a room-temperature stress procedure is presented and described in detail. Then, this screening test is applied to devices with a reference gate process, and, as a result, high gate leakage degradation is observed. Afterwards, a different process implementing a dielectric layer between p-GaN and gate metal is evaluated, highlighting the improved behavior during the stress test. However, it is also observed that devices with this process suffer from very high drain leakage, and this effect is then studied and understood through TCAD (technology computer-aided design) simulations. Finally, the effect of a surface treatment performed on the p-GaN is analyzed, showing improved gate pre-reliability while maintaining low drain leakage. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue III–V Compound Semiconductors and Devices, 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 1044 KiB  
Systematic Review
Patient-Reported Outcomes in Intraoral Bone Block Augmentation Compared to GBR Procedures Prior to Implant Placement: A Systematic Review
by Sepehr Salahi, Mohamad Kamal Shaar, Jeremy Pitman, Stijn Vervaeke, Jan Cosyn, Faris Younes and Thomas De Bruyckere
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(15), 5331; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155331 - 28 Jul 2025
Viewed by 296
Abstract
Objective: To compare the effect of different bone augmentation procedures, namely, autogenous bone blocks (ABBs) versus guided bone regeneration (GBR), on patient-reported outcomes (PROMs). Methods: This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. A MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of [...] Read more.
Objective: To compare the effect of different bone augmentation procedures, namely, autogenous bone blocks (ABBs) versus guided bone regeneration (GBR), on patient-reported outcomes (PROMs). Methods: This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. A MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science search was conducted by two independent reviewers in combination with a free-hand search in relevant journals until June 2025. Outcomes were PROMs to enhance our understanding of the evolution of these procedures. Results: The electronic search yielded 6291 articles. After title screening, 67 articles were further analyzed for abstract review, which resulted in 14 articles eligible for full-text reading. Six articles were finally included based on the exclusion and inclusion criteria with a total of 295 patients. The overall study quality was low, since only two RCTs could be included. One study demonstrated a high risk of bias. Different PROMs were examined and compared such as pain, edema, neurosensory disturbance, Patient-Reported Predominant Symptom, OHIP-14, postoperative analgesic usage, willingness to repeat, and likelihood to recommend. Meta-analysis was not achievable due to a lack of direct comparisons and heterogeneity in terms of PROMs. Evaluation points varied between pretreatment and up to nearly 10-years of follow-up. Conclusions: Despite significant heterogeneity and reporting, this systematic review concluded that ABB and GBR are well-tolerated procedures. Trends such as transient postoperative pain and swelling with a minor occurring of neurosensory disturbances were reported in a few studies. Overall, a good perception of postoperative recovery was reported for both treatment modalities. Good quality of life was noted related to GBR procedures. Patient-reported outcomes were only analyzed for patients who completed the entire follow-up period. This may introduce bias, as patients who dropped out and were more likely to experience complications were not represented, potentially resulting in a more favorable portrayal of the outcomes. Further well-conducted prospective studies with a long follow-up are needed for an evidence-based evaluation and comparison of PROMs for these procedures. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Dentistry, Oral Surgery and Oral Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1480 KiB  
Systematic Review
Comparison of Dentoalveolar Changes with Miniscrew-Assisted Versus Conventional Rapid Palatal Expansion in Growing Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Hwang bin Lee, Jong-Moon Chae, Jae Hyun Park, Na Jin Kim and Sung-Hoon Han
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(15), 8326; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15158326 - 26 Jul 2025
Viewed by 187
Abstract
Background: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the dentoalveolar changes of miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion (MARPE) compared with conventional rapid palatal expansion (CRPE) in growing patients (≤16 years). Methods: A systematic and comprehensive literature search was carried out independently by two reviewers using both [...] Read more.
Background: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the dentoalveolar changes of miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion (MARPE) compared with conventional rapid palatal expansion (CRPE) in growing patients (≤16 years). Methods: A systematic and comprehensive literature search was carried out independently by two reviewers using both MeSH terms and free-text keywords across PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase, with studies published through February 2025 included. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane ROB 2.0 tool. The GRADE system was employed to determine evidence quality. Results: Of the 462 initially screened articles, 6 met the inclusion criteria and were selected for quantitative synthesis. Most studies had a low risk of bias with some concerns in reporting. The pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) for tooth inclination changes in CRPE compared with MARPE was 0.98 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.54 to 1.42; p < 0.01). The test for overall effect was significant (p < 0.01), but no significant differences were found between the subgroups. The pooled SMD for buccal bone thickness changes in CRPE compared with MARPE was 0.69 (95% CI, 0.37 to 1.00; p < 0.01). The test for overall effect was significant (p < 0.01), and there were substantial differences between the subgroups. The supporting evidence ranged in certainty from moderate to low. Conclusions: MARPE was more effective than CRPE in minimizing the buccal tipping and buccal bone loss of the maxillary first premolars and first molars. However, to further confirm these outcomes and guide evidence-based clinical practice, well-designed randomized controlled trials with long-term follow-up are necessary. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Trends and Prospects of Orthodontic Treatment, 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

28 pages, 4702 KiB  
Article
Clinical Failure of General-Purpose AI in Photographic Scoliosis Assessment: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study
by Cemre Aydin, Ozden Bedre Duygu, Asli Beril Karakas, Eda Er, Gokhan Gokmen, Anil Murat Ozturk and Figen Govsa
Medicina 2025, 61(8), 1342; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61081342 - 25 Jul 2025
Viewed by 348
Abstract
Background and Objectives: General-purpose multimodal large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for medical image interpretation despite lacking clinical validation. This study evaluates the diagnostic reliability of ChatGPT-4o and Claude 2 in photographic assessment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) against radiological standards. This [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: General-purpose multimodal large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for medical image interpretation despite lacking clinical validation. This study evaluates the diagnostic reliability of ChatGPT-4o and Claude 2 in photographic assessment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) against radiological standards. This study examines two critical questions: whether families can derive reliable preliminary assessments from LLMs through analysis of clinical photographs and whether LLMs exhibit cognitive fidelity in their visuospatial reasoning capabilities for AIS assessment. Materials and Methods: A prospective diagnostic accuracy study (STARD-compliant) analyzed 97 adolescents (74 with AIS and 23 with postural asymmetry). Standardized clinical photographs (nine views/patient) were assessed by two LLMs and two orthopedic residents against reference radiological measurements. Primary outcomes included diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity/specificity), Cobb angle concordance (Lin’s CCC), inter-rater reliability (Cohen’s κ), and measurement agreement (Bland–Altman LoA). Results: The LLMs exhibited hazardous diagnostic inaccuracy: ChatGPT misclassified all non-AIS cases (specificity 0% [95% CI: 0.0–14.8]), while Claude 2 generated 78.3% false positives. Systematic measurement errors exceeded clinical tolerance: ChatGPT overestimated thoracic curves by +10.74° (LoA: −21.45° to +42.92°), exceeding tolerance by >800%. Both LLMs showed inverse biomechanical concordance in thoracolumbar curves (CCC ≤ −0.106). Inter-rater reliability fell below random chance (ChatGPT κ = −0.039). Universal proportional bias (slopes ≈ −1.0) caused severe curve underestimation (e.g., 10–15° error for 50° deformities). Human evaluators demonstrated superior bias control (0.3–2.8° vs. 2.6–10.7°) but suboptimal specificity (21.7–26.1%) and hazardous lumbar concordance (CCC: −0.123). Conclusions: General-purpose LLMs demonstrate clinically unacceptable inaccuracy in photographic AIS assessment, contraindicating clinical deployment. Catastrophic false positives, systematic measurement errors exceeding tolerance by 480–1074%, and inverse diagnostic concordance necessitate urgent regulatory safeguards under frameworks like the EU AI Act. Neither LLMs nor photographic human assessment achieve reliability thresholds for standalone screening, mandating domain-specific algorithm development and integration of 3D modalities. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis and Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 663 KiB  
Review
Association Between Diabetes Mellitus and Head and Neck Cancer: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
by Filipa Formosinho, Alexandra Arcanjo and Maria Conceição Manso
Oral 2025, 5(3), 52; https://doi.org/10.3390/oral5030052 - 24 Jul 2025
Viewed by 1207
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Emerging evidence links diabetes to increased cancer risk. This study aimed to assess the association between diabetes mellitus (DM)(type 1, type 2, or gestational) and the development of head and neck cancer. Methods: An umbrella review was conducted using systematic searches in [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Emerging evidence links diabetes to increased cancer risk. This study aimed to assess the association between diabetes mellitus (DM)(type 1, type 2, or gestational) and the development of head and neck cancer. Methods: An umbrella review was conducted using systematic searches in Cochrane, EBSCO, Wiley, ScienceDirect, and PubMed (January 2000–January 2024), registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024512151). Included were systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs) of observational studies. Article selection followed the PRISMA guidelines; the quality and risk of bias of the selected studies were assessed with the Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist. The GROOVE tool was used to identify double counting. Two independent reviewers screened studies, with a third resolving disagreements. Results: Seven SRs were included. While DM has been widely examined in cancer research, few studies specifically targeted head and neck cancers. Of the 20 associations between various cancer sites and diabetes types, 9 (45%) showed a statistically significant positive correlation. The strongest evidence was for overall cancer risk (RR = 1.22, 95% CI: 1.16–1.29, p < 0.001). Oral cancer showed elevated risks (RRR = 1.13, p = 0.009; OR = 1.32, p < 0.001; HR = 1.73, p < 0.05; RR = 1.28, p < 0.05). Increased risks were also observed for oropharyngeal (RR = 1.18; HR = 1.53), head and neck (HR = 1.47), and nasopharyngeal cancer (OR = 1.40), all p < 0.05. Heterogeneity was low in two reviews, unreported in one, and high in four. Five SRs reported associated risk factors. Conclusions: While some associations between DM and cancer appear significant, evidence remains limited and inconsistent, particularly for oral cancer. Further standardized, high-quality research is needed to clarify the link across head and neck cancer subtypes. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1275 KiB  
Systematic Review
A Systematic Review of Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy for Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery: Updated Evidence, Context, and Clinical Implications
by Catalin Vladut Ionut Feier, Vasile Gaborean, Ionut Flaviu Faur, Razvan Constantin Vonica, Alaviana Monique Faur, Vladut Iosif Rus, Beniamin Sorin Dragan and Calin Muntean
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(15), 5191; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155191 - 22 Jul 2025
Viewed by 330
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Postoperative pancreatic fistula and post-hepatectomy liver failure remain significant complications after HPB surgery; however, superficial surgical site infection (SSI) is the most frequent wound-related complication. Closed-incision negative-pressure wound therapy (ciNPWT) has been proposed to reduce superficial contamination, yet no [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Postoperative pancreatic fistula and post-hepatectomy liver failure remain significant complications after HPB surgery; however, superficial surgical site infection (SSI) is the most frequent wound-related complication. Closed-incision negative-pressure wound therapy (ciNPWT) has been proposed to reduce superficial contamination, yet no liver-focused quantitative synthesis exists. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of prophylactic ciNPWT after hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) surgery. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, and PubMed were searched from inception to 30 April 2025. Randomized and comparative observational studies that compared ciNPWT with conventional dressings after elective liver transplantation, hepatectomy, pancreatoduodenectomy, and liver resections were eligible. Two reviewers independently screened, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias (RoB-2/ROBINS-I). A random-effects Mantel–Haenszel model generated pooled risk ratios (RRs) for superficial SSI; secondary outcomes were reported descriptively. Results: Twelve studies (seven RCTs, five cohorts) encompassing 15,212 patients (3561 ciNPWT; 11,651 control) met the inclusion criteria. Device application lasted three to seven days in all trials. The pooled analysis demonstrated a 29% relative reduction in superficial SSI with ciNPWT (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.63–0.79; p < 0.001) with negligible heterogeneity (I2 0%). Absolute risk reduction ranged from 0% to 13%, correlating positively with the baseline control-group SSI rate. Deep/organ-space SSI (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.79–1.09) and 90-day mortality (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.69–1.28) were unaffected. Seven studies documented a 1- to 3-day shorter median length of stay; only two reached statistical significance. Device-related adverse events were rare (one seroma, no skin necrosis). Conclusions: Prophylactic ciNPWT safely reduces superficial SSI after high-risk HPB surgery, with the greatest absolute benefit when baseline SSI risk exceeds ≈10%. Its influence on deep infection and mortality is negligible. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 2353 KiB  
Article
Intergrader Agreement on Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Using Ultra-Widefield Imaging: INSPIRED Study Report 1
by Eleonora Riotto, Wei-Shan Tsai, Hagar Khalid, Francesca Lamanna, Louise Roch, Medha Manoj and Sobha Sivaprasad
Diagnostics 2025, 15(14), 1831; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15141831 - 21 Jul 2025
Viewed by 326
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Discrepancies in diabetic retinopathy (DR) grading are well-documented, with retinal non-perfusion (RNP) quantification posing greater challenges. This study assessed intergrader agreement in DR evaluation, focusing on qualitative severity grading and quantitative RNP measurement. We aimed to improve agreement through structured consensus [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Discrepancies in diabetic retinopathy (DR) grading are well-documented, with retinal non-perfusion (RNP) quantification posing greater challenges. This study assessed intergrader agreement in DR evaluation, focusing on qualitative severity grading and quantitative RNP measurement. We aimed to improve agreement through structured consensus meetings. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 100 comparisons from 50 eyes (36 patients) was conducted. Two paired medical retina fellows graded ultra-widefield color fundus photographs (CFP) and fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) images. CFP assessments included DR severity using the International Clinical Diabetic Retinopathy (ICDR) grading system, DR Severity Scale (DRSS), and predominantly peripheral lesions (PPL). FFA-based RNP was defined as capillary loss with grayscale matching the foveal avascular zone. Weekly adjudication by a senior specialist resolved discrepancies. Intergrader agreement was evaluated using Cohen’s kappa (qualitative DRSS) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) (quantitative RNP). Bland–Altman analysis assessed bias and variability. Results: After eight consensus meetings, CFP grading agreement improved to excellent: kappa = 91% (ICDR DR severity), 89% (DRSS), and 89% (PPL). FFA-based PPL agreement reached 100%. For RNP, the non-perfusion index (NPI) showed moderate overall ICC (0.49), with regional ICCs ranging from 0.40 to 0.57 (highest in the nasal region, ICC = 0.57). Bland–Altman analysis revealed a mean NPI difference of 0.12 (limits: −0.11 to 0.35), indicating acceptable variability despite outliers. Conclusions: Structured consensus training achieved excellent intergrader agreement for DR severity and PPL grading, supporting the clinical reliability of ultra-widefield imaging. However, RNP measurement variability underscores the need for standardized protocols and automated tools to enhance reproducibility. This process is critical for developing robust AI-based screening systems. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Advances in Retinal Imaging)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1396 KiB  
Article
Lateral Flow Assay to Detect Carbonic Anhydrase IX in Seromas of Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma
by Peng Xu, Katerina Kourentzi, Richard Willson, Honghua Hu, Anand Deva, Christopher Campbell and Marshall Kadin
Cancers 2025, 17(14), 2405; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17142405 - 21 Jul 2025
Viewed by 383
Abstract
Background/Objective: Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) has affected more than 1700 women with textured breast implants. About 80% of patients present with fluid (seroma) around their implant. BIA-ALCL can be cured by surgery alone when confined to the seroma and lining [...] Read more.
Background/Objective: Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) has affected more than 1700 women with textured breast implants. About 80% of patients present with fluid (seroma) around their implant. BIA-ALCL can be cured by surgery alone when confined to the seroma and lining of the peri-implant capsule. To address the need for early detection, we developed a rapid point of care (POC) lateral flow assay (LFA) to identify lymphoma in seromas. Methods: We compared 28 malignant seromas to 23 benign seromas using both ELISA and LFA. LFA test lines (TL) and control lines (CL) were visualized and measured with imaging software and the TL/CL ratio for each sample was calculated. Results: By visual exam, the sensitivity for detection of CA9 was 93% and specificity 78%, while the positive predictive value was 84% and negative predictive value 90%. Quantitative image analysis increased the positive predictive value to 96% while the negative predictive value reduced to 79%. Conclusions: We conclude that CA9 is a sensitive biomarker for detection and screening of patients for BIA-ALCL in patients who present with seromas of unknown etiology. The CA9 LFA can potentially replace ELISA, flow cytometry and other tests requiring specialized equipment, highly trained personnel, larger amounts of fluid and delay in diagnosis of BIA-ALCL. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pre-Clinical Studies of Personalized Medicine for Cancer Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 391 KiB  
Systematic Review
High-Protein Dietary Interventions in Heart Failure: A Systematic Review of Clinical and Functional Outcomes
by Lorraine S. Evangelista, Rebecca Meraz, Kelly L. Wierenga, Angelina P. Nguyen, Alona D. Angosta and Jennifer Kawi
Nutrients 2025, 17(14), 2361; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17142361 - 18 Jul 2025
Viewed by 513
Abstract
Background: Heart failure (HF) is frequently associated with skeletal muscle wasting, reduced functional capacity, and malnutrition. High-protein diets offer a promising nutritional intervention to improve these outcomes in individuals with HF. Objective: This systematic review evaluated randomized controlled trials of high-protein dietary interventions [...] Read more.
Background: Heart failure (HF) is frequently associated with skeletal muscle wasting, reduced functional capacity, and malnutrition. High-protein diets offer a promising nutritional intervention to improve these outcomes in individuals with HF. Objective: This systematic review evaluated randomized controlled trials of high-protein dietary interventions in HF populations, with emphasis on intervention characteristics, quantitative benefits, and risk of bias. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search in PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL from inception to June 2025. Eligible studies enrolled adults (≥18 years) with HF, implemented high-protein regimens (≥1.1 g/kg/day or ~25–30% of energy), and reported on functional capacity, body composition, muscle strength, clinical outcomes, or biochemical markers. Two reviewers independently screened, extracted data, and assessed bias (Cochrane RoB 2). Heterogeneity in dosing, duration, and outcomes precluded meta-analysis; we therefore provide a narrative synthesis. Results: Ten trials (nine randomized controlled trials, one pilot) involving 1080 patients (median n = 38; range 21–652) were included. High-protein interventions yielded mean improvements in six-minute walk distance of +32 ± 14 m, lean body mass gain of +1.6 ± 0.9 kg, and 9 ± 4% enhancement in quality-of-life scores; muscle strength effects varied from −2% to +11%. Two studies reported an 18% reduction in HF readmissions (p < 0.05). The risk-of-bias assessment identified two low-risk, three moderate-risk, and one high-risk study. Key limitations include small sample sizes, varied protein dosing (1.1–1.5 g/kg/day), short follow-up (2–6 months), and outcome heterogeneity. Conclusions: High-protein dietary strategies appear to confer modest, clinically relevant gains in functional capacity, nutritional status, and HF readmission risk. Larger, well-powered trials with standardized dosing and longer follow-up are necessary to establish optimal protein targets, long-term efficacy, and safety. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop