Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (829)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = scintillation

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
18 pages, 3414 KB  
Article
Transmission Characteristics and Coupling Mechanisms of Gaussian Beams Under Combined Scattering and Turbulence Effects
by Liguo Wang, Yue Yu, Lei Gong, Wanjun Wang, Zhiqiang Yang, Lihong Yang and Yao Li
Photonics 2026, 13(4), 324; https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics13040324 - 26 Mar 2026
Abstract
Atmospheric laser beam propagation is typically perturbed by the dual influences of aerosol particle systems and atmospheric turbulence. This joint perturbation induces intensity fluctuations in the transmitted optical field, which significantly degrades the performance of laser-based systems. This study integrates and improves upon [...] Read more.
Atmospheric laser beam propagation is typically perturbed by the dual influences of aerosol particle systems and atmospheric turbulence. This joint perturbation induces intensity fluctuations in the transmitted optical field, which significantly degrades the performance of laser-based systems. This study integrates and improves upon existing simulation algorithms, establishing a coupled model that combines the Monte Carlo method and multi-phase screens. The model accurately characterizes optical field evolution and reveals that the impacts of scattering and turbulence on the scintillation index (SI) are not simply additive: turbulence perturbation enhances intensity fluctuations, leading to an increase in SI; however, as the energy proportion of scattered light rises, its statistical stationarity begins to dominate the optical field characteristics, stabilizing SI. Based on radiative transfer and Mie scattering theories, an analytical formula for single-scattering SI is derived, enabling direct calculation from fundamental parameters. Furthermore, a composite SI expression is established using the scattered-to-transmitted light intensity ratio. To address model deviations along the dimensions of visibility and turbulence strength, a sinusoidal compensation model and a logarithmic compensation model are proposed, respectively. Validation results verify the complementary and competitive mechanisms of scattering and turbulence in modulating intensity fluctuations. This research provides efficient theoretical tools and practical references for simulating and optimizing laser transmission in complex atmospheric environments. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Lasers, Light Sources and Sensors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 5758 KB  
Article
The Effect of Scatter Radiation on Image Resolution in Gridless Portable X-Ray Imaging: A Monte Carlo Study
by Ilias Anagnostou, Panagiotis Liaparinos, Christos Michail, Ioannis Valais, George Fountos, Ioannis Kandarakis and Nektarios Kalyvas
Appl. Sci. 2026, 16(7), 3152; https://doi.org/10.3390/app16073152 - 25 Mar 2026
Viewed by 175
Abstract
In X-ray imaging, tissue scattering is an important factor that degrades image clarity, especially using a portable gridless X-ray imaging device. This study focuses on using Monte Carlo simulation to quantify the effect of scatter radiation on image resolution, by analyzing the point [...] Read more.
In X-ray imaging, tissue scattering is an important factor that degrades image clarity, especially using a portable gridless X-ray imaging device. This study focuses on using Monte Carlo simulation to quantify the effect of scatter radiation on image resolution, by analyzing the point spread function (PSF) and the corresponding modulation transfer function (MTF). Lateral energy absorption profiles in tissue and a cesium iodide (CsI) scintillator were calculated at different X-ray tube voltages (70–90 kV) and filter configurations. Results showed that 85.7% of the total scattered radiation is concentrated at a distance of 4 cm from the central axis for the tissue and 67.37% for the CsI scintillator. The MTF remained high at low spatial frequencies (23% at 0.04 cycles/cm) but dropped at mid frequencies (0.015–0.025 at 0.3–0.6 cycles/cm) and was almost zero at high frequencies (0.004 at 0.8 cycles/cm), indicating loss of detail due to scattering. Increasing the thickness of the filter or adding a copper (Cu) filter reduced the contrast at low spatial frequencies (from 23% to 21%). The study quantitatively investigated the MTF degradation in portable X-ray imaging devices without grid, due to scatter. These results may aid in the development of scatter correction algorithms to improve image quality without the need for an anti-scatter grid. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 27032 KB  
Article
Research on Ionospheric Scintillation Effects and Prediction Model in East Asia Based on COSMIC-1 Occultation Dataset
by Yuqiang Zhang, Ting Lan, Xiang Wang, Bo Chen and Yi Liu
Universe 2026, 12(3), 86; https://doi.org/10.3390/universe12030086 - 20 Mar 2026
Viewed by 138
Abstract
In this study, the temporal and spatial distribution characteristics of ionospheric scintillation in the East Asian sector are statistically analyzed based on S4 data provided by the COSMIC-1 occultation dataset and solar–terrestrial spatial environment parameters from 2007 to 2018. The results show that [...] Read more.
In this study, the temporal and spatial distribution characteristics of ionospheric scintillation in the East Asian sector are statistically analyzed based on S4 data provided by the COSMIC-1 occultation dataset and solar–terrestrial spatial environment parameters from 2007 to 2018. The results show that scintillation activity has an obvious distribution pattern with local time: the frequency gradually increases from 17:00 in the evening, with the peak concentrated at 22:00–01:00 at night; in terms of seasonal variation, scintillation activity is highest in spring and fall, followed by summer, and lowest in winter; and, regarding annual variation, it is highly correlated with the solar activity. Further analyses show that scintillation activity is strongly correlated with geomagnetic activity. On this basis, this study constructs a two-layer LSTM deep learning model based on weighted regression to realize S4 numerical forecasting for the next 1 h in the middle- and low-latitude regions of China, using F10.7, Kp, Dst, sunspot number, solar wind vertical velocity, and historical S4 values as inputs. The model demonstrates robust predictive performance on the validation dataset containing 8760 samples, with a mean squared error of 0.00546 and an absolute error that is distributed within the interval [−0.2, 0.2] 98% of the time, indicating strong accuracy and robustness. These results suggest that the proposed model provides a high-precision tool for ionospheric scintillation warning. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Space Science)
Show Figures

Figure 1

31 pages, 3578 KB  
Review
Measurement of Percentage Depth–Dose Distributions in Clinical Dosimetry: Conventional Techniques and Emerging Sensor Technologies
by Giada Petringa, Luigi Raffaele, Giacomo Cuttone, Mariacristina Guarrera, Alma Kurmanova, Roberto Catalano and Giuseppe Antonio Pablo Cirrone
Sensors 2026, 26(6), 1908; https://doi.org/10.3390/s26061908 - 18 Mar 2026
Viewed by 217
Abstract
Percentage depth–dose (PDD) distributions are fundamental to characterizing radiation beams in radiotherapy. This review provides an overview of both methods and sensor technologies for measuring PDD in photon, electron, proton, and carbon-ion beams. We summarize conventional dosimetry techniques, including water-phantom scanning with ionization [...] Read more.
Percentage depth–dose (PDD) distributions are fundamental to characterizing radiation beams in radiotherapy. This review provides an overview of both methods and sensor technologies for measuring PDD in photon, electron, proton, and carbon-ion beams. We summarize conventional dosimetry techniques, including water-phantom scanning with ionization chambers (cylindrical and parallel-plate) and radiochromic film, and discuss their strengths (established accuracy, calibration traceability) and limitations (volume averaging, delayed readout). We then examine emerging sensor technologies designed to improve spatial resolution, speed, and radiation hardness: multi-layer ionization chambers and Faraday cups for one-shot PDD acquisition; scintillator-based detectors (liquid, plastic, and fiber-optic) enabling real-time and high-resolution depth–dose measurements; advanced semiconductor detectors including silicon carbide diodes; as well as novel approaches such as ionoacoustic range sensing for proton beams. For each modality and detector type, we emphasize clinical relevance, measurement accuracy, spatial resolution, radiation durability, and suitability for high dose-per-pulse environments (e.g., FLASH radiotherapy). Current challenges, such as detector response in regions of steep dose gradient, saturation or recombination at ultra-high dose rates, and energy-dependent sensitivity in mixed radiation fields, are analyzed in detail. We also highlight the limitations of each technique and discuss ongoing improvements and prospects for clinical implementation. In summary, no single detector technology fully satisfies all requirements for fast, high-accuracy, high-resolution, radiation-hard PDD measurement, but the integration of emerging sensor innovations into clinical dosimetry promises to enhance the precision and efficiency of radiotherapy quality assurance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Sensors for Human Health Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

33 pages, 35113 KB  
Article
Operation of a Modular 3D-Pixelated Liquid Argon Time-Projection Chamber in a Neutrino Beam
by S. Abbaslu, A. Abed Abud, R. Acciarri, L. P. Accorsi, M. A. Acero, M. R. Adames, G. Adamov, M. Adamowski, C. Adriano, F. Akbar, F. Alemanno, N. S. Alex, K. Allison, M. Alrashed, A. Alton, R. Alvarez, T. Alves, A. Aman, H. Amar, P. Amedo, J. Anderson, D. A. Andrade, C. Andreopoulos, M. Andreotti, M. P. Andrews, F. Andrianala, S. Andringa, F. Anjarazafy, S. Ansarifard, D. Antic, M. Antoniassi, A. Aranda-Fernandez, L. Arellano, E. Arrieta Diaz, M. A. Arroyave, M. Arteropons, J. Asaadi, M. Ascencio, A. Ashkenazi, D. Asner, L. Asquith, E. Atkin, D. Auguste, A. Aurisano, V. Aushev, D. Autiero, D. Ávila Gómez, M. B. Azam, F. Azfar, A. Back, J. J. Back, Y. Bae, I. Bagaturia, L. Bagby, D. Baigarashev, S. Balasubramanian, A. Balboni, P. Baldi, W. Baldini, J. Baldonedo, B. Baller, B. Bambah, F. Barao, D. Barbu, G. Barenboim, P. B̃arham Alzás, G. J. Barker, W. Barkhouse, G. Barr, A. Barros, N. Barros, D. Barrow, J. L. Barrow, A. Basharina-Freshville, A. Bashyal, V. Basque, M. Bassani, D. Basu, C. Batchelor, L. Bathe-Peters, J. B. R. Battat, F. Battisti, J. Bautista, F. Bay, J. L. L. Bazo Alba, J. F. Beacom, E. Bechetoille, B. Behera, E. Belchior, B. Bell, G. Bell, L. Bellantoni, G. Bellettini, V. Bellini, O. Beltramello, A. Belyaev, C. Benitez Montiel, D. Benjamin, F. Bento Neves, J. Berger, S. Berkman, J. Bermudez, J. Bernal, P. Bernardini, A. Bersani, E. Bertholet, E. Bertolini, S. Bertolucci, M. Betancourt, A. Betancur Rodríguez, Y. Bezawada, A. T. Bezerra, A. Bhat, V. Bhatnagar, M. Bhattacharjee, S. Bhattacharjee, M. Bhattacharya, S. Bhuller, B. Bhuyan, S. Biagi, J. Bian, K. Biery, B. Bilki, M. Bishai, A. Blake, F. D. Blaszczyk, G. C. Blazey, E. Blucher, B. Bogart, J. Boissevain, S. Bolognesi, T. Bolton, L. Bomben, M. Bonesini, C. Bonilla-Diaz, A. Booth, F. Boran, R. Borges Merlo, N. Bostan, G. Botogoske, B. Bottino, R. Bouet, J. Boza, J. Bracinik, B. Brahma, D. Brailsford, F. Bramati, A. Branca, A. Brandt, J. Bremer, S. J. Brice, V. Brio, C. Brizzolari, C. Bromberg, J. Brooke, A. Bross, G. Brunetti, M. B. Brunetti, N. Buchanan, H. Budd, J. Buergi, A. Bundock, D. Burgardt, S. Butchart, G. Caceres V., R. Calabrese, R. Calabrese, J. Calcutt, L. Calivers, E. Calvo, A. Caminata, A. F. Camino, W. Campanelli, A. Campani, A. Campos Benitez, N. Canci, J. Capó, I. Caracas, D. Caratelli, D. Carber, J. M. Carceller, G. Carini, B. Carlus, M. F. Carneiro, P. Carniti, I. Caro Terrazas, H. Carranza, N. Carrara, L. Carroll, T. Carroll, A. Carter, E. Casarejos, D. Casazza, J. F. Castaño Forero, F. A. Castaño, C. Castromonte, E. Catano-Mur, C. Cattadori, F. Cavalier, F. Cavanna, S. Centro, G. Cerati, C. Cerna, A. Cervelli, A. Cervera Villanueva, J. Chakrani, M. Chalifour, A. Chappell, A. Chatterjee, B. Chauhan, C. Chavez Barajas, H. Chen, M. Chen, W. C. Chen, Y. Chen, Z. Chen, D. Cherdack, S. S. Chhibra, C. Chi, F. Chiapponi, R. Chirco, N. Chitirasreemadam, K. Cho, S. Choate, G. Choi, D. Chokheli, P. S. Chong, B. Chowdhury, D. Christian, M. Chung, E. Church, M. F. Cicala, M. Cicerchia, V. Cicero, R. Ciolini, P. Clarke, G. Cline, A. G. Cocco, J. A. B. Coelho, A. Cohen, J. Collazo, J. Collot, H. Combs, J. M. Conrad, L. Conti, T. Contreras, M. Convery, K. Conway, S. Copello, P. Cova, C. Cox, L. Cremonesi, J. I. Crespo-Anadón, M. Crisler, E. Cristaldo, J. Crnkovic, G. Crone, R. Cross, A. Cudd, C. Cuesta, Y. Cui, F. Curciarello, D. Cussans, J. Dai, O. Dalager, W. Dallaway, R. D’Amico, H. da Motta, Z. A. Dar, R. Darby, L. Da Silva Peres, Q. David, G. S. Davies, S. Davini, J. Dawson, R. De Aguiar, P. Debbins, M. P. Decowski, A. de Gouvêa, P. C. De Holanda, P. De Jong, P. Del Amo Sanchez, G. De Lauretis, A. Delbart, M. Delgado, A. Dell’Acqua, G. Delle Monache, N. Delmonte, P. De Lurgio, R. Demario, G. De Matteis, J. R. T. de Mello Neto, A. P. A. De Mendonca, D. M. DeMuth, S. Dennis, C. Densham, P. Denton, G. W. Deptuch, A. De Roeck, V. De Romeri, J. P. Detje, J. Devine, K. Dhanmeher, R. Dharmapalan, M. Dias, A. Diaz, J. S. Díaz, F. Díaz, F. Di Capua, A. Di Domenico, S. Di Domizio, S. Di Falco, L. Di Giulio, P. Ding, L. Di Noto, E. Diociaiuti, G. Di Sciascio, V. Di Silvestre, C. Distefano, R. Di Stefano, R. Diurba, M. Diwan, Z. Djurcic, S. Dolan, M. Dolce, M. J. Dolinski, D. Domenici, S. Dominguez, S. Donati, S. Doran, D. Douglas, T. A. Doyle, F. Drielsma, D. Duchesneau, K. Duffy, K. Dugas, P. Dunne, B. Dutta, D. A. Dwyer, A. S. Dyshkant, S. Dytman, M. Eads, A. Earle, S. Edayath, D. Edmunds, J. Eisch, W. Emark, P. Englezos, A. Ereditato, T. Erjavec, C. O. Escobar, J. J. Evans, E. Ewart, A. C. Ezeribe, K. Fahey, A. Falcone, M. Fani’, D. Faragher, C. Farnese, Y. Farzan, J. Felix, Y. Feng, M. Ferreira da Silva, G. Ferry, E. Fialova, L. Fields, P. Filip, A. Filkins, F. Filthaut, G. Fiorillo, M. Fiorini, S. Fogarty, W. Foreman, J. Fowler, J. Franc, K. Francis, D. Franco, J. Franklin, J. Freeman, J. Fried, A. Friedland, M. Fucci, S. Fuess, I. K. Furic, K. Furman, A. P. Furmanski, R. Gaba, A. Gabrielli, A. M Gago, F. Galizzi, H. Gallagher, M. Galli, N. Gallice, V. Galymov, E. Gamberini, T. Gamble, R. Gandhi, S. Ganguly, F. Gao, S. Gao, D. Garcia-Gamez, M. Á. García-Peris, S. Gardiner, A. Gartman, A. Gauch, P. Gauzzi, S. Gazzana, G. Ge, N. Geffroy, B. Gelli, S. Gent, L. Gerlach, A. Ghosh, T. Giammaria, D. Gibin, I. Gil-Botella, A. Gioiosa, S. Giovannella, A. K. Giri, V. Giusti, D. Gnani, O. Gogota, S. Gollapinni, K. Gollwitzer, R. A. Gomes, L. S. Gomez Fajardo, D. Gonzalez-Diaz, J. Gonzalez-Santome, M. C. Goodman, S. Goswami, C. Gotti, J. Goudeau, C. Grace, E. Gramellini, R. Gran, P. Granger, C. Grant, D. R. Gratieri, G. Grauso, P. Green, S. Greenberg, W. C. Griffith, K. Grzelak, L. Gu, W. Gu, V. Guarino, M. Guarise, R. Guenette, M. Guerzoni, D. Guffanti, A. Guglielmi, F. Y. Guo, A. Gupta, V. Gupta, G. Gurung, D. Gutierrez, P. Guzowski, M. M. Guzzo, S. Gwon, A. Habig, L. Haegel, R. Hafeji, L. Hagaman, A. Hahn, J. Hakenmüller, T. Hamernik, P. Hamilton, J. Hancock, M. Handley, F. Happacher, B. Harris, D. A. Harris, L. Harris, A. L. Hart, J. Hartnell, T. Hartnett, J. Harton, T. Hasegawa, C. M. Hasnip, R. Hatcher, S. Hawkins, J. Hays, M. He, A. Heavey, K. M. Heeger, A. Heindel, J. Heise, P. Hellmuth, L. Henderson, K. Herner, V. Hewes, A. Higuera, A. Himmel, E. Hinkle, L. R. Hirsch, J. Ho, J. Hoefken Zink, J. Hoff, A. Holin, T. Holvey, C. Hong, S. Horiuchi, G. A. Horton-Smith, R. Hosokawa, T. Houdy, B. Howard, R. Howell, I. Hristova, M. S. Hronek, H. Hua, J. Huang, R. G. Huang, X. Huang, Z. Hulcher, A. Hussain, G. Iles, N. Ilic, A. M. Iliescu, R. Illingworth, G. Ingratta, A. Ioannisian, M. Ismerio Oliveira, C. M. Jackson, V. Jain, E. James, W. Jang, B. Jargowsky, D. Jena, I. Jentz, C. Jiang, J. Jiang, A. Jipa, J. H. Jo, F. R. Joaquim, W. Johnson, C. Jollet, R. Jones, N. Jovancevic, M. Judah, C. K. Jung, K. Y. Jung, T. Junk, Y. Jwa, M. Kabirnezhad, A. C. Kaboth, I. Kadenko, O. Kalikulov, D. Kalra, M. Kandemir, S. Kar, G. Karagiorgi, G. Karaman, A. Karcher, Y. Karyotakis, S. P. Kasetti, L. Kashur, A. Kauther, N. Kazaryan, L. Ke, E. Kearns, P. T. Keener, K. J. Kelly, R. Keloth, E. Kemp, O. Kemularia, Y. Kermaidic, W. Ketchum, S. H. Kettell, N. Khan, A. Khvedelidze, D. Kim, J. Kim, M. J. Kim, S. Kim, B. King, M. King, M. Kirby, A. Kish, J. Klein, J. Kleykamp, A. Klustova, T. Kobilarcik, L. Koch, K. Koehler, L. W. Koerner, D. H. Koh, M. Kordosky, T. Kosc, V. A. Kostelecký, I. Kotler, W. Krah, R. Kralik, M. Kramer, F. Krennrich, T. Kroupova, S. Kubota, M. Kubu, V. A. Kudryavtsev, G. Kufatty, S. Kuhlmann, A. Kumar, J. Kumar, M. Kumar, P. Kumar, P. Kumar, S. Kumaran, J. Kunzmann, V. Kus, T. Kutter, J. Kvasnicka, T. Labree, M. Lachat, T. Lackey, I. Lalău, A. Lambert, B. J. Land, C. E. Lane, N. Lane, K. Lang, T. Langford, M. Langstaff, F. Lanni, J. Larkin, P. Lasorak, D. Last, A. Laundrie, G. Laurenti, E. Lavaut, H. Lay, I. Lazanu, R. LaZur, M. Lazzaroni, S. Leardini, J. Learned, T. LeCompte, G. Lehmann Miotto, R. Lehnert, M. Leitner, H. Lemoine, D. Leon Silverio, L. M. Lepin, J.-Y. Li, S. W. Li, Y. Li, R. Lima, C. S. Lin, D. Lindebaum, S. Linden, R. A. Lineros, A. Lister, B. R. Littlejohn, J. Liu, Y. Liu, S. Lockwitz, I. Lomidze, K. Long, J. Lopez, I. López de Rego, N. López-March, J. M. LoSecco, A. Lozano Sanchez, X.-G. Lu, K. B. Luk, X. Luo, E. Luppi, A. A. Machado, P. Machado, C. T. Macias, J. R. Macier, M. MacMahon, S. Magill, C. Magueur, K. Mahn, A. Maio, N. Majeed, A. Major, K. Majumdar, A. Malige, S. Mameli, M. Man, R. C. Mandujano, J. Maneira, S. Manly, K. Manolopoulos, M. Manrique Plata, S. Manthey Corchado, L. Manzanillas-Velez, E. Mao, M. Marchan, A. Marchionni, D. Marfatia, C. Mariani, J. Maricic, F. Marinho, A. D. Marino, T. Markiewicz, F. Das Chagas Marques, M. Marshak, C. M. Marshall, J. Marshall, L. Martina, J. Martín-Albo, D. A. Martinez Caicedo, M. Martinez-Casales, F. Martínez López, S. Martynenko, V. Mascagna, A. Mastbaum, M. Masud, F. Matichard, G. Matteucci, J. Matthews, C. Mauger, N. Mauri, K. Mavrokoridis, I. Mawby, F. Mayhew, T. McAskill, N. McConkey, B. McConnell, K. S. McFarland, C. McGivern, C. McGrew, A. McNab, C. McNulty, J. Mead, L. Meazza, V. C. N. Meddage, A. Medhi, M. Mehmood, B. Mehta, P. Mehta, F. Mei, P. Melas, L. Mellet, T. C. D. Melo, O. Mena, H. Mendez, D. P. Méndez, A. Menegolli, G. Meng, A. C. E. A. Mercuri, A. Meregaglia, M. D. Messier, S. Metallo, W. Metcalf, M. Mewes, H. Meyer, T. Miao, J. Micallef, A. Miccoli, G. Michna, R. Milincic, F. Miller, G. Miller, W. Miller, A. Minotti, L. Miralles Verge, C. Mironov, S. Miscetti, C. S. Mishra, P. Mishra, S. R. Mishra, D. Mladenov, I. Mocioiu, A. Mogan, R. Mohanta, T. A. Mohayai, N. Mokhov, J. Molina, L. Molina Bueno, E. Montagna, A. Montanari, C. Montanari, D. Montanari, D. Montanino, L. M. Montaño Zetina, M. Mooney, A. F. Moor, M. Moore, Z. Moore, D. Moreno, G. Moreno-Granados, O. Moreno-Palacios, L. Morescalchi, C. Morris, E. Motuk, C. A. Moura, G. Mouster, W. Mu, L. Mualem, J. Mueller, M. Muether, A. Muir, Y. Mukhamejanov, A. Mukhamejanova, M. Mulhearn, D. Munford, L. J. Munteanu, H. Muramatsu, J. Muraz, M. Murphy, T. Murphy, A. Mytilinaki, J. Nachtman, Y. Nagai, S. Nagu, D. Naples, S. Narita, J. Nava, A. Navrer-Agasson, N. Nayak, M. Nebot-Guinot, A. Nehm, J. K. Nelson, O. Neogi, J. Nesbit, M. Nessi, D. Newbold, M. Newcomer, D. Newmark, R. Nichol, F. Nicolas-Arnaldos, A. Nielsen, A. Nikolica, J. Nikolov, E. Niner, X. Ning, K. Nishimura, A. Norman, A. Norrick, P. Novella, A. Nowak, J. A. Nowak, M. Oberling, J. P. Ochoa-Ricoux, S. Oh, S. B. Oh, A. Olivier, T. Olson, Y. Onel, Y. Onishchuk, A. Oranday, M. Osbiston, J. A. Osorio Vélez, L. O’Sullivan, L. Otiniano Ormachea, L. Pagani, G. Palacio, O. Palamara, S. Palestini, J. M. Paley, M. Pallavicini, C. Palomares, S. Pan, M. Panareo, P. Panda, V. Pandey, W. Panduro Vazquez, E. Pantic, V. Paolone, A. Papadopoulou, R. Papaleo, D. Papoulias, S. Paramesvaran, J. Park, S. Parke, S. Parsa, S. Parveen, M. Parvu, D. Pasciuto, S. Pascoli, L. Pasqualini, J. Pasternak, G. Patel, J. L. Paton, C. Patrick, L. Patrizii, R. B. Patterson, T. Patzak, A. Paudel, J. Paul, L. Paulucci, Z. Pavlovic, G. Pawloski, D. Payne, A. Peake, V. Pec, E. Pedreschi, S. J. M. Peeters, W. Pellico, E. Pennacchio, A. Penzo, O. L. G. Peres, Y. F. Perez Gonzalez, L. Pérez-Molina, C. Pernas, J. Perry, D. Pershey, G. Pessina, G. Petrillo, C. Petta, R. Petti, M. Pfaff, V. Pia, G. M. Piacentino, L. Pickering, L. Pierini, F. Pietropaolo, V. L. Pimentel, G. Pinaroli, S. Pincha, J. Pinchault, K. Pitts, P. Plesniak, K. Pletcher, K. Plows, C. Pollack, T. Pollmann, F. Pompa, X. Pons, N. Poonthottathil, V. Popov, F. Poppi, J. Porter, L. G. Porto Paixão, M. Potekhin, M. Pozzato, R. Pradhan, T. Prakash, M. Prest, F. Psihas, D. Pugnere, D. Pullia, X. Qian, J. Queen, J. L. Raaf, M. Rabelhofer, V. Radeka, J. Rademacker, F. Raffaelli, A. Rafique, A. Rahe, S. Rajagopalan, M. Rajaoalisoa, I. Rakhno, L. Rakotondravohitra, M. A. Ralaikoto, L. Ralte, M. A. Ramirez Delgado, B. Ramson, S. S. Randriamanampisoa, A. Rappoldi, G. Raselli, T. Rath, P. Ratoff, R. Ray, H. Razafinime, R. F. Razakamiandra, E. M. Rea, J. S. Real, B. Rebel, R. Rechenmacher, J. Reichenbacher, S. D. Reitzner, E. Renner, S. Repetto, S. Rescia, F. Resnati, C. Reynolds, M. Ribas, S. Riboldi, C. Riccio, G. Riccobene, J. S. Ricol, M. Rigan, A. Rikalo, E. V. Rincón, A. Ritchie-Yates, D. Rivera, A. Robert, A. Roberts, E. Robles, M. Roda, D. Rodas Rodríguez, M. J. O. Rodrigues, J. Rodriguez Rondon, S. Rosauro-Alcaraz, P. Rosier, D. Ross, M. Rossella, M. Ross-Lonergan, T. Rotsy, N. Roy, P. Roy, P. Roy, C. Rubbia, D. Rudik, A. Ruggeri, G. Ruiz Ferreira, K. Rushiya, B. Russell, S. Sacerdoti, N. Saduyev, S. K. Sahoo, N. Sahu, S. Sakhiyev, P. Sala, G. Salmoria, S. Samanta, M. C. Sanchez, A. Sánchez-Castillo, P. Sanchez-Lucas, D. A. Sanders, S. Sanfilippo, D. Santoro, N. Saoulidou, P. Sapienza, I. Sarcevic, I. Sarra, G. Savage, V. Savinov, G. Scanavini, A. Scanu, A. Scaramelli, T. Schefke, H. Schellman, S. Schifano, P. Schlabach, D. Schmitz, A. W. Schneider, K. Scholberg, A. Schroeder, A. Schukraft, B. Schuld, S. Schwartz, A. Segade, E. Segreto, A. Selyunin, C. R. Senise, J. Sensenig, S. H. Seo, D. Seppela, M. H. Shaevitz, P. Shanahan, P. Sharma, R. Kumar, S. Sharma Poudel, K. Shaw, T. Shaw, K. Shchablo, J. Shen, C. Shepherd-Themistocleous, J. Shi, W. Shi, S. Shin, S. Shivakoti, A. Shmakov, I. Shoemaker, D. Shooltz, R. Shrock, M. Siden, J. Silber, L. Simard, J. Sinclair, G. Sinev, Jaydip Singh, J. Singh, L. Singh, P. Singh, V. Singh, S. Singh Chauhan, R. Sipos, C. Sironneau, G. Sirri, K. Siyeon, K. Skarpaas, J. Smedley, J. Smith, P. Smith, J. Smolik, M. Smy, M. Snape, E. L. Snider, P. Snopok, M. Soares Nunes, H. Sobel, M. Soderberg, H. Sogarwal, C. J. Solano Salinas, S. Söldner-Rembold, N. Solomey, V. Solovov, W. E. Sondheim, M. Sorbara, M. Sorel, J. Soto-Oton, A. Sousa, K. Soustruznik, D. Souza Correia, F. Spinella, J. Spitz, N. J. C. Spooner, D. Stalder, M. Stancari, L. Stanco, J. Steenis, R. Stein, H. M. Steiner, A. F. Steklain Lisbôa, J. Stewart, B. Stillwell, J. Stock, T. Stokes, T. Strauss, L. Strigari, A. Stuart, J. G. Suarez, J. Subash, A. Surdo, L. Suter, A. Sutton, K. Sutton, Y. Suvorov, R. Svoboda, S. K. Swain, C. Sweeney, B. Szczerbinska, A. M. Szelc, A. Sztuc, A. Taffara, N. Talukdar, J. Tamara, H. A. Tanaka, S. Tang, N. Taniuchi, A. M. Tapia Casanova, A. Tapper, S. Tariq, E. Tatar, R. Tayloe, A. M. Teklu, K. Tellez Giron Flores, J. Tena Vidal, P. Tennessen, M. Tenti, K. Terao, F. Terranova, G. Testera, T. Thakore, A. Thea, S. Thomas, A. Thompson, C. Thorpe, S. C. Timm, E. Tiras, V. Tishchenko, S. Tiwari, N. Todorović, L. Tomassetti, A. Tonazzo, D. Torbunov, D. Torres Muñoz, M. Torti, M. Tortola, Y. Torun, N. Tosi, D. Totani, M. Toups, C. Touramanis, V. Trabattoni, D. Tran, J. Trevor, E. Triller, S. Trilov, D. Trotta, J. Truchon, D. Truncali, W. H. Trzaska, Y. Tsai, Y.-T. Tsai, Z. Tsamalaidze, K. V. Tsang, N. Tsverava, S. Z. Tu, S. Tufanli, C. Tunnell, J. Turner, M. Tuzi, M. Tzanov, M. A. Uchida, J. Ureña González, J. Urheim, T. Usher, H. Utaegbulam, S. Uzunyan, M. R. Vagins, P. Vahle, G. A. Valdiviesso, E. Valencia, R. Valentim, Z. Vallari, E. Vallazza, J. W. F. Valle, R. Van Berg, D. V. Forero, A. Vannozzi, M. Van Nuland-Troost, F. Varanini, D. Vargas Oliva, N. Vaughan, K. Vaziri, A. Vázquez-Ramos, J. Vega, J. Vences, S. Ventura, A. Verdugo, M. Verzocchi, K. Vetter, M. Vicenzi, H. Vieira de Souza, C. Vignoli, C. Vilela, E. Villa, S. Viola, B. Viren, G. V. Stenico, R. Vizarreta, A. P. Vizcaya Hernandez, S. Vlachos, G. Vorobyev, Q. Vuong, A. V. Waldron, L. Walker, H. Wallace, M. Wallach, J. Walsh, T. Walton, L. Wan, B. Wang, H. Wang, J. Wang, M. H. L. S. Wang, X. Wang, Y. Wang, D. Warner, L. Warsame, M. O. Wascko, D. Waters, A. Watson, K. Wawrowska, A. Weber, C. M. Weber, M. Weber, H. Wei, A. Weinstein, S. Westerdale, M. Wetstein, K. Whalen, A. J. White, L. H. Whitehead, D. Whittington, F. Wieler, J. Wilhlemi, M. J. Wilking, A. Wilkinson, C. Wilkinson, F. Wilson, R. J. Wilson, P. Winter, J. Wolcott, J. Wolfs, T. Wongjirad, A. Wood, K. Wood, E. Worcester, M. Worcester, K. Wresilo, M. Wright, M. Wrobel, S. Wu, W. Wu, Z. Wu, M. Wurm, J. Wyenberg, B. M. Wynne, Y. Xiao, I. Xiotidis, B. Yaeggy, N. Yahlali, E. Yandel, G. Yang, J. Yang, T. Yang, A. Yankelevich, L. Yates, U. Yevarouskaya, K. Yonehara, T. Young, B. Yu, H. Yu, J. Yu, W. Yuan, M. Zabloudil, R. Zaki, J. Zalesak, L. Zambelli, B. Zamorano, A. Zani, O. Zapata, L. Zazueta, G. P. Zeller, J. Zennamo, J. Zettlemoyer, K. Zeug, C. Zhang, S. Zhang, Y. Zhang, L. Zhao, M. Zhao, E. D. Zimmerman, S. Zucchelli, V. Zutshi, R. Zwaska and On behalf of the DUNE Collaborationadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Instruments 2026, 10(1), 18; https://doi.org/10.3390/instruments10010018 - 17 Mar 2026
Viewed by 397
Abstract
The 2x2 Demonstrator, a prototype for the Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE) liquid argon (LAr) Near Detector, was exposed to the Neutrinos from the Main Injector (NuMI) neutrino beam at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (Fermilab). This detector is a prototype of a new [...] Read more.
The 2x2 Demonstrator, a prototype for the Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE) liquid argon (LAr) Near Detector, was exposed to the Neutrinos from the Main Injector (NuMI) neutrino beam at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (Fermilab). This detector is a prototype of a new modular design for a liquid argon time-projection chamber (LArTPC), comprising a two-by-two array of four modules, each further segmented into two optically isolated LArTPCs. The 2x2 Demonstrator features a number of pioneering technologies, including a low-profile resistive field shell to establish drift fields, native 3D ionization pixelated imaging, and a high-coverage dielectric light readout system. The 2.4-tonne active mass detector is flanked upstream and downstream by supplemental solid-scintillator tracking planes, repurposed from the MINERvA experiment, which track ionizing particles exiting the argon volume. The antineutrino beam data collected by the detector over a 4.5 day period in 2024 include over 30,000 neutrino interactions in the LAr active volume—the first neutrino interactions reported by a DUNE detector prototype. During its physics-quality run, the 2x2 Demonstrator operated at a nominal drift field of 500 V/cm and maintained good LAr purity, with a stable electron lifetime of approximately 1.25 ms. This paper describes the detector and supporting systems, summarizes the installation and commissioning, and presents the initial validation of collected NuMI beam and off-beam self-triggers. In addition, it highlights observed interactions in the detector volume, including candidate muon antineutrino events. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 10373 KB  
Article
Ionospheric Scintillation Anomalies from COSMIC-2 GNSS-RO from 2019 and 2024 as Potential Earthquake Precursors
by Badr-Eddine Boudriki Semlali, Carlos Molina, Hyuk Park and Adriano Camps
ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2026, 15(3), 128; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi15030128 - 15 Mar 2026
Viewed by 293
Abstract
Currently, there are no consistent earthquake precursors for early warning. However, the correlation between earthquakes and ionospheric scintillation, measured using the S4 index via GNSS-RO, is under active study. This research analyzes S4 anomalies as a potential earthquake proxy, using GNSS-RO [...] Read more.
Currently, there are no consistent earthquake precursors for early warning. However, the correlation between earthquakes and ionospheric scintillation, measured using the S4 index via GNSS-RO, is under active study. This research analyzes S4 anomalies as a potential earthquake proxy, using GNSS-RO data from COSMIC-2/TGRS (Tri-GNSS Radio Occultation System) collected from 2019 to 2024. It examines over 71,000 global earthquakes within ±60° of the equator with magnitudes greater than 4. The quality of S4 anomalies has been enhanced by filtering out space-weather-induced disturbances using the daily planetary geomagnetic index (Kp) and the solar activity flag collected from ground stations. The S4 anomalies were calculated using robust statistical methods, such as the standard deviation and the interquartile range. This study evaluated the correlation with a confusion matrix, a receiver operating characteristic curve, and various figures of merit. The results demonstrated a promising positive S4 anomaly between 1 and 7 days before the analyzed earthquakes, indicating the potential of ionospheric scintillation as an earthquake precursor, with the robust statistical methods employed instilling confidence in the validity of our findings. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 3380 KB  
Article
Novel Sampling and Sample Preparation Systems with Industrial Validation for Biomass–Coal Co-Combustion Ratios Based on 14C Determination
by Pu Li, Zhongyang Luo, Xiaohuan Wang, Yinchen Wang, Chunjiang Yu, Zhiyang Yu, Shanhu Lin and Shenming Ran
Energies 2026, 19(6), 1474; https://doi.org/10.3390/en19061474 - 15 Mar 2026
Viewed by 319
Abstract
Focusing on enhancing the performance of the 14C method in determining biomass–coal co-combustion ratios, this study developed two novel sample preparation systems: a direct flue gas injection benzene synthesis system based on Liquid Scintillation Counting (LSC) and a direct flue gas sealing [...] Read more.
Focusing on enhancing the performance of the 14C method in determining biomass–coal co-combustion ratios, this study developed two novel sample preparation systems: a direct flue gas injection benzene synthesis system based on Liquid Scintillation Counting (LSC) and a direct flue gas sealing graphitization system based on Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (AMS). These systems reduced sample preparation time from 20–24 h to 6–8 h. Experimental validation showed relative errors in biomass blending ratios (1–40%) below ±4% for LSC and ±3% for AMS, except at the 1% blending condition. Compared with conventional methods, both accuracy and efficiency were significantly improved. An enhanced 14C-based industrial measurement scheme was established and successfully applied for monitoring biomass blending ratios (15–50%) in industrial facilities. Deviations between AMS and LSC were within ±3%, confirming the method’s accuracy, despite discrepancies with the Distributed Control System (DCS) estimates. Additionally, predictive formulas for 14C activity in biomass and air CO2 reduced economic investment, with relative errors from ±0.04% to ±3.25%. Overall, the new scheme improved accuracy by 50%, efficiency by 60%, and reduced detection costs by 60–80%, demonstrating feasibility and practical value for industrial applications. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Energy Systems: Progress, Challenges and Prospects)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

14 pages, 4713 KB  
Article
Investigation of the Microstructure and Scintillation Properties of Ce-Doped CaF2/LiF Eutectics for Thermal Neutron Detection
by Tomoaki Matsuyama, Kei Kamada, Masao Yoshino, Rikito Murakami, Satoshi Ishizawa, Yuui Yokota and Akira Yoshikawa
Materials 2026, 19(6), 1102; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19061102 - 12 Mar 2026
Viewed by 216
Abstract
With the growing global emphasis on nuclear reactor decommissioning, reliable thermal neutron detection has become increasingly important for ensuring critical safety and for the identification of fuel debris and radioactive waste. In this context, this study developed and characterized a Ce-doped CaF2 [...] Read more.
With the growing global emphasis on nuclear reactor decommissioning, reliable thermal neutron detection has become increasingly important for ensuring critical safety and for the identification of fuel debris and radioactive waste. In this context, this study developed and characterized a Ce-doped CaF2/6LiF (Ce:CaF2/LiF) eutectic scintillator for thermal neutron detection with Ce concentrations ranging from 0.5 to 10 mol%. The eutectic samples were grown by the melt-solidification method, and their crystalline properties were evaluated using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, and field-emission electron probe microanalysis. Radioluminescence, photoluminescence, transmittance, scintillation decay, and pulse-height measurements were conducted to assess their scintillation performance. Structural characterization revealed a well-defined eutectic microstructure together with several Ce-rich phases. The results of the effective neutron sensitivity demonstrated that the Ce concentration was effectively optimized based on the effective neutron sensitivity: the sample with 1 mol% Ce exhibited the highest neutron sensitivity (approximately 1.5 times that of a Ce:LiCaAlF6 single crystal) and a 1.6-times higher neutron-induced light yield, while maintaining a fast effective decay time of 400 ns. These findings suggest that the Ce:CaF2/LiF eutectic is a promising candidate for high-performance thermal-neutron scintillators for applications in nuclear decommissioning. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Optical and Photonic Materials)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

36 pages, 19472 KB  
Article
Optimised SBAS Ground Segment for Colombia Using Traffic and Ionospheric Risk Models
by Jaime Enrique Orduy, Sebastian Valencia, Felipe Rodriguez, Cristian Lozano, Juan Mosquera and Christian Rincon
Aerospace 2026, 13(3), 264; https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace13030264 - 11 Mar 2026
Viewed by 374
Abstract
This paper presents the design, optimization, and performance evaluation of a Satellite-Based Augmentation System (SBAS) ground segment tailored to Colombia’s air navigation infrastructure, with emphasis on ionospheric anomalies in equatorial latitudes. The configuration comprises six Reference Stations (RIMS), strategically sited via geometric dilution [...] Read more.
This paper presents the design, optimization, and performance evaluation of a Satellite-Based Augmentation System (SBAS) ground segment tailored to Colombia’s air navigation infrastructure, with emphasis on ionospheric anomalies in equatorial latitudes. The configuration comprises six Reference Stations (RIMS), strategically sited via geometric dilution of precision (GDOP) minimization and airspace demand models from ADS-B data. A simulation suite—integrating STK®, Radio Mobile™, and Stanford-ESA certified monitors—quantifies service volume, link margins, and protection level compliance. Ionospheric threat characterization uses regional scintillation datasets (σln ≈ 0.36, ROTI95 ≈ 85 mm/km), informing GIVE inflation and dual-frequency pseudorange integrity validation. Simulations confirm the system sustains ≥ 99.8% APV-I availability over the CAR/SAM FIR, with Horizontal and Vertical Protection Levels (HPL/VPL) bounded below 28 m and 46 m. Uplink integrity and GEO broadcast continuity are modelled under worst-case masking and multipath, confirming ICAO Annex 10 SARPs compliance. The architecture achieves a high performance-to-cost ratio, enabling nationwide SBAS coverage with a 65% cost reduction versus legacy navaids. The system is forward-compatible with dual-frequency multi-constellation SBAS (DFMC), supporting future APV-II scalability. These results position Colombia as a regional node for GNSS augmentation, fostering safety, efficiency, and procedural harmonization. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Astronautics & Space Science)
Show Figures

Figure 1

47 pages, 12445 KB  
Article
Cognitive Radio–Based Ionospheric Scintillation Detection: A Low-Cost Framework for GNSS Detection and Monitoring in Equatorial Regions
by Jaime Orduy Rodríguez, Walter Abrahao Dos Santos, Claudia Nicoli Candido, Danny Stevens Traslaviña, Cristian Lozano Tafur, Pedro Melo Daza and Iván Felipe Rodríguez Barón
Sensors 2026, 26(6), 1765; https://doi.org/10.3390/s26061765 - 11 Mar 2026
Viewed by 358
Abstract
Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) are highly affected in equatorial regions, especially due to the formation of Equatorial Plasma Bubbles (EPBs), which cause disturbances in the ionosphere resulting in different forms of signal degradation. Despite Colombia’s privileged geographic position, its limited monitoring infrastructure [...] Read more.
Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) are highly affected in equatorial regions, especially due to the formation of Equatorial Plasma Bubbles (EPBs), which cause disturbances in the ionosphere resulting in different forms of signal degradation. Despite Colombia’s privileged geographic position, its limited monitoring infrastructure hinders the detection and mitigation of these effects. This study proposes the development of a Low-Cost Scintillation Laboratory (LCSL) using a cognitive radio–based approach for real-time scintillation monitoring, aimed at improving GNSS reliability. The system was designed following a Systems Engineering methodology, defining functional architectures and constraints. A communication system model was developed to account for EPBs’ effects on GNSS signals, while cognitive radio algorithms within a Software-Defined Radio (SDR) framework enabled real-time detection, monitoring, and alert generation. To implement this approach, monitoring stations were deployed in Bogotá, Cartagena, and Santa Marta utilized low-cost GNSS receivers integrated with Machine Learning (ML) algorithms for the automatic classification of scintillation events. Additionally, the system’s accuracy was validated by comparing experimental data with historical records from the Geophysical Institute of Peru (IGP). The results demonstrated that the integration of cognitive radio and ML-based detection enhanced precision and adaptability compared to traditional methods. The network of monitoring stations effectively validated the system’s performance, providing valuable insights into equatorial ionospheric dynamics. This study contributes to the advancement of monitoring methodologies and highlights the importance of accessible infrastructure for mitigating EPB effects on GNSS, ultimately fostering more resilient navigation and communication systems. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Physical Sensors for Environmental Monitoring)
Show Figures

Figure 1

33 pages, 2581 KB  
Review
Regulatory and Spectrum Challenges for Passive Space Weather Monitoring
by Valeria Leite, Tarcisio Bakaus, Mateus Cardoso, Marco Antonio Bockoski de Paula and Alison Moraes
Universe 2026, 12(3), 74; https://doi.org/10.3390/universe12030074 - 5 Mar 2026
Viewed by 213
Abstract
Space weather monitoring depends critically on passive sensor systems that detect and measure natural solar and geospace emissions without transmitting radio frequency energy. These include riometers, solar radio monitors, interplanetary scintillation detectors, GNSS-based ionospheric sensors, and broadband solar spectrographs that enable the provision [...] Read more.
Space weather monitoring depends critically on passive sensor systems that detect and measure natural solar and geospace emissions without transmitting radio frequency energy. These include riometers, solar radio monitors, interplanetary scintillation detectors, GNSS-based ionospheric sensors, and broadband solar spectrographs that enable the provision of critical data required to forecast geomagnetic storms, protect critical infrastructures, and support aviation services, satellite operations, and defense services. However, with the increasing proliferation of radiocommunication technologies such as 5G/6G networks, dense HF/VHF/UHF deployments, and large constellations of low-Earth-orbit (LEO) satellites, the interference threat to these exceptionally sensitive receivers has grown. Most of these operate near the thermal noise floor and thus require strict protection criteria to ensure continuity of data. This review and perspective article provides a cross-disciplinary synthesis of scientific requirements, documented RFI case studies, and ongoing regulatory developments related to spectrum protection for passive space weather sensors. It systematically integrates perspectives on physical, technical, and regulatory aspects that are typically addressed separately in the literature. The article reviews the operating principles of major sensor classes and analyzes documented RFI cases affecting GNSS, riometers, CALLISTO, BINGO, and systems impacted by LEO satellite emissions, drawing from existing reports and regulatory submissions. Building on this evidence base, the work comparatively evaluates regulatory methods under consideration for WRC-27 shows that hybrid approaches combining primary allocations in core observation bands with secondary status and coordination procedures in adjacent bands offer the most viable path forward. This synthesis contextualizes and analyzes how technical protection criteria can be integrated with existing and evolving regulatory instruments to inform spectrum governance. The study concludes that without coordinated international spectrum management incorporating explicit protection thresholds and registration procedures, the long-term viability of space weather monitoring infrastructure faces significant risk in an increasingly congested radio frequency environment. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 4572 KB  
Article
Mitigating Machine-in-the-Loop Drone Attacks on Satellite Links via Atmospheric Scintillation Analysis
by Rajnish Kumar and Shlomi Arnon
Electronics 2026, 15(5), 1076; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics15051076 - 4 Mar 2026
Viewed by 285
Abstract
The emergence of quantum computing poses a significant threat to the security of traditional encryption methods employed in satellite communication. To mitigate this vulnerability and enhance cybersecurity in the next generation of communication systems, a novel physical-layer solution is presented. This approach centers [...] Read more.
The emergence of quantum computing poses a significant threat to the security of traditional encryption methods employed in satellite communication. To mitigate this vulnerability and enhance cybersecurity in the next generation of communication systems, a novel physical-layer solution is presented. This approach centers on enhancing satellite link security through the analysis of stochastic atmospheric scintillation, facilitated by machine learning (ML). The proposed method safeguards ground stations against Machine-in-the-Middle (MITM) attacks perpetrated from aerial platforms (AP) such as drones or Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs). The underlying principle leverages the distinct statistical parameters inherent to received signals. These parameters are contingent upon the specific propagation channel, which is influenced by rapid tropospheric scintillation. As signals from legitimate satellites and malicious drones traverse separate spatial paths within the dynamic atmosphere, they exhibit demonstrably divergent scintillation statistics. Wavelet filtering is employed to extract these statistics from the incoming signal. The extracted data is subsequently processed through an ML algorithm, enabling the differentiation between satellite signals and potential spoofing signals emanating from drones. Extensive simulations have been conducted, illustrating the efficacy and robustness of the proposed architecture, consistently achieving an authentication rate exceeding 98% across diverse scenarios. Additionally, experimental results obtained from measurement data collected from Nilesat and Eutelsat satellites at a ground station in Israel provide empirical validation for this innovative approach. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 3021 KB  
Article
Development and Validation of a Digitizer-Based TCSPC System for Scintillation Decay Time Analysis via an Extended Convolution Model
by Qianqian Zhou, Zhijie Yang, Wenhui Li, Juncheng Liang and Wuyun Xiao
Sensors 2026, 26(5), 1488; https://doi.org/10.3390/s26051488 - 27 Feb 2026
Viewed by 218
Abstract
The development of high-fidelity digital twins for scintillation spectrometer detectors demands precise experimental characterization of timing parameters. This work presents a comprehensive solution comprising a digitizer-based time-correlated single-photon counting (TCSPC) system and an extended convolution model for decay time analysis. We introduce a [...] Read more.
The development of high-fidelity digital twins for scintillation spectrometer detectors demands precise experimental characterization of timing parameters. This work presents a comprehensive solution comprising a digitizer-based time-correlated single-photon counting (TCSPC) system and an extended convolution model for decay time analysis. We introduce a physics-driven calibration principle, validating the system response against an independent physical benchmark to ensure fidelity. The proposed convolution model advances beyond the conventional model by incorporating additional parameters to account for scintillator-induced timing broadening and delay, thereby decoupling this effect from instrumental response. The model’s descriptive power was statistically validated through its application to fast scintillators, while its physical accuracy was robustly confirmed through the precise extraction of typical decay times from slow scintillators. This methodology establishes a reliable workflow from measurement to parameterization, directly supplying the decoupled inputs required for the digital twins of scintillation detectors. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Optical Sensors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 2934 KB  
Article
High-Resolution X-Ray Imaging Using Cs3Cu2Br1.25I3.75 Scintillator Arrays Grown by In Situ Solution Processing
by Xinlin Li, Zhenxin Yan, Baoyu Zhou, Junhua Hu, Ziyu Zhao and Tao Lin
Crystals 2026, 16(2), 122; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst16020122 - 7 Feb 2026
Viewed by 356
Abstract
Low-dimensional lead-free metal halide perovskites have demonstrated excellent performance in indirect X-ray detectors; however, the imaging resolution remains limited due to the lack of effective scintillation waveguiding. In this work, array-structured scintillation screens were fabricated using anodic aluminum oxide (AAO) templates via a [...] Read more.
Low-dimensional lead-free metal halide perovskites have demonstrated excellent performance in indirect X-ray detectors; however, the imaging resolution remains limited due to the lack of effective scintillation waveguiding. In this work, array-structured scintillation screens were fabricated using anodic aluminum oxide (AAO) templates via a spatial confinement–assisted in situ growth strategy. The resulting directional optical confinement effect significantly enhances the scintillation performance of the screen. The fabricated Cs3Cu2Br1.25I3.75-AAO scintillator arrays achieve a spatial resolution of 14.10 lp/mm and a minimum detectable dose rate of 243 nGy/s under X-ray irradiation. In addition, the scintillator arrays exhibit excellent radiation stability, providing a reliable and cost-effective solution for high-resolution array-based X-ray imaging. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Scintillators: Luminescence Properties and Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 2396 KB  
Article
Three-Dimensional Visualization of the Scattered Radiation Sources and Evaluation of Radiation Protection Measures in Cardiac Angiography
by Natsumi Kamochi, Toshioh Fujibuchi, Donghee Han and Hitoshi Miyazaki
Appl. Sci. 2026, 16(3), 1405; https://doi.org/10.3390/app16031405 - 29 Jan 2026
Viewed by 407
Abstract
Physicians performing cardiac angiography are exposed to scattered radiation originating from the patient, and visualizing scattered radiation sources could help optimize radiation protection strategies. In this study, an existing scattered radiation source visualization system comprising a high-sensitivity CMOS camera, thallium-activated cesium iodide scintillator, [...] Read more.
Physicians performing cardiac angiography are exposed to scattered radiation originating from the patient, and visualizing scattered radiation sources could help optimize radiation protection strategies. In this study, an existing scattered radiation source visualization system comprising a high-sensitivity CMOS camera, thallium-activated cesium iodide scintillator, and pinhole collimator was extended to incorporate a depth camera and employed to visualize scattered radiation sources in three dimensions under conditions simulating clinical cardiac angiography. Scattered radiation source images were captured using a patient phantom under multiple irradiation directions of a biplane angiography system, and changes in the images and dose rate reaching the system were evaluated with and without radiation protection equipment and for various ceiling-mounted radiation shielding positions. The scattered radiation source was visualized on the patient phantom surface for a 5-s exposure in three-dimensional images and was observed around the X-ray tube in one direction. Radiation protection equipment reduced both the scattered radiation source intensity and dose rate. The greatest reduction occurred when the ceiling-mounted radiation shielding was positioned near the physician. Irradiation at caudal angles caused the highest increase in scattered radiation source intensity and dose rate. These findings suggest that this system can support the optimization of radiation protection practices and education. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Environmental Monitoring and Radiation Protection)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop