Search Results (60)

Background/Objectives: Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) carries a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Sacituzumab govitecan (SG), an anti-Trop-2 antibody–drug conjugate, has shown activity in this setting, but a quantitative synthesis integrating randomized and real-world evidence—particularly in underrepresented subgroups—was lacking. We aimed to summarize the comparative benefit of SG, which derives from a single randomized trial, and to assess whether trial-level efficacy is consistent with the activity observed in routine practice. Methods: Following PRISMA 2020, we searched PubMed/MEDLINE and Web of Science (January 2017–April 2026) for trials and observational cohorts of SG monotherapy in mTNBC. Comparative effects were taken from randomized data; single-arm efficacy (objective response rate [ORR], clinical benefit rate [CBR], median progression-free [PFS], and overall survival [OS]) was pooled using random-effects models. Risk of bias was assessed with RoB 2 and ROBINS-I. The review was registered in the Open Science Framework. Results: Nine studies (1242 patients; 980 SG-treated) were included: one randomized trial (ASCENT), two single-arm trials, and six real-world cohorts. In ASCENT, SG improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.41, 95% CI 0.33–0.63) and OS (HR 0.51, 0.42–0.64). Pooled ORR was 31.1% (28.0–34.4), and CBR was 42.2% (37.7–46.8), with the median PFS being 4.8 months (4.4–5.3) and OS being 11.0 months (9.3–13.0); trial-derived and real-world estimates were concordant. The benefit persisted in older patients (HR 0.25) and Black women (HR 0.44) but not in those with brain metastases (HR 0.68, 0.38–1.23). Conclusions: SG shows clinically meaningful activity in mTNBC that is broadly consistent between controlled trials and routine practice. Comparative superiority over chemotherapy rests on a single randomized trial (ASCENT); the pooled single-arm estimates describe activity and its consistency rather than a comparative effect. Full article

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have transitioned from clinically marginal agents into a defining therapeutic class for solid tumor oncology. In DESTINY-Breast03, trastuzumab deruxtecan achieved a four-fold progression-free survival advantage over trastuzumab emtansine, attributable not to antibody engineering but to the linker-payload axis: a cleavable peptide linker and a topoisomerase I payload with bystander activity. Sacituzumab govitecan extends the same logic to Trop-2-positive disease via extracellular payload release, and the framework now spans breast, urothelial, gynecologic, lung, gastric, and colorectal cancers, with enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab displacing platinum chemotherapy as first-line therapy for urothelial cancer in EV-302 (median overall survival 31.5 versus 16.1 months). This review synthesizes ADC biology along three analytical axes. The mechanistic axis links each linker-payload-DAR configuration to a specific tumor-biology barrier: vascular limitation, which delivers approximately 0.1% of the administered dose to tumor tissue; the binding-site barrier, which concentrates exposure at the perivascular margin; and antigen mosaicism, which defeats internalization-dependent killing. The translational axis examines resistance as a coordinated failure across antigen modulation, trafficking, efflux, apoptotic execution, and lysosomal processing. The clinical axis traces the platform’s migration toward earlier-line and curative-intent settings. We close by examining whether the ADC delivery architecture translates to precision immunosuppression in autoimmune disease, where the glucocorticoid receptor modulator ADC ABBV-154 met placebo-controlled efficacy endpoints in rheumatoid arthritis but was discontinued because its benefit-risk profile did not differentiate it from existing biologic therapies. Full article

Background/Objectives: Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) releases SN-38, the same active metabolite as irinotecan, thereby sharing key metabolic pathways and toxicity mechanisms. The clearance of SN-38 is strongly influenced by UGT1A1 polymorphisms, particularly the UGT1A1*28 allele. While UGT1A1*28 genotyping routinely guides irinotecan dosing, no such recommendations exist for SG. This study describes the relationship between UGT1A1*28 and severe SG-related toxicity in real-world practice, identifying early safety signals and exploring the clinical and economic impact. Methods: This retrospective observational study (2021–2025) included patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with SG and patients with advanced gastrointestinal malignancies treated with irinotecan at a tertiary hospital. In the SG cohort, genotyping followed grade ≥3 toxicity; in the irinotecan cohort, it was performed prospectively. Toxicity (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0) and healthcare costs related to hospitalizations were estimated using official institutional tariffs. Results: All nine SG patients with severe toxicity (100%) carried the UGT1A1*28 allele. In the irinotecan cohort (n = 74), which was managed with genotype-guided dosing, severe toxicity and hospitalization were less frequent. SG was associated with higher mean costs per treated patient (€2817.01 vs. €1233.63), driven by toxicity-related admissions (33.3% vs. 10.8%). Genotyping costs (€10.51) were negligible compared to daily hospitalization expenses (up to €1984.90). Conclusions: Severe SG-related toxicity reveals a consistent UGT1A1*28-associated vulnerability. Given the drug’s recent approval in Spain, these data represent an urgent real-world safety signal. The marked disparity between low genotyping costs and high hospitalization expenses supports implementing preventive UGT1A1 testing to optimize the safety and sustainability of sacituzumab govitecan therapy. Full article

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common malignant disease in women in Romania, with incidence and mortality rates among the highest in Europe. This consensus statement aims to ensure equitable access to care for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic BC (HR+/HER2– mBC) and triple-negative mBC (mTNBC) in Romania. Between December 2024 and June 2025, a scientific board of 11 oncologists, in collaboration with the Romanian National Society for Medical Oncology (SNOMR), developed national recommendations based on ESMO/NCCN/ABC guidelines, clinical expertise, and local conditions. A modified Delphi survey was conducted among medical oncologists to evaluate acceptance of recommendations with greatest clinical impact. Key recommendations included: mandatory biopsy at metastasis with ER/PgR/HER2 retesting, HER2-low assessment, and molecular profiling (BRCA, PIK3CA, AKT1/PTEN, ESR1, plus PD-L1 testing in mTNBC); for HR+/HER2– mBC, first-line endocrine therapy plus CDK4/6 inhibitor, followed by targeted agents, chemotherapy, or antibody–drug conjugates based on progression and visceral crisis; for mTNBC, first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor plus chemotherapy in PD-L1-positive, PARP inhibitors in BRCA-positive patients, and sacituzumab-govitecan or trastuzumab-deruxtecan later; systematic toxicity monitoring; and integrated supportive and palliative care. Sixty-one oncologists completed the survey, with >90% overall agreement, suggesting broad acceptance of recommendations as Romania’s national standard for mBC care. Full article

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) have reshaped the treatment landscape of urothelial carcinoma (UC) by enabling selective delivery of highly potent cytotoxic agents to tumor cells. Enfortumab vedotin, sacituzumab govitecan, and HER2-directed ADCs have demonstrated meaningful clinical activity across metastatic and earlier disease settings, with enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab now established as a first-line standard of care. Despite these advances, therapeutic responses remain heterogeneous, and resistance frequently limits durability. This review summarizes current knowledge on predictors of response and mechanisms of resistance to ADCs in UC, highlighting the roles of target antigen expression and heterogeneity, genomic alterations, payload sensitivity, drug efflux transporters, and tumor microenvironmental factors. We discuss emerging biomarkers beyond antigen abundance, patterns of cross-resistance and treatment sequencing, and evolving strategies to overcome resistance, including next-generation ADC design and rational combination therapies. Advancing biomarker-driven patient selection and addressing mechanisms of resistance will be critical to maximizing the durability and clinical impact of ADCs in urothelial carcinoma. Full article

Background: The UGT1A1 gene is associated with the toxicity caused by SN38, the cytotoxic component of Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) used in the treatment of metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC), among other approved indications. In this study, we aimed to analyze the effect of UGT1A1*28 allele on the safety and, secondarily, the effectiveness of SG in mTNBC. Methods: This was a multicenter, ambispective study that included patients treated with SG for mTNBC. Genotyping for UGT1A1*28 was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Adverse events (AEs) of grade ≥ 2 during the first three cycles were compared between patients who were homozygous mutant (UGT1A1*28/*28) and those with wild-type (WT) or heterozygous genotypes. Effectiveness between the two groups was also compared using progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) assessed with the Kaplan–Meier method. Results: A total of 81 patients were included: 37.0% were WT, 55.6% heterozygous, and 7.4% homozygous mutant. All UGT1A1 *28/*28 patients experienced grade ≥ 2 AEs (100% vs. 69.3%; p = 0.109), with a statistically significant association in the case of febrile neutropenia (33.3% vs. 6.7%; p = 0.025), and a trend towards higher rates of anemia and diarrhea (50.0% vs. 17.3%; p = 0.053). Genotype did not influence PFS or OS; however, dose reductions were associated with better survival outcomes. Conclusions: This real-world study shows a correlation between toxicity and the presence of the UGT1A1*28 mutation in patients treated with SG for mTNBC. Improving treatment tolerability through dose reductions may enhance SG effectiveness. These findings support the implementation of UGT1A1 genotyping in routine clinical practice. Full article

Breast cancer remains the most common malignancy and one of the leading causes of cancer-related death among women worldwide. Advances in antibody-based therapies have improved outcomes across all biological subtypes: HER2-positive, triple-negative, and luminal breast cancer. Monoclonal antibodies such as trastuzumab and pertuzumab have established HER2-targeted therapy as a standard of care, while immune checkpoint inhibitors have introduced immunotherapy into the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer. The emergence of antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs), including trastuzumab deruxtecan, sacituzumab govitecan, and datopotamab deruxtecan, has further expanded the available therapeutic options. Bispecific antibodies represent a new generation of agents with the potential to overcome resistance and enhance immune activation. Despite impressive progress, important challenges remain, including resistance mechanisms and the management of treatment-related toxicities. This review summarizes the biological rationale, clinical evidence, resistance mechanisms, and safety profiles of therapies based on monoclonal antibodies, bispecific antibodies, and antibody–drug conjugates in breast cancer. The development of these treatment modalities fosters the implementation of personalized, immunologically informed treatment strategies that are redefining precision oncology in breast cancer. Full article

Breast cancer is the most common cancer and the most important cause of cancer-related death in females worldwide. Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) represent a novel class of targeted therapies that combine the precision of monoclonal antibodies with the potent cell-killing activity of cytotoxic drugs. This review highlights recent mechanistic, technological, and clinical developments of ADCs in breast cancer, including next-generation ADCs beyond those that target HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2). Authors performed a systematic literature study for ADCs and their structural features, including their components (antibody, linker, and payload) and their therapeutic efficacy. A frame of preclinical research findings and clinical evidence integration of HER2-targeted therapy outcomes in HER2-positive, HER2-low, and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtypes were presented. Clinical studies of antibody–drug conjugates such as trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), and sacituzumab govitecan have demonstrated significant improvements in progression-free survival and overall survival across diverse breast cancer patient populations. ADCs offer unique advantages in breast cancer therapy by combining the precision of targeted antibodies with the potency of chemotherapy drugs. This allows them to selectively kill cancer cells, overcome resistance, reduce toxicity to healthy tissues, and expand treatment options for difficult subtypes like HER2-low and triple-negative breast cancer. Unlike previous reviews focusing on HER2-targeted ADCs, herein we review exciting ADCs targeting HER3 HER3 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 3) and Nectin-4, as well as the implications of bispecific and immune-stimulatory ADCs in the clinic. Additionally, it features mechanism-based innovations and novel trial data that revolutionize ADC applications in the HER2-low as well as the triple-negative breast cancer subtypes. The advent of ADC is changing precision oncology in breast cancer. With a new design and indications evolving, they are an attractive avenue for bypassing resistance and reducing toxicity and ultimately improving patient outcomes in the molecular subtypes. The present review summarizes recent advancements in antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) and emerging targeted therapeutic strategies for breast cancer. It covers mechanistic insights, linker–payload innovations, receptor-based targeting approaches, clinical trial progress, and next-generation modalities that extend beyond HER2-directed ADCs. Current challenges, safety profiles, and future opportunities in engineering more selective and effective ADC platforms are also discussed. Full article

Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive breast cancer subtype characterized by poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options. Chemotherapy regimens are associated with significant adverse effects negatively impacting patients’ quality of life (QoL). This systematic review aims to evaluate and compare QoL outcomes of patients with TNBC receiving novel therapies—including immunotherapy, antibody–drug conjugates, and targeted therapies—versus standard chemotherapy. Methods: We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published within the past 15 years, identified through comprehensive searches in PubMed, Google Scholar, Research4Life, and Elicit. Included studies involved FDA-approved novel therapies (pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, sacituzumab-govitecan, olaparib, and talazoparib) administered to TNBC patients, and assessed QoL using validated tools such as EORTC QLQ-C30. Observational studies, case reports, and non-standardized assessments were excluded. Results: Eight RCTs comprising 3929 patients met the inclusion criteria. Sacituzumab govitecan and PARP inhibitors (olaparib and talazoparib) significantly improved QoL, notably delaying deterioration across physical, emotional, and functional domains compared to standard chemotherapy. Conversely, immunotherapies (pembrolizumab, atezolizumab) showed non-significant trends toward QoL improvement, with effects varying by patient subgroup and disease stage. Interpretation was limited by study design differences, inconsistent compliance, and incomplete data reporting. Conclusions: Immunotherapy showed a neutral effect on quality of life, providing neither significant improvement nor additional decline. Olaparib was associated with a delayed deterioration in quality of life, showing a more favorable tolerability profile compared to chemotherapy. Talazoparib leads to clinically meaningful enhancements in quality of life, while sacituzumab govitecan effectively improves patient-reported outcomes relative to standard chemotherapy. Full article

Objective: This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of sacituzumab govitecan (SG) compared with single-agent chemotherapy of the physician’s choice (TPC) from the perspective of Taiwan’s National Health Insurance. Methods: A partitioned survival model was developed to assess outcomes in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). Clinical data were derived from the ASCENT trial, while direct medical costs were obtained from Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Administration (NHIA). Utility values were taken from published literature. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), expressed as cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to examine parameter uncertainty and test the robustness of the results. Results: In the base-case analysis, SG was associated with an incremental cost of USD 121,836 per QALY gained—exceeding Taiwan’s willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of USD 102,120. One-way sensitivity analyses indicated that SG drug cost was the primary driver of ICER variability. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that reducing the price of SG by 50% increased the likelihood of cost-effectiveness. Conclusions: From the NHIA perspective, SG is not cost-effective for patients with advanced or metastatic TNBC at its current price. Substantial price reductions would be required for SG to become cost-effective under the WTP threshold of USD 102,120 per QALY. Full article

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) have revolutionized breast cancer (BC) therapy by combining targeted antibody specificity with potent cytotoxic payloads, thereby enhancing efficacy while minimizing systemic toxicity. This review highlights significant innovations driving ADC development alongside persistent challenges. Recent advancements include novel antibody–drug conjugate (ADC) designs targeting diverse antigens, such as HER2, HER3, and CD276, demonstrating potent anti-tumor activity and improved strategies for drug delivery. For instance, dual-payload ADCs and those leveraging extracellular vesicles offer new dimensions in precision oncology. The integration of ADCs into sequential therapy, such as sacituzumab govitecan with TOP1/PARP inhibitors, further underscores their synergistic potential. Despite these innovations, critical challenges remain, including tumor heterogeneity and acquired drug resistance, which often involve complex molecular alterations. Moreover, optimizing ADC components, including linker chemistry and payload characteristics, is essential for ensuring stability and minimizing off-target toxicity. The burgeoning role of artificial intelligence and machine learning is pivotal in accelerating the design of ADCs, target identification, and personalized patient stratification. This review aims to comprehensively explore the cutting-edge innovations and inherent challenges in ADC development for BC, providing a holistic perspective on their current impact and future trajectory. Full article

Background/Objectives: Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is an antibody–drug conjugate targeting Trop-2 that has demonstrated clinical benefits in randomised trials for patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) and metastatic hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative (HR+/HER2− mBC) disease. However, real-world data on its effectiveness and safety are limited, especially in patients with poor performance status or central nervous system (CNS) involvement. This study aimed to evaluate the real-world outcomes of SG in these two subtypes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, multicentre, observational study across three tertiary hospitals in Spain. Patients with mTNBC or HR+/HER2− mBC treated with SG between June 2022 and March 2025 were included. Clinical data, treatment history, adverse events (AEs), and survival outcomes were also recorded. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) were estimated using Kaplan–Meier analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the factors influencing outcomes. The association between granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) prophylaxis and neutropenia was assessed using Fisher’s exact test. Results: A total of 56 patients were included in this study (33 with mTNBC and 23 with HR+/HER2− mBC). In the mTNBC group, mPFS was 4.0 months (95% CI: 1.94–5.98) and mOS was 11.0 months (95% CI: 4.80–17.12). In the HR+/HER2− mBC group, mPFS was 3.7 months (95% CI: 2.02–5.44) and mOS was 20.2 months (95% CI: 3.9–36.5). Fatigue, neutropenia, and gastrointestinal toxicity were the most common AEs. Primary G-CSF prophylaxis was not associated with a reduced incidence of neutropenia (p = 0.434). Conclusions: In routine practice, SG shows effectiveness comparable to that of randomised trials across both subtypes, with a safety profile consistent with pivotal studies. The observed toxicity profile was consistent with that described in pivotal clinical trials and other studies. The prophylactic use of G-CSF was not associated with an impact on the occurrence of neutropenia, but the incidence of neutropenia was lower than that in clinical trials and other studies that did not administer G-CSF prophylactically. Full article

Background: The treatment options for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer include targeted therapies, cytotoxic chemotherapies, and immunotherapy. However, limited specificity and inevitable resistance highlight the need for novel agents. Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs), such as trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) and sacituzumab govitecan (SG), represent a breakthrough by selectively delivering cytotoxic agents to tumor cells, potentially improving the therapeutic index. Despite demonstrated efficacy, ADCs present toxicity profiles similar to conventional chemotherapy, alongside unique adverse events. In clinical practice, oncologists may face scenarios where both T-DXd and SG are treatment options in HER2-negative mBC. To enable shared decision-making, it is crucial to present a comprehensive overview that includes both efficacy data and detailed toxicity profiles. Our objective was to provide a pooled and informative synthesis of toxicities from pivotal studies, including graphical representations, to support informed, patient-centered medical decisions. Methods: We reviewed safety data from phase 3 clinical trials in HER2-negative mBC: DESTINY-Breast04/DESTINY-Breast06 for T-DXd and ASCENT/TROPICS-02 for SG. Adverse event (AE) profiles, including frequency and severity, were extracted, and weighted means were calculated. Emerging ADCs such as datopotamab deruxtecan and patritumab deruxtecan were considered to contextualize future therapeutic decisions. Results: Tables, bar plots and radar plots were generated. T-DXd demonstrated high rates of nausea (69.2%), fatigue (47.2%), and neutropenia (35.6%), with 52.7% experiencing grade ≥ 3 AEs. Notably, pneumonitis occurred in 10.7%, with grade ≥ 3 in 2.6%. SG showed a distinct AE profile, with higher incidences of neutropenia (67.1%), with grade ≥ 3 in 51.3%, and diarrhea (60.8%). Conclusions: The choice between ADCs in HER2-negative metastatic BC when both T-DXd and SG are treatment options should consider toxicity profiles to optimize patient-centered treatment strategies. Tailoring ADC selection based on individual tolerance and preferences is critical for shared decision-making, and future research should focus on assessing the utility and acceptability of such clinical tools to guide treatment selection. Full article

Background: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains a highly aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis. Despite multimodal standard therapies, most patients relapse within months, and second-line treatment options such as topotecan offer only limited benefit. Novel therapeutic strategies are therefore urgently needed. Methods: This narrative review is based on a selective literature search conducted via PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov (last updated June 2025). Results: Emerging treatment strategies include bispecific T-cell engagers (e.g., tarlatamab), antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) such as sacituzumab govitecan, DS-7300, and ZL-1310, as well as targeted therapies. Among these, tarlatamab has demonstrated improved survival outcomes with an acceptable safety profile and is poised to become the new second-line standard. In contrast, ADCs and targeted agents have shown only modest efficacy and have yet to deliver meaningful survival benefits, often accompanied by increased toxicity. Additionally, the identification of molecular subtypes of SCLC has revealed subtype-specific differences in treatment response. However, clinical translation is challenged by intratumoral heterogeneity, plasticity, and the lack of standardized diagnostic assays. Conclusions: While tarlatamab represents a major therapeutic advancement, other agents remain in early clinical development and require validation in large, randomized trials. The clinical implementation of molecular subtyping remains limited, though it holds promise for future personalized treatment approaches. Despite recent progress, SCLC continues to pose substantial therapeutic challenges, emphasizing the need for improved treatment strategies and validated predictive biomarkers. Full article

Background: The patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of sacituzumab govitecan (SG) were compared with chemotherapy using two phase 3 trials (TROPiCS-02, EVER-132-002) involving patients with HR+/HER2− locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic breast cancer. Methods: A meta-analysis was performed to compare change from baseline (CFB) scores and time-to-deterioration (TTD) between SG and chemotherapy using EORTC QLQ-C30 and EQ-5D-5L VAS in the overall, prior CDK4/6i-treated, and fast-progressor populations. Results of CFB and TTD analyses were summarized using hazard ratio (HR) and mean difference measures. Results: Statistically significant improvement (p < 0.05) in CFB scores was observed with SG over chemotherapy in five EORTC QLQ-C30 domains: physical (mean difference: 2.64), role functioning (mean difference: 2.70), fatigue (mean difference: −2.51), pain (mean difference: −3.25) and dyspnea (mean difference: −3.27), and EQ-5D-5L VAS (mean difference: 1.58). In the overall population, longer TTD (p < 0.05) was observed with SG versus chemotherapy on six domains of EORTC QLQ-C30: GHS/QoL (HR: 0.76), physical (HR: 0.72), emotional functioning (HR: 0.73), fatigue (HR: 0.80), pain (HR: 0.82), and dyspnea (HR: 0.71). Results from EORTC QLQ-C30 domains were mostly consistent among the overall, prior CDK4/6i treated and fast-progressor populations. SG demonstrated longer TTD (p < 0.05) over chemotherapy for EQ-5D-5L-VAS across all studied populations (HR range: 0.63–0.69). PROs significantly worsened with SG in the domains of diarrhea and nausea and vomiting (commonly reported adverse events of SG, manageable by following established guidelines). Conclusions: SG significantly improved PROs versus chemotherapy for several subdomains of EORTC QLQ-C30 and EQ-5D-5L-VAS. The consistency of these results in the overall population and subgroups supports the generalizability of the meta-analytic evidence and reinforces the PRO benefits associated with SG versus chemotherapy. Full article