You are currently on the new version of our website. Access the old version .
  • This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
  • Article
  • Open Access

10 January 2026

Impact of UGT1A1*28 Allele on the Safety and Effectiveness of Sacituzumab Govitecan in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Real-World Evidence

,
,
,
,
,
and
on behalf of the Estudio Mama-SSG Working Group
1
Pharmacy Department, Son Espases University Hospital, Cra. de Valldemossa, 79, 07120 Palma, Spain
2
eHealth and Telemedicine Research Group, Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (IdISBa), Cra. Valldemossa, 07120 Palma, Spain
3
Unidad de Investigación, Servicio de Farmacia Hospitalaria, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Canarias, 38320 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
4
Pharmacy Department, Consorci Hospitalari de Vic, 08500 Barcelona, Spain
J. Clin. Med.2026, 15(2), 574;https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15020574 
(registering DOI)
This article belongs to the Special Issue Breast Cancer: Clinical Diagnosis and Personalized Therapy

Abstract

Background: The UGT1A1 gene is associated with the toxicity caused by SN38, the cytotoxic component of Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) used in the treatment of metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC), among other approved indications. In this study, we aimed to analyze the effect of UGT1A1*28 allele on the safety and, secondarily, the effectiveness of SG in mTNBC. Methods: This was a multicenter, ambispective study that included patients treated with SG for mTNBC. Genotyping for UGT1A1*28 was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Adverse events (AEs) of grade ≥ 2 during the first three cycles were compared between patients who were homozygous mutant (UGT1A1*28/*28) and those with wild-type (WT) or heterozygous genotypes. Effectiveness between the two groups was also compared using progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) assessed with the Kaplan–Meier method. Results: A total of 81 patients were included: 37.0% were WT, 55.6% heterozygous, and 7.4% homozygous mutant. All UGT1A1 *28/*28 patients experienced grade ≥ 2 AEs (100% vs. 69.3%; p = 0.109), with a statistically significant association in the case of febrile neutropenia (33.3% vs. 6.7%; p = 0.025), and a trend towards higher rates of anemia and diarrhea (50.0% vs. 17.3%; p = 0.053). Genotype did not influence PFS or OS; however, dose reductions were associated with better survival outcomes. Conclusions: This real-world study shows a correlation between toxicity and the presence of the UGT1A1*28 mutation in patients treated with SG for mTNBC. Improving treatment tolerability through dose reductions may enhance SG effectiveness. These findings support the implementation of UGT1A1 genotyping in routine clinical practice.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.