Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (7,239)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = radiotherapies

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
15 pages, 614 KiB  
Article
Multi-Institutional Comparison of Ablative 5-Fraction Magnetic Resonance-Guided Online Adaptive Versus 15/25-Fraction Computed Tomography-Guided Moderately Hypofractionated Offline Adapted Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
by Michael D. Chuong, Eileen M. O’Reilly, Robert A. Herrera, Melissa Zinovoy, Kathryn E. Mittauer, Muni Rubens, Adeel Kaiser, Paul B. Romesser, Nema Bassiri-Gharb, Abraham J. Wu, John J. Cuaron, Alonso N. Gutierrez, Carla Hajj, Antonio Ucar, Fernando DeZarraga, Santiago Aparo, Christopher H. Crane and Marsha Reyngold
Cancers 2025, 17(15), 2596; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17152596 - 7 Aug 2025
Abstract
Background: Radiation dose escalation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) using stereotactic magnetic resonance (MR)-guided online adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) or computed tomography (CT)-guided moderately hypofractionated ablative radiation therapy (HART) can achieve favorable outcomes although have not previously been compared. Methods: We performed [...] Read more.
Background: Radiation dose escalation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) using stereotactic magnetic resonance (MR)-guided online adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) or computed tomography (CT)-guided moderately hypofractionated ablative radiation therapy (HART) can achieve favorable outcomes although have not previously been compared. Methods: We performed a multi-center retrospective analysis of SMART (50 Gy/5 fractions) vs. HART (75 Gy/25 fractions or 67.5 Gy/15 fractions with concurrent capecitabine) for LAPC. Gray’s test and Cox proportional regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with local failure (LF) and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 211 patients (SMART, n = 91; HART, n = 120) were evaluated, and none had surgery. Median follow-up after SMART and HART was 27.0 and 40.0 months, respectively (p < 0.0002). SMART achieved higher gross tumor volume (GTV) coverage and greater hotspots. Two-year LF after SMART and HART was 6.5% and 32.9% (p < 0.001), while two-year OS was 31.0% vs. 35.3% (p = 0.056), respectively. LF was associated with SMART vs. HART (HR 5.389, 95% CI: 1.298–21.975; p = 0.021) and induction mFOLFIRINOX vs. non-mFOLFIRINOX (HR 2.067, 95% CI 1.038–4.052; p = 0.047), while OS was associated with CA19-9 decrease > 40% (HR 0.725, 95% CI 0.515–0.996; p = 0.046) and GTV V120% (HR 1.022, 95% CI 1.006–1.037; p = 0.015). Acute grade > 3 toxicity was similar (3.3% vs. 5.8%; p = 0.390), while late grade > 3 toxicity was less common after SMART (2.2% vs. 9.2%; p = 0.037). Conclusions: Ablative SMART and HART both achieve favorable oncologic outcomes for LAPC with minimal toxicity. We did not observe an OS difference, although technical advantages of SMART might improve target coverage and reduce LF. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

28 pages, 3469 KiB  
Review
Prostate Cancer Treatments and Their Effects on Male Fertility: Mechanisms and Mitigation Strategies
by Aris Kaltsas, Nikolaos Razos, Zisis Kratiras, Dimitrios Deligiannis, Marios Stavropoulos, Konstantinos Adamos, Athanasios Zachariou, Fotios Dimitriadis, Nikolaos Sofikitis and Michael Chrisofos
J. Pers. Med. 2025, 15(8), 360; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15080360 - 7 Aug 2025
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most frequently diagnosed malignancy in men worldwide. Although traditionally considered a disease of older men, the incidence of early-onset PCa (diagnosis < 55 years) is steadily rising. Advances in screening and therapy have significantly improved survival, creating [...] Read more.
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most frequently diagnosed malignancy in men worldwide. Although traditionally considered a disease of older men, the incidence of early-onset PCa (diagnosis < 55 years) is steadily rising. Advances in screening and therapy have significantly improved survival, creating a growing cohort of younger survivors for whom post-treatment quality of life—notably reproductive function—is paramount. Curative treatments such as radical prostatectomy, pelvic radiotherapy, androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT), and chemotherapy often cause irreversible infertility via multiple mechanisms, including surgical disruption of the ejaculatory tract, endocrine suppression of spermatogenesis, direct gonadotoxic injury to the testes, and oxidative sperm DNA damage. Despite these risks, fertility preservation is frequently overlooked in pre-treatment counseling, leaving many patients unaware of their options. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on how PCa therapies impact male fertility, elucidates the molecular and physiological mechanisms of iatrogenic infertility, and evaluates both established and emerging strategies for fertility preservation and restoration. Key interventions covered include sperm cryopreservation, microsurgical testicular sperm extraction (TESE), and assisted reproductive technologies (ART). Psychosocial factors influencing decision-making, novel biomarkers predictive of post-treatment spermatogenic recovery, and long-term offspring outcomes are also examined. The review underscores the urgent need for timely, multidisciplinary fertility consultation as a routine component of PCa care. As PCa increasingly affects men in their reproductive years, proactively integrating preservation into standard oncologic practice should become a standard survivorship priority. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Advances in Male Genitourinary and Sexual Health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

28 pages, 1748 KiB  
Review
Neutrophil Dynamics in Response to Cancer Therapies
by Huazhen Xu, Xiaojun Chen, Yuqing Lu, Nihao Sun, Karis E. Weisgerber, Manzhu Xu and Ren-Yuan Bai
Cancers 2025, 17(15), 2593; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17152593 - 7 Aug 2025
Abstract
Neutrophils are increasingly recognized as key players in the tumor microenvironment (TME), displaying functional plasticity that enables them to either promote or inhibit cancer progression. Depending on environmental cues, tumor-associated neutrophils (TANs) may polarize toward antitumor “N1” or protumor “N2” phenotypes, exerting diverse [...] Read more.
Neutrophils are increasingly recognized as key players in the tumor microenvironment (TME), displaying functional plasticity that enables them to either promote or inhibit cancer progression. Depending on environmental cues, tumor-associated neutrophils (TANs) may polarize toward antitumor “N1” or protumor “N2” phenotypes, exerting diverse effects on tumor growth, metastasis, immune modulation, and treatment response. While previous studies have focused on the pathological roles of TANs in cancer, less attention has been given to how cancer therapies themselves influence the behavior of TANs. This review provides a comprehensive synthesis of current knowledge regarding the dynamics of TANs in response to major cancer treatment modalities, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, cell-based immunotherapies, and oncolytic viral and bacterial therapies. We discuss how these therapies influence TAN recruitment, polarization, and effector functions within the TME, and highlight key molecular regulators involved. By consolidating mechanistic and translational insights, this review emphasizes the potential to therapeutically reprogram TANs to enhance treatment efficacy. A deeper understanding of context-dependent TAN roles will be essential for developing more effective, neutrophil-informed cancer therapies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Role of Neutrophils in Tumor Progression and Metastasis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 340 KiB  
Article
FLOT Versus CROSS—What Is the Optimal Therapeutic Approach for Locally Advanced Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus and the Esophagogastric Junction?
by Martin Leu, Hannes Mahler, Johanna Reinecke, Ute Margarethe König, Leif Hendrik Dröge, Manuel Guhlich, Benjamin Steuber, Marian Grade, Michael Ghadimi, Volker Ellenrieder, Stefan Rieken and Alexander Otto König
Cancers 2025, 17(15), 2587; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17152587 - 6 Aug 2025
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and perioperative chemotherapy are both well-established treatment strategies for locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagus (EAC) and the esophagogastric junction (AEGJ). However, recent knowledge controversially discusses whether neoadjuvant radiotherapy or perioperative chemotherapy represents superior therapeutic options to prolong survival or [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and perioperative chemotherapy are both well-established treatment strategies for locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagus (EAC) and the esophagogastric junction (AEGJ). However, recent knowledge controversially discusses whether neoadjuvant radiotherapy or perioperative chemotherapy represents superior therapeutic options to prolong survival or cause less toxicity. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 76 patients with locally advanced EAC or AEGJ treated at our tertiary cancer center between January 2015 and March 2023. Patients received either perioperative FLOT chemotherapy (n = 36) or neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy following the CROSS protocol (n = 40), followed by surgical resection and standardized follow-up. We compared survival outcomes, toxicity profiles, treatment compliance, and surgical results between the two groups. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between FLOT and CROSS treatments in five-year loco-regional controls (LRC: 61.5% vs. 68.6%; p = 0.81), progression-free survival (PFS: 33.9% vs. 42.8%; p = 0.82), overall survival (OS: 60.2% vs. 63.4%; p = 0.91), or distant controls (DC: 42.1% vs. 56.5%; p = 0.39). High-grade hematologic toxicities did not significantly differ between groups (p > 0.05). Treatment compliance was lower in the FLOT group, with 50% (18/36) not completing all the planned chemotherapy cycles, compared to 17.5% (7/40) in the CROSS group. All the patients in the CROSS group received the full radiotherapy dose. Surgical outcomes and post-surgical tumor status were comparable between the groups. Conclusions: Although perioperative chemotherapy with FLOT has recently become a standard of care for locally advanced EAC and AEGJ, neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy per the CROSS protocol remains a well-tolerated alternative. In appropriately selected patients, both approaches yield comparable oncological outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Treatments of Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancers)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 13597 KiB  
Systematic Review
Current Research Trends and Hotspots in Radiotherapy Combined with Nanomaterials for Cancer Treatment: A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis
by Muyasha Abulimiti, Shiqin Dai, Ebara Mitsuhiro, Yu Sugawara, Yinuo Li, Hideyuki Sakurai and Yoshitaka Matsumoto
Nanomaterials 2025, 15(15), 1205; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15151205 - 6 Aug 2025
Abstract
This study investigated the evolving trends, current research hotspots, and future directions of radiotherapy combined with nanobiomaterials through a bibliometric analysis. Publications related to nanobiomaterials used in radiotherapy between 2004 and 2024 were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection database and [...] Read more.
This study investigated the evolving trends, current research hotspots, and future directions of radiotherapy combined with nanobiomaterials through a bibliometric analysis. Publications related to nanobiomaterials used in radiotherapy between 2004 and 2024 were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection database and analyzed using VOSviewer, R, and CiteSpace. China emerged as the leading contributor, accounting for 1051 publications (50.41%), followed by the USA. Liu Zhuang is the most productive author in this field. American Chemical Society (ACS) Nano published the most influential articles and accumulated the highest number of citations. Advanced Targeted Therapies in Cancer: Drug Nanocarriers, the Future of Chemotherapy was the most cited, with 1255 citations. Citation bursts have revealed emerging research trends in targeted delivery, cellular studies, co-delivery strategies, immunogenic cell death, polymeric nanoparticles, tumor research, and drug delivery systems, indicating potential avenues for future research. Over the past two decades, nanomaterials for radiotherapy have gained substantial attention. Key areas of focus include enhancing the efficacy of radiotherapy, achieving targeted drug delivery, minimizing adverse effects, and integrating nanomaterials with other therapeutic modalities. Future investigations are expected to improve the precision of radiotherapy, augment radiation effects, and optimize the tumor microenvironment. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

7 pages, 1809 KiB  
Case Report
Seronegative Paraneoplastic Opsoclonus–Myoclonus–Ataxia Syndrome Secondary to Low Volume Endocrine-Sensitive Malignancy of Likely Breast Origin
by Geraint Berger, Caitlin Jackson-Tarlton, Daniel Rayson, Alexander Silver, Mark Walsh and Ashley Drohan
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(8), 440; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32080440 - 6 Aug 2025
Abstract
A 51-year-old female presented to the emergency department with vertigo, visual disturbances, involuntary rapid repetitive eye movements, incoordination, and imbalance. Physical examination revealed opsoclonus, myoclonus, and bilateral limb and gait ataxia. Initial workup was negative for intracranial abnormalities, and no abnormalities were noted [...] Read more.
A 51-year-old female presented to the emergency department with vertigo, visual disturbances, involuntary rapid repetitive eye movements, incoordination, and imbalance. Physical examination revealed opsoclonus, myoclonus, and bilateral limb and gait ataxia. Initial workup was negative for intracranial abnormalities, and no abnormalities were noted on blood work or cerebrospinal fluid analysis. Tumor markers were within normal limits. As part of her diagnostic workup, a positron emission tomography (PET) scan was performed, which showed a highly FDG-avid solitary 7 mm left axillary lymph node. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous biopsy revealed metastatic poorly differentiated carcinoma. Histopathological examination could not conclusively distinguish between adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. She was diagnosed with seronegative opsoclonus-myoclonus ataxia syndrome of paraneoplastic origin from an occult primary malignancy and started on pulsatile corticosteroids and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), with only moderate symptomatic improvement. Given the anatomic location and immunohistochemical staining pattern of the lymph node, the malignancy was considered as being of primary breast origin. A left axillary lymph node dissection was performed, with 1/12 nodes testing positive for poorly differentiated carcinoma. The patient experienced significant improvement in her neurological symptoms 2–3 days following resection of the solitary malignant lymph node, largely regaining her functional independence. She went on to receive adjuvant radiotherapy to the breast and axilla, as well as adjuvant hormonal therapy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Surgical Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 1203 KiB  
Review
Deciphering the Role of Functional Ion Channels in Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs) and Their Therapeutic Implications
by Krishna Samanta, Gali Sri Venkata Sai Rishma Reddy, Neeraj Kumar Sharma and Pulak Kar
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(15), 7595; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26157595 - 6 Aug 2025
Abstract
Despite advances in medicine, cancer remains one of the foremost global health concerns. Conventional treatments like surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy have advanced with the emergence of targeted and immunotherapy approaches. However, therapeutic resistance and relapse remain major barriers to long-term success in cancer [...] Read more.
Despite advances in medicine, cancer remains one of the foremost global health concerns. Conventional treatments like surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy have advanced with the emergence of targeted and immunotherapy approaches. However, therapeutic resistance and relapse remain major barriers to long-term success in cancer treatment, often driven by cancer stem cells (CSCs). These rare, resilient cells can survive therapy and drive tumour regrowth, urging deeper investigation into the mechanisms underlying their persistence. CSCs express ion channels typical of excitable tissues, which, beyond electrophysiology, critically regulate CSC fate. However, the underlying regulatory mechanisms of these channels in CSCs remain largely unexplored and poorly understood. Nevertheless, the therapeutic potential of targeting CSC ion channels is immense, as it offers a powerful strategy to disrupt vital signalling pathways involved in numerous pathological conditions. In this review, we explore the diverse repertoire of ion channels expressed in CSCs and highlight recent mechanistic insights into how these channels modulate CSC behaviours, dynamics, and functions. We present a concise overview of ion channel-mediated CSC regulation, emphasizing their potential as novel diagnostic markers and therapeutic targets, and identifying key areas for future research. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ion Channels as a Potential Target in Pharmaceutical Designs 2.0)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

30 pages, 2414 KiB  
Review
Melittin-Based Nanoparticles for Cancer Therapy: Mechanisms, Applications, and Future Perspectives
by Joe Rizkallah, Nicole Charbel, Abdallah Yassine, Amal El Masri, Chris Raffoul, Omar El Sardouk, Malak Ghezzawi, Therese Abou Nasr and Firas Kreidieh
Pharmaceutics 2025, 17(8), 1019; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics17081019 - 6 Aug 2025
Abstract
Melittin, a cytolytic peptide derived from honeybee venom, has demonstrated potent anticancer activity through mechanisms such as membrane disruption, apoptosis induction, and modulation of key signaling pathways. Melittin exerts its anticancer activity by interacting with key molecular targets, including downregulation of the PI3K/Akt [...] Read more.
Melittin, a cytolytic peptide derived from honeybee venom, has demonstrated potent anticancer activity through mechanisms such as membrane disruption, apoptosis induction, and modulation of key signaling pathways. Melittin exerts its anticancer activity by interacting with key molecular targets, including downregulation of the PI3K/Akt and NF-κB signaling pathways, and by inducing mitochondrial apoptosis through reactive oxygen species generation and cytochrome c release. However, its clinical application is hindered by its systemic and hemolytic toxicity, rapid degradation in plasma, poor pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity, necessitating the development of targeted delivery strategies to enable safe and effective treatment. Nanoparticle-based delivery systems have emerged as a promising strategy for overcoming these challenges, offering improved tumor targeting, reduced off-target effects, and enhanced stability. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the mechanisms through which melittin exerts its anticancer effects and evaluates the development of various melittin-loaded nanocarriers, including liposomes, polymeric nanoparticles, dendrimers, micelles, and inorganic systems. It also summarizes the preclinical evidence for melittin nanotherapy across a wide range of cancer types, highlighting both its cytotoxic and immunomodulatory effects. The potential of melittin nanoparticles to overcome multidrug resistance and synergize with chemotherapy, immunotherapy, photothermal therapy, and radiotherapy is discussed. Despite promising in vitro and in vivo findings, its clinical translation remains limited. Key barriers include toxicity, manufacturing scalability, regulatory approval, and the need for more extensive in vivo validation. A key future direction is the application of computational tools, such as physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling and artificial-intelligence-based modeling, to streamline development and guide its clinical translation. Addressing these challenges through focused research and interdisciplinary collaboration will be essential to realizing the full therapeutic potential of melittin-based nanomedicines in oncology. Overall, this review synthesizes the findings from over 100 peer-reviewed studies published between 2008 and 2025, providing an up-to-date assessment of melittin-based nanomedicine strategies across diverse cancer types. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Development of Novel Tumor-Targeting Nanoparticles, 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1517 KiB  
Article
Adverse Pathology After Radical Prostatectomy in Low- and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Long-Term Health-Related Quality of Life
by Michael Chaloupka, Alexander Buchner, Marc Kidess, Benedikt Ebner, Yannic Volz, Nikolaos Pyrgidis, Stephan Timo Ledderose, Dirk-André Clevert, Julian Marcon, Philipp Weinhold, Christian G. Stief and Maria Apfelbeck
Diagnostics 2025, 15(15), 1969; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15151969 - 6 Aug 2025
Abstract
Background and Objective: Adverse pathology to high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) after radical prostatectomy (upgrading) poses a threat to risk stratification and treatment planning. The impact on sexual function, urinary continence, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) remains unclear. Methods: From 2004 [...] Read more.
Background and Objective: Adverse pathology to high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) after radical prostatectomy (upgrading) poses a threat to risk stratification and treatment planning. The impact on sexual function, urinary continence, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) remains unclear. Methods: From 2004 to 2024, 4189 patients with preop low-/intermediate-risk PCa (Gleason score 6 or 7a, PSA ≤ 20 ng/mL) underwent radical prostatectomy at our department and were analyzed. Primary endpoint was HRQOL, erectile function, and urinary continence. Secondary endpoint was rate of salvage therapies and biochemical-free survival. Propensity score matching was performed using “operative time”, “robot-assisted surgery”, “blood loss”, “nerve-sparing surgery”, “age”, and “BMI” to represent comparable surgical approach. Median follow-up was 39 months (Interquartile-range (IQR) 15–60). Key Findings and Limitations: Patients who were upgraded to high-risk PCa showed a higher rate of postoperative radiotherapy and androgen-deprivation therapy compared to patients who were not upgraded (21% vs. 7%, p < 0.001; 9% vs. 3%, p = 0.002). Five-year biochemical recurrence-free survival was 68% in the upgrading group vs. 84% in the no-upgrading group (p < 0.001). We saw no difference in patient-reported HRQOL, urinary continence, or erectile function. Multivariable analysis showed that postoperative upgrading was a significant risk for not achieving good overall HRQOL (OR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.61–0.97, p = 0.028) during the follow-up. Conclusions and Clinical Implications: Although postoperative upgrading to high-risk PCa leads to worse oncologic outcomes and higher salvage therapy rates, this study indicates that its impact on health-related quality of life is minimal and should not deter a cautious approach to radical prostatectomy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Clinical Diagnosis and Prognosis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 3765 KiB  
Article
PSMA-Targeted Radiolabeled Peptide for Imaging and Therapy in Prostate Cancer: Preclinical Evaluation of Biodistribution and Therapeutic Efficacy
by Ming-Wei Chen, Yuan-Ruei Huang, Wei-Lin Lo, Shih-Ying Lee, Sheng-Nan Lo, Shih-Ming Wang and Kang-Wei Chang
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(15), 7580; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26157580 - 5 Aug 2025
Abstract
Albumin-binding agents enhance tumor uptake of radiopharmaceuticals targeting prostate-specific membrane antigens (PSMAs) in radiotherapy. We synthesized PSMA-NARI-56, a molecule with both PSMA targeting activity and albumin-binding moiety, labeled with 177Lu as the therapeutic agent. The aim of this study was to determine [...] Read more.
Albumin-binding agents enhance tumor uptake of radiopharmaceuticals targeting prostate-specific membrane antigens (PSMAs) in radiotherapy. We synthesized PSMA-NARI-56, a molecule with both PSMA targeting activity and albumin-binding moiety, labeled with 177Lu as the therapeutic agent. The aim of this study was to determine the specific binding of 177Lu-PSMA-NARI-56 towards PSMA, assess its biodistribution, and evaluate therapeutic effectiveness by tumor-bearing mice. The effect of 177Lu-PSMA-NARI-56 viability of PSMA-positive cell (LNCaP) was evaluated. Biodistribution and endoradiotherapy studies were utilized to determine the distribution, targeting, and anti-tumor efficacy by tumor-bearing mice identified by 111In-PSMA-NARI-56. 177Lu-PSMA-NARI-56 exhibited a significant impact on the viability of the LNCaP cell. Biodistribution results revealed the maximum tumor uptake of 177Lu-PSMA-NARI-56 occurring within 24 h, reaching 40.56 ± 10.01%ID/g. In radionuclide therapy, at 58 days post-injection (p.i.), 177Lu-PSMA-NARI-56 demonstrated superior tumor inhibition (98%) compared to 177Lu-PSMA-617 (58%), and the mouse survival rate after 90 days of radiotherapy (90%) was also higher than that of 177Lu-PSMA-617 (30%) in LNCaP tumor-bearing mice. In the PSMA-positive animal model, 177Lu-PSMA-NARI-56 shows higher potential radiotheranostic and prolonged accumulation (identify by 111In-PSMA-NARI-56/nanoSPECT/CT image), offering the potential for improved treatment effectiveness and increased survival rates when compared to 177Lu-PSMA-617. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Pathology, Diagnostics, and Therapeutics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 746 KiB  
Review
Prospects and Challenges of Lung Cancer Vaccines
by Zhen Lin, Zegang Chen, Lijiao Pei, Yueyun Chen and Zhenyu Ding
Vaccines 2025, 13(8), 836; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13080836 - 5 Aug 2025
Abstract
Lung cancer remains one of the most prevalent and lethal malignancies worldwide. Although conventional treatments such as surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy have modestly improved patient survival, their overall efficacy remains limited, and the prognosis is generally poor. In recent years, immunotherapy, particularly immune [...] Read more.
Lung cancer remains one of the most prevalent and lethal malignancies worldwide. Although conventional treatments such as surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy have modestly improved patient survival, their overall efficacy remains limited, and the prognosis is generally poor. In recent years, immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors, has revolutionized cancer treatment. Nevertheless, the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, tumor heterogeneity, and immune escape mechanisms significantly restrict the clinical benefit, which falls short of expectations. Within this context, cancer vaccines have emerged as a promising immunotherapeutic strategy. By activating the host immune system to eliminate tumor cells, cancer vaccines offer high specificity, low toxicity, and the potential to induce long-lasting immune memory. These advantages have positioned them as a focal point in cancer immunotherapy research. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of recent clinical advances in lung cancer vaccines, discusses the major challenges impeding their clinical application, and explores potential strategies to overcome these barriers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Vaccination Against Cancer and Chronic Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 2501 KiB  
Article
Therapeutic Patterns and Surgical Decision-Making in Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Regional Cohort Study in Romania
by Ramona Andreea Cioroianu, Michael Schenker, Virginia-Maria Rădulescu, Tradian Ciprian Berisha, George Ovidiu Cioroianu, Mihaela Popescu, Cristina Mihaela Ciofiac, Ana Maria Petrescu and Stelian Ștefăniță Mogoantă
Clin. Pract. 2025, 15(8), 145; https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract15080145 - 5 Aug 2025
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer is the most prevalent malignancy among women globally. In Romania, it is the most frequent form of cancer affecting women, with approximately 12,000 new cases diagnosed annually, and the second most common cause of cancer-related mortality, second only to [...] Read more.
Background: Breast cancer is the most prevalent malignancy among women globally. In Romania, it is the most frequent form of cancer affecting women, with approximately 12,000 new cases diagnosed annually, and the second most common cause of cancer-related mortality, second only to lung cancer. Methods: This study looked at 79 breast cancer patients from Oltenia, concentrating on epidemiology, histology, diagnostic features, and treatments. Patients were chosen based on inclusion criteria such as histopathologically verified diagnosis, availability of clinical and treatment data, and follow-up information. The analyzed biological material consisted of tissue samples taken from the breast parenchyma and axillary lymph nodes. Even though not the primary subject of this paper, all patients underwent immunohistochemical (IHC) evaluation both preoperatively and postoperatively. Results: We found invasive ductal carcinoma to be the predominant type, while ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and mixed types were rare. We performed cross-tabulations of metastasis versus nodal status and age versus therapy type; none reached significance (all p > 0.05), suggesting observed differences were likely due to chance. A chi-square test comparing surgical interventions (breast-conserving vs. mastectomy) in patients who did or did not receive chemotherapy showed, χ2 = 3.17, p = 0.367, indicating that chemotherapy did not significantly influence surgical choice. Importantly, adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy were used at similar rates across age groups, whereas neoadjuvant hormonal (endocrine) therapy was more common in older patients (but without statistical significance). Conclusions: Finally, we discussed the consequences of individualized care and early detection. Romania’s shockingly low screening rate, which contributes to delayed diagnosis, emphasizes the importance of improved population medical examination and tailored treatment options. Also, the country has one of the lowest rates of mammography uptake in Europe and no systematic population screening program. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 1642 KiB  
Review
The Multifaceted Role of Autophagy in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Translational Perspectives on Pathogenesis, Biomarkers, Treatment Resistance, and Emerging Therapies
by Abdul L. Shakerdi, Emma Finnegan, Yin-Yin Sheng and Graham P. Pidgeon
Cancers 2025, 17(15), 2577; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17152577 - 5 Aug 2025
Abstract
Background: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is an epithelial malignancy arising from the nasopharyngeal mucosa. Despite treatment advances such as the use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors, resistance remains a significant clinical challenge. Many tumours are also diagnosed at an advanced stage associated [...] Read more.
Background: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is an epithelial malignancy arising from the nasopharyngeal mucosa. Despite treatment advances such as the use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors, resistance remains a significant clinical challenge. Many tumours are also diagnosed at an advanced stage associated with poor prognosis. Objective: This review aims to explore the biological roles of autophagy in NPC, primarily highlighting its involvement in disease pathogenesis and treatment resistance. Methods: We performed a review of the recent literature examining the role of autophagy-related pathways in NPC pathogenesis, biomarker discovery, and therapeutic targeting. Results: Autophagy plays a dual role in NPC as it contributes to both tumour suppression and progression. It is involved in tumour initiation, metastasis, immune modulation, and treatment resistance. Autophagy-related genes such as SQSTM1, Beclin-1, and AURKA may serve as prognostic and therapeutic biomarkers. Various strategies are being investigated for their role to modulate autophagy using pharmacologic inhibitors, RNA interventions, and natural compounds. Conclusions: Further research into autophagy’s context-dependent roles in NPC may inform the development of personalised therapies and allow progress in translational and precision oncology. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

34 pages, 1543 KiB  
Review
Treatment Strategies for Cutaneous and Oral Mucosal Side Effects of Oncological Treatment in Breast Cancer: A Comprehensive Review
by Sanja Brnić, Bruno Špiljak, Lucija Zanze, Ema Barac, Robert Likić and Liborija Lugović-Mihić
Biomedicines 2025, 13(8), 1901; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13081901 - 4 Aug 2025
Viewed by 240
Abstract
Cutaneous and oral mucosal adverse events (AEs) are among the most common non-hematologic toxicities observed during breast cancer treatment. These complications arise across various therapeutic modalities including chemotherapy, targeted therapy, hormonal therapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy. Although often underrecognized compared with systemic side effects, [...] Read more.
Cutaneous and oral mucosal adverse events (AEs) are among the most common non-hematologic toxicities observed during breast cancer treatment. These complications arise across various therapeutic modalities including chemotherapy, targeted therapy, hormonal therapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy. Although often underrecognized compared with systemic side effects, dermatologic and mucosal toxicities can severely impact the patients’ quality of life, leading to psychosocial distress, pain, and reduced treatment adherence. In severe cases, these toxicities may necessitate dose reductions, treatment delays, or discontinuation, thereby compromising oncologic outcomes. The growing use of precision medicine and novel targeted agents has broadened the spectrum of AEs, with some therapies linked to distinct dermatologic syndromes and mucosal complications such as mucositis, xerostomia, and lichenoid reactions. Early detection, accurate classification, and timely multidisciplinary management are essential for mitigating these effects. This review provides a comprehensive synthesis of current knowledge on cutaneous and oral mucosal toxicities associated with modern breast cancer therapies. Particular attention is given to clinical presentation, underlying pathophysiology, incidence, and evidence-based prevention and management strategies. We also explore emerging approaches, including nanoparticle-based delivery systems and personalized interventions, which may reduce toxicity without compromising therapeutic efficacy. By emphasizing the integration of dermatologic and mucosal care, this review aims to support clinicians in preserving treatment adherence and enhancing the overall therapeutic experience in breast cancer patients. The novelty of this review lies in its dual focus on cutaneous and oral complications across all major therapeutic classes, including recent biologic and immunotherapeutic agents, and its emphasis on multidisciplinary, patient-centered strategies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Biology and Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

33 pages, 1598 KiB  
Review
Research Strategies and Methods of Hydrogels for Antitumor Drug Delivery
by Tianjiao Zeng, Lusi Chen, Toru Yoshitomi, Naoki Kawazoe, Yingnan Yang and Guoping Chen
Biomedicines 2025, 13(8), 1899; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13081899 - 4 Aug 2025
Viewed by 257
Abstract
Tumor treatments have substantially advanced through various approaches, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, and gene therapy. However, efficient treatment necessitates overcoming physiological barriers that impede the delivery of therapeutic agents to target sites. Drug delivery systems (DDSs) are a prominent research area, particularly in [...] Read more.
Tumor treatments have substantially advanced through various approaches, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, and gene therapy. However, efficient treatment necessitates overcoming physiological barriers that impede the delivery of therapeutic agents to target sites. Drug delivery systems (DDSs) are a prominent research area, particularly in tumor therapy. This review provides a comprehensive overview of hydrogel-based DDSs for tumor treatment, focusing on the strategies and designs of DDSs based on the unique pathophysiological characteristics of tumors. The design and preparation of hydrogel systems for DDSs are summarized and highlighted. The challenges and opportunities for translating hydrogel-based DDSs into clinical applications are discussed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Drug Discovery, Development and Delivery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop