Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (14)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = oral reading fluency

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
24 pages, 1196 KB  
Systematic Review
A Systematic Quantitative Literature Review of the Contribution of Phonics to Overall Reading Performance for Primary Students
by Beryl Exley, Kylie Zee Bradfield, Danielle H. Heinrichs and Sonja Clancy
Encyclopedia 2026, 6(3), 61; https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia6030061 - 13 Mar 2026
Viewed by 1204
Abstract
This Systematic Quantitative Literature Review (SQLR) examines instructional content (the what) and instructional strategies (the how) that contribute to overall reading performance for students in mainstream English-speaking primary classes. Drawing on 163 peer-reviewed studies published over four and a half decades, the authors [...] Read more.
This Systematic Quantitative Literature Review (SQLR) examines instructional content (the what) and instructional strategies (the how) that contribute to overall reading performance for students in mainstream English-speaking primary classes. Drawing on 163 peer-reviewed studies published over four and a half decades, the authors examine instructional content and strategies aligned with six interrelated foundational elements of reading development: phonological awareness, phonics, vocabulary, fluency, comprehension, and oral language. In response to the proliferation of reading research and the limitations of narrative reviews, the five iterative phases of the SQLR method enable rigorous selection, coding, and synthesis of studies reporting quantitative evidence of the contribution of instructional content and strategies to students’ overall reading performance. The second part of the paper focuses on phonics instruction, an element of the teaching of reading central to ongoing public, educational, and political debate. The authors identify significant variation in terms of the scale, duration, and year-levels of the reported research, and foreground the complex roles of teacher professional learning, teachers’ pedagogical decision-making, and implementation fidelity in shaping the research projects. The paper finishes by synthesizing evidence that concludes that while phonics instruction can contribute to overall reading performance, its effects are variable and contingent on specific instructional and contextual conditions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Social Sciences)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 1237 KB  
Article
Understanding the Role of Reading and Oral Language Skills Growth in Overcoming Reading Comprehension Difficulties
by Apostolos Kargiotidis and George Manolitsis
Behav. Sci. 2026, 16(1), 90; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16010090 - 8 Jan 2026
Viewed by 693
Abstract
The present longitudinal retrospective study examined in a sample of 123 Greek-speaking children whether the raw score growth in a broad range of oral language and reading skills from Grade 1 to Grade 3 differs among children with persistent reading comprehension difficulties (pRCD; [...] Read more.
The present longitudinal retrospective study examined in a sample of 123 Greek-speaking children whether the raw score growth in a broad range of oral language and reading skills from Grade 1 to Grade 3 differs among children with persistent reading comprehension difficulties (pRCD; N = 49) identified in Grade 3, those exhibiting a resolving tendency of RCD (rRCD; N = 16), and typically developing (TD; N = 58) children. Children were classified into the respective groups, based on their performance on standardized reading comprehension measures in Grades 1, 2, and 3. They were, also, assessed on phonological awareness, rapid automatized naming (RAN), morphological awareness, vocabulary, word reading accuracy, word reading fluency, and text-reading fluency across the three Grades. Mixed ANOVAs showed that children with pRCD displayed slower growth in morphological awareness, word reading fluency, and text-reading fluency than the other two groups. Children with rRCD did not differ from TD children on these measures, but they exhibited a higher growth on RAN. Both groups of children with RCD outperformed TD children on the growth of phonological awareness and word reading accuracy, whereas no group differences revealed in vocabulary. Our results suggest that more rapid gains in morphological awareness, RAN, word reading fluency, and text-reading fluency over time might be associated with a resolving tendency of reading comprehension difficulties, providing valuable insights for intervention policy. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

36 pages, 1309 KB  
Article
Listen Closely: Self-Supervised Phoneme Tracking for Children’s Reading Assessment
by Philipp Ollmann, Erik Sonnleitner, Marc Kurz, Jens Krösche and Stephan Selinger
Information 2026, 17(1), 40; https://doi.org/10.3390/info17010040 - 4 Jan 2026
Viewed by 801
Abstract
Reading proficiency in early childhood is crucial for academic success and intellectual development. However, more and more children are struggling with reading. According to the last PISA study in Austria, one out of five children is dealing with reading difficulties. The reasons for [...] Read more.
Reading proficiency in early childhood is crucial for academic success and intellectual development. However, more and more children are struggling with reading. According to the last PISA study in Austria, one out of five children is dealing with reading difficulties. The reasons for this are diverse, but an application that tracks children while reading aloud and guides them when they experience difficulties could offer meaningful help. Therefore, this proposal explores a prototyping approach for a core component that tracks children’s reading using a self-supervised Wav2Vec2 model with a limited amount of data. Self-supervised learning allows models to learn general representations from large amounts of unlabeled audio, which can then be fine-tuned on smaller, task-specific datasets, making it especially useful when labeled data is limited. Our model is operating on the phonetic level with the help of the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA). To implement this, the KidsTALC dataset from the Leibniz University Hannover was used, which contains spontaneous speech recordings of German-speaking children. To enhance the training data and improve robustness, several data augmentation techniques were applied and evaluated, including pitch shifting, formant shifting, and speed variation. The models were trained using different data configurations to compare the effects of data variety and quality on recognition performance. The best model trained in this work achieved a phoneme error rate (PER) of 14.3% and a word error rate (WER) of 31.6% on unseen child speech data, demonstrating the potential of self-supervised models for such use cases. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue AI Technology-Enhanced Learning and Teaching)
Show Figures

Figure 1

32 pages, 806 KB  
Systematic Review
Safety and Efficacy of Different Therapeutic Interventions for Primary Progressive Aphasia: A Systematic Review
by Abdulrahim Saleh Alrasheed, Reem Ali Alshamrani, Abdullah Ali Al Ameer, Reham Mohammed Alkahtani, Noor Mohammad AlMohish, Mustafa Ahmed AlQarni and Majed Mohammad Alabdali
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(9), 3063; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14093063 - 29 Apr 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 5486
Abstract
Background: Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is a neurodegenerative disorder that worsens over time without appropriate treatment. Although referral to a speech and language pathologist is essential for diagnosing language deficits and developing effective treatment plans, there is no scientific consensus regarding the [...] Read more.
Background: Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is a neurodegenerative disorder that worsens over time without appropriate treatment. Although referral to a speech and language pathologist is essential for diagnosing language deficits and developing effective treatment plans, there is no scientific consensus regarding the most effective treatment. Thus, our study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of various therapeutic interventions for PPA. Methods: Google Scholar, PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched to identify articles assessing different therapeutic interventions for PPA. To ensure comprehensive coverage, the search strategy employed specific medical subject headings. The primary outcome measure was language gain; the secondary outcome assessed overall therapeutic effects. Data on study characteristics, patient demographics, PPA subtypes, therapeutic modalities, and treatment patterns were collected. Results: Fifty-seven studies with 655 patients were included. For naming and word finding, errorless learning therapy, lexical retrieval cascade (LRC), semantic feature training, smartphone-based cognitive therapy, picture-naming therapy, and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) maintained effects for up to six months. Repetitive rTMS, video-implemented script training for aphasia (VISTA), and structured oral reading therapy improved speech fluency. Sole transcranial treatments enhanced auditory verbal comprehension, whereas transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with language or cognitive therapy improved repetition abilities. Phonological and orthographic treatments improved reading accuracy across PPA subtypes. tDCS combined with speech therapy enhanced mini-mental state examination (MMSE) scores and cognitive function. Several therapies, including smartphone-based cognitive therapy and VISTA therapy, demonstrated sustained language improvements over six months. Conclusions: Various therapeutic interventions offer potential benefits for individuals with PPA. However, due to the heterogeneity in study designs, administration methods, small sample sizes, and lack of standardized measurement methods, drawing a firm conclusion is difficult. Further studies are warranted to establish evidence-based treatment protocols. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 756 KB  
Article
Predictive Language Processing in Russian Heritage Speakers: Task Effects on Morphosyntactic Prediction in Reading
by Olga Parshina, Nina Ladinskaya, Lidia Gault and Irina A. Sekerina
Languages 2024, 9(5), 158; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages9050158 - 26 Apr 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 3652
Abstract
This study investigates the effect of task demands on the predictive processing of morphosyntactic cues (word class, noun/adjective gender, case, and number) in reading among Heritage Speakers of Russian (N = 29), comparing them with Russian language learners (N = 29) and monolingual [...] Read more.
This study investigates the effect of task demands on the predictive processing of morphosyntactic cues (word class, noun/adjective gender, case, and number) in reading among Heritage Speakers of Russian (N = 29), comparing them with Russian language learners (N = 29) and monolingual Russian speakers (N = 63). Following the utility account of bilingual prediction, we hypothesized that the predictive use of morphosyntactic cues would be more evident in a less-demanding reading cloze task (Experiment 1) than in a more-challenging eye-tracking reading task (Experiment 2), and for cues that RHSs regard as more reliable (word class and number vs. gender and case cues). The results confirmed our predictions: In Experiment 1, Heritage Speakers (and L2 learners) used all cues predictively to generate the upcoming lexical item, with higher accuracy for word class and number cues compared to gender and case cues. In Experiment 2, in contrast to monolingual readers, neither Heritage Speakers nor L2 learners used gender cues on adjectives to anticipate the gender of the upcoming noun. The results are discussed in respect to the interplay between task demands, cue weight, oral fluency, and Russian literacy experience. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Heritage Russian Bilingualism across the Lifespan)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 838 KB  
Article
A Gender Bias in Curriculum-Based Measurement across Content Domains: Insights from a German Study
by Florian Klapproth and Holger von der Lippe
Educ. Sci. 2024, 14(1), 76; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14010076 - 9 Jan 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 3610
Abstract
By immediately responding to achievement progress data, teachers can improve students’ performance by using curriculum-based measurement. However, there are studies showing that teachers are prone to make biased judgments about the students providing the data. The present investigation experimentally examined whether pre-service teachers [...] Read more.
By immediately responding to achievement progress data, teachers can improve students’ performance by using curriculum-based measurement. However, there are studies showing that teachers are prone to make biased judgments about the students providing the data. The present investigation experimentally examined whether pre-service teachers in Germany were biased by the use of gender stereotypes when judging students’ achievement derived from progress data. N = 100 pre-service teachers received graphs that depicted the development of either oral reading fluency or math achievement of girls and boys over a time interval of 11 weeks. The results obtained confirmed the hypotheses partially. The participants did not favor girls over boys on average. However, they judged achievement in reading to be higher for girls than for boys, and math achievement to be higher for boys than for girls. The results suggest that gender stereotypes (boys are good at math, girls are good at reading) are still prevalent in pre-service teachers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Education and Psychology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 797 KB  
Article
Measuring Oral Reading Fluency (ORF) Computer-Based and Paper-Based: Examining the Mode Effect in Reading Accuracy and Reading Fluency
by Jana Jungjohann, Jeffrey M. DeVries and Markus Gebhardt
Educ. Sci. 2023, 13(6), 624; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13060624 - 19 Jun 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 8959
Abstract
Internationally, teachers use oral reading fluency (ORF) measurements to monitor learning progress in reading and adapt instruction to the individual needs of students. In ORF measures, the child reads aloud single syllables, words, or short passages, and the teacher rates in parallel at [...] Read more.
Internationally, teachers use oral reading fluency (ORF) measurements to monitor learning progress in reading and adapt instruction to the individual needs of students. In ORF measures, the child reads aloud single syllables, words, or short passages, and the teacher rates in parallel at which items the child makes a mistake. Since administering paper-based ORF requires increased effort on the part of teachers, computer-based test administration is available. However, there are still concerns about the comparability of paper-based and computer-based test modes. In our study, we examine mode effects between paper-based and computer-based test scores for both reading speed and reading accuracy using a German-language ORF assessment for progress monitoring. 2nd- and 3rd-year-students (N = 359) with and without special education needs participated in the study. Results show comparable and high reliability (r > 0.76) and no differential item functioning for both test modes. Furthermore, students showed significantly higher reading speed on the paper-based test, while no differences were found in reading accuracy. In the absence of differential item functioning, we discuss how mean differences can be accounted for, how teachers can be trained to use the different test modes, and how computer-based tests can be safeguarded in practice. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Technology Enhanced Education)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 1264 KB  
Article
Short Vestibular and Cognitive Training Improves Oral Reading Fluency in Children with Dyslexia
by Simona Caldani, Lionel Moiroud, Carole Miquel, Vanessa Peiffer, Alessandro Florian and Maria Pia Bucci
Brain Sci. 2021, 11(11), 1440; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11111440 - 29 Oct 2021
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 4710
Abstract
(1) Background: This study explored the effect of short vestibular and cognitive training on the reading speed in dyslexic children. (2) Methods: The reading speed was evaluated by using a reading test (Évaluation de la Lecture en FluencE, ELFE) in a crossover design [...] Read more.
(1) Background: This study explored the effect of short vestibular and cognitive training on the reading speed in dyslexic children. (2) Methods: The reading speed was evaluated by using a reading test (Évaluation de la Lecture en FluencE, ELFE) in a crossover design before (baseline) and after vestibular training (post VT) and no vestibular training (post no VT). Nineteen dyslexic children (9.48 ± 0.15 years) participated in the study. The vestibular and cognitive training (software developed by BeonSolution S.r.l.) consisted in four exercises presented on a Wacom tablet 10″ done for 16 min per session two times per week for four weeks; each exercise was composed of eight levels with increased difficulty. (3) Results: Following vestibular and cognitive training, dyslexic children increased their reading speed; interestingly, such an increase persisted at least one month after training. (4) Conclusions: Vestibular and cognitive training could improve the vestibular network, which is well known for being involved in several cognition functions leading to reading improvement in dyslexic children. Adaptive mechanisms could be responsible for maintaining such improvement for at least one month. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neurobiological Basis of Developmental Dyslexia)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 301 KB  
Article
Features of Known and Unknown Words for First Graders of Different Proficiency Levels in Winter and Spring
by Elfrieda H. Hiebert, Yukie Toyama and Robin Irey
Educ. Sci. 2020, 10(12), 389; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10120389 - 18 Dec 2020
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 5004
Abstract
This study describes the features of words known and unknown by first graders of different proficiency levels in six instances of an oral reading fluency assessment: three in winter and three in spring. A sample of 411 students was placed into four groups [...] Read more.
This study describes the features of words known and unknown by first graders of different proficiency levels in six instances of an oral reading fluency assessment: three in winter and three in spring. A sample of 411 students was placed into four groups (very high, high, middle, and low) based on their median correct words per minute in spring. Each word in the assessment was coded on 11 features: numbers of phonemes, letters, syllables, blends, morphemes, percentages of multisyllabic and of morphologically complex words, concreteness, age of acquisition, decodability, and U function. Words were classified as known if more than 50% of the students within a group were able to correctly read those words. Features of known and unknown words were contrasted for all but the highest group, which made no errors, at each point in time. An analysis of the patterns of known words across groups from winter to spring shows that students followed a similar general progression in the number and type of words recognized. The most prominent feature of unknown words in winter and spring for the middle group of students was the presence of multiple syllables. The lowest-performing group of students continued to be limited by word length and frequency in their recognition of words, but on both features, their proficiency increased from winter to spring. The discussion addresses several critical issues, most notably the relationship of words in oral reading assessments to the word recognition curriculum of many beginning reading programs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Curriculum and Instruction)
11 pages, 203 KB  
Article
Fluency: Deep Roots in Reading Instruction
by William H. Rupley, William Dee Nichols, Timothy V. Rasinski and David Paige
Educ. Sci. 2020, 10(6), 155; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10060155 - 3 Jun 2020
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 15349
Abstract
Over the past two decades, reading fluency has been increasingly recognized as an important instructional variable for success in reading. Yet, this has not always been the case. This article presents a historical review of the nature and role of fluency instruction in [...] Read more.
Over the past two decades, reading fluency has been increasingly recognized as an important instructional variable for success in reading. Yet, this has not always been the case. This article presents a historical review of the nature and role of fluency instruction in the United States. The roots of oral reading fluency began in an age when texts and other forms of entertainment and information were limited. Historically, in America, oral reading was the predominant means for conveying ideas and passing the time at home with the family. In the 1800s, American education’s primary method of instruction emphasized the need for being able to read aloud with expression and fluency, in order to hold the listeners’ attention and convey information. As texts and other forms of information became more available, oral reading became deemphasized, and silent reading was viewed as a better approach to developing readers’ comprehension at the cost of fluency development. With continued research and national reports that indicate the significant contributions of oral reading fluency to reading comprehension and academic proficiency, it is clear that the roots of oral reading run deep, and that fluent reading development is important to learners’ academic achievement and reading comprehension. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Reading Fluency)
11 pages, 220 KB  
Article
Whole Class or Small Group Fluency Instruction: A Tutorial of Four Effective Approaches
by Melanie R. Kuhn
Educ. Sci. 2020, 10(5), 145; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10050145 - 21 May 2020
Cited by 17 | Viewed by 14752
Abstract
Four scientifically validated approaches to fluency instruction (Fluency-Oriented Reading Instruction, Wide Fluency-Oriented Reading Instruction, Fluency-Oriented Oral Reading, and Wide Fluency-Oriented Oral Reading) are reviewed. Two for the whole class and two for small groups. Key components of fluency, automaticity, and prosody are defined, [...] Read more.
Four scientifically validated approaches to fluency instruction (Fluency-Oriented Reading Instruction, Wide Fluency-Oriented Reading Instruction, Fluency-Oriented Oral Reading, and Wide Fluency-Oriented Oral Reading) are reviewed. Two for the whole class and two for small groups. Key components of fluency, automaticity, and prosody are defined, and their contribution to reading comprehension is discussed. Automaticity contributes through its freeing up of attention to attend to meaning, and prosody contributes through its addressing of pacing and expression that, in turn, reflect textual meaning. Four principles for effective fluency instruction are also presented: Modeling, extensive opportunities for practice, the use of scaffolding, and the incorporation of prosodic elements. The four instructional approaches presented in this article are based on two different strategies for integrating extensive opportunities to read: Repeated versus wide reading. All four approaches use challenging texts, or texts at the upper end of the learners’ zone of proximal development, thus providing learners with access to a broader range of vocabulary and concepts than would be the case if they read only instructional level texts. All four also provided highly effective procedures for either whole-class or small-group reading instruction. The goal of this summary is to provide readers with effective approaches for classroom instruction. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Reading Fluency)
13 pages, 246 KB  
Review
Assessing Expressive Oral Reading Fluency
by Timothy G. Morrison and Brad Wilcox
Educ. Sci. 2020, 10(3), 59; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10030059 - 4 Mar 2020
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 11562
Abstract
Educators struggle to assess various aspects of reading in valid and reliable ways. Whether it is comprehension, phonological awareness, vocabulary, or phonics, determining appropriate assessments is challenging across grade levels and student abilities. Also challenging is measuring aspects of fluency: rate, accuracy, and [...] Read more.
Educators struggle to assess various aspects of reading in valid and reliable ways. Whether it is comprehension, phonological awareness, vocabulary, or phonics, determining appropriate assessments is challenging across grade levels and student abilities. Also challenging is measuring aspects of fluency: rate, accuracy, and prosody. This article presents a history of fluency in American education with particular focus on assessing expressive oral reading. In addition, the two major approaches to prosody assessment will be explained, and the three most prominent tools for rating expressive oral reading will be analyzed and discussed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Reading Fluency)
23 pages, 1390 KB  
Article
Effects of Fluency Oriented Instruction on Motivation for Reading of Struggling Readers
by Gene Mehigan
Educ. Sci. 2020, 10(3), 56; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10030056 - 3 Mar 2020
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 15052
Abstract
This paper looks at the effects of an intervention, based on fluency oriented reading instruction (FORI), on the motivation for reading among struggling readers in First Class in Irish primary schools. The intervention took place in learning support settings in three primary schools [...] Read more.
This paper looks at the effects of an intervention, based on fluency oriented reading instruction (FORI), on the motivation for reading among struggling readers in First Class in Irish primary schools. The intervention took place in learning support settings in three primary schools located in urban educationally disadvantaged communities in North Dublin. The study was conducted through a pragmatic lens with research questions framed to shed light on the motivation for reading of students in First Class from disadvantaged backgrounds. A mixed methods design with a concurrent triangulation strategy was employed, facilitating the exploration of multiple research questions using questionnaires and semi-structured interviews with teachers and parents and conversational interviews and surveys with students. The perspective of reading motivation guiding the study recognised the overlapping influences of teachers, parents and the student himself or herself. Findings, as reported by these research informants, indicate that the FORI intervention had a positive impact on the motivation for reading of struggling readers in First Class. In particular, the intervention was found to decrease students’ perceived difficulty with reading and increase their reading self-efficacy and orientation towards reading. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Reading Fluency)
Show Figures

Figure 1

28 pages, 514 KB  
Review
Fluency Interventions for Elementary Students with Reading Difficulties: A Synthesis of Research from 2000–2019
by Alida Hudson, Poh Wee Koh, Karol A. Moore and Emily Binks-Cantrell
Educ. Sci. 2020, 10(3), 52; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10030052 - 28 Feb 2020
Cited by 49 | Viewed by 43905
Abstract
Oral reading fluency (ORF) deficits are a hallmark of reading difficulties. The impact of fluency struggles extends beyond word-level difficulties to include deficits in reading comprehension. Sixteen empirical studies conducted in 2000–2019 that examined ORF interventions among elementary students identified as having reading [...] Read more.
Oral reading fluency (ORF) deficits are a hallmark of reading difficulties. The impact of fluency struggles extends beyond word-level difficulties to include deficits in reading comprehension. Sixteen empirical studies conducted in 2000–2019 that examined ORF interventions among elementary students identified as having reading difficulties were reviewed to identify the characteristics (e.g., instructional variables, group size, type of interventionist) of effective ORF interventions and their impact on English oral reading fluency and reading comprehension outcomes. The systematic review revealed that interventions reported centered around repeated reading procedures (86.5%). Across the 16 studies, outcomes for oral reading fluency varied widely and most focused on speed and rate aspects rather than prosody. Effect sizes for rate and accuracy measures ranged from negligible to large (i.e., 0.01 to 1.18) and three studies found large effects for prosody outcomes. Effect sizes for reading comprehension ranged between non-significant and large significant effects. Findings support the use of repeated reading of text to build up ORF of students with reading difficulties. Interventions that were found to be most effective were those that were conducted one-on-one with a trained model of fluent word reading and accuracy. Findings also point to three gaps in our understanding: (1) the efficacy of interventions other than repeated reading, (2) effects of ORF interventions on prosody outcomes, and (3) sustainability of outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Reading Fluency)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop