Next Article in Journal
Detecting Mind-Wandering from Eye Movement and Oculomotor Data during Learning Video Lecture
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of Fluency Oriented Instruction on Motivation for Reading of Struggling Readers
Previous Article in Journal
Readiness, Roles, and Responsibilities of Stakeholders for Sustainable Mobile Learning Adoption in Higher Education
Previous Article in Special Issue
Assessing the Word Recognition Skills of German Elementary Students in Silent Reading—Psychometric Properties of an Item Pool to Generate Curriculum-Based Measurements
Open AccessReview

Fluency Interventions for Elementary Students with Reading Difficulties: A Synthesis of Research from 2000–2019

Department of Teaching, Learning, and Culture, Texas A & M University, 4232 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Educ. Sci. 2020, 10(3), 52; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10030052
Received: 15 January 2020 / Revised: 18 February 2020 / Accepted: 26 February 2020 / Published: 28 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Reading Fluency)
Oral reading fluency (ORF) deficits are a hallmark of reading difficulties. The impact of fluency struggles extends beyond word-level difficulties to include deficits in reading comprehension. Sixteen empirical studies conducted in 2000–2019 that examined ORF interventions among elementary students identified as having reading difficulties were reviewed to identify the characteristics (e.g., instructional variables, group size, type of interventionist) of effective ORF interventions and their impact on English oral reading fluency and reading comprehension outcomes. The systematic review revealed that interventions reported centered around repeated reading procedures (86.5%). Across the 16 studies, outcomes for oral reading fluency varied widely and most focused on speed and rate aspects rather than prosody. Effect sizes for rate and accuracy measures ranged from negligible to large (i.e., 0.01 to 1.18) and three studies found large effects for prosody outcomes. Effect sizes for reading comprehension ranged between non-significant and large significant effects. Findings support the use of repeated reading of text to build up ORF of students with reading difficulties. Interventions that were found to be most effective were those that were conducted one-on-one with a trained model of fluent word reading and accuracy. Findings also point to three gaps in our understanding: (1) the efficacy of interventions other than repeated reading, (2) effects of ORF interventions on prosody outcomes, and (3) sustainability of outcomes. View Full-Text
Keywords: interventions; oral reading fluency; reading comprehension; reading difficulties; systematic review interventions; oral reading fluency; reading comprehension; reading difficulties; systematic review
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Hudson, A.; Koh, P.W.; Moore, K.A.; Binks-Cantrell, E. Fluency Interventions for Elementary Students with Reading Difficulties: A Synthesis of Research from 2000–2019. Educ. Sci. 2020, 10, 52.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop