Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (52)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = nonchemical weed control

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
20 pages, 2970 KiB  
Review
The Rise of Eleusine indica as Brazil’s Most Troublesome Weed
by Ricardo Alcántara-de la Cruz, Laryssa Barbosa Xavier da Silva, Hudson K. Takano, Lucas Heringer Barcellos Júnior and Kassio Ferreira Mendes
Agronomy 2025, 15(8), 1759; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15081759 - 23 Jul 2025
Viewed by 569
Abstract
Goosegrass (Eleusine indica) is a major weed in Brazilian soybean, corn, and cotton systems, infesting over 60% of grain-producing areas and potentially reducing yields by more than 50%. Its competitiveness is due to its rapid emergence, fast tillering, C4 metabolism, and [...] Read more.
Goosegrass (Eleusine indica) is a major weed in Brazilian soybean, corn, and cotton systems, infesting over 60% of grain-producing areas and potentially reducing yields by more than 50%. Its competitiveness is due to its rapid emergence, fast tillering, C4 metabolism, and adaptability to various environmental conditions. A critical challenge relates to its widespread resistance to multiple herbicide modes of action, notably glyphosate and acetyl-CoA carboxylate (ACCase) inhibitors. Resistance mechanisms include 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS) target-site mutations, gene amplification, reduced translocation, glyphosate detoxification, and mainly ACCase target-site mutations. This literature review summarizes the current knowledge on herbicide resistance in goosegrass and its management in Brazil, with an emphasis on integrating chemical and non-chemical strategies. Mechanical and physical controls are effective in early or local infestations but must be combined with chemical methods for lasting control. Herbicides applied post-emergence of weeds, especially systemic ACCase inhibitors and glyphosate, remain important tools, although widespread resistance limits their effectiveness. Sequential applications and mixtures with contact herbicides such as glufosinate and protoporphyrinogen oxidase (PPO) inhibitors can improve control. Pre-emergence herbicides are effective when used before or immediately after planting, with adequate soil moisture being essential for their activation and effectiveness. Given the complexity of resistance mechanisms, chemical control alone is not enough. Integrated weed management programs, combining diverse herbicides, sequential treatments, and local resistance monitoring, are essential for sustainable goosegrass management. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Weed Science and Weed Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 4261 KiB  
Article
Influence of Mulching and Planting Density on Agronomic and Economic Traits of Melissa officinalis L.
by Stefan V. Gordanić, Dragoja Radanović, Miloš Rajković, Milan Lukić, Ana Dragumilo, Snežana Mrđan, Petar Batinić, Natalija Čutović, Sara Mikić, Željana Prijić and Tatjana Marković
Horticulturae 2025, 11(8), 866; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11080866 - 22 Jul 2025
Viewed by 394
Abstract
Melissa officinalis L. (Lamiaceae) is a perennial plant species widely used in the pharmaceutical and food industries, particularly valued for its sedative properties. This study investigates the impact of synthetic mulch film and planting density as two experimental factors on agronomic performance, raw [...] Read more.
Melissa officinalis L. (Lamiaceae) is a perennial plant species widely used in the pharmaceutical and food industries, particularly valued for its sedative properties. This study investigates the impact of synthetic mulch film and planting density as two experimental factors on agronomic performance, raw material quality, and economic efficiency in lemon balm production. The experiment was conducted at three locations in Serbia (L1: Bačko Novo Selo, L2: Bavanište, L3: Vilandrica) from 2022 to 2024, using two planting densities on synthetic mulch film (F1: 8.3 plants m−2; F2: 11.4 plants m−2) and a control treatment without mulch (C). The synthetic mulch film used was a synthetic black polypropylene film (Agritela Black, 90 g/m2), uniformly applied in strips across the cultivation area, covering approximately 78% of the soil surface. The results showed consistent increases in morphological parameters and yield across the years. Plant height in F1 and F2 treatments ranged from 65 to 75 cm, while in the control it reached up to 50 cm (2022–2024). Fresh biomass yield varied from 13.4 g per plant (C) to 378.08 g per plant (F2), and dry biomass yield from 60.3 g (C) to 125.4 g (F2). The highest essential oil content was observed in F2 (1.2% in 2022), while the control remained at 0.8%. The F2 treatment achieved complete weed suppression throughout the experiment without the use of herbicides, demonstrating both agronomic and ecological advantages. Economic evaluation revealed that F2 generated the highest cumulative profit (€142,164.5) compared to the control (€65,555.3). Despite higher initial investment, F2 had the most favorable cost–benefit ratio in the long term. This study highlights the crucial influence of mulching and planting density on optimizing lemon balm production across diverse climatic and soil conditions, while also underscoring the importance of sustainable, non-chemical weed management strategies in lemon balm cultivation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Conventional and Organic Weed Management in Horticultural Production)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 14425 KiB  
Review
Progress and Challenges in Research on Key Technologies for Laser Weed Control Robot-to-Target System
by Rui Lu, Daode Zhang, Siqi Wang and Xinyu Hu
Agronomy 2025, 15(5), 1015; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15051015 - 23 Apr 2025
Viewed by 1070
Abstract
The development of precise and sustainable agriculture has made non-chemical, highly selective laser weed control technology a hot research topic. The core of this technology lies in the overall performance of the targeting system, which consists of three key technologies, namely, target identification, [...] Read more.
The development of precise and sustainable agriculture has made non-chemical, highly selective laser weed control technology a hot research topic. The core of this technology lies in the overall performance of the targeting system, which consists of three key technologies, namely, target identification, dynamic positioning, and precise removal, which are interrelated and jointly determine the overall performance of the weed control system. In this paper, the key technologies of the targeting system are systematically analyzed to clarify the coupling relationship among the technologies and their role in performance optimization. This review systematically compares the mainstream recognition algorithms for the needs of laser weeding for specific parts, reveals the performance bottleneck of the existing algorithms in the laser weeding environment, and points out new research directions, such as developing weed apical growth zone recognition algorithms. The influence of laser beam control technology on weeding accuracy is analyzed, the advantages of vibroseis technology are explored, and the applicability problems of existing vibroseis technology in farmland environments are revealed, such as the shift of irradiation point caused by ground undulation. The key laws of laser parameter optimization are summarized, guiding the optimal design of the system. Through the systematic summary and in-depth analysis of the related research, this review reveals the key challenges facing the development of laser technology. It provides a prospective outlook on the future research direction, aiming to promote the development of laser weed control technology in terms of high efficiency, precision, and intelligence. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 2834 KiB  
Article
Watermelon Genotypes and Weed Response to Chicken Manure and Molasses-Induced Anaerobic Soil Disinfestation in High Tunnels
by Muhammad Sohaib Chattha, Brian K. Ward, Chandrasekar S. Kousik, Amnon Levi, Bhupinder S. Farmaha, Michael W. Marshall, William C. Bridges and Matthew A. Cutulle
Agronomy 2025, 15(3), 705; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15030705 - 14 Mar 2025
Viewed by 1168
Abstract
Weed and disease management in organic watermelon [Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai] production is challenging. Yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus L.) and Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats.) are two competitor weeds in watermelon plasticulture production systems. Anaerobic soil disinfestation [...] Read more.
Weed and disease management in organic watermelon [Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai] production is challenging. Yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus L.) and Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats.) are two competitor weeds in watermelon plasticulture production systems. Anaerobic soil disinfestation (ASD) is an emerging non-chemical approach to control weeds and soilborne plant pathogens, especially in organic farming. The effect of ASD treatments on weeds and soilborne diseases is being documented on different specialty crops. However, the impact of ASD treatments on the crop and crop genotypes; specifically watermelon has not been elucidated. Therefore, the impact of chicken manure and molasses (CMM)-induced ASD on twenty commercially available watermelon genotypes/rootstocks and major weed species was evaluated in a high tunnel experiment. The experiment was constructed as a randomized complete block design with three replications. The treatments consisted of a factorial of carbon source (1) non-treated check (CK), (2) CMM by twenty watermelon genotypes and rootstock. Soil treated with carbon CMM demonstrated significantly greater cumulative anaerobicity (246,963) activity relative to CK (575,372). Under anaerobic conditions, CMM achieved 91% weed control compared to CK. A lower number of yellow nutsedge (2) and Palmer amaranth (1) counts were recorded in CMM compared to CK (8) and (28), respectively. Among watermelon genotypes, ‘Extazy’, ‘Powerhouse’, ‘Sangria’, and ‘Exclamation’ had greater vigor 8.5, 8.4, 8.4, and 8.3, respectively, at 28 days after transplanting in CMM-treated soil. Greater watermelon plant fresh biomass was recorded in CMM-treated soil for ‘Extazy’ (434 g), ‘Powerhouse’ (409 g), ‘Exclamation’ (364 g), and ‘Sangria’ (360 g). This study demonstrated the variable response of watermelon genotypes to CMM-induced ASD and provides a guide for germplasm selection in organic watermelon production under field conditions. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 1407 KiB  
Article
How Does Herbicide Resistance Change Farmer’s Weed Management Decisions? Evidence from the Roundup Ready Experiment
by Huichun Sun, Terrance Hurley, George B. Frisvold, Katherine Dentzman, David Ervin, Wesley Everman, Jeffrey Gunsolus, Jason Norsworthy and Micheal Owen
Agronomy 2024, 14(11), 2720; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14112720 - 18 Nov 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1670
Abstract
Adoption of diverse weed management practices is viewed as essential for slowing the spread of herbicide-resistant (HR) weeds. Yet, adoption of diverse tactics has remained low, while there has been explosive growth of resistant weeds. This study analyzes U.S.-farm-level data to identify factors [...] Read more.
Adoption of diverse weed management practices is viewed as essential for slowing the spread of herbicide-resistant (HR) weeds. Yet, adoption of diverse tactics has remained low, while there has been explosive growth of resistant weeds. This study analyzes U.S.-farm-level data to identify factors affecting adoption of diverse weed management practices. This study uses directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) to consider how practice adoption is influenced by different causal pathways between farmer and farm characteristics and farmer awareness of and concern over HR weeds. This study then uses multiple regression analysis to estimate the direct and indirect pathways that influence practice adoption. Respondents relied more heavily on herbicide-based weed control methods than on mechanical or cultural methods. Concern over herbicide resistance increased the number of practices farmers adopted and the percentage of acres where farmers implemented these practices. Practice adoption was negatively associated with increasing levels of farmer risk aversion. Technological optimism—belief that new herbicides would soon be developed to counter HR weeds—discouraged diverse herbicide use practices that combat resistance, but encouraged use of some non-chemical weed control methods. Perceived weed dispersal externalities (from weed mobility) led to more diverse weed management, running counter to hypotheses that greater mobility reduces incentives for individual resistance management. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Weed Science and Weed Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 2474 KiB  
Article
Analysis of the Effects of Organic and Synthetic Mulching Films on the Weed, Root Yield, Essential Oil Yield, and Chemical Composition of Angelica archangelica L.
by Jovan Lazarević, Sava Vrbničanin, Ana Dragumilo, Tatjana Marković, Rada Đurović Pejčev, Svetlana Roljević Nikolić and Dragana Božić
Horticulturae 2024, 10(11), 1199; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10111199 - 14 Nov 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1260
Abstract
Angelica archangelica L. (Garden angelica) is a medicinal and aromatic plant from the Apiaceae family, originating from North Europe (Iceland, Greenland, and Scandinavian countries). A. archangelica is commonly used in traditional medicine to treat anxiety, insomnia, stomach and intestinal disorders, skin conditions, respiratory [...] Read more.
Angelica archangelica L. (Garden angelica) is a medicinal and aromatic plant from the Apiaceae family, originating from North Europe (Iceland, Greenland, and Scandinavian countries). A. archangelica is commonly used in traditional medicine to treat anxiety, insomnia, stomach and intestinal disorders, skin conditions, respiratory problems, and arthritis. This plant is generally cultivated for its root and seed where the essential oil (EO) is concentrated the most. Angelica archangelica cultivation has a lot of challenges but the main one is weed control; so, the aim of this study was to investigate the influence of four different mulch types as non-chemical weed control measures on weediness, fresh root yield, and EO chemical composition and yield from A. archangelica roots. A field trial was conducted with the following six treatments: two organic mulches, two synthetic mulches, and two controls (regular hand-weeded and weeded). The results show that the most present weeds were Ambrosia artemisiifolia, Chenopodium album, Polygonum aviculare, and Polygonum lapathyfolium, but synthetic mulch foils achieved the best weed suppression (100%). These fields also achieved the highest fresh root yield in both of the experimental seasons. The highest EO yield was detected with agrotextile mulch foil at season I (0.41%, v/w) and with the weeded control (0.51%, v/w) at season II, but dominant components at both seasons were α-pinene and β-phellandrene. The results suggest that the agrotextile black and silver–brown mulch foils achieved complete weed suppression, but the agrotextile black mulch foil had a better effect on fresh root yield, EO yield, and its chemical composition. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Medicinals, Herbs, and Specialty Crops)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 6214 KiB  
Article
Pots to Plots: Microshock Weed Control Is an Effective and Energy Efficient Option in the Field
by Daniel J. Bloomer, Kerry C. Harrington, Hossein Ghanizadeh and Trevor K. James
Sustainability 2024, 16(11), 4324; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114324 - 21 May 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1469
Abstract
Seeking low environmental impact alternatives to chemical herbicides that can be integrated into a regenerative agriculture system, we developed and tested flat-plate electrode weeding equipment applying ultra-low-energy electric shocks to seedlings in the field. Better than 90% control was achieved for all species, [...] Read more.
Seeking low environmental impact alternatives to chemical herbicides that can be integrated into a regenerative agriculture system, we developed and tested flat-plate electrode weeding equipment applying ultra-low-energy electric shocks to seedlings in the field. Better than 90% control was achieved for all species, with energy to treat 5 weeds m−2 equivalent to 15 kJ ha−1 for L. didymum and A. powellii, and 363 kJ ha−1 (leaf contact only) and 555kJ ha−1 (plants pressed to soil) for in-ground L. multiflorum, all well below our 1 MJ ha−1 target and a fraction of the energy required by any other weeding system. We compared applications to the leaves only or to leaves pressed against the soil surface, to seedlings growing outside in the ground and to plants growing in bags filled with the same soil. No previous studies have made such direct comparisons. Our research indicated that greenhouse and in-field results are comparable, other factors remaining constant. The in-ground, outdoor treatments were as effective and efficient as our previously published in-bag, greenhouse trials. The flat-plate system tested supports sustainable farming by providing ultra-low-energy weed control suitable for manual, robotic, or conventional deployment without recourse to tillage or chemical herbicides. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainable Agriculture)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 622 KiB  
Review
Nonchemical Aquatic Weed Control Methods: Exploring the Efficacy of UV-C Radiation as a Novel Weed Control Tool
by Dian Udugamasuriyage, Gayan Kahandawa and Kushan U. Tennakoon
Plants 2024, 13(8), 1052; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13081052 - 9 Apr 2024
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2426
Abstract
Aquatic weeds, including invasive species, are a worldwide problem. The presence of aquatic weeds poses several critical issues, such as hindering the continuous flow of water in irrigation channels and preventing the proper distribution of adequate water quantities. Therefore, effective control measures are [...] Read more.
Aquatic weeds, including invasive species, are a worldwide problem. The presence of aquatic weeds poses several critical issues, such as hindering the continuous flow of water in irrigation channels and preventing the proper distribution of adequate water quantities. Therefore, effective control measures are vital for agriculture and numerous downstream industries. Numerous methods for controlling aquatic weeds have emerged over time, with herbicide application being a widely used established method of weed management, although it imposes significant environmental risks. Therefore, it is important to explore nonchemical alternative methods to control existing and emerging aquatic weeds, potentially posing fewer environmental hazards compared with conventional chemical methods. In this review, we focus on nonchemical methods, encompassing mechanical, physical, biological, and other alternative approaches. We primarily evaluated the different nonchemical control methods discussed in this review based on two main criteria: (1) efficiency in alleviating aquatic weed problems in location-specified scenarios and (2) impacts on the environment, as well as potential health and safety risks. We compared the nonchemical treatments with the UV-C-radiation-mediated aquatic weed control method, which is considered a potential novel technique. Since there is limited published literature available on the application of UV-C radiation used exclusively for aquatic weed control, our review is based on previous reports of UV-C radiation used to successfully control terrestrial weeds and algal populations. In order to compare the mechanisms involved with nonchemical weed control methods, we reviewed respective pathways leading to plant cell death, plant growth inhibition, and diminishing reemergence to justify the potential use of UV-C treatment in aquatic habitats as a viable novel source for aquatic weed control. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioherbicide Development for Weed Control II)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 230 KiB  
Review
Emerging Perspectives on Non-Chemical Weed Management Tactics in Container Ornamental Production in the United States
by Greeshmanth Alluri and Debalina Saha
Horticulturae 2024, 10(3), 281; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10030281 - 15 Mar 2024
Viewed by 2361
Abstract
Weeds are undesirable plants that can interfere with human activities and can hamper crop production and practices. The competition among ornamentals and weeds for space, nutrition, light, and moisture within a restricted area, such as in container production, can be intense and destructive. [...] Read more.
Weeds are undesirable plants that can interfere with human activities and can hamper crop production and practices. The competition among ornamentals and weeds for space, nutrition, light, and moisture within a restricted area, such as in container production, can be intense and destructive. In response to increasing concerns regarding herbicide injuries and the effects of pesticide use on the environment, many growers are extremely interested in non-chemical pest-management approaches. There are various non-chemical strategies to control weeds in containers, which include scouting, sanitation practices, hand weeding, mulching, irrigation management, substrate stratification, mulch discs or geo discs, lid bags, and fertilizer placement. In a restricted growth environment, weeds have been shown to reduce crop growth significantly. Limited information is available on the effects of weed densities and container sizes on ornament–weed competition within containerized production and how the concepts of fertilizer placement can be used efficiently to control weeds in containers without using any herbicides on the ornamentals. There is an immediate need to evaluate the interference and competitive effects of pernicious weed species in container-grown ornamentals in the North Central United States and to develop effective non-chemical weed control strategies by altering fertilizer placement in container production. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Floriculture, Nursery and Landscape, and Turf)
18 pages, 3754 KiB  
Article
Comparative Analysis of the Performance of a Chain Mower and Tools That Perform Under-Row Weed Control with Tillage in the Vineyard
by Lorenzo Gagliardi, Sofia Matilde Luglio, Andrea Peruzzi, Marco Fontanelli, Christian Frasconi and Michele Raffaelli
Agronomy 2024, 14(1), 206; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14010206 - 17 Jan 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1757
Abstract
In the Mediterranean area, vineyard soils are often characterized by a high stone content. In these contexts, where tools commonly adopted for under-row weed control are frequently damaged, the utilization of a chain mower could be a preferable alternative. This research aims to [...] Read more.
In the Mediterranean area, vineyard soils are often characterized by a high stone content. In these contexts, where tools commonly adopted for under-row weed control are frequently damaged, the utilization of a chain mower could be a preferable alternative. This research aims to compare a modified mower with chains with other tools commonly employed that control weeds through tillage, such as motorized discs, blade weeder, and rotary star hoe. Weed control effectiveness, effects on weed flora composition, soil compaction, and operative efficiencies were evaluated. The chain mower allowed us to obtain encouraging results of weed biomass reduction (55.4 and 25.4%, between and around vine trunks, respectively), weed height reduction (35.9%), and weed cover reduction (79.2%), comparable to the other tools. All the tools showed a lower weed control efficacy around vine trunks rather than between them (weed biomass reductions of 24.8% and 52.6%, respectively). Results regarding the effect on weed flora composition seem to confirm this trend. Despite the higher chain mower field time (3.78 h ha−1) and fuel consumption (24.24 kg ha−1) compared to the blade weeder and the rotary star hoe, its versatility in stony soil and its lower impact on soil (soil penetration resistances of 1602.42 and 2262.83 kPa in 2022 and 2023, respectively) compared to the other tools make it a potentially advantageous implement for under-row weed management in vineyards. Further studies could be useful to improve chain mower performance, particularly around vine trunks, by evaluating in different planting layouts different dimensions of both the cutting element and feeler, which allows the vine-skipping mechanism. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 3667 KiB  
Article
Microwave Control of Reynoutria japonica Houtt., Including Ecotoxicological Aspects and the Resveratrol Content in Rhizomes
by Krzysztof Słowiński, Beata Grygierzec, Agnieszka Baran, Sylwester Tabor, Diletta Piatti, Filippo Maggi and Agnieszka Synowiec
Plants 2024, 13(2), 152; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13020152 - 5 Jan 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2071
Abstract
Japanese knotweed (Reynoutria japonica Houtt.) is Poland’s invasive weed, for which there is no efficient control method. The rhizomes of this species are rich in resveratrol. In this work, we evaluated (1) the effectiveness of electromagnetic microwaves (MV) in destroying Japanese knotweed [...] Read more.
Japanese knotweed (Reynoutria japonica Houtt.) is Poland’s invasive weed, for which there is no efficient control method. The rhizomes of this species are rich in resveratrol. In this work, we evaluated (1) the effectiveness of electromagnetic microwaves (MV) in destroying Japanese knotweed using an original device, HOGWEED (MV of 2450 MHz), (2) the ecotoxic effect of the MV on the soil environment, and (3) the resveratrol content in knotweed rhizomes after MV treatment. The field studies were carried out in 2022 in southern Poland. Cut plants were MV-treated for times of 5.0–25.0 min. The MV efficiency was checked 10 and 56 days after treatment (DAT). After MV treatment, fresh soil samples were taken to analyze their ecotoxicity. As a result, at 56 DAT, knotweed was controlled if MV was used for at least 20.0 min. The MV did not affect the soil ecotoxicity. The MV-treated soils were classified as non-toxic or low-toxic. To analyze the resveratrol content, healthy knotweed rhizomes were dug out, treated with MV in the laboratory at 2.5–10.0 min, and analyzed for resveratrol content in HPLC-MS/MS. As a result, the resveratrol in the rhizomes significantly decreased in a time-dependent manner following MV exposure. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 3800 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of Sustainable Strategies for Mechanical Under-Row Weed Control in the Vineyard
by Lorenzo Gagliardi, Marco Fontanelli, Sofia Matilde Luglio, Christian Frasconi, Andrea Peruzzi and Michele Raffaelli
Agronomy 2023, 13(12), 3005; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13123005 - 7 Dec 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2198
Abstract
Mechanical under-row weed control in the vineyard emerges as a sustainable choice compared to chemical control, with tillage-based approaches proving especially efficient. A rollhacke, finger weeder, and blade weeder are valid alternatives to commonly used implements that cause excessive soil disruption and display [...] Read more.
Mechanical under-row weed control in the vineyard emerges as a sustainable choice compared to chemical control, with tillage-based approaches proving especially efficient. A rollhacke, finger weeder, and blade weeder are valid alternatives to commonly used implements that cause excessive soil disruption and display suboptimal efficiency. The trial aimed to compare different under-row weed control strategies in terms of weed control efficacy and operational performance. Among these, in ST1, a tool-holder equipped with both a rollhacke and finger weeder was used at the first and second intervention; in ST2, a rollhacke was used at the first intervention and blade weeder at the second one; in ST3, firstly the tool-holder equipped with a rollhacke and finger weeder was used, then the blade weeder; in ST4, a rollhacke was used first and then the tool-holder equipped with a rollhacke and finger weeder. Weed height, weed cover, and weed biomass were evaluated before the first and after the second intervention. Total field time, fuel consumption, and CO2 emissions of each strategy were assessed. ST1 proved to be the best compromise in terms of weed control effectiveness and operational performance compared to the other strategies. Indeed, ST1 tendentially achieved a lower weed height (20.42 cm) and weed biomass around vine trunks (105.33 g d.m. m−2) compared to the other strategies. In terms of total field time, fuel consumption and CO2 emissions, ST1 recorded intermediate values equal to 3.85 h ha−1, 15.29 kg ha−1, and 48.72 kg ha−1, respectively. Further studies are needed to evaluate these strategies in different vineyard conditions, considering their effect on weed flora composition. Furthermore, exploring automation technology for real-time implement adjustments based on weed infestation levels could further improve the intervention effectiveness and efficiency. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 3981 KiB  
Article
Transformer in UAV Image-Based Weed Mapping
by Jiangsan Zhao, Therese With Berge and Jakob Geipel
Remote Sens. 2023, 15(21), 5165; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15215165 - 29 Oct 2023
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2882
Abstract
Weeds affect crop yield and quality due to competition for resources. In order to reduce the risk of yield losses due to weeds, herbicides or non-chemical measures are applied. Weeds, especially creeping perennial species, are generally distributed in patches within arable fields. Hence, [...] Read more.
Weeds affect crop yield and quality due to competition for resources. In order to reduce the risk of yield losses due to weeds, herbicides or non-chemical measures are applied. Weeds, especially creeping perennial species, are generally distributed in patches within arable fields. Hence, instead of applying control measures uniformly, precision weeding or site-specific weed management (SSWM) is highly recommended. Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imaging is known for wide area coverage and flexible operation frequency, making it a potential solution to generate weed maps at a reasonable cost. Efficient weed mapping algorithms need to be developed together with UAV imagery to facilitate SSWM. Different machine learning (ML) approaches have been developed for image-based weed mapping, either classical ML models or the more up-to-date deep learning (DL) models taking full advantage of parallel computation on a GPU (graphics processing unit). Attention-based transformer DL models, which have seen a recent boom, are expected to overtake classical convolutional neural network (CNN) DL models. This inspired us to develop a transformer DL model for segmenting weeds, cereal crops, and ‘other’ in low-resolution RGB UAV imagery (about 33 mm ground sampling distance, g.s.d.) captured after the cereal crop had turned yellow. Images were acquired during three years in 15 fields with three cereal species (Triticum aestivum, Hordeum vulgare, and Avena sativa) and various weed flora dominated by creeping perennials (mainly Cirsium arvense and Elymus repens). The performance of our transformer model, 1Dtransformer, was evaluated through comparison with a classical DL model, 1DCNN, and two classical ML methods, i.e., random forest (RF) and k-nearest neighbor (KNN). The transformer model showed the best performance with an overall accuracy of 98.694% on pixels set aside for validation. It also agreed best and relatively well with ground reference data on total weed coverage, R2 = 0.598. In this study, we showed the outstanding performance and robustness of a 1Dtransformer model for weed mapping based on UAV imagery for the first time. The model can be used to obtain weed maps in cereals fields known to be infested by perennial weeds. These maps can be used as basis for the generation of prescription maps for SSWM, either pre-harvest, post-harvest, or in the next crop, by applying herbicides or non-chemical measures. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 4902 KiB  
Article
The Electric Spatula: Killing Weeds with Pulsed Microshocks from a Flat-Plate Electrode
by Daniel J. Bloomer, Kerry C. Harrington, Hossein Ghanizadeh and Trevor K. James
Agronomy 2023, 13(11), 2694; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13112694 - 26 Oct 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2422
Abstract
Seeking an easy-to-deploy, energy-efficient, non-herbicide weed control method, we tested a flat-plate electrode to apply pulsed electric microshocks (PMS) to a grass and four broadleaf weed species. The method can be deployed via a hand-held unit or as part of a fully automated [...] Read more.
Seeking an easy-to-deploy, energy-efficient, non-herbicide weed control method, we tested a flat-plate electrode to apply pulsed electric microshocks (PMS) to a grass and four broadleaf weed species. The method can be deployed via a hand-held unit or as part of a fully automated system to control escape weeds in field crops. The effectiveness of the treatments and the relative energy discharges when applying similar electric doses to the plant leaves or to the plant when pressed to the soil with a flat-plate electrode were compared. The method killed only half of the treated Lolium multiflorum “Winter Star” plants, well below our target rate, but significantly reduced growth rates and indicated that effective treatment of <1.0 MJ ha−1 for treating five plants m−2 is possible. Polygonum aviculare L., Amaranthus powellii S. Wats., Amaranthus deflexus, and Solanum nitidibaccatum Bitter plants were successfully controlled, with the energy required to kill 100% of seedlings varying from 0.1 to 0.9 MJ ha−1, indicating that broadleaf weeds are more susceptible. This easily met our target effectiveness and efficiency goals. The discharged energy increased when the electrode pressed the plant to a dry soil surface rather than to the leaves only and increased further when the electrode pressed the plant to a wet soil surface. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 7988 KiB  
Article
Herbicide Resistance in Summer Annual Weeds of Australia’s Northern Grains Region
by John C. Broster, Adam Jalaludin, Michael J. Widderick, Allison J. Chambers and Michael J. Walsh
Agronomy 2023, 13(7), 1862; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13071862 - 14 Jul 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 1962
Abstract
For more than two decades, glyphosate has been relied on to control summer annual weeds in fallow systems in Australia’s northern grains region. With numerous cases of glyphosate resistance reported in weed species collected from this region, there are concerns about the future [...] Read more.
For more than two decades, glyphosate has been relied on to control summer annual weeds in fallow systems in Australia’s northern grains region. With numerous cases of glyphosate resistance reported in weed species collected from this region, there are concerns about the future viability of this herbicide. A random seed collection survey of summer weeds was conducted between 2016 and 2018 with the aim of determining the frequency and distribution of resistance to glyphosate and other herbicides commonly used for summer weed control. Glyphosate resistance was ubiquitous in fleabane, with all collected populations resistant to this herbicide. Glyphosate resistance was also prevalent in feathertop Rhodes grass, windmill grass, and awnless barnyard grass, with resistance detected in 68%, 58%, and 36% of populations, respectively. Only 14% of sowthistle populations collected between 2013 and 2108 were resistant to glyphosate. Resistance to haloxyfop was detected in feathertop Rhodes grass, albeit at a low frequency (2%). Other herbicides, such as 2,4-D amine, propaquizafop, and clethodim, provided good control of the broadleaf and grass weeds tested. The results from these surveys conducted between 2013 and 2017 provide a first glimpse of the state of herbicide resistance in key crop weeds for Queensland and the northern region of New South Wales. It is clear that farmers and agronomists need to consider incorporating non-chemical weed management tactics to promote the sustainability of current herbicides. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Herbicides and Chemical Control of Weeds)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop