Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (14)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = mRNA polyadenylation machinery

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
16 pages, 2039 KiB  
Article
Punishment-Induced Suppression of Methamphetamine Self-Administration Is Accompanied by the Activation of the CPEB4/GLD2 Polyadenylation Complex of the Translational Machinery
by Atul P. Daiwile, Bruce Ladenheim, Subramaniam Jayanthi and Jean Lud Cadet
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(6), 2734; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26062734 - 18 Mar 2025
Viewed by 581
Abstract
Methamphetamine (METH) use disorder (MUD) is a public health catastrophe. Herein, we used a METH self-administration model to assess behavioral responses to the dopamine receptor D1 (DRD1) antagonist, SCH23390. Differential gene expression was measured in the dorsal striatum after a 30-day withdrawal from [...] Read more.
Methamphetamine (METH) use disorder (MUD) is a public health catastrophe. Herein, we used a METH self-administration model to assess behavioral responses to the dopamine receptor D1 (DRD1) antagonist, SCH23390. Differential gene expression was measured in the dorsal striatum after a 30-day withdrawal from METH. SCH23390 administration reduced METH taking in all animals. Shock Resistant (SR) rats showed greater incubation of METH seeking, which was correlated with increased Creb1, Cbp, and JunD mRNA expression. Cytoplasmic polyadenylation element binding protein 4 (Cpeb4) mRNA levels were increased in shock-sensitive (SS) rats. SS rats also showed increased protein levels for cleavage and polyadenylation specificity factor (CPSF) and germ line development 2 (GLD2) that are CPEB4-interacting proteins. Interestingly, GLD2-regulated GLUN2A mRNA and its protein showed increased expression in the shock-sensitive rats. Taken together, these observations identified CPEB4-regulated molecular mechanisms acting via NMDA GLUN2A receptors as potential targets for the treatment of METH use disorder. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Neurobiology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 2092 KiB  
Review
HPV and RNA Binding Proteins: What We Know and What Remains to Be Discovered
by Sheila V. Graham
Viruses 2024, 16(5), 783; https://doi.org/10.3390/v16050783 - 15 May 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2622
Abstract
Papillomavirus gene regulation is largely post-transcriptional due to overlapping open reading frames and the use of alternative polyadenylation and alternative splicing to produce the full suite of viral mRNAs. These processes are controlled by a wide range of cellular RNA binding proteins (RPBs), [...] Read more.
Papillomavirus gene regulation is largely post-transcriptional due to overlapping open reading frames and the use of alternative polyadenylation and alternative splicing to produce the full suite of viral mRNAs. These processes are controlled by a wide range of cellular RNA binding proteins (RPBs), including constitutive splicing factors and cleavage and polyadenylation machinery, but also factors that regulate these processes, for example, SR and hnRNP proteins. Like cellular RNAs, papillomavirus RNAs have been shown to bind many such proteins. The life cycle of papillomaviruses is intimately linked to differentiation of the epithelial tissues the virus infects. For example, viral late mRNAs and proteins are expressed only in the most differentiated epithelial layers to avoid recognition by the host immune response. Papillomavirus genome replication is linked to the DNA damage response and viral chromatin conformation, processes which also link to RNA processing. Challenges with respect to elucidating how RBPs regulate the viral life cycle include consideration of the orchestrated spatial aspect of viral gene expression in an infected epithelium and the epigenetic nature of the viral episomal genome. This review discusses RBPs that control viral gene expression, and how the connectivity of various nuclear processes might contribute to viral mRNA production. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Regulation of the Virus Lifecycle by Cellular RNA-Binding Proteins)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 802 KiB  
Opinion
The Dynamic Poly(A) Tail Acts as a Signal Hub in mRNA Metabolism
by Guiying Zhang, Haolin Luo, Xinyi Li, Zhangli Hu and Quan Wang
Cells 2023, 12(4), 572; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12040572 - 10 Feb 2023
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 4102
Abstract
In eukaryotes, mRNA metabolism requires a sophisticated signaling system. Recent studies have suggested that polyadenylate tail may play a vital role in such a system. The poly(A) tail used to be regarded as a common modification at the 3′ end of mRNA, but [...] Read more.
In eukaryotes, mRNA metabolism requires a sophisticated signaling system. Recent studies have suggested that polyadenylate tail may play a vital role in such a system. The poly(A) tail used to be regarded as a common modification at the 3′ end of mRNA, but it is now known to be more than just that. It appears to act as a platform or hub that can be understood in two ways. On the one hand, polyadenylation and deadenylation machinery constantly regulates its dynamic activity; on the other hand, it exhibits the ability to recruit RNA-binding proteins and then interact with diverse factors to send various signals to regulate mRNA metabolism. In this paper, we outline the main complexes that regulate the dynamic activities of poly(A) tails, explain how these complexes participate polyadenylation/deadenylation process and summarize the diverse signals this hub emit. We are trying to make a point that the poly(A) tail can metaphorically act as a “flagman” who is supervised by polyadenylation and deadenylation and sends out signals to regulate the orderly functioning of mRNA metabolism. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Cell Signaling Pathways)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 4760 KiB  
Review
Molecular Insights into mRNA Polyadenylation and Deadenylation
by Junjie Liu, Xubing Lu, Siyu Zhang, Ling Yuan and Yadong Sun
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(19), 10985; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231910985 - 20 Sep 2022
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 8645
Abstract
Poly(A) tails are present on almost all eukaryotic mRNAs, and play critical roles in mRNA stability, nuclear export, and translation efficiency. The biosynthesis and shortening of a poly(A) tail are regulated by large multiprotein complexes. However, the molecular mechanisms of these protein machineries [...] Read more.
Poly(A) tails are present on almost all eukaryotic mRNAs, and play critical roles in mRNA stability, nuclear export, and translation efficiency. The biosynthesis and shortening of a poly(A) tail are regulated by large multiprotein complexes. However, the molecular mechanisms of these protein machineries still remain unclear. Recent studies regarding the structural and biochemical characteristics of those protein complexes have shed light on the potential mechanisms of polyadenylation and deadenylation. This review summarizes the recent structural studies on pre-mRNA 3′-end processing complexes that initiate the polyadenylation and discusses the similarities and differences between yeast and human machineries. Specifically, we highlight recent biochemical efforts in the reconstitution of the active human canonical pre-mRNA 3′-end processing systems, as well as the roles of RBBP6/Mpe1 in activating the entire machinery. We also describe how poly(A) tails are removed by the PAN2-PAN3 and CCR4-NOT deadenylation complexes and discuss the emerging role of the cytoplasmic poly(A)-binding protein (PABPC) in promoting deadenylation. Together, these recent discoveries show that the dynamic features of these machineries play important roles in regulating polyadenylation and deadenylation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue RNA-Binding Proteins — Structure, Function, Networks and Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

28 pages, 2971 KiB  
Review
Translation of Plant RNA Viruses
by Guowei Geng, Deya Wang, Zhifei Liu, Yalan Wang, Mingjing Zhu, Xinran Cao, Chengming Yu and Xuefeng Yuan
Viruses 2021, 13(12), 2499; https://doi.org/10.3390/v13122499 - 13 Dec 2021
Cited by 18 | Viewed by 5435
Abstract
Plant RNA viruses encode essential viral proteins that depend on the host translation machinery for their expression. However, genomic RNAs of most plant RNA viruses lack the classical characteristics of eukaryotic cellular mRNAs, such as mono-cistron, 5′ cap structure, and 3′ polyadenylation. To [...] Read more.
Plant RNA viruses encode essential viral proteins that depend on the host translation machinery for their expression. However, genomic RNAs of most plant RNA viruses lack the classical characteristics of eukaryotic cellular mRNAs, such as mono-cistron, 5′ cap structure, and 3′ polyadenylation. To adapt and utilize the eukaryotic translation machinery, plant RNA viruses have evolved a variety of translation strategies such as cap-independent translation, translation recoding on initiation and termination sites, and post-translation processes. This review focuses on advances in cap-independent translation and translation recoding in plant viruses. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Viruses of Plants, Fungi and Protozoa)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 1558 KiB  
Review
The Cap-Binding Complex CBC and the Eukaryotic Translation Factor eIF4E: Co-Conspirators in Cap-Dependent RNA Maturation and Translation
by Jean-Clement Mars, Mehdi Ghram, Biljana Culjkovic-Kraljacic and Katherine L. B. Borden
Cancers 2021, 13(24), 6185; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13246185 - 8 Dec 2021
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 5703
Abstract
The translation of RNA into protein is a dynamic process which is heavily regulated during normal cell physiology and can be dysregulated in human malignancies. Its dysregulation can impact selected groups of RNAs, modifying protein levels independently of transcription. Integral to their suitability [...] Read more.
The translation of RNA into protein is a dynamic process which is heavily regulated during normal cell physiology and can be dysregulated in human malignancies. Its dysregulation can impact selected groups of RNAs, modifying protein levels independently of transcription. Integral to their suitability for translation, RNAs undergo a series of maturation steps including the addition of the m7G cap on the 5′ end of RNAs, splicing, as well as cleavage and polyadenylation (CPA). Importantly, each of these steps can be coopted to modify the transcript signal. Factors that bind the m7G cap escort these RNAs through different steps of maturation and thus govern the physical nature of the final transcript product presented to the translation machinery. Here, we describe these steps and how the major m7G cap-binding factors in mammalian cells, the cap binding complex (CBC) and the eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF4E, are positioned to chaperone transcripts through RNA maturation, nuclear export, and translation in a transcript-specific manner. To conceptualize a framework for the flow and integration of this genetic information, we discuss RNA maturation models and how these integrate with translation. Finally, we discuss how these processes can be coopted by cancer cells and means to target these in malignancy. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 962 KiB  
Review
Dynamic Variations of 3′UTR Length Reprogram the mRNA Regulatory Landscape
by Estanislao Navarro, Adrián Mallén and Miguel Hueso
Biomedicines 2021, 9(11), 1560; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9111560 - 28 Oct 2021
Cited by 37 | Viewed by 8053
Abstract
This paper concerns 3′-untranslated regions (3′UTRs) of mRNAs, which are non-coding regulatory platforms that control stability, fate and the correct spatiotemporal translation of mRNAs. Many mRNAs have polymorphic 3′UTR regions. Controlling 3′UTR length and sequence facilitates the regulation of the accessibility of functional [...] Read more.
This paper concerns 3′-untranslated regions (3′UTRs) of mRNAs, which are non-coding regulatory platforms that control stability, fate and the correct spatiotemporal translation of mRNAs. Many mRNAs have polymorphic 3′UTR regions. Controlling 3′UTR length and sequence facilitates the regulation of the accessibility of functional effectors (RNA binding proteins, miRNAs or other ncRNAs) to 3′UTR functional boxes and motifs and the establishment of different regulatory landscapes for mRNA function. In this context, shortening of 3′UTRs would loosen miRNA or protein-based mechanisms of mRNA degradation, while 3′UTR lengthening would strengthen accessibility to these effectors. Alterations in the mechanisms regulating 3′UTR length would result in widespread deregulation of gene expression that could eventually lead to diseases likely linked to the loss (or acquisition) of specific miRNA binding sites. Here, we will review the mechanisms that control 3′UTR length dynamics and their alterations in human disorders. We will discuss, from a mechanistic point of view centered on the molecular machineries involved, the generation of 3′UTR variability by the use of alternative polyadenylation and cleavage sites, of mutually exclusive terminal alternative exons (exon skipping) as well as by the process of exonization of Alu cassettes to generate new 3′UTRs with differential functional features. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue mRNA Metabolism in Health and Disease)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 3411 KiB  
Review
Role of PUM RNA-Binding Proteins in Cancer
by Maciej J. Smialek, Erkut Ilaslan, Marcin P. Sajek and Jadwiga Jaruzelska
Cancers 2021, 13(1), 129; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13010129 - 3 Jan 2021
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 5294
Abstract
Until recently, post-transcriptional gene regulation (PTGR), in contrast to transcriptional regulation, was not extensively explored in cancer, even though it seems to be highly important. PUM proteins are well described in the PTGR of several organisms and contain the PUF RNA-binding domain that [...] Read more.
Until recently, post-transcriptional gene regulation (PTGR), in contrast to transcriptional regulation, was not extensively explored in cancer, even though it seems to be highly important. PUM proteins are well described in the PTGR of several organisms and contain the PUF RNA-binding domain that recognizes the UGUANAUA motif, located mostly in the 3′ untranslated region (3′UTR) of target mRNAs. Depending on the protein cofactors recruited by PUM proteins, target mRNAs are directed towards translation, repression, activation, degradation, or specific localization. Abnormal profiles of PUM expression have been shown in several types of cancer, in some of them being different for PUM1 and PUM2. This review summarizes the dysregulation of PUM1 and PUM2 expression in several cancer tissues. It also describes the regulatory mechanisms behind the activity of PUMs, including cooperation with microRNA and non-coding RNA machineries, as well as the alternative polyadenylation pathway. It also emphasizes the importance of future studies to gain a more complete picture of the role of PUM proteins in different types of cancer. Such studies may result in identification of novel targets for future cancer therapies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Cancer Biology)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

29 pages, 2287 KiB  
Review
Role of Viral Ribonucleoproteins in Human Papillomavirus Type 16 Gene Expression
by Naoko Kajitani and Stefan Schwartz
Viruses 2020, 12(10), 1110; https://doi.org/10.3390/v12101110 - 30 Sep 2020
Cited by 17 | Viewed by 5061
Abstract
Human papillomaviruses (HPVs) depend on the cellular RNA-processing machineries including alternative RNA splicing and polyadenylation to coordinate HPV gene expression. HPV RNA processing is controlled by cis-regulatory RNA elements and trans-regulatory factors since the HPV splice sites are suboptimal. The definition of HPV [...] Read more.
Human papillomaviruses (HPVs) depend on the cellular RNA-processing machineries including alternative RNA splicing and polyadenylation to coordinate HPV gene expression. HPV RNA processing is controlled by cis-regulatory RNA elements and trans-regulatory factors since the HPV splice sites are suboptimal. The definition of HPV exons and introns may differ between individual HPV mRNA species and is complicated by the fact that many HPV protein-coding sequences overlap. The formation of HPV ribonucleoproteins consisting of HPV pre-mRNAs and multiple cellular RNA-binding proteins may result in the different outcomes of HPV gene expression, which contributes to the HPV life cycle progression and HPV-associated cancer development. In this review, we summarize the regulation of HPV16 gene expression at the level of RNA processing with focus on the interactions between HPV16 pre-mRNAs and cellular RNA-binding factors. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Function and Structure of Viral Ribonucleoproteins Complexes)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 2483 KiB  
Article
Alternative Polyadenylation and Salicylic Acid Modulate Root Responses to Low Nitrogen Availability
by Carlos M. Conesa, Angela Saez, Sara Navarro-Neila, Laura de Lorenzo, Arthur G. Hunt, Edgar B. Sepúlveda, Roberto Baigorri, Jose M. Garcia-Mina, Angel M. Zamarreño, Soledad Sacristán and Juan C. del Pozo
Plants 2020, 9(2), 251; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9020251 - 16 Feb 2020
Cited by 36 | Viewed by 4633
Abstract
Nitrogen (N) is probably the most important macronutrient and its scarcity limits plant growth, development and fitness. N starvation response has been largely studied by transcriptomic analyses, but little is known about the role of alternative polyadenylation (APA) in such response. In this [...] Read more.
Nitrogen (N) is probably the most important macronutrient and its scarcity limits plant growth, development and fitness. N starvation response has been largely studied by transcriptomic analyses, but little is known about the role of alternative polyadenylation (APA) in such response. In this work, we show that N starvation modifies poly(A) usage in a large number of transcripts, some of them mediated by FIP1, a component of the polyadenylation machinery. Interestingly, the number of mRNAs isoforms with poly(A) tags located in protein-coding regions or 5′-UTRs significantly increases in response to N starvation. The set of genes affected by APA in response to N deficiency is enriched in N-metabolism, oxidation-reduction processes, response to stresses, and hormone responses, among others. A hormone profile analysis shows that the levels of salicylic acid (SA), a phytohormone that reduces nitrate accumulation and root growth, increase significantly upon N starvation. Meta-analyses of APA-affected and fip1-2-deregulated genes indicate a connection between the nitrogen starvation response and salicylic acid (SA) signaling. Genetic analyses show that SA may be important for preventing the overgrowth of the root system in low N environments. This work provides new insights on how plants interconnect different pathways, such as defense-related hormonal signaling and the regulation of genomic information by APA, to fine-tune the response to low N availability. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 4359 KiB  
Article
CPEB2 Is Necessary for Proper Porcine Meiotic Maturation and Embryonic Development
by Barbora Prochazkova, Pavla Komrskova and Michal Kubelka
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19(10), 3138; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19103138 - 12 Oct 2018
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 3652
Abstract
Oocyte meiotic maturation and embryogenesis are some of the most important physiological processes that occur in organisms, playing crucial roles in the preservation of life in all species. The post-transcriptional regulation of maternal messenger ribonucleic acids (mRNAs) and the post-translational regulation of proteins [...] Read more.
Oocyte meiotic maturation and embryogenesis are some of the most important physiological processes that occur in organisms, playing crucial roles in the preservation of life in all species. The post-transcriptional regulation of maternal messenger ribonucleic acids (mRNAs) and the post-translational regulation of proteins are critical in the control of oocyte maturation and early embryogenesis. Translational control affects the basic mechanism of protein synthesis, thus, knowledge of the key components included in this machinery is required in order to understand its regulation. Cytoplasmic polyadenylation element binding proteins (CPEBs) bind to the 3′-end of mRNAs to regulate their localization and translation and are necessary for proper development. In this study we examined the expression pattern of cytoplasmic polyadenylation element binding protein 2 (CPEB2) both on the mRNA (by real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, qRT-PCR) and protein (by Western blotting, WB) level, as well as its localization during the meiotic maturation of porcine oocytes and early embryonic development by immunocytochemistry (ICC). For the elucidation of its functions, CPEB2 knockdown by double-strand RNA (dsRNA) was used. We discovered that CPEB2 is expressed during all stages of porcine meiotic maturation and embryonic development. Moreover, we found that it is necessary to enable a high percentage of oocytes to reach the metaphase II (MII) stage, as well as for the production of good-quality parthenogenetic blastocysts. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Translational Control)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 2217 KiB  
Review
Role of the DNA Damage Response in Human Papillomavirus RNA Splicing and Polyadenylation
by Kersti Nilsson, Chengjun Wu and Stefan Schwartz
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19(6), 1735; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19061735 - 12 Jun 2018
Cited by 18 | Viewed by 6241
Abstract
Human papillomaviruses (HPVs) have evolved to use the DNA repair machinery to replicate its DNA genome in differentiated cells. HPV activates the DNA damage response (DDR) in infected cells. Cellular DDR factors are recruited to the HPV DNA genome and position the cellular [...] Read more.
Human papillomaviruses (HPVs) have evolved to use the DNA repair machinery to replicate its DNA genome in differentiated cells. HPV activates the DNA damage response (DDR) in infected cells. Cellular DDR factors are recruited to the HPV DNA genome and position the cellular DNA polymerase on the HPV DNA and progeny genomes are synthesized. Following HPV DNA replication, HPV late gene expression is activated. Recent research has shown that the DDR factors also interact with RNA binding proteins and affects RNA processing. DDR factors activated by DNA damage and that associate with HPV DNA can recruit splicing factors and RNA binding proteins to the HPV DNA and induce HPV late gene expression. This induction is the result of altered alternative polyadenylation and splicing of HPV messenger RNA (mRNA). HPV uses the DDR machinery to replicate its DNA genome and to activate HPV late gene expression at the level of RNA processing. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Human Polyomaviruses and Papillomaviruses)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

22 pages, 13598 KiB  
Review
Nuclear Export of Messenger RNA
by Jun Katahira
Genes 2015, 6(2), 163-184; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes6020163 - 31 Mar 2015
Cited by 86 | Viewed by 18695
Abstract
Transport of messenger RNA (mRNA) from the nucleus to the cytoplasm is an essential step of eukaryotic gene expression. In the cell nucleus, a precursor mRNA undergoes a series of processing steps, including capping at the 5' ends, splicing and cleavage/polyadenylation at the [...] Read more.
Transport of messenger RNA (mRNA) from the nucleus to the cytoplasm is an essential step of eukaryotic gene expression. In the cell nucleus, a precursor mRNA undergoes a series of processing steps, including capping at the 5' ends, splicing and cleavage/polyadenylation at the 3' ends. During this process, the mRNA associates with a wide variety of proteins, forming a messenger ribonucleoprotein (mRNP) particle. Association with factors involved in nuclear export also occurs during transcription and processing, and thus nuclear export is fully integrated into mRNA maturation. The coupling between mRNA maturation and nuclear export is an important mechanism for providing only fully functional and competent mRNA to the cytoplasmic translational machinery, thereby ensuring accuracy and swiftness of gene expression. This review describes the molecular mechanism of nuclear mRNA export mediated by the principal transport factors, including Tap-p15 and the TREX complex. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mechanisms of mRNA Nuclear Export)
Show Figures

Figure 1

37 pages, 527 KiB  
Review
Long Non-Coding RNAs in Haematological Malignancies
by Andoni Garitano-Trojaola, Xabier Agirre, Felipe Prósper and Puri Fortes
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14(8), 15386-15422; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms140815386 - 24 Jul 2013
Cited by 44 | Viewed by 13100
Abstract
Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are functional RNAs longer than 200 nucleotides in length. LncRNAs are as diverse as mRNAs and they normally share the same biosynthetic machinery based on RNA polymerase II, splicing and polyadenylation. However, lncRNAs have low coding potential. Compared to [...] Read more.
Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are functional RNAs longer than 200 nucleotides in length. LncRNAs are as diverse as mRNAs and they normally share the same biosynthetic machinery based on RNA polymerase II, splicing and polyadenylation. However, lncRNAs have low coding potential. Compared to mRNAs, lncRNAs are preferentially nuclear, more tissue specific and expressed at lower levels. Most of the lncRNAs described to date modulate the expression of specific genes by guiding chromatin remodelling factors; inducing chromosomal loopings; affecting transcription, splicing, translation or mRNA stability; or serving as scaffolds for the organization of cellular structures. They can function in cis, cotranscriptionally, or in trans, acting as decoys, scaffolds or guides. These functions seem essential to allow cell differentiation and growth. In fact, many lncRNAs have been shown to exert oncogenic or tumor suppressor properties in several cancers including haematological malignancies. In this review, we summarize what is known about lncRNAs, the mechanisms for their regulation in cancer and their role in leukemogenesis, lymphomagenesis and hematopoiesis. Furthermore, we discuss the potential of lncRNAs in diagnosis, prognosis and therapy in cancer, with special attention to haematological malignancies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Regulation by non-coding RNAs 2013)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop