Search Results (72)

Background: Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) is a possible approach for rectal anterior resection (RAR). However, evidence supporting this technique remains limited. This study aims to evaluate the perioperative and oncological outcomes of HALS for RAR at a single tertiary oncology center. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted using a prospectively maintained database. Patients with primary adenocarcinoma of the rectosigmoid junction and rectum who underwent HALS for RAR between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2022 were included. All surgeries were performed by a dedicated colorectal team composed of three surgeons. Results: Among the 1911 surgeries for primary colorectal cancer performed, 469 met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 66 (57–74) years and 63% of the patients were male. Most tumors were cT3-4 (78.9%) and cN+ (71.2%), and neoadjuvant therapy was administered in 70.0% of cases. Low RAR was performed in 73.1% of cases, and an anastomosis was constructed in 95% of cases. The median operative time was 152 (135–180) min, and the conversion rate was 3.8%. Major morbidity occurred in 10.0% of cases, with 30-day and 90-day mortality rates of 0.9% and 1.3%, respectively. The overall anastomotic leak rate was 12.1%, with 9.0% early leaks and 3.1% late leaks. A complete/near-complete mesorectal excision was achieved in 89.6% of cases and an R0 resection in 96.2% of cases. With a median follow-up of 87 months, the locoregional recurrence rate was 2.5%, whereas the distant recurrence rate was 5.9%. The 5-year overall survival was 82.6%. Conclusions: When performed by experienced teams, HALS for RAR is safe and feasible and is associated with a short operative time, low conversion rate, minimal morbidity, and optimal oncologic performance. Full article

Background/Objectives: The improved long-term survival of rectal cancer patients has led to a major increase in the prevalence of functional complications. Understanding which patients are prone to develop major LARS is important for their preoperative counselling and follow-up. Herein, we aimed to assess the risk factors for LARS. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study on rectal cancer patients. All patient and tumour variables, management plan, type of neoadjuvant therapy, radiation dose to anal sphincter, and perioperative outcomes were collected from the hospital electronic databases. We quantified LARS and compared the score before and after surgery (mean follow-up of 42.2 ± 32 months). Results: A total of 182 patients were included for the final analysis. LARS was present in 43.4% (n = 79) of patients, with 14.8% (n = 27) having minor LARS and 28.5% (n = 52) having major LARS. Age (p = 0.03), male gender (p < 0.00001), smoking (p = 0.04), neoadjuvant radiotherapy (p = 0.02), rectal stump length (p = 0.008), end-to-end anastomosis (p = 0.008), and ileostomy (p = 0.002) were found to significantly increase the rate of LARS. A logistic regression model based on the above variables was able to predict major LARS with good predictive value (AUC 0.700). Conclusions: LARS is highly common after sphincter-preserving surgery, and it is significantly more common in young, male patients with a history of smoking, having mid-lower rectal cancers with neoadjuvant radiotherapy, and undergoing TME surgery with end-to-end low anastomosis and ileostomy. Full article

Background: Total mesorectal excision (TME) remains the gold standard for the resection of rectal cancer regardless of the modality: open, laparoscopic, or robotic. The transanal TME (TaTME) approach has been utilized to overcome the difficulties encountered with the dissection of tumors in the distal pelvis. Recently, a single-port robotic approach (rSPa) was introduced, where three arms and a camera emanate from a 2.5 cm diameter port. This report presents the first experience in the United States combining those two approaches (rSPa TaTME) in rectal cancer, evaluating its safety and oncologic outcomes. Methods: This is a retrospective review of our prospectively maintained rectal cancer database. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, neoadjuvant treatment, and oncologic and surgical outcomes were recorded. Results: Between May 2022 and August 2024, ten patients (six females, four males) with a median age at surgery of 53 years (range: 38–85) and a mean BMI of 26 (±5) kg/m² were included for analysis. The median distance of tumors from the anorectal junction was 3.2 cm (range: 2–5.3 cm). All patients had negative margins, with eight complete TME specimens, one near complete, and one incomplete. The mean number of lymph nodes harvested was 24 (±11). The average operative time was 351 (243–411) min. The average length of stay was four days. The ileostomy was reversed in nine out of ten patients. Six patients experienced complications within 30 days of surgery. There were no local or distal recurrences, with a mean follow-up of 20 months (range: 4–30). Conclusions: rSPa TaTME is a unique and innovative method of combining two minimally advanced approaches for the resection of distal rectal cancers, with acceptable surgical and oncologic outcomes. Full article

Background: Robot-assisted total mesorectal excision has been proposed as an alternative to laparoscopic TME for rectal cancer. However, its short-term outcomes and long-term oncological efficacy remain debated, especially in Western populations. This study evaluates the short-term clinical and long-term oncological outcomes of robot-assisted total mesorectal excision performed by experienced surgeons in high-volume European centres. Methods: This multicentre, international, retrospective cohort study included 1390 patients from the EUREKA collaborative dataset who underwent robot-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer between January 2013 and January 2022. All surgeries were performed by expert surgeons beyond the learning curve. Data were analysed for patient demographics, perioperative outcomes, pathological findings, and three-year survival metrics. Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to evaluate overall and disease-free survival. Results: Of 1390 patients, 60.6% underwent restorative low anterior resection. Conversion to open surgery occurred in 3.7%, and postoperative complications were reported in 28.7%. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 14.7% of patients who underwent restorative low anterior resection. The median operative time was 223 min. R0 resection was achieved in 94.7%, and circumferential resection margin positivity was 5.5%. Three-year overall survival was 90.1%, disease-free survival was 88.6%, and local recurrence was 2.9%. Conclusions: Robot-assisted total mesorectal excision performed by experienced surgeons in high-volume European centres is safe, with low conversion rates, acceptable complication rates, and favourable oncological outcomes. These findings underscore the potential of robot-assisted total mesorectal excision as a standard approach for rectal cancer in specialised settings. Full article

Background: Primary malignant bone tumors are exceedingly rare, with an incidence of 0.5 to 1 per million, and sacral localization is even more uncommon, representing only 1–3.5% of these tumors. These malignancies are often diagnosed late due to their asymptomatic nature until they present as large, advanced intrapelvic tumors. Management is complicated by the need for precise surgical intervention and the consideration of adjuvant therapies based on tumor histology and patient factors. Methods: We conducted a single-center, retrospective analysis of patients who underwent complete, partial, or hemisacrectomy for primary malignant bone tumors or recurrent sacral metastases. Excluded were patients with metastatic disease not necessitating sacrectomy. Data collected included demographics, clinical characteristics, tumor types, resection status, adjuvant therapies, recurrence, metastasis, and complications. Surgical approaches were categorized as posterior, anterior, or combined anterior–posterior. The primary outcomes were overall survival and disease-free survival, while the secondary outcomes focused on complication rates and functional outcomes. Results: The study included 19 patients (7 females, 12 males) with a mean age of 48.9 years at the time of surgery. Primary malignancies were present in 90% of patients. Surgical approaches varied: 20% underwent double access and 5% anterior access only, and the remainder had posterior approaches. High partial sacrectomy (above S3) was performed in 20%, while low sacrectomy (at or below S3) was performed in 80%. Complete resection with clean margins (R0) was achieved in 65% of cases, while 35% had R1 resections with microscopic tumor remnants. Root resection was necessary in 25% of patients. Local recurrence occurred in 25% of patients, with two requiring reoperation and neurological sacrifice. Distant metastases were observed in 20% of cases. Postoperative complications affected 60% of patients. The most common issues were surgical wound dehiscence with delayed healing (35%) and visceral changes affecting the bowel and urination (25%). No mechanical complications were reported. Conclusions: Sacrectomy remains a challenging procedure with substantial morbidity and variability in outcomes. The choice of surgical approach—posterior, anterior, or combined—depends on tumor location and extent. While posterior-only approaches are often preferred for lower sacral lesions, combined approaches may be necessary for more extensive tumors. Survival and disease-free survival rates are influenced by resection margins and the biological behavior of the tumor. Wide-margin resections (R0) are associated with lower local recurrence rates but do not eliminate the risk of distant metastases. Full article

Background/Objectives: The management of locally advanced rectal cancer has evolved significantly, shaped by advances in multimodal neoadjuvant therapy and a growing emphasis on organ preservation through the watch-and-wait approach. These advancements, however, introduce complex treatment decisions that require careful consideration by both patients and clinicians. Methods: This narrative review explores the evolution of the management of locally advanced rectal cancer and the role of shared decision-making in guiding treatment decisions, particularly for patients facing decisions between surgical resection and watch-and-wait. Additionally, it discusses the development of tools to aid in shared-decision making, current challenges in implementing shared decision-making and future directions for improvement patient centered care in locally advanced rectal cancer management. Results: Considerations for decision making include anatomical considerations that influence surgical options, the potential benefits and risks of watch-and-wait versus surgical resection of the rectum, and the impact of treatment on bowel, urinary, and sexual function. Additionally, patients must weigh the long-term implications of their choices on quality of life. Conclusions: Shared decision-making has emerged as a critical component of patient-centered care and ensures that treatment decisions align with patients’ values and priorities. Given the preference-sensitive nature of the management of locally advanced rectal cancer, shared decision-making plays an important role in helping patients navigate these decisions. Full article

Background/Objectives: Anastomotic leakage (AL) remains a major complication after restorative rectal cancer surgery, with accurate preoperative risk stratification posing a significant challenge. Pelvic measurements derived from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have been proposed as potential predictors of AL, but their clinical utility remains uncertain. Methods: This retrospective, multicenter cohort study analyzed rectal cancer patients undergoing restorative surgery between 2013 and 2021. Pelvic dimensions were assessed using MRI-based pelvimetry. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses identified independent risk factors for AL. Subsequently, machine Learning (ML) models—logistic regression, random forest classifier, and XGBoost—were developed to predict AL using preoperative clinical data alone and in combination with pelvimetry. Model performance was evaluated using F1 scores, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC-AUC) and precision–recall curves (AUC-PR) as primary metrics. Results: Among 487 patients, the overall AL rate was 14%. Multivariate regression analysis identified distance to the anorectal junction, pelvic inlet width, and interspinous distance as independent risk factors for AL (p < 0.05). The logistic regression model incorporating pelvimetry achieved the highest predictive performance, with a mean ROC-AUC of 0.70 ± 0.09 and AUC-PR of 0.32 ± 0.10. Although predictive models that included pelvic measurements demonstrated higher ROC-AUCs compared to those without pelvimetry, the improvement was not statistically significant. Conclusions: Pelvic dimensions, specifically pelvic inlet and interspinous distance, were independently associated with an increased risk of AL. While ML models incorporating pelvimetry showed only moderate predictive performance, these measurements should be considered in developing clinical prediction tools for AL to enhance preoperative risk stratification. Full article

Background: Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (ACP) is a life-threatening, rare condition of non-mechanical colon dilatation that can result in bowel ischaemia and perforation. The aetiology is relatively unknown but includes older age coupled with high comorbidity, decreased parasympathetic activity, certain medications, chemoradiotherapy and recent surgery. There are limited research data on ACP following reversal of ileostomy after ultra-low anterior resections (ULAR), thus this systematic review included cases from various types of bowel surgeries. Methods: A comprehensive literature search of relevant articles was conducted using the EMBASE, Medline, PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus databases. Two cases of ACP following ileostomy reversal after ULAR for rectal cancer were also reported from the authors’ rural institution. This systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Results: A total of 522 studies were screened of which five case reports were included. Two case series (six patients) and the two patients from the authors’ rural institution developed ACP following reversal of ileostomy post-ULAR with potential causes being the > 6 months’ time from initial surgery to reversal causing prolonged colonic mucosal inflammation and reduced wall contractile strength. Anastomotic leak and chemoradiotherapy were other considerations. One of the rural patients developed right colon ischaemia and perforation needing urgent laparotomy, right hemicolectomy and formation of end ileostomy and mucous fistula. Conservative treatment included aperients, enemas, flatus tube, bedside or endoscopic decompression, and neostigmine. Conclusions: Early recognition is vital to treat ACP with medical therapy and decompression to prevent bowel ischaemia and perforation. Further research is needed to better characterise the aetiology, incidence and management strategies for this rare condition. Full article

Background and Objectives: Colorectal cancer is the third most common type of cancer in men and women. With advancements in technology, minimally invasive treatment options have become increasingly prominent in colorectal cancer surgery. This study aimed to compare the increased intra-abdominal pressure in laparoscopic colon and rectal surgery with open procedures using kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) secreted from renal tubules. Materials and Methods: We enrolled 46 patients diagnosed with colon cancer who underwent laparoscopic and open surgical procedures at our clinic. The patients were prospectively randomized into five groups: 10 laparoscopic right hemicolectomies (Group 1), 8 open right hemicolectomies (Group 2), 8 laparoscopic anterior resections (LARs) (Group 3), 11 open anterior resections (Group 4), and 9 laparoscopic low anterior resections (Group 5). Urine samples were collected from the patients preoperatively, postoperatively at the 4th hour, and postoperatively on the 14th day, and the urine KIM-1 levels and urine creatinine (Cr) values were measured. The urine KIM-1/Cr ratios were subsequently calculated. Results: The urinary KIM-1/Cr levels increased at the 4th postoperative hour after the open and laparoscopic procedures. On postoperative day 14, the urinary KIM-1/Cr levels were lower than those in the preoperative period in all groups, except the LAR group. Conclusions: Our study shown that the average pressure in laparoscopic colon and rectal surgery did not have a long-term impact on kidney injury in comparison to open colon and rectal surgery. Full article

Background/Objectives: Transanal irrigation (TAI) has been recognized as a safe and effective treatment for neurological bowel dysfunction, chronic constipation or fecal incontinence and has also been proposed for patients with low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). The aim of the present systematic review was to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of TAI in patients with significant LARS symptoms. Methods: We performed a systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement and guidelines in addition to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42023436839). The risk of bias was assessed using a modified version of the Downs and Black checklist. The main outcome was improvement in low anterior resection syndrome after TAI assessed by change in LARS score. Results: After an initial screening of 3703 studies, 9 were included and underwent qualitative synthesis (among them, 3 were randomized clinical trials). All studies recorded an improvement in LARS score following TAI procedure and almost all studies showed an improvement in other bowel function outcomes (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Bowel Function Instrument (MSKCC BFI, ), Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score (CCIS), visual analog scale (VAS), Cleveland Clinic Florida Fecal Incontinence Score (CCFFIS), fecal incontinence score (FI score), Obstructed Defecation Syndrome (ODS) score) and quality of life (QoL) scores. The discontinuation rate ranged from 0% to 41%. The rate of adverse events was high (from 0 to 93%); moreover, no uniformity was found in the various protocols used among the different studies. Conclusions: The results of this review show that TAI is effective in the treatment of LARS, improving the LARS score, the other bowel function outcomes and the QoL scores. The absence of a treatment protocol validated by the scientific community is reflected in the high disparity in terms of adverse events and discontinuation of therapy, in addition to representing an intrinsic limitation to the study itself. Full article

Objectives: The aim of the study was to assess the diagnosis and evolution of low anterior rectal resection syndrome (LARS) in patients admitted to a tertiary surgical center in Romania. Materials and Methods: From 120 patients initially included in the analysis, after applying the exclusion criteria, we selected 102 patients diagnosed and operated on for neoplasm of the upper, middle, and lower rectum for which resection and excision (partial or total) of mesorectum was associated. All the patients we treated in the general surgery department of the County Emergency Hospital of Craiova within a time frame of 5 years (1 October 2017–1 September 2022), and all experienced at least one symptom associated with LARS. The group included 68 men and 34 women aged between 35 and 88, who were followed-up for at least 2 years. Patients with progression of neoplastic disease, with advanced neurological disease, and those who died less than 2 years after surgery were excluded. Results: The overall incidence varied by gender, site of the tumor (requiring a certain type of surgery), and anastomotic complications, and it was directly proportional to the time interval between resection and restoration of continuity of digestion. Conclusions: Obesity, size of the remaining rectum, total excision of the mesorectum, anastomotic complications, and prolonged ileostomy time are cofactors in the etiology of LARS. The LARS score decreased in most patients during the 2-year follow-up, although there were a small number of patients in whom the decrease was insignificant. The persistence of major LARS at 6 months after surgery may predict the need for a definitive colostomy. Full article

Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess any predisposing factors to the morbidity of fashioning and reversal of diverting ileostomy in a prospective cohort of patients who have undergone TME and low colo-rectal or colo-anal anastomosis for rectal cancer. Materials and Methods: Consecutive patients with rectal cancer undergoing low anterior resection and a defunctioning loop ileostomy in three surgical units from 2016 to 2020 were included in the study and retrospectively analyzed. Results: One hundred eighty-two patients from three centres were included. Ileostomy-related mortality was 0.5%, attributed to renal failure.. Ileostomy-related morbidity was 46%. Postoperative ileus was seen in 37.4%, and dehydration in 18.8% of the patients. The readmission rate for ileostomy-related reasons was 15.4%. Stoma care was problematic in 15.7% or poor in 7% of the cases. Advanced age, male gender and obesity were independent risk factors for ileostomy-related morbidity. Ileostomy was reversed in 165 patients. The morbidity in 165 patients was 16%. Ileus was seen in 10.3%, anastomotic leak in 4.8% and wound infection in 12.7% of the cases. One patient died because of an anastomotic leak. No predisposing factors that affect the outcomes of ileostomy closure were identified. Conclusions: Diverting ileostomy-related morbidity is high. Life threatening dehydration and renal failure from ileus is more commonly seen in elderly, male and obese patients and should be anticipated. Ileostomy closure-related morbidity is low. Full article

An ectopic thyroid (ET) involves numerous scenarios of detection and outcomes, while its current management is not standardised. A mediastinal ET (MET) represents a low index of suspicion. In this paper, we introduce a 47-year-old female who was accidentally identified with an MET, and a modern surgical approach was provided. An anterior mediastinal mass of 3.2 cm was found at CT upon a prior COVID-19 infection. Previous to the infection, she experienced non-specific complaints for a few months (intermittent night sweats, facial erythema, chest pressure, and dyspnoea). Also, CT identified a thymus-like mass and a left adrenal incidentaloma of 3 cm. The endocrine panel was normal, and the subject declined further investigations. She was re-admitted 12 months later: the MET had increased +1 cm (+45% volume) and was confirmed at a 99mTc pertechnetate scintigraphy. Noting the symptoms, mediastinal anatomy, and size change, the MET was removed via a minimally invasive trans-cervical approach (eutopic gland preservation) with the help of a Cooper thymectomy retractor (which also allowed for a synchronous thymus mass resection). No post-operatory complications were registered, the thyroid function remained normal, and the mentioned symptoms were remitted. A histological exam confirmed a benign MET and thymus hyperplasia, respectively. To conclude, this case pinpoints important aspects, such as the clinical picture became clear only upon thoracic surgery due to the complete remission of the complaints that initially seemed widely non-specific. The incidental MET finding was associated with a second (adrenal) incidentaloma, a scenario that might not be so rare, following multiple imaging scans amid the COVID-19 era (no common pathogenic traits have been identified so far). The co-presence of a thymus mass represented one more argument for surgery. Minimally invasive cervicotomy associated with eutopic gland conservation and the use of a Cooper thymectomy retractor highlight modern aspects in video-assisted thoracic surgery, which provided an excellent outcome, involving one of the lowest mediastinal thyroids to be removed by this specific procedure. Awareness of such unusual entities helps inform individualised, multidisciplinary decisions for optimum prognoses. Full article

Introduction: Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) can be a debilitating condition that develops after undergoing sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy is a common side effect of platinum-based chemotherapy agents used as systemic therapy for rectal cancer treatment. The purpose of this study was to determine the potential relationship between CIPN and LARS. Methods: This was a retrospective review of patients who underwent a low anterior resection for rectal cancer and received systemic therapy contacted at least six months from the most recent surgery. Eligible patients were called and completed the relevant surveys over the phone or email. Results: There was a total of 42 patients who completed the surveys with 33 (79%) having major LARS. Presence of a diverting ileostomy was the only significantly differentcharacteristic in those with major LARS versus those without. CIPN was independently associated with LARS (p = 0.046) on linear regression when controlling for neoadjuvant chemoradiation, diverting ileostomy and tumor distance from the anal verge. Conclusions: Developing severe CIPN is associated with developing LARS. Further studies evaluating the etiology behind this relationship should be conducted. Full article

Background: Biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma is a rare low-grade tumor arising from the sinonasal tract, featuring locally aggressive biological behavior, with a tendency to invade the orbit and skull base. There are no defined guidelines of treatment; thus, the management varies among different institutions. The aim of the present study is to provide a modular system of surgical approaches according to the lesion pattern of growth from a literature review. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive and detailed literature review on the PubMed and Embase online electronic databases on biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma with orbital invasion was conducted. A personal case exhibiting peculiar features was also added. Demographic (patient’s sex and age), clinical (presenting symptoms and time to treatment), neuroradiological (anatomical origin and pattern of growth), and treatment (type of treatment, surgical approach, extent of resection, peri- and postoperative complications, and adjuvant therapies) data, as well as clinical outcome, recurrence rates, and overall survival, were analyzed. Results: Thirty-one patients harboring biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma with orbital invasion were identified. Tumors mainly affected female patients (66.7%) and a middle-aged population (median 55.2 years old). Simultaneous skull base involvement occurred in most cases (80.6%). Surgery was performed in all but one case (97%), as unique treatment (59%) or in association with radio—(23.5%) and/or chemotherapy (5.9%/2.9%), allowing for gross total tumor resection in most cases (66.7%). The endoscopic endonasal approach was the most adopted surgical corridor (51.7%). The local recurrence rate was 19.3%, and only two cases of tumor-related mortality occurred. Conclusions: Surgery is the only curative treatment, with the main goal to restore/improve/arrest progression of clinical manifestations. The endoscopic endonasal route represents the master approach for lesions confined to the midline. Microsurgical transcranial and endoscopic transorbital approaches have a complementary role for addressing the lesion’s component with large intracranial extension or affecting the paramedian aspect of the anterior cranial fossa and superior–lateral orbital compartment, respectively. The approach selection should be made case by case according to the tumor pattern of growth. Full article