Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (18)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = glyphosate-tolerant soybean

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
12 pages, 674 KiB  
Article
Soybean Response to Saflufenacil Doses, Alone or Combined with Glyphosate, Simulating Tank Contamination
by Leandro Galon, Lucas Tedesco, Rodrigo José Tonin, Aline Diovana Ribeiro dos Anjos, Eduarda Batistelli Giacomolli, Otávio Augusto Dassoler, Felipe Bittencourt Ortiz and Gismael Francisco Perin
Agronomy 2025, 15(8), 1758; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15081758 - 23 Jul 2025
Viewed by 270
Abstract
Some herbicides, such as saflufenacil, can persist as residues in sprayer tanks even after cleaning, causing phytotoxicity in sensitive crops. This study aimed to simulate potential injury caused by saflufenacil residues, applied alone or combined with glyphosate, on soybean. The field experiment was [...] Read more.
Some herbicides, such as saflufenacil, can persist as residues in sprayer tanks even after cleaning, causing phytotoxicity in sensitive crops. This study aimed to simulate potential injury caused by saflufenacil residues, applied alone or combined with glyphosate, on soybean. The field experiment was conducted using a randomized complete block design with four replicates. The treatments included glyphosate (1440 g ha−1), eight saflufenacil doses ranging from 1.09 to 70.00 g ha−1, each tested alone or combined with glyphosate, and a weed-free control, totaling 18 treatments. Phytotoxicity was assessed at 7, 14, 21, 28, and 35 days after treatment (DAT). Physiological variables were measured at 21 DAT, and grain yield components were evaluated at harvest. Saflufenacil caused increasing phytotoxicity at doses exceeding 4.38 g ha−1 when applied alone and above 2.17 g ha−1 when combined with glyphosate. The highest doses negatively affected soybean physiology and grain yield components. Soybean tolerated up to 2.17 g ha−1 saflufenacil alone and up to 1.09 g ha−1 combined with glyphosate without significant yield loss. These results highlight the importance of thorough and correct cleaning of the sprayer tank and suggest limit residue levels that avoid crop damage, helping to prevent unexpected damage to soybean in crop rotations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Weed Biology and Ecology: Importance to Integrated Weed Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 837 KiB  
Article
Cultivation of Genetically Modified Soybeans Did Not Alter the Overall Structure of Rhizosphere Soil Microbial Communities
by Wenjing Shen, Laipan Liu, Zhixiang Fang, Li Zhang, Zhentao Ren, Qi Yu, Xin Yin and Biao Liu
Plants 2025, 14(3), 457; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14030457 - 4 Feb 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1118
Abstract
Herbicide-tolerant soybeans are the most extensively cultivated genetically modified (GM) crop globally. The effects of GM soybean and associated agronomic practices on soil microbial communities remain poorly understood. This study aimed to investigate the impact of planting GM soybeans with a glyphosate application [...] Read more.
Herbicide-tolerant soybeans are the most extensively cultivated genetically modified (GM) crop globally. The effects of GM soybean and associated agronomic practices on soil microbial communities remain poorly understood. This study aimed to investigate the impact of planting GM soybeans with a glyphosate application on soil microbial diversity. The main bacterial and fungal community compositions (phylum level) were consistent for GM and non-GM soybeans. The alpha diversity analysis indicated that the bacterial Shannon index was significantly higher in GM rhizosphere soil during flowering compared to non-GM soil. There were no significant differences in the Shannon, Simpson, or ACE indices of the soil fungal communities between GM and non-GM soybeans in the same period. The PCoA analysis showed no significant differences in community structure between the GM and non-GM soybean soil for either fungi or bacteria during the same period. Although the relative abundance of Bradyrhizobium at the seedling stage was significantly lower in those GM than in those non-GM, it did not affect the final number of root nodules in either soybean type. The relative abundance of Frankia was significantly lower in GM rhizosphere soil during the seedling and flowering stages, whereas that of Thelebolus was significantly higher during flowering and pod filling. The abundance and ecological functions of these taxa warrant continuous monitoring. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Safety of Genetically Modified Crops and Plant Functional Genomics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 10808 KiB  
Article
A Rapid Field-Visualization Detection Platform for Genetically Modified Soybean ‘Zhonghuang 6106’ Based on RPA-CRISPR
by Ran Tao, Jihong Zhang, Lixia Meng, Jin Gao, Chaohua Miao, Weixiao Liu, Wujun Jin and Yusong Wan
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(1), 108; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26010108 - 26 Dec 2024
Viewed by 955
Abstract
Genetically modified (GM) herbicide-tolerant soybean ‘Zhonghuang 6106’, which introduces a glyphosate-resistant gene, ensures soybean yield while allowing farmers to reduce the use of other herbicides, thereby reducing weed management costs. To protect consumer rights and facilitate government supervision, we have established a simple [...] Read more.
Genetically modified (GM) herbicide-tolerant soybean ‘Zhonghuang 6106’, which introduces a glyphosate-resistant gene, ensures soybean yield while allowing farmers to reduce the use of other herbicides, thereby reducing weed management costs. To protect consumer rights and facilitate government supervision, we have established a simple and rapid on-site nucleic acid detection method for GM soybean ‘Zhonghuang 6106’. This method leverages the isothermal amplification characteristics of RPA technology and the high specificity of CRISPR-Cas12a to achieve high sensitivity and accuracy in detecting GM soybean components. By optimizing experimental conditions, the platform can quickly produce visual detection results, significantly reducing detection time and improving efficiency. The system can detect down to 10 copies/μL of ‘Zhonghuang 6106’ DNA templates, and the entire detection process takes about 1 h. The technology also has strong editing capabilities; by redesigning the primers and crRNA in the method, it can become a specific detection method for other GM samples, providing strong technical support for the regulation and safety evaluation of GM crops. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Plant Sciences)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1255 KiB  
Article
Using Cover Crops as Means of Controlling Weeds and Reducing the Applied Quantity of Glyphosate-Based Herbicide in No-Till Glyphosate Tolerant Soybean and Corn
by Jérôme Bernier Brillon, Marc Lucotte, Ariane Bernier, Myriam Fontaine and Matthieu Moingt
Agriculture 2024, 14(5), 659; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14050659 - 24 Apr 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1365
Abstract
Weeds represent a serious drawback affecting the productivity of field crops worldwide. While the most common approach to control weeds in no-till practices is the use of glyphosate-based herbicides (GBHs), reducing their use represents a major challenge. This two-year field study aims to [...] Read more.
Weeds represent a serious drawback affecting the productivity of field crops worldwide. While the most common approach to control weeds in no-till practices is the use of glyphosate-based herbicides (GBHs), reducing their use represents a major challenge. This two-year field study aims to evaluate whether the use of cover crops (CC) in transgenic soybean and corn productions can (1) help control weeds and (2) reduce the amount of GBH needed for managing weeds. Sampling was carried out in 32 experimental field plots (four crop managements with four replicates on both crops). Crop managements consisted of GBH applications at rates of 0.84, 1.67, and 3.3 L ha−1 in plots in direct seeding with CC (DSCC) and at rates of 3.3 L ha−1 in plots without CC (DS). Weed cover rates, plant parameters (fresh and dry weights and heights), grain yields, water, and cation contents in soil were considered as indicators of interspecific competition. Results obtained in both years show that it is possible to reduce GBH use by 50% in plots with CC compared to plots without CC using a rate of GBH application of 3.33 L ha−1 (DS 3.3). However, weeds had a large impact on water content in soil, which was reflected by smaller plants and lower yields in plots with only 0.84 L ha−1 of GBH applied. In the context of the study, the use of CCs seems to facilitate the development of more sustainable agriculture while reducing the quantities of GBH generally used. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Benefits and Challenges of Cover Crops in Agricultural Systems)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 3149 KiB  
Article
Using Partial Least Squares and Regression to Interpret Temperature and Precipitation Effects on Maize and Soybean Genetic Variance Expression
by Amanda J. Ashworth, Fred L. Allen and Arnold M. Saxton
Agronomy 2023, 13(11), 2752; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13112752 - 31 Oct 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2020
Abstract
Partial least squares (PLS) is a statistical technique that can evaluate the association of large numbers of external environmental variables with biological responses. PLS is a good method for analyzing the relative importance of variables and compressing the data for regression analyses. The [...] Read more.
Partial least squares (PLS) is a statistical technique that can evaluate the association of large numbers of external environmental variables with biological responses. PLS is a good method for analyzing the relative importance of variables and compressing the data for regression analyses. The objective of this study was to use PLS and regression analyses on soybean (Glycine max L.) and maize (Zea mays L.) variety trial results for five (soybean) or three (maize) maturity group (MG) tests, at five Tennessee locations spanning 14 years, in order to determine the environmental effects (weekly minimum and maximum air temperature and precipitation) on the expression of yield genetic variance (Vg). Overall, PLS excelled at identifying combinations of weather variables to develop models with high R2 values (41–59%) relative to the regression analysis (R2 = 34–44%), but they did not address the effects of specific variables as in regression analysis. In both maize and soybean, differences in genetic variance occurred among MG tests and locations. Overall, precipitation was the driving variable for maize Vg, indicating maize is more sensitive to rain events during the growing season than soybean, i.e., with each cm of precipitation, maize Vg increased by 11.38–23.78 (Mg ha−1)2. The results suggest that ensuring adequate water, particularly during weeks 3 and 6, is critical for maize Vg, regardless of the MG test and location. Genetically modified soybean cultivars responded similarly to conventional cultivars, suggesting no Vg response differences due to the glyphosate tolerance trait. These results have important implications for irrigation timing for the maximum expression of genetic differences in maize and soybean cultivars, particularly for management planning during future stochastic weather events. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Crop Breeding and Genetics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 2153 KiB  
Article
Influence of No-Till System with or without Cover Crops on Stomata Sensitivity of Glyphosate-Tolerant Soybeans to Vapor Pressure Deficit
by Jérôme Bernier Brillon, Matthieu Moingt and Marc Lucotte
Physiologia 2023, 3(4), 531-541; https://doi.org/10.3390/physiologia3040039 - 25 Oct 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1324
Abstract
Soybeans are vulnerable to drought and temperature increases potentially induced by climate change. Hydraulic dysfunction and stomatal closure to avoid excessive transpiration are the main problems caused by drought. The vulnerability of soybeans to drought will depend on the intensity and duration of [...] Read more.
Soybeans are vulnerable to drought and temperature increases potentially induced by climate change. Hydraulic dysfunction and stomatal closure to avoid excessive transpiration are the main problems caused by drought. The vulnerability of soybeans to drought will depend on the intensity and duration of water stress. The purpose of this study was to determine if the use of cover crops (CCs) can influence the gas exchange potential of glyphosate-tolerant soybeans when the vapor pressure deficit (Vpd) increases. This two-year study was conducted in an open experimental field comprising direct seeding plots with or without CCs. Stomatal conductance (Gs) was measured five times on the same identified leaves following glyphosate-based herbicide application. These leaves were then collected in order to observe the stomata and foliar traits with a scanning electron microscope. The Vpd was calculated concomitantly to Gs measurements at the leaf surface. The results suggest that the use of CCs promotes phenotypic change in soybean leaves (more elaborate venation and a higher abaxial stomatal density), which in turn may enhance their tolerance to drier conditions. In 2019, Gs could be up to 29% higher in plots with CCs compared to those without CCs with similar Vpd values. This study shows that the benefits of using CCs can be observed via the morphological development strategies of the crop plants and their higher tolerance to drought. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 6314 KiB  
Article
Comparison of Glyphosate-Degradation Ability of Aldo-Keto Reductase (AKR4) Proteins in Maize, Soybean and Rice
by Ronghua Chen, Siwei Wang, Yue Sun, Haiqing Li, Shuqing Wan, Fei Lin and Hanhong Xu
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(4), 3421; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24043421 - 8 Feb 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2444
Abstract
Genes that participate in the degradation or isolation of glyphosate in plants are promising, for they endow crops with herbicide tolerance with a low glyphosate residue. Recently, the aldo-keto reductase (AKR4) gene in Echinochloa colona (EcAKR4) was identified as a naturally [...] Read more.
Genes that participate in the degradation or isolation of glyphosate in plants are promising, for they endow crops with herbicide tolerance with a low glyphosate residue. Recently, the aldo-keto reductase (AKR4) gene in Echinochloa colona (EcAKR4) was identified as a naturally evolved glyphosate-metabolism enzyme. Here, we compared the glyphosate-degradation ability of theAKR4 proteins from maize, soybean and rice, which belong to a clade containing EcAKR4 in the phylogenetic tree, by incubation of glyphosate with AKR proteins both in vivo and in vitro. The results indicated that, except for OsALR1, the other proteins were characterized as glyphosate-metabolism enzymes, with ZmAKR4 ranked the highest activity, and OsAKR4-1 and OsAKR4-2 exhibiting the highest activity among the AKR4 family in rice. Moreover, OsAKR4-1 was confirmed to endow glyphosate-tolerance at the plant level. Our study provides information on the mechanism underlying the glyphosate-degradation ability of AKR proteins in crops, which enables the development of glyphosate-resistant crops with a low glyphosate residue, mediated by AKRs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Crop Biotic and Abiotic Stress Tolerance 2.0)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 3716 KiB  
Article
Water Stress Alters Morphophysiological, Grain Quality and Vegetation Indices of Soybean Cultivars
by Cássio Jardim Tavares, Walter Quadros Ribeiro Junior, Maria Lucrecia Gerosa Ramos, Lucas Felisberto Pereira, Raphael Augusto das Chagas Noqueli Casari, André Ferreira Pereira, Carlos Antonio Ferreira de Sousa, Anderson Rodrigo da Silva, Sebastião Pedro da Silva Neto and Liliane Marcia Mertz-Henning
Plants 2022, 11(4), 559; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11040559 - 21 Feb 2022
Cited by 25 | Viewed by 3773
Abstract
Rainfall is among the climatic factors that most affect production, as in the Brazilian Cerrado. Non-destructive and automated phenotyping methods are fast and efficient for genotype selection. The objective of this work was to evaluate, under field conditions, the morphophysiological changes, yield, and [...] Read more.
Rainfall is among the climatic factors that most affect production, as in the Brazilian Cerrado. Non-destructive and automated phenotyping methods are fast and efficient for genotype selection. The objective of this work was to evaluate, under field conditions, the morphophysiological changes, yield, and grain quality of soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill) under water stress in the Brazilian Cerrado. The plots comprised six soybean cultivars and the subplots of four water regimes, corresponding to 31, 44, 64 and 100% of crop evapotranspiration replacement. The experiments were conducted from May to September 2018 and 2019. An irrigation system with a bar of sprinklers with different flow rates was used. Gas exchange, vegetation indices (measured using a hyperspectral sensor embedded in a drone), yield and grain quality were evaluated. Water stress had different effects on gas exchange, vegetation indices, grain yield and chemical composition among the cultivars. Embrapa cultivar BRS 7280 Roundup ready (RR) and Nidera cultivar NA 5909 RG (glyphosate resistant) are yield stable and have a greater tolerance to drought. BRS 7280RR showed a higher tolerance to drought and higher water use efficiency (WUE) than all other tested cultivars. Vegetation indices, such as the NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index), correlated with the morphophysiological traits, such as plant height, were the most responsive variables to water stress. The NDVI can be used to predict soybean yield as a tool in a selection program under drought. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 2747 KiB  
Article
Proteomic Profile of Glyphosate-Resistant Soybean under Combined Herbicide and Drought Stress Conditions
by Rafael Fonseca Benevenuto, Caroline Bedin Zanatta, Miguel Pedro Guerra, Rubens Onofre Nodari and Sarah Z. Agapito-Tenfen
Plants 2021, 10(11), 2381; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10112381 - 5 Nov 2021
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 4046
Abstract
While some genetically modified (GM) plants have been targeted to confer tolerance to abiotic stressors, transgenes are impacted by abiotic stressors, causing adverse effects on plant physiology and yield. However, routine safety analyses do not assess the response of GM plants under different [...] Read more.
While some genetically modified (GM) plants have been targeted to confer tolerance to abiotic stressors, transgenes are impacted by abiotic stressors, causing adverse effects on plant physiology and yield. However, routine safety analyses do not assess the response of GM plants under different environmental stress conditions. In the context of climate change, the combination of abiotic stressors is a reality in agroecosystems. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze the metabolic cost by assessing the proteomic profiles of GM soybean varieties under glyphosate spraying and water deficit conditions compared to their non-transgenic conventional counterparts. We found evidence of cumulative adverse effects that resulted in the reduction of enzymes involved in carbohydrate metabolism, along with the expression of amino acids and nitrogen metabolic enzymes. Ribosomal metabolism was significantly enriched, particularly the protein families associated with ribosomal complexes L5 and L18. The interaction network map showed that the affected module representing the ribosome pathway interacts strongly with other important proteins, such as the chloro-plastic gamma ATP synthase subunit. Combined, these findings provide clear evidence for increasing the metabolic costs of GM soybean plants in response to the accumulation of stress factors. First, alterations in the ribosome pathway indicate that the GM plant itself carries a metabolic burden associated with the biosynthesis of proteins as effects of genetic transformation. GM plants also showed an imbalance in energy demand and production under controlled conditions, which was increased under drought conditions. Identifying the consequences of altered metabolism related to the interaction between plant transgene stress responses allows us to understand the possible effects on the ecology and evolution of plants in the medium and long term and the potential interactions with other organisms when these organisms are released in the environment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Potential Unintended Effects of Genetic Technologies in Plants)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 12783 KiB  
Article
Differential Assembly and Shifts of the Rhizosphere Bacterial Community by a Dual Transgenic Glyphosate-Tolerant Soybean Line with and without Glyphosate Application
by Minkai Yang, Zhongling Wen, Chenyu Hao, Aliya Fazal, Yonghui Liao, Fuhe Luo, Weixuan Yao, Tongming Yin, Rongwu Yang, Jinliang Qi, Zhi Hong, Guihua Lu and Yonghua Yang
Horticulturae 2021, 7(10), 374; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7100374 - 8 Oct 2021
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2745
Abstract
Modern agriculture has gained significant economic benefits worldwide with the use of genetically modified (GM) technologies. While GM crops provide convenience to humans, their biosafety has attracted increasing concern. In this study, the Illumina MiSeq was used to perform a high-throughput sequencing of [...] Read more.
Modern agriculture has gained significant economic benefits worldwide with the use of genetically modified (GM) technologies. While GM crops provide convenience to humans, their biosafety has attracted increasing concern. In this study, the Illumina MiSeq was used to perform a high-throughput sequencing of the V3-V4 hypervariable regions of 16S rRNA gene (16S rDNA) amplicons to compare the rhizosphere bacterial communities of the EPSPS/GAT dual transgenic glyphosate-tolerant soybean line Z106, its recipient variety ZH10, and Z106 with glyphosate application (Z106G) during flowering, seed filling, and maturing stages under field settings. At each of the three stages, the alpha and beta diversity of rhizosphere bacterial communities revealed no significant differences between ZH10, Z106, and Z106G. However, some bacterial taxa demonstrated a greater proportional contribution, particularly the nitrogen-fixing rhizobium Ensifer fredii, in the rhizospheric soil of Z106 at the seed filling and maturing stages, when compared to ZH10 and Z106G. The present study therefore suggests that the EPSPS/GAT dual transgenic line Z106 and exogenous glyphosate application have a minimal effect on the composition of the soybean rhizosphere bacterial community but have no impact on the structure of the rhizosphere microbial community during a single planting season. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advancements in Soil Health)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

14 pages, 548 KiB  
Article
Effect of Deposition Aids Tank-Mixed with Herbicides on Cotton and Soybean Canopy Deposition and Spray Droplet Parameters
by Chase Allen Samples, Thomas R. Butts, Bruno C. Vieira, Jon Trenton Irby, Daniel B. Reynolds, Angus Catchot, Greg R. Kruger and Darrin M. Dodds
Agronomy 2021, 11(2), 278; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11020278 - 3 Feb 2021
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3573
Abstract
The adoption of auxin-tolerant crops has increased awareness regarding herbicide off-target movement. Deposition aids are promoted as a possible solution to off-target movement, although their effect on spray canopy deposition are not well understood. Studies were conducted to determine the impact of deposition [...] Read more.
The adoption of auxin-tolerant crops has increased awareness regarding herbicide off-target movement. Deposition aids are promoted as a possible solution to off-target movement, although their effect on spray canopy deposition are not well understood. Studies were conducted to determine the impact of deposition aids tank-mixed with herbicides on spray droplet size and canopy deposition. Commonly used herbicides were applied on soybean and cotton in combination with deposition aids (oil, polymer, and guargum). Interactions between herbicide solution and deposition aid influenced droplet size parameters for both cotton and soybean herbicides tested herein (p ≤ 0.0001). Generally, the addition of polymer and guargum deposition aids increased spray droplet size, whereas the addition of oil deposition aid decreased droplet size for some treatments. When herbicides were combined, the inclusion of deposition aids did not influence overall spray deposition on cotton (p = 0.82) and soybean (p = 0.72). When herbicide solutions were evaluated individually, the advent of deposition aids had inconsistent results with cotton and soybean spray deposition being unaffected, increased, or even decreased depending on the herbicide solution tested. For example, the polymer-based deposition aid increased spray deposition on cotton for applications of glyphosate + dicamba + S-metolachlor resulting in 1640.6 RFU (relative fluorescence units). However, the same deposition aid decreased spray deposition on cotton for applications of glyphosate + dicamba + acetochlor (1179.3 RFU). Although deposition aids influenced spray deposition on cotton and soybean for some herbicide combinations, their use should be determined on a case-by-case scenario. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 2012 KiB  
Article
Reduced Herbicide Antagonism of Grass Weed Control through Spray Application Technique
by Luke H. Merritt, Jason Connor Ferguson, Ashli E. Brown-Johnson, Daniel B. Reynolds, Te-Ming Tseng and John Wesley Lowe
Agronomy 2020, 10(8), 1131; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10081131 - 4 Aug 2020
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 5874
Abstract
Dicamba and 2,4-D tolerance traits were introduced to soybean and cotton, allowing for over the top applications of these herbicides. Avoiding antagonism of glyphosate and clethodim by dicamba or 2,4-D is necessary to achieve optimum weed control. Three field studies were conducted in [...] Read more.
Dicamba and 2,4-D tolerance traits were introduced to soybean and cotton, allowing for over the top applications of these herbicides. Avoiding antagonism of glyphosate and clethodim by dicamba or 2,4-D is necessary to achieve optimum weed control. Three field studies were conducted in fallow fields with broadleaf signalgrass (Urochloa platyphylla) and Italian ryegrass (Lolium perenne ssp. multiflorum) pressure. A tractor-mounted dual boom sprayer was modified to spray one of three application methods: (1) two herbicides tanked-mixed (TMX); (2) two herbicides in separate tanks mixed in the boom line (MIL); and (3) two herbicides in separate tanks applied through separate booms simultaneously (SPB). One study compared the three application methods with sethoxydim applied with bentazon, the second compared clethodim applied with dicamba or 2,4-D, and the third compared glyphosate applied with dicamba or 2,4-D. In most cases over all three trials, there was a 7–15% increase in efficacy when using the SPB application method. Antagonism of all the herbicide combinations above was observed when applied using the TMX and MIL methods. In some cases, antagonism was avoided when using the SPB method. The separate boom application method increased efficacy, which allowed herbicides to be used more effectively, resulting in improved economic and environmental sustainability of herbicide applications. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 936 KiB  
Article
Dicamba Retention in Commercial Sprayers Following Triple Rinse Cleanout Procedures, and Soybean Response to Contamination Concentrations
by Frances B. Browne, Xiao Li, Katilyn J Price, Jianping Wang, Yi Wang, Greg R Kruger, Jeff Golus, Gabrielle de Castro Macedo, Bruno C. Vieira and Tyler Sandlin
Agronomy 2020, 10(6), 772; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10060772 - 29 May 2020
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 4113
Abstract
The commercial launch of dicamba-tolerant (DT) crops has resulted in increased dicamba usage and a high number of dicamba off-target movement complaints on sensitive soybeans (Glycine max L.). Dicamba is a synthetic auxin and low dosages as 0.028 g ae ha−1 [...] Read more.
The commercial launch of dicamba-tolerant (DT) crops has resulted in increased dicamba usage and a high number of dicamba off-target movement complaints on sensitive soybeans (Glycine max L.). Dicamba is a synthetic auxin and low dosages as 0.028 g ae ha−1 can induce injury on sensitive soybean. Tank contamination has been identified as one of the sources for unintended sensitive crop exposure. The labels of new dicamba formulations require a triple rinse cleanout procedure following applications. Cleanout efficacy might vary based on the sprayer type and procedure followed. This study was performed to quantify dicamba retention in commercial sprayers and assess the risk for crop injury from remaining contaminants. The results indicate triple rinse with water was comparable to cleanout procedures utilizing ammonium, commercial tank cleaners, and glyphosate in rinses. Dicamba contaminants in final rinsates resulted in <15% visual injury and no yield response when applied to sensitive soybeans at R1 stage. A survey of 25 agricultural sprayers demonstrated a cleanout efficacy of 99.996% by triple rinsing with water following applications of dicamba at 560 g ae ha−1, with concentrations of less than 1 ug mL−1 detected rinsates from the fourth rinse. A dose response experiment predicted dosages causing 5% visual injury and the yield losses were 0.1185 and 2.8525 g ae ha−1. However, symptomology was observed for all tested dosages, including the rate as low as 0.03 g ae ha−1. The results from this study suggest triple rinsing with sufficient amount of water (≥10% of tank volume) is adequate for the removal of dicamba residues from sprayers to avoid sensitive soybean damage. This study can provide producers with confidence in cleanout procedures following dicamba applications, and aid in minimizing risk for off-target movement through tank contamination. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Weed Management and Pesticide Application Technology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

1 pages, 137 KiB  
Abstract
Genotypic Effects on the Response of Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) to Sulfonylurea Herbicides
by Catherine Lawn, Andrew T. James and Mark Dieters
Proceedings 2019, 36(1), 151; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019036151 - 6 Apr 2020
Viewed by 1322
Abstract
In soybean cropping, sulfonylurea (SU) herbicides are a potentially useful alternative to glyphosate-based herbicides. Normally, soybeans are susceptible to SU herbicides, but two unlinked non-GMO genes (ALS1 and ALS2), have been identified that confer SU tolerance. In this project, we explored the effectiveness [...] Read more.
In soybean cropping, sulfonylurea (SU) herbicides are a potentially useful alternative to glyphosate-based herbicides. Normally, soybeans are susceptible to SU herbicides, but two unlinked non-GMO genes (ALS1 and ALS2), have been identified that confer SU tolerance. In this project, we explored the effectiveness of these genes in Australian soybean genetic backgrounds. Four lines, carrying both ALS1 and ALS2, were derived by backcrossing different Australian genotypes to a SU-tolerance donor line ‘W4-4’ and then using molecular markers, plants homozygous for both ALS genes were selected. The W4-4 donor and the four derived lines were evaluated in a hydroponic system at increments up to 4× the recommended field rate of metsulfuron-methyl. The ALS genes provided high levels of tolerance, with evidence of some minor interaction with the genetic background. To further test whether there was an effect of background, the five lines were crossed together in a half-diallel mating design and the resulting ten F2 populations were screened hydroponically for tolerance to metsulfuron-methyl herbicide at 4× the recommended field rate. Analyses of seedling dry weight of the five parental lines and their F2 progeny in response to the herbicide, identified differences among the crosses. These results indicated that the development of commercial varieties with maximum herbicide tolerance requires incorporation of both ALS genes, and if combined with selection in segregating populations in the presence of SU herbicide may capture additional tolerance from background genes of minor effect. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The Third International Tropical Agriculture Conference (TROPAG 2019))
14 pages, 1736 KiB  
Perspective
The Introduction of Thousands of Tonnes of Glyphosate in the food Chain—An Evaluation of Glyphosate Tolerant Soybeans
by Thomas Bøhn and Erik Millstone
Foods 2019, 8(12), 669; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods8120669 - 11 Dec 2019
Cited by 39 | Viewed by 14507
Abstract
Glyphosate-tolerant (GT) soybeans dominate the world soybean market. These plants have triggered increased use of, as well as increased residues of, glyphosate in soybean products. We present data that show farmers have doubled their glyphosate applications per season (from two to four) and [...] Read more.
Glyphosate-tolerant (GT) soybeans dominate the world soybean market. These plants have triggered increased use of, as well as increased residues of, glyphosate in soybean products. We present data that show farmers have doubled their glyphosate applications per season (from two to four) and that residues of late season spraying of glyphosate (at full bloom of the plant) result in much higher residues in the harvested plants and products. GT soybeans produced on commercial farms in the USA, Brazil and Argentina accumulate in total an estimated 2500–10,000 metric tonnes of glyphosate per year, which enter global food chains. We also review studies that have compared the quality of GT soybeans with conventional and organic soybeans. Feeding studies in Daphnia magna have shown dose-related adverse effects (mortality, reduced fecundity and delayed reproduction) of glyphosate residues in soybeans, even at glyphosate concentrations below allowed residue levels. We argue that GT soybeans need to be tested in fully representative and realistic contexts. However, the current risk assessment system has only required and received data from field trials with beans that were sprayed with much lower doses of glyphosate as compared to contemporary commercial farms. This has left knowledge gaps and a potentially serious underestimation of health risks to consumers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetically Modified Food)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop