Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (10)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = carpenter bees

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
17 pages, 5678 KB  
Article
Effects of Foraging and Provisioning Behavior on Offspring Development in the Ground Nesting Carpenter Bee Xylocopa (Proxylocopa) mongolicus (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Xylocopini)
by Xuan Liu, Chunling He, Dongshuo Yang, Le Yang, Jiabao Wei, Qianlei Dai, Jia Wan, Jialin Li, Yaheng Ma and Kaiyue Zhang
Insects 2026, 17(4), 388; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects17040388 - 2 Apr 2026
Viewed by 2175
Abstract
Understanding how pollinators adjust their behavior to maximize reproductive success in resource-limited desert ecosystems is a fundamental ecological question. In this study, we investigated X. mongolicus using a combination of field behavioral observations, pollen identification, nutritional analysis, and morphometric measurements to systematically examine [...] Read more.
Understanding how pollinators adjust their behavior to maximize reproductive success in resource-limited desert ecosystems is a fundamental ecological question. In this study, we investigated X. mongolicus using a combination of field behavioral observations, pollen identification, nutritional analysis, and morphometric measurements to systematically examine interannual variations in its flower visitation spectrum, foraging behavior, bee bread composition, and offspring body size. Our findings reveal a striking contrast: although this species exhibits polyphagy in flower visitation, it shows dietary specialization in larval nutrition—over 92% of the pollen in its bee bread originates from just two leguminous species, A. mongolicus and O. bicolor. Foraging duration increased with rising temperature and humidity, and bees adapted to strong winds by flying close to the ground. Compared with 2024, the bee bread in 2025 had lower fresh weight but higher crude protein content, and offspring body size was larger—likely due to more abundant spring rainfall in 2025, which improved the flowering performance of A. mongolicus. Collectively, these results indicate that this bee species copes with resource uncertainty in desert habitats through flexible foraging range and highly specialized food storage, with its reproductive success closely tied to the nutritional supply of key plants and precipitation patterns. This study highlights the role of precipitation timing in shaping the nutritional foundation of plant–pollinator interactions, providing a scientific basis for the conservation and management of desert pollinators. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Social Insects and Apiculture)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 7514 KB  
Article
Field Assessment of Floral Resources and Pollinator Abundance Across Six Vegetable Crops
by Lovelyn Bihnchang Ngwa, Krishnarao Gandham, Louis Ernest Jackai and Beatrice Nuck Dingha
Horticulturae 2025, 11(11), 1360; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11111360 - 12 Nov 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1562
Abstract
Pollinators play a crucial role in global biodiversity, providing essential ecosystem services such as crop pollination. However, their abundance and diversity have been gradually decreasing in recent years. Despite increasing interest in sustainable agriculture, information on vegetable crops that attract insect pollinators remains [...] Read more.
Pollinators play a crucial role in global biodiversity, providing essential ecosystem services such as crop pollination. However, their abundance and diversity have been gradually decreasing in recent years. Despite increasing interest in sustainable agriculture, information on vegetable crops that attract insect pollinators remains limited. We hypothesize that variation in floral traits among vegetable crop cultivars, especially nectar volume, nectar sugar concentration, and pollen characteristics, significantly influences visitation patterns and species composition. To test this, we evaluated multiple cultivars of six vegetable crops (cowpea, sweet potato, eggplant, green bean, mustard, and chickpea) over two years, focusing on five key pollinator groups (honey bees, bumble bees, carpenter bees, sweat bees, and wasps). Cowpea and sweet potato consistently attracted the most pollinators, whereas chickpea attracted the fewest. In 2022, nectar volume was highest in sweet potato (16.45 ± 0.37 µL) and lowest in chickpea (1.18 ± 0.75 µL). Similarly, in 2023, sweet potato recorded the highest nectar volume (8.33 ± 2.95 µL), and chickpea the lowest (0.02 ± 0.01 µL). However, chickpea (31.00 ± 1.58 °Bx) and mustard (30.10 ± 1.12 °Bx) recorded the highest nectar sugar concentration in both years, and chickpea and eggplant produced significantly more pollen grains. A significant positive correlation was observed between nectar volume and pollinator abundance. Comprehensively, this two-year study demonstrates the complex relationship between floral traits and pollinator preferences. These findings offer growers practical guidance on selecting vegetable intercrops that attract specific pollinators, thereby enhancing pollination services, supporting biodiversity, and improving the yield of pollinator-dependent crops. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Floriculture, Nursery and Landscape, and Turf)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 4931 KB  
Review
Bioinspired Drilling for Extraterrestrial Applications
by Gal-Erdene Battsengel, Noune Melkoumian, David Harvey and Rini Akmeliawati
Biomimetics 2025, 10(11), 752; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics10110752 - 7 Nov 2025
Viewed by 1579
Abstract
This review presents the novel synthesis of nature-inspired drilling strategies specifically tailored for extraterrestrial environments, where conventional technologies fail under the environmental conditions and power and mass constraints. Biomimetic drilling, inspired by insects, mollusks, reptiles, and other organisms, offers novel solutions for extraterrestrial [...] Read more.
This review presents the novel synthesis of nature-inspired drilling strategies specifically tailored for extraterrestrial environments, where conventional technologies fail under the environmental conditions and power and mass constraints. Biomimetic drilling, inspired by insects, mollusks, reptiles, and other organisms, offers novel solutions for extraterrestrial subsurface exploration. Numerous organisms efficiently penetrate materials with low energy, using little force, and adapt to flexible substrates, which are essential capabilities for use off this planet. Traditional rotary and percussive drills do not function well under microgravity, at the end of the temperature spectrum, or in low energy and mass environments, such as landers which are typically under 300 kg and 200 W of power available. Nature-inspired approaches such as the reciprocating carpenter bee style have been shown to reduce overhead forces by as much as 50%; clam-like fluidization reduces drag by 90%; and sandfish-inspired methods improve mobility in granular media by 40%. These also improve the in situ resource utilization (ISRU) approaches for efficient sampling, water ice extraction, and planetary surface operations. This paper focuses on bio-drilling with other biological models, their engineering analogs, and exploration models for off-Earth use. Based on this synthesis, the paper recommends prioritizing dual-reciprocating and oscillatory mechanisms for near-term missions, while pursuing hybrid, AI-driven, and wear-resistant designs for long-term exploration. These approaches will help to improve penetration efficiency, reduce power demands, and extend the drilling system’s lifespan in challenging extraterrestrial environments. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomimetic Approaches and Materials in Engineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 5639 KB  
Article
Nesting and Hibernation Host Preference of Bamboo Carpenter Bee, Xylocopa (Biluna) tranquebarorum tranquebarorum, and Arthropods Co-Habiting and Re-Using the Bee Nest
by Natsumi Kanzaki, Keito Kobayashi, Keiko Hamaguchi and Yuta Fujimori
Insects 2025, 16(8), 807; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16080807 - 4 Aug 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2081
Abstract
The bamboo carpenter bee, Xylocopa (Biluna) tranquebarorum tranquebarorum, is native to continental China and Taiwan, and the species invaded Japan around 2006. The bee utilizes bamboo culm for its nesting and hibernation, thereby causing structural damage to bamboo fencing and [...] Read more.
The bamboo carpenter bee, Xylocopa (Biluna) tranquebarorum tranquebarorum, is native to continental China and Taiwan, and the species invaded Japan around 2006. The bee utilizes bamboo culm for its nesting and hibernation, thereby causing structural damage to bamboo fencing and sting injuries to humans. Serious economic and ecological impacts were not expected in the early stage of its invasion. However, its distribution is rapidly expanding in Japan, and thus, its potential impacts need to be evaluated. Since the basic biology of the bee has not been examined in detail, even in its natural range, we examined the basic biology of X. t. tranquebarorum in its invasive range by evaluating its nesting preference and hibernation in several bamboo species collections in Kyoto, Japan. The field survey revealed that the bee prefers dead bamboo internodes with approximately16–28 mm of external diameter, which is well-congruent with previous studies, and does not have strict preference concerning the bamboo species, though the bee prefers Bambusa multiplex and Phyllostachys spp. in its native range. The hibernating bees in the culm sometimes share their nests with other invertebrates, including Anterhynchium gibbifrons, Dinoderus japonicus, Crematogaster matsumurai, unidentified spiders, shield bugs, and lepidopteran larvae. Within these co-habitants, the former two possibly negatively affect nesting and hibernation of the bees. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 2717 KB  
Article
Intercropping with Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L. Millsp.): An Assessment of Its Influence on the Assemblage of Pollinators and Yield of Neighbouring Non-Leguminous Crops
by Ujjwal Layek, Arijit Kundu, Nandita Das, Rajib Mondal and Prakash Karmakar
Life 2023, 13(1), 193; https://doi.org/10.3390/life13010193 - 9 Jan 2023
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 5218
Abstract
Intercropping is practiced in modern intensive agriculture considering many benefits, including additive crop yield. However, it may have competitive or facilitative interactions between pollinator-dependant crops. Here, we investigated the reproductive aspects of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan). We assessed the influence of [...] Read more.
Intercropping is practiced in modern intensive agriculture considering many benefits, including additive crop yield. However, it may have competitive or facilitative interactions between pollinator-dependant crops. Here, we investigated the reproductive aspects of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan). We assessed the influence of blooming pigeonpea on pollinator’s assemblage and the yield of neighbouring non-leguminous crops (e.g., coriander, mustard). For these, we recorded floral visitors and the yield of the targeted crops from two types of fields―closely situated and distantly situated concerning pigeonpea plantation. Pigeonpea is autogamous, but pollinator’s visits enhance fruit and seed sets. Bright, nectariferous flowers emitted several volatile organic compounds and were visited by numerous insect species. The prime pollinators of pigeonpea are carpenter bees and leafcutter bees. In contrast, halictidae, honeybees and stingless bees mainly pollinate the co-blooming non-leguminous crops (coriander and mustard). The richness and abundance of pollinators on these co-blooming crops remain similar in closely situated and distantly situated fields. As a result, the yield of the neighbouring crops is not significantly influenced by the blooming pigeonpea. Therefore, it can be concluded that planting pigeonpea in ridges of agricultural fields will be an additional agricultural output without affecting the assemblage of pollinators and yields of neighbouring co-blooming crops. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Science)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 6481 KB  
Article
Evaluation of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) in an Intercropping System as Pollinator Enhancer for Increased Crop Yield
by Beatrice N. Dingha, Paul C. Omaliko, Barbara A. Amoah, Louis E. Jackai and Deepak Shrestha
Sustainability 2021, 13(17), 9612; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179612 - 26 Aug 2021
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 4608
Abstract
Production of pollinator-dependent crops (PDCs) is increasing. However, pollinators are declining partly due to loss of floral resources. There is urgency to mitigate this decline and the potential risks to the production of PDCs and food security. One way is by promoting farming [...] Read more.
Production of pollinator-dependent crops (PDCs) is increasing. However, pollinators are declining partly due to loss of floral resources. There is urgency to mitigate this decline and the potential risks to the production of PDCs and food security. One way is by promoting farming systems that enhance flower-rich habitats. In a two-year study, Pinkeye Purple Hull and Whippoorwill cowpea varieties attractive to pollinators were intercropped with three PDCs (squash, okra, and watermelon). We evaluated whether cowpea intercrop increases the abundance and diversity of pollinators, other beneficial insects, and crop yield, and decreases the abundance of the brown marmorated stink bug (BMSB). Diverse pollinators were recorded in both years for a total of 80,379, representing seven pollinator families (Andrenidae, Apidae, Crabronidae, Formicidae, Halictidae, Tachinidae, and Vespidae) captured in pan traps, six families (Apidae, Crabronidae, Halictidae, Pyralidae, Tachinidae, and Vespidae) from sticky traps, and five pollinator types (bumble bees, carpenter bees, honeybees, butterflies and moths, and wasps) through direct visual count. Pollinator abundance and diversity was highest on the cowpea-intercropped treatments than controls. PDCs intercropped with cowpea recorded more beneficial insects than BMSB. Okra, squash, and watermelon intercrops produced 7%, 27%, and 54% more fruits than the control, respectively. Our findings indicate that intercropping cowpeas with PDCs attracted more and diverse pollinators and resulted in increased crop yield. However, to optimize pollination, factors such as planting dates to synchronize the flowering of both cowpeas and PDCs should be taken into consideration. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 3301 KB  
Article
Pollinators on Cowpea Vigna unguiculata: Implications for Intercropping to Enhance Biodiversity
by Beatrice N. Dingha, Louis E. Jackai, Barbara A. Amoah and Clement Akotsen-Mensah
Insects 2021, 12(1), 54; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12010054 - 11 Jan 2021
Cited by 18 | Viewed by 5605
Abstract
Pollinators are on the decline and loss of flower resources play a major role. This raises concerns regarding production of insect-pollinated crops and therefore food security. There is urgency to mitigate the decline through creation of farming systems that encourage flower-rich habitats. Cowpea [...] Read more.
Pollinators are on the decline and loss of flower resources play a major role. This raises concerns regarding production of insect-pollinated crops and therefore food security. There is urgency to mitigate the decline through creation of farming systems that encourage flower-rich habitats. Cowpea is a crop that produces pollen and nectar attractive to pollinators. Twenty-four cowpea varieties were planted, and the number of pollinators were counted using three sampling methods: pan traps, sticky traps, and direct visual counts. Five pollinator types (honey bees, bumble bees, carpenter bees, wasps, and butterflies and moths), 11 and 16 pollinator families were recorded from direct visual counts, pan and sticky traps, respectively. Pollinator distribution varied significantly among varieties and sampling methods, with highest number on Penny Rile (546.0 ± 38.6) and lowest (214.8 ± 29.2) in Iron and Clay. Sticky traps accounted for 45%, direct visual counts (31%), and pan traps (23%) of pollinators. Pollinators captured by pan traps were more diverse than the other methods. The relationship between number of pollinators and number of flowers was significant (r2 = 0.3; p = 0.009). Cowpea can increase resources for pollinators and could be used to improve pollinator abundance and diversity in different farming systems. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Insect Ecology, Diversity and Conservation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1408 KB  
Article
Diverse Diets with Consistent Core Microbiome in Wild Bee Pollen Provisions
by Rebecca M. Dew, Quinn S. McFrederick and Sandra M. Rehan
Insects 2020, 11(8), 499; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11080499 - 4 Aug 2020
Cited by 33 | Viewed by 5804
Abstract
Bees collect pollen from flowers for their offspring, and by doing so contribute critical pollination services for our crops and ecosystems. Unlike many managed bee species, wild bees are thought to obtain much of their microbiome from the environment. However, we know surprisingly [...] Read more.
Bees collect pollen from flowers for their offspring, and by doing so contribute critical pollination services for our crops and ecosystems. Unlike many managed bee species, wild bees are thought to obtain much of their microbiome from the environment. However, we know surprisingly little about what plant species bees visit and the microbes associated with the collected pollen. Here, we addressed the hypothesis that the pollen and microbial components of bee diets would change across the range of the bee, by amplicon sequencing pollen provisions of a widespread small carpenter bee, Ceratina calcarata, across three populations. Ceratina calcarata was found to use a diversity of floral resources across its range, but the bacterial genera associated with pollen provisions were very consistent. Acinetobacter, Erwinia, Lactobacillus, Sodalis, Sphingomonas and Wolbachia were among the top ten bacterial genera across all sites. Ceratina calcarata uses both raspberry (Rubus) and sumac (Rhus) stems as nesting substrates, however nests within these plants showed no preference for host plant pollen. Significant correlations in plant and bacterial co-occurrence differed between sites, indicating that many of the most common bacterial genera have either regional or transitory floral associations. This range-wide study suggests microbes present in brood provisions are conserved within a bee species, rather than mediated by climate or pollen composition. Moving forward, this has important implications for how these core bacteria affect larval health and whether these functions vary across space and diet. These data increase our understanding of how pollinators interact with and adjust to their changing environment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Bees and Their Symbionts)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 4064 KB  
Article
Bacterial Communities in Three Parts of Intestinal Tracts of Carpenter Bees (Xylocopa tenuiscapa)
by Phakamas Subta, Phongsathon Yodsuwan, Rujipas Yongsawas, Ammarin In-on, Natapot Warrit, Somsak Panha, Kitiphong Khongphinitbunjong, Panuwan Chantawannakul, Korrawat Attasopa and Terd Disayathanoowat
Insects 2020, 11(8), 497; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11080497 - 3 Aug 2020
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 5466
Abstract
This study investigated different bacterial communities in three intestinal parts (foregut, midgut and hindgut) of Xylocopatenuiscapa to understand the roles of gut bacteria. Our phylogenetic analysis revealed that X. tenuiscapa is closely related to Xylocopa latipes. The 16S rRNA gene in [...] Read more.
This study investigated different bacterial communities in three intestinal parts (foregut, midgut and hindgut) of Xylocopatenuiscapa to understand the roles of gut bacteria. Our phylogenetic analysis revealed that X. tenuiscapa is closely related to Xylocopa latipes. The 16S rRNA gene in the genomic DNA samples from the gut was examined by illumina (Solexa) and a total of 998 operational taxonomic unit (OTUs) clusters were found. Taxonomic classification identified 16 bacterial phyla and unclassified bacteria. The dominant bacteria taxa in the three parts of X. tenuiscapa gut were Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes and Actinobacteria. In the foregut, Lactobacillales and Enterobacteriaceae were predominantly found. The population in the midgut was similar to that in the foregut, with the addition of Gilliamella, which was also abundant. The most dominant bacteria identified in the hindgut were similar to those in the midgut and Lactobacillales, Enterobacteriaceae, Gilliamella, Bifidobacteriaceae and Flavobacteriaceae appeared in abundance. Moreover, our results suggest that a community structure of bacteria in different parts of X. tenuiscapa’s gut may be an important indicator of carpenter bees’ health. This functional study of bacterial communities revealed significant differences among the three intestinal parts and is the first report of the gut bacteria structure in solitary bees. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Bees and Their Symbionts)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1078 KB  
Review
Spatial Vision and Visually Guided Behavior in Apidae
by Almut Kelber and Hema Somanathan
Insects 2019, 10(12), 418; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects10120418 - 22 Nov 2019
Cited by 29 | Viewed by 7107
Abstract
The family Apidae, which is amongst the largest bee families, are important pollinators globally and have been well studied for their visual adaptations and visually guided behaviors. This review is a synthesis of what is known about their eyes and visual capabilities. There [...] Read more.
The family Apidae, which is amongst the largest bee families, are important pollinators globally and have been well studied for their visual adaptations and visually guided behaviors. This review is a synthesis of what is known about their eyes and visual capabilities. There are many species-specific differences, however, the relationship between body size, eye size, resolution, and sensitivity shows common patterns. Salient differences between castes and sexes are evident in important visually guided behaviors such as nest defense and mate search. We highlight that Apis mellifera and Bombus terrestris are popular bee models employed in the majority of studies that have contributed immensely to our understanding vision in bees. However, other species, specifically the tropical and many non-social Apidae, merit further investigation for a better understanding of the influence of ecological conditions on the evolution of bee vision. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Honeybee Neurobiology and Behavior)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop