Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (835)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Sars-CoV-2 pneumonia

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
36 pages, 1583 KiB  
Review
SARS-CoV-2 Pneumonia: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment
by Olga Adriana Caliman-Sturdza, Iuliana Soldanescu and Roxana Elena Gheorghita
Microorganisms 2025, 13(8), 1791; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13081791 - 31 Jul 2025
Viewed by 324
Abstract
The development of severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia is characterized by extensive lung inflammation, which, in turn, leads to respiratory distress and a decline in blood oxygen levels. Hospital admission, along with intensive care or ventilator usage, becomes necessary because this condition leads to serious [...] Read more.
The development of severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia is characterized by extensive lung inflammation, which, in turn, leads to respiratory distress and a decline in blood oxygen levels. Hospital admission, along with intensive care or ventilator usage, becomes necessary because this condition leads to serious respiratory problems. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the pathophysiological mechanisms, diagnostic methods, and current therapeutic options for pneumonia caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The pathophysiological process of severe pneumonia due to SARS-CoV-2 infection is characterized by direct lung damage from viral replication, an excessive immune system response, inflammation, impaired gas exchange, and multi-organ failure. The coexistence of various medical conditions leads to substantial lung impairment, resulting in hypoxia and respiratory failure, which can ultimately lead to fatal outcomes. The diagnosis of severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia is made through a combination of clinical, radiologic, and laboratory findings. A multifaceted approach integrating antiviral therapy, corticosteroids, oxygen supplementation, ventilatory management, and immunomodulation is imperative to control inflammation and enhance clinical outcomes. Early intervention, meticulous monitoring, and personalized care are paramount for enhancing survival and mitigating complications in critically ill patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Editorial Board Members’ Collection Series: SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 4148 KiB  
Article
Efficacy of Portable Fugitive Aerosol Mitigation Systems for Nebulizer Therapy During High-Flow Nasal Cannula and Non-Invasive Ventilation
by Adithya Shyamala Pandian, Bhavesh Patel, Karam Abi Karam, Amelia Lowell, Kelly McKay, Sabrina Jimena Mora, Piyush Hota, Gabriel Pyznar, Sandra Batchelor, Charles Peworski, David Rivas, Devang Sanghavi, Ngan Anh Nguyen, Aliaa Eltantawy, Xueqi Li, Xiaojun Xian, Michael Serhan and Erica Forzani
Emerg. Care Med. 2025, 2(3), 36; https://doi.org/10.3390/ecm2030036 - 29 Jul 2025
Viewed by 345
Abstract
Objectives: This study evaluates the efficacy of existing and new aerosol mitigation methods during nebulization (Neb) in combination with high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen supplementation and non-invasive ventilation (NIV). Methods: We recorded fugitive aerosol particle concentrations over time and assessed the peak (P) [...] Read more.
Objectives: This study evaluates the efficacy of existing and new aerosol mitigation methods during nebulization (Neb) in combination with high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen supplementation and non-invasive ventilation (NIV). Methods: We recorded fugitive aerosol particle concentrations over time and assessed the peak (P) and area (A) efficacy of active and passive mitigation methods, comparing them to a no-mitigation condition. Peak efficacy was measured by the reduction in maximum aerosol concentration, while area efficacy was quantified by the reduction of the area under the aerosol concentration–time curve. Results: For HFNC with Neb, we found that active mitigation using a mask with a biofilter and a fan (referred to as the aerosol barrier mask) significantly outperformed passive mitigation with a face mask. The peak and area efficacy for aerosol reduction were 99.0% and 96.4% for active mitigation and 35.9% and 7.6% for passive mitigation, respectively. For NIV with Neb, the active mitigation method, using a box with a biofilter and fan, also outperformed passive mitigation using only the box. The peak and area efficacy for aerosol reduction were 92.1% and 85.5% for active mitigation and 53.7.0% and 25.4% for passive mitigation, respectively. Conclusion: We concluded that active mitigation set up systems advantageous for effective reduction of airborne aerosols during aerosol generated procedures. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

12 pages, 4562 KiB  
Article
Human Gliomedin and Ryanodine 3 Type Receptor Is the Key to Explain the Guillain Barre Syndrome in SARS-CoV-2 and Others Bacterial Related to SARS-CoV-2 Postinfection? A Molecular Mimicry Point of View
by Gustavo Alberto Obando-Pereda and Luis Alberto Ponce-Soto
Immuno 2025, 5(3), 28; https://doi.org/10.3390/immuno5030028 - 17 Jul 2025
Viewed by 352
Abstract
Guillain-Barre syndrome is an autoimmune disease that provokes neural illness causing acute paralysis neuropathy. This syndrome appears after some bacterial infections produced by Campylobacter jejuni, Streptococcus pyogenes, S. pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenciae, E. coli and current studies showed the appears [...] Read more.
Guillain-Barre syndrome is an autoimmune disease that provokes neural illness causing acute paralysis neuropathy. This syndrome appears after some bacterial infections produced by Campylobacter jejuni, Streptococcus pyogenes, S. pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenciae, E. coli and current studies showed the appears of this syndrome after SARS-CoV-2 infection. In this study, a in silico analysis was carry out in which to determinate bacterial epitopes than produce the molecule mimicry phenomena and that can produce the immune system activation against this epitope. A conserved amino acid sequence has been encountered with the highest probability to activate the immune system against this bacterial epitope, human gliomedin and ryanodine 3 type receptor. More studies needed to demonstrate in vivo the molecular mimicry in Guillain-Barre syndrome patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Immunopathology and Immunohistology)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

22 pages, 4670 KiB  
Article
3,3′-Diindolylmethane Improves the Viral Pneumonia Outcomes After Influenza and SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Animal Models
by Vsevolod Kiselev, Irina Leneva, Anna Ivanina, Artem Poromov, Irina Falynskova, Nadezhda Kartashova, Ekaterina Glubokova, Galina Trunova, Sergey Sudakov, Vadim Drukh, Vitaly Zverev and Oleg Kiselev
Viruses 2025, 17(7), 964; https://doi.org/10.3390/v17070964 - 9 Jul 2025
Viewed by 455
Abstract
Influenza and SARS-CoV-2 are often associated with viral pneumonia, resulting from direct exposure of the virus to lung tissue. 3,3′-Diindolylmethane (DIM) is a naturally occurring substance with multi-target activity, including anti-inflammatory and epigenetic modulation. In this study, we evaluated the therapeutic efficacy in [...] Read more.
Influenza and SARS-CoV-2 are often associated with viral pneumonia, resulting from direct exposure of the virus to lung tissue. 3,3′-Diindolylmethane (DIM) is a naturally occurring substance with multi-target activity, including anti-inflammatory and epigenetic modulation. In this study, we evaluated the therapeutic efficacy in vivo of a DIM formulation with fish oil (Cesarox Epi) against influenza A (H1N1) infection in mice and against SARS-CoV-2 infection in Syrian hamsters. In a model of lethal influenza pneumonia induced by A/California/04/2009 (H1N1)pdm09 virus, we showed that 5 days’ treatment with DIM Epi at 10, 20, and 60 mg/kg/day delayed the time to death, prevented body weight loss, and resulted in significant improvements in survival. DIM Epi tested in hamsters infected with SARS-CoV2 Dubrovka (Wuhan-like) strain at doses 50 and 100 mg/kg/day reduced clinical signs, weight loss, temperature elevation, and lung pathology. In both models of infections, treatment with DIM Epi did not significantly decrease viral titer in the animals’ lungs. DIM Epi and Oseltamivir were more effective against influenza infection when given in combination than given singly, while co-administration of DIM Epi with Molnupiravir did not yield an additive benefit against SARS-CoV-2 infection. These findings support DIM Epi as a promising host-directed adjunct therapy for viral pneumonia with potential to enhance outcomes in respiratory infections. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Coronaviruses)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1225 KiB  
Article
Pneumothorax and Pneumomediastinum in SARS-CoV-2 Infection
by Cătălina Aldea, Irina Mihaela Abdulan, Bogdan Mihnea Ciuntu, Robert Negru and Cătălina Mihaela Luca
Medicina 2025, 61(7), 1182; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61071182 - 29 Jun 2025
Viewed by 389
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Infection with SARS-CoV-2, the etiologic agent of Coronavirus 2019, spread rapidly globally after the first case was reported in Wuhan, China. Multiple respiratory complications, including pneumothorax and pneumomediastinum, have been observed. This study presents an analysis of 100 patients diagnosed [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Infection with SARS-CoV-2, the etiologic agent of Coronavirus 2019, spread rapidly globally after the first case was reported in Wuhan, China. Multiple respiratory complications, including pneumothorax and pneumomediastinum, have been observed. This study presents an analysis of 100 patients diagnosed with these conditions in the context of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted between March 2020 and February 2021 and included patients from two hospital units designated for the management of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Demographic data, laboratory investigation results, imaging assessments, medical-surgical management strategies, and survival data were recorded. Results: The study included 100 patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (mechanically ventilated and non-ventilated). Of these, 57 patients presented with pneumothorax, 26 of whom also had associated pneumomediastinum and 43 of whom were diagnosed with pneumomediastinum alone. There was a higher incidence of pneumothorax among male patients. Also, 22 patients had concomitant subcutaneous emphysema. Regarding therapeutic management, 36 pleural drains were performed. Bilateral pneumothorax was identified in five patients. Conclusions: The presence of pneumothorax was correlated with a decreased survival rate among patients diagnosed with COVID-19. Also, performing pleural drainage in patients with pneumothorax and COVID-19 pneumonia did not significantly influence the prognosis of the underlying disease. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Epidemiology & Public Health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1700 KiB  
Article
Delayed Viral Clearance Accompanied by Early Impaired Humoral and Virus-Specific T-Cell Response in Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 and Interstitial Lung Disease
by Jiaying Zhong, Juan Li, Rui Wei, Bingpeng Guo, Tingting Cui, Peiyu Huang, Zhongfang Wang, Qun Luo and Qian Han
Vaccines 2025, 13(6), 655; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13060655 - 19 Jun 2025
Viewed by 496
Abstract
Objectives: Patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection are at high risk of severe coronavirus disease 2019. It is unclear whether anti-viral cellular and humoral immunity is impacted in patients with ILD in the presence [...] Read more.
Objectives: Patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection are at high risk of severe coronavirus disease 2019. It is unclear whether anti-viral cellular and humoral immunity is impacted in patients with ILD in the presence of immune disorders and immunosuppressive therapy. This results in poor control of viral infections following SARS-CoV-2 infection. We aimed to highlight the clinical management of patients with ILD with regard to the adjustment of anti-inflammatory therapy during SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods: We compared viral clearance, antibody levels, and T-cell immune response between healthy controls and patients with connective tissue disease-related ILD (CTD-ILD) or interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF). Results: Patients with ILD exhibited a higher viral load than the control group (1.58 × 106 vs. 2.37 × 103 copies/mL, p = 0.018), as well as a significantly lower level of neutralizing antibodies against the wild-type (WT) virus (7.01 vs. 625.6, p < 0.0001) and Omicron BA.5 (7.19 vs. 128.4, p < 0.001). Similarly, a lower virus-specific T-cell (VST) immune response was observed 14 days post-symptom onset in the ILD group (CD4+ VSTs: 0.018 vs. 0.082, p = 0.005; CD8+ VSTs: 0.0008 vs. 0.047, p = 0.004). The ILD group had no other heightened inflammatory biomarkers compared with the control group. Conclusions: Our study provides novel evidence of the underlying interaction between virus clearance and host immune status and sheds light on the clinical management of patients with ILD with regard to the adjustment of anti-inflammatory therapy during SARS-CoV-2 infection. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section COVID-19 Vaccines and Vaccination)
Show Figures

Figure 1

29 pages, 109956 KiB  
Review
In Silico Development of SARS-CoV-2 Non-Covalent Mpro Inhibitors: A Review
by Islam Alagawani and Feng Wang
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(12), 6544; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15126544 - 10 Jun 2025
Viewed by 592
Abstract
Coronaviruses (CoVs) have recently emerged as significant causes of respiratory disease outbreaks, with the novel coronavirus pneumonia of 2019, known as COVID-19, being highly infectious and triggered by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Understanding virus–host interactions and molecular targets in host [...] Read more.
Coronaviruses (CoVs) have recently emerged as significant causes of respiratory disease outbreaks, with the novel coronavirus pneumonia of 2019, known as COVID-19, being highly infectious and triggered by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Understanding virus–host interactions and molecular targets in host cell death signalling is crucial for inhibitor development. Among the promising targets for inhibitor development is the main protease (Mpro), which is essential for viral replication. While current research has focused mainly on covalent inhibitors, growing attention is being given to non-covalent inhibitors due to their potential for lower toxicity and improved resistance to viral mutations. This literature review provides an in-depth analysis of recent in silico approaches used to identify and optimise non-covalent inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 Mpro. It focuses on molecular docking and robust molecular dynamics (MD) simulation technologies to discover novel scaffolds with better binding affinities. The article summarises recent studies that pre-screened several potential non-covalent inhibitors, including natural constituents like alkaloids, flavonoids, terpenoids, diarylheptanoids, and anthraquinones, using in silico methods. The in silico approach, pivotal to developing small molecules of Mpro non-covalent inhibitors, provides an efficient avenue to guide future research efforts toward developing high-performance Mpro inhibitors for SARS-CoV-2 Mpro, representing the latest advancements in drug design. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Chemical and Molecular Sciences)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1237 KiB  
Article
Serological Surveillance of Betacoronaviruses in Bat Guano Collectors: Pre-COVID-19 Pandemic and Post-SARS-CoV-2 Emergence
by Sasiprapa Ninwattana, Spencer L. Sterling, Khwankamon Rattanatumhi, Nattakarn Thippamom, Piyapha Hirunpatrawong, Pakamas Sangsub, Thaniwan Cheun-Arom, Dominic Esposito, Chee Wah Tan, Wee Chee Yap, Feng Zhu, Lin-Fa Wang, Eric D. Laing, Supaporn Wacharapluesadee and Opass Putcharoen
Viruses 2025, 17(6), 837; https://doi.org/10.3390/v17060837 - 10 Jun 2025
Viewed by 1112
Abstract
Community-based serosurveillance for emerging zoonotic viruses can provide a powerful and cost-effective measurement of cryptic spillovers. Betacoronaviruses, including SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV, are known to infect bats and can cause severe respiratory illness in humans, yet remain under-surveyed in high-risk populations. This study [...] Read more.
Community-based serosurveillance for emerging zoonotic viruses can provide a powerful and cost-effective measurement of cryptic spillovers. Betacoronaviruses, including SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV, are known to infect bats and can cause severe respiratory illness in humans, yet remain under-surveyed in high-risk populations. This study aimed to determine the seroprevalence of betacoronaviruses in an occupational cohort in contact with bats before and after the emergence of SARS-CoV-2. Serum samples from pre- and post-COVID-19 pandemic were screened using antigen-based multiplex microsphere immunoassays (MMIAs) and a multiplex surrogate virus neutralization test (sVNT). Pre-pandemic samples showed no SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, while post-pandemic samples from vaccinated participants displayed binding and neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 and a related bat CoV. Furthermore, one participant (1/237, 0.43%) had persistent antibodies against MERS-CoV in 2017, 2018 and 2021 but was seronegative in 2023, despite reporting no history of traveling abroad or severe pneumonia. The observed sustained antibody levels indicate a possible exposure to MERS-CoV or a MERS-CoV-like virus, although the etiology and clinical relevance of this finding remains unclear. Ongoing surveillance in high-risk populations remains crucial for understanding virus epidemiology and mitigating zoonotic transmission risk. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Coronaviruses)
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 2120 KiB  
Case Report
Low-Dose Radiotherapy for Severe COVID-19 Lung Disease—Have Meta-Analyses Accounted for Dose and Timing of Radiotherapy?
by Leonie Eastlake, Prakash Thanikachalam, David Cameron, Dimitri Dimitroyannis, Wanda Ingham, Pascoe Mannion, Gillian Clarkson, Aashish Vyas, Anthony Chalmers and Dennis Hadjiyiannakis
Radiation 2025, 5(2), 19; https://doi.org/10.3390/radiation5020019 - 8 Jun 2025
Viewed by 649
Abstract
Low-dose radiotherapy had historically been used to treat both bacterial and viral pneumonias. In the present day, this is not in use due to the development of antibiotics and other supportive measures as well as a concern regarding late radiation toxicities. COVID-19 presented [...] Read more.
Low-dose radiotherapy had historically been used to treat both bacterial and viral pneumonias. In the present day, this is not in use due to the development of antibiotics and other supportive measures as well as a concern regarding late radiation toxicities. COVID-19 presented us with a novel respiratory illness without a strong evidence-based best practice; it was thought, therefore, that there may be a role for low-dose radiotherapy in the absence or failure of a standard treatment. The rationale for this was based around the ability of low-dose radiation to reduce an inflammatory state. We treated two individuals suffering from severe COVID-19 with low-dose whole lung radiotherapy, in the setting of a phase I trial. Both patients improved clinically, biochemically, and radiologically within a matter of days. We discuss why the meta-analyses may not have shown this advantage. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 193 KiB  
Article
Characteristics of Hospitalized Elderly Patients with Severe Pneumonia Due to SARS-CoV-2, Vaccinated Against COVID-19
by Jakub Kisiel, Michał Chojnicki, Arleta Kowala-Piaskowska, Katarzyna Wieczorowska-Tobis, Sławomir Tobis, Urszula Religioni, Piotr Merks and Agnieszka Neumann-Podczaska
Life 2025, 15(6), 879; https://doi.org/10.3390/life15060879 - 29 May 2025
Viewed by 696
Abstract
The introduction of COVID-19 vaccinations has significantly altered the course of the pandemic by markedly reducing the number of severe infection cases, hospitalizations, and deaths due to COVID-19. Elderly individuals constitute a particularly vulnerable group at risk of severe disease progression, which is [...] Read more.
The introduction of COVID-19 vaccinations has significantly altered the course of the pandemic by markedly reducing the number of severe infection cases, hospitalizations, and deaths due to COVID-19. Elderly individuals constitute a particularly vulnerable group at risk of severe disease progression, which is often related to decreased immune system effectiveness and comorbidities. Severe infection outcomes in vaccinated individuals, though substantially rarer than in the unimmunized population, can still lead to death due to underlying health conditions. This analysis aims to describe the population of elderly individuals who, despite being vaccinated, died from interstitial pneumonia complicating SARS-CoV-2 infection. Data on the infection course and co-existing diseases were obtained from the database of the Józef Struś Multispecialty City Hospital in Poznań, which was converted into a dedicated facility during the pandemic. The inclusion criteria for the analysis were being over 60 years of age on the day of hospital admission, confirmed pneumonia in radiological examination, COVID-19 infection confirmed by PCR test, and an adverse disease course resulting in death. Patients admitted to the hospital from 1 June 2021 to 31 December 2021 were analyzed. Out of all hospitalizations, only 18 individuals met the inclusion criteria. Given the small number of patients, the authors employed descriptive methods to illustrate the clinical states of the individual patients, presenting SARS-CoV-2 infection in the context of co-existing diseases that significantly affect prognosis. The qualitative analysis employed highlights the complex and multidimensional courses of severely ill COVID-19 patients more emphatically. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Human Health Before, During, and After COVID-19)
25 pages, 1428 KiB  
Article
Incidence and Risk Factors of Secondary Infections in Critically Ill SARS-CoV-2 Patients: A Retrospective Study in an Intensive Care Unit
by Mircea Stoian, Leonard Azamfirei, Adina Andone, Anca-Meda Văsieșiu, Andrei Stîngaciu, Adina Huțanu, Sergio Rareș Bândilă, Daniela Dobru, Andrei Manea and Adina Stoian
Biomedicines 2025, 13(6), 1333; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13061333 - 29 May 2025
Viewed by 659
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The clinical forms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vary widely in severity, ranging from asymptomatic or moderate cases to severe pneumonia that can lead to acute respiratory failure, acute respiratory distress syndrome, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, and death. Our main objective [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: The clinical forms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vary widely in severity, ranging from asymptomatic or moderate cases to severe pneumonia that can lead to acute respiratory failure, acute respiratory distress syndrome, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, and death. Our main objective was to determine the prevalence of bacterial and fungal secondary infections in an intensive care unit (ICU). Secondary objectives included analyzing the impact of these infections on mortality and medical resource utilization, as well as assessing antimicrobial resistance in this context. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study that included critically ill severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) patients treated in an ICU and analyzed the prevalence of co-infections and superinfections. Results: A multivariate analysis of mortality found that the presence of superinfections increased the odds of death by more than 15-fold, while the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and C-reactive protein (adjusted for confounders) increased the odds of mortality by 51% and 13%, respectively. The antibiotic resistance profile of microorganisms indicated a high prevalence of resistant strains. Carbapenems, glycopeptides, and oxazolidinones were the most frequently used classes of antibiotics. Among patients, 27.9% received a single antibiotic, 47.5% received two from different classes, and 24.4% were treated with three or more. Conclusions: The incidence and spectrum of bacterial and fungal superinfections are higher in critically ill ICU patients, leading to worse outcomes in COVID-19 cases. Multidrug-resistant pathogens present significant challenges for ICU and public health settings. Early screening, accurate diagnosis, and minimal use of invasive devices are essential to reduce risks and improve patient outcomes. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 226 KiB  
Article
Severity of Respiratory Viral Diseases and the Impacts of Underlying Medical Conditions During the Omicron Subvariant Dominant Epidemics—A Comparative Study of SARS-CoV-2, Influenza Virus and Respiratory Syncytial Virus
by Yu Jung Choi, Joon Young Song, Seong-Heon Wie, Won Suk Choi, Jacob Lee, Jin-Soo Lee, Young Keun Kim, Shin Woo Kim, Sun Hee Lee, Kyung-Hwa Park, Hye Won Jeong, Jin Gu Yoon, Hye Seong, Eliel Nham, Ji Yun Noh, Hee Jin Cheong and Woo Joo Kim
Pathogens 2025, 14(6), 543; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14060543 - 29 May 2025
Viewed by 747
Abstract
After the transition of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) from a pandemic to an endemic phase, data on respiratory viral infections remain limited. This study compared the clinical outcomes of SARS-CoV-2, influenza virus (INFV), and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infections and investigated how underlying [...] Read more.
After the transition of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) from a pandemic to an endemic phase, data on respiratory viral infections remain limited. This study compared the clinical outcomes of SARS-CoV-2, influenza virus (INFV), and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infections and investigated how underlying medical conditions influence disease severity. During Omicron subvariant dominant periods, we conducted a multicenter, retrospective cohort study including laboratory-confirmed cases of SARS-CoV-2, INFV, and RSV infections in hospitalized patients aged ≥ 19 years. We compared demographic characteristics and clinical outcomes and analyzed the association between underlying comorbidities and severity of infection. A total of 1850 cases with SARS-CoV-2, 98 with INFV, and 63 with RSV infections were analyzed. Notable differences in the occurrence of fever, cough, sputum, and dyspnea were observed among patients with the three different viral infections. Pneumonia was diagnosed more frequently in patients with RSV infection (65.6%) compared to those with INFV infection (42.9%) and SARS-CoV-2 (34.4%) (p < 0.01). For patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection, the risk of pneumonia increased by 47% in the moderate-risk group and 37% in the high-risk group. Among hospitalized patients, pneumonia was more frequently identified in patients with RSV infection, with statistical significance. Furthermore, the presence of medical conditions significantly increased the risk of developing pneumonia. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Viral Pathogens)
14 pages, 775 KiB  
Article
Bacterial Superinfections After SARS-CoV-2 Pneumonia: Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns, Impact on Inflammatory Profiles, Severity Scores, and Clinical Outcomes
by Petrinela Daliu, Iulia Bogdan, Ovidiu Rosca, Alexandra Laura Aelenei, Ioan Sîrbu, Mihai Calin Bica, Monica Licker, Elena Hogea and Delia Muntean
Diseases 2025, 13(5), 145; https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases13050145 - 9 May 2025
Viewed by 643
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Secondary bacterial pneumonia can substantially worsen the clinical trajectory of patients hospitalized for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). This study aimed to characterize bacterial superinfections in COVID-19, including pathogen profiles, resistance patterns, inflammatory responses, severity scores, and ICU admission risk. Methods: [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Secondary bacterial pneumonia can substantially worsen the clinical trajectory of patients hospitalized for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). This study aimed to characterize bacterial superinfections in COVID-19, including pathogen profiles, resistance patterns, inflammatory responses, severity scores, and ICU admission risk. Methods: In a retrospective cohort design, we reviewed 141 patients admitted to a single tertiary-care hospital between February 2021 and December 2024. A total of 58 patients had laboratory-confirmed bacterial superinfection by sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage, or blood cultures (superinfection group), whereas 83 had COVID-19 without any documented bacterial pathogens (COVID-only group). We collected detailed microbiological data from sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), and blood cultures. Antibiotic sensitivity testing was performed using standard breakpoints for multidrug resistance (MDR). Inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and systemic immune-inflammation index) and the severity indices Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, Confusion, Urea, Respiratory rate, Blood pressure (CURB), and National Early Warning Score (NEWS) were measured at admission. Primary outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mechanical ventilation, and mortality. Results: Patients in the superinfection group showed significantly elevated inflammatory markers and severity scores compared to the COVID-only group (mean APACHE II of 17.2 vs. 13.8; p < 0.001). Pathogens most frequently isolated from sputum and BAL included Klebsiella pneumoniae (27.6%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (20.7%). Multidrug-resistant strains were documented in 32.8% of isolates. The superinfection group had higher ICU admissions (37.9% vs. 19.3%; p = 0.01) and more frequent mechanical ventilation (25.9% vs. 9.6%; p = 0.01). Mortality trended higher among superinfected patients (15.5% vs. 7.2%; p = 0.09). A total of 34% of the cohort had prior antibiotic use, which independently predicted MDR (aOR 2.6, p = 0.01). The presence of MDR pathogens such as Klebsiella pneumoniae (OR 2.8), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (OR 2.5), and Staphylococcus aureus (OR 2.1) significantly increases the risk of ICU admission. Conclusions: Bacterial superinfection exacerbates inflammation and worsens outcomes in COVID-19 patients, such as a higher risk of ICU admission. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 6481 KiB  
Article
Impact of SARS-CoV-2 P.1 Variant Infection on the Nasopharyngeal Commensal Bacterial Microbiome of Individuals from the Brazilian Amazon
by Amanda Mendes Silva Cruz, Jedson Ferreira Cardoso, Kenny Costa Pinheiro, Jessylene Almeida Ferreira, Luana Soares Barbagelata, Sandro Patroca Silva, Wanderley Dias Chagas Junior, Patrícia Santos Lobo, Dielle Monteiro Teixeira, Walter André Junior, Inaiah Ordenes Silva, Mirleide Cordeiro Santos, Luana Silva Soares Farias, Maisa Silva Sousa and Fernando Neto Tavares
Microorganisms 2025, 13(5), 1088; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13051088 - 8 May 2025
Viewed by 718
Abstract
It is important to understand which bacterial taxa are most abundant during SARS-CoV-2 infection and to promote mitigation strategies for conditions subsequent to infection. Nasopharyngeal swab samples were collected from patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 and their family contacts (uninfected and asymptomatic) during the [...] Read more.
It is important to understand which bacterial taxa are most abundant during SARS-CoV-2 infection and to promote mitigation strategies for conditions subsequent to infection. Nasopharyngeal swab samples were collected from patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 and their family contacts (uninfected and asymptomatic) during the outbreak of the P.1 variant of SARS-CoV-2 in Parintins, Amazonas–Brazil, in March 2021. The samples were investigated by a shotgun sequencing metagenomic approach using the NextSeq 500 Illumina® system. The samples were stratified according to the presence or absence of SARS-CoV-2, household group, sex, and age. Of the total of 63 individuals, 37 (58.73%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2 and 26 (41.27%) were negative for SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory viruses (FLU, AdV, HBoV, HCoV, HMPV, RSV, PIV, HRV). The alpha diversity indexes Chao1, species observed, Simpson, and Inv Simpson demonstrated a significant difference (p < 0.05) in both the diversity of observed species and the abundance of some taxa between positive and negative individuals. We also observed an abundance of opportunists such as Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus spp, and Shigella sonnei, previously associated with the severity of COVID-19. Our results suggest that SARS-CoV-2 infection causes changes in the microenvironment of the nasopharyngeal region, allowing greater proliferation of opportunistic bacteria and decreased abundance of commensal bacteria. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Virology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1631 KiB  
Article
SpO2/FiO2 Correlates with PaO2/FiO2 (P/F) and Radiological Biomarkers of Severity: A Retrospective Study on COVID-19 Pneumonia Patients
by Alberto Marra, Vito D’Agnano, Raffaella Pagliaro, Fabio Perrotta, Ilaria Di Fiore, Antonio D’Orologio, Filippo Scialò, Angela Schiattarella, Andrea Bianco and Roberto Parrella
Biomedicines 2025, 13(5), 1072; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13051072 - 28 Apr 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 445
Abstract
Background: In patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, the estimation of PaO2 represents the method of choice for monitoring a patient’s oxygenation status and assessing disease severity. The aim of this study is, therefore, to investigate the correlation between SpO2/FiO2 and [...] Read more.
Background: In patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, the estimation of PaO2 represents the method of choice for monitoring a patient’s oxygenation status and assessing disease severity. The aim of this study is, therefore, to investigate the correlation between SpO2/FiO2 and PaO2/FiO2, as well as radiological and laboratory biomarkers of severity. Methods: In this monocentric observational, analytical, retrospective large cohort study, consecutive patients with a confirmed diagnosis of pneumonia from SARS-CoV-2, hospitalized at the Cotugno Hospital—AORN dei Colli—of Naples, between 1 September 2020 and 28 February 2022 were considered for study inclusion. Patients with missing data were excluded. Results: We included 585 patients (median age 63 [22–95]). Mean PaO2/FiO2 was 203 [66–433], whilst mean SpO2/FiO2 was 240 [81–471]. We found that P/F ratio could be predicted from S/F ratio, as described by the linear regression equation (P/F = 13.273 + 0.790 × S/F). In addition, we found that SpO2/FiO2 ratio significantly correlated with HRCT score and laboratory markers of severity, including IL-6, D-Dimer, and NLR. Conclusions: SpO2/FiO2 ratio represents a highly useful resource as a valid surrogate of P/F ratio in patients with COVID pneumonia, also correlating with other biomarkers of severity, such as HRCT score and key laboratory markers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Lung Cancer: From Bench to Bedside)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop