Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (560)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = MRI of prostate

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
15 pages, 281 KiB  
Article
Single-Center Comparative Evaluation of Freehand Transperineal and Transrectal Prostate Biopsy Techniques Performed Under Local Anesthesia
by Laurian Ștefan Maxim, Ruxandra Maria Rotaru, Camelia Cornelia Scârneciu, Marius Alexandru Moga, Florin Lucian Petrică Sabou, Anda Catica Hogea, Raul Dumitru Gherasim, Alexandru Ghicavîi, Razvan-Dragos Mulțescu, Mihail-Alexandru Badea, Bogdan Ovidiu Feciche and Ioan Scârneciu
Diagnostics 2025, 15(15), 1929; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15151929 (registering DOI) - 31 Jul 2025
Abstract
Background: To diagnose prostate cancer, a prostate biopsy is required. Two methods are commonly used for biopsy: transrectal and transperineal. The transperineal approach, particularly the “freehand” technique under local anesthesia, offers better access to the anterior prostate, lower infection risk, and higher detection [...] Read more.
Background: To diagnose prostate cancer, a prostate biopsy is required. Two methods are commonly used for biopsy: transrectal and transperineal. The transperineal approach, particularly the “freehand” technique under local anesthesia, offers better access to the anterior prostate, lower infection risk, and higher detection rates. Methods: This retrospective study examined the records of 1674 patients who underwent ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies between 2015 and 2022. Of these, 1161 patients had transperineal biopsy using the “freehand” method, and 513 had transrectal biopsy. All the biopsies were carried out under local anesthesia, with a combined systematic and targeted approach for patients with MRI-identified lesions. Results: This study demonstrates that the transperineal biopsy approach significantly increased the detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer compared with the transrectal method, with detection rates of 65.7% and 59.4%, respectively. Notably, the transperineal technique also achieved superior detection of anteriorly located tumors (94.1% vs. 43.1%), supporting its use as the preferred biopsy strategy, particularly in anatomically challenging regions. Moreover, patients who underwent transperineal biopsy demonstrated more favorable diagnostic outcomes, characterized by a higher detection rate for clinically significant cancers and a reduced incidence of clinically insignificant cases. The transperineal method outperformed the transrectal approach, especially among younger patients and those presenting with lower PSA values. These results highlight the diagnostic superiority and broader clinical applicability of the transperineal biopsy technique across various patient subgroups. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Prostate Cancer Imaging and Biopsy Techniques)
15 pages, 2220 KiB  
Article
Radiologic Assessment of Periprostatic Fat as an Indicator of Prostate Cancer Risk on Multiparametric MRI
by Roxana Iacob, Emil Radu Iacob, Emil Robert Stoicescu, Diana Manolescu, Laura Andreea Ghenciu, Radu Căprariu, Amalia Constantinescu, Iulia Ciobanu, Răzvan Bardan and Alin Cumpănaș
Bioengineering 2025, 12(8), 831; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12080831 (registering DOI) - 31 Jul 2025
Abstract
Prostate cancer remains one of the most prevalent malignancies among men, and emerging evidence proposed a potential role for periprostatic adipose tissue (PPAT) in tumor progression. However, its relationship with imaging-based risk stratification systems such as PI-RADS remains uncertain. This retrospective observational study [...] Read more.
Prostate cancer remains one of the most prevalent malignancies among men, and emerging evidence proposed a potential role for periprostatic adipose tissue (PPAT) in tumor progression. However, its relationship with imaging-based risk stratification systems such as PI-RADS remains uncertain. This retrospective observational study aimed to evaluate whether periprostatic and subcutaneous fat thickness are associated with PI-RADS scores or PSA levels in biopsy-naïve patients. We retrospectively reviewed 104 prostate MRI scans performed between January 2020 and January 2024. Fat thickness was measured on axial T2-weighted images, and statistical analyses were conducted using Spearman’s correlation and multiple linear regression. In addition to linear measurements, we also assessed periprostatic fat volume and posterior fat thickness derived from imaging data. No significant correlations were observed between fat thickness (either periprostatic or subcutaneous) and PI-RADS score or PSA values. Similarly, periprostatic fat volume showed only a weak, non-significant correlation with PI-RADS, while posterior fat thickness demonstrated a weak but statistically significant positive association. Additionally, subgroup comparisons between low-risk (PI-RADS < 4) and high-risk (PI-RADS ≥ 4) patients showed no meaningful differences in fat measurements. These findings suggest that simple linear fat thickness measurements may not enhance imaging-based risk assessment in prostate cancer, though regional and volumetric assessments could offer modest added value. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Label-Free Cancer Detection)
Show Figures

Figure 1

2 pages, 1846 KiB  
Correction
Correction: Chen et al. Multivariate Framework of Metabolism in Advanced Prostate Cancer Using Whole Abdominal and Pelvic Hyperpolarized 13C MRI—A Correlative Study with Clinical Outcomes. Cancers 2025, 17, 2211
by Hsin-Yu Chen, Ivan de Kouchkovsky, Robert A. Bok, Michael A. Ohliger, Zhen J. Wang, Daniel Gebrezgiabhier, Tanner Nickles, Lucas Carvajal, Jeremy W. Gordon, Peder E. Z. Larson, John Kurhanewicz, Rahul Aggarwal and Daniel B. Vigneron
Cancers 2025, 17(15), 2511; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17152511 - 30 Jul 2025
Viewed by 24
Abstract
In the original publication [...] Full article
Show Figures

Figure 2

19 pages, 1282 KiB  
Article
The Role of Radiomic Analysis and Different Machine Learning Models in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis
by Eleni Bekou, Ioannis Seimenis, Athanasios Tsochatzis, Karafyllia Tziagkana, Nikolaos Kelekis, Savas Deftereos, Nikolaos Courcoutsakis, Michael I. Koukourakis and Efstratios Karavasilis
J. Imaging 2025, 11(8), 250; https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging11080250 - 23 Jul 2025
Viewed by 274
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common malignancy in men. Precise grading is crucial for the effective treatment approaches of PCa. Machine learning (ML) applied to biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (bpMRI) radiomics holds promise for improving PCa diagnosis and prognosis. This study investigated [...] Read more.
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common malignancy in men. Precise grading is crucial for the effective treatment approaches of PCa. Machine learning (ML) applied to biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (bpMRI) radiomics holds promise for improving PCa diagnosis and prognosis. This study investigated the efficiency of seven ML models to diagnose the different PCa grades, changing the input variables. Our studied sample comprised 214 men who underwent bpMRI in different imaging centers. Seven ML algorithms were compared using radiomic features extracted from T2-weighted (T2W) and diffusion-weighted (DWI) MRI, with and without the inclusion of Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) values. The performance of the models was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The models’ performance was strongly dependent on the input parameters. Radiomic features derived from T2WI and DWI, whether used independently or in combination, demonstrated limited clinical utility, with AUC values ranging from 0.703 to 0.807. However, incorporating the PSA index significantly improved the models’ efficiency, regardless of lesion location or degree of malignancy, resulting in AUC values ranging from 0.784 to 1.00. There is evidence that ML methods, in combination with radiomic analysis, can contribute to solving differential diagnostic problems of prostate cancers. Also, optimization of the analysis method is critical, according to the results of our study. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Medical Imaging)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 12298 KiB  
Article
Impact of Metastatic Microenvironment on Physiology and Metabolism of Small Cell Neuroendocrine Prostate Cancer Patient-Derived Xenografts
by Shubhangi Agarwal, Deepti Upadhyay, Jinny Sun, Emilie Decavel-Bueff, Robert A. Bok, Romelyn Delos Santos, Said Al Muzhahimi, Rosalie Nolley, Jason Crane, John Kurhanewicz, Donna M. Peehl and Renuka Sriram
Cancers 2025, 17(14), 2385; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17142385 - 18 Jul 2025
Viewed by 367
Abstract
Background: Potent androgen receptor pathway inhibitors induce small cell neuroendocrine prostate cancer (SCNC), a highly aggressive subtype of metastatic androgen deprivation-resistant prostate cancer (ARPC) with limited treatment options and poor survival rates. Patients with metastases in the liver have a poor prognosis relative [...] Read more.
Background: Potent androgen receptor pathway inhibitors induce small cell neuroendocrine prostate cancer (SCNC), a highly aggressive subtype of metastatic androgen deprivation-resistant prostate cancer (ARPC) with limited treatment options and poor survival rates. Patients with metastases in the liver have a poor prognosis relative to those with bone metastases alone. The mechanisms that underlie the different behavior of ARPC in bone vs. liver may involve factors intrinsic to the tumor cell, tumor microenvironment, and/or systemic factors, and identifying these factors is critical to improved diagnosis and treatment of SCNC. Metabolic reprogramming is a fundamental strategy of tumor cells to colonize and proliferate in microenvironments distinct from the primary site. Understanding the metabolic plasticity of cancer cells may reveal novel approaches to imaging and treating metastases more effectively. Methods: Using magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and spectroscopy, we interrogated the physiological and metabolic characteristics of SCNC patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) propagated in the bone and liver, and used correlative biochemical, immunohistochemical, and transcriptomic measures to understand the biological underpinnings of the observed imaging metrics. Results: We found that the influence of the microenvironment on physiologic measures using MRI was variable among PDXs. However, the MR measure of glycolytic capacity in the liver using hyperpolarized 13C pyruvic acid recapitulated the enzyme activity (lactate dehydrogenase), cofactor (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide), and stable isotope measures of fractional enrichment of lactate. While in the bone, the congruence of the glycolytic components was lost and potentially weighted by the interaction of cancer cells with osteoclasts/osteoblasts. Conclusion: While there was little impact of microenvironmental factors on metabolism, the physiological measures (cellularity and perfusion) are highly variable and necessitate the use of combined hyperpolarized 13C MRI and multiparametric (anatomic, diffusion-, and perfusion- weighted) 1H MRI to better characterize pre-treatment tumor characteristics, which will be crucial to evaluate treatment response. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Magnetic Resonance in Cancer Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 941 KiB  
Article
Transperineal Free-Hand Prostate Fusion Biopsy with AI-Driven Auto-Contouring: First Results of a Prospective Study
by Marco Oderda, Giorgio Calleris, Alessandro Dematteis, Alessandro Greco, Alessandro Marquis, Giancarlo Marra, Umberto Merani, Alberto Sasia, Alessio Venturi, Andrea Zitella and Paolo Gontero
Cancers 2025, 17(14), 2381; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17142381 - 18 Jul 2025
Viewed by 228
Abstract
Background: prostate fusion biopsies are key in the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa); however, the fusion imaging system is not always user-friendly or reliable. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility, accuracy, and effectiveness of transperineal fusion biopsies performed [...] Read more.
Background: prostate fusion biopsies are key in the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa); however, the fusion imaging system is not always user-friendly or reliable. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility, accuracy, and effectiveness of transperineal fusion biopsies performed with a novel fusion imaging device equipped with AI-driven auto-contouring. Methods: data from 148 patients who underwent MRI-targeted and systematic prostate fusion biopsy with UroFusion (Esaote) were prospectively collected. All biopsies were performed in-office, under local anaesthesia. Results: cancer detection rate was 64% overall and 56% for clinically significant PCa (csPCa, ISUP ≥ 2). PCa was detected in 35%, 65% and 84% of lesions scored as PI-RADS 3, 4 and 5, respectively. Outfield positive systematic cores were found in the contralateral lobe in one third of cases. Median device-time to obtain fusion imaging was 5 min and median biopsy duration was 15 min. Median difference in volume estimation between ultrasound and MRI auto-contouring was only 1 cc. Detection rate did not differ between experienced and novice, supervised users. Conclusions: in this initial prospective experience, fusion biopsies performed with UroFusion AI-driven auto-contouring system appeared time-efficient, accurate, well tolerated, and user-friendly, with comparable outcomes between experienced and novice users. Systematic biopsies remain highly recommended given the non-negligible rates of positive outfield cores. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Oncological Imaging (2nd Edition))
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 1484 KiB  
Article
In-Bore MRI-Guided Ureteral Stent Placement During Prostate Cancer Cryoablation—A Case Series
by Sydney Whalen, David Woodrum, Scott Thompson, Dan Adamo, Derek Lomas and Lance Mynderse
Diagnostics 2025, 15(14), 1781; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15141781 - 15 Jul 2025
Viewed by 285
Abstract
Introduction: Ureteral stents are widely used in the specialty of urology to preserve renal function and provide ureteral patency in cases of urolithiasis, strictures, malignancy, and trauma. This paper presents a novel application of prophylactic ureteral stents deployed under MRI-guidance for ureteral [...] Read more.
Introduction: Ureteral stents are widely used in the specialty of urology to preserve renal function and provide ureteral patency in cases of urolithiasis, strictures, malignancy, and trauma. This paper presents a novel application of prophylactic ureteral stents deployed under MRI-guidance for ureteral protection in the setting of in-bore salvage cryoablation therapy for recurrent and metastatic prostate cancer. This is the first known case series of ureteral stent placement using near real-time MRI. Materials and Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed for all patients who underwent MRI-guided ureteral stent placement prior to in-bore cryoablation therapy from 2021 to 2022. Each case was managed by an interdisciplinary team of urologists and interventional radiologists. Preoperative and postoperative data were collected for descriptive analysis. Physics safety testing was conducted on the cystoscope and viewing apparatus prior to its implementation for stent deployment. Results: A total of seven males, mean age 73.4 years (range 65–81), underwent successful prophylactic, cystoscopic MRI-guided ureteral stent placement prior to cryoablation therapy of their prostate cancer. No intraoperative complications occurred. A Grade 2 postoperative complication of pyelonephritis and gross hematuria following stent removal occurred in one case. The majority of patients were discharged the same day as their procedure. Conclusions: This case series demonstrates the feasibility of in-bore cystoscopic aided MRI guidance for ureteral stent placement. Ureteral stents can be used to increase the safety margin of complex cryoablation treatments close to the ureter. Furthermore, by following the meticulous MRI safety protocols established by MRI facility safety design guidelines, MRI conditional tools can aid therapy in the burgeoning interventional MRI space. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Challenges in Urology: From the Diagnosis to the Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1242 KiB  
Review
Micro-Ultrasound in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Comprehensive Review and Comparison with Multiparametric MRI
by Julien DuBois, Shayan Smani, Aleksandra Golos, Carlos Rivera Lopez and Soum D. Lokeshwar
Tomography 2025, 11(7), 80; https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography11070080 - 8 Jul 2025
Viewed by 453
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) is widely established as the standard imaging modality for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), yet it can be limited by cost, accessibility, and the need for specialized radiologist interpretation. Micro-ultrasound (micro-US) has recently emerged as a more accessible [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) is widely established as the standard imaging modality for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), yet it can be limited by cost, accessibility, and the need for specialized radiologist interpretation. Micro-ultrasound (micro-US) has recently emerged as a more accessible alternative imaging modality. This review evaluates whether the evidence base for micro-US meets thresholds comparable to those that led to MRI’s guideline adoption, synthesizes diagnostic performance data compared to mpMRI, and outlines future research priorities to define its clinical role. Methods: A targeted literature review of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was conducted for studies published between 2014 and May 2025 evaluating micro-US in csPCa detection. Search terms included “micro-ultrasound,” “ExactVu,” “PRI-MUS,” and related terminology. Study relevance was assessed independently by the authors. Extracted data included csPCa detection rates, modality concordance, and diagnostic accuracy, and were synthesized and, rarely, restructured to facilitate study comparisons. Results: Micro-US consistently demonstrated non-inferiority to mpMRI for csPCa detection across retrospective studies, prospective cohorts, and meta-analyses. Several studies reported discordant csPCa lesions detected by only one modality, highlighting potential complementarity. The recently published OPTIMUM randomized controlled trial offers the strongest individual-trial evidence to date in support of micro-US non-inferiority. Conclusions: Micro-US shows potential as an alternative or adjunct to mpMRI for csPCa detection. However, additional robust multicenter studies are needed to achieve the evidentiary strength that led mpMRI to distinguish itself in clinical guidelines. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Trends in Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 401 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Integrating Machine Learning with Medical Imaging for Human Disease Diagnosis: A Survey
by Anass Roman, Chaymae Taib, Ilham Dhaiouir and Haimoudi El Khatir
Comput. Sci. Math. Forum 2025, 10(1), 12; https://doi.org/10.3390/cmsf2025010012 - 7 Jul 2025
Viewed by 258
Abstract
Machine learning is revolutionizing healthcare by enhancing diagnosis and treatment personalization. This study explores ML applications in medical imaging, analyzing data from X-rays, CT, MRI, and ultrasound for early disease detection. It reviews key ML models, including SVM, ANN, RF, CNN, and other [...] Read more.
Machine learning is revolutionizing healthcare by enhancing diagnosis and treatment personalization. This study explores ML applications in medical imaging, analyzing data from X-rays, CT, MRI, and ultrasound for early disease detection. It reviews key ML models, including SVM, ANN, RF, CNN, and other methods, demonstrating their effectiveness in detecting cancers such as lung and prostate cancer and other diseases. Despite their accuracy, these methods face challenges such as a reliance on large datasets and significant computational requirements. This study highlights the need for further research to integrate ML into clinical practice, addressing its limitations and unlocking new opportunities for improved patient care. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1445 KiB  
Article
A Deep Learning Model Integrating Clinical and MRI Features Improves Risk Stratification and Reduces Unnecessary Biopsies in Men with Suspected Prostate Cancer
by Emiliano Bacchetti, Axel De Nardin, Gianluca Giannarini, Lorenzo Cereser, Chiara Zuiani, Alessandro Crestani, Rossano Girometti and Gian Luca Foresti
Cancers 2025, 17(13), 2257; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17132257 - 7 Jul 2025
Viewed by 415
Abstract
Background: Accurate upfront risk stratification in suspected clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) may reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies. Integrating clinical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) variables using deep learning could improve prediction. Methods: We retrospectively analysed 538 men who underwent MRI and biopsy between [...] Read more.
Background: Accurate upfront risk stratification in suspected clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) may reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies. Integrating clinical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) variables using deep learning could improve prediction. Methods: We retrospectively analysed 538 men who underwent MRI and biopsy between April 2019-September 2024. A fully connected neural network was trained using 5-fold cross-validation. Model 1 included clinical features (age, prostate-specific antigen [PSA], PSA density, digital rectal examination, family history, prior negative biopsy, and ongoing therapy). Model 2 used MRI-derived Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) categories. Model 3 used all previous variables as well as lesion size, location, and prostate volume as determined on MRI. Results: Model 3 achieved the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC = 0.822), followed by Model 2 (AUC = 0.778) and Model 1 (AUC = 0.716). Sensitivities for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) were 87.4%, 91.6%, and 86.8% for Models 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Although Model 3 had slightly lower sensitivity than Model 2, it showed higher specificity, reducing false positives and avoiding 43.4% and 21.2% more biopsies compared to Models 1 and 2. Decision curve analysis showed M2 had the highest net benefit at risk thresholds ≤ 20%, while M3 was superior above 20%. Conclusions: Model 3 improved csPCa risk stratification, particularly in biopsy-averse settings, while Model 2 was more effective in cancer-averse scenarios. These models support personalized, context-sensitive biopsy decisions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Radiomics in Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1047 KiB  
Article
Patients with a Short Distance Between the Prostate and the Rectum Are Appropriate Candidates for Hydrogel Spacer Placement to Prevent Short-Term Rectal Hemorrhage After External-Beam Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer
by Shunsuke Owa, Takeshi Sasaki, Akito Taniguchi, Kazuki Omori, Taketomo Nishikawa, Momoko Kato, Shinichiro Higashi, Yusuke Sugino, Yutaka Toyomasu, Akinori Takada, Kouhei Nishikawa, Yoshihito Nomoto and Takahiro Inoue
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(7), 385; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32070385 - 3 Jul 2025
Viewed by 336
Abstract
Radiation therapy, including external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy, is curative for localized prostate cancer. Hydrogel spacer (HS) placement between the rectum and prostate is popular for reducing radiation-related complications. Criteria to identify patients who benefit from HS placement would be clinically valuable. [...] Read more.
Radiation therapy, including external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy, is curative for localized prostate cancer. Hydrogel spacer (HS) placement between the rectum and prostate is popular for reducing radiation-related complications. Criteria to identify patients who benefit from HS placement would be clinically valuable. In a retrospective analysis of 430 patients with localized prostate cancer treated between November 2010 and March 2023 with ≥2 years of follow-up, we evaluated the incidence of rectal hemorrhage and its association with the median distance at the midpoint between the prostate and the rectum (mDPR) on pretreatment MRI. Rectal hemorrhage occurred in 6% of HS cases and 18% of non-HS cases (p < 0.001). Among 268 patients who received EBRT (±brachytherapy), the incidence was 9% with HS and 30% without HS (p < 0.001). In non-HS cases, the rate in patients with mDPR ≤ 1.62 mm was higher than in those with mDPR > 1.62 mm (24% vs. 12%, respectively; p = 0.04). In patients with EBRT and mDPR ≤ 1.62 mm, HS significantly reduced hemorrhage (9% vs. 39%, respectively; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified mDPR and HS as independent predictors of rectal hemorrhage (both p = 0.02). Thus, HS placement may be safely omitted in non-EBRT cases with mDPR ≥ 1.62 mm. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Genitourinary Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

30 pages, 4082 KiB  
Systematic Review
Prostate MRI Using Deep Learning Reconstruction in Response to Cancer Screening Demands—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Stephan Ursprung, Georgios Agrotis, Petra J. van Houdt, Leon C. ter Beek, Thierry N. Boellaard, Regina G. H. Beets-Tan, Derya Yakar, Anwar R. Padhani and Ivo G. Schoots
J. Pers. Med. 2025, 15(7), 284; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15070284 - 2 Jul 2025
Viewed by 367
Abstract
Background/Objectives: There is a growing need for efficient prostate MRI protocols due to their increasing use in managing prostate cancer (PCa) and potential inclusion in screening. Deep learning reconstruction (DLR) may enhance MR acquisitions and improve image quality compared to conventional acceleration [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: There is a growing need for efficient prostate MRI protocols due to their increasing use in managing prostate cancer (PCa) and potential inclusion in screening. Deep learning reconstruction (DLR) may enhance MR acquisitions and improve image quality compared to conventional acceleration techniques. This systematic review examines DLR approaches to prostate MRI. Methods: A search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar identified eligible studies comparing DLR to conventional reconstruction for prostate imaging. A narrative synthesis was performed to summarize the impact of DLR on acquisition time, image quality, and diagnostic performance. Results: Thirty-three studies showed that DLR can reduce acquisition times for T2w and DWI imaging while maintaining or improving image quality. It did not significantly affect clinical tasks, such as biopsy decisions, and performed comparably to human readers in PI-RADS scoring and the detection of extraprostatic extension. However, AI models trained on conventional data might be less accurate with DLR images. The heterogeneity in image quality metrics among the studies prevented quantitative synthesis. Discussion: DLR has the potential to achieve substantial time savings in prostate MRI while maintaining image quality, which is especially relevant because of increased MRI demands. Future research should address the effect of DLR on clinically relevant downstream tasks, including AI algorithms’ performances and biopsy decisions, and explore task-specific accelerated protocols for screening, image-guided biopsy, and treatment. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 418 KiB  
Article
Comparing Multigene Molecular Testing Results of MRI-Target Versus Systematic Prostate Needle Biopsies of Candidates for and Under Active Surveillance
by Nicholas J. Lanzotti, Chris Du, Julia Hall, Joseph Saba, Maria M. Picken and Gopal N. Gupta
J. Pers. Med. 2025, 15(7), 279; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15070279 - 1 Jul 2025
Viewed by 316
Abstract
Introduction: The multigene molecular testing of prostate cancer tissue after biopsy provides individualized information to guide further management. The utility of selective genetic testing for MRI-visible target versus systematic cancer in patients as well as during different time points of active surveillance (AS) [...] Read more.
Introduction: The multigene molecular testing of prostate cancer tissue after biopsy provides individualized information to guide further management. The utility of selective genetic testing for MRI-visible target versus systematic cancer in patients as well as during different time points of active surveillance (AS) is unknown. The objective of this study was to compare ProlarisTM results of MRI-target cancers versus systematic cancers on prostate needle biopsy as well as both during consideration for initial AS candidacy and candidacy for remaining on AS. Methods: Our prospectively maintained institutional multiparametric (mp) MRI prostate cancer active surveillance database (2013–2024) was queried for patients that underwent ProlarisTM genetic testing of positive biopsy cores. Baseline information for PSA, PSA density, and ProlarisTM calculated data were collected. Information on the timing of the Prolaris testing, defined as during the initial cancer diagnostic biopsy or on a subsequent confirmatory biopsy was collected. SPSS v29.0 was used to compare the selective ProlarisTM results of MRI-target cancers versus systematic cancers during different points of AS. Results: 264 patients with a ProlarisTM test were identified, 86 with MRI-target and 178 on systematic cancers. 182 ProlarisTM tests were sent on a diagnostic biopsy and 81 on a subsequent biopsy. Overall, MRI-target cancers had similar risk scores (3.23 vs. 3.14, p = 0.18). ProlarisTM scores were higher for GG2 systematic than GG1 target cancers (3.40 vs. 3.18, p = 0.023). The GG2 systematic lesion cohort also had higher predicted the 10-year disease-specific mortality (DSM) (3.40% vs. 2.30%, p < 0.01) and 10-year metastasis risk (1.90% vs. 1.20%, p = 0.013), and more aggressive recommended treatment. Analyses of the ProlarisTM results sent during a diagnostic biopsy yielded similar results. Finally, on an analysis of the ProlarisTM results sent during subsequent biopsy, a systematic GG2 biopsy was noted to have a higher 10-year DSM and metastasis rate, but similar risk scores and treatment recommendations. Conclusions: ProlarisTM tests can be sent at multiple time points of AS, and selectively for MRI-visible versus higher grade cancers. There is no consistent association between MRI-visible cancer and Prolaris risk profile. When utilizing multigene molecular testing in prostate cancer, each individual patient must be evaluated to decide the appropriate level of care. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urological Cancer: Clinical Advances in Personalized Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 4423 KiB  
Article
Multivariate Framework of Metabolism in Advanced Prostate Cancer Using Whole Abdominal and Pelvic Hyperpolarized 13C MRI—A Correlative Study with Clinical Outcomes
by Hsin-Yu Chen, Ivan de Kouchkovsky, Robert A. Bok, Michael A. Ohliger, Zhen J. Wang, Daniel Gebrezgiabhier, Tanner Nickles, Lucas Carvajal, Jeremy W. Gordon, Peder E. Z. Larson, John Kurhanewicz, Rahul Aggarwal and Daniel B. Vigneron
Cancers 2025, 17(13), 2211; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17132211 - 1 Jul 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 487 | Correction
Abstract
Background: Most of the existing hyperpolarized (HP) 13C MRI analyses use univariate rate maps of pyruvate-to-lactate conversion (kPL), and radiomic-style multiparametric models extracting complex, higher-order features remain unexplored. Purpose: To establish a multivariate framework based on whole abdomen/pelvis HP 13 [...] Read more.
Background: Most of the existing hyperpolarized (HP) 13C MRI analyses use univariate rate maps of pyruvate-to-lactate conversion (kPL), and radiomic-style multiparametric models extracting complex, higher-order features remain unexplored. Purpose: To establish a multivariate framework based on whole abdomen/pelvis HP 13C-pyruvate MRI and evaluate the association between multiparametric features of metabolism (MFM) and clinical outcome measures in advanced and metastatic prostate cancer. Methods: Retrospective statistical analysis was performed on 16 participants with metastatic or local-regionally advanced prostate cancer prospectively enrolled in a tertiary center who underwent HP-pyruvate MRI of abdomen or pelvis between November 2020 and May 2023. Five patients were hormone-sensitive and eleven were castration-resistant. GMP-grade [1-13C]pyruvate was polarized using a 5T clinical-research DNP polarizer, and HP MRI used a set of flexible vest-transmit, array-receive coils, and echo-planar imaging sequences. Three basic metabolic maps (kPL, pyruvate summed-over-time, and mean pyruvate time) were created by semi-automatic segmentation, from which 316 MFMs were extracted using an open-source, radiomic-compliant software package. Univariate risk classifier was constructed using a biologically meaningful feature (kPL,median), and the multivariate classifier used a two-step feature selection process (ranking and clustering). Both were correlated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) (median follow-up = 22.0 months) using Cox proportional hazards model. Results: In the univariate analysis, patients harboring tumors with lower-kPL,median had longer PFS (11.2 vs. 0.5 months, p < 0.01) and OS (NR vs. 18.4 months, p < 0.05) than their higher-kPL,median counterparts. Using a hypothesis-generating, age-adjusted multivariate risk classifier, the lower-risk subgroup also had longer PFS (NR vs. 2.4 months, p < 0.002) and OS (NR vs. 18.4 months, p < 0.05). By contrast, established laboratory markers, including PSA, lactate dehydrogenase, and alkaline phosphatase, were not significantly associated with PFS or OS (p > 0.05). Key limitations of this study include small sample size, retrospective study design, and referral bias. Conclusions: Risk classifiers derived from select multiparametric HP features were significantly associated with clinically meaningful outcome measures in this small, heterogeneous patient cohort, strongly supporting further investigation into their prognostic values. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1312 KiB  
Article
Detection Rates of Prostate Cancer Across Prostatic Zones Using Freehand Single-Access Transperineal Fusion Biopsies
by Filippo Carletti, Giuseppe Reitano, Eleonora Martina Toffoletto, Arianna Tumminello, Elisa Tonet, Giovanni Basso, Martina Bruniera, Anna Cacco, Elena Rebaudengo, Giorgio Saggionetto, Giovanni Betto, Giacomo Novara, Fabrizio Dal Moro and Fabio Zattoni
Cancers 2025, 17(13), 2206; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17132206 - 30 Jun 2025
Viewed by 349
Abstract
Background/Objectives: It remains unclear whether certain areas of the prostate are more difficult to accurately sample using MRI/US-fusion-guided freehand single-access transperineal prostate biopsy (FSA-TP). The aim of this study was to evaluate the detection rates of clinically significant (cs) and clinically insignificant [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: It remains unclear whether certain areas of the prostate are more difficult to accurately sample using MRI/US-fusion-guided freehand single-access transperineal prostate biopsy (FSA-TP). The aim of this study was to evaluate the detection rates of clinically significant (cs) and clinically insignificant (ci) prostate cancer (PCa) in each prostate zone during FSA-TP MRI-target biopsies (MRI-TBs) and systematic biopsies (SB). Methods: This monocentric observational study included a cohort of 277 patients with no prior history of PCa who underwent 3 MRI-TB cores and 14 SB cores with an FSA-TP from January to December 2023. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was assessed to evaluate the correlation between the Prostate Imaging–Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) of the index lesion and the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade stratified according to prostate zone and region of index lesion at MRI. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with PCa and csPCa in patients with discordant results between MRI-TB and SB. Results: FSA-TP-MRI-TB demonstrated higher detection rates of both ciPCa and csPCa in the anterior, apical, and intermediate zones when each of the three MRI-TB cores was analysed separately (p < 0.01). However, when all MRI-TB cores were combined, no significant differences were observed in detection rates across prostate zones (apex, mid, base; p = 0.57) or regions (anterior vs. posterior; p = 0.34). Concordance between radiologic and histopathologic findings, as measured by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), was similar across all zones (apex ICC: 0.33; mid ICC: 0.34; base ICC: 0.38) and regions (anterior ICC: 0.42; posterior ICC: 0.26). Univariate analysis showed that in patients with PCa detected on SB but with negative MRI-TB, older age was the only significant predictor (p = 0.04). Multivariate analysis revealed that patients with PCa detected on MRI-TB but with negative SB, only PSA remained a significant predictor (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1–1.4; p = 0.01). In cases with csPCa detected on MRI-TB but with negative SB, age (OR: 1.0, 95% CI 1.0–1.1; p = 0.02), positive digital rectal examination (OR: 2.0, 95% CI 1.1–3.8; p = 0.03), PI-RADS score >3 (OR: 4.5, 95% CI 1.7–12.1; p < 0.01), and larger lesion size (OR: 1.1, 95% CI 1.1–1.2; p < 0.01) were significant predictors. Conclusions: FSA-TP using 14 SB cores and 3 MRI-TB cores ensures comprehensive sampling of all prostate regions, including anterior and apical zones, without significant differences in detection rates between nodules across different zones. Only in a small percentage of patients was csPCa detected exclusively by SB, highlighting the small but important complementary value of combining SB and MRI-TB. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop