Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (77)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = KRAS G12C inhibitors

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
20 pages, 4049 KiB  
Article
ADMET-Guided Docking and GROMACS Molecular Dynamics of Ziziphus lotus Phytochemicals Uncover Mutation-Agnostic Allosteric Stabilisers of the KRAS Switch-I/II Groove
by Abdessadek Rahimi, Oussama Khibech, Abdessamad Benabbou, Mohammed Merzouki, Mohamed Bouhrim, Mohammed Al-Zharani, Fahd A. Nasr, Ashraf Ahmed Qurtam, Said Abadi, Allal Challioui, Mostafa Mimouni and Maarouf Elbekay
Pharmaceuticals 2025, 18(8), 1110; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18081110 - 25 Jul 2025
Viewed by 451
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Oncogenic KRAS drives ~30% of solid tumours, yet the only approved G12C-specific drugs benefit ≈ 13% of KRAS-mutant patients, leaving a major clinical gap. We sought mutation-agnostic natural ligands from Ziziphus lotus, whose stereochemically rich phenolics may overcome this limitation by occupying [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Oncogenic KRAS drives ~30% of solid tumours, yet the only approved G12C-specific drugs benefit ≈ 13% of KRAS-mutant patients, leaving a major clinical gap. We sought mutation-agnostic natural ligands from Ziziphus lotus, whose stereochemically rich phenolics may overcome this limitation by occupying the SI/II (Switch I/Switch II) groove and locking KRAS in its inactive state. Methods: Phytochemical mining yielded five recurrent phenolics, such as (+)-catechin, hyperin, astragalin, eriodictyol, and the prenylated benzoate amorfrutin A, benchmarked against the covalent inhibitor sotorasib. An in silico cascade combined SI/II docking, multi-parameter ADME/T (Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion, and Toxicity) filtering, and 100 ns explicit solvent molecular dynamics simulations. Pharmacokinetic modelling predicted oral absorption, Lipinski compliance, mutagenicity, and acute-toxicity class. Results: Hyperin and astragalin showed the strongest non-covalent affinities (−8.6 kcal mol−1) by forging quadridentate hydrogen-bond networks that bridge the P-loop (Asp30/Glu31) to the α3-loop cleft (Asp119/Ala146). Catechin (−8.5 kcal mol−1) balanced polar anchoring with entropic economy. ADME ranked amorfrutin A the highest for predicted oral absorption (93%) but highlighted lipophilic solubility limits; glycosylated flavonols breached Lipinski rules yet remained non-mutagenic with class-5 acute-toxicity liability. Molecular dynamics trajectories confirmed that hyperin clamps the SI/II groove, suppressing loop RMSF below 0.20 nm and maintaining backbone RMSD stability, whereas astragalin retains pocket residence with transient re-orientation. Conclusions: Hyperin emerges as a low-toxicity, mutation-agnostic scaffold that rigidifies inactive KRAS. Deglycosylation, nano-encapsulation, or soft fluorination could reconcile permeability with durable target engagement, advancing Z. lotus phenolics toward broad-spectrum KRAS therapeutics. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Natural Products)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

10 pages, 738 KiB  
Article
In Vitro Evaluation of Electrochemotherapy Combined with Sotorasib in Pancreatic Carcinoma Cell Lines Harboring Distinct KRAS Mutations
by Tanja Jesenko, Masa Omerzel, Tina Zivic, Gregor Sersa and Maja Cemazar
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(15), 7165; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26157165 - 24 Jul 2025
Viewed by 306
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is among the deadliest malignancies, with limited treatment options and poor prognosis. Novel strategies are therefore urgently needed. Sotorasib, a KRAS G12C-specific inhibitor, offers targeted treatment for a small subset of patients with this mutation. Electrochemotherapy (ECT), which enhances the cytotoxicity [...] Read more.
Pancreatic cancer is among the deadliest malignancies, with limited treatment options and poor prognosis. Novel strategies are therefore urgently needed. Sotorasib, a KRAS G12C-specific inhibitor, offers targeted treatment for a small subset of patients with this mutation. Electrochemotherapy (ECT), which enhances the cytotoxicity of chemotherapeutic agents through electroporation-induced membrane permeabilization, has shown promise in various tumor types, including deep-seated malignancies such as pancreatic cancer. Combining ECT with sotorasib may potentiate antitumor effects in KRAS G12C-mutated pancreatic cancer; however, preclinical data on such combinations are lacking. This proof-of-concept study evaluated the cytotoxic effects of ECT using bleomycin (BLM) or cisplatin (CDDP) in combination with sotorasib in KRAS G12C-mutated MIA PaCa-2 and KRAS G12D-mutated PANC-1 pancreatic cancer cell lines. ECT alone significantly reduced cell viability, particularly in MIA PaCa-2 cells, where electric pulses induced approximately 75% cell death. Combining ECT with sotorasib resulted in an additive effect on KRAS G12C-mutated MIA PaCa-2 cells, though no synergy was observed, likely due to the high intrinsic sensitivity to electric pulses. These results support the potential of combining physical and molecular therapies in a subset of pancreatic cancer patients and lay the groundwork for further in vivo studies to optimize treatment parameters and explore clinical translatability. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Pathology, Diagnostics, and Therapeutics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

34 pages, 2332 KiB  
Review
Treatment of KRAS-Mutated Pancreatic Cancer: New Hope for the Patients?
by Kamila Krupa, Marta Fudalej, Emilia Włoszek, Hanna Miski, Anna M. Badowska-Kozakiewicz, Dominika Mękal, Michał P. Budzik, Aleksandra Czerw and Andrzej Deptała
Cancers 2025, 17(15), 2453; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17152453 - 24 Jul 2025
Viewed by 877
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer, specifically pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), ranks among the most lethal malignancies, with a 5-year survival rate of under 10%. The most prevalent KRAS mutations occur in three hotspot residues: glycine-12 (G12), glycine-13 (G13), and glutamine-61 (Q61), leading to the constant activation [...] Read more.
Pancreatic cancer, specifically pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), ranks among the most lethal malignancies, with a 5-year survival rate of under 10%. The most prevalent KRAS mutations occur in three hotspot residues: glycine-12 (G12), glycine-13 (G13), and glutamine-61 (Q61), leading to the constant activation of the Ras pathway, making them the primary focus in oncologic drug development. Selective KRAS G12C inhibitors (e.g., sotorasib, adagrasib) have demonstrated moderate efficacy in clinical trials; however, this mutation is infrequent in PDAC. Emerging therapies targeting KRAS G12D and G12V mutations, such as MRTX1133, PROTACs, and active-state inhibitors, show promise in preclinical studies. Pan-RAS inhibitors like ADT-007, RMC-9805, and RMC-6236 compounds provide broader coverage of mutations. Their efficacy and safety are currently being investigated in several clinical trials. A major challenge is the development of resistance mechanisms, including secondary mutations and pathway reactivation. Combination therapies targeting the RAS/MAPK axis, SHP2, mTOR, or SOS1 are under clinical investigation. Immunotherapy alone has demonstrated limited effectiveness, attributed to an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, although synergistic effects are noted when paired with KRAS-targeted agents. Furthermore, KRAS mutations reprogram cancer metabolism, enhancing glycolysis, macropinocytosis, and autophagy, which are being explored therapeutically. RNA interference technologies have also shown potential in silencing mutant KRAS and reducing tumorigenicity. Future strategies should emphasize the combination of targeted therapies with metabolic or immunomodulatory agents to overcome resistance and enhance survival in KRAS-mutated PDAC. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 4034 KiB  
Article
Establishment of Human Lung Cancer Organoids Using Small Biopsy and Surgical Tissues
by Mina Hwang, Junsu Choe, Yong Jae Shin, Bo-Gyeong Seo, Kyung-Mi Park, Sun Hye Shin, Byung Woo Jhun, Hongseok Yoo, Byeong-Ho Jeong, Kyeongman Jeon, Kyungjong Lee, Junghee Lee, Yeong Jeong Jeon, Jong Ho Cho, Seong Yong Park, Hong Kwan Kim and Sang-Won Um
Cancers 2025, 17(14), 2291; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17142291 - 10 Jul 2025
Viewed by 632
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Lung cancer is a highly diverse disease, and reliable preclinical models that accurately reflect tumor characteristics are essential for studying lung cancer biology and testing new therapies. This study aimed to establish patient-derived tumor organoids (PDTOs) using small biopsy samples and surgical [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Lung cancer is a highly diverse disease, and reliable preclinical models that accurately reflect tumor characteristics are essential for studying lung cancer biology and testing new therapies. This study aimed to establish patient-derived tumor organoids (PDTOs) using small biopsy samples and surgical specimens to create a model system that preserves the genetic and histological features of the original tumors. Methods: PDTOs were generated from 163 lung cancer specimens, including 109 samples obtained using endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) or bronchoscopy, 52 surgical specimens, and 2 pleural fluid samples. The organoid establishment rate beyond passage three was assessed, and histological subtypes and genetic profiles were analyzed using immunohistochemical staining and targeted exome sequencing. Results: The overall PDTO establishment rate was 34.4% (56/163), and 44.6% (25/56) of these organoids retained the histological and genetic features of the parental tumors. Genetic analysis identified key mutations, including KRAS G12C, EGFR L858R, MET exon 14 skipping mutation, and ROS1 fusion. PDTOs successfully formed tumors in mice while maintaining the genetic characteristics of the original tumors. Co-culture of PDTOs with cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) resulted in increased resistance to paclitaxel. In the co-culture model of PDTOs with immune cells, dose-dependent growth inhibition of PDTOs was observed in response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Conclusions: PDTOs established from small biopsy and surgical specimens serve as a valuable model for studying lung cancer biology, tumor microenvironment interactions, and drug response. This model has the potential to improve personalized treatment strategies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Perspectives in the Treatment of Thoracic Cancers)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 547 KiB  
Review
RAS Mutations in Advanced Colorectal Cancer: Mechanisms, Clinical Implications, and Novel Therapeutic Approaches
by Osman Sütcüoğlu, Hasan Çağrı Yıldırım, Elvina Almuradova, Damla Günenç and Şuayib Yalçın
Medicina 2025, 61(7), 1202; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61071202 - 30 Jun 2025
Viewed by 547
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality globally, posing significant treatment challenges, particularly in its metastatic form (mCRC). This review comprehensively examines the pivotal role of RAS mutations, specifically KRAS and NRAS, which are detected in approximately 40–45% of mCRC [...] Read more.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality globally, posing significant treatment challenges, particularly in its metastatic form (mCRC). This review comprehensively examines the pivotal role of RAS mutations, specifically KRAS and NRAS, which are detected in approximately 40–45% of mCRC cases, and their impact on treatment decisions and patient outcomes. We assess the effectiveness of standard treatments within the RAS mutant population, highlighting the challenges and limitations these therapies face. Recent advancements in targeted therapies, particularly the focus on novel agents such as KRAS G12C inhibitors, including sotorasib and adagrasib, have shown promising efficacy in overcoming resistance to conventional treatments. Furthermore, this review discusses future directions, emphasizing the need for research into non-RAS targets to address the complexities of resistance mechanisms and improve therapeutic outcomes. This review aims to provide a detailed overview of the current treatments and innovative approaches, supporting the development of personalized management strategies for patients with mCRC. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Oncology)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

24 pages, 5400 KiB  
Article
Design, Synthesis, Anticancer Evaluation and Molecular Docking of Pyrimidine, Pyrido[4,3-d]pyrimidine and 5,6,7,8-Tetrahydropyrido[3,4-d]pyrimidine Derivatives as Novel KRAS-G12D Inhibitors and PROTACs
by Hailong Yang, Lu Gan and Huabei Zhang
Pharmaceuticals 2025, 18(5), 696; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18050696 - 8 May 2025
Viewed by 1654
Abstract
Background: KRAS-G12D mutations drive 20–50% of pancreatic/biliary cancers yet remain challenging to target due to GTP-pocket conservation and high cellular GTP levels. While allosteric inhibitors targeting the SWII pocket (e.g., MRTX1133) show promise, limited chemical diversity and paradoxical cellular/enzymatic activity relationships necessitate [...] Read more.
Background: KRAS-G12D mutations drive 20–50% of pancreatic/biliary cancers yet remain challenging to target due to GTP-pocket conservation and high cellular GTP levels. While allosteric inhibitors targeting the SWII pocket (e.g., MRTX1133) show promise, limited chemical diversity and paradoxical cellular/enzymatic activity relationships necessitate the exploration of novel scaffolds. This study aims to develop KRAS-G12D inhibitors and PROTACs to offer a selection of new chemical entities through systematic structure–activity optimization and evaluate their therapeutic potential through PROTAC derivatization. Methods: Eleven compounds featuring heterocyclic cores (pyrimidine/pyrido[4,3-d]pyrimidine/5,6,7,8-tetrahydroprodo[3,4-d]pyrimidine) were designed via structure-based drug design. Antiproliferative activity against KRAS-G12D (Panc1), KRAS-G13D (HCT116) and wild-type (A549) cells was assessed using the CCK-8 assay. KRAS-G12D enzymatic inhibition was measured using a GTPase activity assay. Molecular docking simulations (Sybyl 2.0; PDB:7RPZ) elucidated binding modes. Two PROTACs were synthesized from lead compounds by conjugating E3 ligase linkers. All the novel inhibitors and PROTACs were characterized by means of NMR or HRMS. Results: Compound 10c demonstrated selective anti-proliferation in Panc1 cells (IC50 = 1.40 μM) with 4.9-fold greater selectivity over wild-type cells, despite weak enzymatic inhibition (IC50 > 10 μM). Docking revealed critical hydrogen bonds between its protonated 3,8-diazabicyclo[3.2.1]octane moiety and Asp12/Gly60. The enzymatic inhibitor 10k showed potent KRAS-G12D inhibition (IC50 = 0.009 μM) through homopiperazine-mediated interactions with Glu92/His95. Derived PROTACs 26a/b exhibited reduced potency (IC50 = 3–5 μM vs. parental 10k: 2.22 μM), potentially due to impaired membrane permeability. Conclusions: Eleven novel KRAS-G12D inhibitors with a seven-membered ring pharmacophore were synthesized. Compound 10c showed strong anti-proliferative activity, while 10k exhibited potent enzymatic inhibition. Two PROTACs were designed but showed no clear advantage over 10k. This study provides valuable insights for KRAS-targeted drug development. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Medicinal Chemistry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 963 KiB  
Review
Targeting the KRAS Oncogene for Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
by Ruoyu Miao, James Yu and Richard D. Kim
Cancers 2025, 17(9), 1512; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17091512 - 30 Apr 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2231
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide, with KRAS mutations occurring in approximately 40% of cases. These mutations drive tumorigenesis through the constitutive activation of key signaling pathways, such as RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK (MAPK) and PI3K-AKT-mTOR, contributing to therapeutic resistance and [...] Read more.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide, with KRAS mutations occurring in approximately 40% of cases. These mutations drive tumorigenesis through the constitutive activation of key signaling pathways, such as RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK (MAPK) and PI3K-AKT-mTOR, contributing to therapeutic resistance and poor prognosis. Advances in molecular biology have led to significant breakthroughs, including the development of KRAS G12C inhibitors, such as sotorasib and adagrasib, which have shown promise in clinical trials. However, their efficacy is limited to a small subset of KRAS-mutant CRC, and resistance mechanisms often emerge through compensatory pathway activation. Combination strategies, including KRAS inhibitors with anti-EGFR agents, have been explored in trials like KRYSTAL-1 and CodeBreaK 300. Emerging research highlights the role of the tumor microenvironment in immune evasion and therapeutic resistance, offering opportunities for novel immunotherapy approaches, including KRAS neoantigen vaccines and adoptive T-cell therapy. Despite these advancements, challenges such as intratumoral heterogeneity, limited immune infiltration, and non-G12C KRAS mutations remain significant hurdles. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the molecular mechanisms, current advances and challenges, and future prospects in the management of KRAS-mutant CRC. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 5075 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of the Inhibitory Potential of Apigenin and Related Flavonoids on Various Proteins Associated with Human Diseases Using AutoDock
by Tanat Peanlikhit, Uma Aryal, James S. Welsh, Kenneth R. Shroyer and Kanokporn Noy Rithidech
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(6), 2548; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26062548 - 12 Mar 2025
Viewed by 1268
Abstract
We used molecular docking to determine the binding energy and interactions of apigenin and 16 related flavonoids, with 24 distinct proteins having diverse biological functions. We aimed to identify potential inhibitors of these proteins and understand the structural configurations of flavonoids impacting their [...] Read more.
We used molecular docking to determine the binding energy and interactions of apigenin and 16 related flavonoids, with 24 distinct proteins having diverse biological functions. We aimed to identify potential inhibitors of these proteins and understand the structural configurations of flavonoids impacting their binding energy. Our results demonstrate that apigenin exhibits high binding energies (a surrogate for binding affinity or inhibitory potential) to all tested proteins. The strongest binding energy was −8.21 kcal/mol for p38 mitogen-activated protein kinases, while the weakest was −5.34 kcal/mol for cyclin-dependent kinase 4. Apigenin and many other flavonoids showed high binding energies on xanthine oxidase (1.1–1.5 fold of febuxostat) and DNA methyltransferases (1.1–1.2 fold of azacytidine). We uncovered high binding energies of apigenin and certain flavonoids with mutated Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog at G12D (KRAS G12D), G12V, and G12C. Consequently, apigenin and certain flavonoids have the potential to effectively inhibit pan-KRAS oncogenic activity, not just on specific KRAS mutations. Apigenin and certain flavonoids also have high binding energies with aromatase (involved in estrogen production) and bacterial infections, i.e., DNA gyrase B and 3R-hydroxy acyl-ACP dehydratase (FABZ). Our findings are pivotal in identifying specific flavonoids that can effectively inhibit targeted proteins, paving the way for the development of innovative flavonoid-based drugs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Drug Discovery Based on Natural Products)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 853 KiB  
Review
What Is Next for Refractory Colorectal Cancer CRC? Looking Beyond SUNLIGHT, FRESCO2, RECURSE and CORRECT
by Sara Cherri, Michela Libertini, Silvia Noventa, Ester Oneda, Fausto Meriggi and Alberto Zaniboni
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(6), 2522; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26062522 - 11 Mar 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2065
Abstract
The treatment landscape of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has undergone significant evolution, with the introduction of targeted therapies and immunotherapy dramatically altering the management of microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumors. However, the majority of patients, particularly those with microsatellite-stable (MSS) disease, remain refractory to [...] Read more.
The treatment landscape of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has undergone significant evolution, with the introduction of targeted therapies and immunotherapy dramatically altering the management of microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumors. However, the majority of patients, particularly those with microsatellite-stable (MSS) disease, remain refractory to immunotherapy, necessitating the exploration of alternative therapeutic strategies. This review summarizes the current treatment options for heavily pretreated mCRC patients who are not eligible for targeted therapies or clinical trials. Approved therapies for refractory mCRC, including regorafenib, trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI), and fruquintinib, demonstrate modest survival benefits but are often associated with significant toxicities. Additionally, innovative approaches targeting specific mutations such as KRAS G12C, HER2 amplification, and BRAF V600E are discussed, highlighting emerging combination regimens with immune checkpoint inhibitors and other agents to overcome resistance mechanisms. The potential of rechallenge strategies using previously administered therapies, such as oxaliplatin and anti-EGFR agents, is examined, supported by retrospective and prospective studies. Furthermore, the role of older drugs like mitomycin C in combination with capecitabine is revisited, offering insights into their viability in advanced treatment settings. Ongoing clinical trials with novel agents and combinations are expected to provide further clarity on optimizing sequential treatment regimens and personalizing therapy for mCRC patients. This review emphasizes the need for comprehensive molecular profiling and shared decision-making to improve outcomes and quality of life in this challenging patient population. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Pathology, Diagnostics, and Therapeutics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 1260 KiB  
Review
The Role of KRAS Mutations in Colorectal Cancer: Biological Insights, Clinical Implications, and Future Therapeutic Perspectives
by Mitsunobu Takeda, Shoma Yoshida, Takuya Inoue, Yuki Sekido, Tsuyoshi Hata, Atsushi Hamabe, Takayuki Ogino, Norikatsu Miyoshi, Mamoru Uemura, Hirofumi Yamamoto, Yuichiro Doki and Hidetoshi Eguchi
Cancers 2025, 17(3), 428; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17030428 - 27 Jan 2025
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 7961
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a leading cause of cancer mortality globally, with KRAS mutations occurring in 30–40% of cases, contributing to poor prognosis and resistance to anti-EGFR therapy. This review explores the biological significance, clinical implications, and therapeutic targeting of KRAS [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a leading cause of cancer mortality globally, with KRAS mutations occurring in 30–40% of cases, contributing to poor prognosis and resistance to anti-EGFR therapy. This review explores the biological significance, clinical implications, and therapeutic targeting of KRAS mutations in CRC. Methods: A comprehensive analysis of the existing literature and clinical trials was performed, highlighting the role of KRAS mutations in CRC pathogenesis, their impact on prognosis, and recent advancements in targeted therapies. Specific attention was given to emerging therapeutic strategies and resistance mechanisms. Results: KRAS mutations drive tumor progression through persistent activation of MAPK/ERK and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways. These mutations influence the tumor microenvironment, cancer stem cell formation, macropinocytosis, and cell competition. KRAS-mutant CRC exhibits poor responsiveness to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies and demonstrates primary and acquired resistance to KRAS inhibitors. Recent breakthroughs include the development of KRAS G12C inhibitors (sotorasib and adagrasib) and promising agents targeting G12D mutations. However, response rates in CRC remain suboptimal compared to other cancers, necessitating combination therapies and novel approaches, such as vaccines, nucleic acid-based therapeutics, and macropinocytosis inhibitors. Conclusions: KRAS mutations are central to CRC pathogenesis and present a significant therapeutic challenge. Advances in KRAS-targeted therapies offer hope for improved outcomes, but resistance mechanisms and organ-specific differences limit efficacy. Continued efforts in personalized treatment strategies and translational research are critical for overcoming these challenges and improving patient survival. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Significance of KRAS Gene Mutations in Colorectal Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

31 pages, 1578 KiB  
Review
Emerging Targeted Therapies in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
by Syeda A. Mina, Mohamed Shanshal, Konstantinos Leventakos and Kaushal Parikh
Cancers 2025, 17(3), 353; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17030353 - 22 Jan 2025
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 5907
Abstract
Targeted therapies have changed the treatment landscape of non-small-cell lung cancer and led to improved patient survival across all stages of lung cancer. Newer advances in common and novel oncogenic drivers continue to occur at vigorous speed, making it challenging to stay up [...] Read more.
Targeted therapies have changed the treatment landscape of non-small-cell lung cancer and led to improved patient survival across all stages of lung cancer. Newer advances in common and novel oncogenic drivers continue to occur at vigorous speed, making it challenging to stay up to date with the rapidly evolving field. In this article, we review the emerging perspectives in the treatment of actionable targets in lung cancer. We focus on the development of newer KRAS-directed therapies, particularly on non-G12C mutations, pan-RAS inhibitors, and RAS-GTP inhibitors. We also describe the current standard of care for EGFR- and ALK-altered NSCLC and dive into the novel treatments expected to be in the clinic soon. A similar approach is taken toward MET, HER2, RET, ROS1, and FGFR alterations as emerging targets in non-small-cell lung cancer. Finally, we conclude this review with the current body of evidence for targeting TROP-2 as a novel target, potentially of importance in post-targeted therapy scenarios. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 663 KiB  
Review
Clinical Advances and Challenges in Targeting KRAS Mutations in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
by Simone E. Dekker and Lei Deng
Cancers 2024, 16(22), 3885; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16223885 - 20 Nov 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2578 | Correction
Abstract
KRAS mutation is one of the most common oncogenic drivers in non-small cell lung cancer. Since its discovery about four decades ago, drug development targeting KRAS has been met with countless failures. Recently, KRAS G12C, a subvariant of KRAS, became the first druggable [...] Read more.
KRAS mutation is one of the most common oncogenic drivers in non-small cell lung cancer. Since its discovery about four decades ago, drug development targeting KRAS has been met with countless failures. Recently, KRAS G12C, a subvariant of KRAS, became the first druggable KRAS mutation. The efficacy of the first-generation KRAS inhibitor is modest, but with scientific advancement, KRAS G12C inhibitors with higher potency are on the horizon. Additionally, novel therapeutic approaches targeting other KRAS subvariants are also being explored in clinical trials with encouraging early data. We will review the clinical advances and challenges for patients with KRAS-mutated non-small cell lung cancer, with a focus on small molecule inhibitors. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 1208 KiB  
Case Report
BRAF V600E-Mutant Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Case Series and Literature Review of a Rare Entity
by Giby V. George, Andrew G. Evans and Audrey N. Jajosky
Genes 2024, 15(11), 1383; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15111383 - 28 Oct 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2016
Abstract
Background: Although BRAF V600E mutations are common in solid tumors and select hematologic neoplasms, they are reported less frequently in myeloid malignancies. Of the cases of BRAF V600E-mutant acute myeloid leukemia (AML) that have been described, most display monocytic morphology and concurrent KMT2A [...] Read more.
Background: Although BRAF V600E mutations are common in solid tumors and select hematologic neoplasms, they are reported less frequently in myeloid malignancies. Of the cases of BRAF V600E-mutant acute myeloid leukemia (AML) that have been described, most display monocytic morphology and concurrent KMT2A rearrangement. Strikingly, all cases have been associated with poor survival. Case Presentation: Here, we report two cases of AML, one diagnosed in an elderly male with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma and the other diagnosed in a young boy previously treated for B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Peripheral blood NGS revealed oncogenic mutations in BRAF p.V600E (VAF = 33%), TET2 p.M508Cfs*25 (VAF = 48%), TET2 p.C211* (VAF = 49%), ZRSR2 p.R295* (VAF = 71%), BRAF p.N581S (VAF = 6%), and EZH2 c.118-2A>G, p.? (VAF = 4%) in case 1 and BRAF p.V600E (VAF = 1%) and KRAS p.G12A (VAF = 28%) in case 2. Cytogenetic workup revealed a complex karyotype in case 1 and an abnormal karyotype with non-clonal aberrations and KMT2A (MLL) rearrangement in case 2. Morphologically, both patients were found to have AML with monocytic features. The post-mortem examination of case 2 also revealed extensive solid organ infiltration, consistent with a monocytic leukemia. Both patients died within days of diagnosis, demonstrating the lethality of this molecular subgroup of AML. Conclusions: Our cases add to the literature, highlighting the poor prognosis of patients diagnosed with BRAF-mutant AML. Although it is uncertain whether the complex karyotype and somatic mutations observed in case 1 and KMT2A rearrangement and variants identified in case 2 may have either independently or cooperatively conferred a poor prognosis, we contend that additional comprehensive studies are needed to further understand the pathophysiology and prognosis of BRAF mutations in AML. We further posit whether patients with BRAF V600E-mutant AML may benefit from the combined use of BRAF inhibitors and/or RAS-pathway-targeting regimens, which are currently FDA-approved for the treatment of BRAF V600-mutant solid tumors and BRAF-mutant histiocytic neoplasms. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Human Genomics and Genetic Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 3001 KiB  
Article
The Target Therapy Hyperbole: “KRAS (p.G12C)”—The Simplification of a Complex Biological Problem
by Massimiliano Chetta, Anna Basile, Marina Tarsitano, Maria Rivieccio, Maria Oro, Nazzareno Capitanio, Nenad Bukvic, Manuela Priolo and Alessandra Rosati
Cancers 2024, 16(13), 2389; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16132389 - 28 Jun 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1848
Abstract
Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog (KRAS) gene variations are linked to the development of numerous cancers, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), colorectal cancer (CRC), and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The lack of typical drug-binding sites has long hampered the discovery of [...] Read more.
Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog (KRAS) gene variations are linked to the development of numerous cancers, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), colorectal cancer (CRC), and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The lack of typical drug-binding sites has long hampered the discovery of therapeutic drugs targeting KRAS. Since “CodeBreaK 100” demonstrated Sotorasib’s early safety and efficacy and led to its approval, especially in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the subsequent identification of specific inhibitors for the p.G12C mutation has offered hope. However, the CodeBreaK 200 study found no significant difference in overall survival (OS) between patients treated with Docetaxel and Sotorasib (AMG 510), adding another degree of complexity to this ongoing challenge. The current study compares the three-dimensional structures of the two major KRAS isoforms, KRAS4A and KRAS4B. It also investigates the probable structural changes caused by the three major mutations (p.G12C, p.G12D, and p.G12V) within Sotorasib’s pocket domain. The computational analysis demonstrates that the wild-type and mutant isoforms have distinct aggregation propensities, resulting in the creation of alternate oligomeric configurations. This study highlights the increased complexity of the biological issue of using KRAS as a therapeutic target. The present study stresses the need for a better understanding of the structural dynamics of KRAS and its mutations to design more effective therapeutic approaches. It also emphasizes the potential of computational approaches to shed light on the complicated molecular pathways that drive KRAS-mediated oncogenesis. This study adds to the ongoing efforts to address the therapeutic hurdles presented by KRAS in cancer treatment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cancer Drug Discovery and Development)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 451 KiB  
Review
A Critical Review of the Impact of SMARCA4 Mutations on Survival Outcomes in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
by Peter Manolakos, Luigi Boccuto and Diana S. Ivankovic
J. Pers. Med. 2024, 14(7), 684; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14070684 - 26 Jun 2024
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3826
Abstract
This critical review investigates the impact of SWI/SNF-related, matrix-associated, actin-dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily A, member 4 (SMARCA4) mutations on survival outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) through an analysis of 21 peer-reviewed articles. Survival analyses across this review demonstrated [...] Read more.
This critical review investigates the impact of SWI/SNF-related, matrix-associated, actin-dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily A, member 4 (SMARCA4) mutations on survival outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) through an analysis of 21 peer-reviewed articles. Survival analyses across this review demonstrated consistently worse outcomes for SMARCA4-mutated vs. SMARCA4 wild-type NSCLC patients, specifically emphasizing class 1 truncating mutations as an independent factor for poor overall survival. In addition, this review explores the clinicopathologic characteristics of SMARCA4 mutations and their impact on various treatment modalities, including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) both with and without Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) co-mutations. The potential ineffectiveness of ICI treatment in NSCLC is explored through the impact of SMARCA4/KRAS co-mutations on the tumor microenvironment. Moreover, this NSCLC review consistently reported statistically worse overall survival outcomes for SMARCA4/KRAS co-mutations than SMARCA4 wild-type/KRAS-mutated cohorts, extending across ICIs, chemo-immunotherapy (CIT), and KRAS G12C inhibitors. Designing prospective clinical SMARCA4-mutated or SMARCA4/KRAS co-mutated NSCLC trials to evaluate targeted therapies and immunotherapy may lead to a better understanding of how to improve cancer patients’ outcomes and survival rates. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Review Special Issue: Recent Advances in Personalized Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop