Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (15)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Cention N

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
14 pages, 486 KiB  
Article
Fluoride Release from Pediatric Dental Restorative Materials: A Laboratory Investigation
by Angelo Aliberti, Roberta Gasparro, Maria Triassi, Mirko Piscopo, Pietro Ausiello and João Paulo Mendes Tribst
Dent. J. 2025, 13(5), 224; https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13050224 - 21 May 2025
Viewed by 543
Abstract
Objectives: Dental caries remains a prevalent issue in pediatric dentistry, necessitating restorative materials that not only repair decay but also provide protective benefits. Fluoride-releasing restorative materials have a key function in preventing recurrent caries by inhibiting bacterial activity and promoting remineralization. The objective [...] Read more.
Objectives: Dental caries remains a prevalent issue in pediatric dentistry, necessitating restorative materials that not only repair decay but also provide protective benefits. Fluoride-releasing restorative materials have a key function in preventing recurrent caries by inhibiting bacterial activity and promoting remineralization. The objective of this study was to examine fluoride release from three pediatric dental restorative materials—Riva Light Cure HV, Fuji IX GP Fast, and the Cention Forte Filling Material—under different pH and temperature conditions. Methods: Specimens (10 mm diameter and 2 mm thickness; n = 3 for each material) were prepared according to the manufacturers’ instructions; immersed in buffer solutions at pH 4.8, 6.8, and 8.8; and stored at 37 °C and 44 °C. Fluoride release was quantified using ion chromatography at three time points (1 day, 7 days, and 28 days). Results: The data revealed that fluoride release was significantly influenced by pH, temperature, and time (p < 0.05). Riva Light Cure HV exhibited the highest release, particularly in acidic conditions (pH 4.8), reaching 40.14 mg/L at 44 °C after 28 days. The Cention Forte Filling Material and Fuji IX GP Fast also showed increased release over time, but with lower cumulative concentrations. Higher temperatures generally enhanced fluoride diffusion across all materials. Conclusions: These findings emphasize the pivotal impact of environmental factors in fluoride release dynamics. Riva Light Cure HV demonstrated superior fluoride release, particularly in acidic environments, suggesting its potential for high-caries-risk pediatric patients. These insights can inform the selection of restorative materials in pediatric dentistry, optimizing caries prevention strategies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Advances in Dental Materials)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 2845 KiB  
Article
Assessment of Fluoride-Releasing Materials in Remineralization of Adjacent Demineralized Enamel
by Onsinee Puttipanampai, Piyaphong Panpisut and Thanya Sitthisettapong
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(4), 2077; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15042077 - 16 Feb 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1166
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the ability of fluoride-releasing restorative materials to remineralize artificially demineralized proximal enamel adjacent to class II restorations. Fifty-four demineralized enamel lesions were created on extracted premolar teeth, and the baseline lesion depth (LD) and mineral density (MD) were [...] Read more.
This study aimed to evaluate the ability of fluoride-releasing restorative materials to remineralize artificially demineralized proximal enamel adjacent to class II restorations. Fifty-four demineralized enamel lesions were created on extracted premolar teeth, and the baseline lesion depth (LD) and mineral density (MD) were measured using micro-CT. The samples were randomly assigned to one of four groups, each in contact with a class II restorative material: Filtek Z350 XT™ (FZ), Cention N® (CN), Fuji II LC® (FJ), or Equia Forte® (EQ). Finally, post 14 days of pH cycling, measurements were taken. SEM, EDX, and Raman Imaging Microscopy were additionally performed. The results showed significant reductions in LD for all fluoride-releasing materials (CN, FJ, EQ). EQ and CN showed a significantly higher percentage change in LD than FZ. The MD of adjacent demineralized enamel increased significantly in all groups. There was no significant difference in the percentage change in MD between groups. SEM-EDX images revealed greater mineral deposition in fluoride-releasing materials than FZ. The Ca/P ratio of demineralized enamel adjacent to CN was equal to that of EQ, while FJ demonstrated the highest ratio. In conclusion, fluoride-releasing materials exhibited a reduction in the LD of adjacent demineralized enamel and demonstrated Ca/P ratios higher than FZ. CN may be an alternative restorative material to remineralize adjacent demineralized enamel. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioactive Dental Materials: A Paradigm Shift in Dentistry?)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1663 KiB  
Article
Effects of Finishing on Surface Roughness of Four Different Glass-Ionomer Cements and One Alkasite: In Vitro Investigation over Time Using Aging Simulation
by Alexander Behlau, Isabelle Behlau, Michael Payer, Gerd Leitinger, Katharina Hanscho, Lumnije Kqiku and Karl Glockner
J. Funct. Biomater. 2024, 15(11), 325; https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb15110325 - 31 Oct 2024
Viewed by 1771
Abstract
In 2017, Europe implemented a ban on amalgam restorations for children aged <15 years and for pregnant/breastfeeding women, highlighting the need for alternative filling materials exhibiting less surface roughness and enhanced longevity. This in vitro study aimed to examine the surface roughness variations [...] Read more.
In 2017, Europe implemented a ban on amalgam restorations for children aged <15 years and for pregnant/breastfeeding women, highlighting the need for alternative filling materials exhibiting less surface roughness and enhanced longevity. This in vitro study aimed to examine the surface roughness variations of five amalgam-replacement materials across three time points and using six finishing methods: (1) no finishing (control), (2) Arkansas burs, (3) diamond burs, (4) tungsten carbide burs, (5) SofLex discs in descending grit size, and (6) coarse SofLex discs combined with silicone polishing. We prepared 960 samples. Each material group, i.e., Cention Forte (CNF), DeltaFil (DLF), Ketac Universal (KTU), IonoStar Molar (ISM), and Equia Forte HT (EQF), comprised 60 samples (n = 10 per finishing method) created using standardized 3D-printed metal molds. Surface roughness (Sa) was measured immediately after finishing, after 30 days of storage in distilled water, and after thermocycling (5000 cycles) using a non-contact profilometer. The results indicate that conventional and hybrid glass-ionomer cements have smoother surfaces than high-viscosity GICs. The DLF and CNF groups exhibited stable outcomes. These findings underscore the importance of selecting appropriate finishing methods based on the restorative material to minimize surface roughness. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomaterials in Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1633 KiB  
Article
The Influence of Ionizing Radiation on Fluoride Release from Restorative Dental Materials: A Comparative In Vitro Study
by Sara Čekalović Agović, Eva Klarić, Ana Ivanišević, Majana Soče, Timor Grego and Irena Radin Nujić
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(21), 9701; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14219701 - 24 Oct 2024
Viewed by 1349
Abstract
To examine the effect of ionizing radiation on fluoride release from restorative dental materials, samples of Equia Forte HT, Fuji Triage, Fuji IX, Cention Forte, Activa Presto, Beautifil II, and Luminos (n = 10) were made in Teflon molds and divided into a [...] Read more.
To examine the effect of ionizing radiation on fluoride release from restorative dental materials, samples of Equia Forte HT, Fuji Triage, Fuji IX, Cention Forte, Activa Presto, Beautifil II, and Luminos (n = 10) were made in Teflon molds and divided into a control group and an experimental group. The experimental group was exposed to ionizing radiation for a total of 35 days (70 Gy, 2 Gy per day). The fluoride release was measured with a fluorine-selective electrode. The median recorded fluoride values were higher with Equia Forte HT, Fuji Triage, and Fuji IX compared to others during the entire period in both groups. With Activa Presto, a higher release of fluoride was recorded in the experimental group on the first day of irradiation, while a higher release was recorded in the control group, as well as with Luminos and Beautifil II. With Cention Forte, there was no significant difference in fluoride release between the experimental and control groups except on the sixth day. With Fuji Triage and Fuji IX, the release of fluoride was higher in the experimental group compared to the control group, while with Equia Forte HT, there was no difference between the groups. In conclusion, ionizing radiation has no major effect on fluoride release in all the tested materials. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Materials and Techniques in Restorative Dentistry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 2465 KiB  
Article
Comparison of Class II Bulk-Fill, Self-Adhesive Composites, Alkasite, and High-Viscosity Glass Ionomer Restorations in Terms of Marginal and Internal Adaptation
by Agnès Sahli, Laurent Daeniker, Isaline Rossier, Luciana Caseiro, Enrico di Bella, Ivo Krejci and Tissiana Bortolotto
Materials 2024, 17(17), 4373; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17174373 - 4 Sep 2024
Viewed by 1478
Abstract
(1) Background: Restoring decayed teeth in young patients can be challenging. This calls for a simplification of the protocols through new biomaterials. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the marginal adaptation delivered by restorative materials applied on class II cavities [...] Read more.
(1) Background: Restoring decayed teeth in young patients can be challenging. This calls for a simplification of the protocols through new biomaterials. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the marginal adaptation delivered by restorative materials applied on class II cavities by using a simplified protocol, before and after fatigue test, followed by the assessment of the internal adaptation. (2) Methods: Forty-eight human teeth were divided into six groups (n = 8). Dentinal fluid simulation was performed before restoring the class II cavities: Gr 1—adhesive (Clearfil Universal Bond Quick) and nanohybrid flowable composite (Clearfil Majesty ES Super Low Flow), Gr 2—adhesive (Clearfil Universal Bond Quick) and nanohybrid composite (Clearfil Majesty ES standard), Gr 3—bulk fill self-adhesive composite (Surefil One), Gr 4—bioactive powder-liquid filling material (Cention Forte), Gr 5—universal adhesive (Adhese Universal) and nanohybrid composite resin (Tetric Powerfill); and control group (CT)—high-viscosity glass ionomer (Equia Forte). Marginal adaptation was observed with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and compared before and after a fatigue test consisting of repeated thermal and mechanical cycles. The specimens were then cut mesio-distally, and internal adaptation was undertaken using SEM again. Repeated measures and one way ANOVA followed by a Fisher’s LSD test and Fisher’s LSD post hoc test were used in order to compare the statistically significant differences among groups. (3) Results: As for the marginal adaptation after loading, Cention Forte (58%) and Equia Forte HT (53%) were statistically equivalent and presented the highest results, followed by Clearfil Majesty ES Standard (32%) and Tetric Powerfill (27%), with Surefil One (8%) and Clearfil Majesty ES Flow Super Low (7%) showing the worst results. In terms of internal adaptation, Cention Forte (85%) and Clearfil Majesty ES Standard (74%) had the highest percentages of continuous margins. Tetric powerfill (56%) and Equia Forte HT (44%) showed statistically significantly lower results, followed by Clearfil Majesty ES Flow Super Low (33%) and eventually Surefil One (17%). (4) Conclusions: This in vitro study showed promising results for the marginal and internal adaptation of alkasite dual cured Cention Forte in the restoration of class II cavities. This material could be considered an interesting restorative alternative for the restoration of deciduous teeth. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 3837 KiB  
Article
The Influence of Ionizing Radiation on the Morphological Structure of the Fluoride-Releasing Restorative Materials in Cancer Patients: An In Vitro Study
by Eva Klarić, Bruno Špiljak, Luka Šimunović, Majana Soče, Timor Grego and Ana Ivanišević
Sci 2024, 6(3), 47; https://doi.org/10.3390/sci6030047 - 7 Aug 2024
Viewed by 1736
Abstract
Radiotherapy plays a key role in the treatment of the early and advanced stages of head and neck cancer. To date, there is still no consensus on the effects of radiotherapy on the mechanical properties of fluoride-releasing restorative materials which can be used [...] Read more.
Radiotherapy plays a key role in the treatment of the early and advanced stages of head and neck cancer. To date, there is still no consensus on the effects of radiotherapy on the mechanical properties of fluoride-releasing restorative materials which can be used in patients undergoing radiotherapy with increased incidence of caries. The fluoride-releasing materials Equia Forte HT and Cention N were compared to the resin-based materials Tetric EvoCeram and Tetric Power Fill. Standard irradiation was performed with a linear accelerator. Vickers microhardness, mass, surface roughness and color were measured before and after irradiation. Cention N and Tetric PowerFill showed stability in the mass, while the surface roughness did not change in any of the examined groups. Resistance to microhardness change was shown by Cention N, Tetric PowerFill and Tetric EvoCeram, and the color change was significant in all groups (p < 0.05). It should be remembered that patients receiving head and neck radiation therapy may experience adverse effects from the treatment, including changes in the mechanical properties of the restorative materials. The obtained results suggest that Cention N can be used as a material in patients undergoing head and neck radiotherapy due to the mechanical stability and depo effect of fluoride release. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1346 KiB  
Article
Effect of the Different Dietary Supplements on the Average Surface Roughness and Color Stability of Direct Restorative Materials Used in Pediatric Dentistry
by Nagehan Aktaş, Yasemin Akın, Cenkhan Bal, Mehmet Bani and Merve Bankoğlu Güngör
Children 2024, 11(6), 645; https://doi.org/10.3390/children11060645 - 27 May 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2210
Abstract
Increased surface roughness and discoloration of the direct restorative materials used in pediatric patients affect the longevity of restorations and impair children’s oral health. Many factors can alter these properties. One of these factors is the intake of dietary supplements. It is crucial [...] Read more.
Increased surface roughness and discoloration of the direct restorative materials used in pediatric patients affect the longevity of restorations and impair children’s oral health. Many factors can alter these properties. One of these factors is the intake of dietary supplements. It is crucial to predict the properties of restorative materials when exposed to dietary supplements to maintain the dental care of children. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the effect of various syrup-formed dietary supplements on the average surface roughness and color stability of current restorative materials used in pediatric dentistry. Seven different restorative materials (conventional glass ionomer [Fuji IX GP], resin-modified glass ionomer, [Fuji II LC], zirconia-reinforced glass ionomer [Zirconomer Improved], polyacid-modified composite resin [Dyract®XTRA], bulk-fill glass hybrid restorative [Equia Forte HT Fill], conventional resin composite [Charisma Smart], and resin composite with reactive glass fillers [Cention N]) were tested. The specimens prepared from each type of restorative material were divided into five subgroups according to dietary supplements (Sambucol Kids, Resverol, Imunol, Umca, and Microfer). These specimens were immersed daily in supplement solution over a period of 28 days. Surface roughness and color difference measurements were performed at baseline and at the 7th and 28th days. The color difference and Ra values showed that there was an interaction among the type of restorative material, type of dietary supplement, and immersion time factors (p < 0.05). Whereas lower Ra values were found in the composite resin group, the highest Ra values were found in the conventional glass ionomer group. All supplements caused increasing color difference values, and Resverol and Umca showed higher discoloration values above the clinically acceptable threshold. The intake of dietary supplement type, the immersion time of the dietary supplement, and the restorative material type affected the surface roughness and color stability of the tested direct restorative materials. All of the experimental groups showed higher Ra values than clinically acceptable surface roughness values (0.2 µm). The color difference values also increased with the immersion time. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 3104 KiB  
Article
Effects of Ion-Releasing Materials on Dentine: Analysis of Microhardness, Appearance, and Chemical Composition
by Ivan Šalinović, Falk Schwendicke, Haitham Askar, Jamila Yassine and Ivana Miletić
Materials 2023, 16(23), 7310; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16237310 - 24 Nov 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 1772
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare the potential of standard ion-releasing materials to repair demineralized lesions with recently introduced alkasite and glass hybrid materials. Glass ionomer (GC Fuji TRIAGE), two glass hybrids (EQUIA Forte HT, Riva SC), calcium silicate cement (Biodentine) [...] Read more.
The aim of this study was to compare the potential of standard ion-releasing materials to repair demineralized lesions with recently introduced alkasite and glass hybrid materials. Glass ionomer (GC Fuji TRIAGE), two glass hybrids (EQUIA Forte HT, Riva SC), calcium silicate cement (Biodentine) and an alkasite (Cention Forte) were tested. A total of 72 human third molars were used for sample preparation; on the dentine surface, a class-I cavity was prepared, and one half was covered with nail varnish. The teeth were subjected to a demineralization protocol, filled with the examined materials, and cut in half. The evaluation included a dentine microhardness assessment (n = 10) and SEM/EDS analysis (n = 2). The results were analyzed using SPSS 22.0 statistical software and compared using an analysis of variance and Scheffe post-hoc test. The statistical significance level was set to 0.05. Mean microhardness values (HV0.1) after 14 and 28 days were, respectively: EQUIA Forte HT (26.7 ± 1.45 and 37.74 ± 1.56), Riva Self Cure (19.66 ± 1.02 and 29.58 ± 1.18), Cention Forte (19.01 ± 1.24 and 27.93 ± 1.33), Biodentine (23.35 ± 1.23 and 29.92 ± 1.02), GC Fuji TRIAGE (25.94 ± 1.35 and 33.87 ± 5.57) and control group (15.57 ± 0.68 and 15.64 ± 0.82). The results were significantly different between most groups (p < 0.001). SEM/EDS revealed varying patterns, material deposits and distinct elemental variations. To conclude, all materials increased microhardness and affected the dentine surface appearance and chemical composition; EQUIA Forte HT demonstrated the most pronounced effects. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioactive Dental Materials)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 8313 KiB  
Article
Inhibition of Caries around Restoration by Ion-Releasing Restorative Materials: An In Vitro Optical Coherence Tomography and Micro-Computed Tomography Evaluation
by Eman H. Albelasy, Ruoqiong Chen, Alex Fok, Marmar Montasser, Hamdi H. Hamama, Salah H. Mahmoud, Tamer Abdelrehim and Hooi Pin Chew
Materials 2023, 16(16), 5558; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16165558 - 10 Aug 2023
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 2247
Abstract
The objective of this study was firstly to assess the demineralization inhibitory effect of ion-releasing restorations in enamel adjacent to restoration using a biofilm caries model and secondly to compare the effect to that in a chemical caries model. Fifty-six bovine incisors were [...] Read more.
The objective of this study was firstly to assess the demineralization inhibitory effect of ion-releasing restorations in enamel adjacent to restoration using a biofilm caries model and secondly to compare the effect to that in a chemical caries model. Fifty-six bovine incisors were filled with either Surefil one (SuO), Cention N (CN) (both ion-releasing materials), Ketac-Molar (GIC) or Powerfill resin composite (RC). The restored teeth were then randomly divided into 2 groups according to the used caries model (biofilm or chemical caries model). The micro-computed tomography (MicroCt) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) outcome measures used to evaluate demineralization inhibition effects were lesion depth, LD and increase in OCT integrated reflectivity, ΔIR, at five different depths. It was observed that all outcome measures of CN were statistically the same as those of GIC and conversely with those of RC. This was also the case for SuO except for LD, which was statistically the same as RC. When comparing the two caries models, LD of the biofilm model was statistically deeper (p < 0.05) than the chemical model for all four materials. In conclusion, CN and SuO have similar demineralization inhibitory effects as GIC, and the biofilm caries model is more discriminatory in differentiating demineralization inhibitory effects of ion-releasing restorative material. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Dental Restorative Materials (Volume II))
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 277 KiB  
Article
Fluoride and Calcium Release from Alkasite and Glass Ionomer Restorative Dental Materials: In Vitro Study
by Alessandro Di Lauro, Fabiana Di Duca, Paolo Montuori, Amanda Maria de Oliveira Dal Piva, João Paulo Mendes Tribst, Alexandre Luiz Souto Borges and Pietro Ausiello
J. Funct. Biomater. 2023, 14(2), 109; https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb14020109 - 15 Feb 2023
Cited by 23 | Viewed by 3356
Abstract
This study evaluated the effect of pH and temperature on the ion (F and Ca2+) release of a resin-based material containing alkaline fillers and a self-setting high-viscous glass ionomer cement. Disks were prepared according to manufacturers’ instructions for both materials: [...] Read more.
This study evaluated the effect of pH and temperature on the ion (F and Ca2+) release of a resin-based material containing alkaline fillers and a self-setting high-viscous glass ionomer cement. Disks were prepared according to manufacturers’ instructions for both materials: the EF group (Equia Forte HT filling, GC) and the CN group (Cention N, Ivoclar). Specimens were immersed in 50 mL buffer solution with three different pHs (4.8, 6.8, and 8.8), and stored at 0°, 18°, 37°, and 44 °C. After 24 h, 7 d, and 28 d, cumulative F and Ca2+ releases were analyzed by chromatography and mass spectrometry, and pH was measured. Both materials showed minimal changes in pH with final values after 28 d of 5.17 ± 0.56 for CN and 5.12 ± 0.24 for EF. In all experimental conditions, the percentages of ion release were higher for EF than for CF. In particular, both materials showed a significant difference in temperature in F release. Regardless of the pH values, the highest Ca2+ ion release was after 28 days, with a significant difference in temperature for CN and EF. Within the limit of this study, the temperature storage influenced ion release and the high-viscous glass ionomer showed the maximum values. Full article
15 pages, 597 KiB  
Article
Comparison between Restorative Materials for Pulpotomised Deciduous Molars: A Randomized Clinical Study
by Kanwalpreet Kaur, Bharat Suneja, Sunaina Jodhka, Ravinder S. Saini, Saurabh Chaturvedi, Shashit Shetty Bavabeedu, Fahad Hussain Alhamoudi, Marco Cicciù and Giuseppe Minervini
Children 2023, 10(2), 284; https://doi.org/10.3390/children10020284 - 1 Feb 2023
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 4157
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes of Cention-N (CN) and stainless steel crowns (SSCs) as restorations for pulpotomised primary molars, and to study clinical and radiographic outcomes of pulpotomies restored with these materials. Methods: The study was conducted on 60 pulpotomised [...] Read more.
Aim: To evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes of Cention-N (CN) and stainless steel crowns (SSCs) as restorations for pulpotomised primary molars, and to study clinical and radiographic outcomes of pulpotomies restored with these materials. Methods: The study was conducted on 60 pulpotomised molars with occlusoproximal caries. These were randomly divided into two groups and restored with either stainless steel crowns or Cention-N. Clinical performance of restorations and clinical and radiographic success of pulpotomy was examined at 6, 9 and 12 months. Results: The mean scores for marginal integrity deteriorated significantly at 6, 9 and 12 months in both groups but in comparison were insignificant. The mean for proximal contact deteriorated significantly for the Cention-N group, whereas the mean for gingival health deteriorated remarkably for the stainless steel crown group at successive evaluations. No tooth in either group showed secondary caries or discomfort on biting, except for one tooth in Cention-N group which presented with secondary caries. The clinical success rate for pulpotomised molars was 100% for both groups until nine months, although this had reduced by the end of 12 months. Radiographically, the success rate was 79.3% for Cention-N, while it was 86.6% for stainless steel crowns at 12 months. There was no significant difference in clinical and radiographic success between either group. Conclusion: Cention-N and stainless steel crowns are comparable for marginal integrity. However, crowns maintain significantly better proximal contacts while Cention-N was notably better for gingival health of the restored tooth. Both materials do not show secondary caries and discomfort on biting and are comparable in clinical and radiographic success of pulpotomy at the end of one year. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Advance in Pediatric Dentistry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1553 KiB  
Article
In Vitro Comparison of Surface Roughness, Flexural, and Microtensile Strength of Various Glass-Ionomer-Based Materials and a New Alkasite Restorative Material
by Alper Kaptan, Fatih Oznurhan and Merve Candan
Polymers 2023, 15(3), 650; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15030650 - 27 Jan 2023
Cited by 17 | Viewed by 3204
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the physical properties of Cention N and various glass-ionomer-based materials in vitro. The groups were obtained as follows: Group 1 (LC-Cent): light-cured Cention N; Group 2 (SC-Cent): self-cured Cention N; Group 3 (COMP): composite (3M Universal Restorative 200); [...] Read more.
This study aims to evaluate the physical properties of Cention N and various glass-ionomer-based materials in vitro. The groups were obtained as follows: Group 1 (LC-Cent): light-cured Cention N; Group 2 (SC-Cent): self-cured Cention N; Group 3 (COMP): composite (3M Universal Restorative 200); Group 4 (DYRA): compomer (Dyract XP); Group 5 (LINER): Glass Liner; Group 6 (FUJI): FujiII LC Capsule; and Group 7 (NOVA): Nova Glass LC. For the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) test, 21 extracted human molar teeth were used. The enamel of the teeth was removed, and flat dentin surfaces were obtained. Materials were applied up to 3 mm, and sticks were obtained from the teeth. Additionally, specimens were prepared, and their flexural strength and surface roughness (Ra) were evaluated. Herein, data were recorded using SPSS 22.0, and the flexural strength, μTBS, and Ra were statistically analyzed. According to the surface roughness tests, the highest Ra values were observed in Group 6 (FUJI) (0.33 ± 0.1), whereas the lowest Ra values were observed in Group 2 (SC-Cent) (0.17 ± 0.04) (p < 0.05). The flexural strengths of the materials were compared, and the highest value was obtained in Group 2 (SC-Cent) (86.32 ± 15.37), whereas the lowest value was obtained in Group 5 (LINER) (41.75 ± 10.05) (p < 0.05). When the μTBS of materials to teeth was evaluated, the highest μTBS was observed in Group 3 (COMP) (16.50 ± 7.73) and Group 4 (DYRA) (16.36 ± 4.64), whereas the lowest μTBS was found in Group 7 (NOVA) (9.88 ± 1.87) (p < 0.05). According to the μTBS results of materials-to-materials bonding, both Group 2 (SC-Cent) and Group 1 (LC-Cent) made the best bonding with Group 3 (COMP) (p < 0.05). It can be concluded that self-cured Cention N had the highest flexural strength and lowest surface roughness of the seven materials tested. Although the bond strength was statistically lower than conventional composites and compomers, it was similar to resin-modified glass ionomer cements. Additionally, the best material-to-material bonding was found between self-cured Cention N and conventional composites. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Horizons in Nanofillers Based Polymer Composites II)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 243 KiB  
Article
Clinical Performance of CentionTM Alkasite Restorative Material vs. Glass Ionomer Cement Used in Deciduous Teeth: One-Year Evaluation
by Giacomo Derchi, Vincenzo Marchio, Maria Rita Giuca and Lisa Lardani
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(21), 10845; https://doi.org/10.3390/app122110845 - 26 Oct 2022
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 3470
Abstract
Conservative dentistry in primary dentition aims to remove and repair existing carious lesions and to prevent secondary caries up until exfoliation of the primary tooth happens, in order to maintain the important role in terms of the space maintenance and guidance for eruption [...] Read more.
Conservative dentistry in primary dentition aims to remove and repair existing carious lesions and to prevent secondary caries up until exfoliation of the primary tooth happens, in order to maintain the important role in terms of the space maintenance and guidance for eruption that deciduous teeth have. Many different materials are used, and some of them, recently commercialized, show bioactive properties able to prevent secondary caries. This trial’s primary focus is to evaluate the biological, functional, and aesthetic characteristics of Cention-N alkasite material compared to glass ionomer cement (GIC) through the use of standardized FDI criteria for direct restorations. A blinded, split-mouth study was designed for this purpose, including 112 deciduous molars in 45 children showing class II caries restored with either GIC or alkasite material. The data from this study indicates that the Cention-N alkasite material showed equal performance compared with Fuji IX GIC after one year. A thorough evaluation of exfoliated teeth restored with this material will provide long-term data and an evaluation on infiltration rates. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Application of Nanomaterials in Dentistry)
12 pages, 2331 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of the Bond Strength and Cytotoxicity of Alkasite Restorative Material
by Mohamed M. Awad, Turki Alshehri, Ahmed M. Alqarni, Nashaat M. Magdy, Feras Alhalabi, Dalal Alotaibi and Ali Alrahlah
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(18), 6175; https://doi.org/10.3390/app10186175 - 4 Sep 2020
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 5610
Abstract
Cention N (CN; Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein), advertised as an alkasite, is a bioactive bulk-fill resin-based composite (BF-RBC) with alkaline fillers. This study evaluated the resin-dentin micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) and cytotoxicity of CN. Methods: Flat dentin surfaces were obtained, bonded with a [...] Read more.
Cention N (CN; Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein), advertised as an alkasite, is a bioactive bulk-fill resin-based composite (BF-RBC) with alkaline fillers. This study evaluated the resin-dentin micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) and cytotoxicity of CN. Methods: Flat dentin surfaces were obtained, bonded with a universal adhesive, and randomly distributed into two groups. CN (group I) and a flowable BF-RBC, namely, Tetric N-Flow Bulk Fill, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein (group II), were used. After thermocycling, bonded samples were sectioned into micro-beams for μTBS evaluation. Resin-based composite (RBC) discs with a thickness of 2 and 4 mm were tested on human gingival fibroblast cells (HGFCs). Cytotoxicity was assessed by cell viability and growth using AlamarBlue® (Biosource, Camarillo, CA, USA) over a seven-day period. Independent t-test was utilized to statistically analyze μTBS data, while one- and two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s post-hoc tests were utilized to analyze the cell viability data. Results: There was no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05) in the μTBS between the flowable BF-RBC and CN. For both materials, the HGFCs were viable, with constant growing over the seven-day period. Conclusion: CN provided a resin-dentin μTBS that was comparable to that provided by the flowable BF-RBC. Both materials showed acceptable cytotoxicity over the seven-day period at a thickness of both 2 and 4 mm. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Developments and Applications of Dental Materials)
Show Figures

Figure 1

28 pages, 12628 KiB  
Review
Commercially Available Fluoride-Releasing Restorative Materials: A Review and a Proposal for Classification
by Philippe Francois, Vincent Fouquet, Jean-Pierre Attal and Elisabeth Dursun
Materials 2020, 13(10), 2313; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13102313 - 18 May 2020
Cited by 141 | Viewed by 9887
Abstract
Resin composite and glass ionomer cement (GIC) are the most commonly used dental materials to perform direct restorations. Both have specific characteristics that explain their popularity and their limits. More than 20 years ago, the first attempt (followed by others) to combine the [...] Read more.
Resin composite and glass ionomer cement (GIC) are the most commonly used dental materials to perform direct restorations. Both have specific characteristics that explain their popularity and their limits. More than 20 years ago, the first attempt (followed by others) to combine the advantages of these two families was performed with compomers, but it was not very successful. Recently, new formulations (also called ‘smart materials’) with claimed ion release properties have been proposed under different family names, but there are few studies on them and explanations of their chemistries. This comprehensive review aims to gather the compositions; the setting reactions; the mechanical, self-adhesive, and potential bulk-fill properties; and the ion release abilities of the large existing families of fluoride-releasing restorative materials and the new restorative materials to precisely describe their characteristics, their eventual bioactivities, and classify them for an improved understanding of these materials. Based on this work, the whole GIC family, including resin-modified and highly viscous formulations, was found to be bioactive. Cention N (Ivoclar Vivadent, AG, Schaan, Lietschentein) is the first commercially available bioactive resin composite. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop