Search Results (3,294)

The proposition that expanding education uniformly advances the 2030 Agenda is widely held in policy discourse—embedded in SDG 4, amplified by UNESCO, and routinely invoked in national development strategies. This paper shows that this proposition holds only partially. Using a balanced panel of 193 countries observed over 2000–2023, we estimate 96 two-way fixed-effects regressions connecting eight measures of education—spanning expenditure, enrolment, completion, attainment, and accumulated stock—to twelve Sustainable Development Goal outcomes. The estimates reveal a pronounced block asymmetry. On the social side, educational expansion is a robust correlate of progress against poverty: a one-standard-deviation increase in secondary enrolment is associated with a 0.16-log-point lower $2.15/day extreme-poverty headcount and a 4.35-point lower value on the 0–100 SDG-1 composite, both significant at p < 0.001. On the environmental side, the same education measure is associated with a coefficient of β = +0.048 (p = 0.014) on production-based CO₂ per capita and β = −0.260 (p = 0.031) on forest area—associations that are statistically significant but directionally perverse, though small in magnitude (approximately 0.05–0.26 SD on the standardised outcome). Higher schooling is also associated with higher within-country inequality (β = +0.71 on the Gini, p = 0.006). The asymmetry survives Driscoll–Kraay standard errors, Oster sensitivity bounds, and two-year lagged specifications. The findings qualify the optimistic narrative that frames education as a uniform instrument for sustainable development: schooling is a robust predictor of social-block progress, but appears insufficient on its own for environmental progress and is best understood as a complement to, rather than a substitute for, dedicated environmental policy. The 2030 architecture may benefit from differentiated instrument–goal pairs rather than reliance on any single instrument across all goals. Full article

This study examines the impact of ESG disclosure, leverage, and profitability on firm value, measured by Tobin’s Q, among 67 non-financial Tadawul-listed companies in Saudi Arabia over the period 2015–2024. ESG disclosure is captured through a manual content-analysis index that scores the proportion of expected environmental, social, and governance items reported by each firm. The study further investigates whether board independence moderates these relationships while controlling for liquidity, firm size, current ratio, capital expenditure, and board size. Methodologically, the study employs the two-step system generalized method of moments (system GMM) estimator, which addresses dynamic persistence, endogeneity, and unobserved heterogeneity. The findings reveal that ESG disclosure has a positive and significant effect on firm value, indicating that the Saudi market increasingly rewards firms that provide broader sustainability-related information. Profitability also exerts a positive influence on Tobin’s Q, while leverage has a negative and significant effect, suggesting that higher debt weakens market valuation. Among the moderating effects, board independence significantly reduces the negative impact of leverage on firm value, although it does not significantly strengthen the positive ESG disclosure–firm value relationship. The results also show that liquidity, firm size, capital expenditure, and board size positively influence firm value. The study’s novelty lies in being the first, to our knowledge, to integrate ESG disclosure, financial structure, profitability, and board independence within a single dynamic firm-value framework over a decade-long panel that brackets the Saudi Exchange’s 2021 ESG disclosure guideline. In doing so, it advances emerging-market ESG research by showing that, under Saudi Arabia’s largely voluntary disclosure regime and concentrated-ownership structure, board independence operates primarily as a risk-monitoring mechanism rather than as an amplifier of disclosure value. The findings imply that regulators should strengthen and progressively mandate ESG reporting frameworks, that investors should treat ESG transparency as value-relevant information, and that firms should view ESG transparency and prudent governance as strategic tools for enhancing market value in line with Vision 2030. Full article

This study discusses the influence of Digital Leadership (DL) on Sustainable Innovation Performance (SIP) in telecommunications companies. In addition to examining the direct effect of Digital Leadership, the study focuses on the mediating roles of Knowledge Sharing (KS) and Employee Engagement (EE). A sample of 412 employees was collected by a simple cross-sectional survey. A partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) approach was used for analyzing results. The study reveals that Digital Leadership directly and positively enhanced Knowledge Sharing but did not lead to a significant direct influence on Employee Engagement and Sustainable Innovation Performance. Moreover, Knowledge Sharing did not significantly influencing Sustainable Innovation Performance, a condition that was the strongest predictor of Sustainable Innovation Performance emerging from Employee Engagement. The mediation analysis shows that neither Knowledge Sharing nor Employee Engagement mediates the relationship between Digital Leadership and Sustainable Innovation Performance. The objective contribution of this study is to shed light on the idea that Digital Leadership and Sustainable Innovation Performance are not directly related but may instead reflect other circumstances or contextual conditions. The research offers practice advice in showing that Employee Engagement benefits organizational sustainable innovation results by urging companies to consider not only Digital Leadership strategies but also alternative strategies that foster employee involvement. Full article

Although sustainability has consolidated as a central criterion of value and performance in project management, a deep gap persists between its conceptual recognition and its effective application, making it difficult to structure and measure its real scope. Faced with this complexity, this study aims to dimension sustainable project management in productive sectors by analyzing its strategic alignment and operational trends. Methodologically, the research relies on a meta-aggregative review of 124 articles, integrating qualitative synthesis with quantitative structural analysis to decipher how the field is operationalized. Qualitatively, the results reveal that sustainability redefines project success, shifting toward the integral generation of long-term economic, social, and environmental value, contingent upon its anchoring in corporate strategy, governance, and the project lifecycle. However, quantitative analysis exposes an inherent thematic multidimensionality. The Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) model identifies multiple simultaneous dimensions (entropy = 0.74), and the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) explains 27.24% of the cumulative variance. While these values align with the standard benchmarks for high-dimensional textual data, they empirically represent a highly complex and distributed knowledge structure rather than a unified theoretical framework. Consequently, while consolidated nuclei exist around management and governance, critical empirical gaps persist regarding risk integration, performance metrics, and, particularly, the circular economy. It is concluded that, although the discipline enjoys high theoretical legitimacy and growing measurement capabilities, its integration into operational decision-making remains partial. The ultimate challenge lies in articulating conceptual knowledge, tangible metrics, and strategic governance, ensuring that sustainability evolves from a declarative ideal into the inescapable, cross-cutting operational framework of project management. Full article

Cultural heritage is a critical pillar of identity, social cohesion and continuity within ethnocultural communities. However, the preservation of cultural heritage across Southern Africa is largely constrained by fragmented colonial policy implementation, and limited community engagement. This study critically examines the application of the Evidence-Based Policy and Practice (EBPP) model as a decolonizing framework for sustainable management of cultural heritage. The study conducts a structured scoping review of literature to explore the integration of EBPP with the principles of Collective Benefit, Authority to Control, Responsibility, Ethics (CARE), and the principles of Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable (FAIR) to support inclusive and ethical governance. The findings of the study reveal that sustainable management of cultural heritage is dependent upon community-led governance, alignment between research, policy, and practice, and strengthening of intellectual property protections. The study identifies persistent gaps in the operationalization of indigenous knowledge policies and highlighted the need for participatory approaches to ensure the long-term sustainability of cultural heritage. The study argues that the integration of EBPP, alongside the principles of CARE and FAIR, significantly enhances accountability, fosters data sovereignty, and supports the decolonization of knowledge systems. Thus, the study makes a significant contribution to the growing global discourse on sustainable development by positioning cultural heritage as a dynamic resource for social transformation. Full article

Understanding the factors that shape firms’ borrowing costs has become increasingly important amid growing concerns about corporate transparency, sustainability, and tax practices. Specifically, the study investigates the relationship between tax avoidance (TA) and the cost of debt (CoD) among non-financial firms listed on an emerging Stock Exchange, while examining the moderating effect of environmental, social, and governance disclosure (ESG disclosure) based on the Panel-Corrected Standard Error (PCSE) approach. The findings indicate a significant positive association between TA and CoD, suggesting that lenders perceive aggressive tax practices as a source of additional risk, which consequently increases borrowing costs. The results further show that ESG disclosure plays a moderating role in this relationship, as the positive effect of TA on borrowing costs becomes weaker among firms with higher levels of ESG disclosure. This implies that stronger ESG disclosure improves transparency and alleviates creditors’ concerns about firms’ tax-related behavior. The findings were further validated through robustness checks using alternative CoD measures, fixed-effects regression, and dynamic panel GMM estimations to address endogeneity concerns. The study contributes to the literature by providing evidence from an emerging market and highlighting the role of ESG disclosure in mitigating the negative financial effects of TA. Full article

This paper addresses the critical challenge of accelerating the adoption of sustainable innovations by examining the interdependence between managerial credibility and consumer pragmatism. The aim of the study was to investigate how perceived trust in management influences purchase intention, specifically analysing both the mediating role of financial perceptions and the moderating effect of digital literacy. The study had a quantitative approach, with data being collected from 408 Romanian respondents. The statistical analysis was performed using JASP software (version 0.96.0.0), applying both multiple and simple linear regression as well as a mediation analysis (SEM). The results indicate that both perceived trust in management and the perception of innovation as an investment directly stimulate purchase intention such that that credible management can convince consumers of the financial benefits. However, even though digital literacy plays a fundamental role in consumers’ lives, it does not affect the relationship between managers’ credibility and the willingness to buy sustainable products. The paper concludes that for sustainable innovations to be financially successful, organisations must move beyond the green labelling and focus on building genuine strategic credibility. Therefore, these findings offer valuable insights for both managers and policymakers in their efforts to support the transition to a more sustainable market. Full article

This study aims to address the need to operationalize Industry 5.0 (I5.0) by developing a comprehensive Assessment Framework for the adoption of the Human Centricity, Environmental Sustainability, and Industrial Resilience pillars. While existing models largely focus on technological maturity, they fail to provide measurable tools for evaluating I5.0 adoption. To bridge this gap, the paper proposes an Assessment Framework based on a structured set of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) developed within the EU-funded PROSPECTS 5.0 project. The methodology combines an extensive literature review, a workshop with relevant stakeholders, a Delphi survey with experts, and empirical refinement conducted through workshops involving 14 companies across multiple sectors and of varying sizes. The results highlight that organizations predominantly measure traditional indicators such as health and safety, energy consumption, and supply chain robustness, while underestimating emerging dimensions such as human empowerment, social inclusion, circularity, and advanced human–machine collaboration. The framework introduces a set of KPIs for each of the I5.0 pillars, supporting structured assessment across different industrial contexts while allowing sector-specific adaptation. The findings reveal a gap between the perceived importance of several sustainability and human-centric metrics and their actual implementation. This framework allows organizations to self-assess their practices, guide strategic decisions, and align technological growth with societal and environmental goals. Full article

Firms are increasingly expected to pursue multiple sustainability priorities, but the implementation consequences of expanding sustainability agendas remain insufficiently understood. This study investigates whether and how sustainability overload reduces sustainability execution consistency. Drawing on the attention-based view and the corporate sustainability tensions perspective, the study proposes that a broad and simultaneous sustainability agenda exceeds managers’ attentional and coordination capacity, thereby weakening implementation coherence across departments. Specifically, the study hypothesizes that sustainability overload increases managerial attention strain, which in turn increases interunit priority divergence, ultimately reducing sustainability execution consistency. To test this sequential mechanism, a randomized experimental vignette study was conducted with 300 middle- and senior-level managers working in Türkiye-based firms operating in sustainability-exposed sectors. Participants were assigned to either a focused sustainability strategy condition or an overloaded sustainability strategy condition. The results support all proposed hypotheses. The overloaded condition increased managerial attention strain and interunit priority divergence, while reducing perceived sustainability execution consistency. PROCESS Model 6 analysis confirmed the sequential mediation mechanism. The findings suggest that sustainability implementation depends not only on the breadth of sustainability goals, but also on whether these goals are organized through a manageable priority architecture. The study contributes to sustainability strategy implementation research by highlighting managerial attention and cross-functional divergence as mechanisms linking sustainability overload to execution inconsistency. Full article

This study introduces a comprehensive framework for understanding sustainable online shopping preferences, validated using survey data collected in Serbia and Slovenia in 2025 (n = 572), thereby enhancing its generalizability. The primary aim of this research is to examine the extent to which specific environmental, social, and economic indicators influence decision-making processes for online purchasing and delivery. A detailed quantitative analysis was conducted using a structured questionnaire that included a wide range of variables related to online shopping behaviors and delivery preferences. The findings indicate that preferences for sustainability are inherently complex and multifaceted, shaped by critical factors such as environmental concerns, social responsibility, trust, skepticism towards sustainability claims, willingness to pay (WTP), and price sensitivity. Demographic variables, particularly gender and age, show consistent links to preferences for environmental considerations and corporate social responsibility (CSR), while income impacts trust-related behaviors and WTP. Furthermore, the analysis distinguishes between two distinct decision-making approaches: a value-driven sustainability cluster represented by EcoIndex, SocialIndex, and WTPIndex, and a cost-minimization strategy focused on price sensitivity (PriceIndex), with trust acting as a related yet separate factor (CredibilityIndex). Overall, this study emphasizes that a range of interconnected dimensions significantly shape sustainable online shopping preferences. The study was conducted in two developing European countries. Additionally, the findings highlight the need to address universal market barriers, such as price sensitivity, information asymmetry, and consumer skepticism. In a business context, they underscore the importance of adopting advanced analytical methods to enhance decision-making and optimize sustainable business strategies. Full article

Achieving sustainability in the manufacturing sector calls for systemic reductions in energy consumption and carbon emissions without compromising productivity. In the global energy consumption landscape, the manufacturing sector accounts for a significant proportion and is a major source of carbon emissions, with manufacturing systems and HVAC (Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning) systems being the principal energy consumers. Existing research typically optimizes these two systems independently, neglecting their dynamic coupling; production scheduling determines equipment power and heat dissipation, which alters building thermal loads and consequently affects HVAC energy consumption. To address this problem and advance sustainable manufacturing practices, this study proposes an energy-aware scheduling framework integrating manufacturing and HVAC control. A WOA-XGBoost energy consumption prediction model is constructed, employing the Whale Optimization Algorithm to tune XGBoost hyperparameters, achieving a prediction accuracy of R² = 0.937 on the Shanghai typical meteorological year dataset. The HVAC decision variables are defined as five operational control variables—supply air flow rate, fan total pressure, ERV sensible/latent heat recovery effectiveness, and ventilation air flow rate—ensuring the physical realizability of scheduling solutions. An integrated scheduling-and-control model incorporating production capacity constraints and electricity demand response is then formulated and solved using a hybrid Particle Swarm Optimization algorithm. Validation on a five-machine, four-buffer flow shop demonstrates that the proposed framework reduces total electricity cost by 8.85% and total energy consumption by 14.88% in summer compared with a physics-based coupling baseline, with all metrics exhibiting coefficients of variation below 4% across ten independent runs. These results demonstrate that the proposed data-driven framework provides a practical and scalable pathway toward sustainable manufacturing by jointly reducing energy use and associated carbon emissions while maintaining full production throughput. Full article

This study aims to investigate the effect of organizational identification (OI) on green organizational behavior (GOB) and the mediating role of psychological well-being (PWB) in this relationship. To achieve this research goal, a quantitative study was conducted using a structured questionnaire designed to assess the relevant variables. Data was collected from 264 white-collar employees in the service sector in Istanbul. Surveys were collected from participants face-to-face, using a judgmental sampling method. Hypotheses were tested using AMOS22, SPSS 24 and PROCESS Macro. The significance of indirect effects was analyzed by employing the bootstrapping technique. The results indicate that OI has positive and significant direct effects on GOB and PWB. Furthermore, PWB was found to significantly predict GOB. The bootstrapping analysis revealed that the indirect effect was significant, supporting a partial mediation model. This research illustrates that OI increases GOB both directly and indirectly through PWB. The findings are considered to be of relevance to the literature because this is one of the few studies that addresses the concept of green organizational behavior, which is a focal point in the organizational behavior literature, and it emphasizes the importance of psychological resources in promoting environmentally friendly behaviors within organizations. Full article

Although Industry 4.0 has successfully advanced lean manufacturing through digitalization and automation, its primary focus on operational efficiency leaves emerging strategic priorities—human-centricity, sustainability, and resilience—outside its original scope. The Industry 5.0 agenda explicitly elevates these three pillars, creating new potential to drive lean transformation. However, how Industry 5.0 can systematically drive lean manufacturing transformation remains unclear. To address this knowledge gap, this study develops a strategic roadmap. First, a content-centric literature review identifies 12 key enablers for Industry 5.0-driven lean manufacturing. Second, Fuzzy Interpretive Structural Modeling (FISM) and expert opinions determine hierarchical relationships among the enablers and construct a multi-level structural model. Third, Matrices d’Impacts Croisés Multiplication Appliquée à un Classement (MICMAC) analysis evaluates the driving power and dependence of each enabler. Finally, a strategic roadmap is developed based on expert synthesis. The findings reveal that “government regulation and incentives” and “employee skill training” are the most critical enablers, while “value chain design and improvement” and “resource input and return” are the most complex and difficult to develop. The roadmap highlights the mediating role of “stakeholder participation and collaboration.” Importantly, the roadmap addresses potential tensions in lean implementation—such as the carbon footprint trade-off of frequent small-batch transport—by embedding sustainability assessment into value chain design and technology governance. This study offers a practical guide for manufacturers to prioritize investments and sequence actions toward lean transformation in the Industry 5.0 era. The main contribution of this study is a strategic roadmap that explains how Industry 5.0 can enable lean manufacturing transformation through prioritized actions and hierarchical enablers, while reconciling efficiency with sustainability and resilience goals. This roadmap offers a practical guide for manufacturers and policymakers to sequence investments and actions toward lean transformation in the Industry 5.0 era. Full article

This study presents a gate-to-gate life cycle assessment (LCA) of an industrial sweet cherry sorting and packing facility in Greece, directly addressing environmental sustainability in agri-food supply chains through data-driven impact quantification and improvement pathways in post-harvest operations. The assessment focuses on a gate-to-gate system boundary encompassing all processes inside the cherry sorting and packing facility, while upstream cherry production and downstream waste management are modeled and reported separately to provide system-level context. Core-stage hotspots are then analyzed in detail in the Results section, highlighting the dominant role of electricity use compared with packaging materials. The functional unit is defined as 1 kg of packed, market-ready cherries at the factory gate. Primary data are obtained from high-resolution, batch-level measurements of mass flows, energy use, water consumption, packaging materials and waste streams over a full processing season, structured as virtual sensor outputs. These sensor-informed operational data are combined with secondary life cycle inventory information from established databases to quantify climate change impacts and identify environmental hotspots across materials, energy, water, and waste, thereby delivering a quantified picture of environmental performance in the post-harvest stage. The results show that corrugated cardboard and associated packaging components are among the main contributors within the facility-level, gate-to-gate system, while the Core stage accounts for 28.43% of total GWP100. Upstream cherry production dominates the overall Upstream–Core–Downstream climate footprint with 70.61% of total impacts. Moreover, practical mitigation scenarios are modeled, including packaging optimization, partial substitution of grid electricity with photovoltaic generation, and increased water recirculation. Ιn the combined mitigation scenario, where packaging optimization, low-carbon electricity and improved water management are implemented simultaneously, total GWP100 decreases from 114,207.32 to 92,500.27 kg CO₂-eq (−19.0%) relative to the baseline, providing actionable sustainability improvements for industry stakeholders and supporting Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) related to climate action and resource efficiency. In addition, the proposed virtual sensor architecture and data workflow support continuous monitoring, eco-efficiency management and near-real-time LCA implementation in post-harvest agri-food systems, enabling operational sustainability. Full article

Environmental supply-chain governance increasingly requires firms to trace climate accountability across buyer–supplier relationships. This study examines whether downstream customer climate pressure is associated with suppliers’ green supply-chain management and value-chain carbon accountability among Chinese listed firms. We construct an exposure-weighted customer pressure measure by combining disclosed top-customer relationships with customer climate-accountability signals, and we decompose this measure into disclosure-based and non-disclosure-based components so that symbolic and substantive accountability can be separated. We then link this measure to supplier green supply-chain indicators, value-chain carbon-disclosure components, Scope 3 disclosure, environmental investment, and reported environmental performance indicators, including air emissions, water pollutant discharge, resource consumption, and environmental tax. Using firm-year panel regressions with fixed effects, alternative pressure measures, selection corrections, and extended outcome tests, we find an association between customer climate pressure and supplier value-chain disclosure. The depth of the association is concentrated where customer carbon-disclosure visibility is observed and is not separately identified in the smaller climate-only subsample, while the value-chain interaction association is positive but imprecisely estimated there. The value-chain disclosure associations are robust to a year-stratified randomization-inference placebo test. We do not find evidence that customer pressure is associated with supplier emissions, resource use, environmental investment, or environmental tax in the available matched samples. The pattern is consistent with symbolic compliance in supply-chain carbon accountability: customer disclosure visibility maps into supplier disclosure visibility, while we do not observe parallel movement in substantive environmental outcomes. The central finding is therefore that downstream customer climate pressure is associated with what suppliers disclose rather than with what they emit, shaping supplier disclosure behavior rather than substantive emission reduction. The estimates apply to supplier-year observations with disclosed and mappable listed-customer links, which we treat as the scope condition of the study rather than as an incidental data limitation. Full article