Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (16)

Search Parameters:
Authors = Stefania Ianniello

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
10 pages, 195 KiB  
Article
Safety and Effectiveness of BPaL-Based Regimens to Treat Multidrug-Resistant TB: First Experience of an Italian Tuberculosis Referral Hospital
by Gina Gualano, Maria Musso, Paola Mencarini, Silvia Mosti, Carlotta Cerva, Pietro Vittozzi, Antonio Mazzarelli, Angela Cannas, Assunta Navarra, Stefania Ianniello, Paolo Faccendini and Fabrizio Palmieri
Antibiotics 2025, 14(1), 7; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14010007 - 25 Dec 2024
Viewed by 2379
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Tuberculosis (TB) is preventable and curable, but multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) and extensively drug-resistant TB (XDR-TB) pose significant challenges worldwide due to the limited treatment options, lengths of therapies, and high rates of treatment failure. The management of MDR-TB has been revolutionized [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Tuberculosis (TB) is preventable and curable, but multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) and extensively drug-resistant TB (XDR-TB) pose significant challenges worldwide due to the limited treatment options, lengths of therapies, and high rates of treatment failure. The management of MDR-TB has been revolutionized by all oral anti-TB drug regimens that are likely to improve adherence and treatment outcomes. These regimes include bedaquiline (B), pretomanid (P), and linezolid (L) (BPaL), and moxifloxacin if resistance to fluoroquinolones is not detected (BPaLM). Based on the evidence generated by the TB-PRACTECAL and ZeNix randomized controlled trials, BPaL/BPaLM regimens are recommended over the currently recommended longer regimens in patients with MDR-TB or monoresistance to rifampin (RR). To our knowledge, no data are currently available on the implementation of BPaL/BPaLM regimens in Italy. Results: Seventeen patients completed the BPaL/BPaLM regimen, with a treatment success rate of 90% (17/19), consistent with the literature data. Eleven patients out of the nineteen retained in care (58%) complained about symptoms consistent with adverse events (AEs). No treatment interruption was necessary due to AEs. Methods: Here, we report the real-world experience of a tertiary referral hospital for TB in Italy, from 2022 to 2024, in the management, outcomes, and adverse drug reactions of a cohort of twenty-two MDR/RR patients treated with BPaL and BPaLM regimens. Conclusions: BPaL-containing regimens also serve as promising options for patients with RR/MDR-TB in terms of real-life experience, but further multicentric studies are required in Europe to confirm the efficacy of shorter regimens to eliminate MDR TB. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antibiotics Use for Respiratory Diseases)
10 pages, 356 KiB  
Article
Clinical Utility of Induced Sputum and Bronchoalveolar Lavage Cultures in Diagnosing Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Pulmonary Disease
by Maria Angela Licata, Paola Mencarini, Annelisa Mastrobattista, Serena Maria Carli, Carlotta Cerva, Silvia Mosti, Raffaella Libertone, Alberto Zolezzi, Pietro Vittozzi, Carla Nisii, Antonio Mazzarelli, Angela Cannas, Assunta Navarra, Stefania Ianniello, Rocco Trisolini, Delia Goletti, Fabrizio Palmieri and Gina Gualano
Pathogens 2024, 13(12), 1064; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13121064 - 3 Dec 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1621
Abstract
Diagnosing non-tuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease (NTM-PD) in patients unable to produce sputum spontaneously requires invasive procedures to obtain valid respiratory specimens. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the results of microbiological tests performed on respiratory samples of 132 patients affected by NTM-PD. In [...] Read more.
Diagnosing non-tuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease (NTM-PD) in patients unable to produce sputum spontaneously requires invasive procedures to obtain valid respiratory specimens. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the results of microbiological tests performed on respiratory samples of 132 patients affected by NTM-PD. In the diagnostic workout, 98 patients performed both induced sputum (IS) and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and were enrolled in our study. A total of 93 out of 98 BAL samples (95%) were culture-positive for mycobacteria, whereas only 67/153 (44%) induced sputum cultures were positive for NTM (p < 0.001). Molecular identification of NTM with real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was positive in 48/64 BAL (75%) and in 47/139 (34%) IS samples (p < 0.001). Patients affected by nodular-bronchiectatic form were 65/98 (66%): BAL culture was positive in 95% of cases (62/65 BAL), while only 30/99 IS cultures were positive (30%; p < 0.001). PCR was positive in 76% of BAL samples examined (26/34) and in 26% of the IS samples (24 out of 91) (p < 0.001). Among 33 patients with a fibro-cavitary radiological pattern, 65% of IS (35/54) were culture-positive for NTM, whereas 94% of cases (31/33) had a positive culture for NTM from BAL (p = 0.002). PCR was positive in 73% of BAL samples tested (22/30) and 48% of IS samples tested (23/48) (p = 0.031). Our results confirm BAL mycobacterial culture as the gold standard for the diagnosis of pulmonary mycobacteriosis. FBS with BAL should be performed in every patient with a strong suspicion of NTM-PD, if other respiratory samples are repeatedly negative. Sputum induction is a useful technique to obtain valid respiratory samples when patients are unable to produce spontaneous sputum, especially in the outpatient setting. However, during the diagnostic workup of NTM-PD, we should not forget that PCR and mycobacterial culture of induced sputum have a lower yield than when performed on BAL, especially in the nodular-bronchiectatic form of the disease. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Bacterial Pathogens)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 2131 KiB  
Review
Spondylodiscitis and Its Mimickers: A Pictorial Review
by Claudia Lucia Piccolo, Alberta Villanacci, Federica Di Stefano, Nicoletta Fusco, Davide Roberto Donno, Massimo Cristofaro, Fabrizio Taglietti and Stefania Ianniello
Biomedicines 2024, 12(11), 2566; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12112566 - 9 Nov 2024
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 5441
Abstract
Spondylodiscitis is an infection of the intervertebral disc, the adjacent vertebral body, and/or contiguous structures due to the introduction of infectious agent, usually by the hematogenous route. Imaging is crucial in assessing bacterial and tubercular spondylodiscitis, as well as their associated complications. Magnetic [...] Read more.
Spondylodiscitis is an infection of the intervertebral disc, the adjacent vertebral body, and/or contiguous structures due to the introduction of infectious agent, usually by the hematogenous route. Imaging is crucial in assessing bacterial and tubercular spondylodiscitis, as well as their associated complications. Magnetic resonance imaging in particular can clearly depict osteo-structural changes in the vertebral body and the associated disc, as well as any soft-tissue complications, such as paravertebral abscess and/or epidural abscess, improving disease characterization and helping to recognize the agent involved. Nevertheless, other non-infectious diseases may mimic imaging appearances of spondylodiscitis and one should be aware of these conditions when interpreting MR images, which include Modic type I degenerative changes, ankylosing spondylitis, acute Schmorl’s node, porotic fractures, and spinal neuropathy arthropathy. This pictorial review aims at describing imaging findings of bacterial and non-bacterial spondylodiscitis, complications, and those pathologies that mimic these infections. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Musculoskeletal Disease: From Infectious to Neoplastic)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1489 KiB  
Article
Predictors of Mortality and Orotracheal Intubation in Patients with Pulmonary Barotrauma Due to COVID-19: An Italian Multicenter Observational Study during Two Years of the Pandemic
by Nardi Tetaj, Gennaro De Pascale, Massimo Antonelli, Joel Vargas, Martina Savino, Francesco Pugliese, Francesco Alessandri, Giovanni Giordano, Pierfrancesco Tozzi, Monica Rocco, Anna Maria Biava, Luigi Maggi, Raffaella Pisapia, Francesco Maria Fusco, Giulia Valeria Stazi, Gabriele Garotto, Maria Cristina Marini, Pierluca Piselli, Alessia Beccacece, Andrea Mariano, Maria Letizia Giancola, Stefania Ianniello, Francesco Vaia, Enrico Girardi, Andrea Antinori, Maria Grazia Bocci, Luisa Marchioni and Emanuele Nicastriadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(6), 1707; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13061707 - 15 Mar 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1893
Abstract
Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a significant and novel cause of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). During the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been an increase in the incidence of cases involving pneumothorax and pneumomediastinum. However, the risk factors associated with poor outcomes [...] Read more.
Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a significant and novel cause of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). During the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been an increase in the incidence of cases involving pneumothorax and pneumomediastinum. However, the risk factors associated with poor outcomes in these patients remain unclear. Methods: This observational study collected clinical and imaging data from COVID-19 patients with PTX and/or PNM across five tertiary hospitals in central Italy between 1 March 2020 and 1 March 2022. This study also calculated the incidence of PTX and PNM and utilized multivariable regression analysis and Kaplan–Meier curve analysis to identify predictor factors for 28-day mortality and 3-day orotracheal intubation after PTX/PNM. This study also considered the impact of the three main variants of concern (VoCs) (alfa, delta, and omicron) circulating during the study period. Results: During the study period, a total of 11,938 patients with COVID-19 were admitted. This study found several factors independently associated with a higher risk of death in COVID-19 patients within 28 days of pulmonary barotrauma. These factors included a SOFA score ≥ 4 (OR 3.22, p = 0.013), vasopressor/inotropic therapy (OR 11.8, p < 0.001), hypercapnia (OR 2.72, p = 0.021), PaO2/FiO2 ratio < 150 mmHg (OR 10.9, p < 0.001), and cardiovascular diseases (OR 7.9, p < 0.001). This study also found that a SOFA score ≥ 4 (OR 3.10, p = 0.015), PCO2 > 45 mmHg (OR 6.0, p = 0.003), and P/F ratio < 150 mmHg (OR 2.9, p < 0.042) were factors independently associated with a higher risk of orotracheal intubation (OTI) within 3 days from PTX/PNM in patients with non-invasive mechanical ventilation. SARS-CoV-2 VoCs were not associated with 28-day mortality or the risk of OTI. The estimated cumulative probability of OTI in patients after pneumothorax was 44.0% on the first day, 67.8% on the second day, and 68.9% on the third day, according to univariable survival analysis. In patients who had pneumomediastinum only, the estimated cumulative probability of OTI was 37.5%, 46.7%, and 57.7% on the first, second, and third days, respectively. The overall incidence of PTX/PNM among hospitalized COVID-19 patients was 1.42%, which increased up to 4.1% in patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation. Conclusions: This study suggests that a high SOFA score (≥4), the need for vasopressor/inotropic therapy, hypercapnia, and PaO2/FiO2 ratio < 150 mmHg in COVID-19 patients with pulmonary barotrauma are associated with higher rates of intubation, ICU admission, and mortality. Identifying these risk factors early on can help healthcare providers anticipate and manage these patients more effectively and provide timely interventions with appropriate intensive care, ultimately improving their outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Critical Care during COVID-19 Pandemic)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 1483 KiB  
Article
New Topical Therapy for Provoked Vestibulodynia: Improvement of Psychological and Sexual Well-Being
by Francesco De Seta, Patrizia Ianniello, Stefania Carlucci, Luigi Nappi, Felice Sorrentino and Guglielmo Stabile
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(3), 1931; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20031931 - 20 Jan 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2791
Abstract
Vulvodynia is a vulvar discomfort that occurs in the absence of any specific, clinically identifiable disorder. Few therapies have shown to be effective for the treatment of vulvodynia. In our recently published study, we tested a drug-free gel in women affected by vulvar [...] Read more.
Vulvodynia is a vulvar discomfort that occurs in the absence of any specific, clinically identifiable disorder. Few therapies have shown to be effective for the treatment of vulvodynia. In our recently published study, we tested a drug-free gel in women affected by vulvar vestibulitis. It is a cosmetic gel which acts locally without any metabolic, pharmacological or immunological effect. In order to further promote the validity of this new product, in this manuscript we analyzed the results obtained from the administration of four questionnaires in the same two groups of women affected by PVD and treated with a placebo and the new product. The questionnaires used: Female Sexual Function Index Scoring (FSFI), Female Sexual Distress Scale (FSDS), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and health-related quality of life measured by SF-36 (SF-36). The results obtained by this current analysis showed that the new gel has also proven benefits on women’s quality of life and sexual function, including improvements in arousal, desire, orgasm and satisfaction. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1260 KiB  
Article
Timing and Outcomes of Noninvasive Ventilation in 307 ARDS COVID-19 Patients: An Observational Study in an Italian Third Level COVID-19 Hospital
by Nardi Tetaj, Pierluca Piselli, Sara Zito, Giada De Angelis, Maria Cristina Marini, Dorotea Rubino, Ilaria Gaviano, Maria Vittoria Antonica, Elisabetta Agostini, Candido Porcelli, Giulia Valeria Stazi, Gabriele Garotto, Donatella Busso, Silvana Scarcia, Assunta Navarra, Claudia Cimaglia, Simone Topino, Fabio Iacomi, Alessandra D’Abramo, Carmela Pinnetti, Gina Gualano, Alessandro Capone, Alberta Villanacci, Andrea Antinori, Fabrizio Palmieri, Gianpiero D’Offizi, Stefania Ianniello, Fabrizio Taglietti, Paolo Campioni, Francesco Vaia, Emanuele Nicastri, Enrico Girardi, Luisa Marchioni and on behalf of the ReCOVeRI Study Groupadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Medicina 2022, 58(8), 1104; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58081104 - 15 Aug 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2331
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a novel cause of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is widely used in patients with ARDS across several etiologies. Indeed, with the increase of ARDS cases due to the COVID-19 [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a novel cause of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is widely used in patients with ARDS across several etiologies. Indeed, with the increase of ARDS cases due to the COVID-19 pandemic, its use has grown significantly in hospital wards. However, there is a lack of evidence to support the efficacy of NIV in patients with COVID-19 ARDS. Materials and Methods: We conducted an observational cohort study including adult ARDS COVID-19 patients admitted in a third level COVID-center in Rome, Italy. The study analyzed the rate of NIV failure defined by the occurrence of orotracheal intubation and/or death within 28 days from starting NIV, its effectiveness, and the associated relative risk of death. The factors associated with the outcomes were identified through logistic regression analysis. Results: During the study period, a total of 942 COVID-19 patients were admitted to our hospital, of which 307 (32.5%) presented with ARDS at hospitalization. During hospitalization 224 (23.8%) were treated with NIV. NIV failure occurred in 84 (37.5%) patients. At 28 days from starting NIV, moderate and severe ARDS had five-fold and twenty-fold independent increased risk of NIV failure (adjusted odds ratio, aOR = 5.01, 95% CI 2.08–12.09, and 19.95, 95% CI 5.31–74.94), respectively, compared to patients with mild ARDS. A total of 128 patients (13.5%) were admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). At 28-day from ICU admission, intubated COVID-19 patients treated with early NIV had 40% lower mortality (aOR 0.60, 95% CI 0.25–1.46, p = 0.010) compared with patients that underwent orotracheal intubation without prior NIV. Conclusions: These findings show that NIV failure was independently correlated with the severity category of COVID-19 ARDS. The start of NIV in COVID-19 patients with mild ARDS (P/F > 200 mmHg) appears to increase NIV effectiveness and reduce the risk of orotracheal intubation and/or death. Moreover, early NIV (P/F > 200 mmHg) treatment seems to reduce the risk of ICU mortality at 28 days from ICU admission. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Intensive Care/ Anesthesiology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 12168 KiB  
Article
Imaging Severity COVID-19 Assessment in Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Patients: Comparison of the Different Variants in a High Volume Italian Reference Center
by Vincenza Granata, Roberta Fusco, Alberta Villanacci, Simona Magliocchetti, Fabrizio Urraro, Nardi Tetaj, Luisa Marchioni, Fabrizio Albarello, Paolo Campioni, Massimo Cristofaro, Federica Di Stefano, Nicoletta Fusco, Ada Petrone, Vincenzo Schininà, Francesca Grassi, Enrico Girardi and Stefania Ianniello
J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12(6), 955; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12060955 - 10 Jun 2022
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 3215
Abstract
Purpose: To analyze the vaccine effect by comparing five groups: unvaccinated patients with Alpha variant, unvaccinated patients with Delta variant, vaccinated patients with Delta variant, unvaccinated patients with Omicron variant, and vaccinated patients with Omicron variant, assessing the “gravity” of COVID-19 pulmonary involvement, [...] Read more.
Purpose: To analyze the vaccine effect by comparing five groups: unvaccinated patients with Alpha variant, unvaccinated patients with Delta variant, vaccinated patients with Delta variant, unvaccinated patients with Omicron variant, and vaccinated patients with Omicron variant, assessing the “gravity” of COVID-19 pulmonary involvement, based on CT findings in critically ill patients admitted to Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Methods: Patients were selected by ICU database considering the period from December 2021 to 23 March 2022, according to the following inclusion criteria: patients with proven Omicron variant COVID-19 infection with known COVID-19 vaccination with at least two doses and with chest Computed Tomography (CT) study during ICU hospitalization. Wee also evaluated the ICU database considering the period from March 2020 to December 2021, to select unvaccinated consecutive patients with Alpha variant, subjected to CT study, consecutive unvaccinated and vaccinated patients with Delta variant, subjected to CT study, and, consecutive unvaccinated patients with Omicron variant, subjected to CT study. CT images were evaluated qualitatively using a severity score scale of 5 levels (none involvement, mild: ≤25% of involvement, moderate: 26–50% of involvement, severe: 51–75% of involvement, and critical involvement: 76–100%) and quantitatively, using the Philips IntelliSpace Portal clinical application CT COPD computer tool. For each patient the lung volumetry was performed identifying the percentage value of aerated residual lung volume. Non-parametric tests for continuous and categorical variables were performed to assess statistically significant differences among groups. Results: The patient study group was composed of 13 vaccinated patients affected by the Omicron variant (Omicron V). As control groups we identified: 20 unvaccinated patients with Alpha variant (Alpha NV); 20 unvaccinated patients with Delta variant (Delta NV); 18 vaccinated patients with Delta variant (Delta V); and 20 unvaccinated patients affected by the Omicron variant (Omicron NV). No differences between the groups under examination were found (p value > 0.05 at Chi square test) in terms of risk factors (age, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, immunosuppression, chronic kidney, cardiac, pulmonary, neurologic, and liver disease, etc.). A different median value of aerated residual lung volume was observed in the Delta variant groups: median value of aerated residual lung volume was 46.70% in unvaccinated patients compared to 67.10% in vaccinated patients. In addition, in patients with Delta variant every other extracted volume by automatic tool showed a statistically significant difference between vaccinated and unvaccinated group. Statistically significant differences were observed for each extracted volume by automatic tool between unvaccinated patients affected by Alpha variant and vaccinated patients affected by Delta variant of COVID-19. Good statistically significant correlations among volumes extracted by automatic tool for each lung lobe and overall radiological severity score were obtained (ICC range 0.71–0.86). GGO was the main sign of COVID-19 lesions on CT images found in 87 of the 91 (95.6%) patients. No statistically significant differences were observed in CT findings (ground glass opacities (GGO), consolidation or crazy paving sign) among patient groups. Conclusion: In our study, we showed that in critically ill patients no difference were observed in terms of severity of disease or exitus, between unvaccinated and vaccinated patients. The only statistically significant differences were observed, with regard to the severity of COVID-19 pulmonary parenchymal involvement, between unvaccinated patients affected by Alpha variant and vaccinated patients affected by Delta variant, and between unvaccinated patients with Delta variant and vaccinated patients with Delta variant. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cancer Challenges during COVID-19 Pandemic)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 544 KiB  
Article
Epidemiology, Clinical Presentation and Treatment of Non-Hepatic Hyperammonemia in ICU COVID-19 Patients
by Nardi Tetaj, Giulia Valeria Stazi, Maria Cristina Marini, Gabriele Garotto, Donatella Busso, Silvana Scarcia, Ilaria Caravella, Manuela Macchione, Giada De Angelis, Rachele Di Lorenzo, Alessandro Carucci, Alessandro Capone, Andrea Antinori, Fabrizio Palmieri, Gianpiero D’Offizi, Fabrizio Taglietti, Stefania Ianniello, Paolo Campioni, Francesco Vaia, Emanuele Nicastri, Enrico Girardi, Luisa Marchioni and on behalf of ICU COVID-19 Study Groupadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(9), 2592; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11092592 - 5 May 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 3184
Abstract
(1) Background: Although COVID-19 is largely a respiratory disease, it is actually a systemic disease that has a wide range of effects that are not yet fully known. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence, predictors and outcome of non-hepatic [...] Read more.
(1) Background: Although COVID-19 is largely a respiratory disease, it is actually a systemic disease that has a wide range of effects that are not yet fully known. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence, predictors and outcome of non-hepatic hyperammonemia (NHH) in COVID-19 in intensive care unit (ICU); (2) Methods: This is a 3-month prospective observational study in a third-level COVID-19 hospital. The authors collected demographic, clinical, severity score and outcome data. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of NHH; (3) Results: 156 COVID-19 patients were admitted to the ICU. The incidence of NHH was 12.2% (19 patients). The univariate analysis showed that invasive mechanical ventilation had a 6.6-fold higher risk (OR 6.66, 95% CI 0.86–51.6, p = 0.039) for NHH, while in the multiple regression analysis, there was a 7-fold higher risk for NHH—but it was not statistically significant (OR 7.1, 95% CI 0.90–56.4, p = 0.062). Demographics, clinical characteristics and mortality in the ICU at 28 days did not show a significant association with NHH. (4) Conclusions: The incidence of NHH in ICU COVID-19 patients was not low. NHH did not appear to significantly increase mortality, and all patients with non-hepatic hyperammonemia were successfully treated without further complications. However, the pathogenesis of NHH in ICU patients with COVID-19 remains a topic to be explored with further research. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 4515 KiB  
Article
Pulmonary Lymphangitis Poses a Major Challenge for Radiologists in an Oncological Setting during the COVID-19 Pandemic
by Roberta Fusco, Igino Simonetti, Stefania Ianniello, Alberta Villanacci, Francesca Grassi, Federica Dell’Aversana, Roberta Grassi, Diletta Cozzi, Eleonora Bicci, Pierpaolo Palumbo, Alessandra Borgheresi, Andrea Giovagnoni, Vittorio Miele, Antonio Barile and Vincenza Granata
J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12(4), 624; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12040624 - 12 Apr 2022
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 4001
Abstract
Due to the increasing number of COVID-19-infected and vaccinated individuals, radiologists continue to see patients with COVID-19 pneumonitis and recall pneumonitis, which could result in additional workups and false-positive results. Moreover, cancer patients undergoing immunotherapy may show therapy-related pneumonitis during imaging management. This [...] Read more.
Due to the increasing number of COVID-19-infected and vaccinated individuals, radiologists continue to see patients with COVID-19 pneumonitis and recall pneumonitis, which could result in additional workups and false-positive results. Moreover, cancer patients undergoing immunotherapy may show therapy-related pneumonitis during imaging management. This is otherwise known as immune checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis. Following on from this background, radiologists should seek to know their patients’ COVID-19 infection and vaccination history. Knowing the imaging features related to COVID-19 infection and vaccination is critical to avoiding misleading results and alarmism in patients and clinicians. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cancer Challenges during COVID-19 Pandemic)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 264 KiB  
Article
Increased Association of Pulmonary Thromboembolism and Tuberculosis during COVID-19 Pandemic: Data from an Italian Infectious Disease Referral Hospital
by Virginia Di Bari, Gina Gualano, Maria Musso, Raffaella Libertone, Carla Nisii, Stefania Ianniello, Silvia Mosti, Annelisa Mastrobattista, Carlotta Cerva, Nazario Bevilacqua, Fabio Iacomi, Annalisa Mondi, Simone Topino, Delia Goletti, Enrico Girardi, Fabrizio Palmieri and on behalf of the TB-INMI Working Group
Antibiotics 2022, 11(3), 398; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11030398 - 16 Mar 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3391
Abstract
Pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) has been associated with tuberculosis (TB), but the true incidence is unknown. The aim of our study was to retrospectively evaluate the PTE prevalence in TB patients hospitalized at the National Institute for Infectious Diseases L. Spallanzani during the January [...] Read more.
Pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) has been associated with tuberculosis (TB), but the true incidence is unknown. The aim of our study was to retrospectively evaluate the PTE prevalence in TB patients hospitalized at the National Institute for Infectious Diseases L. Spallanzani during the January 2016–December 2021 period. Retrospective data collection and evaluation were conducted. Among 1801 TB patients, 29 (1.61%) exhibited PTE. Twenty (69%) had comorbidities; eleven (37.9%) had predisposing factors for PTE. Nineteen (65.5%) had extensive TB disease. The commonest respiratory symptoms were cough (37.9%), dyspnea (31%), chest pain (10.3%), and hemoptysis (6.9%). Twenty-five (86.2%) had elevated serum D-dimer levels. An increased prevalence of PTE from 0.6% in the pre-COVID-19 pandemic period to 4.6% in the pandemic period was found. Acute respiratory failure and extensive TB disease increased significantly in the pandemic period. The increase in PTE could be explained by the increased severity of TB in patients in the pandemic period and by increased clinical suspicion and, consequently, increased requests for D-dimer testing, including in patients with non-COVID-19 pneumonia. Patients with extensive pulmonary disease are at high risk of developing PTE. Clinicians should be aware of this potentially life-threatening complication of TB, and patients should receive a thromboembolism risk assessment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antibiotics and Infectious Respiratory Diseases)
11 pages, 2537 KiB  
Article
Incidence of Pneumothorax and Pneumomediastinum in 497 COVID-19 Patients with Moderate–Severe ARDS over a Year of the Pandemic: An Observational Study in an Italian Third Level COVID-19 Hospital
by Nardi Tetaj, Gabriele Garotto, Fabrizio Albarello, Annelisa Mastrobattista, Micaela Maritti, Giulia Valeria Stazi, Maria Cristina Marini, Ilaria Caravella, Manuela Macchione, Giada De Angelis, Donatella Busso, Rachele Di Lorenzo, Silvana Scarcia, Anna Farina, Daniele Centanni, Joel Vargas, Martina Savino, Alessandro Carucci, Andrea Antinori, Fabrizio Palmieri, Gianpiero D’Offizi, Stefania Ianniello, Fabrizio Taglietti, Paolo Campioni, Francesco Vaia, Emanuele Nicastri, Enrico Girardi, Luisa Marchioni and ICU COVID-19 Study Groupadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(23), 5608; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10235608 - 29 Nov 2021
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 3301
Abstract
(1) Background: COVID-19 is a novel cause of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Indeed, with the increase of ARDS cases due to the COVID-19 pandemic, there has also been an increase in the incidence of cases with pneumothorax (PNX) and pneumomediastinum (PNM). However, [...] Read more.
(1) Background: COVID-19 is a novel cause of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Indeed, with the increase of ARDS cases due to the COVID-19 pandemic, there has also been an increase in the incidence of cases with pneumothorax (PNX) and pneumomediastinum (PNM). However, the incidence and the predictors of PNX/PMN in these patients are currently unclear and even conflicting. (2) Methods: The present observational study analyzed the incidence of barotrauma (PNX/PNM) in COVID-19 patients with moderate–severe ARDS hospitalized in a year of the pandemic, also focusing on the three waves occurring during the year, and treated with positive-pressure ventilation (PPV). We collected demographic and clinical data. (3) Results: During this period, 40 patients developed PNX/PNM. The overall incidence of barotrauma in all COVID-19 patients hospitalized in a year was 1.6%, and in those with moderate–severe ARDS in PPV was 7.2% and 3.8 events per 1000 positive-pressure ventilator days. The incidence of barotrauma in moderate–severe ARDS COVID-19 patients during the three waves was 7.8%, 7.4%, and 8.7%, respectively. Treatment with noninvasive respiratory support alone was associated with an incidence of barotrauma of 9.1% and 2.6 events per 1000 noninvasive ventilator days, of which 95% were admitted to the ICU after the event, due to a worsening of respiratory parameters. The incidence of barotrauma of ICU COVID-19 patients in invasive ventilation over a year was 5.8% and 2.7 events per 1000 invasive ventilator days. There was no significant difference in demographics and clinical features between the barotrauma and non-barotrauma group. The mortality was higher in the barotrauma group (17 patients died, 47.2%) than in the non-barotrauma group (170 patients died, 37%), although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.429). (4) Conclusions: The incidence of PNX/PNM in moderate–severe ARDS COVID-19 patients did not differ significantly between the three waves over a year, and does not appear to be very different from that in ARDS patients in the pre-COVID era. The barotrauma does not appear to significantly increase mortality in COVID-19 patients with moderate–severe ARDS if protective ventilation strategies are applied. Attention should be paid to the risk of barotrauma in COVID-19 patients in noninvasive ventilation because the event increases the probability of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) and intubation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Infectious Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1560 KiB  
Article
Quantitative Analysis of Residual COVID-19 Lung CT Features: Consistency among Two Commercial Software
by Vincenza Granata, Stefania Ianniello, Roberta Fusco, Fabrizio Urraro, Davide Pupo, Simona Magliocchetti, Fabrizio Albarello, Paolo Campioni, Massimo Cristofaro, Federica Di Stefano, Nicoletta Fusco, Ada Petrone, Vincenzo Schininà, Alberta Villanacci, Francesca Grassi, Roberta Grassi and Roberto Grassi
J. Pers. Med. 2021, 11(11), 1103; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11111103 - 28 Oct 2021
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 3082
Abstract
Objective: To investigate two commercial software and their efficacy in the assessment of chest CT sequelae in patients affected by COVID-19 pneumonia, comparing the consistency of tools. Materials and Methods: Included in the study group were 120 COVID-19 patients (56 women and 104 [...] Read more.
Objective: To investigate two commercial software and their efficacy in the assessment of chest CT sequelae in patients affected by COVID-19 pneumonia, comparing the consistency of tools. Materials and Methods: Included in the study group were 120 COVID-19 patients (56 women and 104 men; 61 years of median age; range: 21–93 years) who underwent chest CT examinations at discharge between 5 March 2020 and 15 March 2021 and again at a follow-up time (3 months; range 30–237 days). A qualitative assessment by expert radiologists in the infectious disease field (experience of at least 5 years) was performed, and a quantitative evaluation using thoracic VCAR software (GE Healthcare, Chicago, Illinois, United States) and a pneumonia module of ANKE ASG-340 CT workstation (HTS Med & Anke, Naples, Italy) was performed. The qualitative evaluation included the presence of ground glass opacities (GGOs) consolidation, interlobular septal thickening, fibrotic-like changes (reticular pattern and/or honeycombing), bronchiectasis, air bronchogram, bronchial wall thickening, pulmonary nodules surrounded by GGOs, pleural and pericardial effusion, lymphadenopathy, and emphysema. A quantitative evaluation included the measurements of GGOs, consolidations, emphysema, residual healthy parenchyma, and total lung volumes for the right and left lung. A chi-square test and non-parametric test were utilized to verify the differences between groups. Correlation coefficients were used to analyze the correlation and variability among quantitative measurements by different computer tools. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed. Results: The correlation coefficients showed great variability among the quantitative measurements by different tools when calculated on baseline CT scans and considering all patients. Instead, a good correlation (≥0.6) was obtained for the quantitative GGO, as well as the consolidation volumes obtained by two tools when calculated on baseline CT scans, considering the control group. An excellent correlation (≥0.75) was obtained for the quantitative residual healthy lung parenchyma volume, GGO, consolidation volumes obtained by two tools when calculated on follow-up CT scans, and for residual healthy lung parenchyma and GGO quantification when the percentage change of these volumes were calculated between a baseline and follow-up scan. The highest value of accuracy to identify patients with RT-PCR positive compared to the control group was obtained by a GGO total volume quantification by thoracic VCAR (accuracy = 0.75). Conclusions: Computer aided quantification could be an easy and feasible way to assess chest CT sequelae due to COVID-19 pneumonia; however, a great variability among measurements provided by different tools should be considered. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cancer Challenges during COVID-19 Pandemic)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1354 KiB  
Article
Management of Spontaneous Bleeding in COVID-19 Inpatients: Is Embolization Always Needed?
by Pascale Riu, Fabrizio Albarello, Federica Di Stefano, Alessandra Vergori, Alessandra D’Abramo, Carlo Cerini, Martina Nocioni, Maurizio Morucci, Nardi Tetaj, Massimo Cristofaro, Vincenzo Schininà, Paolo Campioni, Ada Petrone, Nicoletta Fusco, Luisa Marchioni, Andrea Antinori, Emanuele Nicastri, Roberto Cianni and Stefania Ianniello
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(18), 4119; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10184119 - 12 Sep 2021
Cited by 17 | Viewed by 3653
Abstract
Background: critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection present a hypercoagulable condition. Anticoagulant therapy is currently recommended to reduce thrombotic risk, leading to potentially severe complications like spontaneous bleeding (SB). Percutaneous transcatheter arterial embolization (PTAE) can be life-saving in critical patients, in addition to [...] Read more.
Background: critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection present a hypercoagulable condition. Anticoagulant therapy is currently recommended to reduce thrombotic risk, leading to potentially severe complications like spontaneous bleeding (SB). Percutaneous transcatheter arterial embolization (PTAE) can be life-saving in critical patients, in addition to medical therapy. We report a major COVID-19 Italian Research Hospital experience during the pandemic, with particular focus on indications and technique of embolization. Methods: We retrospectively included all subjects with SB and with a microbiologically confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, over one year of pandemic, selecting two different groups: (a) patients treated with PTAE and medical therapy; (b) patients treated only with medical therapy. Computed tomography (CT) scan findings, clinical conditions, and biological findings were collected. Results: 21/1075 patients presented soft tissue SB with an incidence of 1.95%. 10/21 patients were treated with PTAE and medical therapy with a 30-days survival of 70%. Arterial blush, contrast late enhancement, and dimensions at CT scan were found discriminating for the embolization (p < 0.05). Conclusions: PTAE is an important tool in severely ill, bleeding COVID-19 patients. The decision for PTAE of COVID-19 patients must be carefully weighted with particular attention paid to the clinical and biological condition, hematoma location and volume. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Trends and Therapies of the COVID-19 Pandemic)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 3326 KiB  
Article
Outcomes and Timing of Bedside Percutaneous Tracheostomy of COVID-19 Patients over a Year in the Intensive Care Unit
by Nardi Tetaj, Micaela Maritti, Giulia Stazi, Maria Cristina Marini, Daniele Centanni, Gabriele Garotto, Ilaria Caravella, Cristina Dantimi, Matteo Fusetti, Carmen Santagata, Manuela Macchione, Giada De Angelis, Filippo Giansante, Donatella Busso, Rachele Di Lorenzo, Silvana Scarcia, Alessandro Carucci, Ricardo Cabas, Ilaria Gaviano, Nicola Petrosillo, Andrea Antinori, Fabrizio Palmieri, Gianpiero D’Offizi, Stefania Ianniello, Paolo Campioni, Francesco Pugliese, Francesco Vaia, Emanuele Nicastri, Giuseppe Ippolito, Luisa Marchioni and ICU COVID-19 Study Groupadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(15), 3335; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10153335 - 28 Jul 2021
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 3790
Abstract
Background: The benefits and timing of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) COVID-19 patients are still controversial. PDT is considered a high-risk procedure for the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 to healthcare workers (HCWs). The present study analyzed the optimal timing of [...] Read more.
Background: The benefits and timing of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) COVID-19 patients are still controversial. PDT is considered a high-risk procedure for the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 to healthcare workers (HCWs). The present study analyzed the optimal timing of PDT, the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing PDT, and the safety of HCWs performing PDT. Methods: Of the 133 COVID-19 patients who underwent PDT in our ICU from 1 April 2020 to 31 March 2021, 13 patients were excluded, and 120 patients were enrolled. A trained medical team was dedicated to the PDT procedure. Demographic, clinical history, and outcome data were collected. Patients who underwent PDT were stratified into two groups: an early group (PDT ≤ 12 days after orotracheal intubation (OTI) and a late group (>12 days after OTI). An HCW surveillance program was also performed. Results: The early group included 61 patients and the late group included 59 patients. The early group patients had a shorter ICU length of stay and fewer days of mechanical ventilation than the late group (p < 0.001). On day 7 after tracheostomy, early group patients required fewer intravenous anesthetic drugs and experienced an improvement of the ventilation parameters PaO2/FiO2 ratio, PEEP, and FiO2 (p < 0.001). No difference in the case fatality ratio between the two groups was observed. No SARS-CoV-2 infections were reported in the HCWs performing the PDTs. Conclusions: PDT was safe and effective for COVID-19 patients since it improved respiratory support parameters, reduced ICU length of stay and duration of mechanical ventilation, and optimized the weaning process. The procedure was safe for all HCWs involved in the dedicated medical team. The development of standardized early PDT protocols should be implemented, and PDT could be considered a first-line approach in ICU COVID-19 patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Infectious Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 4065 KiB  
Article
Increased Radiation Dose Exposure in Thoracic Computed Tomography in Patients with Covid-19
by Massimo Cristofaro, Nicoletta Fusco, Ada Petrone, Fabrizio Albarello, Federica Di Stefano, Elisa Pianura, Vincenzo Schininà, Stefania Ianniello and Paolo Campioni
Radiation 2021, 1(2), 153-161; https://doi.org/10.3390/radiation1020014 - 8 Jun 2021
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 5267
Abstract
The CT manifestation of COVID-19 patients is now well known and essentially reflects pathological changes in the lungs. Actually, there is insufficient knowledge on the long-term outcomes of this new disease, and several chest CTs might be necessary to evaluate the outcomes. The [...] Read more.
The CT manifestation of COVID-19 patients is now well known and essentially reflects pathological changes in the lungs. Actually, there is insufficient knowledge on the long-term outcomes of this new disease, and several chest CTs might be necessary to evaluate the outcomes. The aim of this study is to evaluate the radiation dose for chest CT scans in COVID-19 patients compared to a cohort with pulmonary infectious diseases at the same time of the previous year to value if there is any modification of exposure dose. The analysis of our data shows an increase in the overall mean dose in COVID-19 patients compared with non-COVID-19 patients. In our results, the higher dose increase occurs in the younger age groups (+86% range 21–30 years and +67% range 31–40 years). Our results show that COVID-19 patients are exposed to a significantly higher dose of ionizing radiation than other patients without COVID infectious lung disease, and especially in younger age groups, although some authors have proposed the use of radiotherapy in these patients, which is yet to be validated. Our study has limitations: the use of one CT machine in a single institute and a limited number of patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Radiation in Medical Imaging)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop