Skip Content
You are currently on the new version of our website. Access the old version .
MDPIMDPI
Search all articles
NutrientsNutrients
Download PDF
  • Comment
  • Open Access

23 May 2022

Comment on Muzzioli et al. Are Front-of-Pack Labels a Health Policy Tool? Nutrients 2022, 14, 771

,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
…
1
Joint Research Unit in Nutrition and Food, RDC-Nutrition AFRA/IAEA, Ibn Tofail University-CNESTEN, Rabat, Kenitra 14000, Morocco
2
Departament de Bioquimica i Biotecnologia, Unitat de Nutrició Humana. (IISPV), Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43201 Reus, Spain
3
Consorcio CIBER, M.P. Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBERObn), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), 28014 Madrid, Spain
4
Sorbonne Paris Nord University, Inserm U1153, Inrae U1125, Cnam, Nutritional Epidemiology Research Team (EREN), Epidemiology and Statistics Research Center—University of Paris (CRESS), 93017 Bobigny, France
Nutrients2022, 14(10), 2165;https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14102165
This article belongs to the Section Nutritional Policies and Education for Health Promotion
Version Notes
Order Reprints
As scientists working and publishing in the field of front-of-pack nutrition labelling (FOPNL) for many years, we have read with interest and concern the narrative review regarding their effectiveness by Muzzioli et al. [1].
First, the authors appear to consider that the premises underlying FOPNL—to inform consumers on the nutritional composition of foods from a health perspective and orient them towards healthier purchases—are not the object of consensus in the scientific community, despite them being clearly stated by the WHO [2]. In addition, they appear to place purely informative labels (such as the NutrInform Battery) and interpretive labels (Nutri-Score, Warning labels, Multiple Traffic Light) at the same level, while there is a clear scientific consensus that interpretive front-of-pack labels are more effective and equitable, and should be promoted (WHO principle n°7) [2]. Finally, FOPNL have been shown to act as drivers for reformulation, improving the overall nutritional environment [3].
Second, while FOPNL research usually relies on a clear theoretical framework [4], and grades the evidence provided by each type of study, the review conflates results from experimental studies, consumer surveys, cohort studies, and even studies not conducted with consumers at all to present a perspective that lacks a clear objective.
Finally, multiple studies investigating the performance of labels, including a very important network meta-analysis [5] and studies conducted in multiple countries comparing the effects of various types of labels, were entirely omitted from the review [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. These studies provide outstanding information as to the comparative effects of FOPNLs to help consumers identify healthier foods and make healthier purchases, and contribute to reduce the burden of nutrition-related disease [23,24]. Of great concern is that when studies on performance are referenced, they are misrepresented, instead reporting the results of preference elements within those same studies. For example, the study by Hagmann et al., which found a clear higher performance of Nutri-Score over all other labels, is relayed as finding that ‘most of the participants […] considered the Nutri-Score the least useful’ [25], which clearly misrepresents the results of the study.
These elements lead to an overall biased and misleading view of the literature, diminishing the value of multiple studies consistently showing that interpretive labels (Nutri-Score and Warning labels, in particular) lead to healthier food choices, as well as overstating the merits of non-interpretive labels, which have consistently been shown to be unable to produce significant modifications in dietary choices.
That FOPNL are only one of the many policies necessary to tackle the obesity epidemic has never been in doubt. However, it is also clear that FOPNLs are a useful health policy tool and, more importantly, interpretive labels such as the Nutri-Score constitute an evidence-based health policy tool [26], as reflected in the multiple studies that were apparently overlooked or misrepresented in this study.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, C.J.; writing—review and editing, by all authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors report no conflict of interest relating to this article.

References

  1. Muzzioli, L.; Penzavecchia, C.; Donini, L.M.; Pinto, A. Are Front-of-Pack Labels a Health Policy Tool? Nutrients 2022, 14, 771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. World Health Organization. Guiding Principles and Framework Manual for Front-of-Pack Labelling for Promoting Healthy Diet; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bablani, L.; Mhurchu, C.N.; Neal, B.; Skeels, C.L.; Staub, K.E.; Blakely, T. The Impact of Voluntary Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labelling on Packaged Food Reformulation: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis of the Australasian Health Star Rating Scheme. PLoS Med. 2020, 17, e1003427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Grunert, K.G.; Wills, J.M. A Review of European Research on Consumer Response to Nutrition Information on Food Labels. J. Public Health 2007, 15, 385–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Song, J.; Brown, M.K.; Tan, M.; MacGregor, G.A.; Webster, J.; Campbell, N.R.C.; Trieu, K.; Ni Mhurchu, C.; Cobb, L.K.; He, F.J. Impact of Color-Coded and Warning Nutrition Labelling Schemes: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. PLoS Med. 2021, 18, e1003765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Talati, Z.; Egnell, M.; Hercberg, S.; Julia, C.; Pettigrew, S. Food Choice Under Five Front-of-Package Nutrition Label Conditions: An Experimental Study Across 12 Countries. Am. J. Public Health 2019, 109, 1770–1775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Talati, Z.; Egnell, M.; Hercberg, S.; Julia, C.; Pettigrew, S. Consumers’ Perceptions of Five Front-of-Package Nutrition Labels: An Experimental Study Across 12 Countries. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Egnell, M.; Talati, Z.; Hercberg, S.; Pettigrew, S.; Julia, C. Objective Understanding of Front-of-Package Nutrition Labels: An International Comparative Experimental Study across 12 Countries. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Egnell, M.; Kesse-Guyot, E.; Galan, P.; Touvier, M.; Rayner, M.; Jewell, J.; Breda, J.; Hercberg, S.; Julia, C. Impact of Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labels on Portion Size Selection: An Experimental Study in a French Cohort. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Egnell, M.; Talati, Z.; Galan, P.; Andreeva, V.; Vandevijvere, S.; Gombaud, M.; Dréano-Trécant, L.; Hercberg, S.; Pettigrew, S.; Julia, C. Objective Understanding of the Nutri-Score Front-of-Pack Label by European Consumers and Its Effect on Food Choices: An Online Experimental Study. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2020, 17, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Acton, R.B.; Jones, A.C.; Kirkpatrick, S.I.; Roberto, C.A.; Hammond, D. Taxes and Front-of-Package Labels Improve the Healthiness of Beverage and Snack Purchases: A Randomized Experimental Marketplace. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2019, 16, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Crosetto, P.; Lacroix, A.; Muller, L.; Ruffieux, B. Nutritional and Economic Impact of Five Alternative Front-of-Pack Nutritional Labels: Experimental Evidence. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 2020, 47, 785–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dubois, P.; Albuquerque, P.; Allais, O.; Bonnet, C.; Bertail, P.; Combris, P.; Lahlou, S.; Rigal, N.; Ruffieux, B.; Chandon, P. Effects of Front-of-Pack Labels on the Nutritional Quality of Supermarket Food Purchases: Evidence from a Large-Scale Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2021, 49, 119–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Julia, C.; Méjean, C.; Péneau, S.; Buscail, C.; Alles, B.; Fézeu, L.; Touvier, M.; Hercberg, S.; Kesse-Guyot, E. The 5-CNL Front-of-Pack Nutrition Label Appears an Effective Tool to Achieve Food Substitutions towards Healthier Diets across Dietary Profiles. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0157545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Van den Akker, K.; Bartelet, D.; Brouwer, L.; Luijpers, S.; Nap, T.; Havermans, R. The Impact of the Nutri-Score on Food Choice: A Choice Experiment in a Dutch Supermarket. Appetite 2022, 168, 105664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Aguenaou, H.; El Ammari, L.; Bigdeli, M.; El Hajjab, A.; Lahmam, H.; Labzizi, S.; Gamih, H.; Talouizte, A.; Serbouti, C.; El Kari, K.; et al. Comparison of Appropriateness of Nutri-Score and Other Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labels across a Group of Moroccan Consumers: Awareness, Understanding and Food Choices. Arch. Public Health Arch. Belg. Sante Publique 2021, 79, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. De Temmerman, J.; Heeremans, E.; Slabbinck, H.; Vermeir, I. The Impact of the Nutri-Score Nutrition Label on Perceived Healthiness and Purchase Intentions. Appetite 2021, 157, 104995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Julia, C.; Arnault, N.; Agaësse, C.; Fialon, M.; Deschasaux-Tanguy, M.; Andreeva, V.A.; Fezeu, L.K.; Kesse-Guyot, E.; Touvier, M.; Galan, P.; et al. Impact of the Front-of-Pack Label Nutri-Score on the Nutritional Quality of Food Choices in a Quasi-Experimental Trial in Catering. Nutrients 2021, 13, 4530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Croker, H.; Packer, J.; Russell, S.J.; Stansfield, C.; Viner, R.M. Front of Pack Nutritional Labelling Schemes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Recent Evidence Relating to Objectively Measured Consumption and Purchasing. J. Hum. Nutr. Diet. Off. J. Br. Diet. Assoc. 2020, 33, 518–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Packer, J.; Russell, S.J.; Ridout, D.; Hope, S.; Conolly, A.; Jessop, C.; Robinson, O.J.; Stoffel, S.T.; Viner, R.M.; Croker, H. Assessing the Effectiveness of Front of Pack Labels: Findings from an Online Randomised-Controlled Experiment in a Representative British Sample. Nutrients 2021, 13, 900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ni Mhurchu, C.; Volkova, E.; Jiang, Y.; Eyles, H.; Michie, J.; Neal, B.; Blakely, T.; Swinburn, B.; Rayner, M. Effects of Interpretive Nutrition Labels on Consumer Food Purchases: The Starlight Randomized Controlled Trial. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2017, 105, 695–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Neal, B.; Crino, M.; Dunford, E.; Gao, A.; Greenland, R.; Li, N.; Ngai, J.; Ni Mhurchu, C.; Pettigrew, S.; Sacks, G.; et al. Effects of Different Types of Front-of-Pack Labelling Information on the Healthiness of Food Purchases-A Randomised Controlled Trial. Nutrients 2017, 9, 1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Deschasaux, M.; Huybrechts, I.; Julia, C.; Hercberg, S.; Egnell, M.; Srour, B.; Kesse-Guyot, E.; Latino-Martel, P.; Biessy, C.; Casagrande, C.; et al. Association between Nutritional Profiles of Foods Underlying Nutri-Score Front-of-Pack Labels and Mortality: EPIC Cohort Study in 10 European Countries. BMJ 2020, 370, m3173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Julia, C.; Leroy, P.; Adjibade, M.; Assmann, K.E.; Touvier, M.; Hercberg, S.; Soler, L.-G.; Kesse-Guyot, E. Public Health Potential of Guidelines-Based Dietary Scores for Non-Communicable Diseases Mortality Prevention: Simulation Study Using the Preventable Risk Integrated ModEl (PRIME) Model. Public Health Nutr. 2021, 24, 5539–5549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Hagmann, D.; Siegrist, M. Nutri-Score, Multiple Traffic Light and Incomplete Nutrition Labelling on Food Packages: Effects on Consumers’ Accuracy in Identifying Healthier Snack Options. Food Qual. Prefer. 2020, 83, 103894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. International Agency for Research on Cancer. The Nutri-Score: A Science-Based Front-of-Pack Nutrition Label. Helping Consumers Make Healthier Food Choices; IARC Evidence Summary Brief; IARC-WHO: Lyon, France, 2021. [Google Scholar]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Journal Statistics
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.
Download PDF
Phytochemical Combination (p-Synephrine, p-Octopamine Hydrochloride, and Hispidulin) for Improving Obesity in Obese Mice Induced by High-Fat Diet
Previous
Reply to Aguenaou et al. Comment on “Muzzioli et al. Are Front-of-Pack Labels a Health Policy Tool? Nutrients 2022, 14, 771”
Next