You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
  • Editorial
  • Open Access

8 December 2022

Bariatric Surgery: Psychosocial Aspects and Quality of Life

and
1
Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, via A. Bassi 21, 27100 Pavia, Italy
2
U.O.S. Neuropsichiatria dell’Infanzia e dell’Adolescenza—Vigevano—ASST Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Special Issue Psychosocial Aspects and Quality of Life in Bariatric Surgery: An Update and Directions for Future Research
Obesity is a major worldwide health problem, causing an ongoing and decades-long pandemic, which the WHO has termed the “global obesity epidemic”, concurrent with the COVID-19 pandemic []. The excess of adipose tissue triggers many metabolic and immunological pathways, leading to serious co-morbidities, such as impaired glucose tolerance (type 2 diabetes in the worst cases), dyslipidemia, arterial hypertension, hyperuricemia, obstructive sleep apnea, polycystic ovary syndrome, or non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.
Although lifestyle modifications and pharmacological interventions are often exploited as first-line interventions, it is clear that bariatric surgery is the most effective strategy, especially in more severe forms of obesity []. It has been reported, however, that results are improved if a multi-disciplinary management is activated, in line with the multiple aspects involved in obesity [,]. According to the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), a multidisciplinary team should include an endocrinologist and/or obesity medicine physician, a bariatric surgeon, an endoscopist experienced in bariatrics, an anaesthesiologist, a registered dietitian, an exercise specialist, a behaviour coach, a psychologist, and a nurse or physician extender that coordinates the team [].
A number of aspects regarding bariatric surgery are still debated. Some remaining open questions are directly connected to surgical procedures. Firstly, although laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is considered the current technique of choice, given its efficacy and the reduced impact of side effects compared to other interventions [], a number of other options are available and could be better suited in specific situations, including “traditional” Roux-en-Y-gastric by-pass, vertical-banded gastroplasty, and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y-gastric by-pass.
Another relevant aspect that has only recently been studied in detail is the metabolic effect of bariatric surgery. Moreover, a recent paper suggested that to manage the complexity of metabolomics it could be useful to exploit artificial intelligence []. However, it is clear that any form of bariatric surgery has a significant impact on nutrients absorption but also on other aspects, including changes in food choice, taste, desire and enjoyment [].
The results of bariatric surgery were initially evaluated in terms of the reduction in body weight or body mass index. Data concerning psychosocial effects are interesting and seem to confirm an improvement in the Quality of Life of bariatric patients by increasing their possibility of having a complete social life []. The additional utility of psychological support in improving psychosocial outcomes of bariatric surgery, compared to a merely surgical and medical approach, is less clear: a recent review of research, applying a Bayesian approach, found very uncertain evidence and suggested more high quality studies in the field []. However, it is clear that bariatric surgery requires a multi-disciplinary approach to manage patients’ difficulties in achieving healthier eating [], and this kind of intervention can also be useful to improve self-reported mental health and quality of life, in addition to reducing cardiovascular risk factors []. In this context, it is not surprising that few studies attempted to link specific pre-operative factors to psychosocial results and/or to the need for psychological or psychiatric intervention. However, this line of research is promising, as evidenced by a recent study in candidates of bariatric surgery where a reduced score in the mental domain of Quality of Life, as explored by the 12-item Short Form Health Survey, was associated with a lower pre-treatment BMI [], with a possible impact on surgical outcomes. Moreover, epidemiological data and clinical research suggest that bariatric surgery may hamper some patients’ mental health, with an increased risk of self-harm and suicide [].
Almost all the above-mentioned studies were conducted on adult subjects. Only in recent times has a growing body of literature concerning adolescents been published. It is clear that bariatric surgery, and especially laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, is at least as effective as in adults []; on the other hand, the possibility of obtaining results in terms of quality of life and psychosocial adjustment has been studied in far less detail.
The main objective of this Special Issue is to provide cutting-edge data regarding psychosocial aspects of bariatric surgery, including treatment options and ethical implications across different age groups.

Author Contributions

Both authors (V.M. and M.C.) equally contributed to all aspects of this manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. WHO (World Health Organization). Controlling the Global Obesity Epidemic. World Health Organization. 2020. Available online: https://www.who.int/activities/controlling-the-global-obesity-epidemic (accessed on 25 March 2021).
  2. Jakobsen, G.S.; Smastuen, M.C.; Sandbu, R.; Nordstrand, N.; Hofso, D.; Lindberg, M.; Hertel, J.K.; Hjelmesaeth, J. Association of bariatric surgery vs medical obesity treatment with long-term medical complications and obesity-related comorbidities. JAMA 2018, 319, 291–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Matteo, M.V.; D’Oria, M.; Bove, V.; Carlino, G.; Pontecorvi, V.; Cesario, A.; Scambia, G.; Costamagna, G.; Boškoski, I. Personalized Approach for Obese Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty. J. Pers. Med. 2021, 11, 1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Martinelli, V.; Chiappedi, M.; Pellegrino, E.; Zugnoni, M.; Caccialanza, R.; Muggia, C.; Cogni, G.; Chiovato, L.; Bichisao, G.; Politi, P.; et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in an adolescent with Prader-Willi syndrome: Psychosocial implications. Nutrition 2019, 61, 67–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. ASGE EndoVatorsTask Force; Ryou, M.; McQuaid, K.R.; Thompson, C.C.; Edmundowicz, S.; Mergener, K.; Dayyeh, B.A.; Apovian, C.; Burke, C.; Chand, B.; et al. ASGE EndoVators Summit: Defining the role and value of endoscopic therapies in obesity management. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2017, 86, 757–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Pantelis, A.G. Metabolomics in Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery Research and the Potential of Deep Learning in Bridging the Gap. Metabolites 2022, 12, 458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Schiavo, L.; Aliberti, S.M.; Calabrese, P.; Senatore, A.M.; Severino, L.; Sarno, G.; Iannelli, A.; Pilone, V. Changes in Food Choice, Taste, Desire, and Enjoyment 1 Year after Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Prospective Study. Nutrients 2022, 14, 2060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Gullaam Rasul, S.F.; Draman, N.; Muhamad, R.; Yudin, Z.M.; Abdul Rahman, R.; Draman, S.; Md Hashim, M.N. Lived Experience after Bariatric Surgery among Patients with Morbid Obesity in East Coast Peninsular Malaysia: A Qualitative Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 6009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Storman, D.; Swierz, M.J.; Storman, M.; Jasinska, K.W.; Jemioło, P.; Bała, M.M. Psychological Interventions and Bariatric Surgery among People with Clinically Severe Obesity—A Systematic Review with Bayesian Meta-Analysis. Nutrients 2022, 14, 1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Brazil, J.F.; Gibson, I.; Dunne, D.; Hynes, L.B.; Harris, A.; Bakir, M.; Collins, C.; Foy, S.; Seery, S.; Bassett, P.; et al. Improved Quality of Life, Fitness, Mental Health and Cardiovascular Risk Factors with a Publicly Funded Bariatric Lifestyle Intervention for Adults with Severe Obesity: A Prospective Cohort Study. Nutrients 2021, 13, 4172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Martinelli, V.; Cappa, A.; Zugnoni, M.; Cappello, S.; Masi, S.; Klersy, C.; Pellegrino, E.; Muggia, C.; Cavallotto, C.; Politi, P.; et al. Quality of life and psychopathology in candidates to bariatric surgery: Relationship with BMI class. Eat. Weight Disord. 2021, 26, 703–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Spitta, M.J.; Frühbeck, G. Bariatric surgery: Many benefits, but emerging risks. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018, 6, 161–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Calcaterra, V.; Cena, H.; Pelizzo, G.; Porri, D.; Regalbuto, C.; Vinci, F.; Destro, F.; Vestri, E.; Verduci, E.; Bosetti, A.; et al. Bariatric Surgery in Adolescents: To Do or Not to Do? Children 2021, 8, 453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.