sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Sustainability and Project Management

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Economic and Business Aspects of Sustainability".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 May 2021) | Viewed by 71834

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website1 Website2
Guest Editor
Escuela Politécnica Superior, Department of Civil Engineering, University of A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain
Interests: sustainability assessment, optimization, and management; project management; sustainable assessment for decision-making; sustainable design in construction and energy engineering; sustainable energy planning
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Escuela Politécnica Superior, Department of Civil Engineering, University of A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain
Interests: project management; sustainability assessment, optimization, and management; sustainable assessment for decision-making; sustainable design in construction and energy engineering; sustainable energy planning
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals
Escuela Politécnica Superior, Departamento de Ciencias de la Navegación e Ingeniería Marina, University of A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain
Interests: energy economics; sustainable energy planning; sustainability assessment, optimization, and management; sustainable assessment for decision-making; project management; sustainable design in energy engineering; industrial heritage; sustainability assessment and optimization in the energy sector; multi-criteria decision methods; optimization techniques; Monte Carlo simulation; energy planning; renewable and non-renewable power plants; life-cycle analysis in the energy sector

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Escola Politécnica de Enxeñaría de Ferrol, Universidade da Coruña, 15403 Ferrol, Spain
Interests: sustainability assessment and optimization in the energy sector; multicriteria decision methods; optimization techniques; Monte Carlo simulation; energy planning; renewable and nonrenewable power plants; life-cycle analysis in the energy sector
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Sustainability is based on the concept of sustainable development. This concept could allow current generations to meet their needs and have a healthy and productive life in harmony with nature, without compromising the ability of future generations to do the same. Therefore, integral sustainability rests on at least three pillars, based on environmental, social, and economic concerns that have to be taken into account throughout the entire life cycle of the activity, product, or service in question.


The environmental pillar must be aimed at preserving the planet in conditions suitable for life. Without it, the human race could not survive, and there could be neither society nor, therefore, economic activity. Consequently, it is the most important pillar.


The social pillar is second in importance and entails, among other issues, generating suitable employment, minimizing risks to the population, and reducing socio-economic differences among the different population strata, and among different regions and countries. It is easy to understand that this pillar is related to ethical and cultural aspects. Neglecting the social pillar could lead the majority of the population into a mere survival economy, seriously affecting economic activity. National or international conflicts may also arise.


All of the above does not diminish the importance of the economic pillar, which is closely connected to the other two.


Moreover, in certain cases, some authors include a fourth pillar of sustainability: the technical, functional, or performance pillar. Thus, for example, if for a given activity we have to choose between products with different environmental, social, and economic consequences, the performance of such products may also differ.


In short, sustainability is ideally about being able to maintain life on the planet indefinitely, in suitable conditions for all species. Unfortunately, sustainability is in its infancy, and for now nothing is strictly sustainable. Almost all human activities have some impact on the planet—a situation which cannot be maintained indefinitely. Perhaps, in the future, by employing new technologies, strict sustainability could be achieved. For now, moving towards sustainability means looking for the solutions with the least impact, designing and using products and services with the lowest environmental and social footprint, with the better life-cycle cost.


Nevertheless, the planet is giving warning signals. We do not know how much time we have before we face very serious or even fatal environmental, social, and economic problems, whether reversible or irreversible. Time may be running out. The entire world population, and especially the scientific community, must work quickly and exhaustively in this field. Project management specialists must also be involved.


A project is a human effort to create a product or service, or other unique outcome, in a limited period of time. Traditionally, project objectives have been defined in terms of scope, time, cost, and quality, although there may be other objectives. Today, every project should have sustainability objectives. Ideally, there should be an environmental objective, one related to social responsibility, and the cost objective should cover the entire life cycle of the project. A global sustainability objective could also be set, using multi-criteria methods to integrate these three objectives.


Project management consists of a set of activities aimed at achieving project objectives. Companies and public institutions develop a growing number of projects, as well as programmes made up of several interrelated projects. Many of these are exclusively project-oriented organizations. Project managers may work towards sustainability without outside help. It is therefore important for them to be prepared for this so that they can take a proactive approach towards sustainability. The same can be said of the programme manager, perhaps even more so. However, both often have limitations or barriers related to their own knowledge and experience, corporate policies, stakeholder pressures, and the project team.


Within public bodies, decision-makers are influenced by the political system and the periodic nature of governments. At the same time, many business managers concentrate on the immediate economic profitability. In some cases, they only consider the mere business “sustainability”, with a different approach to the one discussed here. The environment in which these organizations exist favors this situation. These attitudes run counter to the true concept of sustainability, which has a broader scope and is conceived for the very long term.


The greatest levels of effectiveness can only be obtained if corporate management directs the organization towards true sustainability, transforming the organizational culture. In this sense, the project portfolio manager can have more influence than programme and project managers.


In terms of sustainability and project management, various authors have adopted different approaches. One is focused on designing and developing a product that is as sustainable as possible; this approach does not have much to do with project management. Another is to ensure that current project management processes include sustainability aspects.


We believe that the most crucial approach is one that strives for new processes for managing sustainability objectives. Sustainability should not be a cross-cutting issue in current project management processes; it should be a specific process in its own right. The scientific community must provide project management associations with the necessary ideas to expand and improve their standards of practice in this field.

Thus, recommended topics include, but are not limited to:

  • Theoretical and conceptual aspects.
  • Processes for managing the sustainability objectives in projects, and interrelations with the other project management processes (integration, scope, time, cost or quality, among others).
  • Issues and challenges, critical success factors and benefits of sustainable project management.
  • Risks and opportunities, and their management, in projects for obtaining sustainable products.
  • Techniques and tools (indicators, modelling, estimation, assessment, simulation, decision-making):
    • For establishing, monitoring, and controlling sustainability objectives in projects (i.e., environmental, social, economic, and global sustainability objectives).
    • For including sustainability in the feasibility assessment of projects.
    • For selecting sustainable project portfolios.
  • Sustainability-oriented transformation of project-driven organizations and stakeholders, including aspects related to ethics and corporate culture, among other issues.
  • Project team: competencies and attitudes, and their influence on sustainable project management.
  • Education and training.
  • Real case studies related to the previous topics, including success and failure stories, among others.

Prof. Dr. Alfredo del Caño
Dr. M. Pilar de la Cruz López
Dr. Manuel Lara
Dr. Juan José Cartelle Barros
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • sustainability
  • project management processes
  • techniques and tools
  • risks and opportunities
  • portfolio selection
  • sustainable-oriented transformation
  • competencies and attitudes
  • education and training
  • critical success factors
  • real case studies

Published Papers (11 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

17 pages, 1901 KiB  
Article
Towards Sustainable I4.0: Key Skill Areas for Project Managers in GCC Construction Industry
by Tariq Al Amri, Katalin Puskas Khetani and Manuel Marey-Perez
Sustainability 2021, 13(15), 8121; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158121 - 21 Jul 2021
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 3731
Abstract
Industry 4.0 (I4.0) grew from and is guided by smart manufacturing. The fourth industrial revolution’s I4.0 would induce radical changes and transformations in the everyday operations of businesses and people’s life. Due to these major changes impacting all sectors and industries worldwide, the [...] Read more.
Industry 4.0 (I4.0) grew from and is guided by smart manufacturing. The fourth industrial revolution’s I4.0 would induce radical changes and transformations in the everyday operations of businesses and people’s life. Due to these major changes impacting all sectors and industries worldwide, the sustainability of the new future systems and operations is pertinent. The current research literature points out that the social (human factor) aspect is relatively underrepresented in the I4.0 sustainability-related studies. The few studies related to the social aspect usually investigate the so-called ‘techno-centric’ approach to the subject. This study aimed to investigate the I4.0 construction project management (PM) profession from the socially sustainable ‘worker-centric’ approach. Five key assets of the new I4.0 project managers role, specifically in the construction industry, were explored to achieve this goal. This was conducted through a survey questionnaire aimed at 100 construction project managers based in Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) region. The overall research results showed that academic and professional qualifications were found to be key factors in the process of adapting to the new I4.0 methodologies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability and Project Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

27 pages, 721 KiB  
Article
New Approach for Managing Sustainability in Projects
by María Pilar de la Cruz López, Juan José Cartelle Barros, Alfredo del Caño Gochi and Manuel Lara Coira
Sustainability 2021, 13(13), 7037; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137037 - 23 Jun 2021
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 3698
Abstract
Despite the work done to date, project sustainability management (PSM) is still at an embryonic stage. The existing literature considers sustainability as a transversal aspect to be incorporated into the traditional management functions (scope, time, cost, quality, etc.). This article proposes sustainability as [...] Read more.
Despite the work done to date, project sustainability management (PSM) is still at an embryonic stage. The existing literature considers sustainability as a transversal aspect to be incorporated into the traditional management functions (scope, time, cost, quality, etc.). This article proposes sustainability as a key aspect of project management, with three essential components: principles, processes and competences. Regarding principles, the principle of sustainable development should be added to those generally suggested. As for processes, seven are proposed for (1) planning sustainability management; (2) establishing a sustainability breakdown structure; (3) defining the sustainability objective; (4) identifying project alternatives to achieve it; (5) planning and (6) implementing the sustainability strategy; and (7) monitoring and control. The main interrelationships between these processes and those of project initiation, planning, implementation, control, and closure are also analysed. In addition, the competences that the project manager should have in this field are identified, as well as the main criteria to take into account in order to adapt PSM processes to the characteristics of the project and the organisation. Finally, the results of a Delphi analysis carried out to validate these proposals are presented. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability and Project Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 5022 KiB  
Article
Dynamic Portfolio Selection in Gas Transmission Projects Considering Sustainable Strategic Alignment and Project Interdependencies through Value Analysis
by Fahime Lotfian Delouyi, Seyed Hassan Ghodsypour and Maryam Ashrafi
Sustainability 2021, 13(10), 5584; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105584 - 17 May 2021
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 2627
Abstract
Selecting a sustainable cross-country natural gas pipeline project portfolio plays a vital role in enhancing energy security and national self-reliance. The interdependencies between projects augment the complexity of project portfolio selection. Hence, the selection must be done with sustainable strategic alignment and adjustment [...] Read more.
Selecting a sustainable cross-country natural gas pipeline project portfolio plays a vital role in enhancing energy security and national self-reliance. The interdependencies between projects augment the complexity of project portfolio selection. Hence, the selection must be done with sustainable strategic alignment and adjustment of ongoing projects to determine the most suitable project portfolio. This is while they have barely been addressed simultaneously in the literature. The aim of the present study is to fill in the mentioned gap by establishing an integrated framework incorporating the organization strategies, project interdependencies, and ongoing projects in the project portfolio selection problem. This presented framework uses network mapping to visualize project interdependencies and improve the quality of the resulting decision. The decision-aid approach of Measuring Attractiveness by a Categorical Based Evaluation Technique (MACBETH) was employed to tackle multi-criteria value measurement in project portfolio selection. Applicability and validity of the proposed framework were tested using the case study of the Iranian Gas Engineering and Development Company (IGEDC). The pipeline project portfolios were analyzed on the basis of experts’ opinions with regard to technical and sustainability strategic criteria (economic, environmental, and social pillars). Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability and Project Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 2615 KiB  
Article
Monitoring the Implementation of Exponential Organizations through the Assessment of Their Project Portfolio: Case Study
by Marina Díaz-Piloneta, Francisco Ortega-Fernández, Henar Morán-Palacios and Vicente Rodríguez-Montequín
Sustainability 2021, 13(2), 464; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020464 - 06 Jan 2021
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 6129
Abstract
Many organizations are currently face significant challenges in terms of sustainability and technological development. Achieving sustainability in business activities, interweaving social, economic, and environmental perspectives, is one of the most challenging goals for companies. On the other hand, as technology advances exponentially, organizations [...] Read more.
Many organizations are currently face significant challenges in terms of sustainability and technological development. Achieving sustainability in business activities, interweaving social, economic, and environmental perspectives, is one of the most challenging goals for companies. On the other hand, as technology advances exponentially, organizations grow in a linear way. This fact causes a gap which increases over the time. Models and tools have been developed to try to solve both problems separately; on one side to make the organization grow exponentially, and on the other side to incorporate sustainability into the business model. However, they do not allow enough time to know if the actions carried out really achieve their aim. The model presented provides a solution to both problems by monitoring the evolution of organizations towards an exponential structure through the analysis of the project portfolio. The main objective is to know how the orientation of ongoing projects has changed during the last period, in order to position them in terms of achieving the desired sustainability-oriented transformation. With the model designed, it is possible to know if the actions developed by the company are really heading towards a sustainable model and exponential growth. With the aim of validating the model, it has been applied in an innovation organization. With this model, the level of exponential progress of the organization was determined, as well as the goals that have been attained best and worst so far. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability and Project Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 836 KiB  
Article
Critical Success Factors of the Project Management in Relation to Industry 4.0 for Sustainability of Projects
by Jaroslav Vrchota, Petr Řehoř, Monika Maříková and Martin Pech
Sustainability 2021, 13(1), 281; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010281 - 30 Dec 2020
Cited by 68 | Viewed by 21037
Abstract
Sustainability has recently become a phenomenon; small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are increasingly emphasizing the principles of sustainability in their corporate governance. They implement these changes through project management. The purpose of the paper is to determine the critical success factors in project [...] Read more.
Sustainability has recently become a phenomenon; small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are increasingly emphasizing the principles of sustainability in their corporate governance. They implement these changes through project management. The purpose of the paper is to determine the critical success factors in project management, as seen by the managers of Czech manufacturing enterprises, related to the most to the successful completion of the projects. We aim to analyze the relation of these success factors to Industry 4.0, Human Resources, and sustainability. We determined the possible interconnectedness of the critical success factors using correlation coefficients. Then, we compared them using the Mann-Whitney test with new corporate management trends. The results show that companies consider Leadership and Experiences, and Employees and Flexibility to be key factors in project management’s success. The most important critical factor for the sustainability of projects focused on Industry 4.0 is the finances that decide the implementation of projects. The benefits of Industry 4.0 concerning sustainability have been identified in projects aimed at implementing new energy sources. In addition to the results obtained, the development of a methodology for evaluating Industry 4.0 projects’ success concerning sustainability may be based on critical success factors in the future. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability and Project Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 898 KiB  
Article
Evaluating Disruptive Innovation Project Management Capabilities
by Mikel Zubizarreta, Jaione Ganzarain, Jesús Cuadrado and Rafael Lizarralde
Sustainability 2021, 13(1), 1; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010001 - 22 Dec 2020
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 6666
Abstract
Firms must adapt to a business environment in constant flux. Economic and political factors and the constant interruption of new technologies force firms and organizations to change and to adapt, so that they are not left behind. Over recent years, the development of [...] Read more.
Firms must adapt to a business environment in constant flux. Economic and political factors and the constant interruption of new technologies force firms and organizations to change and to adapt, so that they are not left behind. Over recent years, the development of disruptive innovations has completely revolutionized past scenarios. These innovations break with what is already established and firms from various sectors face no choice other than to incorporate them into their project management portfolios, so as to ensure survival and business sustainability. Using MIVES methodology as its foundation, a business sustainability management model is presented in this paper for the management of disruptive innovation projects that a firm may wish to develop within a given sector. The management model is designed to facilitate disruptive innovation project management for firms within technological-industrial sectors, by assessing the sustainability of the project. The model is applied to two firms, one from the machine-tooling sector and another from the construction sector. Finally, a sensitivity analysis was performed, the results of which verified the validity and the stability of the proposed model. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability and Project Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 285 KiB  
Article
Adopting Agile Project Management Practices in Non-Software SMEs: A Case Study of a Slovenian Medium-Sized Manufacturing Company
by Tena Žužek, Žiga Gosar, Janez Kušar and Tomaž Berlec
Sustainability 2020, 12(21), 9245; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219245 - 06 Nov 2020
Cited by 21 | Viewed by 10484
Abstract
In today’s highly dynamic and unpredictable project environment, companies need to be able to manage changes quickly and effectively, otherwise, the final product will not be current and will only go to waste. Traditional project management approaches that focus on planning are no [...] Read more.
In today’s highly dynamic and unpredictable project environment, companies need to be able to manage changes quickly and effectively, otherwise, the final product will not be current and will only go to waste. Traditional project management approaches that focus on planning are no longer efficient and companies are forced to adopt new ways of working. As a result, more flexible agile project management (APM) approaches have emerged over the last decades. Originally developed for the software industry, APM is now increasingly recognized and adopted also by other industry sectors. However, due to some discipline-specific differences, the adoption of APM by non-software companies is challenging and requires many adjustments and high financial input. While the larger organizations have sufficient resources to make such a transition, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) generally cannot afford to do so, and therefore need alternative strategies to increase their agility and stay competitive on the global market. In this paper, we present a case study of a Slovenian medium-sized manufacturing company that implemented only certain APM practices separately and not as part of a structured APM methodology, and still managed to achieve significant benefits: improved communication, faster detection of discrepancies, more effective problem-solving and greater flexibility. The results also suggest that APM practices, even when implemented separately, positively impact project success in terms of both efficiency and stakeholder satisfaction, and can thus help in establishing an economically, socially, and environmentally more sustainable workplace. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability and Project Management)
21 pages, 1129 KiB  
Article
Study of Social and Environmental Needs for the Selection of Sustainable Criteria in the Procurement of Public Works
by Laura Montalbán-Domingo, Madeleine Aguilar-Morocho, Tatiana García-Segura and Eugenio Pellicer
Sustainability 2020, 12(18), 7756; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187756 - 19 Sep 2020
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 2730
Abstract
Fostering sustainability in the construction industry has been claimed; however, important barriers are hindering its implementation in public procurement. The main reason is the lack of knowledge about what sustainability criteria should be included and the high level of subjectivity in the definition [...] Read more.
Fostering sustainability in the construction industry has been claimed; however, important barriers are hindering its implementation in public procurement. The main reason is the lack of knowledge about what sustainability criteria should be included and the high level of subjectivity in the definition of their level of importance. Both aspects should be addressed depending on the specific context of each country. Therefore, the aim of this research focused on identifying the sustainability shortcomings that exist in each European Union country in order to determine the level of importance of each sustainability category. Five environmental categories and eight social categories were established, and, to assess the sustainability performance of the 28 European countries, 42 national indicators were selected and the Promethee method was undertaken to rank the countries. Finally, through a cluster analysis, two groups of countries were identified. The first group consisted of the most economically developed European Union countries. These countries need to focus mainly on the environmental performance. However, the second group needs to make an effort in social sustainability at the same time, which controls their environmental performance. This research provides guidance on the decision-making with regard to the inclusion of sustainability in public procurement of the construction industry. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability and Project Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1431 KiB  
Article
Study of Major-Accident Risk Assessment Techniques in the Environmental Impact Assessment Process
by José Luis Fuentes-Bargues, Mª José Bastante-Ceca, Pablo Sebastián Ferrer-Gisbert and Mª Carmen González-Cruz
Sustainability 2020, 12(14), 5770; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145770 - 17 Jul 2020
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 6839
Abstract
Design, implementation, and operation of any project are affected by the environment where it is developed; at the same time, the project will influence the environment, since during its life cycle it can cause an impact on it. This impact can lead to [...] Read more.
Design, implementation, and operation of any project are affected by the environment where it is developed; at the same time, the project will influence the environment, since during its life cycle it can cause an impact on it. This impact can lead to social, economic, and environmental results. Directive 2014/52/EU, on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment, reflects the obligation for the project promoter to consider, in the Environmental Impact Study (EIS) of the project, their vulnerability (exposure and resilience) to major accidents and/or disasters, evaluating both the risk and their effects on the environment, in case these major accidents and/or disasters appear. The IEC 31.010:2019 Risk management—Risk assessment techniques standard defines 45 risk appreciation techniques that are useful when analysing the risks, in general. The objective of this paper is to review these 45 techniques, and establish which ones can be used for the assessment of accidents or disasters required in the specific environmental impact assessment process to accomplish with the regulation. After the revision, the authors propose five risks appreciation techniques that could be used for the assessment of major accidents and or disasters in projects for which EIA has to be carried out. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability and Project Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 557 KiB  
Article
An Approach to Increase the Sustainability of Projects and their Outcomes in Public Sector through Improving Project Definition
by Dorota Kuchta and Jagoda Mrzygłocka-Chojnacka
Sustainability 2020, 12(12), 4804; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124804 - 12 Jun 2020
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3146
Abstract
The pressure to incorporate sustainability principles and objectives into policies and activities is growing, particularly in project management. A successful project cannot disregard any of the three triple bottom line (TBL) sustainability pillars (economic, social and environmental). Stakeholders representing each of those pillars [...] Read more.
The pressure to incorporate sustainability principles and objectives into policies and activities is growing, particularly in project management. A successful project cannot disregard any of the three triple bottom line (TBL) sustainability pillars (economic, social and environmental). Stakeholders representing each of those pillars have to be satisfied to a certain degree in each successful project, even if the way of balancing the three pillars varies depending on project type. Project definition is of primary importance for the proper addressing of stakeholder expectations during the project, and thus for project success. The problem is that project definitions in practice are not written in a way which would guarantee a sufficient degree of project sustainability. However, the hypothesis can be formulated that a systematic analysis and modification of project definition can increase the degree of project sustainability, and thus the degree of project success. That is why we propose here a method of checking and improving existing project definitions in order to improve the chances of project success through increasing the satisfaction of the stakeholders representing the three TBL pillars. The method is based on a careful identification of missing and ambiguous information in a project definition and on correcting it on the basis of TBL stakeholders’ opinions and preferences. These preferences are modelled, wherever possible, by means of fuzzy sets, in order to provide a systematic, formal measurement of sustainability degree in TBL sustainability pillars, represented by project stakeholders. The method’s use and potential advantages are illustrated by means of two real world projects. The initial verification of the method allows us to formulate the hypothesis that analysing and improving project definition may considerably contribute to increasing the sustainability degree of projects, and thus to their success. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability and Project Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 1971 KiB  
Article
Optimisation Techniques for Managing the Project Sustainability Objective: Application to a Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger
by Juan José Cartelle Barros, Manuel Lara Coira, María Pilar de la Cruz López, Alfredo del Caño Gochi and Isabel Soares
Sustainability 2020, 12(11), 4480; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114480 - 01 Jun 2020
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2101
Abstract
In addition to traditional project management objectives (cost, time, scope and quality, among others), it is now necessary to include a global sustainability objective in all projects, regardless of their nature and scale. The processes for managing this objective may include sub-processes for [...] Read more.
In addition to traditional project management objectives (cost, time, scope and quality, among others), it is now necessary to include a global sustainability objective in all projects, regardless of their nature and scale. The processes for managing this objective may include sub-processes for optimising the sustainability of some or all of the project’s deliverables. In this paper an integrated optimisation technique was applied to optimise the design of a shell and tube heat exchanger (STHE) by taking into account economic, social and environmental indicators. A case study previously analysed in the literature, although with different objectives and scope, was considered for such a purpose. Diverse sets of weights were defined for the environmental impacts, as well as two additional cases. In the first one, all the indicators where assessed in a linear way. Non-linearities were studied in the second one. Both non-nature-inspired (exhaustive search and Monte Carlo simulation) and nature-inspired (Particle Swarm Optimisation, Crow Search Algorithm and Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm-II) optimisation techniques were used to solve the problem. The results were presented and discussed in depth. The findings show the necessity of applying these kinds of methodologies in the design of energy systems and, in particular, STHEs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability and Project Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop