sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

ESG as a Catalyst for Business Sustainability: Theoretical Insights and Practical Applications

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Economic and Business Aspects of Sustainability".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 20 May 2026 | Viewed by 20379

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Marketing, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong
Interests: marketing strategies; sustainable marketing; channel management; international marketing
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China
Interests: corporate sustainable development and social responsibility; safety management

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Management and Economics, North China University of Water Resources & Electric Power, Zhengzhou, China
Interests: marketing strategies; artificial intelligence in business; sustainable marketing; service innovation and entrepreneurship
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Under the concurrent challenges posed by the global energy crisis and climate change, enterprises, functioning as the principal actors in economic activities, wield substantial influence over both the environment and society [1]. Consequently, it is indisputable that enterprises play a pivotal role in combatting climate change and fostering environmental sustainability [2,3]. Currently, the function of enterprises’ sustainable development has evolved beyond its traditional focus on economic interests and internal operations, adopting an overarching ecological perspective. In other words, enterprises no longer view themselves as isolated economic entities solely driven by profit and growth, but as integral constituents of a larger ecosystem. This shift reflects a deeper understanding of the interdependent relationship between their business activities and the broader ecological environment.

In this context, sustainable management, a business philosophy emphasizing corporate social responsibility, has gained widespread traction among managers, practitioners, and customers. Among the various approaches to business sustainability management, the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) sustainable development model stands out for its comprehensive evaluation of enterprise performance across three crucial dimensions: the environment, society, and corporate governance [7,8]. Hence, conducting in-depth research on ESG performance undeniably holds profound theoretical and practical implications for advancing the sustainable management of enterprises.

A scientifically sound, rationally designed, and effectively implemented ESG strategy can not only offer clear guidelines for enterprises to address global challenges, such as the energy crisis and climate change, but also enable them to distinguish themselves in the market, facilitating a win–win scenario that balances economic and sustainable development. Within the ESG framework, sustainable business is gradually emerging as a novel paradigm of business activity. The business sustainability model offers numerous advantages: it enhances organizations' risk management capabilities and unlocks opportunities for diversification and value generation across various sectors [12,13]. Many industries and companies have successfully employed sustainability models to achieve economic, environmental, and social goals concurrently.

Business sustainability models possess considerable potential for integrating sustainability concepts and goals into firms' value propositions, value creation, and value capture processes. They endeavor to advance sustainable development goals by fostering proactive multi-stakeholder management, driving innovation, and adopting long-term visions. Notably, the business sustainability model provides organizations with efficient solutions to fulfill the dual goals of economic and sustainable development in tandem, thereby significantly mitigating the adverse environmental and societal impacts of their operations.

ESG practices, however, face notable challenges in areas such as technical innovation and capital investment. These challenges include difficulties in the research and development of environmental protection solutions, along with limited market demand for sustainable products and services, among other issues. As a result, firms often need to balance the inputs and outputs associated with ESG initiatives [17,18]. Additionally, various stakeholders exert complex and sometimes conflicting influences on the establishment of business sustainability models within firms. Meeting the diverse demands of these stakeholders presents significant challenges for enterprises in balancing the interests and requirements of all parties during the decision-making process [19–21].

Therefore, extensive research and exploration is still required to address the development and implementation of enterprise ESG initiatives and to refine business sustainability models. This Special Issue seeks to advance understanding in this domain by presenting original research, theoretical analyses, case studies, and comprehensive literature reviews. By doing so, it aims to offer valuable insights into the theory and practice of fostering corporate business sustainability and ESG adoption on a global scale.

Topics of Interest

In this Special Issue, we welcome original research articles and review papers. Potential research areas may include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • How can the ESG model be effectively integrated with business sustainability?
  • What are the best practices for ESG measurement, reporting, and accountability in sustainable businesses?
  • What strategies can businesses adopt to address climate risks and energy crises through sustainability?
  • How do corporate executives' characteristics influence ESG performance?
  • What role does sustainable marketing play in consumer support for business sustainability?
  • How does ESG performance affect firm behavior and decision-making?
  • What practices in the value chain, supply chain, and industrial chain contribute to business sustainability?
  • What are the implications of industry, country, or region-specific ESG studies?
  • How can digital intelligence empower ESG initiatives and promote sustainable development?
  • In what ways does ESG contribute to corporate risk identification and management?
  • How does green and sustainable finance support the achievement of sustainable development goals?
  • What impact do ESG initiatives have on corporate reputation and brand equity?
  • How do ESG frameworks vary across different industries, and what can be learned from these comparisons?
  • What technological innovations enhance ESG practices and reporting?
  • How do consumers perceive brands with strong ESG commitments?
  • How do ESG factors influence investment decisions and portfolio management?
  • What are some case studies of successful business transformations driven by ESG-driven innovation?
  • How do corporate governance structures affect ESG performance?
  • What role does corporate social responsibility (CSR) play in shaping ESG strategies?
  • How effective are ESG ratings, and what are their implications for investors?
  • What cross-cultural factors influence the adoption and implementation of ESG practices?
  • How does ESG performance interact with employee engagement within organizations?
  • What are the best practices and challenges of implementing ESG in supply chain management?
  • How do policy frameworks impact the adoption of ESG practices in different regions?
  • What has been the evolution of ESG standards and regulations globally?
  • How can education and training promote ESG awareness among business leaders?

References:

  1. Wang, J., Zhuang, J., Yan, C., & Chan, K. C. Standing Up or Standing By: Abnormally Hot Temperatures and Corporate Environmental Engagement. Bus. Ethics. 2024, 1–35.
  2. Lu, H., Xu, W., Cai, S., Yang, F., & Chen, Q. Does top management team responsible leadership help employees go green? The role of green human resource management and environmental felt‐ Corp Soc Resp Env Ma. 2022, 29(4), 843–859.
  3. Ren, S., Zhou, Q., Zhang, X., & Zeng, H. How do heavily polluting firms cope with dual environmental regulation? A study from the perspective of financial asset allocation. Energy Econ. 2024, 139, 107915.
  4. Yang, N., Zang, X., & Chen, C. Inheritance patterns under cultural ecology theory for the sustainable development of traditional handicrafts. 2022, 14(22), 14719.
  5. Brychko, M., Bilan, Y., Lyeonov, S., & Streimikiene, D. Do changes in the business environment and sustainable development really matter for enhancing enterprise development? Sustain Dev. 2023, 31(2), 587–599.
  6. Painter, M., Hibbert, S., & Cooper, T. The development of responsible and sustainable business practice: Value, mind-sets, business-models. Bus. Ethics. 2019, 157, 885–891.
  7. Yu, K., Wu, Q., Chen, X., Wang, W., & Mardani, A. An integrated MCDM framework for evaluating the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) sustainable business performance. Oper. Res. 2023, 1–32.
  8. Ma, Y. M., Deng, Z., Teng, Y., Yang, Z., & Zheng, V. Firms’ Multi-sided Platform Construction Efforts and ESG Performance: An Information Processing Theory Perspective. Mark. Manag. 2023, 115, 455–469.
  9. Ma, Y., Teng, Y., Deng, Z., & Yang, Z. Does Firm Carbon Disclosure Increase Consumers’ Recycling Willingness and Firms’ Recycling Performance? Strat. Env. 2023, 32(4), 2451–2470.
  10. Annesi, N., Battaglia, M., Ceglia, I., & Mercuri, F. Navigating paradoxes: building a sustainable strategy for an integrated ESG corporate governance. Decis 2024.
  11. Lüdeke-Freund, F., & Dembek, K. Sustainable business model research and practice: Emerging field or passing fancy? Clean. Prod. 2017, 168, 1668–1678.
  12. Porter, M.E., Kramer, M.R. Creating shared value. Bus. Rev. 2011, 89, 62–77.
  13. Geissdoerfer, M., Vladimirova, D., & Evans, S. Sustainable business model innovation: A review. Clean. Prod. 2018, 198, 401–416.
  14. Evans, S., Vladimirova, D., Holgado, M., Van Fossen, K., Yang, M., Silva, E. A., & Barlow, C. Y. Business model innovation for sustainability: Towards a unified perspective for creation of sustainable business models. Strategy Environ. 2017, 26(5), 597–608.
  15. Boons, F.; Lüdeke-Freund, F. Business models for sustainable innovation: State-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda. Clean. Prod. 2013, 45, 9–19.
  16. Charles, O.H., Jr.; Schmidheiny, S.; Watts, P. Walking the Talk: The Business Case for Sustainable Development; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2017.
  17. Zhai, Y., Cai, Z., Lin, H., Yuan, M., Mao, Y., & Yu, M. Does better environmental, social, and governance induce better corporate green innovation: The mediating role of financing constraints. Corp Soc Resp Env Ma. 2022, 29(5), 1513–1526.
  18. Taddeo, S., Agnese, P., & Busato, F. Rethinking the effect of ESG practices on profitability through cross-dimensional substitutability. Environ. Manage. 2024, 352, 120115.
  19. Ge, G., Xiao, X., Li, Z., & Dai, Q. Does ESG performance promote high-quality development of enterprises in China? The mediating role of innovation input. Sustainability 2022, 14(7), 3843.
  20. Lu, H., Yang, F., Xu, S., Liu, X., & Yang, Z. Is corporate greening beneficial? Exploring the relationship between perceived corporate environmental behavior and organizational citizenship behavior. Strategy Environ. 2023, 32(4), 2360–2372.
  21. Qi, B., & Yang, Z. Board Group Faultlines, Slack Resource, and Corporate Carbon Performance. Sustainability 2022, 14(20), 13053.

Prof. Dr. Zhilin Yang
Prof. Dr. Hui Lu
Prof. Dr. Gang Li
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • sustainable development
  • ESG (environment, social and governance)
  • business sustainability
  • corporate social responsibility
  • environmental management
  • climate change
  • digitalization
  • innovation and sustainability
  • green finance

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (10 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

27 pages, 722 KB  
Article
The Effect of ESG on Firms’ Product Market Performance and Supply Chain Spillover Effects
by Yilin Tan, Ziyang Gong, Ning Yang and Zichen Luo
Sustainability 2026, 18(10), 4717; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18104717 - 9 May 2026
Viewed by 318
Abstract
In product manufacturing and operations, firms increasingly treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) ratings as strategically important. This differs from earlier views that framed ESG mainly as a burden, whereas recent studies suggest that ESG can enhance firm value. Using panel data on [...] Read more.
In product manufacturing and operations, firms increasingly treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) ratings as strategically important. This differs from earlier views that framed ESG mainly as a burden, whereas recent studies suggest that ESG can enhance firm value. Using panel data on Chinese A-share listed firms over 2009–2022, this study examines whether ESG ratings affect product-market performance. A two-way fixed-effects model shows that better ESG ratings significantly increase market share, mainly by signaling stronger product quality and service capability. While findings from this emerging market context may have limited generalizability, results consistently show that ESG performance bolsters competitiveness, particularly in high-tech and consumer-facing sectors. Moreover, improvements in ESG ratings are positively associated with net market-share growth. The benefits extend beyond the focal firm and generate positive spillovers for downstream customers. The three ESG dimensions do not contribute equally: the Environmental (E) and Governance (G) dimensions exert stronger effects on product-market performance than the Social (S) dimension. This study provides a new perspective on understanding the value creation mechanism of ESG investment. Full article
Show Figures

Figure A1

30 pages, 543 KB  
Article
Corporate ESG Performance and Export Product Quality: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies
by Mingguo Xia, Bing Jian and Ye Tian
Sustainability 2026, 18(4), 2118; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18042118 - 20 Feb 2026
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 749
Abstract
While it is a global imperative that firms should achieve superior environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance, the specific impact of ESG on export product quality remains under-explored. Based on stakeholder theory and principal–agent theory, this paper utilizes a sample of Chinese listed [...] Read more.
While it is a global imperative that firms should achieve superior environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance, the specific impact of ESG on export product quality remains under-explored. Based on stakeholder theory and principal–agent theory, this paper utilizes a sample of Chinese listed companies and the High-Dimensional Fixed Effects (HDFE) Model to empirically examine the impact and underlying mechanisms of ESG performance on export product quality. The results indicate a U-shaped relationship between ESG performance and export product quality, a non-linear correlation that has received limited attention in the previous literature. This U-shaped relationship is more pronounced among state-owned enterprises (SOEs), firms producing non-high-tech products, and those in heavy-polluting industries. Mechanism analysis reveals that ESG performance influences export product quality primarily through three channels: innovation levels, total factor productivity (TFP), and supply chain stability. By unveiling these non-linear dynamics and their underlying pathways, this study provides a novel theoretical framework and critical empirical evidence that reconcile conflicting views on ESG effects. These findings offer important insights for policymakers and exporters seeking to align ESG practices with export objectives, thereby contributing to more sustainable and high-quality development of foreign trade in China and beyond. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 522 KB  
Article
The Impact of China’s Green Finance Policy on Corporate ESG Performance: Evidence from Green Finance Reform and Innovation Pilot Zone
by Jinxin Liu, Bowen Zhu, Bicheng Zhang and Aijun Yang
Sustainability 2026, 18(3), 1390; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18031390 - 30 Jan 2026
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 828
Abstract
Green finance policy plays a pivotal role in motivating enterprises to engage in environmental governance. Utilizing data spanning from 2009 to 2024, this research applies the difference-in-differences (DID) method to explore how the Green Finance Reform and Innovation Pilot Zone (GFRIPZ) policy influences [...] Read more.
Green finance policy plays a pivotal role in motivating enterprises to engage in environmental governance. Utilizing data spanning from 2009 to 2024, this research applies the difference-in-differences (DID) method to explore how the Green Finance Reform and Innovation Pilot Zone (GFRIPZ) policy influences the ESG performance of A-share listed companies in China. The findings reveal that the policy significantly enhances corporate ESG performance through three primary channels: alleviating financing constraints, improving profitability, and increasing green innovation capability. Moreover, the policy’s impact exhibits notable heterogeneity across regions and company types. It exerts a positive effect on ESG performance in core cities and southern regions, while its influence is negative or insignificant in non-core cities and northern regions. For high-tech and non-heavily polluting enterprises, the impact is significantly positive; however, for non-high-tech and heavily polluting enterprises, the effect is positive but statistically non-significant. Full article
Show Figures

Figure A1

11 pages, 487 KB  
Article
Financial Payoff of Sustainability in Mexican Companies: ESG Performance, Profitability and Firm Value
by Paola Ochoa-Marquez and Christina J. Gehrke
Sustainability 2026, 18(2), 682; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18020682 - 9 Jan 2026
Viewed by 732
Abstract
This study empirically investigates the relationship between Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) scores and the financial performance of Mexican companies traded at Bolsa Mexicana de Valores (BMV), based on firm value and profitability. The study used a quantitative method of correlational research. Using [...] Read more.
This study empirically investigates the relationship between Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) scores and the financial performance of Mexican companies traded at Bolsa Mexicana de Valores (BMV), based on firm value and profitability. The study used a quantitative method of correlational research. Using data from the Refinitiv, the study analyzes 103 companies operating in 37 different industries listed on the BMV over five years (2019–2023), excluding financial institutions. Ordinary least squares (OLS) regressions revealed a statistically significant, positive correlation between ESG scores associated with higher return on assets (ROA) and market value measured by Tobin’s Q). Stakeholder theory serves as the theoretical foundation, as ESG initiatives may enhance long-term value for stakeholders. The study found that ESG efforts contribute positively to ROA and Tobin’s Q of public companies in Mexico. This study focuses exclusively on Mexican companies, expanding the existing literature. Corporate decision makers and investors can gain insights into ESG’s role in Mexican companies’ financial strategy and stakeholder value creation. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 280 KB  
Article
How Do ESG Ratings Impact the Valuation of the Largest Companies in Southern Europe?
by Georgios Zairis, Nikolaos Apostolopoulos and Panagiotis Liargovas
Sustainability 2025, 17(22), 10347; https://doi.org/10.3390/su172210347 - 19 Nov 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 4366
Abstract
This paper examines the relationship between ESG ratings, as a subset of criteria and a tool for assessing sustainability, and firm performance in Southern European economies. It focuses on publicly listed large-cap companies in Portugal, Italy, Greece, and Spain. By analyzing a sample [...] Read more.
This paper examines the relationship between ESG ratings, as a subset of criteria and a tool for assessing sustainability, and firm performance in Southern European economies. It focuses on publicly listed large-cap companies in Portugal, Italy, Greece, and Spain. By analyzing a sample of 110 firms over a four-year period and applying Ohlson’s valuation model, we evaluate how ESG scores influence these companies’ performance. Our findings indicate that the social dimension is positive and statistically significant, suggesting that investors in Southern Europe increasingly prioritize value social responsibility initiatives as they aim to identify and manage ESG risks. In contrast, the Environmental and Governance components do not show statistical significance. The “polluting dummy” variable is positive and significant at the 1% level, indicating a valuation premium for high-emission firms, possibly reflecting investors’ preference for financial stability in economically volatile environments. The baseline model yields an R2 of approximately 10%, consistent with expectations given the multifactor nature of stock prices. The study contributes to the sustainability literature by highlighting the nuanced and region-specific role that ESG factors play in market valuation. We discuss limitations related to the regional scope, rating methodologies, and model specification, and offer suggestions for future research. Full article
18 pages, 659 KB  
Article
The Impact of Carbon Risk on Corporate Greenwashing Behavior: Inhibition or Promotion?
by Changjiang Zhang, Sihan Zhang, Ye Yang and Zhepeng Zhou
Sustainability 2025, 17(22), 10188; https://doi.org/10.3390/su172210188 - 14 Nov 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2043
Abstract
Climate risks arising from carbon emissions have become a major global challenge, constraining economic development and exerting complex effects on firms’ operations at the micro level. This study examines A-share-listed companies from 2009 to 2023, calculating the extent of carbon risks and the [...] Read more.
Climate risks arising from carbon emissions have become a major global challenge, constraining economic development and exerting complex effects on firms’ operations at the micro level. This study examines A-share-listed companies from 2009 to 2023, calculating the extent of carbon risks and the degree of greenwashing. Our results show that carbon risks suppress greenwashing among these enterprises, with financing constraints and the quality of internal controls positively moderating this effect from both external and internal perspectives. This suggests that the pressure imposed by carbon risks encourages enterprises to prioritize environmental concerns and actively disclose relevant information. Additionally, governments and regulatory authorities should increase their policy and regulatory pressures on these enterprises, guiding them to confront environmental challenges, assume significant responsibility for ecological protection, and formulate sustainable development strategies to enhance their competitiveness and long-term viability. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 728 KB  
Article
Merging Economic Aspirations with Sustainability: ESG and the Evolution of the Corporate Development Paradigm in China
by Changjiang Zhang, Sihan Zhang, Zhepeng Zhou and Bing He
Sustainability 2025, 17(20), 9108; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17209108 - 14 Oct 2025
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 1772
Abstract
Amid the push for sustainable and high-quality development, corporate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance has garnered increasing attention from stakeholders. This empirical study uses a 2009–2022 panel of 1264 A-share-listed companies to examine the impact of ESG performance on corporate sustainability paths [...] Read more.
Amid the push for sustainable and high-quality development, corporate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance has garnered increasing attention from stakeholders. This empirical study uses a 2009–2022 panel of 1264 A-share-listed companies to examine the impact of ESG performance on corporate sustainability paths and to identify the channels through which this impact operates. Ordinary least squares estimates show that stronger ESG performance is associated with significantly higher total factor productivity, and the effect is more pronounced in heavy-polluting industries. Mechanism tests indicate that ESG disclosure mediates this relationship, with its influence emerging over time and strengthening in subsequent years. The mediation also varies across ESG pillars, with social disclosure exerting the most decisive influence. These findings provide actionable insights—both motivating managers to strengthen their ESG engagement and informing policymakers as they seek to refine regulatory frameworks. By highlighting the value-creating role of ESG in aligning growth with sustainability, this study offers a novel perspective on corporate transformation within the context of a rapidly evolving economic landscape. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1965 KB  
Article
Promoting Conservation Intentions Through Humanized Messaging in Green Advertisements: The Mediation Roles of Empathy and Responsibility
by Yangyang Chen and Alice Ling Jiang
Sustainability 2025, 17(16), 7465; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17167465 - 18 Aug 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1839
Abstract
Plastic waste accumulation is a pressing environmental challenge that demands interdisciplinary solutions. This study investigated whether humanized messaging in green advertisements increases consumers’ conservation intentions. Grounded in self-expansion theory and dual-process theory, we propose a serial mediation model that integrates affective (empathy) and [...] Read more.
Plastic waste accumulation is a pressing environmental challenge that demands interdisciplinary solutions. This study investigated whether humanized messaging in green advertisements increases consumers’ conservation intentions. Grounded in self-expansion theory and dual-process theory, we propose a serial mediation model that integrates affective (empathy) and cognitive (perceived responsibility) pathways to explain conservation behavior in humanized environmental campaigns. We conducted a scenario-based experiment (N = 505) to test these mechanisms. Green ads that humanize marine animals significantly increased empathy, perceived responsibility, and conservation intentions. Moreover, the effect of humanized messaging on conservation intentions was sequentially mediated by heightened empathy, which in turn strengthened perceived responsibility. As a pioneering study aiming to propose and empirically test the affective–cognitive pathway, our work provides novel insights into how emotional and rational processes jointly shape environmental decision-making. The findings advance theory on consumers’ conservation behavior and provide actionable guidance for enterprises and policymakers to design evidence-based initiatives for plastic waste reduction. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 249 KB  
Article
The Impact of ESG Performance on Corporate Value in Listed Sports Companies: The Mediating Role of Intangible Assets and Moderating Role of Policy Environment
by Ying Bai, Zerui Wang, Qi Huang and Haoming Ding
Sustainability 2025, 17(6), 2523; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17062523 - 13 Mar 2025
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 5858
Abstract
This study investigates how ESG (environmental, social, and governance) performance influences the corporate value of publicly listed sports companies in China, with a focus on the mediating role of intangible assets and the moderating effect of the policy environment. Analyzing panel data from [...] Read more.
This study investigates how ESG (environmental, social, and governance) performance influences the corporate value of publicly listed sports companies in China, with a focus on the mediating role of intangible assets and the moderating effect of the policy environment. Analyzing panel data from 41 A-share sports firms over 2009–2023 using a two-way fixed-effects model, the findings reveal that a robust ESG performance significantly enhances corporate value by strengthening brand equity and optimizing resource allocation. Intangible assets, particularly brand value, serve as pivotal mediators in translating ESG efforts into market value. Furthermore, the policy environment plays a critical moderating role: state-owned enterprises (SOEs) exhibit amplified ESG-driven value creation due to stronger policy support and resource advantages. Robustness checks, including an instrumental variable analysis, reinforce the reliability of these conclusions, highlighting the interplay of ESG, intangible assets, and policy in driving long-term competitiveness within the sports sector. By addressing the unique dynamics of ESG in the sports industry, this research bridges a gap in the sector-specific literature and underscores ESG’s strategic importance in fostering sustainable business growth. The results provide actionable insights for corporate managers to align ESG strategies with brand development and for policymakers to design targeted frameworks that incentivize sustainable practices. Full article

Review

Jump to: Research

33 pages, 3338 KB  
Review
Integrating ESG into Business Sustainability Through Innovation and Digital Transformation: A Scoping Review of Sustainable Value Creation
by Wini Ebelin Quispe Bautista, Jose Antonio Rojas Guillén, Yadira Yanase Rojas and Doris Matilde Palacios Rojas
Sustainability 2026, 18(10), 4912; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18104912 - 14 May 2026
Abstract
Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices have become increasingly central to business sustainability strategies. Yet, the empirical literature remains fragmented regarding how ESG is translated into firm-level outcomes and sustainable value creation. This study conducts a scoping review to map the relationships among [...] Read more.
Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices have become increasingly central to business sustainability strategies. Yet, the empirical literature remains fragmented regarding how ESG is translated into firm-level outcomes and sustainable value creation. This study conducts a scoping review to map the relationships among ESG practices, innovation, and organizational value creation, with particular attention to business sustainability. Reported in accordance with PRISMA 2020, with additional consideration of guidance specific to scoping reviews, searches in Scopus, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect identified 87 empirical studies. The review examines ESG conceptualization and measurement, the structural roles of innovation, and value-related outcomes. The findings reveal three dominant patterns: ESG is most often operationalized through rating-based indicators; innovation, especially green innovation and digital transformation, frequently acts as the mechanism through which ESG is translated into organizational change and performance outcomes; and value creation is increasingly assessed through both financial and sustainability-oriented indicators. Based on these findings, the study synthesizes recurring empirical patterns into an integrative sustainability framework in which ESG is interpreted as a strategic orientation, innovation as a capability conversion layer, and sustainable organizational value as the resulting outcome. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop