Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
7.7
3.3
Journals
Sustainability
Special Issues
Quality Management in Manufacturing, Industrial, and Systems Engineering for Green...
sustainability-logo
Submit to Special Issue Submit Abstract to Special Issue Review for Sustainability Propose a Special Issue

Journal Menu

► Journal Menu

Journal Browser

► Journal Browser
share announcement

Quality Management in Manufacturing, Industrial, and Systems Engineering for Green Sustainability

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Sustainable Engineering and Science".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 22 July 2025 | Viewed by 16153

Special Issue Editors

Dr. Nita Yodo

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58102, USA
Interests: sustainability; reliability; resilience; failure recovery; uncertainty quantification; decision analysis; disaster management; complex system; system engineering; optimization
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals
Dr. Arup Dey

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Computer Science and Engineering Technology, Valdosta State University, Valdosta, GA 31698, USA
Interests: additive manufacturing; fused filament fabrication; 3D printing; industry 4.0; failure analysis; process parameter optimization; uncertainty quantification; machine learning; composite; biocomposite; materials

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

In the pursuit of global sustainability development, manufacturing, industrial, and systems engineering play pivotal roles. Quality management practices intersect with these domains to ensure that processes, products, and systems align with green sustainability objectives. This Special Issue, titled "Quality Management in Manufacturing, Industrial, and Systems Engineering for Green Sustainability", aims to provide a platform for cutting-edge research and innovations at the intersection of quality management and sustainable engineering practices.

We are pleased to invite contributions from researchers, practitioners, and academics to explore innovative approaches, methodologies, and case studies that bridge the gap between quality management principles and green sustainability objectives. Topics of interest encompass a wide range of subjects, from eco-friendly product design and sustainable supply chain management to integrating quality standards and certifications into green manufacturing practices. Research areas may include (but are not limited to) the following:

  • Quality metrics and key performance indicators (KPIs) for sustainability;
  • Quality principles in sustainable manufacturing processes;
  • Sustainable and green supply chain management;
  • Lean and Six Sigma applications for environmental sustainability;
  • Total Quality Management (TQM) for green manufacturing;
  • Application of Operational Research in sustainable industrial processes;
  • Quality control and assurance in eco-friendly product design;
  • The role of emerging technologies (Industry 4.0/5.0, IoT, AI, etc.) in green quality management;
  • Sustainable quality standards and reporting policies, such as SDGs, GRI, ESG, LEED;
  • Case studies demonstrating successful quality management in green initiatives.

By fostering a dialogue among experts in these fields, this Special Issue aims to advance our understanding of how quality management principles can drive and support sustainability initiatives, resulting in eco-conscious manufacturing processes, systems, and products. Join us in shaping the future of sustainable engineering with quality practices. We look forward to receiving your contributions.

Dr. Nita Yodo
Dr. Arup Dey
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • quality management
  • sustainability
  • industrial engineering
  • manufacturing processes
  • system integrations
  • Industry 4.0/5.0
  • supply chains
  • lean and six sigma
  • operation research
  • standards and policies

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (5 papers)

Download All Papers
Order results
Result details
Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

17 pages, 1250 KiB  
Article
Quality Risk Management in the Final Operational Stage of Sterile Pharmaceutical Manufacturing: A Case Study Highlighting the Management of Sustainable Related Risks in Product Sterilization, Inspection, Labeling, Packaging, and Storage Processes
by Bassam Elmadhoun, Rawidh Alsaidalani and Frank Burczynski
Sustainability 2025, 17(4), 1670; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17041670 - 17 Feb 2025
Viewed by 2172
Abstract
Quality risk management, commonly known as QRM, is designed to systematically assess, control, communicate, and review potential risks at every stage of the pharmaceutical manufacturing process. The preservation of consistent product quality across the entirety of the product’s life cycle is of paramount [...] Read more.
Quality risk management, commonly known as QRM, is designed to systematically assess, control, communicate, and review potential risks at every stage of the pharmaceutical manufacturing process. The preservation of consistent product quality across the entirety of the product’s life cycle is of paramount importance. The aim of this article is to formulate a best practice guide that will assist pharmaceutical manufacturers in comprehending and implementing the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) Q9: quality risk management principles. A widely recognized methodology for defining and monitoring risk mitigation strategies within the pharmaceutical sector is the Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA). ICH Q9 does not, however, offer detailed instructions for applying FMEA to real-world pharmaceutical situations. We previously provided real-world case studies that identify and mitigate risks in the early stages of the manufacturing process of sterile products, such as (1) supply chain and procurement; (2) logistics and warehousing; (3) raw material dispensing; (4) glass bottle washing and handling; (5) product filling; and (6) final product receiving and handling. The final steps of the sterile manufacturing process are the subject of the case study we present in this paper. We identify and control the risks related to (I) product sterilization; (II) product inspection, labeling, and packaging; (III) the finished product’s transfer to storage; and (IV) storing finished products in a warehouse. In order to maximize decision-making and reduce the risk of regulatory noncompliance, this case study describes a proactive strategy for the identification, management, and communication of risks associated with crucial tasks. While each organization’s products and methods are distinct, with varying tolerances for risk, certain stages and associated risks are common. Consequently, the examples provided here offer relevant insights into any pharmaceutical production environment. Managing sustainability-related risks and ensuring the transparency of pharmaceutical company operations are key tasks of success today. These risks, if not managed, will cause serious problems and a negative reputation, as well as environmental and public impact. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Quality Management in Manufacturing, Industrial, and Systems Engineering for Green Sustainability)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

29 pages, 2043 KiB  
Article
Multi-Criteria Sustainability Analysis for Variable Refrigerant Flow System Manufacturer Selection: An Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach to Environmental and Technical Performance
by Turhan Karakaya, Hamit Metin Örnek and Yavuz Selim Balcıoğlu
Sustainability 2025, 17(2), 781; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17020781 - 20 Jan 2025
Viewed by 1226
Abstract
This study presents a comprehensive framework for the sustainable selection of manufacturers in variable refrigerant flow (VRF) air conditioning systems by integrating environmental impact considerations with traditional technical and economic criteria using multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods. This research addresses the growing need for [...] Read more.
This study presents a comprehensive framework for the sustainable selection of manufacturers in variable refrigerant flow (VRF) air conditioning systems by integrating environmental impact considerations with traditional technical and economic criteria using multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods. This research addresses the growing need for sustainable HVAC solutions while acknowledging the complexity decision-makers face when evaluating multiple manufacturers across environmental, technical, and economic dimensions. Unlike previous studies that focus solely on technical performance or evaluate brands individually, this research introduces a novel approach by grouping manufacturers according to their country of origin (Japan, South Korea, China, Germany, Italy, and France) and assessing them through a sustainability lens. This study employs a three-tier methodology: first, utilizing the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to determine criteria weights with particular emphasis on environmental factors; second, developing a consensus decision matrix through expert evaluations; and third, applying VIKOR and EDAS methods for comprehensive ranking. The analysis encompasses environmental criteria, including energy efficiency, carbon footprint, and refrigerant global warming potential, alongside traditional technical, marketing, financial, and network considerations. The results indicate that while Japanese manufacturers maintain strong technical leadership, European manufacturers, particularly German ones, demonstrate superior environmental performance. These findings suggest that manufacturers can enhance their market position by balancing environmental sustainability with traditional performance metrics, particularly through improved energy efficiency, sustainable refrigerant selection, and circular economy practices. This research contributes to the growing body of knowledge on sustainable manufacturer selection in the HVAC industry and provides practical guidelines for decision-makers prioritizing environmental sustainability alongside technical performance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Quality Management in Manufacturing, Industrial, and Systems Engineering for Green Sustainability)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

34 pages, 898 KiB  
Article
Development of a Quality Deterioration Index for Sustainable Quality Management in High-Tech Electronics Manufacturing
by Shimon Fridkin, Michael Winokur and Amir Gamliel
Sustainability 2024, 16(15), 6592; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156592 - 1 Aug 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2520
Abstract
In high-tech electronics manufacturing, non-quality costs significantly impact organizational profitability and competitiveness. This case study introduces a novel Quality Deterioration Index (QDI) to systematically identify and prioritize root causes of non-quality costs within a leading electronics manufacturer. The primary objective is to integrate [...] Read more.
In high-tech electronics manufacturing, non-quality costs significantly impact organizational profitability and competitiveness. This case study introduces a novel Quality Deterioration Index (QDI) to systematically identify and prioritize root causes of non-quality costs within a leading electronics manufacturer. The primary objective is to integrate sustainable quality management practices that align with green sustainability objectives, such as reducing electronic waste, improving energy efficiency, and minimizing hazardous materials usage. Our comprehensive methodology encompasses a literature review, interviews, document analysis, and statistical analysis of survey data to uncover the influence of procedural, cultural, and environmental factors on quality deviations. The key findings reveal critical areas for improvement, particularly in supply chain inefficiencies, workforce challenges, and procedural gaps. By employing the QDI, we provide a structured framework that enhances both operational efficiency and environmental performance. The novelty of this research lies in its dual approach to simultaneously address economic and environmental performance, offering actionable insights for manufacturers aiming to integrate robust quality management systems with sustainability objectives. This study contributes to the ongoing dialogue on sustainable manufacturing strategies, underscoring the pivotal role of quality management in achieving both economic viability and environmental stewardship. Future research should expand this approach across various industries and global contexts to validate and refine the integration of quality management and sustainability. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Quality Management in Manufacturing, Industrial, and Systems Engineering for Green Sustainability)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 10143 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of Quality Performance in Paper Pulp vs. Polyethylene Nursery Pots for Green Sustainability
by Anunay Gupta, Arup Dey, Chiwon W. Lee and Nita Yodo
Sustainability 2024, 16(11), 4800; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114800 - 5 Jun 2024
Viewed by 6163
Abstract
The use of biodegradable paper pulp pots has been gaining traction, especially among environmentally conscious consumers and horticultural practitioners who prioritize sustainability. The choice between paper pulp and polyethylene nursery pots in horticultural practices is a complex decision, involving considerations such as environmental [...] Read more.
The use of biodegradable paper pulp pots has been gaining traction, especially among environmentally conscious consumers and horticultural practitioners who prioritize sustainability. The choice between paper pulp and polyethylene nursery pots in horticultural practices is a complex decision, involving considerations such as environmental impact, cost-effectiveness, durability, and overall sustainability. This study aims to provide practical insights into the comparative performance of paper pulp and polyethylene pots, specifically in terms of plant health, degradation, and techno-economic considerations. The study involved the growth performance assessment of four plant species, Cannonball Tomato, Celebrity Tomato, Parris Island Lettuce, and French Marigold, in a greenhouse experiment setup. Additionally, a degradation analysis was conducted to determine the average degradation rate and pattern. Finally, a techno-economic analysis compared the value of plant health and degradation with the market price. By evaluating the quality performance aspects of paper pulp pots, this study not only provides valuable insights but also identifies potential areas of improvement for other biodegradable pots, thereby contributing to the ongoing efforts to promote sustainable horticultural practices. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Quality Management in Manufacturing, Industrial, and Systems Engineering for Green Sustainability)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 2627 KiB  
Article
Eliminating Non-Value-Added Activities and Optimizing Manufacturing Processes Using Process Mining: A Stock of Challenges for Family SMEs
by Abderrazak Laghouag, Faiz bin Zafrah, Mohamed Rafik Noor Mohamed Qureshi and Alhussain Ali Sahli
Sustainability 2024, 16(4), 1694; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16041694 - 19 Feb 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3018
Abstract
Family small and medium enterprises (FSMEs) differ from non-family SMEs regarding leadership type, human resource management practices, innovation orientation, change management, information and communication technology deployment, process maturity, and resource availability. These differences present challenges when leading any change. Process mining (PM) tools [...] Read more.
Family small and medium enterprises (FSMEs) differ from non-family SMEs regarding leadership type, human resource management practices, innovation orientation, change management, information and communication technology deployment, process maturity, and resource availability. These differences present challenges when leading any change. Process mining (PM) tools can optimize process value and eliminate non-added-value activities in FSMEs based on “Event Logs”. The present study investigates how a PM project is implemented in an FSME operating in the agri-food sector, focusing on challenges faced in every project phase to extract the most appropriate process that eliminates all sources of waste and bottleneck cases. Drawing upon the L*Lifecycle methodology combined with quality and lean management tools such as the fishbone diagram, Pareto diagram, and overall equipment efficiency (OEE), this study applied a PM project to a manufacturing process for an FSME operating in the agri-food sector. To achieve theoretical production capacity (TPC) and customer satisfaction, the method was analyzed and optimized using Disco and ProM toolkits. The results analysis using Disco and ProM toolkits gave clues about the organizational and technical causes behind the manufacturing process’s inefficiency. First, OEE showed that the studied FSME is struggling with equipment availability. Then, the implementation of the L*Lifecycle methodology allowed for the identification of five critical causes. An action plan to eliminate causes was proposed to the FSME managers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Quality Management in Manufacturing, Industrial, and Systems Engineering for Green Sustainability)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
 
Displaying articles 1-5
Back to TopTop