Special Issue "The Involvement of Crowds for Advancing Knowledge, Promoting Innovation and Nurturing New Entrepreneurial Ventures"

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 December 2021.

Special Issue Editors

Dr. Francesco Cappa
E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Business and Management, Luiss Guido Carli University, Rome, Italy
Interests: innovation; open innovation; crowdsourcing; citizen science; crowdfunding; sustainability; open sustainable innovation; big data
Dr. Angelo Natalicchio
E-Mail
Guest Editor
Department of Mechanics, Mathematics and Management, Politecnico di Bari, Bari, Italy
Interests: innovation management; open innovation; crowdsourcing; crowdfunding; alliances; licensing; markets for ideas; patent analysis
Special Issues and Collections in MDPI journals
Dr. Riccardo Maiolini
E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Business Administration, John Cabot University, Rome, Italy
Interests: entrepreneurship; social innovation; crowdfunding; sustainability; social business modeling
Mr. Jakob Pohlisch
E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Innovation Economics, Technical University Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Interests: open innovation; crowdsourcing; knowledge search; user innovation; user innovation communities; peer innovation
Dr. Erica Mazzola
E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Engineering, Università degli Studi di Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy
Interests: innovation; strategy; operations
Special Issues and Collections in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

With this Special Issue, we aim to stimulate and collect state-of-the-art research on the emerging phenomena connected to the inclusion of crowds coming from inside or outside organizations’ boundaries to favor the advancement of knowledge, the development of innovation, and the spawning of new entrepreneurial ventures. Indeed, thanks to the pervasiveness of information technologies, individuals are increasingly being involved in: i) open innovation [1–3] and open sustainable innovation [4,5] through crowdsourcing [6–9]; ii) open innovation in science [10] and crowd science [11] by means of citizen science [12]; and iii) alternative funding methods thanks to crowdfunding [13–15]. Such crowd involvement also represents an additional strategy to better respond to the pressing grand challenges and sustainability issues we are facing today [4,10,16,17].

Notwithstanding the recent academic, policymaking, and managerial attention towards the inclusion of crowds in organizations’ activities due to the several benefits they can bring, our overall understanding of these topics is still limited and fragmented. Therefore, investigation about whether, how, when, and under which conditions crowd involvement can be beneficial for the organizations and all the stakeholders remains crucial.

Based on the above considerations, the topics welcome in this Special Issue include (but are not limited to):

  • How to better motivate the crowds to participate in crowdsourcing, citizen science, and crowdfunding activities;
  • Which are the organizations’ benefits and costs for involving dispersed individuals in their activities;
  • When the inclusion of crowds benefits organization performance;
  • Privacy issues, intellectual property rights concerns, data security, and legal risks in involving numerous individuals from inside or outside organizations’ boundaries;
  • Organizational designs and institutional factors that favor organizations tapping into crowd wisdom;
  • How organizations deal with the inputs coming from the crowd and complement them with those coming from internal resources;
  • Theoretical lenses to properly analyze crowdsourcing, citizen science and crowdfunding;
  • How the involvement of crowds may favor the collection and analysis of big data;
  • What does sustainability look like in the crowd age? How the crowd can push firms towards sustainable attitudes and outcomes.

References:

  1. West, J.; Salter, A.; Vanhaverbeke, W.; Chesbrough, H. Open innovation: The next decade. Research Policy 2014, 43, 805–811.
  2. Enkel, E.; Gassmann, O.; Chesbrough, H. Open R&D and open innovation: exploring the phenomenon. R&d Management 2009, 39, 311–316.
  3. Grosse, M.; Pohlisch, J.; Korbel, J.J. Triggers of collaborative innovation in online user communities. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 2018, 4, 59–78.
  4. Cappa, F.; Rosso, F.; Hayes, D. Monetary and Social Rewards for Crowdsourcing. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2834.
  5. Arcese, G.; Flammini, S.; Lucchetti, M.C.; Martucci, O. Evidence and experience of open sustainability innovation practices in the food sector. Sustainability (Switzerland) 2015, 7, 8067–8090.
  6. Piazza, M.; Mazzola, E.; Acur, N.; Perrone, G. Governance Considerations for Seeker–Solver Relationships: A Knowledge‐Based Perspective in Crowdsourcing for Innovation Contests. British Journal of Management 2019, 30, 810–828.
  7. Cappa, F.; Oriani, R.; Pinelli, M.; De Massis, A. When does crowdsourcing benefit firm stock market performance. Research Policy 2019, 48, 103825.
  8. Natalicchio, A.; Messeni Petruzzelli, A.; Garavelli, A.C. Innovation problems and search for solutions in crowdsourcing platforms – A simulation approach. Technovation 2017, 64, 28–42.
  9. Mazzola, E.; Acur, N.; Piazza, M.; Perrone, G. “To Own or Not to Own?” A Study on the Determinants and Consequences of Alternative Intellectual Property Rights Arrangements in Crowdsourcing for Innovation Contests. Journal of Product Innovation Management 2018, 35, 908–929.
  10. Cappa, F.; Rosso, F.; Capaldo, A. Visitor-Sensing: Involving the Crowd in Cultural Heritage Organizations. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1445.
  11. Franzoni, C.; Sauermann, H. Crowd science: The organization of scientific research in open collaborative projects. Research Policy 2014, 43, 1–20.
  12. Aristeidou, M.; Scanlon, E.; Sharples, M. Profiles of engagement in online communities of citizen science participation. Computers in Human Behavior 2017, 74, 246–256.
  13. Stemler, A.R. The JOBS Act and crowdfunding: Harnessing the power-and money-of the masses. Business Horizons 2013, 56, 271–275.
  14. Cappa, F.; Pinelli, M.; Maiolini, R.; Leone, M.I. “Pledge” me your ears! The role of narratives and narrator experience in explaining crowdfunding success. Small Business Economics 2020, In Press.
  15. Messeni Petruzzelli, A.; Natalicchio, A.; Panniello, U.; Roma, P. Understanding the crowdfunding phenomenon and its implications for sustainability. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2019, 141, 138–148.
  16. Lopes, C.M.; Scavarda, A.; Hofmeister, L.F.; Thomé, A.M.T.; Vaccaro, G.L.R. An analysis of the interplay between organizational sustainability, knowledge management, and open innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production 2017, 142, 476–488.
  17. Kuhlmann, S.; Rip, A. Next-Generation Innovation Policy and Grand Challenges. Science and Public Policy 2018, 45, 448–454.

Dr. Francesco Cappa
Dr. Angelo Natalicchio
Dr. Riccardo Maiolini
Mr. Jakob Pohlisch
Dr. Erica Mazzola
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All papers will be peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1900 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Crowd
  • Crowdsourcing
  • Crowdfunding
  • Citizen science
  • Crowd science
  • Crowd wisdom
  • Open innovation
  • Open sustainable innovation
  • Open innovation in science
  • Sustainability
  • Grand challenges

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

Article
Community Support or Funding Amount: Actual Contribution of Reward-Based Crowdfunding to Market Success of Video Game Projects on Kickstarter
Sustainability 2021, 13(16), 9195; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169195 - 16 Aug 2021
Viewed by 345
Abstract
The research provides empirical evidence differentiating between market success and funding success in reward-based crowdfunding campaigns of video games and hypothesizes that the actual contribution of crowdfunding is more stemming from community support and feedback rather than funding amount. The paper uses publicly [...] Read more.
The research provides empirical evidence differentiating between market success and funding success in reward-based crowdfunding campaigns of video games and hypothesizes that the actual contribution of crowdfunding is more stemming from community support and feedback rather than funding amount. The paper uses publicly available data by combining three different sources. Project data from Kickstarter, a large crowdfunding website, in the video game category are extracted and matched with market success variables of ratings and revenues from two other public sources namely Metacritic and Steamspy. Regression results indicate that once the project is successfully funded, the funding amount does not have a significant effect on market success variables. On the other hand, the number of backers as a community support variable is a significant determinant of market success in terms of higher revenues and ratings for a project. Whether the project was successfully funded or not moderates some of the relationships. Prior literature is predominantly focused on crowdfunding success in terms of financing. Yet, this study empirically demonstrates that funding does not necessarily indicate that projects will be successful in the market and further shows the actual contribution of crowdfunding to the market success of video game projects is the community engagement, not the funding amount. This study contributes to the rapidly emerging crowdfunding literature by extending its boundaries from the crowdfunding platforms themselves to the differentiated effects of crowdfunding on market success, which has not been studied thoroughly. This paper provides a new avenue of research by suggesting not solely focusing on funding outcomes but understanding, defining and explaining the dynamics of the community aspect in crowdfunding platforms with their repercussions on market success. Future work can also highlight potential differences in these effects between product groups, as well as more holistically assess market success and capture interactions within the community on crowdfunding platforms. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

Review
Towards a Transdisciplinary Theoretical Framework of Citizen Science: Results from a Meta-Review Analysis
Sustainability 2021, 13(14), 7904; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147904 - 15 Jul 2021
Viewed by 357
Abstract
This work intends to lay the foundations for a theoretical framework of citizen science combining social and organizational implications with the support of information technologies. The proposed theoretical framework moves towards a shared and common research process between experts and citizens to deal [...] Read more.
This work intends to lay the foundations for a theoretical framework of citizen science combining social and organizational implications with the support of information technologies. The proposed theoretical framework moves towards a shared and common research process between experts and citizens to deal with environmental and social challenges. The role and capacity of online communities is explored and their engagement capacity by means of web-based digital platforms supporting crowdsourcing activities. In this contribution, authors highlight the most common practices, methods and issues of citizen science approaches adopted from multidisciplinary application fields to obtain insights for designing a new participative approach for organizational studies. To reach this goal, authors illustrate the results of a systematic meta-review analysis, consisting of an accurate selection and revision of journal review articles in order to highlight concepts, methods, research design approaches and tools adopted in citizen science approaches. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop